Reduced inspiratory effort during intermittent mandatory ventilation with PEEP

The use of intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV) and positive and expiratory pressure (PEEP) may demand the patient mount an inspiratory pressure equivalent to the pressure level of the PEEP for spontaneous breathing. During respiratory failure, ineffective inspiratory muscles may be unable to consistently meet such demands, especially if high levels of PEEP are used. A technique which reduces the required inspiratory effort was devised for use in patients being treated with IMV and PEEP. Using this technique, isovolume inspiratory time was dramatically reduced and less inspiratory effort was required. This maneuver may assist spontaneous breathing in patients with respiratory failure on high levels of PEEP.     

Pressure-controlled, inverse ratio ventilation that avoids air trapping in the adult respiratory distress syndrome

OBJECTIVES: To investigate physiologic and outcome data in patients switched from volume-cycled conventional ratio ventilation to pressure-controlled inverse ratio ventilation that did not produce air trapping and intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). SETTING: Medical intensive care unit. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of crossover data and outcome. PATIENTS: Fourteen patients with the adult respiratory distress syndrome who were receiving mechanical ventilation with volume-cycled, conventional ratio ventilation followed by pressure-controlled, inverse ratio ventilation. INTERVENTIONS: Our approach to pressure-controlled, inverse ratio ventilation was to use tidal volumes and applied PEEP values comparable to those volumes and values used on volume-cycled, conventional ratio ventilation, use inspiratory times to increase mean airway pressure instead of additional applied PEEP, and avoid air trapping (intrinsic PEEP). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: With this approach, there was a reduction in peak airway pressure from 53 +/- 8.5 (SD) to 40 +/- 5.9 cm H2O (p < .01), and an increase in mean airway pressure from 20 +/- 3.9 to 30 +/- 5.2 cm H2O (p < .01). Tidal volume, mean inflation pressure, and compliance did not change. Oxygenation (PaO2) improved from 57 +/- 11.3 torr (7.6 +/- 1.5 kPa) to 94 +/- 40.2 torr (12.5 +/- 5.4 kPa) (p = .01) but the oxygenation index (mean airway pressure x FIO2 x 100/PaO2) did not change significantly (25.9 +/- 10.3 to 27.2 +/- 12.2). There was no significant change in PaCO2 or pH even though delivered minute ventilation decreased from 17.4 +/- 4.3 to 14.8 +/- 5.8 L/min (p = .02). Cardiac index slightly decreased, but hemodynamic values were otherwise stable. Only three of the 14 study patients survived. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that oxygenation is primarily a function of mean airway pressure, and that longer inspiratory times can be used as an alternative to applied PEEP to increase this oxygenation. If no air trapping develops, lung inflation pressures and delivered volumes remain constant with this approach. Because the technique was used only in patients refractory to conventional techniques, the poor outcome is not surprising.     

Home versus intensive care pressure support devices. Experimental and clinical comparison

A bench study using an artificial lung model and a clinical study in patients were performed to evaluate six commercially available home pressure support devices. Six devices were tested in the in vitro study, including five designed for home use and one designed for use in intensive care units. Minimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) varied across home devices, from 0.5 cm H2O to 4.3 cm H2O. Work imposed during exhalation varied up to six-fold across devices. A substantial rebreathing volume has present for the three home devices with a common inspiratory and expiratory line. This rebreathing volume decreased with increasing PEEP level, as expected, but remained substantial at the widely used PEEP level of 5 cm H2O. Use of a non-rebreathing valve increased both the work imposed by the circuit during the exhalation phase and the time required to attain the relaxation equilibrium. Except for two home devices and a bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) device equipped with a non-rebreathing valve, differences in inspiratory trigger sensitivities were small between home and intensive care devices. During pressure support, the total work performed by the machines did not differ by more than 15% between devices, whereas differences of more than 300% were observed in flow acceleration. Only one home device gave a flow acceleration similar to or better than that obtained with the intensive care device. In a randomized, crossover clinical study, we compared a home device to a device specially designed for intensive care use in seven intubated patients during weaning from mechanical ventilation. The main differences between the two devices were trigger sensitivity and initial flow acceleration. For the same level of pressure support, there were no significant differences in arterial PCO2, tidal volume, respiratory rate, or minute ventilation between these two devices. However, the esophageal pressure-time product was 30% higher with the home device (165 +/- 93 versus 119 +/- 80 cm H2O/min, p < 0.05). In conclusion, differences exist between devices in terms of occurrence of rebreathing, speed of attainment of stable pressure support level, and expiratory resistance. These differences characterizing the delivery of pressure support may have clinical impact on the inspiratory effort of patients.     

