Revision pedicle screws. Bigger, longer shims--what is best?

STUDY DESIGN: To evaluate the effect of change in screw dimensions and hole augmentation in pedicle screw revisions, the insertional torque was determined, and results were compared with those in control specimens in an in vitro study using cadaveric thoracolumbar spines. OBJECTIVES: To determine the best method of salvage for failed pedicle screws, by evaluating the insertional torque after placing a larger diameter or longer screw into a stripped hole. Use of a shim and use of larger and longer screws were also investigated. Finally, the effect on insertional torque of simply removing and replacing a pedicle screw in its original hole was investigated. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The effects of using bigger or longer screws and shims to salvage failed pedicles have been studied. The interaction between how much larger, how much longer, and inserting with or without shims, has not been well studied. Optimizing reinsertional torque through the use of bigger screws risks exceeding the pedicle capacity. Using longer screws risks violation of the anterior vertebral body, thereby placing the great vessels and viscera at risk. By knowing the relative contribution of increase in length and diameter, the surgeon can optimize the risk-benefit ratio. METHODS: Eight cadaveric spines from T10 to S1 were harvested. The specimens underwent radiographic screening and bone densitometry. A modified Latin square randomization was designed to evaluate the screw diameters and lengths. Each pedicle was its own control. A 35- x 6.5-mm screw was used as a control. Test screws were placed after pedicle screw hole failure was achieved and documented by stripping. For the test screws, the diameters were increased by 1 mm and 2 mm, the lengths were increased by 5 mm and 10 mm. Shims were added randomly. The peak insertional torque was measured for each control screw and test screw placement. In addition, during each screw placement, the screw was removed and replaced to determine the effect. RESULTS: Insertional torque, after the pedicle screw is removed and replaced in the same hole, was decreased by 34% (P < 0.000005). Increasing the diameter of the salvage screw by 2 mm caused the insertional torque to be increased by 8.4% of the original. Increasing the length of the screw did not improve the salvage screw insertional torque. There was an interaction effect for the 1-mm increase in diameter and the increase in length. At this diameter, increasing the length had a significant effect (P = 0.009) on the salvage torque. Using a shim created no improvement in salvage insertional torque (P = 0.77). There was a poor linear correlation between torque and bone mineral density (r = 0.18) in these osteoporotic specimens. CONCLUSIONS: Removing and replacing a pedicle screw in its original hole substantially decreases its mechanical fixation. For pedicle salvage, increasing the diameter causes the greatest restoration of strength. Shims had no effect in pedicle salvage in osteoporotic specimens.     

Use of cervicothoracic junction pedicle screws for reconstruction of complex cervical spine pathology

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of 21 patients in which cervical pedicle screw fixation was used at C7 with or without upper thoracic pedicle screw fixation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of pedicle screw placement in the lower cervical spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The use of posterior cervical spine fixation, including lateral mass fixation, has become increasingly popular in recent years. However, lateral mass fixation at C7 is often hindered by lack of substantial high quality bone. The end level of long cervical spine constructs is frequently C7 or T1. Dissatisfaction with lateral mass fixation at C7 and T1 led the authors to use lower cervical pedicle screw fixation for several cervical spine disorders. METHODS: Twenty-one patients who had undergone cervical pedicle screw fixation at C7 were reviewed retrospectively. There were 12 males and 9 females, with an average age of 52 years. All pedicle screws were placed, after direct palpation of the pedicle, with a right angle nerve hook after laminoforaminotomy at C7. RESULTS: There were no neurologic complications related to pedicle screw placement, and no patient was symptomatically worse after the operation. Six patients with root pathology improved. Of 14 patients with cervical myelopathy, 12 improved at least one Nurick grade, and 2 had no improvement. There were no failures of fixation or complications related to pedicle fixation at a minimum of 1 year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Pedicle screws in C7 placed with laminoforaminotomy and palpation technique appears to be safe and efficacious. Excellent fixation can be achieved.     

