Fatigue Crack Growth in Epoxy/Aluminum and Epoxy/Steel Joints

The fatigue crack growth rate within epoxy/aluminum and epoxy/steel joints was evaluated as a function of a) type of surface pretreatment, b) water soak, c) fatigue cycle rate (Hz), d) adhesive thickness and e) type of epoxy adhesive.

For both adherends, aluminum and steel, a significant improvement in the fatigue behavior was obtained by use of a mercaptoester coupling agent. After an 8-day, 57°C water soak, the metal surfaces which were pretreated with coupling agent (CA) or by phosphoric acid anodization (PAA) still resulted in cohesive failure, while the controls had higher crack growth rate and showed greater scatter. The room-temperature cure matrix with CA-treated aluminum showed a less dramatic improvement, probably because of a known difference in the application procedure. For the steel joints and room-temperature adhesive the improvement in the fatigue behavior of CA-treated samples was maintained after the 8-day hot water soak. No significant change was found in the fatigue crack growth rate over a frequency range of 1 to 5 Hz, but a significant change was found as a function of the bondline thickness. The room temperature curing adhesive evaluated herein exhibited a much lower fatigue resistance than a heat-cured commercial structural adhesive FM-73.     

Predicting the Fatigue Life of Adhesively-Bonded Joints

The fatigue behaviour of adhesively-bonded joints, which consisted of an epoxy-film adhesive bonding fibre-composite substrates, has been studied. Using a double-cantilever beam specimen, the rate of crack growth per cycle has been measured as a function of the maximum strain-energy release rate, G_max. These data have then been modelled, and used to predict the fatigue lifetime of bonded single-lap joints. The agreement between the theoretical predictions and experimental results for the fatigue behaviour of the single-lap joints was found to be excellent.     

Experimental Investigation of Aluminum/Epoxy Interfacial Properties in Shear and Tension

This paper presents the results of comprehensive testing to characterize the effect of several different surface treatments on shear and tensile bond strength between 7075-T6 aluminum and two epoxy systems: EPON 815/V40 and EPON 828/Z. A rod pull-out test was used to determine interfacial shear strength, modeled after similar tests on reinforced concrete. The tensile bond strength was characterized using a tension test fixture designed in this study. Overall, the interfacial shear strengths were higher than the tension strengths. Surface knurling gave the highest interfacial shear strength, representing a 72% increase over untreated specimens. Phosphoric acid anodization (PAA) was also quite effective in shear. In tension, the highest strength was obtained from specimens treated with the PAA process along with a silane coupling agent. These specimens showed an increase in interfacial tensile strength by a factor of 5.6.     

Time Dependent Crack Growth and Loading Rate Effects on Interfacial and Cohesive Fracture of Adhesive Joints

Double cantilever beam fracture specimens were used to investigate rate dependent failures of model epoxy/steel adhesively bonded systems. Quasi-static tests exhibited time dependent crack growth and the maximum fracture energies consistently decreased with debond length for constant crosshead rate loading. It was also possible to cause debonding to switch between interfacial and cohesive failure modes by simply altering the loading rate. These rate dependent observations were characterized using the concepts of fracture mechanics. The time rate of change of the strain energy release rate, dG/dt, is introduced to model and predict failure properties of different adhesive systems over a range of testing rates. An emphasis is placed on the interfacial failure process and how rate dependent interfacial properties can lead to cohesive failures in the same adhesive system. Specific applications of the resulting model are presented and found to be in good agreement when compared with the experimental data. Finally, a failure envelope is identified which may be useful in predicting whether failures will be interfacial or cohesive depending on the rate of testing for the model adhesive systems.