Reduction by fentanyl of the Cp50 values of propofol and hemodynamic responses to various noxious stimuli

BACKGROUND: Propofol and fentanyl infusion rates should be varied according to the patient's responsiveness to stimulation to maintain satisfactory anesthetic and operative conditions. However, somatic and autonomic responses to various noxious stimuli have not been investigated systematically for intravenous propofol and fentanyl anesthesia. METHODS: Propofol and fentanyl were administered via computer-assisted continuous infusion to provide stable concentrations and to allow equilibration between plasma-blood and effect-site concentrations. The propofol concentrations needed to suppress eye opening to verbal command and motor responses after 50-Hz electric tetanic stimulation, laryngoscopy, tracheal intubation, and skin incision in 50% or 95% of patients (Cp50 and Cp95) were determined at fentanyl concentrations of 0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 ng/ml in 133 patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery. The ability of propofol with fentanyl to suppress hemodynamic reactions in response to various noxious stimuli also was evaluated by measuring arterial blood pressure and heart rate before and after stimulation. RESULTS: The various Cp50 values for propofol alone (no fentanyl) for the various stimuli increased in the following order: Cp50loss of consciousness, 4.4 microg/ml (range, 3.8-5.0); Cp50tetanus, 9.3 microg/ml (range, 8.3-10.4); Cp50laryngoscopy, 9.8 microg/ml (range, 8.9-10.8); Cp50skin incision, 10.0 microg/ml (range, 8.1-12.2); and Cp50intubation, 17.4 microg/ml (range, 15.1-20.1; 95% confidence interval). The reduction of Cp50loss of consciousness, with fentanyl was minimal; 11% at 1 ng/ml of fentanyl and 17% at 3 ng/ml of fentanyl. A plasma fentanyl concentration of 1 ng/ml (3 ng/ml) resulted in a 31-34% (50-55%) reduction of the propofol Cp50s for tetanus, laryngoscopy, intubation, and skin incision. Propofol alone depresses prestimulation blood pressure but had no influence on the magnitude blood pressure or heart rate increase to stimulation. Propofol used with fentanyl attenuated the systolic blood pressure increases to various noxious stimuli in a dose-dependent fashion. CONCLUSIONS: The authors successfully defined the propofol concentration required for various stimuli. Tracheal intubation was the strongest stimulus. The absence of somatic reactions for propofol does not guarantee hemodynamic stability without fentanyl. Propofol with fentanyl was able to suppress motor and hemodynamic reactions to various noxious stimuli.     

Hemodynamic response to induction and intubation. Propofol/fentanyl interaction

BACKGROUND: When given as an intravenous bolus for induction of anesthesia, propofol can decrease postintubation hypertension but can also create moderate to severe postinduction, preintubation hypotension. The addition of fentanyl usually decreases the postintubation hypertension but can increase the propofol-induced preintubation hypotension. The goal of the study was to determine the relation between propofol and fentanyl doses and the hemodynamic changes post-induction, preintubation and postintubation. METHODS: Twelve groups of 10 patients, ASA physical status 1 or 2, first received fentanyl 0, 2, or 4 micrograms.kg-1 and then 5 min later received propofol 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, or 3.5 mg.kg-1 as an intravenous bolus for induction of anesthesia. Arterial blood pressure was continuously monitored. The trachea was intubated 4 min after propofol administration. RESULTS: The mean decrease in systolic blood pressure after propofol was 28 mmHg when no fentanyl was given, 53 mmHg after 2 microgram.kg-1 of fentanyl (P < 0.05 vs. no fentanyl), and 50 mmHg after 4 micrograms.kg-1 (P < 0.05 vs. no fentanyl; no statistically significant difference 4 vs. 2 micrograms.kg-1). There was no statistically significant difference in hemodynamic response to intubation relative to propofol dose. Hemodynamic response to intubation was decreased by the administration of fentanyl; the mean increase of systolic blood pressure after intubation was 65 mmHg from preintubation value without fentanyl, 50 mmHg after 2 micrograms.kg-1, and 37 mmHg after 4 micrograms.kg-1 (P < 0.05 for 2 and 4 micrograms.kg-1 vs. no fentanyl and for 4 vs. 2 micrograms.kg-1). Hemodynamic changes postintubation were not statistically different with increasing doses of propofol. CONCLUSIONS: Hemodynamic changes after induction with propofol or propofol/fentanyl, pre- or postintubation, are not modified when the propofol dose is increased from 2 to 3.5 mg.kg-1. Maximal hypotension preintubation occurs with a fentanyl dose of 2 micrograms.kg-1, whereas the magnitude of postintubation hypertension is significantly decreased with an increase in the fentanyl dose to 4 micrograms.kg-1.     

