Preparation of compatibilizer with large specific surface and its application in immiscible polymer blends with ultra‐high molecular weight

In this work, a compatibilizer (UHMWPE‐g‐GO) with large specific surface was prepared from graphene oxide (GO) and ultra‐high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE). First, GO was modified by 2, 3‐epoxypropyltrimethylammonium chloride (GTA), subsequently grafted with UHMWPE. UHMWPE‐g‐GO was used to compatibilize the immiscible monomer casting (MC) nylon/UHMWPE blends. With the addition of very low content of UHMWPE‐g‐GO, the compatibility of UHMWPE and the matrix (MC nylon) was remarkably improved without visible agglomerates, which was proved by photographs, scanning electron microscope, dynamic thermomechanical analysis, and contact angle measurement. Therefore, thermal stability, mechanical and tribological properties were obviously increased. A dramatic increment of 94.1% in the impact strength and a decrement of 39.4% in the coefficient friction were observed in the presence of UHMWPE‐g‐GO in the immiscible polymer blends. The approach used in this work was an efficient strategy for immiscible polymer blends with ultra‐high molecular weight. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 57:335–344, 2017. © 2016 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Compatibilization and morphology development of immiscible ternary polymer blends

We report a novel and effective strategy that compatibilizes three immiscible polymers, polyolefins, styrene polymers, and engineering plastics, achieved by using a polyolefin-based multi-phase compatibilizer. Compatibilizing effect and morphology development are investigated in a model ternary immiscible polymer blends consisting of polypropylene (PP)/polystyrene(PS)/polyamide(PA6) and a multi-phase compatibilizer (PP-g-(MAH-co-St) as prepared by maleic anhydride (MAH) and styrene (St) dual monomers melt grafting PP. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) results indicate that, as a multi-phase compatibilizer, PP-g-(MAH-co-St) shows effective compatibilization in the PP/PS/PA6 blends. The particle size of both PS and PA6 is greatly decreased due to the addition of multi-phase compatibilizer, while the interfacial adhesion in immiscible pairs is increased. This good compatibilizing effect is promising for developing a new, technologically attractive method for achieving compatibilization of immiscible multi-component polymer blends as well as for recycling and reusing of such blends. For phase morphology development, the morphology of PP/PS/PA6 (70/15/15) uncompatibilized blend reveals that the blend is constituted from PP matrix in which are dispersed composite droplets of PA6 core encapsulated by PS phase. Whereas, the compatibilized blend shows the three components strongly interact with each other, i.e. multi-phase compatibilizer has good compatibilization between the various immiscible pairs. For the 40/30/30 blend, the morphology changed from a three-phase co-continuous morphology (uncompatibilized) to the dispersed droplets of PA6 and PS in the PP matrix (compatibilized).     

Carbon black–filled immiscible blends of poly(vinylidene fluoride) and high density polyethylene: Electrical properties and morphology

The electrical conductivity, current-voltage characteristics and morphology of carbon black–filled immiscible blends of poly(vinylidene fluoride)(PVDF) and high density polyethylene (HDPF) were investigated. Carbon black (CB) had stronger affinity to HDPE than to PVDF, resulting in its selective localization in the HDPE phase. The CB content and PVDF/HDPE volume ratio were the two main factors influencing the electrical conductivity, current-voltage characteristics, and morphology. At a fixed PVDF/HDPE volume ratio of 1/1, a percolation threshold of 0.037 volume fraction of CB was observed, and that value was much lower than that for conventional CB-filled polymer composites. At a fixed CB content (10 wt% CB), a maximum electrical conductivity was observed at a PVDF/HDPE volume ratio of 2.75. An increase in CB content in the composites with a fixed PVDF/HDPE volume ratio (1/1) and an increase in PVDF content in composites with a fixed CB content (10 wt%) greatly decreased the domain size of the PVDF phase. A positive-temperature-coefficient effect was used to determine the location of CB in the blends.     