Effects of different triggering systems and external PEEP on trigger capability of the ventilator

OBJECTIVE: The triggering capability of both the pressure and flow triggering systems of the Servo 300 ventilator (Siemens-Elema, Sweden) was compared at various levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), airway resistance (R(aw)), inspiratory effort and air leak, using a mechanical lung model. DESIGN: The ventilator was connected to a two bellows-in-series-type lung model with various mechanical properties. Lung compliance and chest wall compliance were 0.03 and 0.121/cmH2O, respectively. R(aw) was 5, 20 and 50 cmH2O/l/s. Respiratory rate was 15 breaths/min. To compare the triggering capability of both systems, the sensitivity of pressure and flow triggered pressure support ventilation (PSV) was adjusted to be equal by observing the triggering time at 0 cmH2O PEEP and 16 cmH2O of pressure support (PS) with no air leak. No auto-PEEP was developed. In the measurement of trigger delay, the PS level ranged from 16 to 22 cmH2O to attain a set tidal volume (V(T)) of 470 ml at a R(aw) of 5, 20 and 50 cmH2O/l/s. The PEEP level was then changed from 0, 5 and 10 cmH2O at a PS level of 17 cmH2O and R(aw) of 5 and 20 cmH2O/l/s, and the trigger delay was determined. The effect of various levels of air leak and inspiratory effort on triggering capability was also evaluated. Inspiratory effort during triggering delay was estimated by measurements of pressure differentials of airway pressure (Paw) and driving pressure in the diaphragm bellows (Pdriv) in both systems. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: There were no significant differences in trigger delay between the two triggering systems at the various PEEP and R(aw) levels. At the matched sensitivity level, air leak decreased trigger delay in both systems, and additional PEEP caused auto-cycling. A low inspiratory drive increased trigger delay in the pressure sensing system, while trigger delay was not affected in the flow sensing system. The Paw and Pdriv differentials were lower in flow triggering than in pressure triggering. CONCLUSIONS: With respect to triggering delay, the triggering capabilities of the pressure and flow sensing systems were comparable with and without PEEP and/or high airway resistance at the same sensitivity level, unless low inspiratory drive and air leak were present. In terms of pressure differentials, the flow triggering system may require less inspiratory effort to trigger the ventilator than that of the pressure triggering system with a comparable triggering time. However, this difference may be extremely small.     

The effect of positive endexpiratory pressure, peak inspiratory pressure, and inspiratory time on functional residual capacity in mechanically ventilated preterm infants

In mechanical ventilation of preterm infants, positive endexpiratory pressure (PEEP) is widely used to prevent alveolar collapse, maintain functional residual capacity (FRC) and improve oxygenation. Prolongation of inspiratory time (ti) and increase of peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) are also used for this purpose. We investigated the effect of variations of PEEP, PIP and ti on FRC in ten infants with hyaline membrane disease and onset of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD, n = 7), pulmonary hypertension (n = 1), pulmonary hypoplasia (n = 1) or severe BPD (n = 1) (gestational age 24-39 weeks, median 26 weeks; birth weight 590-2960 g, 785 g; chronological age 7 84 days, 19 days; weight 689-4650 g, 1185 g). FRC, measured using the sulphur hexafluoride washout technique, was between 6.2 and 48.3 ml/kg (median 21.5 ml/kg). PEEP was changed stepwise 2-5 times in each patient (median 3) and mean airway pressure (MAP) was modified independently of PEEP by changing PIP 0 2 times (median 1) and ti 0(2 times (median 2). Changes of FRC correlated well with modifications of PEEP in each patient (r = 0.90, range 0.71 0.99). The slope factors of linear correlations had a median value of 2.94 ml/cm H20 per kg, which was significantly different from zero (P < 0.01) and significantly higher than the slope factors of linear correlations between FRC and MAP after modifications of PIP or ti (P < 0.01). The latter two were statistically not different from zero. The quotients deltaFRC/deltaMAP were significantly higher after adjustments of PEEP than after adjustments of PIP or ti (P < 0.01). The time lag between the change of PEEP and the stabilization of FRC on a new level ranged from 2 to 14 min (median 5). CONCLUSION: FRC is mainly determined by PEEP but not by PIP or ti. Stabilization of FRC after a change of PEEP can last up to 14 min. Its duration is unpredictable and has to be waited for when testing pulmonary function in ventilated preterm infants.     