Restoration of pedicle screw fixation with an in situ setting calcium phosphate cement

STUDY DESIGN: Pedicle screws were pulled out of human cadaveric vertebrae before and after augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate or in situ-setting calcium phosphate cement. The fixation strength of screws augmented with calcium phosphate cement was compared with that of screws augmented with polymethylmethacrylate. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a new in situ-setting calcium phosphate cement might be suitable for augmenting the fixation of pedicle screws. The principle objective was to compare the pull-out resistance of screws augmented with calcium phosphate cement with the pull-out behavior of screws augmented with polymethylmethacrylate. Polymethylmethacrylate augmentation was chosen as the standard because of its current clinical use. Five types of screws were tested to determine whether screw design had an effect on the efficacy of augmentation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although many factors affect the pull-out resistance of pedicle screws, a key determinant of their performance is the strength of their attachment to the spine. In elderly, osteopenic patients, the screw-bone interface is especially at risk for stripping during insertion or pull-out after surgery. In these patients, polymethylmethacrylate has been used to augment pedicle screw fixation, although its use is not without risk. In situ-setting calcium phosphate cements may provide an alternative to polymethylmethacrylate in this application. Like polymethylmethacrylate, calcium phosphate cements can be injected into the prepared screw hole. They have the added advantage of being resorbed and replaced during healing and normal bone remodeling. METHODS: Thirty human lower lumbar vertebrae (L3-L5) were implanted bilaterally with one of five types of pedicle screws (n = 6 for each screw type). The screws were pulled out 3.0 mm at 0.25 mm/sec with a servohydraulic materials testing machine. The 3.0-mm pull-out distance, which was slightly longer than one thread pitch, was designed to strip the screw-bone interface but to leave the pedicle otherwise intact. After the initial testing, the screws in each vertebrae were removed, and the screw tracks were filled with 2.0 cc of polymethylmethacrylate (one side) or calcium phosphate cement (contralateral side). After augmentation, the screws were reinserted, and the cements were allowed to harden for 24 hours. Postaugmentation testing followed the protocols for preaugmentation testing, and the pull-out resistance of screws augmented with calcium phosphate cement was compared with the pull-out resistance of screws augmented with polymethylmethacrylate. RESULTS: Mechanically, calcium phosphate cement compared favorably with polymethylmethacrylate for augmenting pedicle screws. Both restored the strength of the screw-bone interface: across all screw types, the average increase in pull-out strength was 147% with polymethylmethacrylate augmentation and 102% with calcium phosphate cement. There were no significant differences because of screw type with either type of augmentation. CONCLUSIONS: The in situ-setting calcium phosphate cement investigated in this study compared favorably with polymethylmethacrylate in a single-cycle, pull-out test of augmented pedicle screws in senile trabecular bone. With further evaluation, this cement may offer an alternative to polymethylmethacrylate for the enhancement of pedicle screw fixation clinically.     

Accuracy of using computed tomography to identify pedicle screw placement in cadaveric human lumbar spine

STUDY DESIGN: Utility of using computed tomography to predict pedicle screw misplacement. OBJECTIVE: This study defines the sensitivity and specificity of predicting pedicle screw placement by experienced clinicians using a CT scan image. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In clinical and research settings, the method most commonly used to evaluate pedicle screws placement has been computed tomography. However, no current literature describes the accuracy of this method of evaluating screw placement. METHOD: Cobalt-chrome and titanium alloy pedicle screws of identical size were placed in six cadaveric human lumbar spine. Wide laminectomy was performed to allow complete visualization of the pedicles. Three consecutive lumbar levels were instrumented in each spine, giving 36 pedicle screw placements to identify. The instrumented spines were imaged, and four orthopaedic spine surgeons and a musculoskeletal radiologist were asked to read the images to identify the accuracy of screw placement within the pedicles. RESULTS: The sensitivity rate of identifying a misplaced screw was 67 +/- 6% for cobalt-chrome screws compared with 86 +/- 5% for titanium screws (P < 0.005). The specificity rates of radiographic diagnosis of misplaced pedicle screws were 66 +/- 10% for cobalt-chrome screws and 88 +/- 8% for titanium screws (P < 0.005). Similarly, a statistically significant difference was found in the sensitivity rates of identifying screws placed correctly in the pedicle: 70 +/- 10% for cobalt-chrome screws versus 89 +/- 8% for titanium screws (P < 0.005). Overall accuracy rates were 68 +/- 7% for cobalt chrome screws versus 87 +/- 3% for titanium screws (P < 0.002). CONCLUSION: Reliance on the computed tomography scan data alone in determining accuracy of pedicle screws can lead to inaccuracies in both clinical and research conditions.     

