Treatment of human pulmonary paragonimiasis with triclabendazole: clinical tolerance and drug efficacy

We report the anesthetic management of a patient with aortitis syndrome using combined spinal and epidural anesthesia. A 28-year-old gravida with aortitis syndrome accompanied by faints was scheduled for an urgent cesarean section. Combined spinal and epidural anesthesia was thought to be better for this case in order to monitor the cerebral circulation by her consciousness level and to reduce the hemodynamic change during surgery as compared to spinal or epidural anesthesia alone. After inserting an epidural catheter at the Th 12/L 1 interspace, spinal anesthesia was performed with 1.5 ml of 0.3% dibucaine at the L 4/L 5 interspace. The level of analgesia was under L 1 with the pinprick method 10 min after the spinal anesthesia. Next, 5 ml of 1.5% mepivacaine was injected through the epidural catheter. The level of analgesia reached to Th 6 without major hemodynamic changes. A healthy 2740 g infant was delivered and she had an uneventful recovery. We conclude that combined spinal and epidural anesthesia is useful in a patient with aortitis syndrome undergoing an urgent cesarean section in order to monitor the cerebral circulation by the consciousness level and to reduce the hemodynamic change.     

Erythrocyte Na/K ATPase activity and diabetes: relationship with C-peptide level

The purpose of this study is to clarify the volume effect of epidural saline injection 20 min after spinal anesthesia. Thirty patients undergoing combined spinal and epidural anesthesia for orthopedic surgery were randomly divided into two groups: a control group (n = 15) and a saline group (n = 15). In the control group, 2% lidocaine 3 ml with 0.4% tetracaine was injected into the subarachnoid space from L 4-5 interspace using Durasafe (Becton Dickinson, USA) and saline was not injected into the epidural space. In the saline group, saline 10 ml was injected through an epidural catheter 20 min after spinal anesthesia. The levels of analgesia 20 min after spinal anesthesia were not significantly different between the groups. However, the levels of analgesia 3, 5, 10, 40 and 100 min after epidural saline injection in the saline group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The highest analgesic level was obtained 10 min after epidural saline injection and reached to T 4.3 +/- 1.1. In conclusion, epidural saline injection increases the analgesic level 20 min after spinal anesthesia because of the volume effect.     

Pharmacology of local anesthetics and clinical aspects of segmental blocking. II. Spinal anesthesia

Clinical picture of development of segmental blocking after subarachnoidal injection of hyperbaric solutions of 0.75% bupivacaine, 5% ultracaine, and isobaric 0.5% bupivacaine is studied. A total of 152 patients operated on the lower part of the body and the lower limbs were examined under conditions of single, prolonged subarachnoidal, and combined spinal epidural anesthesia. Ultracaine and bupivacaine in different concentrations with different barism provided anesthesia equivalent by the efficacy, depth, and dissemination of sensory block. Segmental blocking with 5% ultracaine was characterized by the shortest latent period (3.14 +/- 0.16 min, p < 0.05) but was no shorter (124.1 +/- 3.37 min) than operative analgesia with 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine (120.0 +/- 5.10 min). Isobaric bupivacaine provided the longest effective analgesia (215.0 +/- 45.0 min, p < 0.05). Microcatheter technique improved the safety and control of subarachnoidal anesthesia in comparison with a single injection, and combined spinal epidural anesthesia shortened the latent period of segmental blocking and ensured intraoperative anesthesia and postoperative analgesia at the expense of the epidural component.     

Deliberate hypotensive epidural anesthesia for patients with normal and low cardiac output