Relation between impedance and electrode temperature during radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory pathways and atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy, impact on hemodynamics, safety profiles, and cost of combined administration of propofol and midazolam (synergistic sedation) vs. midazolam and propofol administered as sole agents, for sedation of mechanically ventilated patients after coronary artery bypass grafting. DESIGN: Prospective, controlled, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. SETTING: Intensive care unit of SCIAS-Hospital de Barcelona. PATIENTS: Seventy-five mechanically ventilated patients who underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery under low-dose opioid anesthesia. INTERVENTIONS: According to the double-blind method, patients were randomly assigned to receive propofol (n = 25), midazolam (n = 25), or propofol combined with midazolam (n = 25). Infusion rates were adjusted to stay between 8 and 11 points on Glasgow Coma Score modified by Cook and Palma. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mean +/- SD duration of sedation was 14.4 +/- 1.5 hrs, 14.1 +/- 1.1 hrs, and 14.7 +/- 1.9 hrs for the propofol, midazolam, and synergistic groups, respectively. The induction dose was 0.55 +/- 0.05 mg/kg for propofol as sole agent, 0.05 +/- 0.01 mg/kg for midazolam as sole agent, and 0.22 +/- 0.03 mg/kg for propofol administered in combination with 0.02 +/- 0.00 mg/kg of midazolam (p = .001). The maintenance dose was 1.20 +/- 0.03 mg/kg/hr for propofol as sole agent, 0.08 +/- 0.01 mg/kg/hr for midazolam as sole agent, and 0.50 +/- 0.09 mg/kg/hr for propofol administered in combination with 0.03 +/- 0.01 mg/kg/hr of midazolam (p < .001). All sedative regimens achieved similar efficacy in percentage of hours of adequate sedation (93% for propofol, 88% for midazolam, and 90% for the synergistic group, respectively). After induction, both propofol and midazolam groups had significant decreases in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, left atrial pressure, and heart rate. Patients in the synergistic group had significant bradycardia throughout the study, without impairment in other hemodynamic parameters. Patients sedated with propofol or synergistic regimen awoke sooner and could be extubated before those patients sedated with midazolam (0.9 +/- 0.3 hrs and 1.2 +/- 0.6 hrs vs. 2.3 +/- 0.8 hrs, respectively, p = .01). Synergistic sedation produced cost savings of 28% with respect to midazolam and 68% with respect to propofol. CONCLUSIONS: In the study conditions, the new synergistic treatment with propofol and midazolam administered together is an effective and safe alternative for sedation, with some advantages over the conventional regimen with propofol or midazolam administered as sole agents, such as absence of hemodynamic impairment, >68% reduction in maintenance dose, and lower pharmaceutical cost.     

Incremental bolus versus a continuous infusion of propofol for deep sedation/general anesthesia during dentoalveolar surgery

PURPOSE: This article compared the use of the traditional incremental bolus technique with the continuous infusion technique for the administration of propofol for deep sedation/general anesthesia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were sedated with midazolam and fentanyl and then had maintenance of an anesthetic state achieved with propofol administered by either of the two techniques. Data were collected to evaluate the overall surgical/anesthetic procedure, movement of the patient, and his or her hemodynamic status. RESULTS: Both groups received a mean maintenance dose of propofol exceeding 6 mg/kg/hr. However, the patients in the continuous infusion group received a statistically greater maintenance dose (continuous infusion + supplemental vs incremental bolus). All patients were maintained in a deep sedation/general anesthetic state. Respiratory and blood pressure values were comparable in both groups. However, the continuous infusion group showed improved hemodynamic stability manifested as fewer fluctuations in heart rate. Visual analog scale (VAS) questionnaires completed by the surgeon and surgical assistant reported less patient movement and improved surgical/anesthetic conditions with the continuous infusion technique. Recovery of the two groups was comparable. CONCLUSION: This study, although finding advantages in the continuous infusion technique, showed satisfactory conditions associated with both techniques.     

