Oculocerebrocutaneous syndrome: report of three additional cases and aetiological considerations

Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been recognized, with increasing concern, as a potentially disabling illness, occurring either as a symptom of many cardiac diseases or as an isolated disorder. It can independently contribute to mortality and morbidity and may have serious prognostic importance in acute or chronic cardiac disease. In patients with symptomatic drug refractory atrial fibrillation, ventricular rate control by atrioventricular nodal ablation or modification commonly results in pacemaker implantation. The concept of AF prevention by pacemaker therapy has been introduced in patients with bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome or vagally mediated bradycardia-dependent AF. In patients with sick sinus syndrome, atrial pacing has proved to be more effective than VVI pacing in maintaining the electrical stability of the atrium in long-term follow up. Recently, the development of new techniques of atrial pacing employing pacing at two atrial sites may improve the effectiveness of the AF prevention by pacemaker therapy. Dual-site right atrial pacing using overdrive stimulation activates simultaneously the high right atrium and the left atrium via the ostium of the coronary sinus. Two main mechanisms have been proposed to explain the favourable effect of this technique. One is the suppression of atrial premature beats initiating AF by the overdrive pacing. The second is the alteration of atrial activation pattern by preexcitation of the area of the coronary sinus ostium which permits earlier recovery of excitability in sites of atrial conduction delay. The combination of drug therapy and pacing is essential for effective AF control. We have hitherto studied 30 patients with single- and dual-site pacing. Single-site pacing was performed at the high right atrium or coronary sinus ostium. The dual-site pacing mode increased the arrhythmia-free intervals, decreased patients' arrhythmia-related symptoms and anti-arrhythmic drug use as compared to the period preceding institution of pacing and incrementally over conventional high right atrial pacing alone. A multicentre randomized trial, Dual-site Atrial Pacing for Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation (DAPPAF), evaluating three pacing modes (dual-site, single-site and support pacing), is now in progress.     

Atrial septal pacing: a method for pacing both atria simultaneously

By pacing both atria simultaneously, one could reliably predict and optimize left-sided AV timing without concern for IACT. With synchronous depolarization of the atria, reentrant arrhythmias might be suppressed. We studied four male patients (73 +/- 3 years) with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and symptomatic bradyarrhythmias using TEE and fluoroscopy as guides; a standard active fixation screw-in lead (Medtronic model #4058) was attached to the interatrial septum and a standard tined lead was placed in the ventricle. The generators were Medtronic model 7960. The baseline ECG was compared to the paced ECG and the conduction time were measured to the high right atrium, distal coronary sinus and atrial septum in normal sinus rhythm, atrial septal pacing, and AAT pacing. On the surface ECG, no acceleration or delay in AV conduction was noted during AAI pacing from the interatrial septum as compared with normal sinus rhythm. The mean interatrial conduction time for all 4 patients was 106 +/- 2 ms; the interatrial conduction time measured during AAT pacing utilizing the atrial septal pacing lead was 97 +/- 4 ms (P = NS). During atrial septal pacing, the mean conduction time to the high right atrium was 53 +/- 2 ms. The mean conduction time to the lateral left atrium during atrial septal pacing, was likewise 53 +/- 2 ms. We conclude that it is possible to pace both atria simultaneously from a single site using a standard active fixation lead guided by TEE and fluoroscopy. Such a pacing system allows accurate timing of the left-sided AV delay.     