The use of hypotensive anesthesia is contraindicated in patients with ventricular dysfunction, even though afterload reduction often improves ventricular performance. The purpose of this study was to prospectively assess systemic hemodynamic responses to deliberate hypotension with epidural anesthesia in patients with chronic left ventricular dysfunction. Hemodynamic measurements were performed in 29 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty under deliberate hypotensive epidural anesthesia using low-dose intravenous epinephrine infusion to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) at 50-60 mm Hg. Intraoperative MAP decreased from 100 +/- 16 to 56 +/- 9 mm Hg by 30 min after epidural injection (P < 0.0005). Concurrently, cardiac index (CI) increased from a preanesthetic baseline value of 2.9 +/- 0.5 to 3.3 +/- 0.9 L.min-1.m-2 at 30 min (P < 0.005) after epidural injection and stroke volume index (SVI) increased from 41 +/- 8 to 50 +/- 14 mL.beat-1.m-2 30 min after epidural injection (P < 0.005). Heart rate and central venous and pulmonary artery diastolic pressures were maintained under hypotension with epidural anesthesia in all patients. During deliberate hypotension with epidural anesthesia, patients with a history of congestive heart failure or low preanesthetic CI (< or = 2.5 L.kg-1.m-2) increased their CI and SVI into the normal range. There were no significant perioperative complications in either of these groups. Hypotensive epidural anesthesia can be used successfully in patients with low cardiac output from ventricular dysfunction undergoing total hip arthroplasty.     

Influence of anesthetic technique in postoperative analgesia in thoracic surgery

OBJECTIVE: To compare the intensity of postoperative pain after thoracotomy with 2 anesthetic techniques: 1) thoracic epidural block with bupivacaine administered before surgery (combined anesthesia with isoflurane) and 2) conventional balanced anesthesia with isoflurane and endovenous fentanyl. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients scheduled for thoracotomy by lateral incision (T5-T6) were randomly divided into 2 groups of 15. Group A received 8 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine with adrenalin 1:200.000 30 min before start of surgery while group B received 8 ml saline solution through an epidural catheter inserted to T4-T8. Combined anesthesia (4 ml 0.5% bupivacaine through an epidural catheter 150 min after the first dose and isoflurane in 100% oxygen) was used in group A. Group B received balanced anesthesia with endovenous fentanyl 2.5 micrograms/kg and isoflurane in 100% oxygen. The difference in pain intensity during postoperative recovery was assessed by way of the following variables: number of boluses administered by epidural patient-controlled analgesia (bupivacaine 0.0625% and fentanyl 6 micrograms/ml); score on a visual analog scale of 10 at baseline and at 1, 3, 7, 11, 19 and 43 hours after surgery; and need for additional analgesia (diclofenac) during the 43 hours of study. Arterial gases were measured during the preoperative period and at 1, 3, 7, 19 and 43 hours after surgery. RESULTS: No significant differences in pain intensity measured on the visual analog scale, by the number of boluses per patients or by need for additional analgesia were found between the 2 groups. The total number of boluses administered and additional analgesic requirements were greater in the group receiving bupivacaine, although the difference was not significant (p = 0.095 and p = 0.056, respectively). Nor were there significant differences in pH and PaCO2 levels for the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Analgesic efficacy after thoracotomy was similar for our 2 groups receiving either combined anesthesia (epidural bupivacaine at 0.5% and isoflurane) or balanced anesthesia with isoflurane and endovenous fentanyl.     

Epidural anesthesia impairs both central and peripheral thermoregulatory control during general anesthesia

