Compatibility in immiscible polysulfone/poly(ethylene terephthalate) blends

Polysulfone (PSU)/poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) blends were obtained by direct injection molding across the composition range. Their phase behavior, thermal properties, morphology, and mechanical properties were measured. The blends were composed of a pure PSU amorphous phase and either a pure PET phase in PSU‐poor blends, or a PET‐rich phase with some dissolved PSU in PSU‐rich blends. The morphology of the dispersed phase was mostly spherical with some elongated particles in the PET‐rich blends. A slight synergistic behavior was observed in the Young's modulus, mainly in the 90/10 blend, which is probably due to orientation effects. The presence of some broken particles indicated some interfacial adhesion. The ductility values were approximately linear with composition. This was generally the case in PSU‐rich blends, and was attributed to the higher level of PSU in the PET‐rich phase. Although embrittlement was seen in blends with 30% of the second component, the ductility of the two pure components did not significantly decrease after annealing due to the presence of low amounts (up to 10%) of another component of the blend. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 93: 2193–2200, 2004     

Blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) and poly(butylene terephthalate)

Commercial grade poly(ethylene terephthalate), (PET, intrinsic viscosity = 0.80 dL/g) and poly(butylene terephthalate), (PBT, intrinsic viscosity = 1.00 dL/g) were melt blended over the entire composition range using a counterrotating twin‐screw extruder. The mechanical, thermal, electrical, and rheological properties of the blends were studied. All of the blends showed higher impact properties than that of PET or PBT. The 50:50 blend composition exhibited the highest impact value. Other mechanical properties also showed similar trends for blends of this composition. The addition of PBT increased the processability of PET. Differential scanning calorimetry data showed the presence of both phases. For all blends, only a single glass‐transition temperature was observed. The melting characteristics of one phase were influenced by the presence of the other. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 98: 75–82, 2005     

Rheological and thermal properties of blends of modified poly(ethylene terephthalate) with p‐acetoxybenzoic acid and poly(butylene terephthalate)

Blending of thermotropic liquid crystalline polyesters (LCPs) with conventional polymers could result in materials that can be used as an alternative for short fiber‐reinforced thermoplastic composites, because of their low melt viscosity as well as their inherent high stiffness and strength, high use temperature, and excellent chemical resistance and low coefficient of expansion. In most of the blends was used LCP of 40 mol % of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and 60 mol % of p‐acetoxybenzoic acid (PABA). In this work, blends of several copolyesters having various PABA compositions from 10 to 70 mol % and poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) were prepared and their rheological and thermal properties were investigated. For convenience, the copolyesters were designated as PETA‐x, where x is the mol % of PABA. It was found that PET‐60 and PET‐70 copolyesters decreased the melt viscosity of PBT in the blends and those PBT/PETA‐60 and PBT/PETA‐70 blends showed different melt viscosity behaviors with the change in shear rate, while blends of PBT and PET‐x having less than 50 mol % of PABA exhibited totally different rheological behaviors. The blends of PBT with PETA‐50, PETA‐60, and PETA‐70 showed the morphology of multiple layers of fibers. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 74: 1797–1806, 1999     

Rheological properties in blends of poly(aryl ether ether ketone) and liquid crystalline poly(aryl ether ketone)

Rheological properties of the blends of poly(aryl ether ether ketone) (PEEK) with liquid crystalline poly(aryl ether ketone) containing substituted 3‐trifluoromethylbenzene side group (F‐PAEK), prepared by solution precipitation, have been investigated by rheometer. Dynamic rheological behaviors of the blends under the oscillatory shear mode are strongly dependent on blend composition. For PEEK‐rich blends, the systems show flow curves similar to those of the pure PEEK, i.e., dynamic storage modulus G′ is larger than dynamic loss modulus G″, showing the feature of elastic fluid. For F‐PAEK‐rich systems, the rheological behavior of the blends has a resemblance to pure F‐PAEK, i.e., G″ is greater than G′, showing the characteristic of viscous fluid. When the PEEK content is in the range of 50–70%, the blends exhibit an unusual rheological behavior, which is the result of phase inversion between the two components. Moreover, as a whole, the complex viscosity values of the blends are between those of two pure polymers and decrease with increasing F‐PAEK content. However, at 50% weight fraction of PEEK, the viscosity‐composition curves exhibit a local maximum, which may be mainly attributed to the phase separation of two components at such a composition. The changes of G′ and G″ with composition show a trend similar to that of complex viscosity. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 102: 4040–4044, 2006     