Helicobacter pylori eradication in the healing and recurrence of benign gastric ulcer: a two-year, double-blind, placebo controlled study

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of monitored anesthesia care (MAC) in patients who undergo a novel treatment for hepatocellular cancer in which procedure-related hemodynamic instability is problematic. DESIGN: Nonrandomized open study. SETTING: University cancer center operating room. PATIENTS: Nine patients scheduled for hepatic arterial infusion of doxorubicin with complete hepatic venous isolation and extracorporeal chemofiltration (no more than 3 procedures per patient). INTERVENTIONS: Hepatic venous isolation was achieved with a dual-balloon inferior vena cava catheter connected to an extracorporeal circuit containing chemofilters. Doxorubicin was infused through the hepatic artery and filtered from the venous blood, which was returned to the patient through an internal jugular venous catheter. Each patient received a bolus of propofol (200 micrograms/kg) and one of alfentanil (2 micrograms/kg) followed by simultaneous infusions of propofol and alfentanil for percutaneous placement of the catheters and operation of the extracorporeal circuit. Drug rates were varied to maintain a sedative-analgesic state of calm, comfort, minimal movement, and adequate respiratory function. Prior to circuit initiation, patients were preloaded with crystalloid. During circuit operation, hypotension was treated with intravenous (IV) phenylephrine and crystalloid. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: End-tidal CO2 (PETCO2), respiratory rate, oxygen saturation (SaO2), arterial blood pressure (BP), and heart rate (HR) were monitored. Systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure (MAP), and HR were compared before, during, and after hepatic venous isolation and chemofiltration. Doses and infusion rates of propofol, alfentanil, and phenylephrine were recorded for each treatment. Hypotension occurred in 11 of 13 procedures when blood was directed through the chemofilters and was successfully treated with phenylephrine (dose range 40 to 5,733 micrograms) and crystalloid. Blood pressure returned to the baseline value on termination of the circuit. Throughout the sedation, patients were easily arousable, analgesia was adequate, and PETCO2 level of 38 +/- 4 mmHg and SaO2 greater than 94% were maintained. Mean doses and infusion rates of MAC drugs were, respectively: propofol, 261 +/- 88 mg and 23.7 +/- 3.6 micrograms/kg/min; alfentanil, 3,350 +/- 1,468 micrograms and 0.32 +/- 0.14 microgram/kg/min. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing this novel cancer treatment are safely and effectively managed by MAC achieved with simultaneous infusions of alfentanil and propofol. Procedure-associated hypotension is easily treated with IV phenylephrine and crystalloid.     

Streptokinase-induced activation of the kallikrein-kinin system and of the contact phase in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is hampered by a considerable reocclusion rate. Thrombin activity is enhanced, and contact-system activation via plasminemia might be possible. Prospectively we examined the contact phase and the kallikrein-kinin system and additional molecular markers of hemostasis and fibrinolysis in AMI. In 22 patients with AMI, blood sampling was performed at admission and < or =10 days afterward. Eleven patients received 1.5 Mio U streptokinase (group A) and were compared with 11 AMI patients without thrombolytic therapy (group B). All patients had systemic heparinization (5,000 IU bolus, i.v.; 1,000 IU/h, i.v.). In group A (vs. group B), the kallikrein-factor XII system was significantly activated (3 h after start of therapy): kallikrein activity 140 +/- 41 (vs. 43 +/- 8) U/L (p < 0.05); kallikrein inhibition 87 +/- 9 (vs. 113 +/- 7%; p < 0.05), and factor XII 70 +/- 14 (vs. 94 +/- 6%). C1 inhibitor and factor XII inhibition were decreased. High-molecular-weight kininogen consumption indicating bradykinin generation was enhanced (p < 0.01). In group A, thrombin activity (TAT) was increased, and a hypercoagulative state with increased fibrin degradation products (d-dimer) was found. Plasmin activation in group A was reflected by decreased plasminogen and antiplasmin levels (p < 0.01). The findings indicate that streptokinase induces activation of the contact phase-kinin system in vivo associated with a consecutive increase of thrombin and bradykinin generation. Activation of this pathway might substantially contribute to reocclusion after initially successful thrombolytic therapy and to hypotensive reactions observed after streptokinase.     

Thoracolumbar epidural blockade as adjunct to high dose fentanyl/midazolam anesthesia in coronary surgery: effects of sternotomy