Compatibilization of polypropylene/nylon 6 blends with a polypropylene solid‐phase graft

The compatibilization of polypropylene (PP)/nylon 6 (PA6) blends with a new PP solid‐phase graft copolymer (gPP) was systematically studied. gPP improved the compatibility of PP/PA6 blends efficiently. Because of the reaction between the reactive groups of gPP and the NH₂ end groups of PA6, a PP‐g‐PA6 copolymer was formed as a compatibilizer in the vicinity of the interfaces during the melting extrusion of gPP and PA6. The tensile strength and impact strength of the compatibilized PP/PA6 blends obviously increased in comparison with those of the PP/PA6 mechanical blends, and the amount of gPP and the content of the third monomer during the preparation of gPP affected the mechanical properties of the compatibilized blends. Scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy indicated that the particle sizes of the dispersed phases of the compatibilized PP/PA6 blends became smaller and that the interfaces became more indistinct in comparison with the mechanical blends. The microcrystal size of PA6 and the crystallinity of the two components of the PP/PA6 blends decreased after compatibilization with gPP. The compatibilized PP/PA6 blends possessed higher pseudoplasticity, melt viscosity, and flow activation energy. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 93: 420–427, 2004     

Compatibilization Mechanism of Nanoclay in Immiscible PS/PMMA Blend Using Unmodified Nanoclay

Organically modified nanoclays have been reported to play the role of a compatibilizer for immiscible polymer blends. However, the mechanism of compatibilization by nanoclay has been reported differently. In this work, we investigated the exact mechanism of compatibilization of nanoclay in immiscible polystyrene (PS)/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) blend in the presence of sodium-montmorillonite (Na-MMT) through selective dispersion of clay in the matrix phase. Through a detailed investigation of the morphology of PS/PMMA/Na-MMT blend nanocomposites, the plausible mechanism behind the compatibilization effect of clay in immiscible blends has been proposed.     

Effects of maleated styrene–(ethylene‐co‐butene)–styrene on compatibilization and properties of nylon‐12,12/nylon‐6 blends

Effects of a maleated triblock copolymer of styrene–(ethylene‐co‐butene)–styrene (SEBS‐g‐MA) on compatibilization and mechanical properties of nylon‐12,12/nylon‐6 blends were investigated. The results showed that addition of SEBS‐g‐MA could improve the compatibility between nylon‐12,12 and nylon‐6. Nylon‐12,12 could disperse very well in nylon‐6 matrix, although the dispersion of nylon‐6 was poor when nylon‐6 was the dispersed phase. At a fixed nylon‐12,12/nylon‐6 ratio of 30/70, supertoughness was achieved with addition of 15% SEBS‐g‐MA in weight. Scanning electron microscopy of the impact‐fractured surface indicated that cavitation and matrix shear yielding were the predominant mechanisms of impact energy dissipation. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 93: 1446–1453, 2004     

Synergistic flame‐retarded effect between carbon nanotubes and ammonium polyphosphate in Nylon6 and Nylon6/polystyrene blends

The association of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and ammonium polyphosphate (APP) as flame retardants was utilized for improving the flame retardancy of nylon6 (PA6) and blends of PA6/Polystyrene (PS). A remarkable synergistic effect between APP and CNTs was observed in PA6 at 1‐wt% CNTs loading. Rheological tests showed that 1‐wt% CNTs formed a network structure. Morphology of residue char indicated that a network enhanced synergistic effect. A synergy between APP and CNTs in blends of PA6/PS (56/24) was also investigated. APP and CNTs exhibited a remarkable synergistic effect at 0.25‐wt% CNTs loading, but the antagonistic effect on flame retardancy of blends was observed at 1‐wt% CNTs loading. Transmission electron microscopy showed that CNTs were exclusively dispersed in the PA6 phase of blends. The selective dispersion of CNTs caused the formation of a network at 0.25‐wt% CNTs loading. Morphology of residue char indicated that 0.25‐wt% CNTs were benefited by the formation of a continuous and well‐swollen residue char that enhanced the synergistic effect in blends. However, the aggregation of 1‐wt% CNTs in PA6 phase caused high viscosity of PA6 phase, resulting in a poor expansion of the residue char. Consequently, the antagonism was exhibited.     

Melt rheology and morphology of uncompatibilized and in situ compatibilized nylon‐6/ethylene propylene rubber blends

Melt rheology and morphology of nylon‐6/ethylene propylene rubber (EPR) blends were studied as a function of composition, temperature, and compatibilizer loading. Uncompatibilized blends with higher nylon‐6 content (N90 and N95) and rubber content (N5 and N10) had viscosities approximately intermediate between those of the component polymers. A very clear negative deviation was observed in the viscosity–composition curve over the entire shear rate range studied for blends having composition N30, N50, and N70. This was associated with the interlayer slip resulting from the high‐level incompatibility between the component polymers. The lack of compatibility was confirmed by fracture surface morphology, given that the dispersed domains showed no sign of adhesion to the matrix. The phase morphology studies indicated that EPR was dispersed as spherical inclusions in the nylon matrix up to 30 wt % of its concentration. A cocontinuous morphology was observed between 30 and 50 wt % nylon and a phase inversion beyond 70 wt % nylon. Various models based on viscosity ratios were used to predict the region of phase inversion. Experiments were also carried out on in situ compatibilization using maleic anhydride–modified EPR (EPR‐g‐MA). In this reactive compatibilization strategy, the maleic anhydride groups of modified EPR reacted with the amino end groups of nylon. This reaction produced a graft copolymer at the blend interface, which in fact acted as the compatibilizer. The viscosity of the blend was found to increase when a few percent of modified EPR was added; at higher concentrations the viscosity leveled off, indicating a high level of interaction at the interface. Morphological investigations indicated that the size of the dispersed phase initially decreased when a few percent of the graft copolymer was added followed by a clear leveling off at higher concentration. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 92: 252–264, 2004     