BACKGROUND: The authors tested the hypotheses that: (1) the vasoconstriction threshold during combined epidural/general anesthesia is less than that during general anesthesia alone; and (2) after vasoconstriction, core cooling rates during combined epidural/general anesthesia are greater than those during general anesthesia alone. Vasoconstriction thresholds and heat balance were evaluated under controlled circumstances in volunteers, whereas the clinical importance of intraoperative thermoregulatory vasoconstriction was evaluated in patients. METHODS: Five volunteers were each evaluated twice. On one of the randomly ordered days, epidural anesthesia (approximately T9 dermatomal level) was induced and maintained with 2-chloroprocaine. On both study days, general anesthesia was induced and maintained with isoflurane (0.7% end-tidal concentration), and core hypothermia was induced by surface cooling and continued for at least 1 h after fingertip vasoconstriction was observed. Patients undergoing colorectal surgery were randomly assigned to combined epidural/enflurane anesthesia (n = 13) or enflurane alone (n = 13). In appropriate patients, epidural anesthesia was maintained by an infusion of bupivacaine. The core temperature that triggered fingertip vasoconstriction identified the threshold. RESULTS: In the volunteers, the vasoconstriction threshold was 36.0 +/- 0.2 degrees C during isoflurane anesthesia alone, but significantly less, 35.1 +/- 0.7 degrees C, during combined epidural/isoflurane anesthesia. Cutaneous heat loss and the rates of core cooling were similar 30 min before vasoconstriction with and without epidural anesthesia. In the 30 min after vasoconstriction, heat loss decreased 33 +/- 13 W when the volunteers were given isoflurane alone, but only 8 +/- 16 W during combined epidural/isoflurane anesthesia. Similarly, the core cooling rates in the 30 min after vasoconstriction were significantly greater during combined epidural/isoflurane anesthesia (0.8 +/- 0.2 degrees C/h) than during isoflurane alone (0.2 +/- 0.1 degrees C/h). In the patients, end-tidal enflurane concentrations were slightly, but significantly, less in the patients given combined epidural/enflurane anesthesia (0.6 +/- 0.2% vs. 0.8 +/- 0.2%). Nonetheless, the vasoconstriction threshold was 34.5 +/- 0.6 degrees C in the epidural/enflurane group, which was significantly less than that in the other patients, 35.6 +/- 0.8 degrees C. When the study ended after 3 h of anesthesia, patients given combined epidural/enflurane anesthesia were 1.2 degrees C more hypothermic than those given general anesthesia alone. The rate of core cooling during the last hour of the study was 0.4 +/- 0.2 degrees C/h during combined epidural/enflurane anesthesia, but only 0.1 +/- 0.3 degrees C/h during enflurane alone. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that epidural anesthesia reduces the vasoconstriction threshold during general anesthesia. Furthermore, the markedly reduced rate of core cooling during general anesthesia alone illustrates the importance of leg vasoconstriction in maintaining core temperature.     

Modeling and measurement of the spontaneous mutation rate in mammalian cells

In order to examine the respiratory effects of tonic-clonic seizures and their treatment with i.v. diazepam or lorazepam, we utilized a spontaneously breathing piglet seizure model. A tracheostomy, arterial catheter, and epidural electrodes were inserted and pigs were maintained under ketamine anesthesia. After baseline recordings, seizures were induced with a pentylenetetrazol (PTZ) bolus and a 20 min infusion (5-6 mg/kg/min). After 10 min of PTZ infusion, randomly assigned animals received diazepam (D; N = 7; 0.5 mg/kg), lorazepam (L; N = 7; 0.2 mg/kg), or 0.9% saline (C; N = 7; controls) by rapid peripheral vein injection. Minute ventilation (Ve), Pa(CO2), and the pressure change in response to airway occlusion at end-expiration (P0.1) were measured at standard intervals. All groups had comparable increases in respiratory drive during untreated seizures. Changes in Ve and P0.1 were reduced to at or below baseline values in groups D and L, but not C, from 2 to 45 min after treatment (P < 0.05). No significant changes were observed in Pa(CO2) after either intervention. Following anticonvulsants, the cumulative duration of seizures was significantly reduced in L and D groups, compared to C (P < 0.05). We conclude that increases in respiratory drive occur during tonic-clonic seizures induced with PTZ. Amelioration of seizure activity with lorazepam or diazepam results in a reduction in respiratory drive, but not respiratory failure, in this tracheostomized model.     

Evaluation of the effectiveness of anecaine in central segmental blockades in orthopedic-traumatologic interventions

