共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
Cheewasu Phuhiran Takayuki Takarada Suparin Chaiklangmuang 《International Journal of Hydrogen Energy》2014
Hydrogen gas production from eucalyptus by catalytic steam gasification was carried out in an atmospheric pressure of two-stage fixed bed. The gasifier was operated with the temperature range of 500–650 °C and steam partial pressure of 16, 30 and 45 kPa; nickel-loaded Thai brown coal char was used as a catalyst. The yields and compositions of the gasification products depend on the operating conditions, especially, the reaction temperature and the steam. The yield of H2 increased at elevated temperatures, from 26.94 to 46.68%, while that of CO dramatically decreased, from 70.21 to 37.71 mol%. The highest H2 yield, 46.68%, was obtained at the final gasifying temperature of 650 °C. Eucalyptus catalytic steam gasification indicated that the maximum H2/CO ratio reached 1.24 at the gasification temperature of 650 °C and the steam partial pressure of 30 kPa. It can be concluded that eucalyptus is appropriate for synthesis gas production from eucalyptus volatiles by catalytic steam gasification while using nickel-loaded brown coal char as a catalyst. 相似文献
2.
Xianan Xiang Guangcai Gong Chenhua Wang Ninghua Cai Xuehua Zhou Yongsuo Li 《International Journal of Hydrogen Energy》2021,46(1):221-233
The most commonly used for gasification of village-level solid waste is the fixed-bed gasifier, but there is no reasonable method to evaluate the gasification process. This paper attempts to find a gasifier that is most suitable for gasification of village-level solid wastes through exergy analysis method. Based on experimental data from literature, the exergy efficiencies and LHV(Low Heat Value) of product gas from updraft and downdraft fixed bed gasifier are studied in this paper. The results show that the updraft fixed bed gasifier has higher exergy efficiency, and the gas produced by the downdraft fixed bed gasifier has a higher heating value. Air gasification has higher exergy efficiency than steam gasification and pure oxygen gasification. The highest exergy efficiency at a gasification temperature of about 1000 °C and ER (Equivalence Ratio) value in the range of 0.33–0.36. The volatile content of gasification raw materials is higher, and the gasification efficiency is higher. Through the research of this paper, a new path to reasonably evaluate the gasification process is obtained. 相似文献
3.
4.
Stefano Piazzi Lorenzo Menin Daniele Antolini Francesco Patuzzi Marco Baratieri 《International Journal of Hydrogen Energy》2021,46(13):8972-8985
This work investigates the opportunity of retrofitting existing small-scale gasifiers shifting from combined heat and power (CHP) to hydrogen and biofuels production, using steam and biomass residues (woodchips, vineyard pruning and bark). The experiments were carried out in a batch reactor at 700 °C and 800 °C and at different steam flow (SF) rates (0.04 g/min and 0.20 g/min). The composition of the producer gas is in the range of 46–70 % H2, 9–29 % CO, 12–27 % CO2, and 2–6 % CH4. A producer gas specific production factor of approx. 10 NLpg/gchar can be achieved when the lower SFs are used, which allows to provide 80 % of the hydrogen concentration required for biomethanation and MeOH synthesis. As for FT synthesis, an optimal H2/CO ratio of approx. 2 can be achieved. The results of this work provide further evidence towards the feasibility of hydrogen and biofuels generation from residual biomass through steam gasification. 相似文献
5.