Compatibilizing effects of block copolymer mixed with immiscible polymer blends by solid-state shear pulverization: stabilizing the dispersed phase to static coarsening

A continuous, industrially scalable process called solid-state shear pulverization (SSSP) leads to compatibilization of polystyrene (PS)/high-density polyethylene (HDPE) blends by addition of a commercially available styrene/ethylene-butylene/styrene (SEBS) triblock copolymer. Partial or full compatibilization is characterized by a reduction or elimination of coarsening of the dispersed-phase domains during high-temperature (190 °C), static annealing. In the case of a 90/10 wt% PS/HDPE blend, processing with 3.5 wt% SEBS block copolymer by SSSP yields a coarsening rate that is reduced by a factor of 10 (six) relative to a melt-mixed blend without copolymer (with 3.5 wt% SEBS block copolymer). Addition of 5.0 wt% SEBS block copolymer to the 90/10 wt% PS/HDPE blend during SSSP yields a reduction in coarsening rate by a factor of thirty relative to a melt-mixed blend without copolymer. With an 80/20 wt% PS/HDPE blend, pulverization with 10 wt% SEBS block copolymer yields cessation of coarsening when the average dispersed-phase domain diameter reaches 1.6-1.7 μm. The implications of these results for developing a new, technologically attractive method for achieving compatibilization of immiscible polymer blends are discussed.     

Nanophase morphology and crystallization in poly(vinylidene fluoride)/polydimethylsiloxane‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate) blends

A polydimethylsiloxane‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate) (PDMS‐b‐PMMA) diblock copolymer was synthesized by the atom transfer radical polymerization method and blended with a high‐molecular‐weight poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF). In this A‐b‐B/C type of diblock copolymer/homopolymer system, semi‐crystallizable PVDF (C) and PMMA (B) block are miscible due to favorable intermolecular interactions. However, the A block (PDMS) is immiscible with PVDF and therefore generates nanostructured morphology via self‐assembly. Crystallization study reveals that both α and γ crystalline phases of PVDF are present in the blends with up to 30 wt% of PDMS‐b‐PMMA block copolymer. Adding 10 wt% of PVDF to PDMS‐b‐PMMA diblock copolymer leads to worm‐like micelle morphology of PDMS of 10 nm in diameter and tens of nanometers in length. Moreover, morphological results show that PDMS nanostructures are localized in the inter‐fibrillar region of PVDF with the addition of up to 20 wt% of the block copolymer. Increase of PVDF long period by 45% and decrease of degree of crystallization by 34% confirm the localization of PDMS in the PVDF inter‐fibrillar region. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry     

Compatibilization of nylon 6/liquid crystalline polymer blends with three types of compatibilizers

Polyblends of nylon 6 and liquid crystalline polymer (LCP) (Vectra A 950) are immiscible and highly incompatible, with resultant poor interfacial adhesion, large phase domains, and poor mechanical properties. In the present work, compatibilizing strategies are put forward for blends containing nylon and LCP. Effects of three types of compatibilizers, including ionomer Zn–sulfonated polystyrene (SPS), reactive copolymer styrene–maleic anhydride (SMA), functional grafted copolymers—polypropylene grafted glycidyl methacrylate (PP‐g‐GMA) and polypropylene grafted maleic anhydride (PP‐g‐MAH)—are studied in the aspects of morphology and dynamic mechanical behavior. The addition of compatibilizers decreases the domain size of the dispersed phase and results in improved interfacial adhesion between LCP and matrix. The compatibilization mechanism is discussed by way of diffuse reflectance Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFT), showing the reaction between compatibilizers and matrix nylon 6. Mechanical properties are improved by good interfacial adhesion. The contribution of SMA to mechanical properties is more obvious than that of Zn‐SPS and grafted PPs used. The blending procedure is correlated with the improvement of mechanical properties by the addition of compatibilizer. Two‐step blending is demonstrated as an optimum method to obtain composites with better mechanical properties as a result of a greater chance for LCP to contact the compatibilizer. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 87: 1452–1461, 2003     

