Phase I and pharmacologic study of weekly doxorubicin and 1 h infusional paclitaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer

Doxorubicin and paclitaxel both display strong antitumor activity in the treatment of breast cancer. The optimal schedule of this combination, however, remains undefined. In this phase I and pharmacologic study, we administered weekly 12 mg/m2 doxorubicin as a bolus infusion immediately followed by a 1 h 80 mg/m2 paclitaxel infusion to patients with metastatic breast cancer. A total of 119 weekly courses were delivered to seven patients. Grade IV neutropenia was observed in two patients at the first dose level, thus already defining the maximum tolerated dose. Pronounced non-hematologic toxicities were mild neuropathy (grade I: 39%) and stomatitis (grade I: 19%, grade II: 8%). No signs of cardiac toxicity were observed with this dose schedule. Three partial responses were achieved in this group of heavily pretreated patients. The pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel, doxorubicin and Cremophor EL with this schedule were analyzed. Overall, the schedule was well tolerated and combined with its preliminary response rate justifies further evaluation in phase II studies.     

Distributed clinical neurophysiology

We have performed a clinical phase I trial of a combination treatment with paclitaxel given as 3-hour infusion and cisplatin to determine the maximum tolerated dose and the dose-limiting toxicity in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Treatment was repeated every 21 days. Doses administered ranged from 135 mg/m2 paclitaxel/75 mg/m2 cisplatin to 250 mg/m2 paclitaxel/100 mg/m2 cisplatin. Twenty-four patients have been entered into this study. The maximum tolerated dose was determined to be 225-250 mg/m2 paclitaxel/100 mg/m2 cisplatin. The dose-limiting toxicity of this regimen was myelosuppression (granulocytopenia). Neurosensory and neuromotor toxicity was moderate. However, analyses of threshold electrotonus studies indicated subclinical neurotoxicity in most patients. One patient receiving 200 mg/m2 paclitaxel/100 mg/m2 cisplatin developed grade 3 motor-neurotoxicity. Orthostatic hypotension was observed in 8 patients receiving doses of 200 mg/m2 paclitaxel/100 mg/m2 cisplatin or higher. Objective responses were observed at paclitaxel 175 mg/m2/ cisplatin 100 mg/m2 (n = 5; complete response in 1 patient), paclitaxel 200 mg/ m2/cisplatin 100 mg/m2 (n = 3; partial response in 3 patients) and at paclitaxel 225 mg/m2/cisplatin 100 mg/m2 (n = 8; partial response in 1 patient). Eleven additional patients had stable disease. We conclude that paclitaxel administered as a 3-hour infusion followed by cisplatin is an active regimen in advanced head and neck cancer and that orthostatic hypotension may be a potentially significant clinical toxicity.     

Final report of a phase II evaluation of paclitaxel in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial (PA390)

BACKGROUND: A number of single agents have been tested in patients with carcinoma of the head and neck receiving palliative treatment. In general, 15-30% of patients achieve a partial response lasting 3-4 months. Treatment has not been shown to alter survival rates. It is clear that new drugs with potentially greater activity need to be identified. For this purpose, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group conducted a Phase II evaluation of paclitaxel. METHODS: Patients with recurrent, metastatic, or locally advanced, incurable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were eligible. The dose and schedule tested was the maximum tolerable dose of 250 mg/m2 determined from Phase I trials using a 24-hour infusion schedule and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor support. Courses were given at 3-week intervals until progression of disease was documented. Dose modifications were specified for hematologic toxicity and for neurotoxicity. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were registered on study and 30 were eligible. Severe or life-threatening granulocytopenia was the most frequent toxicity observed, occurring in 91% of patients. Prior to response evaluation, one patient died of sepsis and one died of a myocardial infarct. Response was observed in 40% of eligible patients (4 complete and 8 partial responses). The median duration of response was 4.5 months (range, 2-20 months), with a median survival of 9.2 months and a 1-year survival rate of 33%. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that paclitaxel is an active agent for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Studies evaluating alternative infusion schedules and combination regimens currently are underway.     