Efficacy of anecaine (A) (bupivacaine, Pliva) and marcaine (M) (bupivacaine, Astra) in central neuroaxial block combined with sedation is compared. In the group with epidural block (n = 167, ASA I-III), 102 patients were given anecaine and 65 marcaine in equivalent doses. In the group with spinal block (n = 82, ASA I-III), anecaine was administered to 52 and marcaine to 30 patients. In the epidural block group a catheter was placed at L2-3 or L3-4 with cranial direction. A test dose of bupivacaine (20 mg) was followed after 5-7 min by the main dose of 2 mg.kg-20 mg. Propofol was given for partial suppression of consciousness at a continuous infusion rate 1.6 mg.kg.hr. In spinal block group, bolus dose of bupivacaine (10-20 mg) was injected through the subarachnoidal approach at L2-3 or L3-4. Diazepam (0.1 mg.kg.hr) was used for sedation. Block onset, duration of sensor and motor block, and of effective analgesia were evaluated in all groups. Hemodynamics and respiratory function were monitored. Moderate hypotension (16-17% decline from basic values) was observed in all patients irrespective of bupivacaine brand. In a comparative non-randomized study anecaine showed a faster onset of block and longer duration of clinical effect than marcaine in epidural and spinal anesthesia for orthopedic surgery on the lower limbs.     

Combined spinal and epidural anesthesia for cesarean section in a parturient with moyamoya disease

We present the case of a parturient with moyamoya disease admitted to the hospital for elective cesarean section. Combined spinal and epidural technique was chosen because it allows better analgesia than epidural anesthesia and more hemodynamic stability than either general or spinal anesthesia. Ropivacaine was the local anesthetic of choice for the epidural portion because of the wide sensory-motor dissociation, thus preserving adequate respiration in the case of a high block.     

Value of combined spinal and epidural anesthesia in the management of peroperative analgesia in prosthetic surgery of the lower limb. Prospective study of 68 cases

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Efficient peri-operative analgesia is more comfortable, allows earlier mobilisation and better functional results for lower limb arthroplasties. We report our 60 cases prospective study of combined spinal and epidural anesthesia, and expose interests of this technique to control peri-operative pain. MATERIALS: From 1994 to 1995, 60 patients ASA class 1 were operated: 45 total hip replacement (THR), 15 total knee replacement (TKR). The average age was sixty five years (range thirty nine to eighty five years). Combined spinal and epidural anesthesia was performed in every case. METHODS: In lateral decubitus position, a translucent 25 Gauge needle was introduced in L2-L3 interspace. In a first time spinal anesthesia was made with 20 mg Bupivacaine. In a second time, a lumbar epidural catheter was inserted. All patients received an epidural post-operative analgesia with 4 mg Morphine once a day during two days and intravenous Paracetamol. Visual analogue scale (0 to 10) (VAS) were recorded after the third post operative hour and every twelve hours. During this period satisfaction mark was also recorded (1 to 3). RESULTS: We didn't observe any case of respiratory depression or infection with the epidural catheter. We observed 10 cases of pruritus (one needed to stop protocol) and 18 urinary retentions. Six uretral catheters were necessary; we had one case of pyelonephritis (escherichia coli). The first micturition was obtained 13.5 hours after the end of surgery. For the fifty nine remaining patients, visual analogue scale was always inferior or equal to 2/10 and the satisfaction mark to 1/3. DISCUSSION: Different techniques allow peri-operative analgesia, but a few are efficient during the first two days. Plexus nerve blocks are simple and reliable but post-operative anesthesia is short (inferior to 15 hours). Intravenous morphine controlled by patients themselves with programmed display needs expensive and sophisticated material. The principal risk is respiratory depression. Epidural morphine has a lower respiratory depression risk, but needs a heavier technique. The principal problems is higher incidence of urinary side effects. Epidural anesthesia might tend to show a greater efficacity with the best visual analogue scale and satisfaction mark. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that combined spinal and epidural anesthesia for the management of peri-operative pain provide an excellent pain control with a daily morphine injection. For lower limb arthroplasties, visual analogue scale is always inferior or equal to 2 and satisfaction mark equal to 1.     

Changes in human evoked spinal potentials (ESP) by epidural lidocaine

Controversies exist on the sites of action of epidural anesthesia. Leading opinion says that it works on spinal nerve root. We examined ESP and tactile sensations in 4 patients during epidural anesthesia with lidocaine to determine the effects of the anesthesia on spinal cord. Prolongation of latency and decrease in amplitude of ESP appeared 10 min after injection of 1.5% lidocaine 4 ml, each parameter reaching maximum value of 115% and 60% of the control value 30 min afterwards, respectively. Then they started to recover slowly, reaching normal values 150 min later. Changes in ESP and tactile sensation were closely related. Decreases in amplitude to 90%, 80%, 60% of the control values were observed for hypesthesia, analgesia, and anesthesia, respectively. We conclude that the spinal cord also is an important site of action of epidural anesthesia.     

