Evaluation of the FlexSure HP whole blood antibody test for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection

OBJECTIVE: Rapid, inexpensive, reliable tests are needed to facilitate the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. We evaluated the accuracy of the new FlexSure HP whole blood test (SmithKline Diagnostics, Inc.), a rapid, qualitative in-office test for the detection of antibodies to H. pylori utilizing whole blood obtained from a fingerstick. METHODS: Five North American sites enrolled patients not previously treated for H. pylori who underwent upper endoscopy. Patients had not received antibiotics, bismuth, or proton pump inhibitors within 4 wk before study enrollment. Bacterial infection was established by the presence of H. pylori in gastric biopsies (minimum of two) or positive rapid urease test of antral tissue. The presence of IgG antibodies was determined using FlexSure HP whole blood tests with blood obtained by fingerstick and FlexSure HP serum and ELISA (HM-CAP) tests with serum obtained from venipuncture. RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-three patients were enrolled (56% male; mean age, 46.8 +/- 16.0 yr). H. pylori infection was present in 187 (48%). Compared with the standard of histology and rapid urease test, sensitivity for FlexSure HP whole blood, FlexSure HP serum, and HM-CAP EIA were, respectively, 84%, 90%, and 95% (p < 0.05 compared with FlexSure HP whole blood). There were no statistical differences in specificity or overall accuracy between the three tests. CONCLUSIONS: FlexSure HP whole blood demonstrated an accuracy not significantly different from the FlexSure HP serum test but had sensitivity significantly lower than the HM-CAP EIA. FlexSure HP whole blood may be useful for in-office H. pylori diagnosis.     

Clonidine and vasomotion physiology

BACKGROUND: Serological rapid whole-blood tests for the detection of H. pylori are presently being promoted for use in primary care. We conducted a multi-center study to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the Boehringer Mannheim Helicobacter pylori test (BM test), which is identical with the Cortecs Helisal test. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A previous diagnosis of H. pylori, a history of peptic ulcer diseases, or proton-pump inhibitor, bismuth or antibiotic use during the preceding month were exclusion criteria. The BM test was performed prior to endoscopy by 7 primary care physicians, 5 practicing gastroenterologists, or a single physician in the university hospital outpatient service. During endoscopy, antral and corpus biopsies were obtained for histology and rapid urease testing (RUT). H. pylori positivity was defined by histology and/or RUT as reference methods. H. pylori IgG-ELISA was performed additionally. RESULTS: Of the 203 patients included, 151 were H. pylori-positive by reference methods (74.4%). The overall accuracy of the BM test was 77.3%. Eight BM tests were indeterminate, and in the other 195 patients the test performed as follows: sensitivity 80.3%, specificity 81.3%, positive predictive value 92.9%, negative predictive value 57.4%. Using IgG-ELISA as reference, the BM test performance was similar. It also did not differ substantially among the three groups of physicians involved. CONCLUSIONS: We found the performance of the BM test to be insufficiently accurate, as both over- and underdiagnosis of H. pylori infection were not infrequent. This test needs to be improved before its use in primary care can be recommended.     

Evaluation of a new reagent strip rapid urease test for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND: Rapid urease tests are commonly used as a convenient method to detect Helicobacter pylori infection. Our previous experiments demonstrated enhanced efficacy of agar gel rapid urease test compared with reagent strip rapid urease tests. We evaluated the efficacy of PyloriTek, a new reagent strip rapid test for detecting H. pylori infection. METHODS: Gastric antral mucosal biopsy specimens were obtained for comparison between agar gel rapid urease tests and PyloriTek (200 specimens). The rapid urease test to be used first was selected randomly. H. pylori status was determined using the Genta stain. Culture was performed to confirm H. pylori status when false rapid urease tests were suspected. RESULTS: One hundred patients were studied; 68 had H. pylori infection. There were two false-negative and one false-positive PyloriTek when scored at 1 hour, compared with only one false-positive and no false-negative tests at 2 hours. With the agar gel rapid urease tests, there were no false-positive tests and 5 false-negative tests when scored at 1 hour, 2 false-negative tests at 12 hours and 1 at 24 hours; there were no false-positive tests. At 1 hour, 3% (95% CI = 1% to 9%) of PyloriTek tests had an erroneous categorization of H. pylori status compared with 5% for the agar gel rapid urease tests (95% CI = 1.6% to 11%) (p > 0.7). CONCLUSION: The new reagent strip rapid urease test, PyloriTek, is rapid and comparable in accuracy to agar gel rapid urease tests for detecting H. pylori Infection.     