A phase I study of paclitaxel and 5-fluorouracil in advanced gastric cancer

This is a phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicity of a combination of paclitaxel and 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) in advanced gastric cancer patients. The patients, refractory to the PELF regimen (5-FU, leucovorin, cisplatin, epidoxorubicin), received weekly 5-FU at the fixed dose of 500 mg/m2, and escalating doses of paclitaxel every 3 weeks with a starting dose of 150 mg/m2 given as in 3-h infusion. The dose was escalated by 25 mg/m2 every 3 patients. Fifteen patients entered the study. The upper paclitaxel dose (225 mg/m2) was given to 6 patients. Up to this dose, no severe toxicity (grade 3-4) was recorded. Apart from alopecia, grade 1-2 leukopenia occurred in 5 patients and grade 1-2 neurotoxicity in 2 patients. All patients were evaluable for response (at least 2 cycles): 2 patients achieved an objective response (200 and 225 mg/m2). In 6 patients, treatment resulted in notable relief from symptoms. Out-patient paclitaxel given over 3 h and 5-FU may be combined safely for the treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer. The recommended doses for phase II study are paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 and 5-FU 500 mg/m2.     

Radiotherapy and concomitant weekly 1-hour infusion of paclitaxel in the treatment of head and neck cancer--results from a Phase I trial

PURPOSE: To define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) by describing the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of weekly paclitaxel (PAC) given as a 1-h I.V. infusion in patients with head and neck cancer concomitant to irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with unresectable or incompletely resected head and neck cancer were enrolled into a prospective, dose-escalating Phase I study. Toxicity was graded according to the WHO toxicity score. MTD dose was defined when two out of six patients developed DLT. The starting dose of PAC was 20 mg/m2 once weekly I.V. over 60 min, with a subsequent dose escalation of 10 mg/m2 in cohorts of three new patients. Radiation therapy was administered in three field technique over 6-7 weeks in 2.0 Gy/daily fractions for 5 consecutive days/week up to total doses of 60-70 Gy. RESULTS: From 1994-1996, 18 patients completing three dose levels were included into the study. Altogether, 101 courses of chemotherapy were evaluable for toxicity. On the second dose level (30 mg/m2) one of three patients experienced DLT with Grade IV mucositis. On the next dose level with 40 mg/m2 PAC weekly one patient experienced DLT being prolonged Grade III mucositis. From the following three patients required, two patients showed no DLT. The third patient showed mucositis of WHO Grade 4 and died from hemorrhage caused by a rupture of the a pharyngeal wall. Dose level 2 (30 mg/m2) was repeated and one of the three newly treated patients again suffered from mucositis WHO Grade 4. CONCLUSION: When PAC is given weekly as a 1-h infusion concomitant to radiotherapy, MTD is 30 mg/m2 with mucositis being DLT; hematological and further nonhematological toxicity is mild.     

Exercise testing and prognosis in adult cystic fibrosis

PURPOSE: The objective of our study was to determine the maximum tolerable doses (MTDs) of both paclitaxel and cisplatin when given in a weekly schedule alone or simultaneously with G-CSF in advanced solid neoplasms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced cancer either chemotherapy-naive or resistant to standard treatments received paclitaxel in a three-hour infusion followed by cisplatin, with or without the addition of r-HuG-CSF (5 micrograms/kg s.c. days three to five). The starting doses of CDDP and paclitaxel were 25 mg/m2/week and 45 mg/m2/week, respectively. During the first six courses the dosages of the two drugs were alternately escalated by 20% (CDDP = 5 mg/m2/week, and paclitaxel 10 mg/m2/week) at each step until the appearance of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in one-third or more of the patients enrolled in that cohort. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients with cancer (16 lung, 16 breast, 11 ovarian, 7 head and neck, 1 renal, 1 esophageal, 1 cervical, 1 soft-tissue sarcoma, and 1 of unknown primary), 25 of whom were pretreated, were entered into the study. A total of 439 weekly courses were delivered. In chemotherapy-na?ve patients, the MTDs of cisplatin and paclitaxel were 30 mg/m2/week and 65 mg/m2/week, respectively, in the absence of G-CSF support, which increased to 40 mg/m2/week and 85 mg/m2/week, respectively, when G-CSF was given. There were no toxic deaths in this study. Neutropenia was the main dose-limiting toxicity (100/439 courses), but was seldom severe. Neurotoxicity was quite frequent (18 of 55 patients for the total of 88 courses) but never dose-limiting. It was more frequent and clinically relevant in cisplatin-pretreated patients. Overall 18 patients (eight ovarian, five breast, three lung, and two head and neck) achieved objective responses. CONCLUSIONS: The cisplatin-paclitaxel weekly administration seems a safe, practical and effective therapeutical approach in patients with advanced solid neoplasms. Large phase II trials are warranted to accurately define the efficacy of this schedule in cisplatin-paclitaxel sensitive tumors.     