Coronary sinus pacing initiates counterclockwise atrial flutter while pacing from the low lateral right atrium initiates clockwise atrial flutter. Analysis of episodes of direct initiation of atrial flutter

INTRODUCTION: Rapid atrial pacing in sinus rhythm may directly induce atrial flutter without provoking intervening atrial fibrillation, or initiate atrial flutter indirectly, by a conversion from an episode of transient atrial fibrillation provoked by rapid atrial pacing. The present study was performed to examine whether or not the direct induction of clockwise or counterclockwise atrial flutter was pacing-site (right or left atrium) dependent. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed the mode of direct induction of atrial flutter by rapid atrial pacing. In 46 patients with a history of atrial flutter, rapid atrial pacing with 3 to 20 stimuli (cycle length = 500 - 170 ms) was performed in sinus rhythm to induce atrial flutter from 3 atrial sites, including the high right atrium, the low lateral right atrium, and the proximal coronary sinus, while recording multiple intracardiac electrograms of the atria. Direct induction of atrial flutter by rapid atrial pacing was a rare phenomenon and was documented only 22 times in 15 patients: 3, 11, and 8 times during stimulation, respectively, from the high right atrium, low lateral right atrium, and the proximal coronary sinus. Counterclockwise atrial flutter (12 times) was more frequently induced with stimulation from the proximal coronary sinus than from the low lateral right atrium (8 vs 1, P = .0001); clockwise atrial flutter (10 times) was induced exclusively from the low lateral right atrium (P = .0001 for low lateral right atrium vs proximal coronary sinus, P = .011 for low lateral right atrium vs high right atrium). CONCLUSIONS: Direct induction of either counterclockwise or clockwise atrial flutter was definitively pacing-site dependent; low lateral right atrial pacing induced clockwise, while proximal coronary sinus pacing induced counterclockwise atrial flutter. Anatomic correlation between the flutter circuit and the atrial pacing site may play an important role in the inducibility of counterclockwise or clockwise atrial flutter.     

A 7-day activity diary for assessment of daily energy expenditure validated by the doubly labelled water method in adolescents

Several authors have reported the single atrioventricular (AV) electrode, comprising an atrial dipole floating in the right atrium, to be a system capable of providing results which are just as satisfactory as those of conventional systems (DDD). Between August 1992 and March 1995, a VDD single electrode pacemaker was implanted in 65 patients (mean age: 73 years +/- 17.2). The indication for implantation was isolated high degree AVB with no apparent sinus dysfunction. Four pacemakers were used: Vitatron (n = 24), Intermedics (n = 23), Medico (n = 13), Biotronik (n = 5). Intraoperative atrial endocavitary recording was 1.8 mV +/- 0.74. 17 patients died from a cause unrelated to pacemaker dysfunction. 4 patients were lost to follow-up. The remaining 44 patients were reviewed in our centre with a mean follow-up of 14.5 months +/- 7 months. Seven pacemakers (16%) were reprogrammed in VVI or VVI (R) mode, because of permanent atrial fibrillation in 3 cases, complete loss of atrial reception in 2 cases and late onset sinus dysfunction in 1 case. In the 41 patients in sinus atrial rhythm, the atrioventricular synchronization rate was greater than 90% in 88% of patients, equal to 76.3% in 2.4% of patients and atrioventricular synchronization was impossible in 9.6% of cases. CONCLUSION: The overall results of our preliminary experience of VDD mode single electrode pacemaker are moderate. The poor results essentially concerned patients with paroxysmal atrial arrhythmias prior to pacing.     

Impact of electric cardiac stimulation on ventricular function and the natural history of patients with myocardiopathy

There has recently been an increasing interest in beneficial effects of cardiac pacing in patients with myocardial diseases, especially in Obstructive Hypertrophic and Dilated Cardiomyopathy. The experience with dual-chamber pacing for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is now important. DDD pacing for sinus rhythm patients and VVI pacing in patients with atrial fibrillation have shown considerable symptomatic improvement, with a significant decrease of angina, dyspnea, presyncope and frank syncope. It has been suggested that DDD pacing may prevent sudden death and improve survival rates in these patients, but this has not yet been established. The experience with DDD pacing in dilated cardiomyopathy is more limited, but in specially chosen patients, DDD pacing with short AV delay has shown symptomatic improvement and a decrease in the need for further hospitalization due to worsening of heart failure. There is no current evidence of higher survival rates with this treatment, but DDD pacing may be used in patients with end-stage dilated and isquemic cardiomyopathy who are waiting for a heart transplantation.     

