Recent Exposure to a Dangerous Context Impairs Extinction and Reinstates Lost Fear Reactions.

Rats were shocked in a context and then exposed to that context in the absence of shock. Shorter intervals between these extinction trials produced more long-term freezing than did longer ones, and shorter intervals between the final extinction trial and test produced more freezing than did longer ones. A short interval between a context extinction trial and test with an extinguished conditioned stimulus (CS) produced more freezing than did a longer one, and a short interval between a nonreinforced context exposure and an extinguished CS reinstated freezing when the CS was tested 24 hr later. The results suggest that recent fear acts to favor subsequent retrieval of the memory formed at conditioning rather than extinction and to render the retrieved memory more salient. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Spontaneous recovery but not reinstatement of the extinguished conditioned eyeblink response in the rat.

Reinstatement—the return of an extinguished conditioned response (CR) after reexposure to the unconditioned stimulus (US)—and spontaneous recovery—the return of an extinguished CR with the passage of time—are 2 of 4 well-established phenomena that demonstrate that extinction does not erase the conditioned stimulus (CS)–US association. However, reinstatement of extinguished eyeblink CRs has never been demonstrated, and spontaneous recovery of extinguished eyeblink CRs has not been systematically demonstrated in rodent eyeblink conditioning. In Experiment 1, US reexposure was administered 24 hr prior to a reinstatement test. In Experiment 2, US reexposure was administered 5 min prior to a reinstatement test. In Experiment 3, a long, discrete cue (a houselight), present in all phases of training and testing, served as a context within which each trial occurred to maximize context processing, which in other preparations has been shown to be required for reinstatement. In Experiment 4, an additional group was included that received footshock exposure, rather than US reexposure, between extinction and test, and contextual freezing was measured prior to test. Spontaneous recovery was robust in Experiments 3 and 4. In Experiment 4, context freezing was strong in a group given footshock exposure but not in a group given eye shock US reexposure. There was no reinstatement observed in any experiment. With stimulus conditions that produce eyeblink conditioning and research designs that produce reinstatement in other forms of classical conditioning, we observed spontaneous recovery but not reinstatement of extinguished eyeblink CRs. This suggests that reinstatement, but not spontaneous recovery, is a preparation- or substrate-dependent phenomenon. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)     

Contextual control of the extinction of conditioned fear: Tests for the associative value of the context.

When male Wistar rats received pairings of a CS with shock in one context and then extinction of the CS in another, fear of the CS was renewed when the CS was returned to and tested in the original context (Exps I and III; 40 Ss). No such renewal was obtained when the CS was tested in a 2nd context after extinction had occurred in the conditioning context (Exp IV; 24 Ss). In Exp II, shocks presented following extinction reinstated fear of the CS, but only if they were presented in the context in which the CS was tested. In each experiment, the associative properties of the contexts were independently assessed. Contextual excitation was assessed primarily with context-preference tests in which Ss chose to sit in either the target context or an adjoining side compartment. Contextual inhibition was assessed with summation tests. Although reinstatement was correlated with demonstrable contextual excitation present during testing, the renewal effect was not. There was no evidence that contextual inhibition developed during extinction. Results suggest that fear of an extinguished CS can be affected by the excitatory strength of the context but that independently demonstrable contextual excitation or inhibition is not necessary for contexts to control that fear. (41 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Differential control by context in the inflation and reinstatement paradigms.

Examined, in 5 conditioned suppression experiments, the influence of summation between fear of the CS and the context in experimental paradigms in which the rat is exposed to UCSs following conditioning or extinction. Context-preference tests assessed contextual fear. In Exps I–III with 88 female Wistar rats, the inflation paradigm, in which fear of a CS paired with a weak UCS is enhanced by exposure to intense UCS alone, was investigated. Results show that the contextual fear that was present when the target CS was tested was reduced by presenting the intense UCSs in a different context, by exposing Ss to the context following their presentation, and by signaling the intense UCSs with a 2nd CS. In Exp IV with 32 female Wistar rats, UCS exposures following conditioning or extinction both produced contextual fear, but only fear of the extinguished CS was reinstated by that fear. In Exp V with 32 female Wistar rats, identical amounts of contextual fear reinstated fear of an extinguished CS, but not a nonextinguished CS, when the 2 types of CSs were arranged to evoke comparable amounts of fear prior to testing. It is suggested that contextual fear plays a role in the reinstatement paradigm but not in the inflation paradigm. (33 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Central CRF receptor antagonist α-helical CRF9-41 blocks reinstatement of extinguished fear: The role of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis.

