Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation for acute respiratory failure in a medical intensive care unit in Singapore

The main advantage of noninvasive ventilation over conventional mechanical ventilation is in the avoidance of endotracheal intubation and its related complications. Currently, the role of noninvasive ventilation in the management of patients with acute respiratory failure is still not firmly established. We conducted a prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of nasal positive pressure ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure. Thirty-three consecutive patients with acute failure in whom intubation and mechanical ventilation were strongly considered were included in the study. They received ventilatory support by means of BiPAP ventilatory support system and nasal mask. Physical findings and laboratory measurements were documented before and at specific intervals after initiation of support. Eighty per cent (24/30) of patients were successfully supported. Successfully supported patients tolerated the device with improved gas exchange, hence avoiding endotracheal intubation. The mean duration of support was 19.2 hours. There were major associated complications, e.g. gastric distention or aspiration.     

Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation: what is its role in treating acute respiratory failure?

Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is a viable option in treating appropriately selected patients with acute respiratory failure. It is often well tolerated, and it avoids endotracheal intubation with its potential complications. Moreover, gas exchange is reportedly improved. Several issues relating to the use of NIPPV are unresolved, however. The optimal interface, best ventilator mode, and patient selection criteria have not been firmly established. Also, studies are needed to compare the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of NIPPV and standard endotracheal ventilation. Despite these unresolved issues, NIPPV clearly represents an important addition to the techniques available in managing acute respiratory failure. Except in situations in which immediate endotracheal intubation is required, it may become first-line therapy in elderly patients in whom resuscitation status is unsettled.     

Noninvasive mechanical ventilation in a patient with respiratory failure after hematopoietic progenitor transplantation

Respiratory failure requiring orotracheal intubation (OTI) and mechanical ventilation (MV) is almost always a fatal complication in patients who undergo hematopoietic progenitor transplantation (HPT). We present the case of a woman who suffered respiratory failure with bilateral infiltrates on a chest X-ray taken on day +14 following autologous bone marrow transplantation. We managed the patient satisfactorily with noninvasive ventilation, avoiding OTI. We believe that patients with non-progressive pulmonary lesions and without multiple system organ failure, may be correctly managed with noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV).     

Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation via face mask. First-line intervention in patients with acute hypercapnic and hypoxemic respiratory failure

OBJECTIVES: We have previously reported our experience with noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) via face mask in a small group of selected patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). NPPV was frequently effective (70% success rate) in correcting gas exchange abnormalities and in avoiding endotracheal intubation (ETI); NPPV also had a low rate of complications. We have evaluated the clinical application of NPPV as first-line intervention in patients with hypercapnic and short-term hypoxemic ARF. A dedicated respiratory therapist conducted an educational program with physicians-in-training rotating through the medical ICUs of a university medical center and supervised implementation of a simplified management protocol. Over 24 months, 164 patients with heterogeneous forms of ARF received NPPV. We report on the effectiveness of NPPV in correcting gas exchange abnormalities, in avoiding ETI, and associated complications, in different conditions precipitating ARF. PATIENT POPULATION: One hundred fifty-eight patients completed the study. Forty-one had hypoxemic ARF, 52 had hypercapnic ARF, 22 had hypercapnic acute respiratory insufficiency (ARI), 17 had other forms of ARF, and 26 with advanced illness had ARF and refused intubation. Twenty-five percent of the patients developed ARF after extubation. INTERVENTION: Mechanical ventilation was delivered via a face mask. Initial ventilatory settings were continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) mode, 5 cm H2O, with pressure support ventilation of 10 to 20 cm H2O titrated to achieve a respiratory rate less than 25 breaths/min and an exhaled tidal volume of 7 mL/kg or more. Ventilator settings were adjusted following arterial blood gases (ABG) results. RESULTS: The mean duration of NPPV was 25 +/- 24 h. When the 26 patients with advanced illness are excluded, NPPV was effective in improving or correcting gas exchange abnormalities in 105 patients (80%) and avoiding ETI in 86 (65%). Failure to improve ABG values was the reason for ETI in 20 of 46 (43%). The overall average predicted and actual mortality were 32% and 16%, respectively. Survival was 93% in non-intubated patients and 79% in intubated patients. NPPV was effective in lessening dyspnea throughout treatment in all but seven patients. Complications developed in 24 patients (16%). In patients with hypercapnic ARF, nonresponders had a higher PaCO2 at entrance (91.5 +/- 4.2 vs 80 +/- 1.5; p < 0.01). In patients with hypercapnic ARF and ARI, arterial blood gases response (pH and PaCO2) within 2 h of NPPV predicted success (p < 0.0001). None of the entrance parameters predicted need for ETI. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that application of NPPV in clinical practice is an effective and safe alternative to ETI in many hemodynamically stable patients with hypercapnic ARF and in those with hypoxemic ARF in whom the clinical condition can be readily reversed in 48 to 72 h. An educational and supervision program is essential to successfully implement this form of therapy.     

