Effect of poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride) imidization on the miscibility and phase‐separation temperatures of poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride)/poly(vinyl methyl ether) and poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride)/ poly(methyl methacrylate) blends

The objective of this work was to study the miscibility and phase‐separation temperatures of poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride) (SMA)/poly(vinyl methyl ether) (PVME) and SMA/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) blends with differential scanning calorimetry and small‐angle light scattering techniques. We focused on the effect of SMA partial imidization with aniline on the miscibility and phase‐separation temperatures of these blends. The SMA imidization reaction led to a partially imidized styrene N‐phenyl succinimide copolymer (SMI) with a degree of conversion of 49% and a decomposition temperature higher than that of SMA by about 20°C. We observed that both SMI/PVME and SMI/PMMA blends had lower critical solution temperature behavior. The imidization of SMA increased the phase‐separation temperature of the SMA/PVME blend and decreased that of the SMA/PMMA blend. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Kinetics of phase separation of poly(styrene‐co‐methyl methacrylate) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) blends

The phase behavior and kinetics of phase separation for blends of the random copolymer poly(styrene‐co‐methyl methacrylate) (SMMA) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) were studied by using small‐angle laser light scattering. The partially miscible SMMA/SAN blends undergo spinodal decomposition (SD) and subsequent domain coarsening when quenched inside the unstable region. For blends of SMMA and SAN, the early stages of the phase separation process could be observed, unlike a number of other blends where the earliest stages are not visible by light scattering. The process was described in terms of the Cahn–Hilliard linear theory. Subsequently, a coarsening process was detected and the time evolution of q_m at the beginning of the late stages of phase separation followed the relationship q_m∝t^?1/3, corresponding to an evaporation–condensation mechanism. Self‐similar growth of the phase‐separated structures at different timescales was observed for the late stage. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry     

Polymer blends of stereoregular poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(styrene‐co‐p‐hydroxystyrene)

Isotactic, atactic, and syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylates) (PMMAs) (designated as iPMMA, aPMMA, and sPMMA) were mixed with poly(styrene‐co‐p‐hydroxystyrene) (abbreviated as PHS) containing 15 mol % of hydroxystyrene separately in 2‐butanone to make three polymer blend systems. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy were used to study the miscibility of these blends. The three polymer blends were found to be miscible, because all the prepared films were transparent and there was a single glass transition temperature (T_g) for each composition of the polymers. T_g elevation (above the additivity rule) is observed in all the three PMMA/PHS blends mainly because of hydrogen bonding. If less effective hydrogen bonding based on the FTIR evidence is assumed to infer less exothermic mixing, sPMMA may not be miscible with PHS over a broader range of conditions as iPMMA and aPMMA. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 73: 431–440, 1999     

Study of the nonlinear phase‐separation behavior of a polystyrene/poly(vinyl methyl ether) blend using small‐angle light scattering

The thermally induced phase‐separation behavior of a polystyrene/poly(vinyl methyl ether) (PS/PVME) blend was studied mainly using time‐resolved small‐angle light scattering, as a function of temperature and heating rate. Under a non‐isothermal field, the dependence of the critical temperature on heating rate deviated obviously from linearity, even at very low heating rates. Such a nonlinear dependence was consistent with the deviation from linearity of the temperature dependence of the isothermal phase‐separation behavior in a wider temperature range from 100 to 140 °C. It was also found that a Williams–Landel–Ferry (WLF)‐like equation could be employed to describe the temperature dependence of the apparent diffusion coefficient (D_app) and the relaxation time (τ) of normalized scattering intensity at the early stage of spinodal decomposition (SD), as well as τ of phase behavior at the late stage of SD for the PS/PVME blend. The equilibrium phase‐separation temperature could hardly be established through the conventional linear extrapolation of heating rate or D_app to zero at the early stage of SD. The successful use of the WLF‐like function for PS/PVME blends extends the applicability of the time–temperature superposition principle for describing the phase‐separation behavior of binary polymer mixtures over a relatively large temperature range. Copyright © 2010 Society of Chemical Industry     

Investigation on the miscibility of the blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)