The present study tests the hypothesis that the changes in myocardial lactate metabolism in the early period of coronary surgery are caused by raised adrenergic activity, and that these are preventable by the addition of thoracolumbar epidural blockade to high dose fentanyl/midazolam anesthesia. Twenty-seven male beta 1-blocked patients undergoing coronary surgery were included in a prospective, controlled, randomized study. High dose fentanyl/midazolam anesthesia alone (control) or supplemented with thoracolumbar epidural blockade (treatment) was used. Measurements were performed before the induction of anesthesia and after sternotomy. After sternotomy adrenaline (A) and noradrenaline (NA) had decreased and were both in the low range, especially in the epidural group (P < 0.01). Arterial pressures decreased in both groups, especially in the epidural group, where coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) decreased from 61 (42-88) to 48 (33-64) mm Hg; Systemic vascular resistance (SVR) decreased with 30% in the epidural group (P < 0.01), but not significantly in the control group. The myocardial fractional extraction of lactate decreased in both groups, from 33 (10-45) to 13 (0-42)% in the control group (P < 0.01), and from 36 (19-43) to 10 (2-20)% in the epidural group. It is concluded that high dose fentanyl/midazolam anesthesia prevents hyperadrenergic activity in the early phase of coronary surgery, but cannot eliminate changes in myocardial lactate metabolism. The addition of the thoracolumbar epidural blockade to high dose fentanyl/midazolam anesthesia offers no obvious benefits in the early phase of coronary surgery.     

Temperature-dependent formation of a conjugate between tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane buffer and the malondialdehyde-DNA adduct pyrimidopurinone

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) on total and unbound plasma concentrations of propofol and midazolam when administered by continuous infusion during cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-four adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received either propofol or midazolam to supplement fentanyl anesthesia. Twelve patients received a propofol bolus (1 mg/kg) followed by an infusion of 3 mg/kg/hr. A second group received midazolam, 0.2 mg/kg bolus, followed by an infusion of 0.07 mg/kg/hr. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Blood sample were collected from the radial artery cannula at 0, 2, 4, 8, 8, 10, 15, 20 minutes and then every 10 minutes before CPB, at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 10, 15, 20 minutes and then each 10 minutes during CPB. On weaning from CPB samples were collected at 0, 5, 10 and 20 minutes. Plasma binding, total and unbound propofol and midazolam concentrations were determined by ultrafiltration and high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC). CPB resulted in a fall in total propofol and midazolam plasma concentrations, but the unbound concentrations remained stable. The propofol unbound fraction increased from 0.22 +/- 0.06% to 0.41 +/- 0.17%. The midazolam unbound fraction increased from 5.6 +/- 1.0% to 11.2 +/- 2.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Unbound concentrations of propofol and midazolam are not affected by cardiopulmonary bypass. Total intravenous anesthesia algorithms do not need to be changed to achieve stable unbound plasma concentrations when initiating CPB.     

Comparison of propofol and methohexital continuous infusion techniques for conscious sedation

PURPOSE: Methohexital and propofol have been shown to be effective agents for continuous intravenous infusion to produce conscious sedation during oral surgical procedures. The current study was conducted to compare these techniques for intraoperative cardiopulmonary stability, patient cooperation, amnesia, comfort, recovery time, and postoperative nausea and vomiting. METHODS: Seventy ASA Class I or Class II patients between the ages of 18 and 40 years, scheduled for surgical extraction of impacted third molars, were entered into the study. Thirty-five patients were assigned to group A (methohexital) and 35 were assigned to group B (propofol). Intravenous sedation was accomplished using premedication with 1.5 microg/kg of fentanyl and 0.05 mg/kg of midazolam followed by the continuous infusion of methohexital or propofol at a rate of 50 microg/kg/min. The infusion was then titrated to 100 microg/kg/min to accomplish a level of sedation in which the eyes were closed and the patients were responsive to verbal commands. Subjects were monitored for variability of heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, amnesia, comfort, cooperation, nausea and vomiting, and recovery time based on cognitive, perceptual, and psychomotor tests. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference between the two medication groups except for heart rate, which was found to increase by 11 beats/min for group A and only three beats/min in group B. CONCLUSION: A continuous infusion technique using either methohexital or propofol (50 to 100 microg/kg/min) was found to be safe and effective, with no clinically significant differences in cooperation, cardiopulmonary stability, recovery time, amnesia, comfort, and the incidence of nausea or vomiting. However, the cost-effectiveness of methohexital is superior to that of propofol.     

Inhibition of presenilin 1 expression is promoted by p53 and p21WAF-1 and results in apoptosis and tumor suppression

Pain on injection is one of the well-known side effects of propofol. Previous studies have shown several methods to alleviate this discomfort. We employed all these methods together to clarity whether pain-free injection of propofol was possible. Sixty adult patients premedicated with midazolam were studied. Control group patients (n = 20) received an induction dose of propofol via a vein on the dorsum of the hand at a slow injection speed with carrier i.v. fluid. Study group patients (n = 40) received i.v. fentanyl 0.1 mg, followed by bolus injection of cold propofol premixed with lidocaine (final concentration of lidocaine was 0.2%) in a forearm vein without carrier i.v. fluid. Eighteen patients (90%) in the control group experienced injection pain. In the study group, however, no patients complained of pain or discomfort. In conclusion, pain-free injection of propofol was possible when prior-administration of fentanyl, premixing of lidocaine, cooling to 4 degrees C, and rapid injection via a forearm vein without carrier i.v. fluid was the adopted precedure.     