Solid‐State Structure and Mechanical Properties of Blends of an Amorphous Polyamide and a Poly(amino‐ether) Resin

Summary: Finely dispersed blends of an amorphous polyamide (AP) and a poly(amino‐ether) (PAE) resin were obtained by direct injection moulding. The blend components reacted slightly, mainly in PAE‐rich compositions, as seen by torque increases and FT‐IR. Both negative volumes of mixing and preferential orientation were observed in blends with very high AP contents, leading to synergisms in both the modulus of elasticity and the yield stress. In PAE‐rich blends, the effects of these two structural characteristics were negative, but the higher presence of reacted products also led to an overall synergistic modulus of elasticity. With the exception of blends very rich in PAE, in which the more extensive reactions led to brittle materials, the reactions compatibilized the blends due to the presence of small amounts of reacted copolymers, probably at the interface.

Cryogenically fractured surface of the skin of the AP/PAE 80/20 w/w blend.     

Poly(ether ether ketone)/poly(aryl ether sulfone) blends: Relationships between morphology and mechanical properties

Mechanical properties such as the tensile modulus, yield (break) strength, and elongation to break (or yield) are measured for multiphase poly(ether ether ketone) (PEEK)/poly(aryl ether sulfone) (PES) blends. Specimens with three different levels of thermal histories (quenched, as‐molded, and annealed) are prepared in order to study their effects on the mechanical properties of PEEK/PES blends. Synergistic behavior is observed in the tensile modulus and tensile strength of the blends in almost the whole range of compositions. The ductility of quenched blends measured as the elongation to break (yield) shows an unexpected synergistic behavior in the blend containing 90 wt % PEEK, although a negative deviation from additive behavior is observed in the rest of the compositions. A ductile–brittle transition is observed between 50 and 75 wt % PEEK in the blend. The ductile–brittle transition in as‐molded blends shifts to 75–90 wt % PEEK. Annealed blends show predominantly brittle behavior in the whole composition range. The experimental data are further correlated with the theoretically predicted results based on various composite models. Although the prediction based on these equations fails to fit the experimental data in the whole composition range, the simplex equations that are normally used for blends showing synergistic behavior produced a reasonable fit to the experimental data. The mechanical properties obtained for different blend compositions are further correlated with their morphology as observed by scanning electron microscopy. Morphological observation shows a two‐phase morphology in PES‐rich blends, which is an interlocked morphology in which the disperse phase is not clearly visible in PEEK‐rich blends, and a cocontinuous type of morphology for a 50/50 composition. Considerable permanent deformation of both the disperse and matrix phase, especially in the case of quenched tensile specimens, demonstrates the remarkable adhesion present between the two phases. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 2887–2905, 2003     

Structure and mechanical properties of blends of poly(ε‐caprolactone) with a poly(amino ether)

Poly(ε‐caprolactone) (PCL)/poly(amino ether) (PAE) blends were obtained by injection molding without any previous extrusion step in an attempt to (i) contribute to the knowledge of the relation between structure and mechanical properties in these type of blends composed of a rubbery and a glassy polymer and (ii) to find out to which extent are the PCL/PAE blends compatible, and therefore whether the biodegradability of PCL can be added as a characteristic of PAE‐based applications. PCL/PAE blends are composed of a crystalline PCL phase, a pure amorphous PCL phase, and a PAE‐rich phase where some PCL is present. The presence of some dissolved and probably unreacted PCL in the PAE‐rich phase led to a low interfacial tension as observed by the small size of the dispersed particles and the large interfacial area. The dependence on composition of both the modulus of elasticity and the yield stress of the blends was parallel to that of the orientation level. The elongation at break showed values similar to those of PAE in PAE‐rich blends, and was slightly synergistic in very rich PCL compositions; this behavior reflects a change in the nature of the matrix, from glassy to rubbery. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Polysulphone and poly(phenylene sulphide) blends: 2. Mechanical behaviour

