TREATMENT OF THERMOPLASTIC RUBBERWITH CHLORINE BLEACH AS AN ALTERNATIVE HALOGENATION TREATMENT IN THE FOOTWEAR INDUSTRY

Avoidance of solvents in bonding operations is a current demand in the footwear industry. Halogenation of rubber soles with solutions of trichloroisocyanuric acid (TCI) in different solvents has been successfully used to improve bonding to the leather uppers. In this study, the use of chlorine bleach as an alternative water surface treatment for a rubber has been tested. A thermoplastic block styrene thermoplastic (TR) was treated with bleach to improve its adhesion to a water-based polyurethane dispersion adhesive (PUD). T-peel testing, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), contact angle measurements (ethanediol, 25°C), and infrared spectroscopy (ATR-IR) were used to analyze the modifications produced on the rubber surface. Adhesion values were obtained from T-peel testing of joints produced with similarly treated TR rubber test pieces. Different experimental variables were considered in this study, namely the immersion time (0.5-2 min) in bleach, the active chlorine content (43.9- 55.6 g/l) in the bleach, the addition of a wetting agent (1-octyl-2-pyrrolidone) to the bleach, and the application of the surface treatment using an ultrasonic bath. The treatment with bleach produced the chlorination of the hydrocarbon chains on the TR rubber surface and slightly changed the surface roughness. Chlorination of the TR rubber with bleach (free active chlorine=55.6 g/l) was fast and needed only 30 sec immersion in the reagent mixture to produce high adhesion. Furthermore, the active chlorine content in the bleach was critical to assure an adequate T-peel strength value. The addition of 1-octyl-2-pyrrolidone to the bleach increased the wettability of the rubber surface, although it was necessary to carry out the surface treatment in the ultrasonic bath to obtain adequate adhesion to the PUD adhesive.

Thermoplastic styrene-butadiene rubber Water-based polyurethane adhesive Bleach Halogenation Water-based surface treatment Contact angle ATR-IR spectroscopy SEM T-peel strength     

A new water-based chemical treatment based on sodium dichloroisocyanurate (DCI) for rubber soles in the footwear industry

A new water-based chemical treatment based on sodium dichloroisocyanurate (DCI) solutions for rubber soles of different natures is reported in this study. Different concentrations (1-5 wt%) of DCI and two rubber formulations (vulcanized styrene-butadiene rubber, R2; thermoplastic rubber, TR) were considered. The effects produced by treatment of the rubber soles with DCI were compared with the standard halogenation method using trichloroisocyanuric acid (TCI) solutions in an organic solvent (ethyl acetate). The effects of chlorination on the rubber surfaces were studied using contact angle measurements, ATR-IR spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. The adhesion strength was obtained from T-peel strength tests on canvas/PUD adhesive/treated rubber joints. The adhesive used throughout this study was a water-based polyurethane dispersion (PUD). The surface treatment with aqueous DCI solutions modified the surface chemistry of both the TR and R2 rubbers, creating C—Cl moieties on the surface and removing the zinc stearate from the R2 rubber surface. The use of a low DCI concentration in water was less effective in modifying the TR rubber, but was sufficient to obtain good T-peel strength values for the R2 rubber joints. On the other hand, heterogeneities and cracks were created on the rubber surface (mainly on the R2 rubber surface), which may contribute to an increase in the mechanical interlocking with the adhesive. A noticeable increase in the T-peel strength and a cohesive failure in the rubber for the joints produced with TR rubber were obtained when the rubber was treated with aqueous DCI solutions. For the canvas/PUD adhesive/chlorinated R2 rubber joint, the failure was located in a thin surface layer on the canvas. Finally, the surface treatment with TCI in ethyl acetate produced a more significant surface modification on both the TR and the R2 rubber, creating deeper roughness on the R2 rubber surface. Consequently, higher peel strength values were obtained using TCI solutions in ethyl acetate. Furthermore, the T-peel strength values were high in all joints produced with TR rubber treated with either TCI solution in ethyl acetate or aqueous DCI solution.     