Hepatitis G virus RNA and hepatitis G virus-E2 antibodies in Dutch hemophilia patients in relation to transfusion history

PURPOSE: Docetaxel is a highly active antineoplastic agent; however, grade IV leukopenia occurs in the large majority of patients treated with a dose of 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Recent experience with weekly paclitaxel has demonstrated a bone marrow-sparing effect when a weekly administration schedule is used. We investigated a weekly schedule of docetaxel in an attempt to alter the toxicity profile and improve the therapeutic index. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with advanced, refractory malignancy entered this phase I trial between October 1996 and June 1997. Docetaxel was administered weekly for 6 consecutive weeks, followed by 2 weeks without treatment. Sequential cohorts of patients were treated at the following dose levels: 20, 25, 30, 36, 43, and 52 mg/m2. Patients were reevaluated after one course (8 weeks); patients with objective response or stable disease continued treatment for a maximum of four courses or until disease progression. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients completed at least one course of therapy. Myelosuppression was not a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at any of the doses tested. Only five episodes of grade III leukopenia occurred (14% of patients, 2% of doses), and no grade IV leukopenia was produced. No grade III or IV thrombocytopenia or anemia was observed. Grade III fatigue and asthenia were observed in all three patients treated at 52 mg/m2/wk and in two of 10 at 43 mg/m2/wk. Other grade III toxicity included acral erythema (n = 1), neuropathy (n = 1), peripheral edema (n = 1), and diarrhea (n = 1). The DLTs of this docetaxel schedule are fatigue and asthenia. Although the maximum-tolerated dose by definition of this study was 43 mg/m2/wk, we selected 36 mg/m2/wk for ongoing phase II studies. CONCLUSION: The toxicity profile of docetaxel is markedly altered when the drug is administered by a weekly schedule. Myelosuppression is mild and uncommon. Fatigue and asthenia are the DLTs; other nonhematologic toxicities, which included peripheral edema and neuropathy, are uncommon, and the arthralgia/myalgia syndrome was not observed. Weekly administration of docetaxel may provide a better tolerated, efficacious use of this drug; further investigation of weekly docetaxel as a single agent and in combination regimens is warranted.     

Phase II trial of paclitaxel and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with pancreatic carcinoma: a Southwest Oncology Group study

PURPOSE: Pancreatic cancer is difficult to treat, with most patients surgically unresectable at the time of diagnosis. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy can offer palliation, but more effective therapy is needed. This trial evaluated the effects of an aggressive schedule of paclitaxel given with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients were required to have a histologic diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with measurable disease and no prior chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Patients had to have performance status of 0 to 2, pretreatment absolute granulocyte count > or = 1,500/microL, and platelet count greater than or equal to the institutional lower limit of normal. Following pretreatment with dexamethasone, diphenhydramine, and cimetidine, patients received paclitaxel at a dose of 250 mg/m2 by 24-hour infusion on day 1, repeated every 21 days. G-CSF was given at a dose of 5 microg/kg/d on days 3 to 18 or until two consecutive absolute neutrophil counts (ANCs) > or = 10,000/microL were obtained. Doses of paclitaxel were modified depending on nadir counts. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were entered onto this study, with six ineligible. For the 39 eligible patients, there was one complete response (CR) and two partial responses (PRs), five stable/no responses, 23 increasing disease, two early deaths, and six patients whose assessment was inadequate to determine response. The response rate was therefore three of 39 or 8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2% to 21%). The median survival time for the 39 eligible patients was 5 months. The most common toxicities were anemia, leukopenia/granulocytopenia, malaise/fatigue, nausea/vomiting, alopecia, thrombocytopenia, paresthesias, and liver function abnormalities. There was one death due to sepsis. CONCLUSION: Single-agent paclitaxel in this dose and schedule has minimal activity in pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients.     

