Objective
To evaluate the effect of an antismoking advertisement on young people''s perceptions of smoking in movies and their intention to smoke.Subjects/setting
3091 cinema patrons aged 12–24 years in three Australian states; 18.6% of the sample (n = 575) were current smokers.Design/intervention
Quasi‐experimental study of patrons, surveyed after having viewed a movie. The control group was surveyed in week 1, and the intervention group in weeks 2 and 3. Before seeing the movie in weeks 2 and 3, a 30 s antismoking advertisement was shown, shot in the style of a movie trailer that warned patrons not to be sucked in by the smoking in the movie they were about to see.Outcomes
Attitude of current smokers and non‐smokers to smoking in the movies; intention of current smokers and non‐smokers to smoke in 12 months.Results
Among non‐smokers, 47.8% of the intervention subjects thought that the smoking in the viewed movie was not OK compared with 43.8% of the control subjects (p = 0.04). However, there was no significant difference among smokers in the intervention (16.5%) and control (14.5%) groups (p = 0.4). A higher percentage of smokers in the intervention group indicated that they were likely to be smoking in 12 months time (38.6%) than smokers in the control group (25.6%; p<0.001). For non‐smokers, there was no significant difference in smoking intentions between groups, with 1.2% of intervention subjects and 1.6% of controls saying that they would probably be smoking in 12 months time (p = 0.54).Conclusions
This real‐world study suggests that placing an antismoking advertisement before movies containing smoking scenes can help to immunise non‐smokers against the influences of film stars'' smoking. Caution must be exercised in the type of advertisement screened as some types of advertising may reinforce smokers'' intentions to smoke.In the past decade, tobacco companies have devised increasingly innovative and aggressive strategies for attracting consumers.1,2 Product placement in films popular with young people has been the focus of comment and criticism by numerous international health groups.Depictions of smoking are common in films3 and have decreased in recent decades.4 Sargent et al5 documented an overall increase in the depiction of smoking in films in the 1990s that seemed to coincide with restrictions in advertising.6 Lead characters portrayed as smokers are often likeable, rebellious, attractive and/or successful.7 Role models with such characteristics are often used in tobacco advertising.8 Escamilla et al9 analysed the portrayal of smoking in Hollywood films and found that smoking was highly prevalent in films featuring popular actresses.10 McIntosh et al11 compared Hollywood''s depiction of smokers to real‐world demographics on smoking and found that smoking scenes in movies tend to ignore the negative consequences of smoking, a finding confirmed by Dalton et al12 in 2002.There is mounting evidence linking Hollywood''s depiction of smoking in movies and adolescents'' attitudes to smoking and their smoking behaviour. Tickle et al13 showed that adolescents whose favourite movie stars use tobacco on screen are significantly more likely to be at a more advanced stage of smoking uptake and to have more favourable attitudes towards smoking than adolescents who choose non‐smoking stars. Studies14,15,16,17,18 provide even stronger evidence that viewing smoking in movies promotes smoking initiation among adolescents. A cohort study by Dalton et al19 in 2003 suggests that viewing smoking in movies strongly predicts whether or not adolescents initiate smoking and the effect increases significantly with greater exposure.Prominent researchers and public health advocates have called for action to reduce the impact of positive depictions of smoking in the media, including feature films screened in cinemas.20A Californian study21 suggested that young people can be immunised against the influences of film stars smoking by showing a strong antismoking advertisement before those films that contain smoking scenes. A 2004 Australian study22 supported these findings. The findings of Pechmann and Shih21 and Edwards et al22 support the psychological Theory of Reasoned Action,23,24 which states that the strength of a person''s intention to behave in a certain way is a function of attitudes towards the behaviour and the influence of general subjective norms on the behaviour. According to this theory, an antismoking advertisement may alter the positive attitudes towards smoking that are portrayed in movies and elicit more realistic normative perceptions of the practice of smoking. This should theoretically alter the viewer''s intention to smoke and subsequently reduce their likelihood of smoking in the future. The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion25 suggests that attitude change can be either via the central route that utilises deliberate information processing to assess an issue or via the peripheral route that takes less effort and may even be subliminal. This model predicts that smoking scenes in movies influence young people via the peripheral route. An antismoking advertisement attempts to change attitudes through the central route that, according to the theory, is more enduring and more likely to lead to long‐term behavioural change.Cinema attendance and viewing films rated R under the US classification system increases exposure to onscreen depictions of smoking.26 The majority of young people, including those of varied cultural background, attend the cinema on a regular basis.27,28 A significant advantage in using this medium for an antismoking campaign is the potential to reach a large number of young people in a cost‐effective manner.21, 29This paper evaluates the use of this approach in an intervention conducted in a real‐world cinema setting in Australia. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of an antismoking advertisement on young people''s perceptions of smoking in the following movie and their intention to smoke. It was hypothesised that when an antismoking advertisement is shown before a movie containing smoking scenes, viewers will be (1) less likely to approve of the smoking and (2) less likely to report an intention to smoke in the future. This study expands on the first real‐world cinema study of the effect of an antismoking advertisement on attitudes to smoking in movies and intention to smoke conducted by Edwards et al in 2004. It samples a larger, more geographically and culturally diverse population of both males and females with a broader age range. It also evaluates a very different type of antismoking advertisement that does not include the health effects of smoking or a quit message. 相似文献Study selection: Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of community based tobacco control interventions, and all the primary studies included in one of these reviews.
Data extraction: Reviews and primary studies were assessed for intent to assess the social distribution of intervention effects, information about the social inclusiveness or targeting of interventions, baseline sociodemographic data collected on participants, and estimates of effect size stratified by sociodemographic variables.
Data synthesis: Only one review aimed to examine outcomes stratified by sex, age or socioeconomic status, and these aims were only achieved with respect to sex. Sociodemographic data about participants were frequently collected in primary studies, but not used to compare intervention effects between social groups.
Conclusions: There may be scope for using existing research more effectively to contribute to evidence based policy to reduce social inequalities in smoking—by explicitly seeking stratified outcome data in new systematic reviews, by re-analysing original datasets, and/or by meta-analysis of individual participant data.
相似文献