Airway pressure release ventilation

BACKGROUND: Elevated airway pressures during mechanical ventilation are associated with hemodynamic compromise and pulmonary barotrauma. We studied the cardiopulmonary effects of a pressure-limited mode of ventilation (airway pressure release ventilation) in patients with the adult respiratory distress syndrome. METHODS: Fifteen patients requiring intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) were studied. Following measurement of hemodynamic and ventilatory data, all patients were placed on airway pressure release ventilation (APRV). Cardiorespiratory measurements were repeated after a 2-hour stabilization period. RESULTS: During ventilatory support with APRV, peak inspiratory pressure (62 +/- 10 vs 30 +/- 4 cm H2O) and PEEP (11 +/- 4 vs 7 +/- 2 cm H2O) were reduced compared with IMV. Mean airway pressure was higher with APRV (18 +/- 5 vs 24 +/- 4 cm H2O). There were no statistically significant differences in gas exchange or hemodynamic variables. Both cardiac output (8.7 +/- 1.8 vs 8.4 +/- 2.0 L/min) and partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (79 +/- 9 vs 86 +/- 11 mm Hg) were essentially unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that while airway pressure release ventilation can provide similar oxygenation and ventilation at lower peak and end-expiratory pressures, this offers no hemodynamic advantages.     

Occlusion pressure in the first 100 ms of inspiration (P0.1) as an index of the possibility of decreasing respiratory support in acute respiratory failure

The need in making the process of transfer of patients to spontaneous respiration using ventilation of the lungs with inspiratory pressure support (VLIPS) after prolonged mechanical ventilation of the lungs prompted the authors to analyze the prognostic value of criteria traditionally used by the physician to cease or decrease the respiratory support (vital capacity of the lungs, peak spontaneous flow, PaO2, etc.) and the P0.1 occlusion pressure in the airways at the end of the first 100 msec of inhalation. This latter value proved to be the most sensitive (88%), specific (86%), positive (95%) and negative (67%) prognostic value in predicting the results of decrease of respiratory support under conditions of VLIPS. The P0.1 value determining the result of decrease of respiratory support in patients with parenchymatous pulmonary diseases under conditions of VLIPS is 3.8 cm H2O.     

Role of tidal volume, FRC, and end-inspiratory volume in the development of pulmonary edema following mechanical ventilation

