Stem cell factor mRNA expression and production in human nasal epithelial cells: contribution to the accumulation of mast cells in the nasal epithelium of allergy

BACKGROUND: In allergic rhinitis, mast cells are increased in number in the epithelium of the nasal mucosa and play an important role in the immediate response. However, the mechanism of the accumulation is not known. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the nasal epithelial cells produce stem cell factor (SCF), the mast cell growth and chemoattractant factor, and contribute mast cell hyperplasia in the epithelium of allergic rhinitis. METHODS: We have characterized the cellular localization of SCF using immunohistochemistry, reverse transcribed-PCR, and ELISA; compared SCF production of cultured epithelial cells between patients with allergic rhinitis and nonallergic subjects; and compared the SCF production with the number of mast cells and the histamine content in the nasal epithelial scrapings. RESULTS: Immunohistochemically, SCF was identified in the nasal epithelium of the biopsy specimens and in cultured nasal epithelial cells. SCF mRNA was expressed by cultured nasal epithelial cells not only in patients with allergy but also in subjects with no allergy. However, the SCF/beta-actin mRNA ratio and SCF production in day 7 cultured epithelial cells was significantly higher in allergic than in nonallergic subjects (P =. 0424, P =.0085, respectively). SCF production from nasal scrapings in culture was strongly correlated with the number of mast cells (r = 0.506, P =.0023) and the histamine content (r = 0.480, P =.0040). CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that nasal epithelial cells produce SCF and may be important in the attraction, proliferation, and activation of mast cells in allergic inflammation in the nose.     

Effect of betotastine besilate (TAU-284), a novel anti-allergic agent, on experimental allergic rhinitis

We investigated the effect of betotastine besilate (betotastine) on the experimental allergic rhinitis. The oral administration of betotastine (1, 3 and 10 mg/kg) inhibited the increase in dye leakage during and after the nasal perfusion of antigen in actively sensitized rats. It also prevented the increase in intranasal pressure induced by topically applied histamine in non-sensitized guinea pigs. Cetirizine and terfenadine dose-dependently inhibited the increase in a similar manner. Ketotifen (0.01-0.3 mg/kg, p.o.) inhibited the increase more than 50% at 0.01 mg/kg. The ID50s of ketotifen, cetirizine, betotastine and terfenadine for this model were more than 0.01 mg/kg, 0.01 mg/kg, 0.03 mg/kg and 0.5 mg/kg, respectively. Furthermore, in actively sensitized guinea pigs, nasal airway resistance showed a biphasic increase after the topical antigen challenge to the nasal cavity; the first peak at 0.5 hr and a second peak at 4 hr. Both the responses of first and second peaks were significantly inhibited by orally administered betotastine besilate, and its inhibitory effect on the second peak was the strongest among drugs tested. Since betotastine showed significantly inhibitory effects in experimental allergic rhinitis models, it was suggested to show a good efficacy for the treatment of allergic rhinitis clinically.     

Prevalence of malingering in inpatient suicide ideators and attempters

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: In an attempt to study the pathogenesis of mucosal hypersensitivity in allergic rhinitis, we investigated the suppressive effects of cyclosporin A (CyA) and glucocorticosteroids on ovalbumin (OA)-induced hypersensitivity to topical histamine challenge. MATERIALS: Actively sensitized Dunkin-Hartley guinea pigs. TREATMENT: OA and alum were applied to guinea pigs intraperitoneally 3 times at two-week intervals. After general sensitization, OA inhalation was performed every day for 6 days as topical sensitization. Before inhalation, treatment with CyA (50 mg/kg, p.o.), glucocorticosteroids (beclomethasone propionate (1.0 mg/kg, i.p.), fluticasone propionate (FP, 0.5 mg/kg, i.p.)) or vehicle were performed, and the sensitivity to histamine was measured before and after the inhalation. Moreover, in actively (general and topical) sensitized guinea pigs, FP (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) was applied every day for 5 days and histamine sensitivity was evaluated before and after the application. RESULTS: We found that histamine sensitivity was significantly increased by nasal antigen challenge in this guinea pig model, and that the occurrence of histamine hypersensitivity was inhibited by the pretreatment with CyA and glucocorticosteroids. Although multiple administration of FP gradually reduced the histamine hypersensitivity according to the period of administration, it did not significantly alter the histamine hypersensitivity after the occurrence of hypersensitivity. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that CyA and glucocorticosteroids suppress antigen-induced histamine hypersensitivity in a guinea pig model of allergic rhinitis.     