ST segment changes in the ECG. Anesthesia induction with propofol, etomidate or midazolam in patients with coronary heart disease

Induction of anaesthesia with propofol and fentanyl can lead to marked reductions in mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR). Thus, the application of propofol in patients with severely reduced coronary artery perfusion is controversial. METHODS. The study group consisted of 60 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Anaesthesia was induced over 30 s with propofol (P 1.5 mg/kg), etomidate (E 0.3 mg/kg), or midazolam (M 0.15 mg/kg) following a bolus dose of fentanyl (5 micrograms/kg). Vecuronium was used as a muscle relaxant. During induction we continuously measured MAP and HR and recorded the occurrence of myocardial ischaemia using an automatic ST-segment analyser (Marquette 7010). ST-segment deviations of more than 1 mm in leads II and V5 were interpreted as significant signs of myocardial ischaemia. RESULTS. All groups showed reductions in MAP and HR on induction that were marked in the P group. Intubation caused elevation of MAP and HR to pre-induction levels (HR: all groups) or slightly above (MAP: E, M). Four patients in the P group and 3 in each other group showed significant ST-segment deviation prior to induction. In the P group these deviations disappeared in 2 patients after injection while they remained unchanged in the M group. In the E group injection had no effect on the ischaemic ECG changes but produced another case of significant ST-segment deviation. Laryngoscopy and intubation produced no further significant ST-segment deviation in either group. DISCUSSION. Induction is a critical phase of anaesthesia, especially in patients with limited coronary reserve. Induction agents should alleviate the stress response while causing minimal haemodynamic changes. Despite marked reductions in MAP in the P group, the number of patients with ischaemic ECG changes was cut by half. Their number was unchanged or even raised in the other groups. After application of P, with an alleged reduction of coronary perfusion, a compensational reduction in myocardial oxygen consumption may occur.     

Effectiveness of polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies prepared for an immunoassay of the etofenprox insecticide

The aim of this study was to compare hemodynamic responses to intubation and pin head-holder application in two groups of neurosurgical patients given oral clonidine (3 microg/kg) or oral temazepam (10-20 mg) 90 min before the induction of anesthesia. Fifty patients undergoing elective craniotomy were randomized to either group. Anesthesia was induced with i.v. propofol 1500 mg/h, fentanyl 4 microg/kg, vecuronium 0.15 mg/kg, and lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg and was maintained with propofol 6 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1). Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate were recorded before the induction of anesthesia and before and after intubation and application of the pin head holder. Interventions required to maintain hemodynamic stability were compared between groups. Preinduction sedation scores and MAP values were similar between groups. MAP was significantly lower (P = 0.031) in the clonidine group after pin head-holder application. Interventions to stabilize MAP were not significantly different between groups (P = 0.11). We conclude that clonidine is effective in reducing the MAP increase with pin head-holder application in patients undergoing craniotomy. Implications: In this study, we investigated an approach to the prevention of increased blood pressure often seen during the early part of anesthesia for brain surgery. Oral clonidine was effective in reducing the mean arterial blood pressure increase resulting from pin head-holder application. Clonidine, a blood pressure-reducing drug, was given to 25 patients before anesthesia. Their blood pressure measurements were then compared with those of 25 patients not given clonidine.     