Mechanical ventilation with high peak inspiratory pressure and large tidal volume (VT) produces permeability pulmonary edema. Whether it is mean or peak inspiratory pressure (i.e., mean or end-inspiratory volume) that is the major determinant of ventilation-induced lung injury is unsettled. Rats were ventilated with increasing tidal volumes starting from different degrees of FRC that were set by increasing end-expiratory pressure during positive-pressure ventilation. Pulmonary edema was assessed by the measurement of extravascular lung water content. The importance of permeability alterations was evaluated by measurement of dry lung weight and determination of albumin distribution space. Pulmonary edema with permeability alterations occurred regardless of the value of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), provided the increase in VT was large enough. Similarly, edema occurred even during normal VT ventilation provided the increase in PEEP was large enough. Furthermore, moderate increases in VT or PEEP that were innocuous when applied alone, produced edema when combined. The effect of PEEP was not the consequence of raised airway pressure but of the increase in FRC since similar observations were made in animals ventilated with negative inspiratory pressure. However, although permeability alterations were similar, edema was less marked in animals ventilated with PEEP than in those ventilated with zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) with the same end-inspiratory pressure. This "beneficial" effect of PEEP was probably the consequence of hemodynamic alterations. Indeed, infusion of dopamine to correct the drop in systemic arterial pressure that occurred during PEEP ventilation resulted in a significant increase in pulmonary edema. In conclusion, rather than VT or FRC value, the end-inspiratory volume is probably the main determinant of ventilation-induced edema. Hemodynamic status plays an important role in modulating the amount of edema during lung overinflation but does not fundamentally modify the characteristics of this edema which is consistently associated with major permeability alterations. These results may be relevant for ventilatory strategies during acute respiratory failure.     

A comparison of ventilation techniques in ARDS. Volume controlled vs pressure regulated volume control

OBJECTIVE: Comparison between effects of a new method of mechanical ventilation (PRVC) and Volume Controlled ventilation in the ARDS treatment. DESIGN: Prospective study from March 1995 to March 1997. PLACE: Intensive Care Unit of Sanremo Hospital. PATIENTS: Nine patients, six males and three females, average age 49.2 years, average SAPS 35.5, with moderate to severe ARDS related to various etiologies. INTERVENTIONS: Patient were first ventilated with Siemens Servo Ventilators 300 in Volume controlled. They were then ventilated with Pressure-regulated Volume Control maintaining the same ventilation parameters (TV, RR, FiO2, PEEP and I:E ratio). MEASUREMENTS: After a 60 minute stabilisation period in each method, Peak inspiratory pressure, Static Compliance, PaO2, PaCO2, AaDO2 and cardiovascular parameters were measured. RESULTS: With the PRVC ventilation an important decrease of PIP and an improvement of PaO2 and SaO2 were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Although it is not possible to draw any conclusion on morbidity and mortality in patients treated with PRVC versus VC, for gas exchange and compliance improvement and for inspiratory pressure decrease with consequent reduction of barotrauma, it may be affirm that PCRV seems to be the best ventilation methods in the ARDS treatment.     

Clinical characteristics, respiratory functional parameters, and outcome of a two-hour T-piece trial in patients weaning from mechanical ventilation

The discrepancy in results from different studies regarding outcome of weaning from mechanical ventilation may be due to several factors such as the differences in patient populations and weaning indexes used. In order to analyze the clinical characteristics and weaning indexes in patients undergoing a 2-h T-piece weaning trial and the relationship between the etiology of acute respiratory failure (ARF) and the outcome of this weaning trial, we prospectively studied 217 patients receiving mechanical ventilation who met standard weaning criteria. Successful weaning occurred in 57.6% (125 of 217) of patients: 13 of 33 (39.4%) patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), 27 of 46 (58.7%) neurologic patients, and 85 of 138 (61.6%) patients with ARF. Ventilatory support was reinstituted in 31.8% (69 of 217) patients: 20 of 33 (60.6%) of patients with COPD, four of 46 (8.7%) neurologic patients, and 45 of 138 (32.6%) patients with ARF (p < 0.001). Reintubation was required in 23 of 148 (15.5%) patients: 15 of 42 (35.7%) neurologic patients, and eight of 93 (8.6%) patients with ARF, whereas no patient with COPD was reintubated (p < 0.001). Using a discriminant analysis, the following variables were selected as the best predictors of outcome: (1) in the whole population, days of mechanical ventilation before weaning trial (DMV), frequency-to-tidal volume ratio (f/VT), maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), airway occlusion pressure (P0.1), maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), and vital capacity (VC); (2) in patients with ARF, DMV, P0.1/MIP, MIP, f/VT, and age; (3) in patients with COPD, f/VT, P0.1, P0.1/MIP, MIP, age, and DMV; (4) in neurologic patients, MIP, MEP, and f/VT.P0.1. Using these predictors, 74.6% of the whole population, 76.1% of patients with ARF, 93.9% of patients with COPD, and 73.9% of neurologic patients were accurately classified as weaning successes or failures. The highest rate of reintubation occurred in neurologic patients. In this group, the ability to cough and clear respiratory secretions, objectively reflected by MEP, may help in clinical decision-making.     