The miscibility was investigated in blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and styrene‐acrylonitrile (SAN) copolymers with different acrylonitrile (AN) contents. The 50/50 wt % blends of PMMA with the SAN copolymers containing 5, 35, and 50 wt % of AN were immiscible, while the blend with copolymer containing 25 wt % of AN was miscible. The morphologies of PMMA/SAN blends were characterized by virtue of scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. It was found that the miscibility of PMMA/SAN blends were in consistence with the morphologies observed. Moreover, the different morphologies in blends of PMMA and SAN were also observed. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Phase behavior of ternary blends containing dimethylpolycarbonate,tetramethylpolycarbonate and poly[styrene‐co‐(methyl methacrylate)] copolymers (or polystyrene)

The miscibility and phase behavior of ternary blends containing dimethylpolycarbonate (DMPC), tetramethylpolycarbonate (TMPC) and poly[styrene‐co‐(methyl methacrylate)] copolymer (SMMA) have been explored. Ternary blends containing polystyrene (PS) instead of SMMA were also examined. Blends of DMPC with SMMA copolymers (or PS) did not form miscible blends regardless of methyl methacrylate (MMA) content in copolymers. However, DMPC blends with SMMA (or PS) blends become miscible by adding TMPC. The miscible region of ternary blends is compared with the previously determined miscibility region of binary blends having the same chemical components and compositions. The region where the ternary blends are miscible is much narrower than that of binary blends. Based on lattice fluid theory, the observed phase behavior of ternary blends was analyzed. Even though the term representing the Gibbs free energy change of mixing for certain ternary blends had a negative value, blends were immiscible. It was revealed that a negative value of the Gibbs free energy change of mixing was not a sufficient condition for miscible ternary blends because of the asymmetry in the binary interactions involved in ternary blends. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry     

Study on the phase behavior of ethylene–vinyl acetate copolymer and poly(methyl methacrylate) blends by in situ polymerization

This study examines the phase behavior of ethylene–vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) blends during MMA polymerization. The ternary PMMA/MMA/EVA mixtures are considered to create a triangular phase diagram, which responds the phase changes during polymerization. The phase changes during MMA polymerization are also examined by optical microscope and photometer. Since the PMMA and EVA are well‐known immiscibles, the polymer solution undergoes phase separation at the initial stage of the MMA polymerization. Additionally, the phase inversion occurs as the conversion of MMA between 13.8 and 20.8%. On the other hand, the EVA‐graft‐PMMA, which can reduce the dispersed EVA particle size, is induced efficiently by taking tert‐butyl peroctoate (t‐BO) as initiator during MMA polymerization. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 1001–1008, 2003     

Investigation on the early and late stage phase-separation dynamics of poly(methyl methacrylate)/poly(α-methyl styrene-co-acrylonitrile) blends through rheological and scattering functions

The phase-separation behavior of poly(methyl methacrylate)/poly(α-methyl styrene-co-acrylonitrile) (PMMA/α-MSAN) blends with two different compositions was studied by time-resolved small angle light scattering (SALS) in the spinodal decomposition (SD) regime from 160 to 210 °C. The rheological function (WLF-like equation) was introduced into the processing of light scattering data. It was found that the WLF-like equation was applicable to describe the temperature dependence of apparent diffusion coefficient D_app and the relaxation time τ of normalized scattering intensity (I(t)−I(0))/(I_m−I(0)) at the early stage of SD, as well as the relaxation time τ of maximum scattering intensity I_m and characteristic scattering vector q_m with I_m at the late stage of SD for PMMA/α-MSAN blends with two different compositions. This is in consistence with the phase-separation behavior of PMMA/SAN reported in our previous paper.     

Immiscibility–miscibility phase transitions in blends of poly(L‐lactide) with poly(methyl methacrylate)

BACKGROUND: The nature of phase transitions and apparently irreversible phase homogenization upon heating in blends of biodegradable poly(L ‐lactide) (PLLA) with poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) were proven using differential scanning calorimetry, polarized optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and ¹H NMR spectroscopy. The complex phase behaviour in this blend system is puzzling and is a matter of debate; this study attempts to clarify the true nature of the phase behaviour. RESULTS: A PMMA/PLLA blend is immiscible at ambient temperature but can become miscible upon heating to higher temperatures with an upper critical solution temperature (UCST) at 230 °C. The blends, upon rapid quenching from the UCST, can be frozen into a quasi‐miscible state. In this state, the interaction strength was determined to be χ₁₂ = ? 0.15 to ? 0.19, indicating relatively weak interactions between the PLLA ester and PMMA acrylic carbonyl groups. CONCLUSION: The absence of chemical exchange reactions above the UCST and phase reversibility back to the original phase separation morphology, assisted by solvent re‐dissolution, in the heat‐homogenized PLLA/PMMA blend was shown. Verification of UCST behaviour, phase diagrams and solvent‐assisted phase reversibility were experimentally demonstrated in PMMA/PLLA blends. Copyright © 2008 Society of Chemical Industry     

