Lateral Resistance of Short Single Piles and Pile Groups Located Near Slopes

Many transmission towers, high-rise buildings, and bridges are constructed near steep slopes and are supported by large-diameter piles. These structures may be subjected to large lateral loads, such as violent winds and earthquakes. Widely used types of foundations for these structures are pier foundations, which have large diameter with high stiffness. The behavior of a pier foundation subjected to lateral loads is similar to that of a short rigid pile, because both elements seem to fail by rotation developing passive resistance on opposite faces above and below the rotation point, unlike the behavior of a long flexible pile. This paper describes the results of several numerical studies performed with a three-dimensional finite-element method (FEM) of model tests and a prototype test of a laterally loaded short pile and pier foundation located near slopes, respectively. Initially, in this paper, the results of model tests of single piles and pile groups subjected to lateral loading, in homogeneous sand with 30° slopes and horizontal ground were analyzed by the three- dimensional (3D) finite-element (FE) analyses. Furthermore, field tests of a prototype pier foundation subjected to lateral loading on a 30° slope was reported. The FE analyses were conducted to simulate these results. The main purpose of this paper is the validation of the 3D elasto–plastic FEM by comparisons with the experimental data.     

Lateral Behavior of Pile Groups in Layered Soils

Assessment of the response of a laterally loaded pile group based on soil–pile interaction is presented in this paper. The behavior of a pile group in uniform and layered soil (sand and/or clay) is evaluated based on the strain wedge model approach that was developed to analyze the response of a long flexible pile under lateral loading. Accordingly, the pile’s response is characterized in terms of three-dimensional soil–pile interaction which is then transformed into its one-dimensional beam on elastic foundation equivalent and the associated parameter (modulus of subgrade reaction Es) variation along pile length. The interaction among the piles in a group is determined based on the geometry and interaction of the mobilized passive wedges of soil in front of the piles in association with the pile spacing. The overlap of shear zones among the piles in the group varies along the length of the pile and changes from one soil layer to another in the soil profile. Also, the interaction among the piles grows with the increase in lateral loading, and the increasing depth and fan angles of the developing wedges. The value of Es so determined accounts for the additional strains (i.e., stresses) in the adjacent soil due to pile interaction within the group. Based on the approach presented, the p–y curve for different piles in the pile group can be determined. The reduction in the resistance of the individual piles in the group compared to the isolated pile is governed by soil and pile properties, level of loading, and pile spacing.     

Lateral Resistance of Single Pile Located Near Geosynthetic Reinforced Slope

An extensive program of laboratory tests was carried out to study the effect of reinforcing an earth slope on the lateral behavior of a single vertical pile located near the slope. Layers of geogrid were used to reinforce a sandy slope of 1 (V):1.5 (H) made with sands of three different unit weights representing dense, medium dense, and loose relative densities. Several configurations of geogrid reinforcement with different numbers of layers, vertical spacing, and length were investigated. The experimental program also included studies of the location of pile relative to the slope crest, relative density of sand, and embedment length of pile. The results indicate that stabilizing a soil slope has a significant benefit of improving the lateral load resistance of a vertical pile. The improvement in pile lateral load was found to be strongly dependent on the number of geogrid layers, layer size, and relative density of the sand. It was also found that soil reinforcement is more effective for piles located closer to the slope crest. Based on test results, critical values are discussed and recommended.     

Pile Spacing Effects on Lateral Pile Group Behavior: Load Tests

To investigate group interaction effects as a function of pile spacing, full-scale cyclic lateral load tests were performed on pile groups in stiff clay spaced at 3.3, 4.4, and 5.65 pile diameters in the direction of loading with as many as five rows of piles. Group interaction effects decreased considerably as pile spacing increased from 3.3 to 5.65D. Lateral resistance was a function of row location in the group, rather than location within a row. For a given deflection, the leading (first) row piles carried the greatest load, while the second and third row piles carried successively smaller loads. Fourth and fifth row piles carried about the same load as the third row piles. For a given load, the maximum bending moments in the trailing row piles were greater than those in the lead row, but these effects decreased as spacing increased. Cyclic loading reduced the peak load by about 15% after 15 cycles; however, distribution of load within the pile group was essentially the same as at the peak load. Gaps significantly reduced resistance for small deflections.     