Effects of different atrial pacing modes on atrial electrophysiology: implicating the mechanism of biatrial pacing in prevention of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND: Multiple-site atrial pacing has been shown to prevent recurrence of atrial fibrillation. However, information about the mechanisms of different atrial pacing modes in prevention of atrial fibrillation was not clear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-two patients without structural heart disease were classified into group 1 and group 2 according to absence or presence of clinical atrial fibrillation, respectively. Atrial conduction time and electrogram width of the right posterior interatrial septum (RPS) were measured during drive-train stimulation (S1) and early extrastimulation (S2). The locations of S1 were the high right atrium (HRA), distal coronary sinus (DCS), or both sites simultaneously. Effective refractory periods (ERPs) of the HRA and DCS were also determined during S1 stimulation at each site and during biatrial pacing. The ERPs were not different between single-site atrial pacing and biatrial pacing. In contrast, early S2 stimulation at the HRA caused greater atrial conduction delay and greater increment of electrogram width of the RPS in patients with a history of atrial fibrillation. Biatrial pacing significantly reduced the conduction delay and electrogram width of the RPS caused by HRA extrastimulation. In addition, in 17 group 2 patients, atrial fibrillation was induced by an early HRA S2 coupled to HRA pacing. However, with the same coupling interval of S2 at HRA, only 6 of them had the arrhythmia induced during biatrial pacing. Furthermore, conduction delay and increase of electrogram width caused by early S2 at the HRA were reduced by biatrial pacing only in patients whose arrhythmia induction was successfully prevented by biatrial pacing. CONCLUSIONS: Biatrial pacing reduced both the atrial conduction delay and increase of electrogram width at the RPS caused by early S2 at HRA, and these effects could prevent induction of atrial fibrillation.     

The concurrent implantation of a last-generation automatic defibrillator and a 2-chamber pacemaker

BACKGROUND: Potentially lethal interactions between concomitantly implanted pacemaker and automatic first-generation cardioverter-defibrillator have been reported. We therefore evaluated the reliability and safety of simultaneous implantation of dual-chamber pacemakers with a fourth generation cardioverter-defibrillator incorporating an improved arrhythmia detection system. METHODS: Concomitant implantation of an automatic cardioverter defibrillator and a dual-chamber pacemaker was performed in four patients for malignant tachyarrhythmias and symptomatic bradycardia. Two Jewel 7219C and two Micro Jewel 7223 (Medtronic Inc.) implantable cardioverter defibrillators were connected to an endocardial lead (Medtronic Mod. 6936). In 2 patients with a previously implanted cardioverter-defibrillator, the pacemaker was connected to bipolar atrial and ventricular leads. In the 2 patients who already had a dual-chamber pacemaker, the unipolar pacing leads implanted previously were used. At the time of implantation of the second device, interaction testing was performed evaluating ventricular fibrillation detection during high-output asynchronous pacing. Testing for malfunctions, reprogramming or variations of pacing thresholds of the pacemakers after electric shocks was also carried out. Moreover, intracavitary signals, stimulation thresholds and electrical therapies delivered were evaluated during follow-up. RESULTS: During interaction testing, induced ventricular fibrillation was detected, with no delay, in 4/4 cases (100%). After a mean follow-up of 6.3 +/- 5 months (range 2-13), 5 shocks for ventricular fibrillation, 10 shocks for fast ventricular tachycardia and 72 antitachycardia pacings were delivered. All these electrical therapies were considered appropriate. No symptomatic sustained tachyarrhythmia remained undetected. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that concomitant implantation of a fourth-generation automatic cardioverter-defibrillator and a dual-chamber pacemaker using either unipolar or bipolar leads can be performed safely. Extreme caution and rigorous interactions testing is nevertheless advised when considering this device combination.     