A phase I-II study of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and vinorelbine with filgrastim (rhG-CSF) support in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: We designed a phase I-II trial of three active agents, paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and vinorelbine, in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to: 1) define the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel with filgrastim (G-CSF) support; and 2) determine the overall response rate and median survival of patients treated on this regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We treated cohorts of patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC with ifosfamide 1.2-1.6 g/m2/day x 3 and vinorelbine 20-25 mg/m2/day x 3 and escalating doses of paclitaxel at 100-175 mg/m2 on day 2 with G-CSF support on a 21-day cycle. One prior experimental single-agent chemotherapy regimen was allowed. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients, were enrolled on this trial: 27 on the phase I portion of the study and an additional 29 at the recommended phase II dose (RPTD). Thirteen patients had received prior chemotherapy. Paclitaxel doses of 175 mg/m2 and 150 mg/m2 produced dose-limiting myelosuppression, and the RPTD was determined to be paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 with ifosfamide 1.2 g/m2/day on days 1-3 and vinorelbine 20 mg/m2/ day on days 1-3 with G-CSF support. The overall response rate was 18%, with a median survival of 6.1 months. Six of 35 patients (17%) treated at the RPTD achieved a partial response to therapy. Grade IV neutropenia was observed in 19 of 35 patients at this dose, with eight patients suffering febrile neutropenia. CONCLUSIONS: This non-cisplatin-containing three-drug regimen has substantial toxicity and low activity in advanced NSCLC, and does not seem to improve on prior regimens. It is unclear whether the lack of efficacy relates to an antagonistic reaction between the specific drugs, administration schedule, or to subtherapeutic doses of the individual agents.     

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of paclitaxel: a 3-hour infusion versus a 24-hour infusion

The present study was conducted to compare the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PD) of paclitaxel between Phase I trials of 3- and 24-h infusions and to determine the most informative pharmacokinetic parameter to describe the PD. Twenty-seven patients were treated in a Phase I study of paclitaxel by a 3-h infusion at one of six doses: 105, 135, 180, 210, 240, and 270 mg/m2. Pharmacokinetic data were obtained from all patients. Paclitaxel concentrations were measured in the plasma and urine using HPLC. The pharmacokinetics and PD were compared with those of a Phase I trial of paclitaxel by a 24-h schedule previously performed. The maximum tolerated dose of paclitaxel by a 3-h infusion was determined to be 240 mg/m2. The major toxicities were granulocytopenia, neuromuscular toxicities, and hypotension. Apparent differences in pharmacodynamic relationships for the change in granulocytes with dose, peak concentration, and areas under the concentration versus time curve were observed between the 3- and 24-h schedules. However, the relationship between the duration of plasma concentration above 0.05 microM and the change in granulocytes could be fitted to the same sigmoid maximum effect model in either schedule (P < 0.01). There were no clear relationships between peripheral neuropathy or hypotension and any pharmacokinetic parameters. The pharmacokinetics and PD of paclitaxel were schedule dependent. The duration of plasma concentration above 0.05 microM could be a common pharmacokinetic parameter predicting granulocytopenia for both schedules.     

Intensive weekly chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer using fluorouracil, cisplatin, epi-doxorubicin, 6S-leucovorin, glutathione, and filgrastim: a report from the Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer

PURPOSE: A multiinstitutional trial was performed to confirm the clinical activity, in terms of response rate and toxicity (primary objectives) and duration of responses and survival (secondary objectives), of an intensive weekly regimen in advanced gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable unresectable and/or metastatic gastric carcinoma received 1-day per week administration of cisplatin (CDDP) 40 mg/m2, fluorouracil (5FU) 500 mg/m2, epi-doxorubicin (epi-ADR) 35 mg/m2, 6S-stereoisomer of leucovorin 250 mg/m2, and glutathione 1.5 g/m2. On the other days, filgrastim was administered by subcutaneous injection at a dose of 5 mg/kg. One cycle of therapy consisted of eight 1-week treatments. Patients who showed a response or stable disease received a further 6 weeks of therapy. RESULTS: Of 105 enrolled patients, 11 had locally advanced unresectable disease only; 33 had primary nonresected and metastatic disease; 48 had metastatic disease and primary tumor resected; 10 had locoregional recurrence and metastatic disease; and three had locoregional recurrence only. After one cycle, 18 complete responses (CRs) and 47 partial responses (PRs) were achieved, for an overall response rate of 62% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53% to 71%). Twenty patients had stable disease and 20 progressed on therapy. The median survival duration of all 105 patients was 11 months, with 1- and 2-year survival rates of 42% and 5%, respectively. World Health Organization (WHO) grade III to IV toxicity, in terms of anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and mucositis, was experienced by 40 patients (38%). There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: These data support the results of the pilot study and confirmed the high activity of the regimen, with acceptable toxicity. This schedule deserves evaluation in the adjuvant setting.     