Dynamic rheological and morphological study of the compatibility of thermoplastic polyurethane/ethylene–octene copolymer blends

Two grafted ethylene–octene copolymers [POEs; i.e., POE‐g‐maleic anhydried (MAH) and aminated POE (denoted by POE‐g‐NH₂) were used as compatibilizers in immiscible blends of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) and POE. The effects of the compatibilizers on the dynamic rheological properties and morphologies of the TPU/POE blends were investigated. The characteristic rheological behaviors of the blends indicated that the strong interactions between the two phases were due to the compatibilization. Microstructural observation confirmed that the compatibilizers were located at the interface in the blends and formed a stable interfacial layer and smaller dispersed phase particle size. Compared with POE‐g‐MAH, POE‐g‐NH₂ exhibited a better compatibilization effect in the TPU/POE blends. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Nanophase morphology and crystallization in poly(vinylidene fluoride)/polydimethylsiloxane‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate)‐block‐polystyrene blends

An approach to achieve confined crystallization of ferroelectric semicrystalline poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) was investigated. A novel polydimethylsiloxane‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate)‐block‐polystyrene (PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PS) triblock copolymer was synthesized by the atom‐transfer radical polymerization method and blended with PVDF. Miscibility, crystallization and morphology of the PVDF/PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PS blends were studied within the whole range of concentration. In this A‐b‐B‐b‐C/D type of triblock copolymer/homopolymer system, crystallizable PVDF (D) and PMMA (B) middle block are miscible because of specific intermolecular interactions while A block (PDMS) and C block (PS) are immiscible with PVDF. Nanostructured morphology is formed via self‐assembly, displaying a variety of phase structures and semicrystalline morphologies. Crystallization at 145 °C reveals that both α and β crystalline phases of PVDF are present in PVDF/PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PS blends. Incorporation of the triblock copolymer decreases the degree of crystallization and enhances the proportion of β to α phase of semicrystalline PVDF. Introduction of PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PS triblock copolymer to PVDF makes the crystalline structures compact and confines the crystal size. Moreover, small‐angle X‐ray scattering results indicate that the immiscible PDMS as a soft block and PS as a hard block are localized in PVDF crystalline structures. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry     

玄武岩纤维增强PVDF/PP/PETG共混物及性能的研究

通过熔融共混法制备了聚偏氟乙烯/聚丙烯/聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇1,4环己二醇酯（PVDF/PP/PETG）共混物,利用玄武岩纤维对其进行增强改性,并采用扫描电子显微镜、转矩流变仪、维卡软化点测试仪等测试仪器对共混物的形态、黏度、耐热性和力学性能等进行了研究。结果表明,230 ℃时,共混物中PVDF、PP和PETG属两两不相容体系,PVDF和PP呈现连续相结构,而PETG则以球状形态分散在体系中;经玄武岩纤维增强改性后,复合材料的拉伸强度和弯曲强度随着玄武岩纤维含量的增加而增大,且当其含量为30 %（质量分数,下同）时,复合材料的拉伸强度和弯曲强度分别增加到44.0 MPa和67.9 MPa;共混物的维卡软化点从126.7 ℃提高到141.7 ℃。     

Phase morphology evolution and compatibilization of immiscible polyamide 6/polystyrene blends using nano‐montmorillonite

Nanocomposites of organic nano‐montmorillonite (nano‐OMMT)‐filled immiscible polyamide 6 (PA6)/polystyrene (PS) blends were prepared by three different processing methods. Masterbatch M1 of OMMT/PA6 and masterbatch M2 of OMMT/PS were prepared as separate masterbatchs by melt mixing with PA6 or PS, and then either mixed together or each mixed individually with appropriate amounts of PS or PA6, respectively. The effects of nano‐OMMT content and processing method on the structure, phase morphology, and mechanical properties of the PA6/PS/OMMT nanocomposites were investigated by X‐ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and mechanical properties tests. The results showed that the nano‐OMMT by M1 and M2 masterbatches dispersed primarily as exfoliated platelets in the PA6 matrix in the final composites regardless of the method of preparation. A drastic decrease of dispersed PS phase size and a very homogeneous size distribution were observed with the addition of nano‐OMMT. The PA6/PS/OMMT nanocomposites prepared from the M2 displayed the smallest dispersed PS phase size and best distribution of OMMT. The improvement of the mechanical properties of the PA6/PS/OMMT nanocomposites was attributed to the enhanced compatibilization of the immiscible PA6/PS blends by using nano‐OMMT. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2017. © 2017 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Role of poly(lactic acid) in the phase transition of poly(vinylidene fluoride) under uniaxial stretching