Anatomic considerations of anterior transarticular screw fixation for atlantoaxial instability

STUDY DESIGN: Anatomic parameters of C1 and C2 were measured in 30 dried human cervical spines. Anterior transarticular C1-C2 screws were placed in 15 cadaveric spines. OBJECTIVE: To provide anatomic data for anterior transarticular atlantoaxial screw or C1-C2 screw and plate fixation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A posterior approach to fixation in the atlantoaxial joint has been well described. Damage to the vertebral artery is documented as a rare complication of posterior atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation. An anterior surgical approach to exposing the upper cervical spine for internal fixation and bone graft recently has been developed. No anatomic information regarding the anterior transarticular atlantoaxial screw or screw and plate fixation between C1 and C2 is available in the literature. METHODS: Direct measurements using digital calipers and a goniometer were taken from 30 pairs of dried human C1 and C2 vertebrae. The anterior transarticular C1-C2 screw insertion point is at the junction of the lateral edge of the C2 vertebral body to 4 mm above the inferior edge of the C2 anterior arch. The parameters related to anterior transarticular atlantoaxial screw fixation or screw and plate fixation between the C1 lateral mass and the C2 vertebral body were measured. Fifteen embalmed cadavers were used for anterior C1-C2 transarticular screw placement. Longer screws (30-40 mm) were used to detect whether the screw tips violated the upper cervical canal or vertebral arteries. RESULTS: In the anterior transarticular atlantoaxial screw placement, lateral angulation of the screw placement relative to sagittal plane ranged from 4.8 +/- 1.8 degrees to 25.3 +/- 2.6 degrees. The posterior angulation of the screw placement relative to the coronal plane ranged from 12.8 +/- 3.1 degrees to 22.6 +/- 3.2 degrees. The length of the medial screw path ranged from 14.7 +/- 1.5 mm to 25.4 +/- 2.8 mm. In the anterior screw and plate fixation, the anteroposterior diameter of the inferior facet articular surface ranged from 16.2 +/- 1.6 mm to 17.1 +/- 1.8 mm. The anteroposterior diameter of the C2 vertebral body ranged from 9.3 +/- 1 mm to 16.2 +/- 1.8 mm. The anterior prevascular retropharyngeal approach appropriately exposed the atlantoaxial joint for anterior transarticular C1-C2 screw placement. No screws violated the vertebral artery and cervical canal. CONCLUSIONS: An anterior transarticular atlantoaxial screw 15-25 mm long can be inserted with a lateral angulation of 5-25 degrees relative to the sagittal plane and a posterior angulation of 10-25 degrees relative to the coronal plane. Additionally, in C1-C2 anterior plate fixation screws 15 mm long could be anchored in the inferior facet of the C1, and screws 9-15 mm long could be anchored in the C2 vertebral body.     

Computer-aided pedicle screw placement using frameless stereotaxis

STUDY DESIGN: In vitro assessment of accuracy and reliability of frameless stereotaxis for insertion of pedicle screws in human cadaveric lumbar spine. OBJECTIVES: To assess a new method of targeting and placing pedicle screws in a human cadaver study. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pedicle screw instrumentation is common. Complications may occur from improper placement of screws. Even when performed by experienced spinal surgeons, improper placement can occur in 5.2% of pedicles instrumented. Development of computer-guided methods of pedicle screw insertion may decrease this complication rate. METHODS: The technique used preoperative computed tomography scans together with a commercial neurosurgical navigational computer system to assist in placing guidewires in the pedicles. A section of human cadaver spine was first scanned and the data transferred to the workstation. The image data set and physical specimen were then registered by using an instrumented articulated arm to identify selected points on the specimen and randomly sample surface points. Eight highly repeatable locations on each vertebral body were found to be suitable for registration, but better overall accuracy was obtained when surface matching was used in combination with these points. Under guidance of image on the computer, Kirschner wires were inserted into the pedicles of four vertebral bodies. The spine was rescanned, and the planned and resulting positions of the wires compared. RESULTS: The average distance between the planned and resulting wire entry point was 1.2 mm, with an average difference in planned and resulting trajectories of 6.0 degrees. CONCLUSIONS: Computer-aided pedicle screw instrumentation is feasible. Further technical points require clarification before widespread use is possible.     

