共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
Stephen O. Dean 《Journal of Fusion Energy》2006,25(1-2):35-43
Presentations from a Fusion Power Associates symposium, Fusion and Energy Policy, are summarized. The topics include an overview of U.S. Department of Energy policies, fusion strategies in Europe and Japan, plans for U.S. participation in the construction of ITER, status of construction of the National Ignition Facility and recent progress in all aspects of magnetic and inertial fusion. 相似文献
2.
Stephen O. Dean 《Journal of Fusion Energy》1999,18(1):1-11
Presentations made at recent Fusion Power Associates annual meetings are summarized. These include talks by government officials on fusion policy and presentations on topics ranging from recent scientific results to near-term, non-electric applications of fusion science and technology. 相似文献
3.
Stephen O. Dean 《Journal of Fusion Energy》1998,17(4):263-287
This report has been available previously only as Volume I of a 5-volume U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Report ERDA-76/110 (1976). It was the first comprehensive U.S fusion development plan. It treats the technical, schedular and budgetary projections for the development of fusion power using magnetic confinement. It provided the basis for the U. S. fusion facility and funding commitments during the latter half of the 1970's and is published now to archive its historical significance. 相似文献
4.
Richard E. Rowberg 《Journal of Fusion Energy》1999,18(1):29-46
This report reviews and analyzes the 42-year history of congressional deliberations over funding of the magnetic fusion research and development (R&D) program. That analysis provides the basis for an assessment about how the program might fare in the future as it proceeds in the direction of developing a long-term energy source from fusion. The assessment is presented as a series of questions that Congress may wish to address in determining the program's future. 相似文献
5.
Stephen O. Dean 《Journal of Fusion Energy》2002,21(1):1-8
Presentations that were made at a Fusion Power Associates symposium, Fusion Power: Looking to the Future, are summarized. The topics included overview and personal perspectives, status of ITER, stellarators, inertial confinement and innovative concepts. Also included is a summary of work on laser fusion at Osaka University. 相似文献
6.
Presentations from a Fusion Power Associates symposium, The Fusion Energy Option, are summarized. The topics include perspectives on fossil fuel reserves, fusion as a source for hydrogen production, status and plans for the development of inertial fusion, planning for the construction of the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor, status and promise of alternate approaches to fusion and the need for R&D now on fusion technologies. 相似文献
7.
Stephen O. Dean 《Journal of Fusion Energy》2002,21(1):9-46
This paper summarizes key news events in the development of fusion energy. Highlights include formation of a new U.S. energy policy and identification of key officials of the new Bush Administration, advances in construction of the National Ignition Facility, planning for the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor, and experimental progress on DIII-D tokamak and Z facility. 相似文献
8.
S. O. Dean 《Journal of Fusion Energy》2003,22(4):209-245
This paper summarizes key news events in the development energy. Highlights include progress in negotiations for construction of the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER), actions of the U.S. government on fusion budgets, and technical progress. 相似文献
9.
This paper summarizes key 2004 news events in the development of fusion energy. Highlights include lack of progress on negotiations to site the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER), recent scientific achievements and status of U.S. fusion budget. 相似文献
10.
Stephen O. Dean 《Journal of Fusion Energy》2003,22(1):13-49
This paper summarizes key news events in the development of fusion energy. Highlights include status of ITER negotiations, FESAC studies, NIF construction and fusion-related legislation. Also included are summaries of the 2002 fusion Snowmass meeting and other workshops. 相似文献
11.
Stephen O. Dean 《Journal of Fusion Energy》2000,19(3-4):293-301
Presentations that were made at a Fusion Power Associates symposium, Frontiers in Fusion Research, are summarized. Discussions include the science frontiers of burning plasma physics, magnetic fusion concepts, inertial fusion concepts, and fusion technology. 相似文献
12.
The 2002 Fusion Summer Study was conducted July 8–19, 2002, in Snowmass, CO, and carried out a critical assessment of major next steps in the fusion energy sciences program in both magnetic fusion energy (MFE) and inertial fusion energy (IFE). The conclusions of this study were based on analysis led by over 60 conveners working with hundreds of members of the fusion energy sciences community extending over eight months. This effort culminated in two weeks of intense discussion by over 250 U.S. and 30 foreign fusion physicists and engineers present at the 2002 Fusion Summer Study. This is the Executive Summary of the study report. Details are posted at http://web.gat.com/snowmass 相似文献
13.
Charles C. Baker 《Journal of Fusion Energy》1999,18(1):27-28
This paper summarizes remarks made at Fusion Power Associates annual meeting, July 17, 2000 in San Diego. It describes the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Fusion Enegy Sciences programs in plasma and fusion technology in support of the U. S. fusion energy sciences program. 相似文献
14.