Functional correlation of molecular electronic properties with potency of synthetic carbinolamine antimalarial agents

Dual chamber rate responsive pacing incorporating a mode switching option is increasingly used in patients with chronic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and high degree AV block. Single-lead VDDR pacemakers have rarely used for this indication. The purpose of this study was to determine their reliability of atrial sensing during atrial fibrillation, the percentage of atrial synchronous ventricular pacing, and the behavior of the sinus rate outside the phases of atrial fibrillation. We studied ten patients with a single-lead VDDR pacemaker implanted for this indication. Follow-up visits were performed at predischarge and after 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. During the mean follow-up period of 18.9 +/- 6.9 months, the atrial sensing thresholds in sinus rhythm remained stable. Atrial synchronous ventricular stimulation was achieved in 68.7 +/- 31.2% (median 82.5%) of the whole follow-up time. All patients showed an adequate atrial rate response during sinus rhythm. Atrial fibrillation was detected by the pacemakers in 24.0 +/- 29.8% of time. In 3 of 10 patients the duration of atrial fibrillation showed a steady increase from visit to visit. The sensed amplitudes of atrial fibrillation ranged from 0.1-1.0 mV. A programmed atrial sensitivity of 0.1 mV was necessary to achieve complete sensing of atrial fibrillation. None of the patients experienced tachycardias with optimized pacemaker programming. Single-lead VDDR pacing incorporating a mode-switching option is useful in patients with high degree AV block and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, since it provides atrial synchronous ventricular pacing in more than two-thirds of follow-up time. In a subgroup of patients, a progressive increase of the time during atrial fibrillation was demonstrated. A reliable detection of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation requires the programming of the atrial sensitivity to its most sensitive value.     

Single-chamber atrial pacing is better than single chamber ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome. Results of long-term follow up in a prospective randomized study

In a study of 225 patients with sick sinus syndrome randomized to single chamber atrial pacing (n = 110) or ventricular pacing (n = 115), atrial pacing was associated with less atrial fibrillation and thromboembolism after 3.3 years follow-up. To determine whether this beneficial effect of atrial pacing is maintained at long-term, follow-up was extended. Follow-up visits were at 3 months, 12 months, and then once every year, and included physical examination, ECG, and pacemaker check-up. After 5.5 years follow-up, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular deaths, atrial fibrillation, thromboembolism, and heart failure were significantly less in the atrial group. AV block occurred in four patients in the atrial group. The beneficial effect of atrial pacing observed previously is enhanced substantially after extended follow-up. Patients with sick sinus syndrome should be treated with an atrial pacing system.     

Vertebral artery injury in C1-2 transarticular screw fixation: results of a survey of the AANS/CNS section on disorders of the spine and peripheral nerves. American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to investigate the possible role of transesophageal echocardiography in the evaluation of patients with clinical pacemaker syndrome. BACKGROUND: Several reports on transthoracic echocardiographic features of ventricular pacing were described; however, no previous study of transesophageal echocardiography has been undertaken in patients at the severe end of pacemaker syndrome who need reprogramming of dual-chamber pacing for symptom relief. METHODS: Twelve patients with ventricular-inhibited pacemakers (VVI) with clinical symptomatic pacemaker syndrome (group I) and 10 patients with VVI without pacemaker syndrome (group II) were prospectively studied. The two groups were pacemaker dependent and had persistent ventriculoatrial conduction. Transesophageal echocardiographic parameters were assessed in group II and within 6 hours before reprogramming to the DDD mode in group I. Follow-up transesophageal echocardiographic study was performed 28+/-5 days after reprogramming in group I. RESULTS: All patients in group I had subjective improvements of symptoms after DDD reprogramming. The atrial reverse flow velocities of pulmonary veins in group I before reprogramming were significantly higher in group II (39.3+/-11.4 versus 15.7+/-13.5 cm/sec, p < 0.0001). Spontaneous echo contrast in the descending aorta was detected in all patients from group I before reprogramming. The prevalence of significant mitral regurgitation (> or = moderate) was significantly higher in group I before reprogramming than in group II (67% versus 8%, p = 0.01). Significant mitral regurgitation and spontaneous echo contrast in the descending aorta in group I disappeared after reprogramming to the DDD mode. CONCLUSIONS: Transesophageal echocardiography provides physiologic, pacemaker-related hemodynamic changes in paced patients. Significantly higher atrial reverse flow velocities of pulmonary veins, increased frequency of spontaneous echo contrast in the descending aorta, and significant mitral regurgitation are peculiar echocardiographic findings in patients with VVI with clinical pacemaker syndrome.     