Blending poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) as composite polymer electrolyte

A blend of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (PSAN) has been evaluated as a composite polymer electrolyte by means of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, ac impedance measurements, and linear sweep voltammetry (LSV). The blends show an interaction with the Li⁺ ions when complexed with lithium perchlorate (LiClO₄), which results in an increase in the glass‐transition temperature (T_g) of the blends. The purpose of using PSAN as another component of the blend is to improve the poor mechanical properties of PMMA‐based plasticized electrolytes. The mechanical property is further improved by introducing fumed silica as inert filler, and hence the liquid electrolyte uptake and ionic conductivity of the composite systems are increased. Room‐temperature conductivity of the order of 10^?4 S/cm has been achieved for one of the composite electrolytes made from a 1/1 blend of PSAN and PMMA containing 120% liquid electrolyte [1M LiClO₄/propylene carbonate (PC)] and 10% fumed silica. These systems also showed good compatibility with Li electrodes and sufficient electrochemical stability for safe operation in Li batteries. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 80: 1319–1328, 2001     

Synthesis of polyethylene‐graft‐poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride) and its compatibilizing effects on polyethylene/starch blends

Low density polyethylene (LDPE) was reacted with benzoyl peroxide (BPO) and 2,2,6,6‐tetramethyl‐l‐piperidinyloxy (TEMPO) to prepare a latent macroinitiator, PE–TEMPO. Little polymer was synthesized when maleic anhydride (MAH) was bulk polymerized in the presence of the PE–TEMPO. However, addition of styrene accelerated the polymerization rate and PE‐grafted‐poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhyride) [PE‐g‐P(ST‐co‐MAH)] was produced to a high yield. Chemical reaction between MAH units and hydroxyl groups of starch was nearly undetectable in the PE/PE‐g‐P(ST‐co‐MAH)/starch blend system, and the tensile properties of the blend were not enhanced significantly. However, addition of tetrabutyl titanate (TNBT) during the blending procedure improved the tensile properties significantly through an increased interfacial adhesion between the components in the blend system. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 88: 2434–2438, 2003     

Comparison of the phase behaviour of the liquid-crystalline polymer/poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(vinyl acetate)/poly(methyl methacrylate) blends

The phase behaviour of blends of a liquid-crystalline polymer (LCP) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), as well as the phase state of blends of PMMA and poly(vinyl acetate) (PVA) has been investigated using light scattering and phase-contrast optical microscopy. The blends of LCP and PMMA have been obtained by coagulation from ternary solutions. The cloud point curves were determined. It was established that both pairs demix upon heating, ie have an LCST. In the region of intermediate composition, the phase separation proceeds according to a spinodal mechanism; however for LCP/PMMA blends, the decomposition proceeds according to a non-linear regime from the very onset. In the region of small amounts of LCP, the phase separation follows a mechanism of nucleation and growth. For PMMA/PVA blends, the spinodal decomposition proceeds according to a linear regime, in spite of the molecular mobility that PVA chains develop at lower temperatures. Only after prolonged heat treatment does the process transit to a non-linear regime. The data show a similarity between the phase behaviour of blends of liquid-crystalline and of flexible amorphous polymers. The distinction consists of the absence of a linear regime of decomposition for LCP-PMMA blends. © 1999 Society of Chemical Industry     

Configurational effects on the crystalline morphology and amorphous phase behavior in poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate) blends with tactic poly(methyl methacrylate)

Poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) blends with two tactic poly(methyl methacrylate)s [PMMAs; isotactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (iPMMA) and syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (sPMMA)], being chiral/tactic polymer pairs, were investigated with regard to their crystalline spherulite patterns, optical birefringence, and amorphous phase behavior with polarized optical microscopy and differential scanning calorimetry. The PHB/sPMMA and PHB/iPMMA blends exhibited upper critical solution temperatures of about 225 and 240°C, respectively, on the basis of the results of thermal analysis and phase morphology. The interactions of two constituents in the blends (PHB/iPMMA or PHB/sPMMA) were measured to be insignificantly different for the PHB/sPMMA and PHB/iPMMA blends. However, syndiotacticity in PMMA exerted a prominent effect on the alteration of the PHB spherulite morphology, whereas, by contrast, isotacticity in PMMA had almost no effect at all. At high sPMMA contents (e.g., 30 wt %) in the PHB/sPMMA blend, the spherulites were all negatively birefringent and ringless when they were crystallized at any crystallization temperature between 50 and 90°C. That is, not only was the original ring‐banded pattern in the neat PHB spherulites completely disrupted, but the optical sign was also reverted completely from positively to negatively birefringent in the sPMMA/PHB blend; this was not observed in the iPMMA/PHB one. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2013     

Hydrolytic degradation of poly(l‐lactic acid)/poly(methyl methacrylate) blends

The hydrolytic degradation of poly(l ‐lactic acid)/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PLLA/PMMA) blends was carried out by the immersion of thin films in buffer solutions (pH = 7.24) in a shaking water bath at 60 °C for 38 days. The PLA/PMMA blends (0/100; 30/70; 50/50; 70/30; 100/0) were obtained by melt blending using a Brabender internal mixer and shaped into thin films of about 150 µm in thickness. Considering that PMMA does not undergo hydrolytic degradation, that of PLLA was followed via evolution of PLA molecular weight (recorded by size exclusion chromatography), thermal parameters (differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)) and morphology of the films (scanning transmission electron microscopy). The results reveal a completely different degradation pathway of the blends depending on the polymethacrylate/polyester weight ratio. DSC data suggest that, during hydrolysis at higher PMMA content, the polyester amorphous chains, more sensitive to water, are degraded before being able to crystallize, while at higher PLLA content, the crystallization is favoured leading to a sample more resistant to hydrolysis. In other words, and quite unexpectedly, increasing the content of water‐sensitive PLLA in the PLLA/PMMA blends does not mean de facto faster hydrolytic degradation of the resulting materials. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry     

Crystallization behavior and hydrophilicity of poly(vinylidene fluoride)/poly(methyl methacrylate)/poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) ternary blends

Ternary blends composed of matrix polymer poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) with different proportions of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)/poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP) blends were prepared by melt mixing. The miscibility, crystallization behavior, mechanical properties and hydrophilicity of the ternary blends have been investigated. The high compatibility of PVDF/PMMA/PVP ternary blends is induced by strong interactions between the carbonyl groups of the PMMA/PVP blend and the CF₂ or CH₂ group of PVDF. According to the Fourier transform infrared and wide‐angle X‐ray difffraction analyses, the introduction of PMMA does not change the crystalline state (i.e. α phase) of PVDF. By contrast, the addition of PVP in the blends favors the transformation of the crystalline state of PVDF from non‐polar α to polar β phase. Moreover, the crystallinity of the PVDF/PMMA/PVP ternary blends also decreases compared with neat PVDF. Through mechanical analysis, the elongation at break of the blends significantly increases to more than six times that of neat PVDF. This confirms that the addition of the PMMA/PVP blend enhances the toughness of PVDF. Besides, the hydrophilicity of PVDF is remarkably improved by blending with PMMA/PVP; in particular when the content of PVP reaches 30 wt%, the water contact angle displays its lowest value which decreased from 91.4° to 51.0°. Copyright © 2011 Society of Chemical Industry     

Nanophase morphology and crystallization in poly(vinylidene fluoride)/polydimethylsiloxane‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate) blends

A polydimethylsiloxane‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate) (PDMS‐b‐PMMA) diblock copolymer was synthesized by the atom transfer radical polymerization method and blended with a high‐molecular‐weight poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF). In this A‐b‐B/C type of diblock copolymer/homopolymer system, semi‐crystallizable PVDF (C) and PMMA (B) block are miscible due to favorable intermolecular interactions. However, the A block (PDMS) is immiscible with PVDF and therefore generates nanostructured morphology via self‐assembly. Crystallization study reveals that both α and γ crystalline phases of PVDF are present in the blends with up to 30 wt% of PDMS‐b‐PMMA block copolymer. Adding 10 wt% of PVDF to PDMS‐b‐PMMA diblock copolymer leads to worm‐like micelle morphology of PDMS of 10 nm in diameter and tens of nanometers in length. Moreover, morphological results show that PDMS nanostructures are localized in the inter‐fibrillar region of PVDF with the addition of up to 20 wt% of the block copolymer. Increase of PVDF long period by 45% and decrease of degree of crystallization by 34% confirm the localization of PDMS in the PVDF inter‐fibrillar region. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry     