Main characteristics of gaseous yield from steam gasification have been investigated experimentally. Results of steam gasification have been compared to that of pyrolysis. The temperature range investigated were 600–1000 °C in steps of 100 °C. Results have been obtained under pyrolysis conditions at same temperatures. For steam gasification runs, steam flow rate was kept constant at 8.0 g/min. Investigated characteristics were evolution of syngas flow rate with time, hydrogen flow rate and chemical composition of syngas, energy yield and apparent thermal efficiency. Residuals from both processes were quantified and compared as well. Material destruction, hydrogen yield and energy yield is better with gasification as compared to pyrolysis. This advantage of the gasification process is attributed mainly to char gasification process. Char gasification is found to be more sensitive to the reactor temperature than pyrolysis. Pyrolysis can start at low temperatures of 400 °C; however char gasification starts at 700 °C. A partial overlap between gasification and pyrolysis exists and is presented here. This partial overlap increases with increase in temperature. As an example, at reactor temperature 800 °C this overlap represents around 27% of the char gasification process and almost 95% at reactor temperature 1000 °C. 相似文献
6.
7.
8.
Hydrogen-rich gas production from biomass air and oxygen/steam gasification in a downdraft gasifier 总被引:4,自引:0,他引:4
Pengmei Lv Zhenhong Yuan Longlong Ma Chuangzhi Wu Yong Chen Jingxu Zhu 《Renewable Energy》2007,32(13):2173-2185
Biomass gasification is an important method to obtain renewable hydrogen. However, this technology still stagnates in a laboratory scale because of its high-energy consumption. In order to get maximum hydrogen yield and decrease energy consumption, this study applies a self-heated downdraft gasifier as the reactor and uses char as the catalyst to study the characteristics of hydrogen production from biomass gasification. Air and oxygen/steam are utilized as the gasifying agents. The experimental results indicate that compared to biomass air gasification, biomass oxygen/steam gasification improves hydrogen yield depending on the volume of downdraft gasifier, and also nearly doubles the heating value of fuel gas. The maximum lower heating value of fuel gas reaches 11.11 MJ/N m3 for biomass oxygen/steam gasification. Over the ranges of operating conditions examined, the maximum hydrogen yield reaches 45.16 g H2/kg biomass. For biomass oxygen/steam gasification, the content of H2 and CO reaches 63.27–72.56%, while the content of H2 and CO gets to 52.19–63.31% for biomass air gasification. The ratio of H2/CO for biomass oxygen/steam gasification reaches 0.70–0.90, which is lower than that of biomass air gasification, 1.06–1.27. The experimental and comparison results prove that biomass oxygen/steam gasification in a downdraft gasifier is an effective, relatively low energy consumption technology for hydrogen-rich gas production. 相似文献
9.
This paper presents experimental results derived from test runs performed with a laboratory-scale updraft fixed-bed gasifier coupled to a combustion chamber to produce data for the characterisation of fixed-bed gasifier operation and to investigate the release behaviour and the conversion of fuel-bound nitrogen during gasification and subsequent staged combustion of the producer gas using softwood pellets. Spatial temperature profiles and the composition of the producer gas of the gasifier have been measured for different air flow rates. In addition, the concentrations of relevant nitrogenous gas species including tars have been measured in the producer gas and at different positions in the combustion chamber. The air flow rate has a significant influence on the composition of the producer gas and the temperature profile of the packed bed of the gasifier. Results show that during updraft fixed bed gasification almost the entire fuel-bound nitrogen is released as N bound in tars from the packed bed and is then subsequently released as HCN, NO, NH3 and N2 as a result of tar cracking during combustion. This strong N-fixation in the tars was not expected and is of great relevance concerning NOx formation during combustion of the producer gas. 相似文献
10.