Pharmacokinetic re-evaluation and phase I study of high dose epirubicin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

We performed a phase I trial to evaluate the toxicity and the maximum tolerated dose of high dose epirubicin on a three-consecutive-day schedule on Japanese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Fourteen patients were entered in the study. At least three patients were assigned to each different dose level. Epirubicin was given intravenously daily for three day by bolus injection. The dose was started at 60 mg/m2/course and escalated by 30 mg/m2/course. Granulocytopenia was found to be the dose limiting toxicity with a maximum tolerated dose of 150 mg/m2/course. Thrombocytopenia and non-hematological toxicities were mild and well tolerated. The maximum tolerated dose was lower than that in Europe and Canada. Partial responses were observed in two out of five patients on 150 mg/m2/course. The recommended phase II dose for high dose epirubicin was demonstrated to be 120 mg/m2/course. A further dose-escalating study of epirubicin in conjunction with the administration of granulocyte colony stimulating factor is scheduled for the determination of its antitumor activity in non-small cell lung cancer.     

Phase I study of tauromustine administered in a weekly schedule

Tauromustine was administered orally in weekly doses with interindividual dose escalation to patients with disseminated malignant melanoma. The dose in the first cohort of 6 patients was 20 mg/m2/week. The dose escalation was 5 mg/m2/week. The limit of tolerance was 55 mg/m2/week. 99 patients completed at least 8 weeks of treatment and eight dose levels were evaluated for toxicity. Reversible thrombocytopenia, and to a lesser degree leukopenia, were dose limiting. From a starting dose of 40 mg/m2/week, the long-term tolerated dose was 35 mg/m2/week, thus achieving a considerable increase of dose intensity without a significant increase of toxicity by employing this weekly schedule of tauromustine.     

Vitamin D3, lactose, and xylitol stimulate chromaffin cell proliferation in the rat adrenal medulla

We tested paclitaxel (Taxol) and low dose hydroxyurea as second line therapy in 30 patients with non-small cell lung cancer since both drugs are active against non-small cell lung cancer in other settings, and since hydroxyurea may reverse chemotherapy resistance by disrupting double minute chromosomes. Hydroxyurea 500 mg was given orally each Monday, Wednesday, Friday starting 1 week before paclitaxel, and continuing until removal from study. Paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 was given i.v. over > or = 1 h every 3 weeks with dexamethasone, diphenhydramine, and ranitidine. Patients could have paclitaxel doses escalated to 175 mg/m2 in course 2 and to 200 mg/m2 in course 3, where tolerated. Sixteen males and 14 females were treated. All patients had previously received a single cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimen and 23 had previously received radiotherapy. Twelve patients had adenocarcinomas, six had squamous cell carcinomas, and 12 had large cell carcinomas. Eight patients had Stage IIIb cancers and 22 had Stage IV. Paclitaxel doses were 135 mg/m2 in 56 courses, 175 mg/m2 in 24, and 200 mg/m2 in 15. Treatment was well tolerated. Median granulocyte nadirs were 2.5 (x 10(9)/l) for paclitaxel 135 mg/m2, 1.8 for 175 mg/m2, and 1.3 for 200 mg/m2. No patient developed febrile neutropenia, and none required a dose reduction. Two patients had reversible anaphylaxis. Other toxicities were quite tolerable. They included fatigue, myalgias, dizziness, paresthesias, diarrhea, alopecia, mucositis, flushing, headache, swollen red hands, and anxiety. One patient had a partial remission and 15 had stable disease (including six with minor responses). Median survival was 20 (95% CI, 12-34) weeks, with 19% of patients remaining alive at 1 year from initiation of treatment. This is a well-tolerated regimen with modest activity as second line chemotherapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with cisplatin regimens. Higher doses would be feasible and other strategies are now being explored.     