The present experiments assessed the necessity of central CRF in reinstatement of extinguished fear. Using the fear-potentiated startle procedure, rats were given light-shock pairings (fear conditioning) followed by light-alone extinction training. Rats were then given unsignaled shocks to reinstate fear to the light conditioned stimulus (CS). Intracerebroventricular administration of the CRF antagonist α-Helical CRF9-41 prior to reinstatement training dose-dependently prevented reinstatement. Further, α-Helical CRF9-41 administration prior to reinstatement training or the test for reinstatement of fear to the extinguished CS prevented reinstatement at both treatment times, suggesting that CRF activity is critical for this type of return of fear to an extinguished CS. The abolition of reinstatement by drug administration was not due to state-dependent learning, as rats treated with the drug prior to both reinstatement training or testing also failed α-Helical CRF9-41 in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis suggested that this area is a site at which central CRF is involved in this form of relapse. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

D-Cycloserine and the Facilitation of Extinction of Conditioned Fear: Consequences for Reinstatement.

Several recent studies have reported that D-cycloserine (DCS), a partial N-methyl-D-aspartate agonist, facilitates extinction of learned fear in rats. Other studies have shown that representation of the unconditioned stimulus (US) can reinstate learned fear after extinction. This study examined whether this reinstatement effect occurs in Sprague-Dawley rats given DCS at the time of extinction. Results showed that saline-treated rats exhibited the reinstatement effect but DCS-treated rats did not (Experiments 1 and 2). This lack of reinstatement in DCS-treated rats was not due to residual effects of DCS on either US or context processing (Experiment 3). Overall, these results (a) raise questions about the mechanisms underlying DCS facilitation of extinction and (b) suggest that DCS might have substantial practical benefit. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

The role of the rat hippocampal system in several effects of context in extinction.

The effect of fornix lesions on some effects of manipulating the context on performance in extinction were studied. In renewal, subjects' responding to an extinguished CS recovered when the CS was presented in the context in which it had been conditioned after extinction in a different context. In reinstatement, it recovered when the CS was tested after independent presentation of the unconditioned stimulus (UCS; an effect mediated by contextual conditioning.) In spontaneous recovery, it recovered after the passage of time, that is, when the CS was tested in a new temporal context. In the conditioned suppression method, fornix lesions had no effect on conditioning, extinction, renewal, or spontaneous recovery; however, they abolished the reinstatement effect. The results suggest that the hippocampal system may be important in the formation of context–UCS associations, but not in other types of learning about the context. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Reinstatement of extinguished fear by β-adrenergic arousal elicited by a conditioned context.

Five experiments examined the reinstatement of fear (freezing) produced by recent reexposure to a dangerous context. Rats were trained to fear a conditioned stimulus (CS) and a distinctive context with shock. The CS was then extinguished. A 2-min interval between reexposure to the dangerous context and presentation of the extinguished CS in a different context reinstated freezing when the CS was tested the next day. Propranolol (a β-adrenergic antagonist) blocked reinstatement of extinguished fear without decreasing freezing to a nonextinguished CS. Administration of epinephrine (an adrenergic agonist) reinstated extinguished fear without reexposure to the dangerous context. The results suggest a role for β-adrenergic activity elicited by exposure to a conditioned context in the reinstatement of extinguished fear. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

The effects of neurotoxic hippocampal lesions on two effects of context after fear extinction.

Three conditioned suppression experiments with rats examined the role of the hippocampus in 2 effects of context after extinction. Reinstatement is the context-specific recovery of fear to an extinguished conditioned stimulus (CS) that occurs following independent presentations of the unconditioned stimulus (UCS), after extinction. Renewal is the recovery of fear when the CS is presented in the context in which it was conditioned, after extinction in a different context. Results indicated that neurotoxic lesions of the hippocampus, performed before conditioning, abolished reinstatement, which depends on context–UCS associations, but not renewal, which does not. This dissociation is not the result of differences in the recentness of context learning that ordinarily governs the 2 effects. The results suggest that the hippocampus is necessary for some, but not all, types of contextual learning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Facilitation of extinction by an increase or a decrease in trial duration.

Five experiments examined the effects of altering the duration of a conditioned stimulus (CS) for extinction. For the first 3 experiments, rats received conditioning with a 10-s CS before different groups received extinction with a CS that was either the same duration or longer than that used for conditioning. For the remaining 2 experiments, conditioning was conducted with a 60-s CS before different groups received extinction with a CS of either the same duration or a shorter duration than that used for conditioning. In all experiments, extinction progressed more readily when the CS duration was different for the 2 stages than when it was constant. The results are discussed in terms of rate expectancy theory and associative learning theory. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Slow reacquisition following extinction: Context, encoding, and retrieval mechanisms.