Kinetics of woodchips char gasification has been examined. Steam and CO2 were used as the gasifying agents. Differences and similarities between kinetics of steam gasification and CO2 gasification have been discussed. Comparison was conducted in terms of gasification duration, evolution of reaction rate with time and/or conversion, and effect of partial pressure on reaction rate. Reactor temperature was maintained at 900 °C. Partial pressure of gasifying agents varied from 1.5 bars to 0.6 bars in intervals of 0.3 bars. Steam and CO2 flow rates were chosen so that both gasifying agents had equal amount of oxygen content. CO2 gasification lasted for about 60 min while steam gasification lasted for about 22 min. The average reaction rate for steam gasification was almost twice that of CO2. Both reaction rate curves showed a peak value at certain degree of conversion. For steam gasification, the reaction rate peak was found to be at a degree of conversion of about 0.3. However, for CO2 gasification the reaction rate peak was found to be at a conversion degree of about 0.1. Reaction rates have been fitted using the random pore model (RPM). Average structural parameter, ψ for steam gasification and CO2 gasification was determined to be 9 and 2.1, respectively. Average rate constant at 900 °C was 0.065 min−1 for steam gasification and 0.031 min−1 for CO2 gasification. Change in partial pressure of gasifying agents did not affect the reaction rate for both steam and CO2 gasification. 相似文献
11.
Liangyuan Wei Haiping YangBin Li Xintong WeiLei Chen Jingai ShaoHanping Chen 《International Journal of Hydrogen Energy》2014
The effect mechanism of calcium oxide (CaO) addition on gasification of pyrolytic volatiles as a key sub-process in the absorption-enhanced steam gasification of biomass (AESGB) for H2 production at different conditions was investigated using a two-stage fixed-bed pyrolysis–gasification system. The results indicate that CaO functions as a CO2 absorbent and a catalyst in the volatiles gasification process. CaO triggers the chemical equilibrium shift to produce more H2 and accelerates volatile cracking and gasification reactions to obtain high volatile conversion rates. Increasing the gasification temperature could improve the reaction rate of cracking and gasification of volatiles as well as the catalytic effect of CaO, which continuously increase H2 yield. When the gasification temperature exceeds 700 °C, the sharp decrease in CO2 absorption capability of CaO drastically increases the CO2 concentration and yield, which significantly decrease H2 concentration. The appropriate temperature for the absorption-enhanced gasification process should be selected between 600 °C and 700 °C in atmospheric pressure. Increasing the water injection rate (represented as the mass ratio of steam to biomass) could also improve H2 yield. The type of biomasses is closely associated with H2 yield, which is closely related to the volatile content of biomass materials. 相似文献
12.
J. Kim H. Choi J. Lim Y. Rhim D. Chun S. Kim S. Lee J. Yoo 《International Journal of Hydrogen Energy》2013
The kinetics of the coal to hydrogen conversion can be significantly enhanced by introducing catalysts. The catalysts are, however, commonly deactivated by irreversible interaction with mineral matters in coal. This work addresses hydrogen production via steam gasification of ash free coals. Following the production of ash free coals (AFCs) derived from various raw coals (brown, bituminous, and coking coal), fixed-bed steam gasification of the AFCs was performed as a function of temperature and which was compared with one another and also with that of the matching raw coals. In the absence of a catalyst, AFCs produced from different parent coals exhibited similarly low gasification reactivity, comparable to a high rank coal (coking coal) at 700 °C. As expected, the reaction became faster with increasing temperature in the range, 700–900 °C. The steam gasification of AFCs was highly activated by K2CO3 above 700 °C. It was very likely that water–gas shift reaction associated with the gasification of AFCs was also catalyzed. 相似文献
13.
This study presents the effect of particle agglomeration on syngas emission during the biomass air gasification process. Various operating conditions such as operating temperature, equivalence ratio (ER), and amount of bed materials are employed. The concentrations of H2 and CO increase along with the operating time as agglomeration begins, while CO2 decreases at the same time. However, there is no significant change in the emission concentration of CH4 during the defluidization process. The lower heating value increases while the system reaches the agglomeration/defluidization under various operating parameters. When the system reaches the agglomeration/defluidization process, the LHV value sharply increases. The results are obtained when the system reaches agglomeration/defluidization. The temperature increases while bed agglomeration occurs. A higher temperature increases the production of H2 and CO, contributing to the LHV calculation. 相似文献
14.