Serologic test for syphilis as a surrogate marker for human immunodeficiency virus infection among United States blood donors

OBJECTIVE: To determine the presence of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in patients affected by acute lung injury (ALI) and the adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) during mechanical ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). DESIGN: A prospective clinical study. SETTING: 10-bed general intensive care unit in a University Hospital. PATIENTS: 7 consecutive patients an age 44.7 +/- 8.6 years with a diagnosis of ALI or ARDS were studied. All were on mechanical ventilation with PEEP. INTERVENTIONS: PEEP was increased in steps of 5 cm H2O until the appearance of TR or up to a limit of 20 cm H2O. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Right atrial pressure, pulmonary artery pressure, and wedge pressure were measured and cardiac output was determined by thermodilution. TR was graded from 0 to 3. Standard 2D echocardiographic and pulsed-wave images were obtained at each level of PEEP. PEEP was increased from 4 +/- 3 to 17 +/- 2 cm H2O. Mean PAP increased from 27.7 +/- 2.9 to 36.7 +/- 3.5 mm Hg (p < 0.02) when PEEP was increased. Five patients had competent valves and two had mild TR at baseline. In six out of the seven, TR either developed or increased when PEEP was increased. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated the development of TR after the use of PEEP in patients with ALI and ARDS as a consequence of pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular overloading. Since TR may randomly affect cardiac output values and derived parameters, the assessment of cardiac performance by some techniques such as thermodilution should be used with caution.     

The influence of surveillance methods on surgical wound infection rates in a tertiary care spinal surgery service

We studied 13 consecutive infants admitted to our Neonatal Intensive Care Unit over 37 months from 1 June 1994 to 30 June 1997, who were diagnosed with severe persistent pulmonary hypertension (PPHN) meeting extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) criteria as defined by Bartlett and/or Short. They were managed with conservative ventilation strategy, with emphasis on the use of moderate ventilatory pressures whilst avoiding paralysis. Peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) on intermittent mandatory ventilation was adjusted according to adequate chest excursion. High PIP was avoided. Two main ventilatory techniques were used: 1) low ventilatory rate < or = 40/min, PIP 20 to 30 cmH2O, inspiratory time (IT) 0.5 seconds, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) 5 cmH2O, and 2) high ventilatory rate 100/min, PEEP 0 cmH2O, IT 0.3 seconds. The aim was to keep preductal PaO2 > or = 50 mmHg. We did not sought to achieve alkalotic pH or low PaCO2. When PIP requirements exceeded 30 to 35 cmH2O, the use of an alternative rescue therapy such as pulmonary vasodilator, high frequency ventilation and/or surfactant were considered. Only 1 infant died of PPHN. Low mortality due to PPHN can be achieved using this strategy. There is a need for a randomised controlled trial to compare this strategy with other alternative treatment strategies.     

Volume-controlled versus biphasic positive airway pressure ventilation in leukopenic patients with severe respiratory failure

