Carbon dioxide‐in‐water foams stabilized with nanoparticles and surfactant acting in synergy

Synergistic interactions at the interface of nanoparticles (bare colloidal silica) and surfactant (caprylamidopropyl betaine) led to the generation of viscous and stable CO₂‐in‐water (C/W) foams with fine texture at 19.4 MPa and 50°C. Interestingly, neither species generated C/W foams alone. The surfactant became cationic in the presence of CO₂ and adsorbed on the hydrophilic silica nanoparticle surfaces resulting in an increase in the carbon dioxide/water/nanoparticle contact angle. The surfactant also adsorbed at the CO₂–water interface, reducing interfacial tension to allow formation of finer bubbles. The foams were generated in a beadpack and characterized by apparent viscosity measurements both in the beadpack and in a capillary tube viscometer. In addition, the macroscopic foam stability was observed visually. The foam texture and viscosity were tunable by controlling the aqueous phase composition. Foam stability is discussed in terms of lamella drainage, disjoining pressure, interfacial viscosity, and hole formation. © 2013 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 59: 3490–3501, 2013     

Molecular dynamics simulation of the synergistic effect of a compound surfactant on the stability of CO2 oil-based foam

It is of great significance to study the stability of foams in the petroleum industry. Therefore, the stability mechanism of Span 20, the fluorinated surfactant FCO-80 and their mixture FS in a CO₂ oil-based foam system were studied by molecular simulation. The sandwich model of CO₂ oil-based foam was constructed to reveal the stability of the foam system from the microscopic perspective. The result shows that under the synergistic effect of Span 20 and FCO-80, the oil–CO₂ distance of the FS foam system and the coordination number of oil molecules are larger than those of Span 20 and FCO-80 foam system. In FS foam system, the diffusion coefficients of CO₂ molecules are small, and the surface tension is reduced, which can improve the stability of foam. The results can supplement previous experimental results on the stability of oil-based foam.     

Stabilization of natural gas foams using different surfactants at high pressure and high temperature conditions

Natural gas foam can be used for mobility control and channel blocking during natural gas injection for enhanced oil recovery, in which stable foams need to be used at high reservoir temperature, high pressure and high water salinity conditions in field applications. In this study, the performance of methane (CH₄) foams stabilized by different types of surfactants was tested using a high pressure and high temperature foam meter for surfactant screening and selection, including anionic surfactant (sodium dodecyl sulfate), non-anionic surfactant (alkyl polyglycoside), zwitterionic surfactant (dodecyl dimethyl betaine) and cationic surfactant (dodecyl trimethyl ammonium chloride), and the results show that CH₄-SDS foam has much better performance than that of the other three surfactants. The influences of gas types (CH₄, N₂, and CO₂), surfactant concentration, temperature (up to 110°C), pressure (up to 12.0 MPa), and the presence of polymers as foam stabilizer on foam performance was also evaluated using SDS surfactant. The experimental results show that the stability of CH₄ foam is better than that of CO₂ foam, while N₂ foam is the most stable, and CO₂ foam has the largest foam volume, which can be attributed to the strong interactions between CO₂ molecules with H₂O. The foaming ability and foam stability increase with the increase of the SDS concentration up to 1.0 wt% (0.035 mol/L), but a further increase of the surfactant concentration has a negative effect. The high temperature can greatly reduce the stability of CH₄-SDS foam, while the foaming ability and foam stability can be significantly enhanced at high pressure. The addition of a small amount of polyacrylamide as a foam stabilizer can significantly increase the viscosity of the bulk solution and improve the foam stability, and the higher the molecular weight of the polymer, the higher viscosity of the foam liquid film, the better foam performance.     

Comparative Investigation of Dynamic Foam Behavior of Air–Water and CO2–Water Systems

The purpose of this study was to understand and compare the dynamic foam behavior of the surfactant Tween‐20 in air–water and CO₂–water systems. The foam height in the CO₂–water system was less than that in the air–water system, but the foam stability was better in the CO₂–water system. The effect of temperature on axial dye displacement and foam bubble size was studied, where the foam generation ability of the surfactant was directly proportional to the temperature, while the foaminess was inversely proportional. The observed highest foam volume for the air–water system was 3922 ± 181 cm³ and for the CO₂–water system 3195 ± 181 cm³ at 5.0 g L^–1 of surfactant at air flow rate of 1 liter per minute (LPM) at 52 °C. The half‐life for the air–water and the CO₂–water system was 110 and 40 s, respectively, at 5.0 g L^–1 of surfactant at the air flow rate of 1 LPM and 28 °C. In wet foam, the liquid holdup range for the air–water system was 0.38–0.52% and for the CO₂–water system 0.51–0.72% in the concentration range 1.0–5.0 g L^–1 at 1 LPM gas flow rate.     