The effect of sedation on oxygen uptake during spontaneous breathing

Sedation may be used in intensive care and emergency medicine to improve the oxygen demand/delivery ratio. The influence of sedation has most frequently been investigated in a dose-related manner. The aim of the present study was to determine the effect-related influence of different sedatives on oxygen uptake (VO2) in relation to defined resting conditions. METHODS. Forty ASA I patients who had to undergo a minor surgical procedure were investigated 1.5 h before surgery at basal energy-expenditure measurement conditions. One of the following substances was given with a preset bolus rate in a double-blind, randomised order until a defined level of sleep or side effects was encountered: propofol (n = 8), midazolam (n = 8), thiopentone (n = 8), sodium chloride (n = 8), and fentanyl (n = 8). The sleep level was defined as sluggish response to a loud voice or tapping on the forearm. The variables VO2, carbon dioxide elimination (VCO2), end tidal CO2 (p(et)CO2), oxygen saturation (SaO2), heart rate, systemic blood pressure, skin temperature, and skin resistance on the sole of the foot were documented on-line on a computer. All variables were compared using differences of averages from 10-min periods before and after sedation during which the VO2 was minimal. RESULTS. The mean VO2 before sedation was 264 +/- 60 ml/min, and the measured energy expenditure did differ by -0.2% (+/- 14%) from mean predicted values using the Harris-Benedict equation. The VO2 was reduced by 15 +/- 2% with propofol, by 12 +/- 8% with midazolam, and by 10 +/- 5% with thiopentone. This was statistically significant compared to placebo treatment, as was the difference between propofol and thiopentone effects. All patients in these groups reached the defined sleep level, which was not achieved by the placebo and fentanyl groups. Placebo treatment changed the VO2 by 0.1% (+/- 2%). Fentanyl increased the VO2 by 5% (+/- 8%), which did not reach significance. In the fentanyl group the bolus application had to be stopped at a p(et)CO2 of 50 mm Hg in all patients. In the propofol, midazolam, and thiopentone groups the phasic changes of skin resistance were reduced to zero and the skin temperature increased from 27 +/- 2 degrees C to 32 +/- 2 degrees C. The fentanyl group showed an increase in changes of skin resistance without changes in temperature. CONCLUSIONS. Sleep induced by propofol, midazolam, or thiopentone to a clinically maximal desirable level in spontaneously breathing patients reduced VO2 by 10% to 15%. This level of sedation did not induce a relevant change in P(et)CO2 or SaO2. The effect of propofol appeared to be the most pronounced and least variable. This may be attributable to a more pronounced reduction in single-organ VO2 or to an undetected difference in level of sedation. Fentanyl did, in contrast to most publications on opioid effects, seem to increase VO2. Underlying mechanisms may be sought in an increased rate-pressure product and sympathetic activity on the basis of hypercapnia and changes in muscle tension.     

Anesthetic management of a patient with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using propofol, fentanyl and ketamine

A 59-year-old male with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy was scheduled for resection of a maxillary cyst. Metoprolol was discontinued the day before surgery. Thirty min before anesthesia, meperidine 35 mg was administered intramuscularly. After intravenous administration of midazolam 3 mg, a pulmonary catheter was inserted for monitoring hemodynamic parameters. Anesthesia was induced with propofol 75 mg, fentanyl 0.15 mg and ketamine 75 mg. Anesthesia was maintained with continuous infusion of propofol 5 mg.kg-1.h-1 and ketamine 1 mg.kg-1.h-1. Moreover, fentanyl was added as necessary during surgery. Blood pressure (BP), pulmonary arterial pressure (PA), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) and pulmonary vascular resistance index (PVRI) were measured using a pulmonary catheter during anesthesia. Since BP decreased after intubation, dopamine 3 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 was administered for 20 min. The hemodynamic state was stable during surgery. However, BP, PA, SVRI and PVRI increased temporally at extubation. His postoperative course was uneventful. In conclusion, total intravenous anesthesia with propofol, fentanyl and ketamine may be useful for anesthetic management of a patient with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.     

Co-induction and laryngeal mask insertion. A comparison of thiopentone versus propofol

Conditions for insertion of the laryngeal mask airway were assessed in 70 unpremedicated patients comparing the co-induction with midazolam-alfentanil-thiopentone and midazolam-alfentanil-propofol. Following pre-induction doses of midazolam 0.04 mg.kg-1 and alfentanil 10 micrograms.kg-1, patients received equipotent doses of either thiopentone or propofol. Whilst jaw relaxation and ease of laryngeal mask insertion were similar between the two groups, patients receiving propofol were less likely to have undesired responses requiring additional boluses of induction agent (p < 0.05). We conclude that, using these doses, propofol is superior to thiopentone for laryngeal mask airway insertion when using a co-induction technique.     

Propofol or midazolam for sedation and early extubation following cardiac surgery