This paper reports the mechanical behaviour of injection moulded blends of polysulphone (PSF) and poly(phenylene sulphide) (PPS). The blends prepared by melt-extrusion and subsequent injection moulding are phase separated. Depending on moulding conditions, thermal history, and composition, tensile behaviour ranged from brittle to ductile, with or without cold drawing. Cold drawing was observed in compositions as-moulded with up to 50% by weight PPS. Upon annealing for 2h at 160°C, ductile failure was maintained for blends containing up to 35% by weight PPS. All other compositions failed in brittle fashion. Flexural strength and modulus, before and after annealing, exhibited negative deviation from the rule of mixtures. All the blends were found to be notch sensitive.     

Study of the miscibility and crystallization behavior of poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(vinyl alcohol) blends

The miscibility and crystallization behavior of poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(vinyl alcohol) (PEO/PVA) blends were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), and polarizing optical microscopy. Because the glass‐transition temperature of PVA was near the melting point of PEO crystalline, an uncommon DSC procedure was used to determine the glass‐transition temperature of the PVA‐rich phase. From the DSC and DMA results, two glass‐transition temperatures, which corresponded to the PEO‐rich phase and the PVA‐rich phase, were observed. It was an important criterion to indicate that a blend was immiscible. It was also found that the preparation method of samples influenced the morphology and crystallization behaviors of PEO/PVA blends. The domain size of the disperse phase (PVA‐rich) for the solution‐cast blends was much larger than that for the coprecipitated blends. The crystallinity, spherulitic morphology, and isothermal crystallization behavior of PEO in the solution‐cast blends were similar to those of the neat PEO. On the contrary, these properties in the coprecipitated blends were different from those of the neat PEO. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 92: 1562–1568, 2004     

Properties of uncompatibilized and compatibilized poly(butylene terephthalate)–LLDPE blends

In this work, blends of poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) and linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE) were prepared. LLDPE was used as an impact modifier. Since the system was found to be incompatible, compatibilization was sought for by the addition of the following two types of functionalized polyethylene: ethylene vinylacetate copolymer (EVA) and maleic anhydride‐grafted EVA copolymer (EVA‐g‐MAH). The effects of the compatibilizers on the rheological and mechanical properties of the blends have been also quantitatively investigated. The impact strength of the PBT–LLDPE binary blends slightly increased at a lower concentration of LLDPE but increased remarkably above a concentration of 60 wt % of LLDPE. The morphology of the blends showed that the LLDPE particles had dispersed in the PBT matrix below 40 wt % of LLDPE, while, at 60 wt % of LLDPE, a co‐continuous morphology was obtained, which could explain the increase of the impact strength of the blend. Generally, the mechanical strength was decreased by adding LLDPE to PBT. Addition of EVA or EVA‐g‐MAH as a compatibilizer to PBT–LLDPE (70/30) blend considerably improved the impact strength of the blend without significantly sacrificing the tensile and the flexural strength. More improvement in those mechanical properties was observed in the case of the EVA‐g‐MAH system than for the EVA system. A larger viscosity increase was also observed in the case of the EVA‐g‐MAH than EVA. This may be due to interaction of the EVA‐g‐MAH with PBT. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 72: 989–997, 1999     

Rheological properties and morphology of compatibilized poly(butylene terephthalate)/linear low‐density polyethylene alloy

