Long-term treatment of destructive rheumatoid arthritis with methotrexate

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of methotrexate (MTX) treatment in patients with longstanding, progressive, active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had failed one or more disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD). METHODS: Two hundred seventy-one consecutive patients with RA in whom MTX treatment was introduced were followed at regular intervals for up to 108 months. Evaluations included the number of swollen joints, grip strength, patient assessment of pain and mobility, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and hemoglobin. Radiographs of hands and feet were taken once a year and 32 joints were evaluated according to a modified Larsen score. RESULTS: Of the 271 patients, 269 had prior treatment with one DMARD, primarily parenteral gold, and 58% with 2 or more DMARD. MTX was started parenterally in all patients in doses between 15 and 25 mg weekly and continued by oral medication in most of the cases. Eighty-three percent of patients complained of adverse events. The most common side effects were nausea, hair loss, transaminase increase, and stomatitis. In 45 patients (16.5%), MTX was withdrawn because of side effects, mostly during the first year. Sixteen patients (5.9%) died during followup, mainly due to myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, or cancer. After one year, 78.7% and after 5 years 60.3% of the patients were still taking MTX. Number of swollen joints, ESR, grip strength, patient assessment of pain, and mobility improved significantly at all measurement points. Improvement in the swollen joint count and the ESR of over 50% was seen in more than 50% of patients. Inactivation of the disease, defined as < 2 swollen joints, ESR < 20 mm, and no concomitant steroid use, occurred in 8-14% of patients. Steroid intake was significantly reduced. In spite of clinical improvement the modified Larsen score showed a progression in the vast majority of patients. CONCLUSION: Even in patients with longstanding, active, destructive RA who failed one or more DMARD, MTX treatment is well tolerated and improves clinical and biochemical disease activity significantly, while radiographic progression is still present.     

Clinical characteristics of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and methotrexate induced pneumonitis

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical features of methotrexate (MTX) pneumonitis in patients treated for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: The medical records of 284 patients with RA who had been treated with oral MTX (mean followup 33.2 mo) were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: MTX induced interstitial pneumonitis developed in 6 patients (2.1%). The affected patients were significantly older than those without MTX pneumonitis (67.3 +/- 9.8 vs 52.4 +/- 12.6 yrs, respectively; p < 0.005). The cumulative MTX dose ranged from 65 to 580 mg at the time pneumonitis developed. Five of the patients (83%) had preexisting interstitial abnormalities, while only 29 of the 278 patients without MTX pneumonitis (10%) had such abnormalities (p < 0.001). The frequency of adverse effects due to previous treatment with disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) was 66.7% in MTX pneumonitis patients and 14.3% in the other 278 patients (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Advanced age, preexisting interstitial abnormalities, and previous adverse reactions to DMARD may be associated with MTX pneumonitis. Patients with these characteristics require careful monitoring during MTX therapy.     

How Canadian and US rheumatologists treat moderate or aggressive rheumatoid arthritis: a survey

OBJECTIVE: To determine which second line agents Canadian and US rheumatologists use to treat patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: A one page survey was sent by fax or mail to all 263 members of the Canadian Rheumatology Association and 320 members of the American College of Rheumatology (10% random sample weighted by region) known to practice adult rheumatology. The survey asked for first and second treatment preferences in patients with (1) aggressive RA; (2) moderate RA; and (3) aggressive RA failing a trial of methotrexate (MTX) 25 mg. RESULTS: Altogether 231 (87.8%) Canadian and 230 (71.7%) US rheumatologists responded, and 214 responses in each survey were analyzable. In aggressive RA. MTX was the drug of first choice of most Canadian (68.7%) and US (78.5%) rheumatologists. Intramuscular gold was a drug of first choice for 14.5 and 1.9% of Canadians and Americans, respectively. 93.9% of Canadian and 90.2% of US respondents preferred single agents for the treatment of moderate RA. Among US rheumatologists. no clear leader emerged as a single agent alternative for the management of aggressive RA unresponsive to MTX. Most said they would use combination (38.3%) or triple (23.8%) therapy involving MTX plus sulfasalazine and/or hydroxychloroquine. 52.3% of Canadians preferred single agent therapy, with 34.6% choosing gold as an alternative to MTX. CONCLUSION: Canadian and US rheumatologists preferred MTX for the treatment of aggressive RA. Canadian rheumatologists saw a small but significant role for intramuscular gold. No single agent emerged as a clear alternative to MTX among US rheumatologists.     

Safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine as maintenance therapy for rheumatoid arthritis after combination therapy with methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of hydroxychloroquine sulfate (HCQ) to extend the response to combination therapy with HCQ and methotrexate (MTX) and the safety of longterm HCQ maintenance therapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Two-part study consisting of an open label segment evaluating combination HCQ/MTX therapy followed by a double blind segment evaluating maintenance therapy for a total of 60 weeks. First, all patients were treated with HCQ 400 mg/day and MTX 7.5 to 15 mg/week for 24 weeks. Then, responders were randomized into 3 groups: (1) HCQ with MTX as needed for disease flare (n = 40), (2) HCQ 400 mg/day (n = 41), or (3) placebo with MTX as needed for disease flare (n = 40), each for 36 weeks. RESULTS: Clinical disease and laboratory variables improved significantly during initial combination therapy with HCQ and MTX. After MTX withdrawal, HCQ-containing maintenance regimens delayed the onset of disease flare (p = 0.023). There were no unexpected adverse events at any time or between-group differences in the distribution of adverse events during the double blind segment. CONCLUSION: Combination of HCQ and MTX appeared to be effective and well tolerated for 24 weeks. After withdrawal of MTX, HCQ extended the response seen with combination therapy and was well tolerated for 36 weeks. Initial therapy with HCQ and MTX, followed by maintenance HCQ, may be a useful alternative for the treatment of RA.     

TGFbeta-inducible early gene (TIEG) also codes for early growth response alpha (EGRalpha): evidence of multiple transcripts from alternate promoters

OBJECTIVE: To describe changes in antirheumatic medication use by patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) over the 15 years 1981 to 1996. METHODS: Medication use was ascertained every 6 months by mailed Health Assessment Questionnaire in a cohort of patients recruited from the local community (n = 305; mean duration of RA at study entry 14.2 yrs). Patients were treated by 53 rheumatologists and over 200 other physicians during the study. The proportions of patients treated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID), disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD), prednisone, intraarticular corticosteroids, and analgesics were determined in serial cross sectional analyses, and trends in medication use over time were analyzed using linear regression. RESULTS: From 1981 to 1996, the proportion of patients treated with DMARD increased from 32 to 47% (average increase 1.06% each year; p < 0.0001), while the proportion treated with NSAID decreased from 86 to 76% (average decrease 0.57% each year; p < 0.0001). The proportion of patients treated with prednisone remained between 30 and 40%, with a trend toward increasing use over time (average increase 0.2% each year; p = 0.05). In contrast, the proportion treated with intraarticular corticosteroids decreased from 14.4 to 6.7% (average decrease 0.46% each year; p < 0.0001). In 1996, the most prevalent patterns of medication use were the use of NSAID alone (24.4%), use of an NSAID and DMARD (16.3%), and use of an NSAID, DMARD, and prednisone (12.2%). Use of an NSAID as the only antirheumatic medication decreased over time, and the use of DMARD in combination with other medications increased. CONCLUSION: The proportion of patients with RA treated with DMARD increased substantially from 1981 to 1996. This change in practice occurred during the time in which the concept of inverting the traditional therapeutic pyramid became popular, and may reflect a translation among clinicians of the philosophy of "early DMARD use" to "consistent DMARD use," even among patients with RA of moderate or longstanding duration.     