OBJECTIVE: To study comparatively the effects of volume-controlled vs. biphasic positive airway pressure mechanical ventilation on respiratory mechanics and oxygenation in leukopenic patients with severe respiratory failure. DESIGN: Prospective, comparative study. SETTING: Medical intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Leukopenic (<1000 leukocytes/microliter) patients (n=20) after cytoreductive chemotherapy requiring mechanical ventilation for severe respiratory failure (Murray score of > 2.5). INTERVENTION: Patients were assigned in a consecutive, alternating manner to receive either volume-controlled or biphasic positive airway pressure mechanical ventilation, starting within 12 to 24 hrs after endotracheal intubation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Tidal volume, inspiratory flow, peak inspiratory and positive end-expiratory pressures, FIO2, and arterial blood gas analyses were recorded hourly for a study period of 48 hrs. Biphasic positive airway pressure ventilation was associated with a significant reduction in peak inspiratory pressure (mean differences at 24, 36, and 48 hrs: 4.4, 3.4, and 4.2 cm H2O; p = .024, .019, and .013, respectively) and positive end-expiratory pressures (mean differences at 24, 36, and 48 hrs: 1.6, 1.4, and 1.5 cm H20; p = .023, .024, and .023, respectively) at significantly lower FIO2 (mean differences at 12, 24, 36, and 48 hrs; p = .007, .015, .016, and .011, respectively). PaO2/FIO2 ratios and CO2 removal were similar under ventilatory conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Biphasic positive airway pressure ventilation offers the advantage of significantly reduced peak inspiratory and positive end-expiratory pressures at a lower FIO2 and with at least similar oxygenation and CO2 removal as achieved by volume-controlled mechanical ventilation. Our results are in line with previous reports on nonleukopenic patients and suggest that the positive effects of pressure-limited mechanical ventilation are independent of circulating white blood cells. Further studies are mandatory to demonstrate clinical benefit in this critically ill patient population.     

On the possible role of positive end-expiratory pressure ventilation in the treatment of chylothorax caused by blunt chest trauma

Recent reports on the treatment of chylothorax postulate a benefit to ventilator therapy, especially using positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). This report describes the use of mechanical ventilation with PEEP in the management of a 24-year-old male motorcyclist who sustained a ligamentous Chance fracture of the thoracic spine at the T6-7 level with bilateral traumatic chylothorax. Treatment of the chylothorax consisted of high PEEP ventilation, bilateral chest tube thoracostomies, and total parenteral nutrition. The chylothoraces resolved within 4 days of treatment and mechanical ventilation was stopped. Ventilator therapy of traumatic chylothorax and the physiologic grounds for its use are discussed. A review of the literature and experimental evidence seem to suggest that ventilator treatment of traumatic chylothoraces is effective.     

Microwave a-Dipole Transitions of CH2DOH and CHD2OH in Excited Torsional States

We have previously shown (Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1995;152:1248-1255) that in patients needing mechanical ventilation, the load imposed on the inspiratory muscles is excessive relative to their neuromuscular capacity. We have therefore hypothesized that weaning failure may occur because at the time of the trial of spontaneous breathing there is insufficient reduction of the inspiratory load. We therefore prospectively studied patients who initially had failed to wean from mechanical ventilation (F) but had successful weaning (S) on a later occasion. Compared with S, during F patients had greater intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (6. 10 +/- 2.45 versus 3.83 +/- 2.69 cm H2O), dynamic hyperinflation (327 +/- 180 versus 213 +/- 175 ml), total resistance (Rmax, 14.14 +/- 4.95 versus 11.19 +/- 4.01 cm H2O/L/s), ratio of mean to maximum inspiratory pressure (0.46 +/- 0.1 versus 0.31 +/- 0.08), tension time index (TTI, 0.162 +/- 0.032 versus 0.102 +/- 0.023) and power (315 +/- 153 versus 215 +/- 75 cm H2O x L/min), less maximum inspiratory pressure (42.3 +/- 12.7 versus 53.8 +/- 15.1 cm H2O), and a breathing pattern that was more rapid and shallow (ratio of frequency to tidal volume, f/VT 98 +/- 38 versus 62 +/- 21 breaths/min/L). To clarify on pathophysiologic grounds what determines inability to wean from mechanical ventilation, we performed multiple logistic regression analysis with the weaning outcome as the dependent variable. The TTI and the f/VT ratio were the only significant variables in the model. We conclude that the TTI and the f/VT are the major pathophysiologic determinants underlying the transition from weaning failure to weaning success.     