A comparison of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation and conventional mechanical ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: The role of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation delivered through a face mask in patients with acute respiratory failure is uncertain. We conducted a prospective, randomized trial of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation as compared with endotracheal intubation with conventional mechanical ventilation in 64 patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure who required mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: Within the first hour of ventilation, 20 of 32 patients (62 percent) in the noninvasive-ventilation group and 15 of 32 (47 percent) in the conventional-ventilation group had an improved ratio of the partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2:FiO2) (P=0.21). Ten patients in the noninvasive-ventilation group subsequently required endotracheal intubation. Seventeen patients in the conventional-ventilation group (53 percent) and 23 in the noninvasive-ventilation group (72 percent) survived their stay in the intensive care unit (odds ratio, 0.4; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.1 to 1.4; P=0.19); 16 patients in the conventional-ventilation group and 22 patients in the noninvasive-ventilation group were discharged from the hospital. More patients in the conventional-ventilation group had serious complications (66 percent vs. 38 percent, P=0.02) and had pneumonia or sinusitis related to the endotracheal tube (31 percent vs. 3 percent, P=0.003). Among the survivors, patients in the noninvasive-ventilation group had shorter periods of ventilation (P=0.006) and shorter stays in the intensive care unit (P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute respiratory failure, noninvasive ventilation was as effective as conventional ventilation in improving gas exchange and was associated with fewer serious complications and shorter stays in the intensive care unit.     

Comparative physiologic effects of noninvasive assist-control and pressure support ventilation in acute hypercapnic respiratory failure

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of noninvasive assist-control ventilation (ACV) and pressure support ventilation (PSV) by nasal mask on respiratory physiologic parameters and comfort in acute hypercapnic respiratory failure (AHRF). DESIGN: A prospective randomized study. SETTING: A medical ICU. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Fifteen patients with COPD and AHRF were consecutively and randomly assigned to two noninvasive ventilation (NIV) sequences with ACV and PSV mode, spontaneous breathing (SB) via nasal mask being used as control. ACV and PSV settings were always subsequently adjusted according to patient's tolerance and air leaks. Fraction of inspired oxygen did not change between the sequences. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: ACV and PSV mode strongly decreased the inspiratory effort in comparison with SB. The total inspiratory work of breathing (WOBinsp) expressed as WOBinsp/tidal volume (VT) and WOBinsp/respiratory rate (RR), the pressure time product (PTP), and esophageal pressure variations (deltaPes) were the most discriminant parameters (p<0.001). ACV most reduced WOBinsp/VT (p<0.05), deltaPes (p<0.05), and PTP (0.01) compared with PSV mode. The surface diaphragmatic electromyogram activity was also decreased >32% as compared with control values (p<0.01), with no difference between the two modes. Simultaneously, NIV significantly improved breathing pattern (p<0.01) with no difference between ACV and PSV for VT, RR, minute ventilation, and total cycle duration. As compared to SB, respiratory acidosis was similarly improved by both modes. The respiratory comfort assessed by visual analog scale was less with ACV (57.23+/-30.12 mm) than with SB (75.15+/-18.25 mm) (p<0.05) and PSV mode (81.62+/-25.2 mm) (p<0.01) in our patients. CONCLUSIONS: During NIV for AHRF using settings adapted to patient's clinical tolerance and mask air leaks, both ACV and PSV mode provide respiratory muscle rest and similarly improve breathing pattern and gas exchange. However, these physiologic effects are achieved with a lower inspiratory workload but at the expense of a higher respiratory discomfort with ACV than with PSV mode.     

Comparison of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation with standard medical therapy in hypercapnic acute respiratory failure