Therapeutic efficacy of multiple intravenous infusions of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibody combined with low-dose weekly methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and safety of multiple infusions of a chimeric monoclonal anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha antibody (cA2) (infliximab; Remicade, Centocor, Malvern, PA) given alone or in combination with low-dose methotrexate (MTX) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. METHODS: In a 26-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial, 101 patients with active RA exhibiting an incomplete response or flare of disease activity while receiving low-dose MTX were randomized to 1 of 7 groups of 14-15 patients each. The patients received either intravenous cA2 at 1, 3, or 10 mg/kg, with or without MTX 7.5 mg/week, or intravenous placebo plus MTX 7.5 mg/week at weeks 0, 2, 6, 10, and 14 and were followed up through week 26. RESULTS: Approximately 60% of patients receiving cA2 at 3 or 10 mg/kg with or without MTX achieved the 20% Paulus criteria for response to treatment, for a median duration of 10.4 to >18.1 weeks (P < 0.001 versus placebo). Patients receiving cA2 at 1 mg/kg without MTX became unresponsive to repeated infusions of cA2 (median duration 2.6 weeks; P=0.126 versus placebo). However, coadministration of cA2 at 1 mg/kg with MTX appeared to be synergistic, prolonging the duration of the 20% response in >60% of patients to a median of 16.5 weeks (P < 0.001 versus placebo; P=0.006 versus no MTX) and the 50% response to 12.2 weeks (P < 0.001 versus placebo; P=0.002 versus no MTX). Patients receiving placebo infusions plus suboptimal low-dose MTX continued to have active disease, with a Paulus response lasting a median of 0 weeks. A 70-90% reduction in the swollen joint count, tender joint count, and C-reactive protein level was maintained for the entire 26 weeks in patients receiving 10 mg/kg of cA2 with MTX. In general, treatment was well tolerated and stable blood levels of cA2 were achieved in all groups, except for the group receiving 1 mg/kg of cA2 alone, at which dosage antibodies to cA2 were observed in approximately 50% of the patients. CONCLUSION: Multiple infusions of cA2 were effective and well tolerated, with the best results occurring at 3 and 10 mg/kg either alone or in combination with MTX in approximately 60% of patients with active RA despite therapy with low-dose MTX. When cA2 at 1 mg/kg was given with low-dose MTX, synergy was observed. The results of the trial provide a strategy for further evaluation of the efficacy and safety of longer-term treatment with cA2.     

Combination therapy of rheumatoid arthritis

The prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is about 0.5-1%. The disease course is variable, but RA causes substantial morbidity and mortality. The effect of conventional therapy for RA, i.e. nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID), glucocorticosteroids and Slow Acting Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (SAARD) including methotrexate, gold salts, anti-malarials, d-penicillamine and salazopyrine, is often suboptimal. Since the aim of treatment is a complete remission, combination therapy, i.e. treatment with two or more SAARDs, may be feasible since an additive/synergistic effect may be obtained. In this paper the literature about the effectiveness and toxicity of combination therapy is reviewed. Only a few randomized, clinically controlled trials have been published. None of them have documented that gold salts, d-penicillamine and azathioprine in combination with other SAARDs are better than monotherapy. However, recent trials have indicated that methotrexate in combination with salazopyrine and hydroxychloroquine or in combination with cyclosporine may cause a better therapeutic effect than methotrexate alone, without additional toxicity. Long term studies of the effect of combination therapy are not yet available.     

Effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on the anticonvulsive activity of valproate and diphenylhydantoin against maximal electroshock-induced seizures in mice

OBJECTIVE: To collect the ratings of American rheumatologists regarding relative short-term and long-term effectiveness of disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and to compare these data with results of a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled clinical trials (RCTs) of these drugs. METHODS: A survey was mailed to 3,200 United States rheumatologists who were members of the American College of Rheumatology during the summer of 1996. The survey was completed by 645 rheumatologists. RESULTS: Methotrexate (MTX) was rated as substantially more effective than any other DMARD after both 1 year and 4 years of therapy. At 1 year, more than 90% of rheumatologists rated MTX as "good or excellent," compared with 35% giving a similar rating to intramuscular (IM) gold, the second-ranked DMARD. At 4 years, MTX was rated as "good or excellent" by 65%, compared with 53% for combinations, 30% for prednisone, and 11% for hydroxychloroquine, the second-ranked single DMARD. These ratings reflect results of long-term observational studies, but differ considerably from a meta-analysis of results of short-term RCTs, in which the efficacy of MTX, sulfasalazine, penicillamine, and IM gold were indistinguishable. CONCLUSION: The ratings of US rheumatologists regarding effectiveness of DMARD therapies are in agreement with observational data, but differ substantially from results of RCTs. These findings suggest that observational studies may yield useful and important information about treatment results, which are complementary to, but not available from, the RCT model. Regulatory agencies should consider long-term observational studies as a part of the evaluation of drugs.     