Synergistic Effects between Anionic and Sulfobetaine Surfactants for Stabilization of Foams Tolerant to Crude Oil in Foam Flooding

In foam flooding, foams stabilized by conventional surfactants are usually unstable in contacting with crude oil, which behaves as a strong defoaming agent. In this article, synergistic effects between different surfactants were utilized to improve foam stability against crude oil. Targeted to reservoir conditions of Daqing crude oil field, China (45 °C, salinity of 6778 mg L⁻¹, pH = 8–9), foams stabilized by typical anionic surfactants fatty alcohol polyoxyethylene ether sulfate (AES) and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) show low composite foam index (200–500 L s) and low oil tolerance index (0.1–0.2). However, the foam stability can be significantly improved by mixing the anionic surfactant with a sulfobetaine surfactant, which behaves as a foam stabilizer increasing the half-life of foams, and those with longer alkyl chain behave better. As an example, by mixing AES and SDS with hexadecyl dimethyl hydroxypropyl sulfobetaine (C₁₆HSB) at a molar fraction of 0.2 (referring to total surfactant, not including water), the maximum composite foaming index and oil tolerance index can be increased to 3000/5000 L s and 1.0/4.0, respectively, at a total concentration between 3 and 5 mM. The attractive interaction between the different surfactants in a mixed monolayer as reflected by the negative β^s parameter is responsible for the enhancement of the foam stabilization, which resulted in lower interfacial tensions and therefore negative enter (E), spreading (S), and bridging (B) coefficients of the oil. The oil is then emulsified as tiny droplets dispersed in lamellae, giving very stable pseudoemulsion films inhibiting rupture of the bubble films. This made it possible to utilize typical conventional anionic surfactants as foaming agents in foam flooding.     

Preparation of open‐cell foams from polymer blends by supercritical CO2 and their efficient oil‐absorbing performance

This letter reports on the hydrophobicity and oleophilicity of open‐cell foams from polymer blends prepared by supercritical CO₂. A typical bulk density of the foam is measured to be 0.05 g/cm³. The contact angle of the foam with water is determined to be 139.2°. The foam can selectively absorb the diesel from water with the uptake capacity of 17.0 g/g. The foams are technologically promising for application of oil spill cleanup. © 2016 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 62: 4182–4185, 2016     

Effect of formation of calcium carbonate on foam stability in Neodol 25-3S anionic surfactant systems

The effect of oils and hardness on stability of foams made from solutions containing 0.01 wt% of three EO alcohol ethoxysulfate sodium salt of commercial anionic surfactant Neodol 25-3S was investigated. When dissolved calcium was present under alkaline conditions using Na₂CO₃ instead of NaOH as a pH regulator, solid CaCO₃ precipitated. It was found in the absence of oil that CaCO₃ particles did not destabilize foam, in contrast to those of the more hydrophobic calcium oleate. The rate of collapse of a foam column was also measured for foams generated from alkaline solutions of an anionic surfactant Neodol 25-3S containing dispersed drops of n-hexadecane, triolein, or mixtures of these oils with small amounts of oleic acid. Oils were added in increments up to oil to surfactant ratio of 1 on a weight basis and the hardness and pH of the aqueous solutions were fixed at 300 ppm and 9 respectively. It was found that triolein has almost no defoaming effect, but the defoaming effect of hexadecane was evident. The same trend was found with mixtures of n-hexadecane/triolein with addition of small amounts of oleic acid. The results of foam stability measurement in the presence of oil could be understood in terms of entry, spreading and bridging coefficients, i.e., ESB analysis. Moreover, as the initial concentration of carbonate ions increased, foam stability was greatly improved for both hexadecane/oleic acid and triolein/oleic acid oils. Evidently, CaCO₃ precipitated preferentially, reducing the number of calcium ions available to form calcium oleate.     