Nonlinear Efficiency of Bored Pile Group under Lateral Loading

A 3×3 bored pile group consisting of nine cast-in-drilled-hole reinforced concrete shafts and a comparable single-shaft were subjected to reversed cyclic, lateral head loading to investigate group interaction effects across a wide range of lateral displacements. The piles had the same diameter of d = 0.61?m and similar soil conditions; however, various equipment constraints led to two differences: (1) a fixed head (zero rotation) boundary condition for the single pile versus minor pile cap rotation in the vertical plane for the group and (2) shaft longitudinal reinforcement ratios of 1.8% for the single pile and 1% for the group piles. To enable comparisons between the test results, a calibrated model of the single pile (1.8% reinforcement) was developed and used to simulate the response of a single shaft with 1% reinforcement. Additional simulations of the pile group were performed to evaluate the effects of cap rotation on group response. By comparing the simulated responses for common conditions, i.e., 1% reinforcing ratio and zero head rotation, group efficiencies were found to range from unity at lateral displacements <0.004×d to 0.8 at small displacements ～ 0.01–0.02×d and up to 0.9 at failure (displacements >0.04×d). Hence, we find that group efficiency depends on the level of nonlinearity in the foundation system. The general group efficiency, although not its displacement-dependence, is captured by p-multipliers in the literature for reinforced concrete, fixed-head piles.     

Rotational Restraint of Pile Caps during Lateral Loading

A pure fixed-head (zero-rotation) condition at the top of a group of laterally loaded piles is seldom achievable in the field, even when piles are installed in a group that is “rigidly” constrained by a stiff concrete pile cap. Assuming complete fixity during design (zero rotation at the pile head) can result in underestimated values of pile-head deflection, and incorrect estimates of the magnitude and the location of maximum bending moments. A simple and practical approach is presented for estimating the moment restraint that is provided by the pile cap at the top of a pile group. The moment restraint, represented by the rotational restraint coefficient (KMθ), serves as a boundary condition for analyzing groups of laterally loaded piles. Full-scale field tests performed on two pile groups with concrete pile caps show that the proposed method for estimating rotational restraint provides results that are in good agreement with measured field performance.     

Pile Spacing Effects on Lateral Pile Group Behavior: Analysis

Using the results from three full-scale lateral pile group load tests in stiff clay with spacing ranging from 3.3 to 5.65, computer analyses were performed to back-calculate p multipliers. The p multipliers, which account for reduced resistance due to pile–soil–pile interaction, increased as pile spacing increased from 3.3 to 5.65 diameters. Extrapolation of the test results suggests that group reduction effects can be neglected for spacings greater than about 6.5 for leading row piles and 7–8 diameters for trailing row piles. Based on analysis of the full-scale test results, pile behavior can be grouped into three general categories, namely: (1) first or front row piles; (2) second row piles; and (3) third and higher row piles. p multiplier versus normalized pile spacing curves were developed for each category. The proposed curves yield p multipliers which are higher than those previously recommended by AASHTO in 2000, the US Army in 1993, and the US Navy in 1982 based on limited test data, but lower values than those proposed by Reese et al. in 1996 and Reese and Van Impe in 2001. The response (load versus deflection, maximum moment versus load, and bending moment versus depth) for each row of the pile groups computed using GROUP and Florida Pier generally correlated very well with measurements from the full-scale tests when the p multipliers developed from this test program were employed.     

Behavior of Axially Loaded Pile Groups Driven in Clayey Silt

This paper presents a case history describing measurements made during the installation and load testing of groups of five, closely spaced, precast concrete piles in a soft clay-silt. The test results extend the presently limited set of reported high-quality data for pile groups at field scale and allow assessment of the reliability of existing numerical and analytical predictive approaches. Full scale maintained compression and tension load tests on groups as well as tests on single (reference) piles and an individual test on a pile within a pile group enable the effects of multiple pile installations and interaction between piles under load to be assessed. The results are compared with existing simple methods of pile group analysis and with other case histories reporting results on small pile groups. A simple expression to evaluate pile group stiffness efficiency is proposed.     