Investigated the slow reacquisition (RAQ) of responding in rats that occurs when the conditioned stimulus/stimuli (CS) and unconditioned stimulus/stimuli (UCS) are paired again after prolonged extinction training. In Exp 1, an extinguished CS acquired less suppression than a novel CS during a final conditioning phase, but more suppression than CSs that had received comparable nonreinforcement without initial conditioning. In Exp 2, CS–UCS pairings resumed in the context of extinction caused the least RAQ of suppression: Pairings in a neutral context produced better RAQ, while return of the CS to the conditioning context caused an immediate renewal of responding to the CS. In Exp 3, a return of the CS to the extinction context after RAQ training caused renewed extinction performance and interfered with performance appropriate to RAQ. This effect was not due to demonstrable inhibitory conditioning of the extinction context. Results suggest that representations of conditioning and extinction (or CS–UCS and CS–no UCS relations) are both retained through extinction and that performance appropriate to either phase can be cued by the corresponding context. RAQ may thus be slow when the context retrieves an extinction memory. Similar mechanisms may also play a role in other Pavlovian interference paradigms. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

A Partial Reinforcement Extinction Effect Despite Equal Rates of Reinforcement During Pavlovian Conditioning.

In 4 experiments rats received appetitive Pavlovian conditioning followed by extinction. Food accompanied every trial with the conditioned stimulus (CS) for the continuously reinforced groups and only half of the trials for the partially reinforced groups. In contrast to previous experiments that have compared the effects of partial and continuous reinforcement, the rate at which food was delivered during the CS was the same for both groups. The strength of the conditioned response during extinction weakened more rapidly in the continuously than in the partially reinforced groups. The results demonstrate that the partial reinforcement extinction effect is a consequence of the nonreinforced trials with the CS, rather than the rate at which the unconditioned stimulus is delivered during the CS. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

The effects of acquisition training schedule on extinction and reinstatement of cocaine self-administration in male rats.

Partial reinforcement is known to increase resistance to extinction (Rn) relative to training with continuous reinforcement. This phenomenon, referred to as the partial reinforcement extinction effect, is one of the most robust in learning and conditioning studies. Experiment 1 investigated manipulations known to affect the partial reinforcement extinction effect and determined their possible relevance for drug use patterns. Male rats received intravenous cocaine self-administration training under partial reinforcement (FR-10) training or continuous reinforcement (FR-1) conditions with either a low (0.25 mg/kg infusion) or a high cocaine dose (1.00 mg/kg infusion). Animals were placed on an extinction (recurrent nonreward) schedule for 10 days (1-hr sessions) prior to being tested for cue-induced reinstatement (single 2-hr session). Experiment 2 involved acquisition of cocaine self-administration under FR-1 conditions of short training (15 days) or extended training (30 days) with a low dose (0.25 mg/kg infusion) or a medium dose (0.50 mg/kg infusion) of cocaine reward prior to extinction or reinstatement. Experiment 1 showed that rats trained with FR-10-high dose outcomes exhibited greater Rn than the remaining groups. Additionally, FR-10-high dose and FR-10-low dose rats were more likely to return to active drug seeking during the reinstatement test. In Experiment 2, rats trained under FR-1-medium dose conditions were more persistent during extinction following short acquisition training than comparable rats experiencing extended acquisition training. The reinstatement test was conducted following extinction, in which it was observed that overtraining under FR-1-medium dose reward schedules resulted in a decrease in the tendency to return to active drug seeking. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Context change as the mechanism of reinstatement in causal learning.

Four experiments were conducted to explore the mechanism of reinstatement in human causal learning. After a retroactive interference treatment in which a stimulus was first followed by an outcome (A+) and then followed by a different outcome (A*), simple exposure to the original outcome (+) in the interference-test context produced partial reinstatement of the first-learned information (A+). When exposure to the outcome took place in a context different from the interference-test context, reinstatement was not observed (Experiment 1). Equivalent results appeared when the outcome presented during reinstatement was different from the one originally related to the stimulus affected by interference, independent of whether the interfering outcome (Experiments 2, 3, and 4) or a new outcome (Experiments 3 and 4) was presented before the test. These results suggest an interpretation of reinstatement in terms of a context change between interference and testing. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Normal conditioning inhibition and extinction of freezing and fear-potentiated startle following electrolytic lesions of medial prefrontal cortex in rats.

The authors investigated the role of medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) in the inhibition of conditioned fear in rats using both Pavlovian extinction and conditioned inhibition paradigms. In Experiment 1, lesions of ventral mPFC did not interfere with conditioned inhibition of the fear-potentiated startle response. In Experiment 2, lesions made after acquisition of fear conditioning did not retard extinction of fear to a visual conditioned stimulus (CS) and did not impair "reinstatement" of fear after unsignaled presentations of the unconditioned stimulus. In Experiment 3, lesions made before fear conditioning did not retard extinction of fear-potentiated startle or freezing to an auditory CS. In both Experiments 2 and 3, extinction of fear to contextual cues was also unaffected by the lesions. These results indicate that ventral mPFC is not essential for the inhibition of fear under a variety of circumstances. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Mechanisms underlying retarded emergence of conditioned responding following inhibitory training: Evidence for the comparator hypothesis.