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of standard medical therapy (ST) and noninvasive mechanical ventilation additional to standard medical therapy in hypercapnic acute respiratory failure (HARF). DESIGN: Single center, prospective, randomized, controlled study. SETTING: Pulmonary medicine directed critical care unit in a university hospital. PATIENTS: Between March 1993 and November 1996, 30 HARF patients were randomized to receive ST or noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) in addition to ST. INTERVENTIONS: NPPV was given with an air-cushioned face via a mechanical ventilator (Puritan Bennett 7200) with initial setting of 5 cm H2O continuous positive airway pressure and 15 cm H2O pressure support. RESULTS: At the time of randomization, patients in the ST group had (mean+/-SD) PaO2 of 54+/-13 mm Hg, PaCO2 of 67+/-11 mm Hg, pH of 7.28+/-0.02, and respiratory rate of 35.0+/-5.8 breaths/min. Patients in the NPPV group had PaO2 of 55+/-14, PaCO2 of 69+/-15, pH of 7.27+/-0.07, and respiratory rate of 34.0+/-8.1 breaths/min. With ST, there was significant improvement of only respiratory rate (p < 0.05). However, with NPPV, PaO2 (p < 0.001), PaCO2 (p < 0.001), pH (p < 0.001), and respiratory rate (p < 0.001) improved significantly compared with baseline. Six hours after randomization, pH (p < 0.01) and respiratory rate (p < 0.01) in NPPV patients were significantly better than with ST. Hospital stay for NPPV vs ST patients was, respectively, 11.7+/-3.5 and 14.6+/-4.7 days (p < 0.05). One patient in the NPPV group required invasive mechanical ventilation. The conditions of six patients in the ST group deteriorated and they were switched to NPPV; this was successful in four patients, two failures were invasively ventilated. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that early application of NPPV in HARF patients facilitates improvement, decreases need for invasive mechanical ventilation, and decreases the duration of hospitalization.     

Outcomes of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation in patients with acute hypercapnia complicating chronic respiratory failure]

We used noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation to treat hypercapnea due to acute exacerbations of chronic respiratory failure (21 episodes in 19 patients; COPD, 4; pulmonary tuberculosis sequelae, 4; silicosis, 3; silicotuberculosis, 3; bronchiectasis, 3; others, 2). All patients had acute onsets of severe hypercapnea (PaCO2 > 45 Torr), acute decreases in pH (< 7.35), and tachypnea, paradoxical breathing or both. During the first 2 to 4 hours of bi-level positive airway pressure, PaCO2 decreased from 72 to 61 Torr (p < 0.0005), pH increased from 7.26 to 7.31 (p < 0.001), and respiratory rate decreased from 30 to 25 breaths/min (p < 0.005). In three cases leakage of air through the mouth prevented improvement in the patients' conditions, but in two of those a face mask was then used successfully. In 17 of the 21 episodes (81%) gas exchange improved and intubation was not necessary. In those 17, the mean duration of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation was 6.3 days. We conclude that noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation can improve gas exchange in patients with acute hypercapnea complicating chronic respiratory failure.     

Noninvasive pressure support ventilation in COPD patients with postextubation hypercapnic respiratory insufficiency

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who have been intubated and mechanically ventilated may prove difficult to wean. Noninvasive ventilation may be used in an attempt to avoid new endotracheal intubation. The efficacy of administration of noninvasive pressure support ventilation was evaluated in 30 COPD patients with postextubation hypercapnic respiratory insufficiency, compared with 30 historically matched control patients who were treated conventionally. Patients were included in the study if, within 72 h postextubation, they presented with respiratory distress, defined as the combination of a respiratory frequency >25 breaths x min(-1), an increase in the arterial carbon dioxide tension (Pa,CO2) of at least 20% compared with the value measured after extubation, and a pH <7.35. Noninvasive pressure support ventilation was effective in correcting gas exchange abnormalities. The use of noninvasive ventilation significantly reduced the need for endotracheal intubation: 20 of the 30 patients (67%) in the control group required endotracheal intubation, compared with only six of the 30 patients (20%) in the noninvasive-ventilation group (p<0.001). In-hospital mortality was not significantly different between the two groups, but the mean duration of ventilatory assistance for the treatment of the postextubation distress, and the length of intensive care unit stay related to this event, were both significantly shortened by noninvasive ventilation (p<0.01). In conclusion, noninvasive ventilation may be used in the management of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and postextubation hypercapnic respiratory insufficiency.     

Intravenous naloxone in acute respiratory failure

A 58-year-old man presented with acute on chronic respiratory failure. In the acute stage of his illness an infusion of the opiate antagonist naloxone caused an improvement in oxygen saturation as measured by ear oximetry from 74% to 85%, while a saline infusion resulted in a return of oxygen saturation to the original value. When he had recovered from the acute episode the same dose of naloxone had no effect on oxygen saturation. These findings suggest that in acute respiratory failure there may be overproduction of, or increased sensitivity to, endorphins.     