Water-based chlorination treatment of SBS rubber soles to improve their adhesion to waterborne polyurethane adhesives in the footwear industry

Solutions of trichloroisocyanuric acid (TCI) in different organic solvents are commonly employed in the footwear industry to improve the adhesion of SBS (styrene-butadiene-styrene) rubber soles to polyurethane adhesive. To avoid the use of organic solvents in the chlorinating solutions, several water-based chlorinating treatments were investigated in this study: (i) inorganic chlorine compounds (HCl-acidified sodium hypochlorite solution; free active chlorine (FAC) = 47.8 g/l); (ii) organic chlorine donors (aqueous solution of 3 wt% TCI/H₂O, and ethanol solutions of 3 wt% HD (1,3-dichloro-5,5-dimethylhydantoine), or NCS (N-chlorosuccinimide); (iii) organic chlorine donor salts (aqueous solutions containing 3 wt% DCI (sodium dichloro isocyanurate), CB (chloramine B, N-chloro-sodium-phenylsulphenamide), or CT (chloramine T, N-chloro-sodium-p-toluenesulphenamide). The surface modifications produced by treatment of SBS rubber with the aqueous chlorinating agents were compared with those obtained by using the current solvent-based chlorinating treatment (3 wt% TCI/MEK). The FAC concentration and the chlorine stability in the solutions were determined by iodine titration, and the SBS rubber surface pH was determined with a flat pH probe. The surface modifications on the SBS rubber were analyzed by ATR-IR spectroscopy, XPS, contact-angle measurements and SEM. The adhesion properties were evaluated by T-peel strength tests on treated SBS rubber/waterborne polyurethane adhesive/roughened leather joints. The failed surfaces obtained after peel tests were analyzed by ATR-IR spectroscopy to precisely assess the locus of failure of the adhesive joints. The nature of the modifications produced on the SBS rubber surface depended on the chlorinating system used, the SBS rubber surface pH value, and the free active chlorine concentration of the chlorinating solution. The most effective chlorinating agents were TCI/H₂O and HD/EtOH, but they were not stable over time due to quick chlorine evolution. Treatment with NaClO/HCl and DCI/H₂O provided acceptable adhesive strength values although there was fast chlorine evolution in the NaClO/HCl solution; the free active chlorine concentration in the DCI/H₂O solution was stable for at least 4 days after preparation. Finally, the treatment with NCS/EtOH, CB/H₂O and CT/H₂O did not chemically modify the SBS rubber surface, so the adhesion to polyurethane adhesive was not improved.     

Ultrasonic cleaning of SBR rubber to improve the performance of subsequent plasma torch treatment

Paraffin wax and other moieties in sulfur vulcanized styrene-butadiene rubber formulations may migrate to the surface, reducing the adhesive strength in joints produced with polyurethane adhesive. In this study, with the aim to remove paraffin wax and other anti-adhesion moieties on the rubber surface to improve adhesion, prior to plasma torch treatment, a methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) cleaning in an ultrasonic bath has been carried out. The surface modifications produced on the rubber surface have been analyzed by contact angle measurements, ATR-IR spectroscopy, XPS and SEM. The adhesion properties have been evaluated by T-peel strength of treated rubber/polyurethane adhesive joints. Ultrasonic cleaning in MEK resulted in partial removal of paraffin wax on the rubber surface and, thus, lower contact angle values, decreased relative intensity of the infrared bands due to hydrocarbon moieties and lower percentage of carbon assessed from XPS spectroscopy were obtained. The ultrasonic cleaning in MEK of the rubber increased the effectiveness of the atmospheric pressure plasma torch treatment, and surface oxidation was produced. However, the oxidation degree decreased with time after plasma torch treatment, likely due to ageing of the surface treated rubber.     

Influence of Additives in Adhesion of UV Radiation Surface-Treated SBS Rubber

In this study, the effect of additives (oils, lubricants) included in the formulations of different block styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS) rubbers on the effectiveness of the ultraviolet (UV) radiation treatment to improve adhesion to polyurethane adhesive was analyzed. The modifications on the UV-treated rubber surfaces for different lengths of treatment have been characterized by contact-angle measurements (ethylene glycol, 25°C), Attenuated Total Reflectance-Infrared (ATR-IR) spectroscopy, X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS), and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). The adhesion properties have been evaluated from T-peel strengths of treated rubber/polyurethane adhesive/leather joints. The UV-radiation treatment on all rubber surfaces produced an increase in wettability, carbon-oxygen polar moieties, and ablation. The oxidation degree produced on the rubber surface treated with UV radiation was less when oils and lubricants were included in the formulation, likely due to competition of the oxidation process with the migration of low-molecular-weight additives to the rubber surface. On the SBS2 rubber surface (rubber containing carbon black and calcium carbonate fillers), the migration of oils and lubricants was also produced during the UV-radiation treatment, but a decrease in adhesion occured likely due to the lower tensile strength and higher extent of oxidation produced by the UV radiation treatment.     