Peridural anesthesia versus subarachnoid anesthesia in cesarean section. Prospective clinical study

OBJECTIVE: To compare technical and clinical differences between epidural and spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized prospective trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 64 pregnant women at term scheduled for elective cesarean section. Two groups were randomized: A) PD Group (n = 32): continuous epidural anesthesia by administration of bupivacaine 0.5% plus epinephrine 1/400,000 via an epidural catheter. Epidural morphine 3 mg was administered at the end of surgery. B) SP Group (n = 32): "single shot" spinal anesthesia by intrathecal administration of hyperbaric 1% bupivacaine 1-1.4 ml plus morphine 0.2 mg. The pin prick block level reached T2-T6 at incision time. DATA COLLECTION: 1) Time from the beginning of anesthesia to surgical incision. 2) Hypotension episodes. 3) Ephedrine consumption. 4) Intraoperative discomfort at delivery, traction and uterine manipulation, peritoneal toilette. 5) Nausea and vomiting. 6) Apgar score. 7) Postoperative headache. RESULTS: Women in the SP group had more hypotensive episodes (81% vs 53%: p < 0.05) and more ephedrine consumption with a large individual variability (29.12 mg +/- 20.4 vs 12.83 +/- 13.8: p < 0.01) when compared to PD group, without any difference in the Apgar score. The SP group required less time consumption (10.5 min. +/- 6.7 vs 35.9 min. +/- 17.3: p < 0.01) and had less intraoperative discomfort with less analgesic and/or sedative drugs consumption (9.7% vs 29%: p < 0.05) and less vomiting (3% vs 22.5%: p < 0.05). No postoperative headache was noticed in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: With the described pharmacological and technical approach, spinal anesthesia is more suitable than continuous epidural technique for cesarean section, unless contraindicated.     

Comparison of lidocaine and saline for epidural top-up during combined spinal-epidural anesthesia in volunteers

This study was designed to determine the efficacy of saline as an epidural top-up to prolong spinal anesthesia during combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA). Eight volunteers received three separate CSEAs with intrathecal lidocaine (50 mg). After two-segment regression, each subject received either a saline (10 mL), lidocaine 1.5% (10 mL), or control sham (0.5 mL saline) epidural injection in a randomized, double-blind, triple cross-over fashion. Sensory block was assessed by pinprick and tolerance to transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) equivalent to surgical stimulation at the knee and ankle. Motor strength was assessed with iso-metric force dynamometry. Data were analyzed with a repeated measures analysis of variance and a paired t-test. Sensory block to pinprick was prolonged in the thoracolumbar dermatomes only by lidocaine (P < 0.05). Neither lidocaine nor saline prolonged the duration of tolerance to TES at the tested sites. Instead, saline decreased the duration of tolerance to TES by 20 and 24 min at the knee and ankle (P < 0.05). Recovery from motor block at the quadriceps was prolonged by an epidural injection of lidocaine (P < 0.05). We conclude that when 10 mL of epidural saline is administered after two-segment regression, it is an ineffective top-up and may decrease the duration of spinal anesthesia during CSEA.     

Redistribution of sufentanil to cerebrospinal fluid and systemic circulation after epidural administration in dogs