Identification of atrial septal defects by cross-sectional contrast echocardiography

Cross-sectional echocardiography, combined with injections of contrast into peripheral arm veins, has been used to study 15 patients with atrial septal defects and 10 patients with an intact interatrial septum. Of 11 patients with ostium secundum or sinus venosus atrial septal defects and left-to-right shunts a defect could be visualised in all, and in eight some degree of transfer of contrast from right atrium to left atrium was seen. In three of four patients with a dominant right-to-left shunt a defect was seen and in all there was free transfer of contrast from right atrium to left atrium. Though there may be variable loss of echoes in the septal image in patients with an intact interatrial septum, in general no fixed defect is seen an there is no transfer of contrast from right atrium to left atrium. This is a potentially valuable technique in the assessment of patients in whom an atrial septal defect is suspected.     

Mechanisms for increasing stroke volume during static exercise with fixed heart rate in humans

Ten patients with preserved inotropic function having a dual-chamber (right atrium and right ventricle) pacemaker placed for complete heart block were studied. They performed static one-legged knee extension at 20% of their maximal voluntary contraction for 5 min during three conditions: 1) atrioventricular sensing and pacing mode [normal increase in heart rate (HR; DDD)], 2) HR fixed at the resting value (DOO-Rest; 73 +/- 3 beats/min), and 3) HR fixed at peak exercise rate (DOO-Ex; 107 +/- 4 beats/min). During control exercise (DDD mode), mean arterial pressure (MAP) increased by 25 mmHg with no change in stroke volume (SV) or systemic vascular resistance. During DOO-Rest and DOO-Ex, MAP increased (+25 and +29 mmHg, respectively) because of a SV-dependent increase in cardiac output (+1.3 and +1.8 l/min, respectively). The increase in SV during DOO-Rest utilized a combination of increased contractility and the Frank-Starling mechanism (end-diastolic volume 118-136 ml). However, during DOO-Ex, a greater left ventricular contractility (end-systolic volume 55-38 ml) mediated the increase in SV.     

Implantation of atrial pacemaker in patients with sinoatrial failure

From 1990 to 1997 a total of 42 atrial pacemakers (41 of them rate responsive) were implanted in patients with sick sinus syndrome at Aust-Agder Central Hospital, Arendal, Norway. 22 women and 20 men aged 42-86 years (average 69 years) were treated. Follow-up time was from 1-80 months (average 26 months). Sinusbradycardia and sinoatrial block were diagnosed in 17 patients, whereas 25 patients suffered from tachybrady syndrome. It was not necessary to change the pacemaker in any of the patients. One patient developed a second degree atrioventricular, Wenckebach type block, two patients developed permanent atrial fibrillation after seven and 43 months, respectively, and five patients were treated for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Thus, 34 patients had no need of antiarrhythmic treatment in the follow-up period. Although over 30% of patients who need a pacemaker in Norway suffer from sick sinus syndrome, only 8-12% of them are treated with atrial pacemakers. Recent studies have demonstrated that in patients with sick sinus syndrome there is greater improvement in prognosis and quality of life with physiological pacing than with ventricular pacing. Therefore, more patients should be considered for implantation of atrial pacemakers.     