Influence of Additives in Adhesion of UV Radiation Surface-Treated SBS Rubber

In this study, the effect of additives (oils, lubricants) included in the formulations of different block styrene–butadiene–styrene (SBS) rubbers on the effectiveness of the ultraviolet (UV) radiation treatment to improve adhesion to polyurethane adhesive was analyzed. The modifications on the UV-treated rubber surfaces for different lengths of treatment have been characterized by contact-angle measurements (ethylene glycol, 25°C), Attenuated Total Reflectance-Infrared (ATR-IR) spectroscopy, X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS), and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). The adhesion properties have been evaluated from T-peel strengths of treated rubber/polyurethane adhesive/leather joints. The UV-radiation treatment on all rubber surfaces produced an increase in wettability, carbon–oxygen polar moieties, and ablation. The oxidation degree produced on the rubber surface treated with UV radiation was less when oils and lubricants were included in the formulation, likely due to competition of the oxidation process with the migration of low-molecular-weight additives to the rubber surface. On the SBS2 rubber surface (rubber containing carbon black and calcium carbonate fillers), the migration of oils and lubricants was also produced during the UV-radiation treatment, but a decrease in adhesion occured likely due to the lower tensile strength and higher extent of oxidation produced by the UV radiation treatment.     

Weak boundary layers on vulcanized styrene–butadiene rubber treated with sulfuric acid

A synthetic vulcanized styrene-butadiene rubber (R2) was used in this study. The presence of paraffin wax and zinc stearate in the rubber composition prevented the adhesion of R2 rubber to solvent-based polyester-urethane adhesive. To increase the adhesion properties of R2 rubber, a surface treatment with sulfuric acid (cyclization) was applied, and the length of the immersion in sulfuric acid and the time between the immersion time and the neutralization were varied. The treated R2 rubber surfaces were characterized using ATR-IR spectroscopy, contact angle measurements (water, ethanediol), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The mechanical properties of the treated rubber were obtained from stress-strain experiments. The joint strength was obtained from the T-peel test on treated R2 rubber/polyurethane adhesive joints. Due to the penetration of the sulfuric acid into the R2 rubber bulk, the mechanical properties decreased. The treatment with sulfuric acid produced several chemical modifications on the rubber surface: sulfonation of the butadiene and the creation of C C and C O bonds. Furthermore, the surface treatment of the R2 rubber with sulfuric acid removes paraffin wax from the rubber surface, which had a beneficial effect on adhesion to the polyurethane adhesive. To remove the wax layer, the surface was wiped with petroleum ether solvent after treating the R2 rubber with sulfuric acid. However, in some experiments a progressive migration of wax from the R2 rubber bulk to the surface with time happened. The migration of wax was prevented by increasing the immersion time in H₂SO₄ by more than 5 min.     

UV treatment of synthetic styrene-butadiene-styrene rubber

The effectiveness of the treatment with ultraviolet light (UV) on several polymeric surfaces has previously been established. In this study, a low pressure mercury vapour lamp was used as a source of UV radiation for the surface treatment of a difficult-to-bond block styrenebutadiene-styrene rubber (S6), the treatment time ranging from 10 s to 30 min. The UV-treated S6 rubber surfaces were characterized by contact angle measurements (ethylene glycol, 25°C), ATR-IR spectroscopy, XPS, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), and Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM). T-peel tests on UV-treated S6 rubber/polyurethane (PU) adhesive/ leather joints (before and after ageing) were carried out to quantify adhesion strengths. The UV treatment of S6 rubber produced improved wettability, the formation of C—O, C=O and COO^- moieties, and ablation (removal of a thin rubber layer from the surface). The extent of these modifications increased with increasing treatment time. The extended UV treatment produced greater surface modifications, as well as the incorporation of nitrogen moieties at the surface. Furthermore, noticeable ablation of S6 rubber surface occurred. Peel strength values increased with increased treatment time of UV treatment of S6 rubber. Also, with increasing treatment time, the adhesive joints showed different loci of failure: adhesional failure for the as-received and 2 min-UV treated S6 rubber/polyurethane adhesive/leather joints changed to mixed failure (cohesive in the treated S6 rubber + adhesional failure) for the 30 min-UV treated S6 rubber/polyurethane adhesive/leather joint.     