Progression of joint damage in early active severe rheumatoid arthritis during 18 months of treatment: comparison of low-dose cyclosporin and parenteral gold

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the progression of joint damage in patients with early active severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with cyclosporin or parenteral gold. METHODS: In this open, randomized, multicentre study with a blinded radiological endpoint, 375 patients who had suffered from active severe RA for <3 yr were randomized to be treated for 18 months with low-dose cyclosporin or parenteral gold. The groups were stratified with regard to corticosteroid use. Primary efficacy variables were numbers of erosions, erosion score and the Larsen-Dale joint damage score. RESULTS: Joint damage progressed at similar rates in both treatment arms. In both groups, patients receiving corticosteroids had less X-ray progression. Rheumatoid factor positivity, high swollen joint count, high erythrocyte sedimentation rate and pre-existing X-ray abnormalities predicted progression of joint damage. Although numbers of serious adverse events were similar, more gold patients (n = 65) than cyclosporin patients (n = 45) withdrew from study medication because of adverse events. CONCLUSION: Cyclosporin was comparable to parenteral gold in retarding progression of joint damage and was better tolerated in terms of adherence to therapy. The open label design should be kept in mind when assessing this difference.     

Cyclosporine A in the treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis. A prospective, randomized 24-month study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy, tolerability and safety of cyclosporine A (CSA) in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. METHODS: Patients with an early diagnosis of RA, a disease duration of less than 3 years, and without prior disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment were studied. They randomly received oral CSA (3 mg/kg/day) or oral methotrexate (MTX) (0.15 mg/kg/week). In addition, all patients in both groups received oral prednisone (7.5 mg/day). RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were assigned to the CSA group and 51 to the MTX group. After 24 months of treatment, 48 patients from the CSA group and 48 from the MTX group showed significant clinical improvement. This was evaluated by the duration of morning stiffness, grip strength, the total joint count, joint swelling, and joint tenderness and pain, compared to pre-treatment values. The clinical improvement was also associated with a significant decrease in ESR and CRP values in both groups. No significant radiological deterioration was observed in the CSA patients compared to those treated with MTX after 24 months. Four patients from the CSA group dropped out of the study, two because of a synovitis flare, one because of severe hypertrichosis and one because of severe gingival hyperplasia. Three patients from the MTX group withdrew, one because of disease flare-up and two because of gastrointestinal disturbances. CONCLUSION: Early immunointervention in RA patients appears to be crucial to limit the development of joint damage. Cyclosporine A appears to be effective, well tolerated and safe in the long-term treatment of RA and can therefore be used as a first immunomodulatory drug in the armamentarium for the treatment of RA.     

Up-regulation of neuropeptide Y-Y2 receptors in an animal model of temporal lobe epilepsy

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the incidence and background of clinical relapse (escape phenomenon) during low-dose methotrexate therapy for rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: Seventy one patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were analyzed. They were started on therapy with methotrexate (MTX) between April 1, 1991 and May 30, 1995. Among them, 60 patients showed clinical improvement within 6 months after the start of the therapy and were subjected to the analysis for clinical relapse (escape phenomenon). RESULTS: Twelve patients showed an initial improvement followed by a relapse with increased serum CRP and number of painful joints despite the MTX therapy was continued. Two types of the relapses were seen; (1) early, escape (relapse after an initial brief improvement) in 7 patients, and (2) late escape (relapse after a long-term improvement with MTX therapy) in 5 patients. The early escape was seen at 9.0 +/- 0.7 months after the start of therapy while the late escape was seen at 23.3 +/- 4.8 months. Patients with both types of escape phenomenon had the longer duration of the disease and more advanced stage. There was no relationship between clinical relapse and age, baseline RA activity, MTX dose, or concurrent use of corticosteroids and other disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. The efficacy of MTX for RA was restored by increasing dose of MTX in 11 patients. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that clinical relapse is not rare in RA patients during low-dose methotrexate therapy, but could be improved by increasing dose.     