Inhaled procaterol inhibits histamine-induced airflow obstruction and microvascular leakage in guinea-pig airways with allergic inflammation

BACKGROUND: Beta2-adrenoceptor agonists (beta2-agonists) are shown to inhibit airway microvascular leakage in experimental animals. This effect may change in animals with chronic airway inflammation. OBJECTIVE: We examined whether inhaled beta2-agonists inhibit microvascular leakage in guinea-pig airways with chronic allergic inflammation. METHODS: Three weeks after the sensitization with ovalbumin (OA; 6 mg/mL), each guinea pig was challenged with inhaled OA once a day for 1 or 3 weeks. Control animals without sensitization with OA also inhaled vehicle for OA (saline) for 3 weeks. One day after the last challenge, different doses of inhaled procaterol (1, 3 or 10 microg/mL) or vehicle was given to animals for 10 min after an anaesthesia. Fifteen minutes after the end of inhalation, the animals were given i.v. Evans blue dye (EB dye; 20 mg/kg), a marker of microvascular leakage, and then i.v. histamine (3 or 30 microg/kg) or vehicle. Lung resistance, a parameter of airflow obstruction, was measured for 6 min and the lungs were removed to calculate the amount of extravasated EB dye into the airways. RESULTS: A significant increase in eosinophil infiltration into the airways was seen in sensitized and challenged animals compared with control animals without sensitization. Among animals receiving antigenic exposure for either 0 (control), 1 or 3 weeks, 10 microg/mL procaterol significantly inhibited 30 microg/kg histamine-induced increase in EB dye extravasation to a similar degree (ranged from 28.7 to 69.8% inhibition) as well as that in lung resistance (more than 90% inhibition in all groups). The minimal dose of procaterol to inhibit 3 microg/kg histamine-induced microvascular leakage was not different between nonsensitized control animals and those sensitized and challenged for 3 weeks at all airway levels. CONCLUSION: Inhaled beta2-adrenoceptor agonists may be also potent in attenuating microvascular leakage even in the airways with chronic allergic inflammation.     

Substance P is generated in vivo following nasal challenge of allergic individuals with bradykinin

BACKGROUND: Bradykinin, a potent inflammatory mediator, is released during allergic and non-allergic rhinitis and asthma in man. Nasal bradykinin challenge induces a dose-dependent plasma leakage into the nasal cavity and relevant symptoms of rhinitis. OBJECTIVE: We now report on substance P generation during nasal bradykinin challenge in vivo. METHODS: The effect of locally applied bradykinin on substance P generation was studied in nine individuals, allergic to grass pollen and six non-allergic controls. In the allergics TAME-esterase activity, histamine and substance P concentrations were measured in nasal lavages and correlated to the clinical symptoms. RESULTS: Substance P concentrations in nasal lavages increased in a dose-dependent fashion during nasal bradykinin challenge in both groups. In the allergic group Substance P-increases correlated with the production of TAME-esterase activity (r = 0.9, P < 0.05) whereas these allergic individuals did not produce any histamine increases. The generation of substance P and the increase of TAME-esterase activity was associated with the onset of clinical symptoms. Correlation of oedema and hypersecretion to substance P were significant by linear regression analysis (r = 0.88, P < 0.005 and r = 0.89, P < 0.02, respectively). Bradykinin induced irritations like burning and itching were short-term and rare. Serial dilutions of nasal washes produced Substance P-RIA displacement curves that paralleled the standard curve and recovery of standard substance P that was added to nasal washes was 76 +/- 4% (mean +/- SEM), n = 8. CONCLUSION: Bradykinin induces in vivo a dose-dependent plasma leakage into the nasal cavity without affecting mast cells, but stimulates nerve endings resulting in the release of the neuropeptide substance P.     