Carbonated apatite cement augmentation of pedicle screw fixation in the lumbar spine

STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical testing with human cadaveric lumbar vertebral bodies was used to determine the utility of an injectable carbonated apatite cancellous bone cement for improving the structural performance of pedicle screws subjected to axial pull-out or transverse cyclic loading. OBJECTIVES: To ascertain whether augmentation with a carbonated apatite cement can enhance pedicle screw fixation in the lumbar spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The beneficial effects of polymethylmethacrylate augmentation on pedicle screw pull-out strength have been demonstrated. Cancellous bone cement, however, may provide an attractive alternative in this application, as it is remodelable, biocompatible, and nonexothermic. METHODS: Forty-three cadaveric lumbar vertebral bodies were instrumented with pedicle screws. In 20 of these specimens, axial pull-out strength was compared between the control screws and those augmented with cancellous bone cement. In the remaining 23 specimens, the screws were loaded in the superior-inferior direction with a peak displacement of +/- 1 mm at a frequency of 3 Hz for 5000 cycles. Three parameters were calculated from the force-versus-time data: 1) the energy dissipated, 2) the peak force at the start of the test, and 3) the peak force at the end of 5000 cycles. RESULTS: The pull-out strength of the augmented pedicles averaged 68% greater than that of the control side. In response to cyclic loading, all measures of bio-mechanical performance improved 30-63%. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that augmentation with this carbonated apatite cancellous bone cement can enhance immediate screw fixation.     

Pedicle screw placement using image guided techniques

Clinical evaluation of a computer assisted spine surgical system is presented. Eighty pedicle screws were inserted using computer assisted technology in thoracic and lumbar vertebrae for treatment of different types of disorders including fractures, spondylolisthesis, and scoliosis. Fifty-two patients with severe fractures, spondylolisthesis, or pseudoarthrosis of T10 to L5 were treated using a computer assisted technique on 1/2 the patients and performing the screw insertion manually for the other 1/2. At the same time, 28 pedicle screws were inserted in T12 to L4 vertebrae for scoliosis with the help of the computer assisted technique. Surgery was followed in all cases (66 vertebrae; 132 pedicle screws) by postoperative radiographs and computed tomographic examination, on which measurements of screw position relative to pedicle position could be done. For fractures, spondylolisthesis, or pseudarthrosis, comparison between the two groups showed that four screws in 52 (8%) vertebrae had incorrect placement with computer assisted technique whereas 22 screws in 52 (42%) vertebrae had incorrect placement with manual insertion. In patients with scoliosis, four screws in 28 (14%) vertebrae had incorrect placement. In all of the patients (132 pedicle screws) there were no neurologic complications. These results show that a computer assisted technique is much more accurate and safe than manual insertion.     

Impact of chronic cough on quality of life

STUDY DESIGN: The biomechanical influence of in situ setting hydroxyapatite cement was examined for use in pedicle screw revision surgery. Pull-out testing of control and pedicle screws augmented with hydroxyapatite cement was performed in human cadaver vertebrae. OBJECTIVES: To determine the immediate effect of using hydroxyapatite cement to augment revision pedicle screws after failure of the primary pedicle screw fixation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The potential problems associated with using polymethylmethacrylate to augment revision pedicular instrumentation have prompted the search for other solutions. The introduction of resorbable hydroxyapatite pastes may have provided new biocompatible solutions for pedicle screw revision. METHODS: Ten human cadaver vertebrae were instrumented with 6.0-mm pedicle screws in each pedicle. The screws were loaded to failure in axial tension (pull-out). The failed pedicles then were instrumented with 7.0-mm pedicle screws, either augmented with hydroxyapatite cement or nonaugmented, which also were loaded to failure. Finally, the nonaugmented 7.0-mm screw hole was reinstrumented with a hydroxyapatite cement-augmented, 7.0-mm pedicle screw and loaded to failure. RESULTS: The pull-out strength of the 7.0-mm, hydroxyapatite cement-augmented screws was 325% (P = 2.9 x 10(-5)) of that of the 6.0-mm control screws, whereas the strength of the 7.0-mm nonaugmented screws was only 73% (P = 2.0 x 10(-2)) of that of the 6.0-mm control screws. The 7.0-mm screws augmented with hydroxyapatite cement also were able to salvage 7.0-mm pull-out sites to 384% (P = 6.9E-5) of the pull-out strength of the 7.0-mm nonaugmented screws. CONCLUSIONS: Hydroxyapatite cement may be a mechanically viable alternative to polymethyl methacrylate for augmenting revision pedicular instrumentation and should be considered for future experimental, animal, and clinical testing.     