Differences in the use of second-line agents and prednisone for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis by rheumatologists and non-rheumatologists

OBJECTIVE: To compare the use of methotrexate (MTX), intramuscular (i.m.) gold, hydroxychloroquine, and prednisone for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment among patients managed by rheumatologists and nonrheumatologists. METHODS: Multiple regression analysis to estimate the likelihood of starting treatment and response to treatment for patients managed by rheumatologists and nonrheumatologists. All regression analyses were adjusted for patient demographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Therapy with all agents studied was initiated more frequently for patients with RA with at least some contact with rheumatologists during the year than for those managed strictly by nonrheumatologists. The adjusted odds ratios for starts on these medications ranged from 1.14 for im gold to 15.11 for MTX for patients managed by rheumatologists compared to those managed by nonrheumatologists. However, due to the low frequency of initiation of treatment with most of these drugs for patients managed strictly by nonrheumatologists, only the odds ratio for prednisone reached statistical significance (OR = 2.94, p = 0.0082). In the year after initiation of therapy with these agents, patients managed by rheumatologists experienced better response to treatment than those managed by nonrheumatologists. These differences were statistically significant for MTX (p = 0.0447) and nearly significant for im gold (p = 0.0597). CONCLUSION: These results provide evidence of systematic differences in the propensity of rheumatologists and nonrheumatologists to initiate therapy with these antirheumatic drugs. If the observed differences in initial response to treatment translate into substantial differences in longterm outcomes, then these results suggest that the welfare of patients with RA may be jeopardized by the current trend toward primary care and restricted access to rheumatologists.     

Lymphoma in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: association with the disease state or methotrexate treatment

Although long-term clinical studies have shown no excessive risk of lymphoma in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with methotrexate (MTX), an increasing number of reports of this association continue to appear. We describe two cases, review the cases in the world's literature, and summarize their important characteristics. Possible oncogenic mechanisms are discussed. Most lymphoproliferation cases presented here have features of immunosuppression-associated lymphoma. The immunosuppressed state is attributable to a combination of factors, such as RA itself and the actions of MTX. The risk factors for RA patients to develop lymphoma while on MTX include severe disease, intense immunosuppression, genetic predisposition, and an increased frequency of latent infection with prooncogenic viruses such as Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). The spontaneous remission of lymphomas in eight RA patients after MTX was stopped highlights the likely causative role of the drug in the development of these malignancies. If the clinical situation permits, a period of observation for spontaneous remission after MTX is stopped is advisable. The physicians caring for RA patients on MTX should maintain a high surveillance for signs and symptoms suggestive of lymphoma.     

Life-table analysis of cyclosporin A treatment in psoriatic arthritis: comparison with other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the cumulative probability of taking CsA in comparison to other DMARDs, as well as the reason for discontinuation of each DMARD, in a large cohort of PsA patients. METHODS: We prospectively studied 172 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of PsA who had been admitted to our rheumatological unit since 1984. We collected information about treatment with DMARDs including: number, dose, duration and causes of withdrawal, including side effects or inefficacy. Cumulative survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier test and the differences between these survival curves were determined by the Mantel-Hanszel test. RESULTS: The probability curve of continuing to take CsA was significantly lower than that of MTX (p < 0.046). The rate of adverse effects responsible for stopping DMARD therapy was higher in the CsA group, especially with respect to the antimalarial group (p < 0.014). The most common cause of CsA withdrawal was hypertension. The rate of withdrawal due to inefficacy in the CsA group was not significantly different from those observed in the other groups. Nevertheless, the total frequency of discontinuation due to toxicity and inefficacy in the MTX group was significantly lower compared to the gold salts (p < 0.05) and CsA groups (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Life-table analysis suggests that PsA patients taking CsA are less likely than patients on MTX to continue long term treatment. Therefore CsA, which seems to be less safe than the antimalarials, could be considered a useful drug in the treatment of PsA, but does seem to represent the drug of first choice, particularly when compared to MTX.     