Influence of positive end-expiratory pressure ventilation (PEEP) on left ventricular pattern of contraction in experimental ARDS

The aim of the present study was to investigate the pattern of ventricular dynamic contraction and its relation to changes of transseptal pressure gradient during ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). For that purpose, left (LV) and right ventricular (RV) pressures as well as ventricular shortening in septal-lateral (s.l.) direction were assessed in 8 dogs (RV n = 5) exposed to experimental acute respiratory distress syndrome (eARDS) and PEEP 10 and 20 cmH2O (P10, P20). Despite maintenance of transmural central venous pressure by volume substitution, PEEP resulted in a fall of stroke index (P10 vs. eARDS: -7%, p<0.05; P20 vs. P10: -28%, p<0.05); this was accompanied by a fall of LV end-diastolic diameter (P10 vs. eARDS: -3.1%, p<0.01; P20 vs. P10: -7.4%, p<0.01). Although the transseptal LV to RV end- diastolic pressure gradient changed only minimally, there was a significant increase of paradoxic left ventricular systolic lengthening from 3.1% at eARDS to 4.5% at P10 (p<0.05 vs. eARDS) and 8.4% at P20 (p<0.05 vs. P10). Neither RV end-diastolic diameter nor s.l. shortening were significantly influenced by P10 or P20. It is concluded, that a rearrangement of LV dynamic contraction does occur during ventilation with PEEP, which is compatible with the concept of paradoxic systolic bulging of the interventricular septum towards the lumen of the right ventricle. Since this phenomenon occurred independent from changes of the end-diastolic pressure gradient between both ventricles, we suggest that systolic septal movement to the right is an active contractile process to support the function of a stressed RV.     

Comparison of alveolar ventilation, oxygenation, pressure support, and respiratory system resistance in response to noninvasive versus conventional mechanical ventilation in foals

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of positive pressure ventilation applied through a mask versus an endotracheal tube, using anesthetized/paralyzed foals as a model for foals with hypoventilation. ANIMALS: Six 1-month-old foals. PROCEDURE: A crossover design was used to compare the physiologic response of foals to 2 ventilatory techniques, noninvasive mask mechanical ventilation (NIMV) versus endotracheal mechanical ventilation (ETMV), during a single period of anesthesia and paralysis. Arterial pH, PaO2, PaCO2, oxygen saturation, end-tidal CO2 tension, airway pressures, total respiratory system resistance, resistance across the upper airways (proximal to the midtracheal region), and positive end-expiratory pressures (PEEP) were measured. Only tidal volume (VT; 10, 12.5, and 15 ml/kg of body weight) or PEEP (7 cm of H2O) varied. RESULTS: Compared with ETMV, use of NIMV at equivalent VT resulted in PaCO2 and pH values that were significantly higher, but PaO2 was only slightly lower. Between the 2 methods, peak airway pressure was similar, but peak expiratory flow was significantly lower and total respiratory resistance higher at each VT for NIMV. Delivery of PEEP (7 cm of H2O) was slightly better for ETMV (7.1 +/- 1.3 cm of H2O) than for NIMV (5.6 +/- 0.6 cm of H2O). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that use of NIMV induces similar physiologic effects as ETMV, but the nasal cavities and mask contribute greater dead space, manifesting in hypercapnia. Increasing the VT used on a per kilogram of body weight basis, or the use of pressure-cycled ventilation might reduce hypercapnia during NIMV. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Use of NIMV might be applicable in selected foals, such as those with hypoventilation and minimal changes in lung compliance, during weaning from endotracheal mechanical ventilation, or for short-term ventilation in weak foals.     

Effect of meperidine on occlusion pressure responses to hypercapnia and hypoxia with and without external inspiratory resistance

In 5 normal subjects we measured ventilation and P0.1, the pressure generated by the first 0.1 sec of inspiratory effort against a closed airway, in response to hypercapnia and hypoxia with and without added inspiratory resistance before and after oral meperidine (1.1 to 1.3 mg per kg). CO2 responses were studied in the steady state, whereas progressive hypoxia was used to elicit hypoxic responses. In general, resistance decreased ventilatory responses to hypercapnia but increased P0.1 responses to both hypoxia and hypercapnia. Meperidine depressed both ventilatory and P0.1 responses, more so in hypoxia than in hypercapnia. The combination of resistance and merperidine was additive in depressing responses to hypercapnia but in hypoxia produced little more depression than did meperidine alone. In both hypercapnia and hypoxia, meperidine decreased the augmentation of P0.1 that was associated with increased resistance. Normal subjects responded to acute increases of inspiratory resistance by increasing inspiratory motor output; this increase was distinctly blunted by meperidine.     