Weekly paclitaxel and cisplatin with concurrent radiotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase I study

PURPOSE: Both cisplatin (CDDP) and paclitaxel have shown good antitumor activity in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and are able to potentiate the antitumor effects of radiation therapy (RT). This study aimed to determine the maximum-tolerated doses (MTDs) of CDDP and paclitaxel (escalated alternately) when given concurrently with RT and to define the nature of the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with locally advanced NSCLC received six weekly administrations of a CDDP-paclitaxel combination with concurrent local RT. The starting doses of CDDP and paclitaxel were 30 mg/m2/wk and 35 mg/m2/wk, respectively. RT was initially given at the dose of 1.2 Gy twice daily for 5 days per week for 5 weeks (total dose, 60 Gy) and at a single daily dose of 2 Gy for 5 days per week for 6 weeks in the last two cohorts of patients. The drug doses were escalated alternately until DLT occurred in more than one third of the patients in a given cohort. RESULTS: Overall, 25 patients were recruited through five different cohorts. All were assessable for toxicity. Esophagitis was the main toxicity and occurred in 16 of 25 patients (64%) and was grade 3 or 4 in five of them. At step 3 (CDDP 35 mg/m2/wk and paclitaxel 45 mg/m2/wk), two of five patients had to discontinue treatment because of severe esophagitis and one of these died of complications related to grade 4 esophagitis. However, keeping the same doses of chemotherapy and replacing hyperfractionation with a standard single-day fraction, weekly doses of CDDP and paclitaxel of 35 mg/m2 and 45 mg/m2 could be safely administered. Neutropenia was by far the most relevant hematologic toxicity and occurred in 33 of 141 weekly delivered courses, but it was of grade 4 in only four courses. Substantial pulmonary or neurologic toxicity was not observed in this study. Two complete responses (CRs) and 13 partial responses (PRs) were observed, for a 60% overall response rate (95% confidence interval [CI], 39% to 79%). The median survival time was 16 months, with a 66% 1-year survival probability. CONCLUSION: CDDP 35 mg/m2/wk and paclitaxel 45 mg/m2/wk can be safely administered with concurrent standard RT. The use of hyperfractionation is associated with a more frequent occurrence of severe esophagitis and requires a reduction of the CDDP dose to 30 mg/m2/ wk. Only future randomized trials will elucidate which of these two approaches (standard or hyperfractionated RT) is the better option to improve the outcome of patients with locally advanced NSCLC.     

Treatment of advanced adenocarcinomas of the exocrine pancreas and the gallbladder with 5-fluorouracil, high dose levofolinic acid and oral hydroxyurea on a weekly schedule. Results of a multicenter study of the Southern Italy Oncology Group (G.O.I.M.)

BACKGROUND: To date there is no established chemotherapeutic treatment for patients with unresectable locally advanced and/or metastatic carcinomas of the exocrine pancreas or the gallbladder. A multicenter Phase II trial has been performed by the Southern Italy Oncology Group with the aim of evaluating the clinical effectiveness and tolerability of weekly 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in modulation with intravenous (i.v.) high dose levofolinic acid and oral hydroxyurea. METHODS: A total of 70 patients fulfilling the standard eligibility for a Phase II study were enrolled in the trial. Forty patients had advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma and 30 had advanced gallbladder carcinoma. The treatment schedule was: levofolinic acid, 100 mg/m2, in 500 mL of normal saline over 2-hour infusion followed by 5-FU, 600 mg/m2 i.v. bolus, and oral hydroxyurea, 1000 mg/m2, for 1 day every week for 6 consecutive weeks followed by 15 days of rest. RESULTS: Among the 40 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 5 (12.5%; 95% confidence level [CL], 8.5-16.5%) showed a partial response with a median duration of 5.6+ months, and 13 had stable disease. Twenty-two patients progressed. Median survival was 5.8 months. Among patients with advanced gallbladder carcinoma, 9 of 30 had a partial response (30%; 95% CL, 26-34%) with a median duration of 6.5 months, and 8 (27%) had stabilization of disease. Thirteen patients showed progressive disease. Median overall survival was 8 months. Toxicity was mild, with Grade 1 to 2 leukopenia and gastrointestinal toxicity the most frequent side effects. No chemotherapy-related deaths were observed. CONCLUSIONS: 5-FU in modulation with i.v. levofolinic acid and oral hydroxyurea on a weekly schedule is well tolerated by the vast majority of patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic carcinoma of the pancreas or the gallbladder. Although response rate and overall survival for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma are far from acceptable, the 30% overall response rate achieved in patients with advanced gallbladder carcinoma suggests that 5-FU in modulation with levofolinic acid and hydroxyurea is active in this neoplasm. The combination of modulated 5-FU with other antineoplastic drugs seems worthy of clinical testing in further controlled trials.     