Low-dose methotrexate may cause air trapping in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Both rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and methotrexate (MTX) are reported to be associated with the development of pulmonary disease. To determine whether MTX enhanced the risk of developing abnormalities in pulmonary function in patients with RA, we prospectively studied 31 subjects (12 male, 19 female) with the diagnosis of classic RA for an average period of 4.4 yr (range, 1 to 5 yr). Each subject was placed on low-dose weekly MTX (mean 17 mg, range 2.5 to 40) for control of RA symptoms. Other medications included non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents and prednisone if required for control of arthritis symptoms. No other immunosuppressive therapy was used. Each subject was evaluated by pulmonary function tests (PFT) and chest X-ray initially, and at 1, 2, 3.5, and 5 yr. Chest X-rays obtained initially and at the end of the study period were found to be normal. The percent predicted values for initial PFTs in the study group were within the normal range. From the beginning to the end of the observation period, the following mean changes in lung function were observed: 1.9% increase in TLC, 5.1% increase in residual volume (RV), 1.8% increase in FVC, 0.71% decrease in FEV1, 14.7% improvement in alveolar-arterial oxygen (A-aO2) difference, and a 12.7% increase in single-breath diffusing capacity (DLCO). To determine whether MTX (average dose, weekly dose, or cumulative dose) was significantly related to changes in pulmonary function, we used multivariate techniques to control for the initial measure of lung function while assessing the relationship between MTX and the subsequent measures of lung function.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Response of children with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with and without cranial irradiation: a report from the Children's Cancer Group

PURPOSE: Intensified intrathecal (i.t.) chemotherapy without cranial radiation therapy (CRT) prevents CNS relapse in children with low-risk and intermediate-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). In the current study, high-risk ALL patients who achieved a rapid early response (RER) to induction chemotherapy were randomized to receive intensive systemic chemotherapy and presymptomatic CNS therapy that consisted of either i.t. methotrexate (MTX) and CRT or intensified i.t. MTX alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Children (n = 636) with high-risk ALL (aged 1 to 9 years and WBC count > or = 50,000/microL or age > or = 10 years, excluding those with lymphomatous features) who achieved an RER (< or = 25% marrow blasts on day 7) to induction therapy and lacked CNS disease at diagnosis were randomized to receive systemic therapy with either i.t. MTX and CRT (regimen A, n = 317) or intensified i.t. MTX alone (regimen B, n = 319). RESULTS: Interim analysis in July 1993 revealed 3-year event-free survival (EFS) estimates of 82.1% +/- 4.0% (SD)and 70.4% +/- 4.2% for patients treated on regimens A and B, respectively (P = .004). As of January 1996, outcome had changed: 5-year EFS estimates were 69.1% +/- 3.4% and 75.0% +/- 2.7% for regimens A and B, respectively (P = 0.50). Marrow relapses comprised 57 events on regimen A and 43 events on regimen B. Fewer late events occurred on regimen B. CONCLUSION: For high-risk pediatric ALL patients who show an RER to induction therapy and are treated with systemic Children's Cancer Group (CCG)-modified Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster (BFM) chemotherapy, presymptomatic CNS therapy that consists of either i.t. MTX plus CRT or intensified i.t. MTX alone results in a similar 5-year EFS outcome. Furthermore, intensified i.t. MTX may protect against late bone marrow relapse.     