Suppression of human melanoma metastasis following introduction of chromosome 6 is independent of NME1 (Nm23)

BACKGROUND: Nasal immunotherapy with single allergen extracts, following premedication with cromolyn, has been reported to be effective in treating seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the efficacy, tolerability, and mechanism of action of nasal immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis caused by weed pollens from three unrelated families. Twenty-seven weed-allergic patients underwent baseline nasal provocation and titrated skin test with a mixed weed extract containing ragweed, sage, and Chenopod extracts. Patients were randomized to receive either mixed weed extract or placebo. Nasal immunotherapy was self-administered daily to alternate nostrils preceded by 5.2 mg intranasal cromolyn. Beginning with 1:2500 wt/vol the concentration was increased to 1:10 wt/vol over an average period of 36 days. The maintenance dose (1:10 wt/vol) was administered daily for 12 to 16 weeks through the weed pollen season. Patients recorded nasal and eye symptoms and the use of rescue medications throughout the study. A nasal lavage for cytokine levels and nasal scraping with Rhinoprobe for nasal cytology were performed at the peak of the weed season. Nasal provocation and titrated skin tests with mixed weed extract were repeated after the weed season. Nasal lavage and scraping were also performed before and 24 hours after the final nasal provocation. RESULTS: During the peak weeks of the weed season the group receiving mixed weed extract by nasal instillation, compared with those treated with placebo, had significantly lower total nasal symptom scores, total eye symptom scores, and symptom medication scores. There were no significant differences in the nasal cytology or cytokines levels between the two groups, except for elevated IL-10 in the nasal lavage in the treated group at the peak of the season. Nasal symptoms and medication use were higher preseasonally in the active treatment group. CONCLUSION: Nasal immunotherapy with aqueous mixed weed extract administered with cromolyn sodium pretreatment for 17 to 21 weeks was effective in reducing both nasal and ocular symptoms of weed pollen-induced allergic rhinitis. There were increased nasal symptoms in the treated group preseasonally.     

Detection and quantification of Epstein-Barr virus EBER1 in EBV-infected cells by fluorescent in situ hybridization and flow cytometry

BACKGROUND: The level of histamine in nasal lavage fluid has been used as an index of mast cell/basophil activation in a number of studies. Obviously, such an index can only be valid if changes in the secretory activity of nasal glands do not affect the level of histamine in lavage fluid (i.e. hypersecretion, without a simultaneous activation of mast cells/basophils in the nasal mucosa, must not increase the level of histamine). OBJECTIVES: To asses the effect of nasal hypersecretion on histamine levels in lavage fluid. METHODS: Nasal challenges were performed with methacholine and allergen in grass pollen-allergic patients and non-allergic controls. Nasal lavage fluid was collected before and repeatedly for nine hours after nasal challenge, and the level of histamine was compared with that of a specific mast cell-derived enzyme, tryptase. In addition, the effect of methacholine on basophils was examined in vitro. RESULTS: Allergen challenge of allergic patients produced sneezing and a significant increase in histamine and tryptase levels, whereas challenge of non-allergic subjects produced no such response. Interestingly, challenge with methacholine also induced a significant increase in histamine levels. This increase was seen in both allergic and non-allergic subjects and it was not associated with any sneezing or increase in tryptase levels, indicating that mast cells were not activated. Furthermore, stimulation of basophils with methacholine did not induce any histamine release in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: Apparently, there exists a pool of histamine in the human nose that can be transferred to lavage fluid during glandular hypersecretion. The source of this histamine is yet to be identified. As the level of histamine seems to be affected by the secretory activity of nasal glands, we question the use of this single mediator as an index of mast cell/basophil activation in nasal lavage studies.     