Anterior transpedicular fixation of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine. Experimental verification using a new direction finder

Currently, no anterior spinal implant provides a strong bone-screw interface because of the cancellous characteristics of the vertebral body. A more secure anchorage could be obtained by anterior transpedicular screw fixation. Four hundred transpedicular screws located between T7 and L5 were placed using the newly developed direction finder. Measurements were obtained directly from radiographs of the cadaveric specimens. In 10 cases (2.5%), the screws crossed the medial pedicle border, but never by more than 1.4 mm. A lateral protrusion was noted in another 41 screws (10%), with no protrusion greater than 2.2 mm. Encroachments beyond the superior or inferior border were not observed. The mean angle of the screws at each level measured between 7 and 19 in the transverse plane and between 2 and 4.5 in the sagittal plane. This technique should be reserved for vertebrae without significant arthritic changes. The rare screw with minimal infraction through the medial or lateral pedicle wall should not cause any vascular or neural compromise. The anterior transpedicular screw technique appeared relatively safe (88%) and encouraged the development of the new plate system for anterior spinal stabilization.     

Posterior C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation for atlantoaxial arthrodesis

OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcomes associated with C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation. METHODS: The clinical outcomes of 121 patients treated with posterior C1-C2 transarticular screws and wired posterior C1-C2 autologous bone struts were evaluated prospectively. Atlantoaxial instability was caused by rheumatoid arthritis in 48 patients, C1 or C2 fractures in 45, transverse ligament disruption in 11, os odontoideum in 9, tumors in 6, and infection in 2. RESULTS: Altogether, 226 screws were placed under lateral fluoroscopic guidance. Bilateral C1-C2 screws were placed in 105 patients; each of 16 patients had only one screw placed because of an anomalous vertebral artery (n = 13) or other pathological abnormality. Postoperatively, each patient underwent radiography and computed tomography to assess the position of the screw and healing. Most screws (221 screws, 98%) were positioned satisfactorily. Five screws were malpositioned (2%), but none were associated with clinical sequelae. Four malpositioned screws were reoperated on (one was repositioned, and three were removed). No patients had neurological complications, strokes, or transient ischemic attacks. Long-term follow-up (mean, 22 mo) of 114 patients demonstrated a 98% fusion rate. Two nonunions (2%) required occipitocervical fixation. In comparison, our C1-C2 fixations with wires and autograft (n = 74) had an 86% union rate. CONCLUSION: Rigidly fixating C1-C2 instability with transarticular screws was associated with a significantly higher fusion rate than that achieved using wired grafts alone. The risk of screw malpositioning and catastrophic vascular or neural injury is small and can be minimized by assessing the position of the foramen transversaria on preoperative computed tomographic scans and by using intraoperative fluoroscopy and frameless stereotaxy to guide the screw trajectory.     

The reliability of the lateral radiograph in determination of the optimal transarticular C1-C2 screw length