Taking the low (stretch) road

Helicobacter pylori infection can be detected by several invasive tests based on gastroscopy and by noninvasive methods such as serologic assays. Noninvasive tests can be used not only in addition to invasive tests but also by themselves to screen for H. pylori infection in patients who are not in urgent need of endoscopy. Lately, rapid qualitative serologic tests have been developed. In the present study, the accuracy of a novel rapid whole-blood test, Pyloriset Screen, detecting immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA antibodies against H. pylori was evaluated. A total of 207 consecutive adult outpatients referred for upper endoscopy were enrolled. Gastric biopsy specimens were taken from the antrum and corpus for histologic examination and rapid urease testing. Cultures were available for 113 patients. Serum samples collected from all patients were tested for H. pylori antibodies by two enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) (Pyloriset EIA and an in-house EIA), a rapid latex agglutination test (Pyloriset Dry), and Pyloriset Screen. Patients were considered H. pylori positive if helicobacters were seen on histologic examination (77 patients) or, if in combination with histologically verified (although helicobacter-negative) gastritis, their IgG antibody titers were elevated in the two EIAs (five patients). The Pyloriset Screen test had a sensitivity of 95%, a specificity of 94%, a positive predictive value of 91%, and a negative predictive value of 97%. Among 63 patients under the age of 45 years, the Pyloriset Screen test did not miss a single H. pylori diagnosis, and only 1 patient had a false-positive result. Pyloriset Screen could be used reliably to screen for H. pylori infection.     

p53 expression is of independent predictive value in lymph node-negative breast carcinoma

OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of the most widely available tests for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection after antibiotic treatment. METHODS: A total of 59 H. pylori-positive, duodenal ulcer patients (mean age, 40.7 +/- 11.7 yr; 40 male and 19 female) were treated for 2 wk with either amoxicillin-metronidazole (n = 36) or omeprazole-amoxicillin-tinidazole (n = 23), and after 4 wk, were tested for H. pylori infection by [14C]urea breath test (UBT), serum IgG antibody level, and multiple antral biopsies for rapid urease testing, histology, Warthin-Starry stain, and polymerase chain reaction to detect H. pylori DNA. Infection status was established by a concordance of test results. RESULTS: H. pylori was eradicated in 47 patients (80%). UBT and rapid urease testing had the best sensitivity and specificity, although not statistically different to Warthin-Starry stain and polymerase chain reaction. Serology and histology had little diagnostic value in this setting due to high proportion of false-positive results. CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive UBT is as accurate in predicting H. pylori status after antibiotic treatment as rapid urease testing and Warthin-Starry stain. Especially for duodenal ulcer patients, UBT could be considered the gold standard to confirm eradication of H. pylori.     

The impact of Helicobacter pylori eradication on peptic ulcer healing

OBJECTIVE: Current literature was reviewed analyzing the outcome of peptic ulcer healing in relation to the results of the posttherapeutic Helicobacter pylori (HP) status. METHODS: Literature was reviewed along with an analysis of 60 studies, comprising a total of 4329 patients. RESULTS: Successful Helicobacter pylori eradication was found to induce a better response in peptic ulcer healing, regardless of diagnosis: gastric ulcer 88% vs 73% (odds ratio [OR] 2.7, p < 0.01), duodenal ulcer 95% vs 76% (OR 5.6, p < 0.0001), and peptic ulcer 95% vs 76% (OR 6.6, p < 0.0001), for patients having their HP infection successfully cured versus those remaining HP-positive, respectively (Fisher's exact test). For all evaluated time points (< or = 6, 7-8, and 10-12 wk after beginning treatment), HP-negative patients had higher healing rates than HP-positive patients (95% vs 82%, 94% vs 69%, and 96% vs 78% with corresponding OR of 4.2, 6.5, and 7.4, all p < 0.0001, Fisher's exact test). The use of concomitant acid suppression therapy during initial HP eradication provided a benefit on peptic ulcer healing only for patients with persistent HP infection (improved healing rates of 78% vs 67%; otherwise rates were 94-96%). Likewise, prolonged acid inhibition in HP treatment failures after the initial HP treatment phase resulted in 7-20% improved healing rates, whereas patients becoming HP-negative did not profit. CONCLUSION: Successful HP eradication therapy accelerates peptic ulcer healing even without concomitant acid suppression.     