The role of partial splenectomy in children with thalassemia

AIM OF THE STUDY: To study the changes in nasal reactivity in patients with rhinitis medicamentosa during treatment with placebo or fluticasone propionate, in order to better understand the mechanisms of nasal congestion in such patients. STUDY DESIGN: A parallel, double-blind study. Twenty patients with rhinitis medicamentosa were randomized to either placebo or fluticasone treatment during 14 days. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Nasal mucosa reactivity was studied with a histamine challenge model using three concentrations of histamine to challenge the nasal mucosa (1, 2 and 4 mg histamine/ml). Recordings of the nasal mucosa response were made 5 min after each challenge, using rhinostereometry and acoustic rhinometry, before and after the period of treatment. RESULTS: The fluticasone group had a significantly increased histamine sensitivity after treatment, unlike the placebo group who had an unchanged or slightly decreased histamine sensitivity after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study support the theory that the nasal obstruction in rhinitis medicamentosa is due to interstitial oedema rather than to vasodilatation. On the first day of vasoconstrictor withdrawal, the inferior concha was congested and oedematous with a limited capacity to respond to histamine challenge. However, after 14 days of treatment with a corticosteroid nasal spray, the oedema was reduced and the increase in histamine sensitivity reflected the persistence of nasal hyperrreactivity. In the placebo group, histamine sensitivity remains unchanged with the measuring technique we used. This probably indicates that oedema was still present after treatment.     

Local IgE production in nasal allergy

IgE mediates allergic reactions by binding to the high-affinity receptor, Fc epsilonR1, on mast cells and basophils at mucosal surfaces; then cross-linking of the receptor by multivalent antigen triggers the allergic response. We demonstrate here that B cells in the nasal mucosa of patients with hay fever express IgE. The results also suggest that allergen-induced heavy-chain switching to IgE occurs locally within the nasal mucosa. Local IgE synthesis may explain why some 'atopic' patients develop rhinitis whereas others have either no clinical manifestations or develop atopic disease elsewhere.     

Intranasal azelastine. A review of its efficacy in the management of allergic rhinitis

Azelastine, a phthalazinone compound, is a second generation histamine H1 receptor antagonist which has shown clinical efficacy in relieving the symptoms of allergic rhinitis when administered as either an oral or intranasal formulation. It is thought to improve both the early and late phase symptoms of rhinitis through a combination of antihistaminic, antiallergic and anti-inflammatory mechanisms. Symptom improvements are evident as early as 30 minutes, after intranasal administration of azelastine [2 puffs per nostril (0.56mg)] and are apparent for up to 12 hours in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). The effect on nasal blockage is variable: in some studies objective and/or subjective assessment showed a reduction in blockage, whereas in other studies there was no improvement. Intranasal azelastine 1 puff per nostril twice daily is generally as effective as standard doses of other antihistamine agents including intranasal levocabastine and oral cetirizine, ebastine, loratadine and terfenadine at reducing the overall symptoms of rhinitis. The relative efficacies of azelastine and intranasal corticosteroids (beclomethasone and budesonide) remain unclear. However, overall, the corticosteroids tended to improve rhinitis symptoms to a greater extent than the antihistamine. Azelastine was well tolerated in clinical trials and postmarketing surveys. The most frequently reported adverse events were bitter taste, application site irritation and rhinitis. The incidence of sedation did not differ significantly between azelastine and placebo recipients and preliminary report showed cardiovascular parameters were not significantly altered in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR). Conclusion: Twice-daily intranasal azelastine offers an effective and well tolerated alternative to other antihistamine agents currently recommended for the symptomatic relief of mild to severe SAR and PAR in adults and children (aged > or = 12 years in the US; aged > or = 6 years in some European countries including the UK). The rapid onset, confined topical activity and reduced sedation demonstrated by the intranasal formulation of azelastine may offer an advantage over other antihistamine agents, although this has yet to be confirmed.     