Kathryn McCarthy Charles Baker Edward Cheng Gerald Kulcinski Grant Logan George Miley John Perkins Dave Petti John Sheffield Don Steiner Weston Stacey Lester Waganer 《Journal of Fusion Energy》2002,21(3-4):121-153
This is the final report of a panel set up by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Fusion Energy Sciences Advisory Committee (FESAC) in response to a charge letter from Dr. James Decker, Acting Director of the DOE Office of Science. In that letter, Dr. Decker asked FESAC to consider whether the Fusion Energy Sciences program should broaden its scope and activities to include non-electric applications of intermediate-term fusion devices. This report, submitted to FESAC July 31, 2003, and subsequently approved by them (Appendix B), presents FESAC's response to that charge. 相似文献
15.
Stephen O. Dean 《Journal of Fusion Energy》1998,17(3):177-182
A summary is provided of the keynote address, and other papers not otherwise published in this issue, presented at Fusion Power Associates symposium Cost-effective Steps to Fusion Power, held January 25–27, 1999 in Marina del Rey, CA. 相似文献
16.
Samuel D. Harkness Charles C. Baker Mohamed A. Abdou John W. Davis William Hogan Gerald L. Kulcinski Michael Mauel Carl McHargue Robert Odette David A. Petti Paul Shewmon Stewart J. Zweben 《Journal of Fusion Energy》2000,19(1):45-64
This report presents the results and recommendations of the deliberations of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Fusion Energy Sciences Advisory Committee Panel on the Review of the Fusion Materials Research Program carried out during 1998. Metrics evaluated included evidence of recognition, publications per worker, new people attracted to the work and significance of recent accomplishments. 相似文献
17.
William. M. Nevins Michael Brown Vincent Chan Todd Ditmire Daniel D'Ippolito Daniel Dubin Martin Greenwald Alan Glasser William Kruer Michael Mauel Martha Redi Robert Rosner Carl Sovinec Edward Synakowski Richard Wolf 《Journal of Fusion Energy》2003,22(2):127-138
This is the final report of a Committee of Visitors (COV) set up by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Fusion Energy Sciences Advisory Committee (FESAC) in response to a charge letter from DOE Office of Science Director Raymond Orbach (Appendix A). In that letter, Dr. Orbach asked FESAC to assess matters pertaining to program decisions for the DOE's fusion theory and computation programs. This report, submitted to FESAC on March 29, 2004, and subsequently approved by them (Appendix B), presents FESACs response to that charge. 相似文献
18.
Robert Goldston Mohamed Abdou Charles Baker Michael Campbell Vincent Chan Stephen Dean Amanda Hubbard Robert Iotti Thomas Jarboe John Lindl B. Grant Logan Kathryn McCarthy Farrokh Najmabadi Craig Olson Stewart Prager Ned Sauthoff John Sethian John Sheffield Steven Zinkle 《Journal of Fusion Energy》2002,21(2):61-111
This is the final report of a panel set up by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Fusion Energy Sciences Advisory Committee (FESAC) in response to a charge letter dated September 10, 2002 from Dr. Ray Orbach, Director of the DOE's Office of Science. In that letter, Dr. Orbach asked FESAC to develop a plan with the end goal of the start of operation of a demonstration power plant in approximately 35 years. This report, submitted March 5, 2003, presents such a plan, leading to commercial application of fusion energy by mid-century. The plan is derived from the necessary features of a demonstration fusion power plant and from the time scale defined by President Bush. It identifies critical milestones, key decision points, needed major facilities and required budgets. The report also responds to a request from DOE to FESAC to describe what new or upgraded fusion facilities will best serve our purposes over a time frame of the next twenty years. 相似文献
19.
George H. Neilson Jr. Benjamin A. Carreras Daniel A. D'Ippolito Otto Gruber Mitsuru Kikuchi Kevin McGuire Douglass E. Post James D. Callen Patrick H. Diamond Kenneth W. Gentle E. Bickford Hooper Earl S. Marmar Cynthia Kieras Phillips Tony S. Taylor 《Journal of Fusion Energy》1999,18(3):117-160
This is the May 1996 report of a subpanel of the US Department of Energy Fusion Energy Sciences Advisory Committee (FESAC), charged with conducting a review of the progress, priorities and potential near-term contributions of TFTR, DIII-D and Alcator C-MOD (and other facilities as appropriate) as part of the transition to a Fusion Energy Sciences Program and produce an optimum plan for obtaining the most scientific benefit from them. 相似文献
20.
Charles Baker Ronald Davidson Stephen Dean Jeffrey Freidberg John Sheffield 《Journal of Fusion Energy》1999,18(2):65-83
This report presents the results and recommendations of the deliberations of the DOE Fusion Energy Sciences Advisory Committee (FESAC) Panel on Priorities and Balance, which met in Knoxville, TN, 18–21 August 1999. The Panel identified the achievement of a more integrated national program in magnetic fusion energy (MFE) and inertial fusion energy (IFE) as a major programmatic and policy goal for the years ahead. 相似文献