Influence of the Chemical Structure of Urethane-Based Thickeners on the Properties of Waterborne Polyurethane Adhesives

To analyse the parameters that influence the thickening mechanism of waterborne polyurethane adhesives, different hydrophobically modified ethoxylated polyurethane based thickeners (HEUR) were used. The thickeners were characterized by proton nuclear magnetic resonance (¹H-NMR) and gel permeation chromatography (GPC). The thickened adhesive solutions were characterized by flow rheology, pH, particle size measurements, solids content, and confocal microscopy. The thickened solid adhesive films were characterized by ATR-IR spectroscopy, parallel plate rheology, dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The adhesion was measured by a T-peel test of leather/polyurethane adhesive/SBR rubber joints. The addition of the different HEUR thickeners increased the viscosity of the polyurethane dispersion to different degrees. Furthermore, whereas the un-thickened polyurethane dispersion showed a Newtonian rheological behaviour, a shear-thinning rheological behaviour was observed in the thickened dispersions due to thickener-thickener and polyurethane-thickener interactions. The viscosity of the thickened polyurethane adhesive solutions increased with the degree of hydrophobicity and the molecular weight of the thickener. The addition of different thickeners increased the pH values due to the ionic adsorption, which is one of the interactions that contribute to the thickening mechanism of the polyurethane thickeners, besides hydrogen bonding and van der Waals hydrophobic interactions (micelles). The entanglement of the thickened polyurethane adhesives was studied by confocal microscopy. Although the addition of the thickeners did not affect the thermal properties of the polyurethanes, the T-peel strength of leather/adhesive/SBR rubber joints was influenced by the rheological properties of the thickened adhesives.     

UV-Ozone Surface Treatment of SBS Rubbers Containing Fillers: Influence of the Filler Nature on the Extent of Surface Modification and Adhesion

SBS rubbers containing different loadings of calcium carbonate and/or silica fillers were surface treated with UV-ozone to improve their adhesion to polyurethane adhesive. The surface modifications produced on the treated filled SBS rubbers have been analyzed by contact angle measurements, ATR-IR spectroscopy, XPS and SEM. The adhesion properties have been evaluated by T-peel strength tests on treated filled SBS rubber/polyurethane adhesive/leather joints. The UV-ozone treatment improved the wettability of all rubber surfaces, and chemical (oxidation) and morphological modifications (roughness, ablation, surface melting) were produced. The increase in the time of UV-ozone treatment to 30 min led to surface cleaning (removal of silicon-based moieties) due to ablation and/or melting of rubber layers and also incorporation of more oxidized moieties was produced. Although chemical modifications were produced earlier in an unfilled rubber for short time of treatment with UV-ozone, they were more noticeable in filled rubbers for extended length of treatment, mainly for S6S and S6T rubbers containing silica filler. The oxidation process seemed to be inhibited for S6C and S6T rubbers (containing calcium carbonate filler). On the other hand, the S6S rubber containing silica filler and the lowest filler loading showed the higher extent of modification as a consequence of the UV-ozone treatment. The UV-ozone increased the joint strength in all joints, more noticeably in the rubbers containing silica filler, in agreement with the greater extents of chemical and morphological modifications produced by the treatment in these rubbers. Finally, the nature and content of fillers determined the extent of surface modification and adhesion of SBS rubber treated with UV-ozone.     