STUDY DESIGN: This study assessed the value of using lateral radiographs in evaluating the optimal screw length in transarticular C1-C2 screw fixation. OBJECTIVES: To assess the reliability of the lateral radiograph in determining the optimal transarticular C1-C2 screw length. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Transarticular C1-C2 screw placement is usually performed using anatomic landmarks and fluoroscopy. A lateral fluoroscopic image is valuable when directing screws in the sagittal plane, but its exact role in determining screw length has not been investigated. METHODS: Eight cervical spine specimens were used in this study. Screw placements were performed in each specimen, fixed in the exact lateral position and under direct visualization. After each placement, a lateral radiograph was taken. The odontoid process was divided into three equal portions. Another portion anterior to the odontoid process was called the anterior tubercle region. The number of screw tips appearing in each portion on the radiograph was then recorded for each placement. In addition, 30 C1 specimens were measured to evaluate the anterior part of C1. RESULTS: The results showed that 12.5% of the screws placed 2 mm short of reaching the ventral cortex and 0 mm overpenetrating the ventral cortex of the lateral mass of C1 projected in the radiograph on the anterior tubercle region, 37.5% on the anterior region of the odontoid process, and 50% on the middle region of the odontoid process. Twenty-five percent of the screws that were placed to overpenetrate, by 2 or 4 mm, the ventral cortex of the lateral mass of C1 were projected on the anterior tubercle region in the radiograph, and 50% and 62.5% were projected on the anterior region of the odontoid process, respectively. The mean vertical distance between the anteriormost point of the anterior tubercle of the anterior ring and the middle of the ventral cortex of the lateral in all specimens was 5.6 +/- 1 mm, and the mean transverse angle of the anterior ring relative to the frontal plane was 21.1 +/- 3.5 degrees. CONCLUSIONS: This results in this study indicate that a lateral radiograph may not be reliable in determining the optimal screw length, although it is valuable in directing accurate screw angle in the sagittal plane. Preoperative computed tomographic evaluation of the C1-C2 region may be helpful in estimating the location of the screw tip on the lateral radiograph during surgery.     

School contact tracing for tuberculosis using two-step Mantoux testing

Using a 3-dimensional in vitro model, the stability of different types of osteosynthesis for the short sagittal osteotomy was tested. The following four groups of plate and screw configurations were evaluated: Group I: Fixation with miniplates using monocortical screws only, Group II: Fixation with miniplates, but with two of the screws engaging both fragments, Group III: Same as group II with an additional position screw, Group IV: Fixation with 3 position screws. The stability obtained with miniplate fixation using monocortical screws only (group I) was by a factor of 2.9 less than position screw fixation (group IV), which is considered to be an approved standard. In order to increase the stability of miniplate fixation, the screws in the area of overlapping bone should engage both fragments.     

Safety and accuracy of transarticular screw fixation C1-C2 using an aiming device. An anatomic study

STUDY DESIGN: In this anatomic study, the safety and accuracy of C1-C2 transarticular screw placement was tested in a normal anatomic situation in cadaver specimens using a specially designed aiming device. OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and accuracy of transarticular screw placement using the technique described by Magerl and a specially designed aiming device. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Transarticular C1-C2 screw fixation has been shown to be biomechanically superior to posterior C1-C2 wiring techniques. Several clinical series have been reported in the literature. However, no previous study assessing the accuracy or safety of this technique has been published. Structures at risk are the vertebral arteries, spinal canal, and the occiput-C1 joint. METHODS: Five frozen human cadaveric specimens were thawed and instrumented with 10 C1-C2 transarticular screws, according to the technique described by Magerl but using a specially designed aiming device described by the senior author (Jeanneret). After screw placement, the accuracy of screw positioning and the distance of the screws from the spinal canal, vertebral arteries, and atlanto-occipital joint were determined by anatomic dissection and radiographic analysis. RESULTS: The structure at greatest risk was the atlanto-occipital joint, with one screw found to be damaging the joint. Vertebral artery or spinal canal penetration was not observed in any of the specimens. Screw length averaged 45 mm and, with proper length, the screw tip was found to be located approximately 7.5 mm behind the anterior tubercle of C1 on lateral radiographs. CONCLUSIONS: This anatomic study demonstrates that C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation can be performed safely in a normal anatomic situation by surgeons who are familiar with the pertinent anatomy. The aiming device allowed safe instrumentation in all patients. In case of an irregular anatomic situation (e.g., congenital abnormalities or trauma), computed tomographic scan with sagittal reconstruction is recommended-in particular, to obtain information about the course of the vertebral artery.     