Protocol for Studying Aqueous Foams Stabilized by Surfactant Mixtures

Even though foams have been the subject of intensive investigations over the last decades, many important questions related to their properties remain open. This concerns in particular foams which are stabilized by mixtures of surfactants. The present study deals with the fundamental question: which are the important parameters one needs to consider if one wants to characterize foams properly? We give an answer to this question by providing a measuring protocol which we apply to well‐known surfactant systems. The surfactants of choice are the two non‐ionic surfactants n‐dodecyl‐β‐d ‐maltoside (β‐C₁₂G₂) and hexaethyleneglycol monododecyl ether (C₁₂E₆) as well as their 1:1 mixture. Following the suggested protocol, we generated data which allow discussion of the influence of the surfactant structure and of the composition on the time evolution of the foam volume, the liquid fraction, the bubble size and the bubble size distribution. This paper shows that different foam properties can be assigned to different surfactant structures, which is the crucial point if one wants to tailor‐make surfactants for specific applications.     

Stable CO2/water foam stabilized by dilute surface-modified nanoparticles and cationic surfactant at high temperature and salinity

CO₂ enhanced oil recovery and storage could see widespread deployment as decarbonization efforts accelerate to meet climate goals. CO₂ is more efficiently distributed underground as a viscous foam than as pure CO₂; however, most reported CO₂ foams are unstable at harsh reservoir conditions (22 wt% brine, 2200 psi, and 80°C). We hypothesize that silica nanoparticles (NP) grafted with (3-trimethoxysilylpropyl)diethylenetriamine ligands (N3), to improve colloidal stability, and dimethoxydimethylsilane ligands (DM), to improve CO₂-phillicity, combined with the cationic surfactant N¹-alkyl-N³, N³-dimethylpropane-1,3-diamine (RCADA), will develop viscous, stable CO₂ foams at reservoir conditions. We grafted NP with N3 and DM ligands. We verified NP stability at reservoir conditions with measurements of zeta potential, amine titration curves, and NP diameter. We measured NP water contact angles (θ_w) at the water–air and water–liquid CO₂ interfaces. In a high-temperature, high-pressure flow apparatus, we calculated the viscosity of CO₂ foams across a beadpack and determined static foam stability with microscope observations. Modified NP were colloidally stable at reservoir conditions for 4 weeks, and had higher θ_w in liquid CO₂ than in air. Addition of at least 0.5 μmol/m² DM silane (0.5DM) greatly improved foam stability. RCADA-only foam coarsening rates (dD_SM³/dt) decreased 16–17× after adding 1 wt/vol% 8N3 + 1.5DM NP, and 5–10× with a 0.1–1 vol/vol% increase in RCADA concentration (with or without NP). 1 vol/vol% RCADA foam exhibited coarsening rates of 900 and 2400 μm³/min with 1 and 0.2 wt/vol% 8N3 + 1.5DM NP, respectively. These results demonstrate impressive foam stabilities at harsh reservoir conditions.     

Bulk and bubble-scale experimental studies of influence of nanoparticles on foam stability

Influence of silicon oxide(SiO_2) and aluminum oxide(Al_2O_3) nanoparticles on the stability of nanoparticles and sodium dodecyl sulfate(SDS) mixed solution foams was studied at bulk and bubble-scale. Foam apparent viscosity was also determined in Hele-Shaw cell In order to investigate the foam performance at static and dynamic conditions. Results show that the maximum adsorption of surfactant on the nanoparticles occurs at 3 wt% surfactant concentration. Foam stability increases while the foamability decreases with the increasing nanoparticle concentration. However, optimum nanoparticle concentration corresponding to maximum foam stability was obtained at 1.0 wt% nanoparticle concentration for the hydrophilic SiO_2/SDS and Al_2O_3/SDS foams. Foam performance was enhanced with increasing nanoparticles hydrophobicity. Air-foams were generally more stable than CO_2 foams.Foam apparent viscosity increased in the presence of nanoparticles from 20.34 mPa·s to 84.84 mPa·s while the film thickness increased from 27.5 μm to 136 μm. This study suggests that the static and dynamic stability of conventional foams could be improved with addition of appropriate concentration of nanoparticles into the surfactant solution. The nanoparticles improve foam stability by their adsorption and aggregation at the foam lamellae to increase film thickness and dilational viscoelasticity. This prevents liquid drainage and film thinning and improves foam stability both at the bulk and bubble scale.     