The comparator hypothesis posits that conditioned responding is determined by a comparison at the time of testing between the associative strengths of the conditioned stimulus/stimuli (CS) and stimuli proximal to the CS at the time of conditioning. The hypothesis treats all associations as being excitatory and treats conditioned inhibition as the behavioral consequence of a CS that is less excitatory than its comparator stimuli. Conditioned lick suppression by rats was used to differentiate 4 possible sources of retarded responding to an inhibitory CS. These include habituation to the unconditioned stimulus/stimuli (UCS), latent inhibition to the CS, blocking of the CS-UCS association by the conditioning context, and enhanced excitatory associations to the comparator stimuli. Prior research has demonstrated the 1st 3 phenomena. Therefore, we employed parameters expected to highlight the 4th one—the comparator process. In Exp I, our negative contingency training produced a conditioned inhibitor that passed inhibitory summation and retardation tests. In Exp II we found transfer of retardation from an inhibitory CS to a novel stimulus when the location where retardation-test training occurred was excitatory. In Exp III, extinction of the conditioning context attenuated retardation regardless of whether extinction occurred before or after the CS-UCS pairings of the retardation test. Exp IV demonstrated that habituation to the UCS did not contribute to retardation in the present case. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Effect of context on performance to conditioned stimuli with mixed histories of reinforcement and nonreinforcement.

Five conditioned suppression experiments, with 160 Wistar rats, explored the role of the conditioning history of the conditioned stimulus (CS) in determining the effects of contextual fear on performance to the CS. Contextual fear was produced by postconditioning exposure to unconditioned stimulus/stimuli (UCS) alone in the context of conditioning; it was independently assessed with context-preference tests. When the number of reinforced and nonreinforced trials was equated across extinction, partial reinforcement, and latent inhibition procedures, only the extinction procedure produced a CS whose performance was subsequently affected (i.e., augmented) by contextual fear. Contextual fear's relatively unique augmenting effect on fear of an extinguished CS was abolished by extensive, but not by less extensive, reacquisition training. Results indicate that, depending on the CS's conditioning history, contextual fear either augments or has little effect on fear of the CS. It is suggested that augmentation by context should be viewed as the restoration of fear that is otherwise depressed by extinction. (28 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Unconditioned stimulus devaluation effects in nutrient-conditioned flavor preferences.

Experiments with different temporal relations between the conditioned stimulus (CS) and the unconditioned stimulus (US) in conditioning assessed whether US devaluation effects can be obtained after nutrient-conditioned flavor preference learning. One flavor (CScarb) was paired with a carbohydrate, Polycose; a 2nd flavor (CSprot) was paired with a protein, casein; and a 3rd flavor (CS-) was presented by itself. Following conditioning, one of the nutrients was devalued through pairings with lithium chloride in the absence of the CS flavors. In a subsequent 2-bottle test, rats preferred CScarb over CSprot; however, this preference was smaller when the carbohydrate was devalued than when the protein was devalued. Results suggest that CS flavors are able to form associations with the sensory features of nutrient USs under a wide variety of circumstances. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Rapid reacquisition in conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response.

Reacquisition after extinction often appears faster than original acquisition. However, data from conditioned suppression studies indicate that this effect may arise from spontaneous recovery and reinstatement of unextinguished contextual stimuli related to the unconditioned stimulus/stimuli (UCS). In the present experiments using the rabbit nictitating membrane preparation, spontaneous recovery was eradicated before reacquisition training. UCS contextual stimuli were controlled by retaining the UCS during extinction through explicit unpairings of the conditioned stimulus/stimuli (CS) and UCS. Attempts were also made to drive the associative strength of the CS into the inhibitory region by differential conditioning and conditioned inhibition procedures. In all cases, reacquisition was very rapid in comparison with a rest control. The results are discussed with respect to their implications for CS and UCS processing models of conditioning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Opioid Receptors Regulate the Extinction of Pavlovian Fear Conditioning.

Rats received a single pairing of an auditory conditioned stimulus (CS) with a footshock unconditioned stimulus (US). The fear (freezing) that had accrued to the CS was then extinguished. Injection of naloxone prior to this extinction significantly impaired the development of extinction. This impairment was mediated by opioid receptors in the brain and was not observed when naloxone was injected after extinction training. Finally, an injection of naloxone on test failed to reinstate extinguished responding that had already accrued to the CS. These experiments show that opioid receptors regulate the development, but not the expression, of fear extinction and are discussed with reference to the roles of opioid receptors in US processing, memory, and appetitive motivation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)