Fenoldopam improves renal hemodynamics impaired by positive end-expiratory pressure

BACKGROUND: Mechanical ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) can impair renal hemodynamics. Fenoldopam, a dopamine receptor agonist, has been shown, in animal experiments, to improve renal perfusion. The purpose of the current study was to examine the effects of this agent on altered renal hemodynamics secondary to positive pressure ventilation. METHODS: Twelve patients requiring mechanical ventilation of their lungs and PEEP for the treatment of hypoxemia after multiple trauma or visceral surgery were studied. Hemodynamic variables, renal vascular resistance, urine flow, creatinine, inulin and PAH clearance, and excretion of sodium and potassium (NaE and KE) were measured before and after introduction of a level of PEEP high enough to decrease urine flow rate by 25% or more, and after administration of intravenous fenoldopam. RESULTS: No hemodynamic effect resulted from 0.1 microgram.kg-1.min-1, but 0.2 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 fenoldopam decreased both diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure from 66 +/- 37 (mean +/- SEM) to 57 +/- 21 mmHg, and from 83 +/- 3 to 74 +/- 4 mmHg, respectively. Renal vascular resistance was reduced from 54 +/- 12 to 19 +/- 5 dynes.s.cm-5 at 0.2 micrograms.kg-1.min-1. Fenoldopam produced a dose-related increase in renal blood flow and PAH clearance. With 0.2 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 fenoldopam, urine flow increased from 81 +/- 25 to 116 +/- 29 ml/h, NaE from 28 +/- 7 to 85 +/- 70 microM/min, and KE from 65 +/- 12 to 109 +/- 16 microM/min. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study indicate that intravenous fenoldopam at a dose of 0.2 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 improves renal hemodynamics and increases Na and K excretion in patients requiring mechanical ventilation of their lungs and PEEP. These effects are probably caused by an increased kidney perfusion secondary to renal artery vasodilation.     

Effects of extrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure on mechanically ventilated patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and dynamic hyperinflation

OBJECTIVE: To examine the circulatory and respiratory effects of extrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPe) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and dynamic hyperinflation during controlled mechanical ventilation. DESIGN: Different levels of PEEPe were applied randomly in mechanically ventilated patients with COPD and dynamic hyperinflation. SETTING: Respiratory Intensive Care Unit of a University Hospital. PATIENTS: 9 patients with acute respiratory failure and dynamic hyperinflation due to acute exacerbation of COPD. INTERVENTIONS: PEEPe 35%, 58% and 86% of intrinsic PEEP (PEEPi) were applied. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Using flow-directed pulmonary artery catheters hemodynamic measurements were obtained, while simultaneously lung volumes, airflows and airway pressures were recorded. In order to estimate alveolar pressures (Palv), rapid airway occlusions during passive expiration were also performed. At no level of PEEPe were significant changes in cardiac output, gas exchange variables, dead space, airways inflation resistances and respiratory system static end-inspiratory compliance observed. At high level of PEEPe central venous, mean pulmonary arterial and pulmonary capillary wedge pressures were increased significantly. All but one patient were flow-limited during passive expiration. PEEPe 86% of PEEPi caused a significant increase in end-expiratory lung volume and total PEEP. Iso-volume pressure-flow curves showed volume-dependence expiratory flow limitation in 2 patients, while in 8 patients volume-dependence of critical driving pressure (Palv-mouth pressure) that decreased flows was also observed. CONCLUSIONS: The effects of PEEPe on iso-volume flow and hence on lung mechanics and hemodynamics, depend on many factors, such as airways resistances, lung volumes and airway characteristics, making the patient response to PEEPe unpredictable.