Subacute cerebellar degeneration as a remote effect of breast cancer

Screening tests for IG g antibodies against Helicobacter pylori are usefull for a long follow up of patients who were well eradicated. The aim of this study was to determinate and compared sensibility, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of six qualitative serological tests for IG g antibodies detection in the diagnosis of H. Pylori infections. Between May and October 1996 52 patients (30 males and 22 females; median age 42.4 years, range 21-68) with H. Pylori infection assessed on two antral and two corpus biopsies by means of Giema stain and a rapid urease test were tested for IG g antibodies detection. The serological tests used were: Inmunocomb II (Orgenics) Enzimo Inmuno Assay Inmunoadsorbent qualitative, Flex Pack (Smith Kline Diagnostics, Abbott) inmunocromatographic cualitative, Pylori Stat test (Biowhittaker) Enzimo Inmuno Assay (ELISA) qualitative, Premier (Meridian Diagnostics) Enzimo Inmuno Assay ELISA) qualitative. Pyloristest (Orion Diagnóstica) latex aglutination qualitative, H. Pylori (Bio Tre) Enzimo Inmuno Assay cualitative. 10 healthy subjects with negative gastric biopsies and negative rapid ureasa test were used as control group. The six evaluated serological tests have a comparable sensibility (89-95%) and specificity (77-83%) for the diagnosis of HP infection. The presence of specific HP antibodies in infected patients revealed a strong correlation with the histological demonstration of the microrganisms. We can recommend this qualitative serological tests due to their high sensibility and specificity, simplicity and low cost.     

Usefulness of Leifson staining method in diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection

The Leifson staining method was used to diagnose Helicobacter pylori infection and was compared to histology, culture, and the rapid urease test (RUT). Histology gave the best sensitivity (98%), compared to Leifson staining (97%), culture (92%), and RUT (85%) (P < 0.005). Leifson staining is a sensitive, rapid, economical method for diagnosis of H. pylori infection in dyspeptic patients.     

Amoxycillin resistance is one reason for failure of amoxycillin-omeprazole treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of omeprazole and amoxycillin dual therapy to treat Helicobacter pylori infection has been inconsistent, suggesting the presence of host or bacterial factors influencing treatment success. The aim of this study was to assess the role of pre-treatment amoxycillin resistance in the efficacy of omeprazole and amoxycillin dual therapy. METHODS: We studied 43 consecutive dyspeptic patients with H. pylori infection. Pre-treatment H. pylori infection was established by the combination of positive rapid urease test, culture and histology. Amoxycillin susceptibility testing was performed by an Epsilometer test (E-test) method and amoxycillin resistance was defined as minimum inhibitory concentration greater than 8 microg/mL. Patients received 20 mg omeprazole twice daily for 28 days and amoxycillin 1000 mg twice daily for 2 weeks. Adverse effects were documented using a questionnaire. H. pylori status was reassessed 6-8 weeks after the end of treatment by rapid urease testing and histological examination of gastric biopsies. RESULTS: Forty-two dyspeptic patients completed the study, and one patient dropped out. H. pylori infection was cured in 2 3 of 42 patients (55%). The cure rate was higher in patients harbouring amoxycillin-sensitive organisms than in those with resistant strains: 66% (19/29) vs. 31% (4/13), respectively (P = 0.049). No significant differences in cure rates were evident in relation to age, sex, smoking habits or compliance. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of amoxycillin-omeprazole dual therapy was greatly reduced in the presence of pre-treatment amoxycillin-resistant H. pylori. The success rate in patients with amoxycillin-sensitive H. pylori was only 66%, suggesting the presence of additional factors affecting the efficacy of this therapy.     