Direct polymer reaction of poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride): Polymeric imidization

Using direct polymer reaction of poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride) (SMA), a synthesis of copolymer of styrene and N‐aryl succinimide (SMI) has been investigated. SMI copolymers were synthesized from SMA copolymers by a concerted two‐step reaction, which consisted of the condensation reaction (step 1) of SMA with aromatic amine to prepare a precursor, succinamic acid, for imide formation and the cyclodehydration reaction (step 2) of succinamic acid. In this article, the application of Searle's preparation method of N‐aryl or N‐alkyl maleimide to the direct polymer reaction for SMI was attempted. Compared with synthesis of monomeric imides, the imide formation in polymeric condition appeared to be a little more sensitive to the reaction condition. The optimum condition for maximum conversion was examined in terms of time, temperature, and the amount of reactants. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 71: 1187–1196, 1999     

Phase separation behavior and morphologies of PMMA/poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)/clay nanocomposites prepared by solution mixing

Nanocomposites of blends of PMMA and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) with natural (PM) or organically modified montmorillonite clays (Cloisite 30B, 25A, and 15A) were prepared by solution mixing and the effect of clay on the phase separation behavior along with morphologies of nanocomposites was investigated. Nanocomposites containing clay C30B prepared from methyl ethyl ketone showed the noticeable decrease in the cloud points. None of the other nanocomposites showed the increase in the cloud point. Location of clay particles in the phase separated matrix is observed to be different depending on the type of clays and solvents. The lowest cloud point of nanocomposites containing C30B may arise from the good dispersion of C30B where Clay C30B may act as the nucleating agent inducing phase separation. Dynamic mechanical and thermal analyses support above observations. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

Properties of soy protein isolate/poly(ethylene‐co‐ethyl acrylate‐co‐maleic anhydride) blends

Blends of soy protein isolate (SPI) with 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50% poly(ethylene‐co‐ethyl acrylate‐co‐maleic anhydride) (PEEAMA), with or without addition of 2.0 wt % methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI), were prepared by mixing with an intensive mixer at 150°C for 5 min, and then milling through a 1‐mm sieve. Blends were then compression‐molded into a tensile bar at 140°C. Thermal and mechanical properties and water absorption of the blends were studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), dynamical mechanic analysis (DMA), a test of modulus and tensile strength (with an Instron tensile tester), a water absorption test, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The blends showed two composition‐dependent glass transition temperatures. Furthermore, as the SPI content increased, the melting temperature of PEEAMA remained constant but the heat of fusion decreased. These results indicate that SPI and PEEAMA were partially miscible. Morphology observations support these results. Increasing the PEEAMA content resulted in decreases in the modulus and tensile strengths and increases in the elongation and toughness of the blends. Water absorption of the blends also decreased with increased PEEAMA content. Incorporating MDI further decreased the water absorption of the blends. The mechanism of water sorption of SPI was relaxation controlled, and that of the blends was diffusion controlled. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 88: 407–413, 2003     

Compatibilization of poly(vinyl chloride) and polystyrene blends with poly(styrene‐co‐n‐methylolacrylamide)

In this work, the compatibilization of blends of plasticized polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and polystyrene (PS) with poly(styrene‐co‐n‐methylolacrylamide) (PSnMA) was investigated. The PSnMA was synthesized by emulsion polymerization with different amounts of n‐methylolacrylamide (nMA). Particle size and phase behavior was determined by scanning electron microscopy, and mechanical properties were determined in an Universal Testing Machine. Micrographs revealed that an appreciable size reduction of the dispersed phase was achieved when small amounts of PSnMA were added to the blend, and as the amount of nMA was increased, particle size decreased. When the (PVC/PS/PSnMA) blend was subjected to solvent extraction to remove PS and unreacted PVC, the residue showed a single T_g. Tensile modulus and the ultimate strength of the blends increased with PSnMA content. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008