An Italian experience of radiofrequency transcatheter ablation in type-I atrial flutter: the results and follow-up

BACKGROUND: Type I atrial flutter (AF) is a supraventricular tachycardia that is notoriously disabling and resistant to antiarrhythmic drugs. The introduction of an effective non-pharmacologic technique, such as radiofrequency catheter ablation (RF), opened new therapeutic prospects for the management of this arrhythmia. The aim of our study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy of atrial flutter RF using a successful procedure marker of bi-directional conduction block in the isthmus. METHODS: In the last consecutive 50 patients (pts) who underwent RF procedure for AF at our Center (46 pts during spontaneous or induced AF and 4 in sinus rhythm) after the successful interruption of AF we performed the usual reinduction attempts and well atrial pacing from 2 sites in the right atrium (in 18 pts before and after RF and in 32 only after RF). The sites of pacing were site 1: low lateral right atrium (LRA); site 2: proximal coronary sinus (PCS). The 50 pts consisted of 13 females, 37 males with a mean age of 62.5 +/- 9.7 years (35-83). The end-point for the procedure was: 1) abrupt interruption of AF; 2) inability to reinduce AF; 3) recognition of atrial activation sequence during pacing in LRA and in PCS compatible with conduction block in the isthmus. RESULTS: The RF was successful in terminating AF in all pts after 11 +/- 7 applications of energy. After ablation, sustained AF was no longer inducible by atrial pacing. After RF, during pacing in sinus rhythm from LRA, the lower septum and PCS presented a delayed activation after the His region. Similarly, during pacing from PCS after ablation, the atrial activation sequence was modified: the low lateral right atrium was now activated by a single front after the high lateral atrium. No acute complications were noted in any pts during or after procedure. AF recurred in 9 pts. Four pts now present chronic atrial fibrillation. The mean follow-up period is 14.8 +/- 8 months. All the patients were discharged without antiarrhythmic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The mechanism of successful ablation is the bi-directional conduction block in the isthmus with the evidence of the changes in the right atrial activation sequence during atrial pacing in sinus rhythm in LRA and in PCS before and after RF.     

Mechanisms and medical management of patients with atrial flutter

Type I atrial flutter is due to reentrant excitation, principally in the right atrium. The standard ECG remains the cornerstone for its clinical diagnosis. Acute treatment should be directed at control of the ventricular response rate and, if possible, restoration of sinus rhythm. Radiofrequency catheter ablation therapy provides the best hope of cure, although atrial fibrillation may subsequently occur after an ostensibly successful ablative procedure. Alternatively, antiarrhythmic drug therapy to suppress recurrent atrial flutter episodes may be useful, recognizing that occasional recurrences are common despite therapy. Radiofrequency ablation of the His bundle ablation with placement of an appropriate pacemaker system may be useful in selected patients.     