PURPOSE: The purpose of this randomized, double-blind study was to evaluate the efficacy of midazolam and propofol for postoperative sedation and early extubation following cardiac surgery. METHODS: ASA physical status II-III patients scheduled to undergo elective first-time cardiac surgery with an ejection fraction > 45% were eligible. All patients received a standardized sufentanil/isoflurane anaesthesia. During cardiopulmonary bypass 100 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 propofol was substituted for isoflurane. Upon arrival in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), patients were randomized to either 10 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 propofol (n = 21) or 0.25 microgram.kg-1.min-1 midazolam (n = 20). Infusion rates were adjusted to maintain sedation within a predetermined range (Ramsay 2-4). The infusion was terminated after four hours. Patients were weaned from mechanical ventilation and their tracheas extubated when Haemodynamic stability, haemostasis, normothermia and mental orientation were confirmed. Haemodynamic measurements, arterial blood gas tensions and pulmonary function tests were recorded at specified times. RESULTS: There were no differences between the two groups for the time spent at each level of sedation, number of infusion rate adjustments, amount of analgesic and vasoactive drugs, times to awakening and extubation. The costs of propofol were higher than those of midazolam. There were no differences in haemodynamic values, arterial blood gas tensions and pulmonary function. CONCLUSION: We conclude that midazolam and propofol are safe and effective sedative agents permitting early extubation in this selected cardiac patient population but propofol costs were higher.     

Stability of ondansetron hydrochloride and 12 medications in plastic syringes

The stability and compatibility of ondansetron hydrochloride with neostigmine methylsulfate, naloxone hydrochloride, midazolam hydrochloride, fentanyl citrate, alfentanil hydrochloride, atropine sulfate, morphine sulfate, meperidine hydrochloride, propofol, droperidol, metoclopramide monohydrochloride, and glycopyrrolate were studied. Ondansetron 1.33 or 1.0 mg/mL was combined with 0.9% sodium chloride injection and each of the 12 drugs in duplicate in plastic syringes (or glass for propofol). The syringes were stored at 21.8-23.4 or 4 degrees C in the dark, except for those containing propofol, which were stored at ambient temperature. Samples were removed at 0, 4, 8, and 24 hours for analysis by high-performance liquid chromatography and pH measurement; the propofol-containing samples were removed at 0, 1, 2, and 4 hours. Syringes were visually assessed for color and clarity, and particulate content was measured with a particle counter at the end of the study period. All solutions containing ondansetron retained more than 90% of their initial ondansetron concentration. Solutions containing each of the other drugs except droperidol retained more than 90% of their initial concentration of these drugs. The solutions containing droperidol retained more than 90% of their initial droperidol concentration for up to eight hours at ambient temperature but precipitated quickly at 4 degrees C. In combinations of ondansetron 1.33 or 1.0 mg/mL and 10 of 12 drugs, all drugs were stable for 24 hours in plastic syringes at 23 and 4 degrees C; ondansetron hydrochloride 1.0 mg/mL and propofol 1.0 and 5.0 mg/mL in admixtures were stable for 4 hours, and droperidol on its own and combined with ondansetron 1.0 mg/mL was stable for no more than 8 hours at ambient temperature.     

Endocrine stress reaction, hemodynamics and recovery in total intravenous and inhalation anesthesia. Propofol versus isoflurane

This prospective, randomised study compared total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) and inhalation anaesthesia with respect to endocrine stress response, haemodynamic reactions, and recovery. METHODS. The investigation included two groups of 20 ASA I-II patients 18-60 years of age scheduled for orthopaedic surgery. For premedication of both groups, 0.1 mg/kg midazolam was injected IM. Patients in the propofol group received TIVA (CPPV, PEEP 5 mbar, air with oxygen FiO2 33%) with propofol (2 mg/kg for induction followed by an infusion of 12-6 mg/kg.h) and fentanyl (0.1 mg before intubation, total dose 0.005 mg/kg before surgery, repetition doses 0.1 mg). For induction of patients in the isoflurane-group, 5 mg/kg thiopentone and 0.1 mg fentanyl was administered. Inhalation anaesthesia was maintained with 1.2-2.4 vol.% isoflurane in nitrous oxide and oxygen at a ratio of 2:1 (CPPV, PEEP 5 mbar). For intubation of both groups, 2 mg vecuronium and 1.5 mg/kg suxamethonium were injected, followed by a total dose of 0.1 mg/kg vecuronium. Blood samples were taken through a central venous line at eight time points from before induction until 60 min after extubation for analysis of adrenaline, noradrenaline (by HPLC/ECD), antidiuretic hormone (ADH), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), and cortisol (by RIA). In addition, systolic arterial pressure (SAP) heart rate (HR), arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2), and recovery from anaesthesia were observed. RESULTS. Group mean values are reported; biometric data from both collectives were comparable (Table 1). Plasma levels of adrenaline (52 vs. 79 pg/ml), noradrenaline 146 vs. 217 pg/ml), and cortisol (82 vs. 165 ng/ml) were significantly lower in the propofol group (Table 2, Figs. 1 and 3). Plasma levels of ADH (4.8 vs. 6.1 pg/ml) and ACTH (20 vs. 28 pg/ml) did not differ between the groups (Table 2, Figs 2 and 3). SAP (128 vs. 131 mmHg) was comparable in both groups, HR (68/min vs. 83/min) was significantly lower in the propofol group, and SpO2 (97.1 vs 97.4%) showed no significant difference (Table 3). Recovery from anaesthesia was slightly faster in the propofol group (following of simple orders 1.9 vs. 2.4 min, orientation with respect to person 2.4 vs. 3.4 min, orientation with respect to time and space 2.8 vs. 3.7 min), but differences failed to reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS. When compared with isoflurane inhalation anaesthesia, moderation of the endocrine stress response was significantly improved during and after TIVA with propofol and fentanyl. Slightly shorter recovery times did not lead to an increased stress response. With respect to intra- and postoperative stress reduction, significant attenuation of sympatho-adrenergic reaction comparable SAP and reduced HR, sympatholytic and hypodynamic anaesthesia with propofol and fentanyl seems to be advantageous for patients with cardiovascular and metabolic disorders. For this aim, careful induction and application of individual doses is essential.     