Short-course induction chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: This study assessed toxicity, tumor response, disease control, and survival after short-course induction chemoradiotherapy and surgical resection in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung carcinoma. METHODS: Forty-five patients with stage III non-small-cell lung carcinoma received 12-day induction therapy of a 96-hour continuous infusion of cisplatin (20 mg/m2 per day), 24-hour infusion of paclitaxel (175 mg/m2), and concurrent accelerated fractionation radiation therapy (1.5 Gy twice daily) to a dose of 30 Gy. Surgical resection was scheduled for 4 weeks later. Postoperatively, a second identical course of chemotherapy and concurrent radiation therapy (30 to 33 Gy) was given. RESULTS: Induction toxicity resulted in hospitalization of 18 (40%) patients for neutropenic fever. No induction deaths occurred. Of 40 (89%) patients who underwent thoracotomy, resection for cure was possible in 32 (71%) patients. Pathologic response was noted in 21 (47%) patients, and 14 (31%) were downstaged to mediastinal node negative (stage 0, I, or II). At a median follow-up of 19 months, 24 patients were alive, 10 with recurrent disease. Of 21 deaths, 16 were from recurrent disease, three were from treatment, and two were unrelated. Recurrent disease was distant in 21 patients, distant and locoregional in 2, and locoregional in 3. The Kaplan-Meier projected 24-month survival is 49%. Projected 24-month survival is 61% for stage IIIA, 17% for stage IIIB (p = 0.035); 84% for pathologic responders, 22% for nonresponders (p<0.001); 83% for downstaged patients (stage 0, I, or II), 33% for those not downstaged (p = 0.005); and 63% for resectable patients, 14% for unresectable patients (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that short-course neoadjuvant therapy with paclitaxel (1) has manageable toxicity and a low treatment mortality, (2) results in good tumor response and downstaging, (3) provides excellent locoregional control with most recurrences being distant, and (4) has improved the median survival compared with historical controls. Survival was better in stage IIIA patients, resectable patients, pathologic responders, and patients downstaged to mediastinal node negative disease (stage 0, I, or II).     

Phase I study of weekly outpatient paclitaxel and concurrent cranial irradiation in adults with astrocytomas

PURPOSE: Astrocytomas are extremely resistant to currently available treatments. Cranial irradiation is a mainstay of frontline therapy, but tumor recurrence is nearly universal. Paclitaxel has shown antitumor efficacy against astrocytoma cell lines, and is a potent radiosensitizer. For these reasons, we conducted a phase I study of weekly paclitaxel and concurrent cranial irradiation in patients with newly diagnosed astrocytomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with astrocytomas were eligible for this study following initial surgery if they had a Karnofsky performance score (KPS) > or = 60%; normal hematologic, liver, and renal function; and could give informed consent. Beginning on day 1 of treatment, patients received paclitaxel by 3-hour infusion once weekly for 6 weeks, concurrent with standard cranial irradiation. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed on 10 patients. RESULTS: Sixty patients were enrolled; 56 were fully assessable. Forty-eight had glioblastomas (GBMs), 10 anaplastic astrocytomas (AAs), and two astrocytomas. Age ranged from 21 to 81 years (median, 55); KPS ranged from 60 to 100 (median, 70). The paclitaxel dose was escalated from 20 mg/m2 to 275 mg/m2. No clinically significant anemia or thrombocytopenia occurred. Only one patient (175 mg/m2) became neutropenic. Sensory neuropathy was dose-limiting. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 250 mg/m2. Paclitaxel pharmacokinetic profiles in study patients were identical to those of previously reported patients with other solid tumors. CONCLUSION: The MTD of paclitaxel administered weekly for 6 weeks by 3-hour infusion is 250 mg/m2. Since patients with brain tumors often have preexisting neurologic deficits, we suggest 225 mg/m2 as the optimum dose for phase II trials in this group of patients.     