Bone marrow transplantation in the treatment of thalassemia

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the long-term results of the corridor operation in the treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation refractory to drug treatment. BACKGROUND: The corridor operation is designed to isolate from the left and right atrium a conduit of atrial tissue connecting the sinus node area with the atrioventricular node region in order to preserve physiological ventricular drive. The excluded atria can fibrillate without affecting the ventricular rhythm. This surgical method offers an alternative treatment when atrial fibrillation becomes refractory to drug treatment. PATIENTS: From 1987 to 1993, 36 patients with drug refractory symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation underwent surgery. The in hospital rhythm was followed thereafter by continuous rhythm monitoring and with epicardial electrograms. After discharge Holter recording and stress testing were regularly carried out to evaluate the sinus node function and to detect arrhythmias; whereas Doppler echocardiography was used to measure atrial contraction and size. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Maintained absence of atrial fibrillation without drug treatment after operation; preservation of normal chronotropic response in the sinus node. RESULTS: The corridor procedure was successful in 31 (86%) of the 36 patients. After a mean (SD) follow up of 41 (16) months 25 (69%) of the 36 patients were free of arrhythmias without taking drugs (mean (SE) actuarial freedom at four years 72 (9)%)). Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation recurred in three patients; paroxysmal atrial flutter (two patients) and atrial tachycardia (one patient) developed in the corridor in three others. Among the 31 patients in whom the operation was successful sinus node function at rest and during exercise remained undisturbed in 26 and 25 patients respectively (mean (SE) actuarial freedom of sinus node dysfunction at four years (81(7)%)). Pacemakers were needed in five (16%) of the 31 patients for insufficient sinus node rhythm at rest only. Doppler echocardiography showed maintenance of right atrial contribution to right ventricle filling in 26 of the 31 patients after operation in contrast to the left atrium, which never showed such contribution. His bundle ablation was performed and a pacemaker implanted in the five patients in whom the corridor operation was unsuccessful. CONCLUSION: These results substantiate the idea of this surgical procedure. Modification of the technique is, however, needed to achieve a reliable isolation between left atrium and corridor, which would make this experimental surgery widely applicable in the treatment of drug refractory atrial fibrillation.     

Atrial defibrillators or implantable atrioverters. Initial results

The atrial defibrillator is a new non-pharmacological treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) for restoration of sinus rhythm. This device has two programmable modes: automatic or activated by the physician or patient. In the automatic mode, the device delivers a shock synchronous with the R wave to restore sinus rhythm when AF is detected. Two patients with paroxysmal AF resistant to pharmacological therapy were included in a study to assess the efficacy and safety of the atrial defibrillator in the mode activated by the physician. The device implanted in the pectoral region is connected to 3 electrodes, two for atrial defibrillation and sensing positioned in the coronary sinus and right atrium respectively and a sensing and pacing electrode in the right ventricle. The right ventricle is paced if a post-shock pause is detected. It is possible to interrogate the device with a programmer using its Holter function and so determine the number of episodes of AF sensed and treated. The number, intensity and energy of the shocks and the parameters of ventricular stimulation are programmable. In these two patients, the atrial defibrillator effectively reduced prolonged episodes of AF with a follow-up of 12 and 7 months. No pro-arrhythmic effects were observed. Further clinical evaluation is under way to assess this new mode of treatment, including the mode activated by the patient, safety and tolerance of the shocks. In our two patients, the treatment of prolonged episodes of AF was followed by reduction of many short or asymptomatic episodes.     

Effective use of a novel rate-smoothing algorithm in atrial fibrillation by ventricular pacing

BACKGROUND: It is still unknown whether a fast heart rate or an irregular ventricular response in atrial fibrillation causes tachycardiomyopathy. Reduction in the variability of RR intervals without an increase in heart rate might be an alternative treatment when antiarrhythmic drugs fail to control the irregularity accompanying atrial fibrillation. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Eight patients underwent temporary right ventricular pacing, using a novel rate-smoothing algorithm prior to DC cardioversion or His bundle ablation. A rate-smoothing algorithm was utilized by right ventricular apical stimulation. Spontaneous and paced RR intervals during atrial fibrillation were quantified and processed for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The rate-smoothing algorithm resulted in a substantial reduction in the variance of the RR intervals (slow mode 73.1%, fast mode 40.0%) and RR range (slow mode 49.3%, fast mode 34.3%). In contrast to previous algorithms, the mean heart rate during pacing intervention in atrial fibrillation did not change significantly to the heart rate directly preceding the pacemaker intervention (+2%). CONCLUSIONS: This initial study of the novel rate-smoothing algorithm shows that pacing intervention is a relatively safe, rapid and reliable alternative therapy for controlling irregular ventricular rhythms due to atrial fibrillation. Incorporation of the algorithm in implantable pacemakers appears justified, but demands further prospective studies in patients to evaluate relief of symptoms and reduction of tachycardiomyopathy due to atrial fibrillation.     