Due to its higher lipid solubility, sufentanil may be less likely than morphine to migrate rostrally in the cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) and cause delayed respiratory depression following epidural administration. However, early respiratory depression has been reported in patients after relatively large doses of epidural sufentanil. This has been attributed to systemic drug uptake. We used a dog model to investigate the pharmacokinetics and rostral spread of epidural sufentanil in CSF. Sampling catheters were placed in the lumbar subarachnoid space, the cisterna magna, and femoral arteries of six mongrel dogs. Samples of cisternal CSF, lumbar CSF, and blood were drawn at 0, 1, 5, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 180 min after lumbar epidural sufentanil injection. We measured sufentanil concentrations by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and used the least squares method to a fit tri-exponential function to each sufentanil concentration versus time data set. Paired t-test was used to test for statistical significance. After epidural sufentanil, lumbar CSF concentrations were significantly higher than plasma or cisternal CSF sufentanil concentrations at all assessment times. Sufentanil concentrations were significantly higher in cisternal CSF than in plasma at 30 and 60 min after injection. Sufentanil appeared rapidly in lumbar CSF, reaching a maximum concentration (Cmax) of 57 ng/mL at 6.5 min. In cisternal CSF, a Cmax of 1.2 ng/mL was reached at 21 min, and Cmax in plasma was 0.35 ng/mL at 6 min. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of sufentanil in cisternal CSF was approximately six times higher than the plasma AUC (P < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

A case of systemic lupus erythematosus associated with spinal epidural hematoma

A 47 year-old Japanese female who showed transverse myelopathy (TM) due to spinal epidural hematoma diagnosed by MRI in the course of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) was reported. She was admitted to Keio University Hospital due to paraplegia, anesthesia of lower extremity, urinary disturbance. Neurological examination revealed transverse disturbance of Th 10. Lumbar spinal cord MRI showed irregular mass that located at epidural region of 9th-11th thoracic vertebrae. When the laminectomy of 9th-11th thoracic vertebrae was performed, hematoma (4.5 cm x 1.5 cm in size) was confirmed and removed completely. Post operative condition was stable and symptoms had been improving gradually. It has been reported that TM associated with SLE was closely related to myelitis. In this case, epidural hematoma was a major cause of TM and MRI was very useful for her diagnosis and treatment. This is the rare case of SLE associated with spinal epidural hematoma and was thought as a important case to consider the cause of neurological complication of SLE.     

The feasibility of epidural anesthesia without endotracheal intubation for abdominal surgery in patients with collagen diseases

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Patients with collagen diseases are generally regarded as high-risk surgical candidates. MATERIAL AND METHODS: To evaluate the feasibility of epidural anesthesia and to determine the risk factors in abdominal surgery for patients with collagen diseases, 20 patients with collagen diseases who underwent elective abdominal surgery were examined for their surgical outcomes and clinical characteristics. Among the 20 cases, 12 received epidural anesthesia alone without endotracheal intubation, 3 received general anesthesia only, 4 received general anesthesia with epidural anesthesia and one received lumbar anesthesia. RESULTS: Only one patient receiving epidural anesthesia died after operation. The mortality in patients receiving epidural anesthesia was 8.3% (1/12) while the overall mortality was 5.0% (1/20). No significant difference was observed either in the mortality or incidence of postoperative complications among the 4 groups according to the method of anesthesia. Patients with a dysfunction of the vital organs more often had postoperative complications than those without a dysfunction of the vital organs (p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: Although only a small number of patients were included in this study, these results suggested that 1) elective abdominal surgery can be as safely performed under epidural anesthesia alone as with general anesthesia even for patients with collagen diseases, and 2) the patients with collagen diseases, who preoperatively showed a dysfunction of the vital organs, might be at a higher risk for abdominal surgery.     

Effect of epidural anesthesia on airway constriction induced with methacholine or capsaicin in cats

The choice of epidural anesthesia for patients with bronchial asthma is controversial. We studied the effect of epidural anesthesia on airway constriction induced by methacholine or capsaicin in cats. Cats were anesthetized with pentobarbital and mechanically ventilated. Peak airway pressure and compliance, as well as cardiac sympathetic and vagal nerve activity were recorded. We sprayed 0.2% methacholine of 0.2% capsaicin into the trachea to produce airway constriction, and 15 min after drug spray we injected 2% lidocaine 1.0 ml into the epidural space. Methacholine increased peak airway pressure by 25% and decreased compliance by 26%. Capsaicin increased peak airway pressure 20% and decreased compliance 22%. After epidural anesthesia, cardiac sympathetic nerve activity decreased to 40% and 44%, vagal nerve activity decreased to 92% and 61% of control values in methacholine and capsaicin groups, respectively. However, here were no changes in the peak airway pressure and compliance in the two groups. These results suggest that epidural anesthesia, even if epidural anesthesia decrease sympathetic nerve activity, has no effect on the airway constriction induced with methacholine or capsaicin.     