The rheological behavior of PBT/LLDPE and PBT/LLDPE‐g‐AA blends [where PBT is poly(butylene terephthalate), LLDPE is linear low‐density polyethylene, and AA is acrylic acid] under a capillary flow was investigated with a capillary rheometer. The Utracki equation was used to describe the viscosity–composition dependence of PBT/LLDPE and PBT/LLDPE‐g‐AA blends at low shear stresses. However, at high shear stresses, this equation was not suitable for these blending systems. There existed a maximum on the curves of the entrance pressure drop versus the blending compositions, and the interlayer slip factor β in the Utracki equation was related not only to the shear stress but also to the elasticity difference of the two blending components. Morphological observations indicated that at high shear rates, there existed two different morphologies at different positions of the extrudates, and this was the reason that the Utracki equation failed. Near the wall of the capillary, low‐viscosity PBT stratified, and this resulted in an additional decrease in the viscosities of the blending systems. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 88: 206–213, 2003     

Influence of the degree of grafting on the morphology and mechanical properties of blends of poly(butylene terephthalate) and glycidyl methacrylate grafted poly(ethylene‐co‐propylene) (EPR)

Poly(ethylene‐co‐propylene) (EPR) was functionalized to varying degrees with glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) by melt grafting processes. The EPR‐graft‐GMA elastomers were used to toughen poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT). Results showed that the grafting degree strongly influenced the morphology and mechanical properties of PBT/EPR‐graft‐GMA blends. Compatibilization reactions between the carboxyl and/or hydroxyl of PBT and epoxy groups of EPR‐graft‐GMA induced smaller dispersed phase sizes and uniform dispersed phase distributions. However, higher degrees of grafting (>1.3) and dispersed phase contents (>10 wt%) led to higher viscosities and severe crosslinking reactions in PBT/EPR‐graft‐GMA blends, resulting in larger dispersed domains of PBT blends. Consistent with the change in morphology, the impact strength of the PBT blends increased with the increase in EPR‐graft‐GMA degrees of grafting for the same dispersion phase content when the degree of grafting was below 1.8. However, PBT/EPR‐graft‐GMA1.8 displayed much lower impact strength in the ductile region than a comparable PBT/EPR‐graft‐GMA1.3 blend (1.3 indicates degree of grafting). Morphology and mechanical results showed that EPR‐graft‐GMA 1.3 was more suitable in improving the toughness of PBT. SEM results showed that the shear yielding properties of the PBT matrix and cavitation of rubber particles were major toughening mechanisms. Copyright © 2006 Society of Chemical Industry     

Polymer blends of poly(trimethylene terephthalate) and polystyrene compatibilized by styrene‐glycidyl methacrylate copolymers

The compatibilizing effects of styrene‐glycidyl methacrylate (SG) copolymers with various glycidyl methyacrylate (GMA) contents on immiscible blends of poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) and polystyrene (PS) were investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and ¹³C‐solid‐state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The epoxy functional groups in the SG copolymer were able to react with the PTT end groups (? COOH or ? OH) to form SG‐g‐PTT copolymers during melt processing. These in situ–formed graft copolymers tended to reside along the interface to reduce the interfacial tension and to increase the interfacial adhesion. The compatibilized PTT/PS blend possessed a smaller phase domain, higher viscosity, and better tensile properties than did the corresponding uncompatibilized blend. For all compositions, about 5% GMA in SG copolymer was found to be the optimum content to produce the best compatibilization of the blend. This study demonstrated that SG copolymers can be used efficiently in compatibilizing polymer blends of PTT and PS. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 88: 2247–2252, 2003     

A comparative study of poly(l‐lactide)‐block‐poly(ϵ‐caprolactone) six‐armed star diblock copolymers and polylactide/poly(ϵ‐caprolactone) blends