Effects of support pressure ventilation with facial mask in patients with chronic respiratory failure in acute decompensation

BACKGROUND: In previous nonrandomized studies the efficacy of ventilation with back up pressure with face mask (BUPM) in the treatment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in acute decompensation has been demonstrated. This study analyzes the acute effects and the clinical efficacy of BUPM in a group of patients with COPD in acute respiratory failure comparing the same with conventional therapy (CONV). METHODS: A prospective randomized study including patients with COPD in acute decompensation was carried out comparing treatment with BUPM (n = 9) with CONV treatment (n = 9). Back up pressure was fixed at 20 cmH2O. Acute gasometric effects were analyzed as well as the need for intratracheal intubation, mortality and hospital stay. RESULTS: No clinical or gasometric differences were found between either group of patients upon admission. Only the patients of the BUPM group presented a significant improvement from gaseous exchange and respiratory frequency from the first hour of treatment. Three of the nine patients (33%) of the BUPM group and nine of the CONV group of patients (100%) required intubation and mechanical ventilation (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Back up pressure face mask is the technique of choice in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in acute decompensation given that this technique leads to a rapid and significant improvement of gaseous exchange and avoids the need for intubation and mechanical ventilation in most of these patients.     

Noninvasive ventilation in intensive care

Non-invasive ventilation has been in use for many years to provide long-term home ventilatory support to patients with chronic respiratory failure. In recent years, it has emerged on the intensive care scene as a means of avoiding intubation in acute respiratory failure. The results of several studies indicate that such an approach can lead to a reduction in mortality and duration of hospital stay compared to conventional mechanical ventilation with endotracheal intubation. The purpose of this article is to explore the various ventilatory techniques available, the choice of respirator and ventilatory mode in various clinical conditions, and to discuss some of the logistics involved in the optimal use of this technique.     

Noninvasive ventilation in neuromuscular disease

The treatment of respiratory failure in patients who have NMD continues to be an evolving process. Negative-pressure ventilation, once prominent in the 1940s and 1950s, gave way to intermittent positive-pressure ventilation with tracheostomy or endotracheal tubes in the 1960s. Now there is a resurgence of noninvasive ventilation, brought about by innovative modes of positive pressure delivered through nasal and facial masks. Although frequently relegated to second-line choices, negative-pressure devices still offer a practical treatment alternative as patient preference still plays a role in selecting a proper mode of ventilation. Studies have shown that noninvasive ventilation can prevent or reverse respiratory failure and improve quality of life and longevity. Despite the seemingly widespread acceptance of noninvasive ventilation in the treatment of respiratory failure, physicians still appear reluctant to use ventilatory assistance in the neuromuscular arena. In 1985, a survey found that respiratory support systems were utilized routinely in only 33% of the 132 responding Muscular Dystrophy Association (MDA) clinics. Bach recently surveyed 273 MDA clinic directors and co-directors from 167 clinics, to evaluate their current use of mechanical ventilation. Ventilatory assistance was recommended and used electively in only 43 (26%) of the 167 clinics. Furthermore, it was the policy in 68 of the clinics to discourage the use of mechanical ventilation. Even more importantly, only 2 physicians who discouraged the use of mechanical ventilation were familiar with the newest noninvasive methods of ventilatory support. Sadly, although our methodologies in the treatment of respiratory failure continue to improve, physician practice has lagged behind. Physicians who treat patients who have NMD need to become cognizant of these new techniques and incorporate them into their present therapeutic armamentarium.     

Significance of arrhythmias in acute respiratory failure

Arrhythmias are as likely to strike patients with acute respiratory failure as patients with acute myocardial infarction. Both supraventricular and ventricular types were detected in half or more of the patients in two recent studies. Ventricular arrhythmias have a particularly bleak prognosis, since they often deteriorate into ventricular fibrillation or cardiac arrest. The exact causes of these arrhythmias are still a mystery, but metabolic abnormalities associated with respiratory failure are highly suspect. These disturbances can disrupt the transmembrane action potential of cardiac conducting tissue, causing electrophysiologic phenomena known to trigger arrhythmias. Until a specific etiology is confirmed, treatment should focus on identifying and correcting possible metabolic causes. Congestive heart failure--itself a cause of arrhythmias--also should be treated. Cardioversion and antiarrhythmic drugs should be used only in life-threatening situations.     

Arterial oxygenation does not predict the outcome of patients with acute respiratory failure needing mechanical ventilation

One hundred and eighteen patients consecutively submitted to mechanical ventilation during a one year period, and admitted to the Respiratory Intensive Care Unit of the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, were prospectively studied in order to define the importance of hypoxaemia as a predictor of mortality. Using a discriminant multivariate analysis, the following variables were selected as the best predictors of outcome: 1) the number of associated complications (NAC) on admission; 2) the simplified acute physiologic score (SAPS); 3) oxygenation index (PAO2-AaPO2)/PAO2 + 0.014 positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP); and 4) the age of the patients. Using these predictors, 84% of the patients were accurately classified as survivors or as nonsurvivors. The partial contribution of each predictor to the model was also assessed using a logistic regression, by eliminating each single predictor and each possible pair of predictors. Using this means of analysis, the NAC and SAPS were the only predictors of mortality. The inclusion of short-term mechanically-ventilated patients did not bias the accuracy of prediction.