Effect of oil viscosity on recovery processes in relation to foam flooding

Laboratory experiments were conducted to determine the effect of oil viscosity on the oil-recovery efficiency in porous media. The pure surfactants (i.e., sodium dodecyl sulfate and various alkyl alcohols) were selected to correlate the molecular and surface properties of foaming solutions with viscosity, and the recovery of oil. Oil-displacement efficiency was measured by water, surfactant-solution and foam-flooding processes, which included 2 types of foams (i.e., air foam and steam foam). A significant increase in heavy-oil recovery was observed by steam foam flooding compared with that by air foam flooding, whereas for light oils, the steam foam and air foam produced about the same oil recovery. An attempt was made to correlate the chain-length compatibility with the surface properties of the foaming agents and oil-recovery efficiency in porous media. For mixed foaming systems (C₁₂ SO₄ Na + C_n H_2n+1 OH), a minimum in surface tension, a maximum in surface viscosity, a minimum in bubble size and a maximum in oil recovery were observed when both components of the foaming system had the same chain length. These results were explained on the basis of thermal motions (i.e., vibrational, rotational and oscillational) and the molecular packing of surfactants at the gas-liquid interface. The effects of chain-length compatibility and the surface properties of mixed surfactants are relevant to the design of surfactant formulations for oil recovery under given reservoir conditions.     

Viscoelastic Surfactants with High Salt Tolerance,Fast‐Dissolving Property,and Ultralow Interfacial Tension for Chemical Flooding in Offshore Oilfields

Injected chemical flooding systems with high salinity tolerance and fast‐dissolving performance are specially required for enhancing oil recovery in offshore oilfields. In this work, a new type of viscoelastic‐surfactant (VES) solution, which meets these criteria, was prepared by simply mixing the zwitterionic surfactant N‐hexadecyl‐N,N‐dimethyl‐3‐ammonio‐1‐propane sulfonate (HDPS) or N‐octyldecyl‐N,N‐dimethyl‐3‐ammonio‐1‐propane sulfonate (ODPS) with anionic surfactants such as sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). Various properties of the surfactant system, including viscoelasticity, dissolution properties, reduction of oil/water interfacial tension (IFT), and oil‐displacement efficiency of the mixed surfactant system, have been studied systematically. A rheology study proves that at high salinity, 0.73 wt.% HDPS/SDS‐ and 0.39 wt.% ODPS/SDS‐mixed surfactant systems formed worm‐like micelles with viscosity reaching 42.3 and 23.8 mPa s at a shear rate of 6 s^?1, respectively. Additionally, the HDPS/SDS and ODPS/SDS surfactant mixtures also exhibit a fast‐dissolving property (dissolution time <25 min) in brine. More importantly, those surfactant mixtures can significantly reduce the IFT of oil–water interfaces. As an example, the minimum of dynamic‐IFT (IFT_min) could reach 1.17 × 10^?2 mN m^?1 between the Bohai Oilfield crude oil and 0.39 wt.% ODPS/SDS solution. Another interesting finding is that polyelectrolytes such as sodium of polyepoxysuccinic acid can be used as a regulator for adjusting IFT_min to an ultralow level (<10^?2 mN m^?1). Taking advantage of the mobility control and reducing the oil/water IFT of those surfactant mixtures, the VES flooding demonstrates excellent oil‐displacement efficiency, which is close to that of polymer/surfactant flooding or polymer/surfactant/alkali flooding. Our work provides a new type of VES flooding system with excellent performances for chemical flooding in offshore oilfields.     

Recovery and Recycling of CO2/N2‐Switchable Anionic Surfactants in Emulsions

To develop a mild, effective, and clean strategy for recovery and recycling of anionic surfactants in CO₂/N₂‐switchable emulsions, a CO₂/N₂‐switchable anionic surfactant, which is a combination of dodecyl seleninic acid (DSA) and N,N,N′,N′‐tetramethyl‐1,2‐ethylenediamine (TMEDA), here referred to as DSA–TMEDA, was used to stabilize an oil‐in‐water (O/W) emulsion. Upon stimulation with CO₂, DSA–TMEDA was switched off to form insoluble DSA and the water‐soluble TMEDA bicarbonate. Upon N₂ bubbling and heating, the OFF state of DSA–TMEDA was restored to the surfactant of DSA–TMEDA. In this manner, O/W emulsions stabilized by DSA–TMEDA can be switched reversibly between demulsification (phase separation) and re‐emulsification (recovered emulsion) by triggering with CO₂/N₂ over ten times. After breakage of the emulsion, nearly all of the OFF state surfactant could be separated conveniently away from the oil phase, thus facilitating recovery and recycling of the surfactant afterward in emulsifying oil. No obvious adverse changes in the dispersed oil particles size and the relative stability of the regenerated emulsions were observed over five cycles, and the surfactant loss can be neglected during the recycling.     