Omega-3 fatty acids in the prevention-management of cardiovascular disease

Eight cervical spines were used to evaluate the relation of the screw tip to the nerve root in the intervertebral foramen. The specimens were divided into two groups: (a) lateral placement without contact with the nerve root, and (b) lateral placement with penetration of the nerve root. Six screws were used for each specimen. After screw placement, oblique radiographs and axial computed tomography (CT) scans were taken. The results on oblique radiographs showed that 23 (95.8%) of 24 screws without contact with the nerve root were found in the upper zone or the junction between the upper and lower zones of the intervertebral foramen. Twenty (83.3%) of 24 screws with penetration of the nerve root were located in the junction between the lower zone of the intervertebral foramen and the pedicle zone. No definite diagnosis of screw penetration of the nerve root could be made on axial CT scans, although scans can show that the screw is violating the foramen. Whether or not a screw violating the intertransverse foramen and affects the nerve root depends on its position on the oblique radiograph. It may be not necessary to remove or change the screw immediately if a longer screw is found in the upper portion of the intervertebral foramen on the oblique view and angled laterally on axial CT scan in a patient without radicular symptoms.     

Quantitative anatomy of the occiput and the biomechanics of occipital screw fixation

STUDY DESIGN: The surgically relevant osseous anatomy of the human anatomy was carefully studied and described. The stability of cortical and cancellous screws placed in anatomic sites commonly used for internal fixation of the occiput was tested. OBJECTIVES: To define the bony anatomy of the occiput in quantitative terms and to measure the ability of cortical and cancellous screws inserted at sites commonly used for internal fixation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: To the authors' knowledge, no previous studies described the gross anatomy of the occiput in specific relation to the internal venous structures in the cranium and to the biomechanical strength of screw fixation in different areas of the occiput. METHODS: Thirty-seven human occiputs were carefully measured using calipers. Thin sections from six such specimens were analyzed with specific attention to cortical thicknesses. Stability of screws placed in various locations in the occiput were tested in axial pullout. RESULTS: The thickness of the occiput varied from extremely thin to a 0.1-mm thickness in the region of the cerebellar fossa and increased to a maximum of 8.3 mm at the level of the superior nuchal line and at the transverse sulcus. Results of pullout testing showed that the cancellous screws were as strong as the cortical screws in this area. In areas of the occiput thicker than 7 mm, unicortical fixation was as strong as bicortical fixation. CONCLUSION: There is a wide variation in thickness of the bone of the occiput. The strength of screw fixation was proportional to the bone's thickness.     

Insertional torque and pull-out strengths of conical and cylindrical pedicle screws in cadaveric bone

STUDY DESIGN: Insertion torque and pull-out strengths of conical and cylindrical pedicle screws were compared in human cadaveric vertebral bodies. OBJECTIVES: To compare the performance of the conical design with the cylindrical design, and to determine whether insertional torque correlates with pull-out strength. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A tapered pedicle screw design may lessen the likelihood of implant failure. Its effect on thread purchase is not known. Previous studies of cylindrical designs on the relation between insertion torque and pull-out strength have been conducted in bovine and synthetic bone. METHODS: Seventy-eight pedicles were assigned randomly to one of the following pedicle screw: Texas Scottish Rite Hospital (Sofamor-Danek, Memphis, TN), Steffee VSP (Acromed, Cleveland, OH), Diapason (Dimso, Paris, France), AO Schanz (Synthes, Paoli, PA), or Synthes USS (Synthes, Paoli, PA). Pedicle screws were inserted with a torque screwdriver. Each screw was extracted axially from the pedicle at a rate of 1.0 mm/sec until failure using an MTS machine (Bionix 858, Minneapolis, MN). Force data were recorded. RESULTS: The conical design had the highest insertion torque. There were no significant differences in pull-out between any of the screw types. Correlation between insertional torque and pull-out strength was statistically significant only with the Texas Scottish Rite Hospital and Steffee VSP in L4 and AO Schanz in L5. CONCLUSIONS: A conical screw profile increases insertion torque, although insertional torque is not a reliable predictor of pull-out strength in cadaveric bone. Screw profile (with similar dimensions) has little effect on straight axial pull-out strengths in cadaveric bone.     