An evaluation of whole blood testing for Helicobacter pylori in general practice

BACKGROUND: Rapid whole blood tests for Helicobacter pylori infection were developed to assist in the management of patients with dyspepsia in general practice. However, they have not been extensively tested in this setting. AIM: To investigate the test characteristics of the BM-Test (Helisal Quick Test) when used in general practice. METHOD: One hundred and ten dyspeptic patients attending local general practitioners were recruited into the study. The BM-Test was administered by the general practitioner at the screening visit according to standard instructions supplied with the test kit. The patient was then referred to Nepean or Mornington Peninsula Hospitals for further assessment. including a 14C-urea breath test. The test kit was forwarded to the appropriate hospital centre for an independent, blinded reading. The sensitivity and specificity of the BM-Test were evaluated against the results of the 14C-UBT. RESULTS: Based on general practitioner readings, the BM-Test had a sensitivity of 59.3% and a specificity of 90.2%. The positive and negative predictive values were 87.5% and 65.7%, respectively. When based on independent readings, sensitivity rose to 71.2% and specificity fell to 88.2%. The BM-Test was more sensitive for older patients than for younger patients when based on both the general practitioner and independent readings. CONCLUSION: The BM-Test performs below the generally recommended sensitivity and specificity of 90% required for clinical practice.     

Combined intramuscular-intradermal protocol of universal neonate HB vaccination irrespective of mother''s status of HBsAg

BACKGROUND: The usefulness of the rapid urease test (RUT) in diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infection after peptic ulcer surgery is unknown. METHODS: Patients who had undergone peptic ulcer surgery were offered endoscopic examination if they presented with dyspepsia or gastrointestinal bleeding. Biopsy specimens were taken for RUT and histology from the corpus and the stoma in patients who had undergone partial gastrectomy or from the corpus and the antrum in patients who had undergone vagotomy. Histologic examination using haematoxylin and eosin stain and Warthin-Starry stain were used as the gold standard. RESULTS: Ninety patients were studied (69 had partial gastrectomy and 21 had vagotomy). Forty-three patients (32 in the partial gastrectomy group and 11 in the vagotomy group) were positive for H. pylori by histology. The respective sensitivity of RUT was 59% (stoma) and 75% (corpus) in the partial gastrectomy group (P = 0.36) and 55% (antrum) and 73% (corpus) in the vagotomy group (P = 0.51). CONCLUSIONS: RUT is not sensitive for detecting H. pylori after acid reduction surgery.     

Detection methods of Helicobacter pylori: accuracy and costs

A variety of methods exist for determining gastric colonization with Helicobacter pylori, which has been implicated in the development of peptic ulcer disease. The goal of this study was to evaluate four of the current methods available in a clinical surgical practice setting through a prospective evaluation of 40 consecutive patients undergoing upper diagnostic endoscopy. All patients underwent six antral gastric biopsies for use with the following detection methods: histologic demonstration of organisms (hematoxylin and eosin stain), direct detection of urease activity (Remel Selective Rapid Urea, Lenexa, KS), and culture of H. pylori. All patients also had measurement of serum immunoglobulin G for H. pylori by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method (Corning Clinical Laboratories, St. Louis, MO). The infection status was established by a concordance of test results. The results show that H. pylori can be assessed equally well with histology, a rapid urease test, and serology, with all three tests having good sensitivity (92-100%) and specificity (85-96%). The culturing of the organism had poor sensitivity (42%). The benefits of the urease test are a much more rapid response time and a much lower cost as compared to histologic and serologic testing. In conclusion, the rapid urease test is the method of choice to detect H. pylori in those patients undergoing endoscopy in whom the identification of H. pylori will change their management.     

Transmission electron and atomic force microscopic observation of polysomes on carbon-coated grids prepared by surface spreading

BACKGROUND: A number of noncommercial preparations of urease test have been described. The present prospective study evaluated the accuracy of one such preparation for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. METHODS: From February 1996 to November 1996, all patients undergoing elective upper endoscopy in a single endoscopy facility were included. Three antral biopsy specimens were taken. Two specimens were subjected to histologic examination, and one specimen was placed into a "locally made rapid urease test" (LRUT). Results of histologic examinations were taken as standards for comparison. The final result of LRUT was obtained on scrutiny of color changes at 4 hours after the start of the test. RESULTS: Two thousand three hundred sixteen patients (male/female = 1.5:1) with a mean age of 56.7 +/- 0.4 years were included. Five hundred sixty-two patients (24.3%) had a history of eradication treatment for H. pylori. Nine hundred fifty-three patients (41.1%) were found to be positive for H. pylori on histologic examination. In patients in whom a history of eradication therapy was absent, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the LRUT were 92.8%, 97.6%, 97.5%, and 93.0%, respectively. In patients with a history of eradication treatment, the corresponding figures were 76.1%, 99.6%, 96.2%, and 96.9%. CONCLUSIONS: The locally made rapid urease test provides a simple, safe, rapid, inexpensive, and accurate test for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection.     