This paper deals with the synthesis of a series of six‐armed star diblock copolymers based on poly(l ‐lactide) (PLLA) and poly(?‐caprolactone) (PCL) by ring‐opening polymerization using stannous octoate as catalyst and the preparation of polylactide (PLA)/PCL linear blends using a solution blending technique, while keeping the PLA‐to‐PCL ratio comparable in both systems. The thermal, rheological and mechanical properties of the copolymers and the blends were comparatively studied. The melting point and the degree of crystallinity were found to be lower for the copolymers than the blends due to poor folding property of star copolymers. Dynamic rheology revealed that the star polymers have lower elastic modulus, storage modulus and viscosity as compared to the corresponding blends with similar composition. The blends show two‐phase dispersed morphology whereas the copolymers exhibited microphase separated morphology with elongated (worm‐like) microdomains. The crystalline structures of the copolymers were characterized by larger crystallites than their blend counterparts, as estimated using Sherrer's equation based on wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction data. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry     

Synthesis of functionalized copolymers and their compatibilization effects on acrylonitrile butadiene styrene/poly(butylene terephthalate) blends

In this study, the copolymers of methyl methacrylate-co-glycidyl methacrylate (MGD) with different epoxy contents and molecular weights, the styrene-co-glycidyl methacrylate (SGD) and methyl methacrylate-co-maleic anhydride (MAD) were synthesized. The synthesized copolymers, styrene-co-maleic anhydride (SMA) and styrene-acrylonitrile-co-glycidyl methacrylate (SAG) were used as compatibilizers to enhance the impact strength of the acrylonitrile butadiene styrene/poly(butylene terephthalate) (ABS/PBT). The effects of differences in the structure, reactive group type, and molecular weight of the compatibilizers on the mechanical properties, phase morphology, melt viscosity, thermal stability, and melting temperature of the blend were studied. The results showed that functionalized copolymers were successfully synthesized with high monomer conversions. Addition of the functionalized copolymers increased melt viscosity but did not considerably affect thermal stability, tensile strength, flexural strength and melting temperature of the ABS/PBT blends. The compatibilizers improved the dispersion of the PBT phase and prevented brittle fracture, thereby increasing the impact strength of the blend. Among the studied compositions, the ABS/PBT/MGD-5 blend exhibited the highest impact strength of 25.8 kJ/m² and an appropriate melt flow index of 19.1 g/10 minutes. The compatibilizer should have an appropriate molecular weight to improve the interface bonding force. Regarding the melting viscosity, the reactive group content and compatibilizer dosage should be adjusted to ensure high impact strength.     

Crystallization and melting behavior of poly(ether ether ketone)/poly(aryl ether sulfone) blends

The crystallization and melting behavior of poly(ether ether ketone) (PEEK) in blends with poly(aryl ether sulfone) (PES) prepared by melt mixing are investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and wide‐angle X‐ray scattering (WAXS). The presence of PES is found to have a notable influence on the crystallization behavior of PEEK, especially when present in low concentrations in the PEEK/PES blends. The PEEK crystallization kinetics is retarded in the presence of PES from the melt and in the rubbery state. An analysis of the melt crystallization exotherm shows a slower rate of nucleation and a wider crystallite size distribution of PEEK in the presence of PES, except at low concentrations of PES, where, because of higher miscibility and the tendency of PES to form ordered structures under suitable conditions, a significantly opposite result is observed. The cold crystallization temperature of the blends at low PES concentration is higher then that of pure PEEK, whereas at a higher PES concentration little change is observed. In addition, the decrease in heat of cold crystallization and melting, which is more prevalent in PEEK‐rich compositions than in pure PEEK, shows the reduction in the degree of crystallinity because of the dilution effect of PES. Isothermal cold crystallization studies show that the cold crystallization from the amorphous glass occurs in two stages, corresponding to the mobilization of the PEEK‐rich and PES‐rich phases. The slower rate of crystallization of the PEEK‐rich phase, even in compositions where a pure PEEK phase is observed, indicates that the presence of the immobile PES‐rich phase has a constraining influence on the crystallization of the PEEK‐rich phase, possibly because of the distribution of individual PEEK chains across the two phases. The various crystallization parameters obtained from WAXS analysis show that the basic crystal structure of PEEK remains unaffected in the blend. Further, the slight melting point depression of PEEK at low concentrations of PES, apart from several other morphological reasons, may be due to some specific interactions between the component homopolymers. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 2906–2918, 2003     