Loss of biological activity due to Glu-->Arg mutation at residue 11 of the B subunit of cholera toxin

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose, toxicities, and potential antitumor activity of edatrexate (E), an antifolate agent with enhanced in vitro antitumor activity as compared with methotrexate (M), when given in combination with vinblastine, doxorubicin, cisplatin, and filgrastim (G-CSF) to patients with advanced malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with advanced malignancies were treated with escalating doses of edatrexate in combination with vinblastine (V), doxorubicin (A), cisplatin (C), and filgrastim (EVAC/G-CSF) following three different subsequently developed schedules. Schedule 1 was patterned after the MVAC regimen, a combination chemotherapy program with activity against different epithelial malignancies, and consisted of E, 40 mg/m2/day, days 1/15/22; V, 3 mg/m2/day, days 2/15/22; A, 30 mg/m2/ day, day 2; C, 70 mg/m2/day, day 2; repeated every 28 days. Schedules 2 and 3 were designed to avoid observed dose-limiting toxicity on schedule 1 consisting of transient elevation of serum creatinine levels and delayed myelosuppression. Schedule 2 consisted of E, 40 or 60 mg/ m2/day, days 1 and 15; V, 3 mg/m2/day, days 2 and 15; A, 30 mg/m2/day, day 2; C, 30 mg/m2/day, days 1 and 2; cycled every 28 days. Schedule 3 consisted of E, 60 to 120 mg/m2/day, day 1; V, 3 mg/m2/day, day 2; A, 30 mg/m2/day, day 2; C, 30 mg/m2/day, days 1 and 2; cycled every 21 days. Filgrastim 5 micrograms/kg/day was given to all patients subcutaneously until the absolute neutrophil count was greater than 10,000/microL postnadir. Three patients were treated on schedule 1, 10 on schedule 2 (four at an E dose of 40 mg/m2/day and six at an E dose of 60 mg/m2/day), and 24 on schedule 3 (six at each of the following E dosages: 60, 80, 100, and 120 mg/m2/day). RESULTS: Dose-limiting toxicities of grade 3 to 4 leukopenia and transient elevation of serum creatinine values were observed in two of three patients treated on schedule 1. A dose-limiting toxicity of grade 3 to 4 leukopenia was noted in two of six patients treated on schedule 2 at an edatrexate dose of 60 mg/m2/day. Two of six patients treated on schedule 3 at an edatrexate dose of 120 mg/m2/day had a dose-limiting toxicity of grade 3 stomatitis (one patient) and grade 3 cytopenia (one patient). Nineteen of 37 patients with evaluable or measurable disease had a response to treatment (response rate 51%, 95% confidence intervals = 35%-67%). Nine of 15 patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer responded, including one complete remission (response rate 60%, confidence intervals = 35%-85%). A median survival of 517 days (confidence interval = 163-808 days) and a 1-year survival rate of 60% (confidence interval = 35%-85%) was seen in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum tolerated dose and the recommended phase II dose of edatrexate is 100 mg/m2/day when administered as part of the EVAC/G-CSF program following schedule 3. Promising antineoplastic activity against non-small cell lung carcinomas was observed, and a phase II study is planned.     

The relationship between AIDS dementia complex and the presence of macrophage tropic and non-syncytium inducing isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in the cerebrospinal fluid

CPT-11 is a camptothecin derivative with a broad spectrum of antitumor activity, both in vitro and in vivo. Like camptothecin, CPT-11 is a selective DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor. Phase I trials were conducted in Europe to determine the dose and schedule for phase II trials. These phase I trials assessed the toxicity of CPT-11 in 235 patients and tested three administration schedules: a single infusion once every 3 weeks; a weekly infusion for 3 out of 4 weeks; and a daily infusion for 3 consecutive days every 3 weeks. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 115 mg/m2 in the daily schedule and 145 mg/m2 in the weekly schedule. When the drug was administered once every 3 weeks, diarrhea became the dose-limiting toxicity at doses above 350 mg/m2. This schedule offered the highest dose intensity and the best tolerability profile, and was the most convenient for outpatient treatment. Finally, using this schedule, concomitant administration of high-dose loperamide allowed the dose of CPT-11 to be increased to 750 mg/m2. An ongoing phase I trial is investigating the combination of CPT-11 and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in various solid tumors. Although the MTD has not yet been reached, preliminary results show no pharmacokinetic interaction between the two drugs, contrary to a previous Japanese study. Based on the results of the three phase I trials, CPT-11 350 mg/m2 as an intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once every 3 weeks was recommended for phase II trials, which started in Europe in 1992. To date, CPT-11 has shown remarkable efficacy in colorectal cancer, even in patients resistant to 5-FU. Interesting results have also been obtained in pancreatic, cervical and lung cancers. Future trials will explore the place of CPT-11 in combination with other cytotoxic agents or radiotherapy.