Simplified Lateral Load Analyses of Fixed-Head Piles and Pile Groups

The characteristic load method (CLM) can be used to estimate lateral deflections and maximum bending moments in single fixed-head piles under lateral load. However, this approach is limited to cases where the lateral load on the pile top is applied at the ground surface. When the pile top is embedded, as in most piles that are capped, the additional embedment results in an increased lateral resistance. A simple approach to account for embedment effects in the CLM is presented for single fixed-head piles. In practice, fixed-head piles are more typically used in groups where the response of an individual pile can be influenced through the adjacent soil by the response of other nearby piles. This pile–soil–pile interaction results in larger deflections and moments in pile groups for the same load per pile compared to single piles. A simplified procedure to estimate group deflections and moments was also developed based on the p-multiplier approach. Group amplification factors are introduced to amplify the single pile deflection and bending moment to reflect pile–soil–pile interaction. The resulting approach lends itself well to simple spreadsheet computations and provides good agreement with other generally accepted analytical tools and with values measured in published lateral load tests on groups of fixed-head piles.     

Three-Dimensional Analysis of Lateral Pile Response using Two-Dimensional Explicit Numerical Scheme

A procedure for exploiting a two-dimensional (2D) explicit, numerical computer code for the 3D formulation of dynamic lateral soil-pile interactions is considered. The procedure is applied to two models using simultaneous computation of a series of plane strain boundary value problems, each of which represents a horizontal layer of soil. The first model disregards the shear forces developed between the horizontal layers, and may be considered as a generalized Winkler model. The second model takes account of these forces by coupling the behavior of the horizontal layers. Several verification problems for a single pile and pile groups in a homogeneous soil layer modeled as a viscoelastic material were solved and compared to known solutions in order to assess the reliability of the models. Excellent agreement was observed between results of the present analyses and existing solutions.     

Cyclic Lateral Load Behavior of a Pile Cap and Backfill

A series of static cyclic lateral load tests were performed on a full-scale 4×3 pile group driven into a cohesive soil profile. Twelve 324-mm steel pipe piles were attached to a concrete pile cap 5.18×3.05?m in plan and 1.12?m in height. Pile–soil–pile interaction and passive earth pressure provided lateral resistance. Seven lateral load tests were conducted in total; four tests with backfill compacted in front of the pile cap; two tests without backfill; and one test with a narrow trench between the pile cap and backfill soil. The formation of gaps around the piles at larger deflections reduced the pile–soil–pile interaction resulting in a degraded linear load versus deflection response that was very similar for the two tests without backfill and the trenched test. A typical nonlinear backbone curve was observed for the backfill tests. However, for deflections greater than 5 mm, the load-deflection behavior significantly changed from a concave down shape for the first cycle to a concave up shape for the second and subsequent cycles. The concave up shape continued to degrade with additional cycles past the second and typically became relatively constant after five to seven cycles. A gap formed between the backfill soil and the pile cap, which contributed to the load-deflection degradation. Crack patterns and sliding surfaces were consistent with that predicted by the log spiral theory. The results from this study indicate that passive resistance contributes considerably to the lateral resistance. However, with cyclic loading the passive force degrades significantly for deflections greater than 0.5% of the pile cap height.     

Undrained Lateral Pile Response in Sloping Ground

Three-dimensional finite element analyses were performed to study the behavior of piles in sloping ground under undrained lateral loading conditions. Piles of different diameter and length in sloping cohesive soils of different undrained shear strength and several ground slopes were considered. Based on the results of the finite element analyses, analytical formulations are derived for the ultimate load per unit length and the initial stiffness of hyperbolic p-y curves. New p-y criteria for static loading of piles in clay are proposed, which take into account the inclination of the slope and the adhesion of the pile-slope interface. These curves are used through a commercial subgrade reaction computer code to parametrically analyze the effect of slope inclination and pile adhesion on lateral displacements and bending moments. To validate the proposed p-y curves, a number of well documented lateral load tests are analyzed. Remarkable agreement is obtained between predicted and measured responses for a wide range of soil undrained shear strength and pile diameter, length, and stiffness.     