Chlorination of vulcanized styrene-butadiene rubber using solutions of trichloroisocyanuric acid in different solvents

The chlorination of vulcanized styrene-butadiene rubbers (SBRs) with trichloroisocyanuric acid (TCI) has been studied. The solvent used to apply the TCI chlorinating solutions on the rubber plays an important role in the effectiveness of the treatment since the solvent determined the degree of penetration of TCI into the rubber and also different chlorinating species were produced depending on the nature of the solvent. Surface modifications produced on a synthetic sulfur-vulcanized SBR using TCI solutions in ethyl acetate (EA), methyl ethyl ketone (MEK), and EA + MEK mixtures have been compared. Furthermore, the effects of a solvent wipe with EA or MEK prior to the chlorination process were also considered. Surface modifications produced by the treatments were analyzed using ATR-IR spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Adhesion was obtained from the T-peel strength of treated rubber/polyurethane adhesive joints. TCI/MEK solutions produced a higher degree of surface modification than TCI/EA solutions, but TCI/EA solutions were more effective in removing zinc stearate from the rubber surface. When high TCI percentages (5-7 wt%) in EA solutions were used, a weak boundary layer (WBL) was created on the rubber surface as a consequence of the deposition of an excess of chlorinating agent on the rubber surface and of by-products (cyanuric and/or isocyanuric acid). The formation of the WBL led to a lack of adhesion in the rubber towards the polyurethane adhesive. When MEK was used as a solvent for TCI, this WBL was not produced on the rubber surface, and thus adhesion was considerably higher even when high concentrations of TCI/MEK were used. Similar effects were produced using EA + MEK mixtures as the solvent for TCI. The wiping of the rubber surface with MEK prior to the chlorination treatment led to good adhesion, irrespective of the percentage of TCI and the solvent used in the chlorinating solution.     

IMPROVED PEEL STRENGTH IN VULCANIZED SBR RUBBER ROUGHENED BEFORE CHLORINATION WITH TRICHLOROISOCYANURIC ACID

The effectiveness of chlorination as surface treatment to improve the adhesion of synthetic vulcanized styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR) depends on several experimental variables. Solutions of trichloroisocyanuric acid (TCI) in methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) have been used as effective chlorination agents for several rubbers. In this study, the influence of roughening prior to chlorination treatment of a SBR rubber (R2) and the durability of the modifications produced as the time after chlorination increased have been considered. Two concentrations of the chlorination agent (0.5 and 2 wt% TCI/MEK) have been used and the chlorination treatment was applied on the R2 rubber surface using a brush. Characterization of the treated surfaces was carried out using contact angle measurements, ATR-IR spectroscopy and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). T-peel tests of treated R2 rubber/polyurethane adhesive joints have been carried out to determine the adhesion properties. Roughening was an effective treatment to remove paraffin waxes (antiadherent moieties) from the R2 rubber surface. When the chlorination is produced on the roughened R2 rubber, more noticeable chemical and morphological modifications were produced, and higher adhesion was obtained. On the other hand, TCI particles appeared on the roughened and unroughened chlorinated R2 rubber surface, and the size of these TCI particles were decreased by increasing the time after treatment. Furthermore, similar peel strength values were obtained for time after halogenation higher than 2 hours; for shorter time, a decrease in peel strength was found by increasing the time, due to the migration of paraffin wax to the rubber surface.     

Chlorination of SBS rubbers with different styrene contents using trichloro-isocyanuric acid

In order to improve their adhesion to polyurethane adhesives, three unvulcanized block styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS) rubbers with styrene contents between 33% and 55% were surface-treated with solutions of 2 wt% trichloro-isocyanuric acid (TCI) in ethyl acetate. The joint strength was estimated using T-peel tests and the failed surfaces were analyzed to assess the locus of failure. The failed surfaces were analyzed using ATR-IR spectroscopy, contact angle measurements, XPS, and SEM. An unexpected trend in the joint strength was obtained because the locus of failure depended on both the styrene content and the mechanical properties of each SBS rubber. A mixed mode of failure was obtained in joints produced with S 1 rubber (33 wt% styrene content), whereas failure in the chlorinated layer was observed with S3 rubber (55 wt% styrene content); cohesive failure in the adhesive was found for the joints produced with S2 rubber (44 wt% styrene content).     