Experimental models of nasal hypersensitive reaction

An experimental animal models of nasal hypersensitive reaction had been developed in twelve guinea pigs by intranasal applications of 2.4-toluene diisocynate (TDI). Symptoms, morphological appearance of the nasal mucosal scrapings and tissue pathology were studied, and the histamine content in the turbinates evaluated. The results showed a typical picture of nasal hypersensitive reaction. A plenty of eosinophils and mast cells was found on the surface of the nasal mucosa. A marked infiltration of the eosinophils was seen not only in the subepithalial connective tissue but also in the epithelial layer and in the enlarged venous vessels. Significantly higher levels of histamine were detected in the mucosa from TDI treated animals than in control animals (P < 0.01). We consider the experimental models to be ideal.     

Cervical actinomycosis. A rare differential diagnosis of parotid tumor]

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis is usually treated with oral antihistamines or nasal steroids. Topically active nasal antihistamine is a new treatment modality for allergic rhinitis. The efficacy in comparison to well established topical treatment alternatives is not fully known. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of intranasally administered azelastine to budesonide, at their respectively recommended dosage, on the symptoms of perennial rhinitis patients. METHODS: A placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel group study was conducted to compare the efficacy and tolerability of intranasal budesonide aqueous suspension (256 microg once daily) with azelastine hydrochloride nasal spray (280 microg twice daily (560 microg/day)) and with placebo in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis. The 195 patients (with at least a 2-year history of perennial allergic rhinitis) recorded individual nasal symptom scores, the degree of symptom control achieved and any adverse events experienced over a 2-week baseline period and a 6-week treatment period. RESULTS: Following treatment, the reductions in mean combined and individual nasal symptom scores from baseline values were significantly greater in the budesonide group compared with the placebo group (P < .0001 for all variables except runny nose P = .01). In patients treated with budesonide, there were also significantly larger reductions from baseline values in combined nasal symptom scores (P < .01) and in scores for all individual nasal symptoms (P < or = .05) compared with those treated with azelastine. The reductions from baseline in both combined and individual nasal symptom scores did not differ between azelastine and placebo. The study medications were well tolerated, producing no unexpected or serious treatment-related adverse events. CONCLUSION: A once-daily dose of 256 microg of intranasal budesonide aqueous suspension is significantly more effective at relieving the symptoms of perennial allergic rhinitis compared with a twice daily dose of 280 microg of azelastine nasal spray.     

Soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 level in sera is elevated in perennial allergic rhinitis

Soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1) in sera was measured in some allergic disorders, but serum sICAM-1 levels in perennial allergic rhinitis remain to be determined. Our study was aimed at elucidating whether the serum sICAM-1 levels in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis are different from those in nonatopic healthy volunteers and whether immunotherapy can modulate sICAM-1 levels. Serum sICAM-1 was determined in 20 nonallergic volunteers and 137 patients with perennial allergic rhinitis by a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Our study demonstrated that the level of sICAM-1 in untreated patients is significantly elevated, as compared with nonatopic subjects. Immunotherapy could decrease sICAM-1 in perennial allergic rhinitis, but this suppressive effect became apparent only after many years of immunotherapy. In patients on immunotherapy, a close correlation was observed between sICAM-1 and nasal symptom scores. To take these lines of evidence together, a decrease in sICAM-1 might be related to the working mechanism of immunotherapy, and serum sICAM-1 could be used to monitor the effect of immunotherapy.     