Data Reduction of Horizontal Load Full-Scale Tests on Bored Concrete Piles and Pile Groups

This paper proposes a new approach for data reduction of horizontal load full-scale tests on piles and pile groups. This approach has been developed on results from tests run on bored concrete piles embedded in homogeneous and nonhomogeneous ground. Due to nonlinear response of pile material and also to nonhomogeneous embedding ground, the problem of fitting reliable curves for representing strains along shafts is increased. It is suggested that B-splines fixed by a weighted least-squares algorithm should be used to overcome that problem. Taking advantage of the mathematical properties of B-splines, an algorithm for computing the internal force distribution amongst pile heads direct from test results is also proposed for pile groups. It is shown that the integration of the curvatures to compute pile movements should be done using natural boundary conditions instead of pile head measurements whenever possible. Despite the concrete crack, the distribution of bending moments can be computed from curvatures provided a reliable reinforced concrete model is used. Finally, it is proposed to compute the soil reactions by the integration of bending moments, solving an integral equation by again using B-spline functions.     

Lateral Resistance of Full-Scale Pile Cap with Gravel Backfill

A static lateral load test was performed on a full-scale 3×3 pile group driven in saturated low-plasticity silts and clays. The steel pipe piles were attached to a concrete pile cap which created a “fixed-head” end constraint. A gravel backfill was compacted in place on the backside of the cap. Lateral resistance was therefore provided by pile–soil–pile interaction, as well as base friction and passive pressure on the cap. In this case, passive resistance contributed about 40% of the total resistance. The log–spiral method provided the best agreement with measured resistance. Estimates of passive pressure computed using the Rankine method significantly underestimated the resistance while the Coulomb method overestimated resistance. The cap movement required to fully mobilize passive resistance in the gravel backfill was about 6% of the cap height. This is somewhat larger than reported in other studies likely due to the underlying clay layer. The p-multipliers developed for the free-head pile group provided reasonable estimates of the pile–soil–pile resistance for the fixed-head pile group once gaps adjacent to the pile were considered.     

Passive Earth Pressure Mobilization during Cyclic Loading

The passive resistance measured in a series of full-scale tests on a pile cap is compared with existing theories. Four different soils were selected as backfill in front of the pile cap and the load-deflection relationships under cyclic loading were investigated. The log spiral theory provided the best agreement with the measured passive resistance. The Rankine theory significantly underestimated the passive force, while the Coulomb theory generally overestimated the resistance. The displacement necessary to mobilize the maximum passive force was compared with previous model and full-scale tests and ranged from 3.0 to 5.2% of the cap height. A hyperbolic model provided the best agreement with the measured backbone passive resistance curve compared with recommendations given by Caltrans and the U.S. Navy. However, this model overestimated the passive resistance for cyclic loading conditions due to the formation of a gap between the pile cap and backfill soil and backfill stiffness reduction. Based on the test results, the cyclic-hyperbolic model is developed to define load-deflection relationships for both virgin and cyclic loading conditions with the presence of a gap.     

Pile Response to Lateral Spreads: Centrifuge Modeling

The paper presents results of eight centrifuge models of vertical single piles and pile groups subjected to earthquake-induced liquefaction and lateral spreading. The centrifuge experiments, conducted in a slightly inclined laminar box subjected to strong in-flight base shaking, simulate a mild, submerged, infinite ground slope containing a 6-m-thick prototype layer of liquefiable Nevada sand having a relative density of 40%. Two- and three-layer soil profiles were used in the models, with a 2-m-thick nonliquefiable stratum placed below, and in some cases also above the liquefiable Nevada sand. The model piles had an effective prototype diameter, d, of 0.6 m. The eight pile models simulated single end-bearing and floating reinforced concrete piles with and without a reinforced concrete pile cap, and two 2×2 end-bearing pile groups. Bending moments were measured by strain gauges placed along the pile models. The base shaking liquefied the sand layer and induced free field permanent lateral ground surface displacements between 0.7 and 0.9 m. In all experiments, the maximum permanent bending moments, Mmax occurred at the boundaries between liquefied and nonliquefied layers; the prototype measured values of Mmax ranged between about 10 and 300 kN?m. In most cases the bending moments first increased and then decreased during the shaking, despite the continued increase in free field displacement, indicating strain softening of the soil around the deep foundation. The largest values of Mmax were associated with single end-bearing piles in the three-layer profile, and the smallest values of Mmax were measured in the end-bearing pile groups in the two-layer profile. The companion paper further analyzes the Mmax measured in the single pile models, and uses them to calibrate two limit equilibrium methods for engineering evaluation of bending moments in the field. These two methods correspond to cases controlled, respectively, by the pressure of liquefied soil, and by the passive pressure of nonliquefied layers on the pile foundation.     