Adverse effects of low-dose methotrexate therapy in rheumatoid arthritis]

To analyze the possible adverse effects of low dose methotrexate (MTX) therapy, 276 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were examined retrospectively. One hundred and seven patients (39%) experienced 113 adverse events : 57 showed liver dysfunction, 24 gastrointestinal complaints, 13 cutaneous symptoms, 6 respiratory symptoms, and 6 malignancies. Interestingly, 3 patients developed a dry cough without infiltration nor interstitial shadow on chest X-ray. The cough was rapidly resolved by discontinuation of MTX, but it recurred in 1 patient when MTX was re-administered. This finding might suggest a close association between MTX administration and the occurrence of dry cough. Of the 6 patients with malignancies diagnosed during MTX therapy, 2 showed malignant lymphoma, 2 lung cancer, 1 breast cancer and 1 colon cancer. MTX might have an oncogenic potential in RA because the coincidence rate, especially with respect to lymphoma, was significantly higher than estimated in a normal population.     

Lack of interaction between bromfenac and methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE: To compare the pharmacokinetics of methotrexate (MTX) and bromfenac administered separately or coadministered in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Patients received their usual weekly oral dose of MTX on Days 1 and 8 and bromfenac 50 mg every 8 h from Days 4 to 9. On Days 1 and 8 serial blood and urine samples were collected to study the pharmacokinetics of MTX and 7-hydroxymethotrexate (7-OHMTX). Bromfenac pharmacokinetics were studied on Days 7 and 8. Concentrations of the analytes were assayed using validated high performance liquid chromatography methods. RESULTS: Nine patients, 5 women and 4 men, completed the study. No statistically significant changes were observed in any of the pharmacokinetic variables evaluated for bromfenac with or without MTX. Bromfenac also did not alter the pharmacokinetics of low dose MTX. However, some significant changes were observed in the pharmacokinetics of 7-hydroxymethotrexate: a 30% increase in dose normalized area under the serum concentration time curve (mean +/- SD) to 3102 +/- 1397 micrograms.h/l and a 16% decrease in renal clearance to 10.0 +/- 6.7 ml/h/kg. Eight patients had mild or moderate adverse events: most were considered unrelated to the study drug by the investigator. One patient did not complete the study because of moderate hypertension. No patient had clinically important abnormal laboratory test results. CONCLUSION: No clinically significant changes in MTX pharmacokinetics were detected in patients with RA when bromfenac was added to MTX therapy. Although 7-OHMTX concentrations were elevated, the changes were small and unlikely to be of clinical significance. MTX did not alter the pharmacokinetics of bromfenac.     

Factors predicting outcome of rheumatoid arthritis: results of a followup study

OBJECTIVE: To determine prognostic factors in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: One hundred thirty-two women with definite RA were followed yearly from an early phase of the disease (symptoms < 5 years) for a mean duration of 6 years. The prognostic value of the first available clinical and laboratory variables and assessments of functional ability was related to several outcome measures (physician's opinion of disease severity, disease activity, radiological abnormalities, functional ability and number of prescribed 2nd-line drugs) by single predictor analysis and by logistic regression. RESULTS: The variables most predictive for one or more of the outcome measures were number of swollen joints, Ritchie score, health assessment questionnaire score, radiographical abnormalities, positive IgM rheumatoid factor (RF), positive IgG-RF, HLA-DR4, and an elevated percentage serum agalactosyl IgG. The accuracy of predicting outcome was calculated from several combinations of these variables, and varied between 70 and 80%. The accuracy based on a combination of the commonly available variables (number of swollen joints, IgM-RF and the erosion score), closely approximated the maximal accuracy that could be achieved. CONCLUSION: The outcome of RA can be predicted by a combination of variables that are commonly available in the clinical setting.     

Methotrexate therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a life table review of 587 patients treated in community practice

To determine whether methotrexate (MTX) maintains its effectiveness in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the setting of community based private rheumatology practice we used life table analysis to review the combined experience of a group of these practices. Of 587 patients with RA who started to take MTX, total termination rate at 70 months was 24.4% with most terminations prompted by drug toxicity. Older age (greater than 65 years) was associated with higher rates of toxicity. Treatment termination rates varied substantially between rheumatologists. We conclude that MTX therapy for RA is well tolerated and maintains effectiveness for at least 70 months.