Electrophysiological properties in patients undergoing atrial compartment operation for chronic atrial fibrillation with mitral valve disease

AIMS: Surgical treatment for atrial fibrillation is now feasible in selective cases. The aim of this study was to assess the electrophysiological properties of patients undergoing atrial compartment operation for chronic atrial fibrillation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Electrophysiological studies were performed in 20 mitral valve patients with atrial fibrillation who had been maintained in sinus rhythm for more than 1 year after atrial compartment operation. Intra-cardiac recording and programmed electrical stimulation were performed in various atrial compartments. The parameters studied included sinus node function, atrial conduction and refractoriness, atrioventricular conduction function and inducible arrhythmias if any. Intra-cardiac recordings showed that the rhythm was of sinus origin in all cases, with the earliest atrial activity located in the high right atrium. The mean sinus cycle length was 750 +/- 110 ms, AH time 106 +/- 29 ms, and HV time 53 +/- 7 ms. The sinus node function was normal in 18 patients (90%), and only two patients had prolonged sinus node recovery and sino-atrial conduction. The right atrial appendage compartment was driven by the sinus node in all patients. However, the conduction time from the high right atrium to the right atrial appendage compartment was markedly prolonged in 12 of 15 patients (80%) undergoing the three-compartment operation in which an incision was placed between the high right atrium and right atrial appendage compartments. On the other hand, the electrical activities in the left atrial compartment were much more varied. In 13 of 20 patients (65%), the left atrial compartment was driven by the sinus node; 11 of the 13 patients had a normal or mildly prolonged conduction time (ranged 75 to 146 ms), whereas two patients had a marked delay in conduction (200 ms and 266 ms, respectively). In the remaining seven patients, the left atrial compartments were dissociated from the rest of the heart; five of them had a quiescent left atrium, one a fluttering left atrial rhythm, and one a slow left atrial rhythm. The effective refractory period was longer in the left atrial compartment (242 +/- 47 ms) as compared to that of the high right atrium (224 +/- 26 ms, P < 0.01) and right atrial appendage compartments (219 +/- 25 ms, P < 0.01). Programmed electrical stimulation could not induce atrial fibrillation in any patient, whereas two patients had inducible atrial flutter and three repetitive atrial responses. CONCLUSIONS: (1) Atrial compartment operation does not impair sinus node function in most cases. (2) Elimination of atrial fibrillation while maintaining the electrical connection between different atrial compartments is feasible.     

Coronary sinus pacing prevents induction of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is due to reentry, and its incidence has been shown to decrease after dual-site atrial or biatrial pacing. We investigated whether a simpler pacing approach via the distal coronary sinus (CSd) could eliminate AF inducibility by high right atrial (HRA) extrastimuli (APDs). We based our hypothesis on our previous observation that AF inducibility by HRA APDs was associated with conduction delays to the posterior triangle of Koch, whereas AF was never induced with CSd APDs, which were associated with minimal intra-atrial conduction delays. METHODS AND RESULTS: Programmed electrical stimulation was performed from the high right atrium and CSd, and bipolar recordings were obtained from the high right atrium, His bundle, posterior triangle of Koch, and coronary sinus. In 13 patients (age, 44+/-18 years), AF was reproducibly induced with a critically timed HRA APD (220+/-22 ms) delivered during HRA pacing. AF was not induced in any of the patients when HRA APDs were delivered during CSd pacing at the same critical coupling intervals. Coronary sinus APDs delivered during HRA pacing also were not associated with AF induction. The APD coupling interval measured at the posterior triangle of Koch during CSd pacing was significantly prolonged compared with the one measured during HRA pacing and AF induction (381+/-58 versus 263+/-37 ms; P<.0001). CONCLUSIONS: We propose that CSd pacing suppresses the propensity of HRA APDs to induce AF by limiting their prematurity at the posterior triangle of Koch and not allowing local conduction delay and local reentry to occur.