Intranasal fluticasone propionate is more effective than terfenadine tablets for seasonal allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND: We compared the efficacy and tolerability of the intranasal corticosteroid fluticasone propionate with that of the antihistamine terfenadine in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. METHODS: Two hundred thirty-two adults and adolescents with seasonal allergic rhinitis received intranasal fluticasone propionate (200 micrograms once daily), terfenadine tablets (60 mg twice daily), or placebo for 2 weeks in a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study. Main outcome measures were clinician- and patient-rated individual and total nasal symptom scores (based on ratings of nasal obstruction, sneezing, nasal itching, and rhinorrhea); clinician-rated overall response to therapy; changes in nasal inflammatory cell counts; adverse events; and morning plasma cortisol concentrations. RESULTS: Both clinician- and patient-rated total and individual nasal symptom scores were significantly lower in the fluticasone group than in either the terfenadine group or the placebo group at nearly every measured time point throughout the treatment period. After 2 weeks of therapy, clinician-rated total nasal symptom scores decreased by 49% in the fluticasone group compared with 27% in the terfenadine group and 19% in the placebo group. In general, therapy with terfenadine was not statistically distinguishable from that with placebo based on patient-rated total or individual nasal symptom scores. According to clinician ratings, 64% of fluticasone-treated patients compared with 49% and 44% of patients treated with terfenadine and placebo, respectively, experienced significant or moderate improvement. A greater percentage of fluticasone-treated patients compared with either terfenadine- or placebo-treated patients experienced reductions in intranasal eosinophil and basophil counts after 2 weeks of therapy. No unusual or serious drug-related adverse events were reported. Morning plasma cortisol concentrations after 2 weeks of therapy did not differ among groups. CONCLUSION: Fluticasone aqueous nasal spray, a well-tolerated corticosteroid preparation that can be administered once daily, is more effective than terfenadine tablets or placebo in controlling symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis.     

Specific immunotherapy--past--present--future

Specific immunotherapy or hyposensitization has been used extensively for almost 90 years as a specific treatment of IgE-mediated allergic diseases. In hayfever and allergic asthma due to house-dust mites and animal danders (especially cat) immunotherapy is highly effective and used worldwide. The term "local immunotherapy" stands for topical administration of specific IT in allergic disorders and includes local nasal, bronchial, oral and sublingual immunotherapy. Today bronchial and oral IT can not yet be recommended for clinical practice. Local nasal IT may be indicated in carefully selected adult patients with rhinitis caused by grass- and Parietaria-pollen allergy. Sublingual (swallow) IT with pollen (Grass/Parietaria) and mite extracts can be recommended in adult patients with allergic rhinitis.     

The relationships between nasal hyperreactivity, quality of life, and nasal symptoms in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND: A clinical test that could inform the clinician about the severity of a patient's nasal symptoms and health-related quality of life (QOL) would be very useful. OBJECTIVE: We attempted to determine whether, in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis, nasal challenge with histamine could be used to estimate daily symptoms and QOL. METHODS: Forty-eight patients with perennial allergic rhinitis were challenged with histamine to determine nasal hyperreactivity. Nasal response was monitored by the number of sneezes, the amount of secretion, and a symptom score. Daily nasal symptoms were recorded during the 2 preceding weeks. Patients also completed a rhinitis QOL questionnaire. RESULTS: Responsiveness to histamine and total daily nasal symptoms were moderately correlated (r = 0.51, p = 0.001). Comparison of total daily nasal symptoms with the overall QOL score showed a moderate correlation (r = 0.59, p < 0.001). Nasal response to histamine and overall QOL score were also correlated (r = 0.43, p = 0.002). However, overall QOL and daily nasal symptoms could be predicted by wide 95% confidence intervals only for each decade of nasal responsiveness to histamine (expressed as a composite symptom score). CONCLUSION: In patients with perennial allergic rhinitis nasal hyperreactivity as determined by histamine challenge, QOL, and daily nasal symptoms are moderately correlated. Therefore nasal histamine challenge can be used as a tool for estimating the severity of daily nasal symptoms and QOL, although it cannot predict nasal symptoms and QOL very accurately.     