A new microcellular foam injection‐molding technology using non‐supercritical fluid physical blowing agents

A new foam injection‐molding technology was developed to produce microcellular foams without using supercritical fluid (SCF) pump units. In this technology, physical blowing agents (PBA), such as nitrogen (N₂) and carbon dioxide (CO₂), do not need to be brought to their SCF state. PBAs are delivered directly from their gas cylinders into the molten polymer through an injector valve, which can be controlled by a specially designed screw configuration and operation sequence. The excess PBA is discharged from the molten polymer through a venting vessel. Alternatively, additional PBA is introduced through the venting vessel when the polymer is not saturated with PBA. The amount of gas delivered into the molten polymer is controlled by the gas dosing time of the injector valve, the secondary reducing pressure of the gas cylinder and the outlet (back) pressure of the venting vessel. Microcellular polypropylene foams were prepared using the developed foam injection‐molding technology with 2–6 MPa CO₂ or 2–8 MPa N₂. High expansion foams with an average cell size of less than 25 μm were prepared. The developed technology dispels arguments for the necessity to pressurize N₂ or CO₂ to the SCF to prepare microcellular foams. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 57:105–113, 2017. © 2016 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Foaming and defoaming properties of CO2-switchable surfactants

The present study is about the foaming and defoaming properties of the CO₂-switchable surfactant N,N-dimethyltetradecylamine (C₁₄DMA) and its advantages compared with the non-switchable counterpart tetradecyltrimethylammonium bromide (C₁₄TAB). In the absence of CO₂, C₁₄DMA is a water insoluble organic molecule without any surface activity thus being unable to stabilize foams. In the presence of CO₂, the head group becomes protonated which transforms the water insoluble molecule into a cationic surfactant. Comparing the surface properties and foamability of C₁₄DMA and C₁₄TAB one finds a very similar behavior. However, the foam stabilities differ depending on the gas. Foaming the two-surfactant solutions with CO₂ leads to very unstable foams in both cases. However, foaming the two surfactant solutions with N₂ reveals the switchability of C₁₄DMA: while the volume of foams stabilized with C₁₄TAB hardly changes over 1600 s, the volume of foams stabilized with C₁₄DMA decreases significantly in the same period of time. This difference is due to the fact that the surface activity, that is, the amphiphilic nature, of C₁₄DMA is continuously switching off since CO₂ is displaced by N₂ thus deprotonating and deactivating the surfactant.     

Effects of compositional variations on CO2 foam under miscible conditions

Foam can mitigate the associated problems with the gas injection by reducing the mobility of the injected gas. The presence of an immiscible oleic phase can adversely affect the foam stability. Nevertheless, under miscible conditions gas and oil mix in different proportions forming a phase with a varying composition at the proximity of the displacement front. Therefore, it is important to understand how the compositional variations of the front affect the foam behavior. In this study through several core‐flood experiments under miscible condition, three different regimes were identified based on the effects of the mixed‐phase composition on CO₂ foam‐flow behavior: In Regime 1 the apparent viscosity of the in‐situ fluid was the highest and increased with increasing x_CO2. In Regime 2 the apparent viscosity increased with decreasing x_CO2. In Regime 3 the apparent viscosity of the fluid remained relatively low and insensitive to the value of x_CO2. © 2017 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 64: 758–764, 2018     

Thermosetting foam with a high bio‐based content from acrylated epoxidized soybean oil and carbon dioxide

A resilient, thermosetting foam system with a bio‐based content of 96 wt % (resulting in 81% of C₁₄) was successfully developed. We implemented a pressurized carbon dioxide foaming process that produces polymeric foams from acrylated epoxidized soybean oil (AESO). A study of the cell dynamics of uncured CO₂/ AESO foams proved useful to optimize cure conditions. During collapse, the foam's bulk density increased linearly with time, and the cell size and cell density exhibited power‐law degradation rates. Also, low temperature foaming and cure (i.e. high viscosity) are desirable to minimize foam cell degradation. The AESO was cured with a free‐radical initiator (tert‐butyl peroxy‐2‐ethyl hexanoate, T_i ～ 60°C). Cobalt naphtenate was used as an accelerator to promote quick foam cure at lower temperature (40–50°C). The foam's density was controlled by the carbon dioxide pressure inside the reactor and by the vacuum applied during cure. The viscosity increased linearly during polymerization. The viscosity was proportional to the extent of reaction before gelation, and the cured foam's structure showed a dependence on the time of vacuum application. The average cell size increased and the cell density decreased with foam expansion at a low extent of cure; however, the foam expansion became limited and unhomogeneous with advanced reaction. When vacuum was applied at an intermediate viscosity, samples with densities ～ 0.25 g/cm³ were obtained with small (<1 mm) homogeneous cells. The mechanical properties were promising, with a compressive strength of ～ 1 MPa and a compressive modulus of ～ 20 MPa. The new foams are biocompatible. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 2007     