Improved peel strength in vulcanized sbr rubber roughened before chlorination with trichloroisocyanuric acid

The effectiveness of chlorination as surface treatment to improve the adhesion of synthetic vulcanized styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR) depends on several experimental variables. Solutions of trichloroisocyanuric acid (TCI) in methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) have been used as effective chlorination agents for several rubbers. In this study, the influence of roughening prior to chlorination treatment of a SBR rubber (R2) and the durability of the modifications produced as the time after chlorination increased have been considered. Two concentrations of the chlorination agent (0.5 and 2 wt% TCI/MEK) have been used and the chlorination treatment was applied on the R2 rubber surface using a brush. Characterization of the treated surfaces was carried out using contact angle measurements, ATR-IR spectroscopy and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). T-peel tests of treated R2 rubber/polyurethane adhesive joints have been carried out to determine the adhesion properties. Roughening was an effective treatment to remove paraffin waxes (antiadherent moieties) from the R2 rubber surface. When the chlorination is produced on the roughened R2 rubber, more noticeable chemical and morphological modifications were produced, and higher adhesion was obtained. On the other hand, TCI particles appeared on the roughened and unroughened chlorinated R2 rubber surface, and the size of these TCI particles were decreased by increasing the time after treatment. Furthermore, similar peel strength values were obtained for time after halogenation higher than 2 hours; for shorter time, a decrease in peel strength was found by increasing the time, due to the migration of paraffin wax to the rubber surface.     

Chlorination of vulcanized SBR rubber by immersion or brushing in TCI solutions

The effectiveness of the chlorination treatment of synthetic vulcanized styrene-butadiene rubbers is determined by several experimental variables. In this study, trichloroisocyanuric acid (TCI) solutions in butanone have been used as chlorinating agents for a difficult-to-bond vulcanized styrene-butadiene rubber (R2). The influence of the TCI concentration (0.5 and 2 wt% TCI/MEK) was studied and a comparison between the immersion and brushing procedures to apply the chlorinating agent has been carried out. Characterization of the chlorinated surfaces was carried out using contact angle measurements (water, 25°C), ATR-IR spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). T-peel tests on similarly treated R2 rubber/polyurethane adhesive joints were carried out to quantify adhesion. The chlorination by immersion of R2 rubber with TCI/MEK solutions was less effective than using a brush. The effects of the chlorination were similar using both procedures (creation of roughness, improved wettability, C Cl moieties formation and deposition of TCI particles), but the extent of the modifications was more marked when using a brush. The higher concentration of chlorinating agent allows a higher degree of chlorination. Peel strength values were lower for brush-chlorinated R2 rubber because the migration of wax (which created a weak layer on the rubber surface) from the bulk to the R2 rubber surface was favoured. However, the presence of waxes on the R2 rubber surface still allowed a reasonable level of adhesion due to the predominance of polar moieties.     

Influence of Chlorinating Solution Concentration on the Interactions Produced Between Chlorinated Thermoplastic Rubber and Polyurethane Adhesive at the Interface

Chlorination of a thermoplastic styrene-butadiene-styrene rubber (S0) with different amounts of trichloroisocyanuric acid (TCI) solutions in ethyl acetate improved its adhesion to polyurethane adhesives. A strong interaction of the PU (polyurethane) adhesive and the chlorinated S0 rubber chains is produced at the interface. The increase in the concentration of TCI from 0.5 wt% up to 2-7 wt% resulted in the deposition of crystallites of unreacted TCI on the rubber surface. The remaining TCI on the rubber surface migrates through the PU adhesive producing some chlorination of the PU chains. The failure of the joint is located in this interface composed of both chlorinated S0 rubber and partially-chlorinated PU adhesive.     

Influence of Chlorinating Solution Concentration on the Interactions Produced Between Chlorinated Thermoplastic Rubber and Polyurethane Adhesive at the Interface

Chlorination of a thermoplastic styrene-butadiene-styrene rubber (S0) with different amounts of trichloroisocyanuric acid (TCI) solutions in ethyl acetate improved its adhesion to polyurethane adhesives. A strong interaction of the PU (polyurethane) adhesive and the chlorinated S0 rubber chains is produced at the interface. The increase in the concentration of TCI from 0.5 wt% up to 2-7 wt% resulted in the deposition of crystallites of unreacted TCI on the rubber surface. The remaining TCI on the rubber surface migrates through the PU adhesive producing some chlorination of the PU chains. The failure of the joint is located in this interface composed of both chlorinated S0 rubber and partially-chlorinated PU adhesive.     