Comparative study of preemptive and postincisional lumbar epidural morphine in pulmonary resection. Preliminary report

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and incidence of side effects of two types of lumbar epidural analgesia with morphine, preemptive or postincisional, combined with total intravenous anesthesia in chest surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This double-blind prospective study enrolled 20 patients (ASA I-IV) undergoing lobectomy or pneumonectomy. Anesthetic induction and maintenance was provided with propofol, atracurium and alfentanil. Lumbar epidural analgesia (L2-L3) with morphine was provided for group A patients with 2 to 4 mg upon excision of tissue and for group B with 2 to 4 mg during anesthetic induction. The following variables were recorded: arterial blood gas concentrations, heart rate, SpO2, EtCO2, postanesthetic recovery, arterial gases, side effects and pain on a visual analogue scale. Top-up analgesia was provided by intravenous metamizole and/or epidural morphine. For statistical analysis we used ANOVA, chi-square tests and Student-Newman-Keuls tests. RESULTS: The need for propofol and alfentanil during anesthesia, and for morphine and metamizole after surgery were statistically greater in group A. Pain 18 hours after surgery was also greater in group A. No significant differences between groups for other variables was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Preemptive analgesia with lumbar epidural morphine in addition to the general anesthesia described here seems to provide higher-quality analgesia with few side effects, reducing the need for propofol and alfentanil during surgery and for postoperative morphine and metamizole.     

Effects of sufentanil on cerebral hemodynamics and intracranial pressure in patients with brain injury

BACKGROUND: The current study investigates the effects of sufentanil on cerebral blood flow velocity and intracranial pressure (ICP) in 30 patients with intracranial hypertension after severe brain trauma (Glasgow coma scale < 6). METHODS: Mechanical ventilation (FIO2 0.25-0.4) was adjusted to maintain arterial carbon dioxide tensions of 28-30 mmHg. Continuous infusion of midazolam (200 micrograms/kg/h intravenous) and fentanyl (2 micrograms/kg/h intravenous) was used for sedation. Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP, mmHg) was adjusted using norepinephrine infusion (1-5 micrograms/min). Mean blood flow velocity (Vmean, cm/s) was measured in the middle cerebral artery using a 2-MHz transcranial Doppler sonography system. ICP (mmHg) was measured using an epidural probe. After baseline measurements, a bolus of 3 micrograms/kg sufentanil was injected, and all parameters were continuously recorded for 30 min. The patients were assigned retrospectively to the following groups according to their blood pressure responses to sufentanil: group 1, MAP decrease of less than 10 mmHg, and group 2, MAP decrease of more than 10 mmHg. RESULTS: Heart rate, arterial blood gases, and esophageal temperature did not change over time in all patients. In 18 patients, MAP did not decrease after sufentanil (group 1). In 12 patients, sufentanil decreased MAP > 10 mmHg from baseline despite norepinephrine infusion (group 2). ICP was constant in patients with maintained MAP (group 1) but was significantly increased in patients with decreased MAP. Vmean did not change with sufentanil injection regardless of changes in MAP. CONCLUSIONS: The current data show that sufentanil (3 micrograms/kg intravenous) has no significant effect on middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity and ICP in patients with brain injury, intracranial hypertension, and controlled MAP. However, transient increases in ICP without changes in middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity may occur concomitant with decreases in MAP. This suggests that increases in ICP seen with sufentanil may be due to autoregulatory decreases in cerebral vascular resistance secondary to systemic hypotension.