Generation of low‐density high‐performance poly(arylene ether sulfone) foams using a benign processing technique

In this study, a benign process was used to successfully produce low density foam from poly(arylene ether sulfone) (PAES). Both carbon dioxide (CO₂) and water as well as nitrogen and water were used as physical blowing agents in a one‐step batch process. A large amount of blowing agents (up to 7.5%) was able to diffuse into the PAES resin in a 2‐h saturation time. Utilizing water and CO₂ as the blowing agents yielded foam with better properties than nitrogen and water because both the water and CO₂ are plasticizers for the PAES resin. PAES foam produced from CO₂ and water had a large reduction in foam density (～80%) and a cell size of ～50 μm, while maintaining a primarily closed cell structure. The small cell size and closed cell structure enhanced the mechanical properties of the foam when compared with the PAES foam produced from nitrogen and water. The tensile, compressive, and notched izod impact properties of the PAES foams were examined, and the compressive properties were compared to commercially available structural foams. With reduced compression strength of 39 MPa and reduced compression modulus of 913 MPa, the PAES foam is comparable to polyetherimide and poly(vinylchloride) structural foams. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2009. © 2008 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Aqueous Foam Stabilized by Hydrophobic SiO2 Nanoparticles using Mixed Anionic Surfactant Systems under High-Salinity Brine Condition

A primary concern of surfactant-assisted foams in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) is the stability of the foams. In recent studies, foam stability has been successfully improved by the use of nanoparticles (NP). The adhesion energy of the NP is larger than the adsorbed surfactant molecules at the air–water interface, leading to a steric barrier to mitigate foam-film ruptures and liquid-foam coalescence. In this study, the partially hydrophobic SiO₂ nanoparticles (SiO₂-NP) were introduced to anionic mixed-surfactant systems to investigate their potential for improving the foamability and stability. An appropriate ratio of internal olefin sulfonate (C_15-18 IOS) and sodium polyethylene glycol monohexadecyl ether sulfate (C₃₂H₆₆Na₂O₅S) was selected to avoid the formation of undesirable effects such as precipitation and phase separation under high-salt conditions. The effects of the NP-stabilized foams were investigated through a static foam column experiment. The surface tension, zeta potential, bubble size, and bubble size distribution were observed. The stability of the static foam in a column test was evaluated by co-injecting the NP-surfactant mixture with air gas. The results indicate that the foam stability depends on the dispersion of NP in the bulk phase and at the water–air interface. A correlation was observed in the NP-stabilized foam that stability increased with increasing negative zeta potential values (−54.2 mv). This result also corresponds to the smallest bubble size (214 μm in diameter) and uniform size distribution pattern. The findings from this study provide insights into the viability of creating NP-surfactant interactions in surfactant-stabilized foams for oil field applications.     

Solid‐state microcellular polycarbonate foams. I. The steady‐state process space using subcritical carbon dioxide

The process parameters for production of solid‐state microcellular polycarbonate using subcritical CO₂ were explored. Sufficiently long foaming times were used to produce foams, where cell growth had completed, resulting in steady‐state structures. A wide range of foaming temperatures and saturation pressures below the critical pressure of CO₂ were investigated, establishing the steady state process space for this polymer–gas system. Processing conditions are presented that produce polycarbonate foams where both the foam density and the average cell size can be controlled. The process space showed that we could produce foams at a constant density, while varying the cell size by and order of magnitude. At a relative density of 0.5, the average cell size could be varied from 4 to 40 μm. The ability to produce such a family of foams opens the possibility to explore the effect of microstructure, like cell size on the properties of cellular materials. It was found that the minimum foaming temperature for a given concentration of CO₂, determined from the process space, agrees well with the predicted glass transition temperature of the gas–polymer solution. A characterization of the average cell size, cell size distribution, and cell nucleation density for this system is also reported. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2010. © 2010 Society of Plastics Engineers