Halogenation of styrene-butadiene rubber to improve its adhesion to polyurethanes

Halogenation of styrene-butadiene rubbers has been carried out using solutions containing different amounts (0.1-5 wt%) of trichloroisocyanuric acid in butan-2-one. The treated rubber surface showed increased peel strength in joints made with polyurethane adhesive. The effects of chlorination on the rubber surface were studied using scanning electron microscopy, contact angle measurements, and infrared spectroscopy. It was shown that cracks appear in the rubber surface after halogenation, a factor which favours adhesion; the larger the amount of trichloroisocyanuric acid used, the larger the number of cracks. On the other hand, chlorination of the carbon double bond (butadiene) and the formation of carboxylic acid groups seem to be the most important chemical changes in the chlorinated rubber surfaces. Chlorination increases the surface energy of the rubber, although this increase is a function of the rubber composition. In fact, for a simple rubber formulation, the polar component of the surface energy increases for the highest concentrations of chlorine on the rubber surface; but for rubber with a more complicated formulation, the same value of surface energy after chlorination was obtained, independently of the amount of trichloroisocyanuric acid added. A good correlation was found between the contact angle measurements, the infrared spectra, and the peel strength values.     

Surface modification of synthetic vulcanized rubber

Surface modifications produced by treatments (mainly halogenation) of synthetic vulcanized styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR) leading to increased adhesion properties with polyurethane adhesives have been studied. T-peel tests, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), advancing contact angle measurements, infra-red (IR) spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) were used to analyze the nature of surface modifications produced in the rubber. Although some surface heterogeneities were created, physical treatments (ultrasonic cleaning, solvent wiping, abrasion) did not noticeably increase the adhesion strength because certain abhesive substances (e.g. zinc stearate, paraffin wax) cannot be removed from the rubber surface by such treatments. Chemical treatment (chlorination) was carried out using ethyl acetate solutions of trichloroisocyanuric acid (TCI) (1,3,5-trichloro-1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-trione). Chlorination of SBR with trichloroisocyanuric acid produced a significant improvement in T-peel strength, due to the contribution of mechanical (surface roughness, microcracks), thermodynamical (increase of polar contribution to the surface energy) and chemical (removal of abhesive substances, creation of polar groups) rubber surface modifications. The strong adhesion between the chlorinated SBR surface and the polyurethane adhesive was due to the presence of oxidized species of >C=O, -C-OH and -COR type. Chlorination of SBR is a fast reaction which needs only a small concentration of chlorination agent (< 1 wt% TCI/ethyl acetate) to produce high adhesion levels. An increased amount of TCI facilitated the chlorination reaction progressing from the exterior to the internal rubber bulk; however, although a thicker layer of chlorinated rubber created no further increase in adhesion strength was obtained.     

TREATMENT OF VULCANIZED STYRENE-BUTADIENE RUBBER (SBR) WITH MIXTURES OF TRICHLOROISOCYANURIC ACID AND FUMARIC ACID

In this study, mixtures of trichloroisocyanuric acid (TCI) and fumaric acid (FA) solutions were applied to a difficult-to-bond, vulcanized styrene-butadiene rubber (R2) to analyze the combined effect of both surface treatments. The treated R2 rubber surfaces were characterized using advancing contact angle measurements, ATR-IR and XPS spectroscopy, and SEM. T-peel tests of treated R2 rubber/ polyurethane adhesive/leather joints have been obtained in order to quantify the adhesion properties. The wettability of R2 rubber was improved by treatment with 3 wt% TCI/EA (ethyl acetate) or 0.5 wt% FA/EtOH, and lower contact angles were obtained by treatment with both 3 wt% TCI/EA and 0.5 wt% FA/EtOH. The improved wettability was ascribed to the creation of carbon-chlorine moieties, the removal of zinc stearate and paraffin wax, and the creation of surface roughness on the R2 rubber surface. Treatment of R2 rubber with 3 wt% TCI/EA before or after treatment with 0.5 wt% FA/EtOH, or with a solution containing 3 wt% TCI/EA + 0.5 wt% FA/EtOH mixture produced a noticeable increase in peel strength. Always, the effects of the treatment of R2 rubber with 3 wt% TCI solution were dominant over those produced by treatment with 0.5 wt% FA solution in ethanol (FA/EtOH). On the other hand, the treatment of R2 rubber with 3 wt% TCI/EA + 0.5 wt% FA/EtOH mixture was more effective than the treatment with 0.5 wt% TCI/EA+ 2 wt% FA/EtOH because the lower amount of chlorinating agent in this mixture.