Behavior of Open- and Closed-Ended Piles Driven Into Sands

Both the driving response and static bearing capacity of open-ended piles are affected by the soil plug that forms inside the pile during pile driving. In order to investigate the effect of the soil plug on the static and dynamic response of an open-ended pile and the load capacity of pipe piles in general, field pile load tests were performed on instrumented open- and closed-ended piles driven into sand. For the open-ended pile, the soil plug length was continuously measured during pile driving, allowing calculation of the incremental filling ratio for the pile. The cumulative hammer blow count for the open-ended pile was 16% lower than for the closed-ended pile. The limit unit shaft resistance and the limit unit base resistance of the open-ended pile were 51 and 32% lower than the corresponding values for the closed-ended pile. It was also observed, for the open-ended pile, that the unit soil plug resistance was only about 28% of the unit annulus resistance, and that the average unit frictional resistance between the soil plug and the inner surface of the open-ended pile was 36% higher than its unit outside shaft resistance.     

Behavior of Step Tapered Bored Piles in Sand under Static Lateral Loading

The behavior of step tapered bored piles in sand, under static lateral loading, was examined by field tests at one site in Kuwait. A total of 14 bored piles including two instrumented piles were installed for lateral loading. The soil profile consists of medium dense sand with weak cementations and no groundwater was encountered in the boreholes. Laboratory tests were carried out to determine the basic soil characteristics and the strength parameters. Both the ultimate lateral capacity and the deflections at applied loads were examined. The results indicate increased lateral load carrying capacity and decreased deflections at different applied loads for the step tapered piles due to the enlargement or strengthening of the upper section of the piles. The advantages of using this type of pile is emphasized including the cost saving resulting from an economical design.     

Group Interaction Effects on Laterally Loaded Piles in Clay

This paper presents the results of static lateral load tests carried out on 1×2, 2×2, 1×4, and 3×3 model pile groups embedded in soft clay. Tests were carried out on piles with length to diameter ratios of 15, 30, and 40 and three to nine pile diameter spacing. The effects of pile spacing, number of piles, embedment length, and configuration on pile-group interaction were investigated. Group efficiency, critical spacing, and p multipliers were evaluated from the experimental study. The experimental results have been compared with those obtained from the program GROUP. It has been found that the lateral capacity of piles in 3×3 group at three diameter spacing is about 40% less than that of the single pile. Group interaction causes 20% increase in the maximum bending moment in piles of the groups with three diameter spacing in comparison to the single pile. Results indicate substantial difference in p multipliers of the corresponding rows of the linear and square pile groups. The predicted field group behavior is in good agreement with the actual field test results reported in the literature.     

Continuum Mechanics of Lateral Soil–Pile Interaction

A rigorous mathematical formulation is presented for a flexible tubular pile of finite length embedded in a semi-infinite soil medium under lateral loading. In the framework of three-dimensional elastostatics and classical beam theory, the complicated structure–medium interaction problem is shown to be reducible to three coupled Fredholm integral equations. Through an analysis of the associated Cauchy singular kernels, the intrinsic singular characteristics of the radial, angular, and vertical interfacial load transfers are rendered explicit and incorporated into a rigorous numerical procedure. Detailed results on the three-dimensional load–transfer process, as well as their resultant one-dimensional analogs, are also provided for benchmark comparison and practical applications.