Advantages of epidural anesthesia in patients with end-stage chronic renal failure

The authors analyze the experience gained in anesthesiological management of 667 surgeries in patients with the end-stage chronic renal failure. 206 patients were operated on under epidural anesthesia and 461 under general anesthesia. The technique of anesthesia, preparation of patients, and the management during and after surgery are described. 63 hemodialysis procedures were performed for 4 h before and 154 for 12 h after surgery. The complications occurring during and after anesthesia by both methods are analyzed. Epidural anesthesia was found to be more safe for patients with the end-stage chronic renal failure. General anesthesia more often led to hemodynamic, respiratory, metabolic disorders, and other hemostasis disturbances.     

Polypharmacy and the risk of drug-drug interactions among Danish elderly. A prescription database study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Interscalene block can be chosen for complete anesthesia for shoulder surgery. Phrenic nerve block occurs with almost all interscalene blocks, but is well tolerated in most patients. This may not be the case in selected geriatric patients. METHODS: The patient is a 90-year-old female with osteoarthritis of the left shoulder scheduled for total shoulder anthroplasty. Past medical history revealed hypertension, mild mitral valve insufficiency, and a remote episode of congestive heart failure. She underwent interscalene block with 40 mL of 1.4% mepivacaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine freshly added, alkalinized with sodium bicarbonate. RESULTS: The onset of the block was rapid and complete. The patient had minimal intravenous sedation (0.5 mg midazolam) and was resting comfortably with a respiratory rate of 12-14 breaths/min. Approximately 5 minutes after the injection of local anesthetic, the patient was noted to be alert, cyanotic, denying dyspnea, with an oxygen saturation of 75-85%. A chest radiograph revealed elevation of the ipsilateral hemidiaphragm and no pneumothorax or other pathology. Despite supplemental oxygen by face mask, desaturation persisted and general anesthesia was induced. On emergence from anesthesia, the patient had a complete interscalene block. Repeat chest radiograph after resolution of the block revealed return of hemidiaphragm position and no other pathology. The patient was extubated in the recovery room without difficulty. Following extubation the patient demonstrated stable respirations and normal oxyhemoglobin saturation. CONCLUSIONS: Ipsilateral phrenic nerve paralysis caused significant respiratory compromise in an elderly patient without known significant pulmonary disease.     

Role of 55- and 75-kDa TNF receptors in the potentiation of Fc-mediated phagocytosis in human neutrophils

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of epidural vs general anesthesia on the incidence of long-term cognitive dysfunction after total knee replacement surgery in older adults. DESIGN: Randomized controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Orthopedic specialty academic hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 262 patients undergoing elective primary total knee replacement with a median age of 69 years; 70% women. INTERVENTION: Random assignment to either epidural or general anesthesia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A thorough neuropsychological assessment was performed preoperatively and repeated at 1 week and 6 months postoperatively. Cognitive outcome was assessed by within-patient change on 10 tests of memory, psychomotor, and language skills. Prospective standardized surveillance for cardiovascular complications was performed to allow simultaneous assessment of anesthetic effects on cognitive and cardiovascular outcomes. RESULTS: The two groups were similar at baseline in terms of age, sex, comorbidity, and cognitive function. There were no significant differences between the epidural and general anesthesia groups in within-subject change from baseline on any of the 10 cognitive test results at either 1 week or 6 months. Overall, 5% of patients showed a long-term clinically significant deterioration in cognitive function. There was no difference between the anesthesia groups in the incidence of major cardiovascular complications (3% overall). CONCLUSIONS: The type of anesthesia, general or epidural, does not affect the magnitude or pattern of postoperative cognitive dysfunction or the incidence of major cardiovascular complications in older adults undergoing elective total knee replacement. This is the largest trial of the effects of general vs regional anesthesia on cerebral function reported to date, with more than 99% power to detect a clinically significant difference on any of the neuropsychological tests.