Siyi Luo Bo XiaoZhiquan Hu Shiming LiuXianjun Guo Maoyun He 《International Journal of Hydrogen Energy》2009
The catalytic steam gasification of biomass was carried out in a lab-scale fixed bed reactor in order to evaluate the effects of temperatures and the ratio of steam to biomass (S/B) on the gasification performance. The bed temperature was varied from 600 to 900 and the S/B from 0 to 2.80. The results show that higher temperature contributes to more hydrogen production. 相似文献
15.
16.
The aim of this work is to experimentally and numerically analyze the performance of a integrated power plant composed by a steam oxygen fluidized bed biomass gasifier fed by woods, a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) and a micro Gas Turbine (mGT). The numerical analysis is carried out by using ChemCAD software. In particular, SOFC and gasifier were modeled using proper developed Fortran subroutines interfaced to the basic software. The adopted SOFC model was already validated by the authors in previous works, while the gasifier model was here developed and validated by means of experimental activities carried out by using a bench scale gasifier. Different compounds (Benzene, Toluene, Naphthalene, Phenols) were chosen to analyze the tar evolution in the gaseous stream during the gasification process. Hot gas cleaning (based on catalytic ceramic filter candles inserted in the freeboard of the gasifier – UNIQUE concept) was adopted to remove tar and particulates from the fuel hot gas stream. Different moisture contents in the range between 10 and 30% (i.e. in a deviation of 10% around the usual wood moisture content of 20%) were numerically simulated as well as the degree of purity of the oxygen utilized in the power plant (between 25% and 95%, the rest being N2). The power requirement for pure oxygen production leads to a reduction of the electrical efficiency of the whole power plant. For this reason, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to find the optimal operation conditions in order to maximise the syngas (H2, CO) content in the produced gas, while maintaining a high overall electrical efficiency. 相似文献
17.
Yaser Khojasteh Salkuyeh Bradley A. Saville Heather L. MacLean 《International Journal of Hydrogen Energy》2018,43(20):9514-9528
The paper presents techno-economic analyses and life cycle assessments (LCA) of the two major gasification processes for producing hydrogen from biomass: fluidized bed (FB) gasification, and entrained flow (EF) gasification. Results indicate that the thermal efficiency of the EF-based option (56%, LHV) is 11% higher than that of the FB-based option (45%), and the minimum hydrogen selling price of the FB-based option is $0.3 per kg H2 lower than that of the EF-based option. When a carbon capture and liquefaction system is incorporated, the efficiencies of the EF- and FB-based processes decrease to 50% and 41%, respectively. The techno-economic analysis shows that at a biomass price of $100 per tonne, either a minimum price of $115/tonne CO2e or a minimum natural gas price of $5/GJ is required to make the minimum hydrogen selling price of biomass-based plants equivalent to that of commercial natural gas-based steam methane reforming plants. Furthermore, the LCA shows that, biomass as a carbon-neutral feedstock, negative life cycle GHG emissions are achievable in all biomass-based options. 相似文献
18.
19.
20.
Daniel Schweitzer Friedemann Georg Albrecht Max Schmid Marcel Beirow Reinhold Spörl Ralph-Uwe Dietrich Antje Seitz 《International Journal of Hydrogen Energy》2018,43(2):569-579
In the SER (sorption enhanced reforming) gasification process a nitrogen-free, high calorific product gas can be produced. In addition, due to low gasification temperatures of 600–750 °C and the use of limestone as bed material, in-situ CO2 capture is possible, leading to a hydrogen-rich and carbon-lean product gas. In this paper, results from a bubbling fluidised bed gasification model are compared to results of process demonstration tests in a 200 kWth pilot plant.Based upon that, a concept for the hydrogen production via biomass SER gasification is studied in terms of efficiency and feasibility. Capital and operational expenditures as well as hydrogen production costs are calculated in a techno-economic assessment study. Furthermore, market framework conditions are discussed under which an economic hydrogen production via SER gasification is possible. 相似文献