Pain from herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia

Under observation there were 82 patients operated on for ulcer disease of the stomach and duodenum. Dissemination of the mucosa with Helicobacter pylori (HP) was studied by means of using the urease test. Before the operation the positive result of the study was obtained in 73 patients (89%). In 1-6 months after the operation the HP infection was found in 29 patients (39.7%). The HP persistence retained in 39.7% of the patients subjected to resection of the stomach in spite of the preoperative treatment including De-nol and Metronidazole. Post-resectional reflux-gastritis and anastomositis were more pronounced in HP carriers. The antireflux variants of anastomoses (transversal, terminolateral gastroduodenal anastomosis and gastrojejunal anastomosis by Roux) were followed by much less HP persistence and less frequent cases of anastomositis and gastritis of the gastric stump.     

Midazolam improves postoperative epidural analgesia with continuous infusion of local anaesthetics

BACKGROUND: A number of triple drug regimens using proton pump inhibitors and two antibiotics have been evaluated in the West and reported to achieve Helicobacter pylori eradication rates of over 90%. In developing countries however, these combinations have neither been well evaluated, nor the optimum treatment for H. pylori infection well defined. AIM: To compare the combination of a proton pump inhibitor with a nitroimidazole and another antibiotic in eradicating H. pylori infection and healing duodenal ulcer. METHODS: Sixty consecutive patients with active duodenal ulcer who were positive for H. pylori (by rapid urease test and 14C-urea breath test) were randomized into three treatments groups: (1) LAS (n=21): lansoprazole 30 mg o.m., amoxycillin 500 mg q.d.s. and secnidazole 2 g on alternate days for 2 weeks; (2) LCS (n=18): lansoprazole 30 mg o.m., clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. and secnidazole 2 g on alternate days for 1 week; (3) LPS (n=21): lansoprazole 30 mg o.m., pefloxacin 400 mg o.m. and secnidazole 2 g on alternate days for 2 weeks. Urease and breath tests were performed at 0, 6 and 12 weeks to check for H. pylori eradication. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat eradication rates were as follows: LAS 86%, LCS 83%, LPS 71%; the overall ulcer healing rate was 90% at 6 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: High H. pylori eradication rates were achieved using the amoxycillin- and clarithromycin-based therapies. Fewer side-effects, better compliance and low cost favoured the amoxycillin-based therapy.     

Helicobacter pylori infection and peptic ulcer disease in cirrhosis

An increased frequency of peptic ulcer disease is noted in patients with cirrhosis, but the role of H. pylori in this disorder remains to be determined. The diagnosis of cirrhosis was confirmed by a combination of clinical, biochemical, radiological, and histological methods. The severity of cirrhosis was assessed by Pugh's modification of Child's criteria. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed consecutively to evaluate the presence of varices and gastroduodenal mucosa. H. pylori status was assessed by histology, urease test, and serology. In all, 130 patients with cirrhosis were recruited into the study; there were 86 males and 44 females with a mean (SD) age of 54.4 (12.7) years. The H. pylori prevalence was 76.2%. There was no difference in age between the H. pylori-positive and -negative cirrhotics (P = 0.29). The H. pylori prevalence revealed no difference among cirrhotics with Child A (77.8%), Child B (72.9%), and Child C (78.6%) (P = 0.8), and neither was there a difference in H. pylori prevalence in cirrhotics with and without congestive gastropathy (77% vs 73.7%, P = 0.84). The prevalence of H. pylori in cirrhotics with and without varices did not show a statistical difference (75% vs 81.8%, P = 0.68). There also was no difference in the H. pylori prevalence between cirrhotic patients with and without peptic ulcers (84.4% vs 69.7%, P = 0.09). In conclusion, the prevalence of H. pylori or peptic ulcer is independent of the severity of cirrhotic liver disease. The association between H. pylori infection and peptic ulcer disease is weak in cirrhosis.     