Mometasone furoate. A review of its intranasal use in allergic rhinitis

Mometasone furoate is a synthetic corticosteroid which has been evaluated for intranasal use in the treatment of adults and children with allergic rhinitis. In several large, well-controlled clinical trials, mometasone furoate 200 micrograms administered once daily as an aqueous intranasal spray was significantly more effective than placebo in controlling the symptoms associated with moderate to severe seasonal or perennial allergic rhinitis. Mometasone furoate was as effective as twice-daily beclomethasone dipropionate or once-daily fluticasone propionate in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis, and was as effective as twice-daily beclomethasone dipropionate and slightly more effective than once-daily oral loratadine in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Mometasone furoate was also as effective as twice-daily beclomethasone dipropionate or once-daily budesonide, and significantly more effective than placebo in the prophylaxis of seasonal allergic rhinitis. The onset of action of mometasone furoate was approximately 7 hours in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Mometasone furoate was as well tolerated as beclomethasone dipropionate, fluticasone propionate and budesonide in clinical trials, with an overall incidence of adverse events similar to placebo. Adverse events were generally mild to moderate and of limited duration. The most common adverse events associated with mometasone furoate therapy were nasal irritation and/or burning, headache, epistaxis and pharyngitis. Intranasal or oral mometasone furoate had no detectable effect on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function in studies of < or = 1 year in duration. CONCLUSIONS: Mometasone furoate is a well tolerated intranasal corticosteroid with minimal systemic activity and an onset of action of < or = 7 hours. It is effective in the prophylaxis and treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis and the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis in patients with moderate to severe symptoms.     

The Conconi test

Our purpose was to determine if the study of rhinitis is useful in the diagnosis of asthma. We formulated the hypothesis that the inflammation of the upper airway reflects the inflammation of the lower airway. It was found that there are allergens that produce rhinitis more frequently than asthma, and vice versa. This can be explained by size. This explanation, however, is questionable as the allergic proteins are extracted from the carrying agent, and through the lymphatic route or the blood, reach the entire human organism. It was also found that with bronchoalveolar lavage in allergic asthma it is possible to obtain the same results for eosinophils as with a nasal wash or using Citospyn. However, the results in the late phase are questionable. In the immediate phase and in the late phase, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) was detected in the blood (in asthma) and in nasal washes (in rhinitis). In the immediate response tryptase was detected from the mast cells. The role of leukotrienes in asthma and rhinitis is well established in the early and late response. The use of leukotriene inhibitors guarantee their importance in the airway. Platelet-activating factor (PAF) has been demonstrated to increase vascular permeability and the use of antagonists were the best nasal feature. The inhalation of histamine caused bronchospasm, while instillation of histamine in the nasal passages increased resistance. With this information it seems that our hypothesis has been confirmed. Rhinitis and BHR together are equivalent to asthma, although the PFER decreases during the course of nasal provocation test (NPT) in nonasthmatic patients. In pure rhinitis patients, however, we find decreases in PFER due to effort. All this suggests that the study of nasal inflammation is still unclear with regard to bronchial inflammation.     

Chronic sinusitis: characterization of cellular influx and inflammatory mediators in sinus lavage fluid

Chronic sinusitis is a recurrent disorder commonly found in atopic individuals, yet few studies have explored the role of inflammatory mediators in sinusitis. Sinus lavage fluid from ten patients with chronic sinusitis obtained during endoscopic surgery was analyzed for total cell counts and then assayed for histamine, immunoreactive leukotriene C4/D4/E4 (LTC4/D4/E4), and prostaglandin D2 (PGD2). All ten patients had been unresponsive to medical treatment, including oral corticosteroids in most cases. High concentrations of histamine, LTC4/D4/E4 and PGD2 were found in sinus fluid and were comparable to levels seen in nasal secretions of allergic rhinitis patients following allergen challenge. In the sinus fluid, inflammatory cells were predominantly neutrophils with only low percentages of mast cells, basophils or eosinophils. On the basis of the histamine and PGD2 concentrations in sinus fluid, we conclude that mast cell/basophil activation does occur in chronic sinusitis and may contribute to the persistent inflammation present in sinusitis.