Anterior vertebral body screw pullout testing. A comparison of Zeilke, Kaneda, Universal Spine System, and Universal Spine System with pullout-resistant nut

STUDY DESIGN: A biomechanical study of pullout of anteriorly implanted screws in cadaveric vertebral bodies. OBJECTIVES: To investigate and compare the pullout strength of the Zielke, Kaneda, Universal Spine System (USS) pedicle screw, and USS pedicle screw with a new pullout-resistant nut. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A common problem with anterior purchase regardless of the implant system is screw pullout at the proximal and distal ends of multilevel constructs. There is limited information on a solution to this problem. METHODS: The L1 to L4 vertebral bodies from four cadavers had one each of Zielke and Kaneda pedicle screws (Acromed Corp., Cleveland, OH), USS pedicle screw (Synthes Spine, Paoli, PA), and USS pedicle screw with pullout-resistant nut implanted transversely across the center of the vertebral body with bicortical purchase in a similar fashion as would be used clinically. The screws were extracted using a servohydraulic material testing system. The maximum axial forces were recorded. RESULTS: The Zielke and Kaneda screws had no significant difference in mean pullout strength (P = 0.542). The USS screw alone was less strong (P = 0.009). The USS screw and pullout-resistant nut increased the pullout strength by twofold (P = 0.00006). In the screw pullout tests, the mode of failure was at the screw thread's interface. The USS screw and pullout-resistant nut failed by imploding the body around the nut. With the USS screw and pullout-resistant nut, the pullout strength was determined by the compressive strength of the bone. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of a pullout-resistant nut to an anterior vertebral body screw improves the pullout strength by twofold and changes the mode of failure to rely ultimately on the inherent vertebral body strength rather than the screw's characteristics. The addition of a pullout-resistant nut may be applicable to multilevel implant constructs to prevent screw pullout at the top and bottom.     

Transcutaneous or transconjunctival peribulbar anesthesia?

The complications of 648 consecutively inserted Universal AO pedicle screws (140 in the thoracic spine and 508 in the lumbar spine) performed by one surgical team to treat 91 patients with spinal problems, were reviewed. The spinal pathology consisted of: scoliosis (34 patients), degenerative lower lumbar spinal disease (25 patients), neoplastic spinal disease (11 patients), thoracic kyphosis (8 patients), spinal fractures (7 patients), lumbo-sacral spondylolisthesis (3 patients), and osteomyelitis (3 patients). Intraoperative complications were: screw misplacement (n = 3), nerve root impingement (n = 1), cerebrospinal fluid leak (n = 2) and pedicle fracture (n = 2). Postoperative complications were; deep wound infection (n = 4), screw loosening (n = 2) and rod-screw disconnection (n = 1). The conclusion was that pedicle screw fixation has an acceptable complication rate and neurological injury during this procedure is unlikely.     

Experimental analysis of functional stability of sagittal split ramus osteotomies secured by miniplates and position screws

PURPOSE: This study determined the relative functional stabilities of various miniplate systems and configurations used to stabilize sagittal split ramus osteotomies (SSROs) and compared them with conventional internal screw fixation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The biomechanical model was a reproducible prototype of a mandible sagittal osteotomy with consistent material and geometric properties. After advancing the distal segment by 7 mm, each set of mandible analogs (1 set = 3 analogs) was fixed bilaterally by one of three miniplate systems applied in various configurations, and tested with and without a supplemental 2.4-mm bicortical screw applied in the retromolar region. Reduced analogs were placed in a straining frame, and simulated masticatory loads were applied alternatively to the mandibular first molars. Ensuing osteotomy site displacements were measured by transducers attached to a computer-based data acquisition program. A coordinate transformation procedure was used to convert the component displacements captured by the individual transducers into a common "instability factor" to reflect fixation stability for each construct and loading condition. Instability factors for the individual constructs were compared with each other and with those obtained from analogs reduced exclusively with 2.4-mm position screws. RESULTS: Osteotomies stabilized with a combination of miniplates and position screws were more stable than those stabilized exclusively with miniplates (P < .0001). Post-hoc comparisons of mean instability factors (Dunnet's method) showed the miniplate-position screw combinations to be more stable than the 2.4-mm position screw system used as standard (P < .05). Miniplate systems alone were the least stable of the test constructs, with differential rates of failure between the individual miniplate systems. CONCLUSIONS: Exclusive use of miniplate fixation may not provide the consistent stability necessary for early functional restoration after SSROs. The addition of a position screw in the retromolar region substantially enhances the fixation stability of miniplate systems. The use of miniplates with retromolar position screws offers both technical and stability advantages over conventional miniplate or internal screw fixation. The fixation stability of the miniplate-position screw combination is independent of the type of miniplate system used.