Cytotoxin genes of Helicobacter pylori in chronic gastritis, gastroduodenal ulcer and gastric cancer: an age and gender matched case-control study

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is involved in many gastrointestinal diseases, such as chronic gastritis (CAG), peptic ulcer and gastric cancer (GCA). Both host factors and H. pylori strain differences may contribute to differences in the diseases. Thus, we conducted an age and gender matched case-control study of 35 patients each with CAG, gastric ulcer (GUL), duodenal ulcer (DUL) and gastric cancer (GCA) to examine the role of strain differences of the H. pylori cytotoxin genes cagA and vacA in these diseases. We employed polymerase chain reaction to examine the gastric juice for H. pylori DNA. The test was positive for 26 (74.3%) CAG, 29 (82.9%) GUL, 28 (80.0%) DUL and 27 (77.1%) GCA patients, showing no statistically significant difference among the diseases (P = 0.84). cagA and vacA genes (picked up by using a vacA1 + vacA2 primer pair which detected non-variable regions of the vacA gene) were detected by PCR in the H. pylori DNA-positive cases as follows: CAG, 92.3% and 76.9%; GUL, 100% and 86.2%; DUL, 89.3% and 89.3%; GCA, 92.6% and 85.2%, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found in the frequencies of these cytotoxin genes in H. pylori-positive cases among the various gastric diseases (P = 0.39 for cagA and P = 0.64 for vacA).     

Touch cytology. A reliable and cost-effective method for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection

A variety of reliable methods are available for detecting Helicobacter pylori (Hp) during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. We evaluated the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of rapid urease test (RUT), touch cytology (TC), and histology (H). Two hundred thirty-eight consecutive patients (178 without previous medical treatment and 60 formerly treated with anti-Hp therapy) were tested for Hp infection by RUT, TC, and H (H&E stain). The infection status for each patient was established by a concordance of two test results. The time to carry out the three tests and their cost were also calculated. Sensitivity of TC (100%) was significantly higher than that of RUT (86.8%; P < 0.001), but not than that of H (94.9%). RUT was significantly more specific than H (100% vs 95.6%; P < 0.05), but not than TC (96.4%). Hp infection was more frequent in the patients with chronic active gastritis than in those with chronic nonactive gastritis (P < 0.001). No Hp infection was detected in absence of chronic antral inflammation. RUT resulted the cheapest method and H the most expensive; TC is faster and cheaper than H. When additional information about the severity of mucosal damage or the presence of cell atypias is not necessary, histologic examination can be omitted, and a cost-effective strategy for assessing Hp status might consist in taking two antral biopsies, the former for performing RUT and the latter for preparing a slide by TC, which should be stained and examined only when the RUT result is negative.     

Evaluation of a serological test for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in children

A serological test for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection (Cobas Core Roche, IgG, 2nd Generation; Roche, France) was compared with the examination of biopsy samples (culture and histology) obtained after endoscopy in 115 children to assess its value. In 94 children (42 positive and 52 negative), results were concordant. In 10 children a positive serological test was associated with an absence of Helicobacter pylori, while in 11 others a negative serological test was associated with a positive culture. Sensitivity of the test was 79.2% and specificity 83.9%. A relationship between IgG titers and age (r = 0.31, p < 0.05) was found. Serological tests could be useful for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection, but a negative test result does not rule out infection, particularly in children under 10 years of age.     

Evaluation of high-resolution CT and MR cisternography in the diagnosis of cerebrospinal fluid fistula

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Whether inflammation of the cardia indicates gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and/or is a manifestation of pangastritis caused by Helicobacter pylori infection is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between cardia inflammation, H. pylori infection, and cardia intestinal metaplasia in patients with and without GERD. METHODS: Patients with GERD were compared with controls undergoing endoscopy for a variety of other conditions. Endoscopic biopsy specimens from the distal esophagus and cardia, fundus, and antrum were evaluated for inflammation, H. pylori infection, and intestinal metaplasia. RESULTS: Neither the prevalence of H. pylori infection (controls, 48%; GERD, 41%) nor cardia inflammation (controls, 41%; GERD, 40%) differed between groups. All 11 controls and 22 of 23 patients with GERD (96%) and cardia inflammation had H. pylori infection. Esophagitis was more common among GERD patients (33%) than controls (7%; P = 0.01). Cardia intestinal metaplasia was more common among controls (22%) than GERD patients (3%; P = 0.01); all had cardia inflammation, 7 had H. pylori infection, and 6 had metaplasia elsewhere in the stomach. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of cardia inflammation is similar in patients with and without GERD and is associated with H. pylori infection (P < 0.001). Cardia intestinal metaplasia is associated with H. pylori-related cardia inflammation (P = 0.01) and intestinal metaplasia elsewhere in the stomach, indicating that it is distinct from Barrett's esophagus.