The effect of poly (lactic acid) (PLA) on the crystalline phase transition of poly (vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) from α‐ to β‐phase under uniaxial stretching for immiscible PVDF/ PLA blends was investigated. The typical sea‐island structure in the blends was found to facilitate the necking of PVDF and the transition from α‐ to β‐phase due to the local stress distribution during stretching. The crystalline phase transition of PVDF in the blends is temperature‐dependent and is affected by the content of PLA. The highest content of β‐phase, F(β), was achieved in the samples stretched at 60°C, while the effect of PLA content on the crystalline phase transition of PVDF is more complex. F(β) increases slightly when the sample with a PLA content no more than 15 wt % is stretched at 60, 80, and 100°C, and decreases sharply for the sample containing 20 wt % PLA; in addition, the sample containing 10 wt % PLA exhibits the highest F(β) no matter what the stretching temperature is. The mechanism of the crystalline phase transition of PVDF during the stretching is interpreted from energy barrier of the transition from α‐ to β‐phase and the morphological structures in the blends. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2013     

Morphology of compatibilized ternary blends of polypropylene,nylon 66, and polystyrene

The morphologies of a ternary blend of nylon 66 and polystyrene in a polypropylene matrix with and without compatibilization by an ionomer resin (for nylon 66) and a styrene‐block‐ethylene‐co‐butylene‐block‐styrene (SEBS) copolymer (for polystyrene) were investigated by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of stained thin sections. The morphology found with the two compatibilizers (a five‐component mixture) was essentially that of the binary blends of nylon 66/polypropylene and of polystyrene/polypropylene with their respective compatibilizers, indicating no gross interference between the two compatibilization systems. However, several interactions were discerned: 1) an association of the polystyrene with the nylon in the compatibilized blends (partial wetting), 2) a presence of larger particles when both compatibilizers were added to the binary blends, and 3) a possible synergism, in which less of each compatibilizer was needed when they were both present. Polym. Eng. Sci. 46:385–398, 2006. © 2006 Society of Plastics Engineers.     

Crystallization behavior and hydrophilicity of poly(vinylidene fluoride)/poly(methyl methacrylate)/poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) ternary blends

Ternary blends composed of matrix polymer poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) with different proportions of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)/poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP) blends were prepared by melt mixing. The miscibility, crystallization behavior, mechanical properties and hydrophilicity of the ternary blends have been investigated. The high compatibility of PVDF/PMMA/PVP ternary blends is induced by strong interactions between the carbonyl groups of the PMMA/PVP blend and the CF₂ or CH₂ group of PVDF. According to the Fourier transform infrared and wide‐angle X‐ray difffraction analyses, the introduction of PMMA does not change the crystalline state (i.e. α phase) of PVDF. By contrast, the addition of PVP in the blends favors the transformation of the crystalline state of PVDF from non‐polar α to polar β phase. Moreover, the crystallinity of the PVDF/PMMA/PVP ternary blends also decreases compared with neat PVDF. Through mechanical analysis, the elongation at break of the blends significantly increases to more than six times that of neat PVDF. This confirms that the addition of the PMMA/PVP blend enhances the toughness of PVDF. Besides, the hydrophilicity of PVDF is remarkably improved by blending with PMMA/PVP; in particular when the content of PVP reaches 30 wt%, the water contact angle displays its lowest value which decreased from 91.4° to 51.0°. Copyright © 2011 Society of Chemical Industry     

Addition compatibilization of PP/PS blends by tailor‐made copolymers

The thermoplastic polymer blends of commercial interest generally need a phase compatibilization to reduce the interfacial tension, to stabilize the morphology, and to increment the interfacial adhesion. This work deals with the compatibilization of PP/PS blends by addition of a tailor‐made copolymer, which is prepared from the pure homopolymers by a Friedel‐Crafts reaction. This addition compatibilization process comes out as an economic alternative applicable to the recycling of mixed plastics from urban and industrial wastes. The influence of compatibilizer concentration and blending time on the emulsifying effect, morphology, and mechanical properties of the resulting blends are analyzed. The compatibilization process effectiveness is assessed through the improvement in phase adhesion, emulsification and ductility of the compatibilized with respect to the physical blends. An increase of three times in ductility is achieved using very low compatibilizer concentrations (0.5–0.7 wt%). No appreciable detriment in yield strength or modulus is observed in these compatibilized blends. POLYM. ENG. SCI. 46:329–336, 2006. © 2006 Society of Plastics Engineers