Melting,crystallization behaviors,and nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of PET/PTT/PBT ternary blends

The melting, crystallization behaviors, and nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of the ternary blends composed of poly(ethylene terephthalate), poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) and poly(buthylene terephthalate) (PBT) were studied with differential scanning calorimeter (DSC). PBT content in all ternary blends was settled invariably to be one‐third, which improved the melt‐crystallization temperature of the ternary blends. All of the blend compositions in amorphous state were miscible as evidenced by a single, composition‐dependent glass transition temperature (T_g) observed in DSC curves. DSC melting thermograms of different blends showed different multiple melting and crystallization peaks because of their various polymer contents. During melt‐crystallization process, three components in blends crystallized simultaneously to form mixed crystals or separated crystals depending upon their content ratio. The Avrami equation modified by Jeziorny and the Ozawa theory were employed to describe the nonisothermal crystallization process of two selected ternary blends. The results spoke that the Avrami equation was successful in describing the nonisothermal crystallization process of the ternary blends. The values of the t_1/2 and the parameters Z_c showed that the crystallization rate of the ternary blends with more poly(ethylene terephthalate) content was faster than that with the lesser one at a given cooling rate. The crystal morphology of the five ternary blends investigated by polarized optical microscopy (POM) showed different size and distortional Maltese crosses or light spots when the PTT or poly(ethylene terephthalate) component varied, suggesting that the more the PTT content, the larger crystallites formed in ternary blends. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2007     

Synthesis and characterization of poly[(butylene succinate)‐co‐(butylene terephthalate)]‐b‐poly(tetramethylene glycol) segmented block copolymer

Polyester‐polyether segmented block copolymers of poly[(butylene succinate)‐co‐poly(butylene terephthalate)] (PBS–PBT) and poly(tetramethylene glycol) (PTMG) (M_n = 2000) with various compositions were synthesized. PBT content in the PBS was adjusted to ca. 5 mol %. Their thermal and mechanical properties were investigated. In the case of copolymer, the melting point of the PBS–PBT control was 107.8°C, and the melting point of the copolymer containing 70 wt % of PTMG was 70.1°C. Crystallinity of soft segment was 5 ∼ 17%, and that of hard segment was 42 ∼ 59%. The breaking stress of the PBS–PTMG control was 47 MPa but it decreased with increasing PTMG content. In the case of copolymer containing 70 wt % of PTMG, breaking stress was 36 MPa. Contrary to the decreasing breaking stress, breaking strain increased from 300% for PBS–PBT control to 900% for a copolymer containing 70 wt % of PTMG. The shape recovery ratios of the copolymer containing 70 wt % PTMG were almost twice of those of copolymers containing 40 wt % PTMG. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 79: 2067–2075, 2001     

Rheological behavior of polyester blend and mechanical properties of the polypropylene–polyester blend fibers

The article deals with method of preparation, rheological properties, phase structure, and morphology of binary blend of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)/poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) and ternary blends of polypropylene (PP)/(PET/PBT). The ternary blend of PET/PBT (PES) containing 30 wt % of PP is used as a final polymer additive (FPA) for blending with PP and subsequent spinning. In addition commercial montane (polyester) wax Licowax E (LiE) was used as a compatibilizer for spinning process enhancement. The PP/PES blend fibers containing 8 wt % of polyester as dispersed phase were prepared in a two‐step procedure: preparation of FPA using laboratory twin‐screw extruder and spinning of the PP/PES blend fibers after blending PP and FPA, using a laboratory spinning equipment. DSC analysis was used for investigation of the phase structure of the PES components and selected blends. Finally, the mechanical properties of the blend fibers were analyzed. It has been found that viscosity of the PET/PBT blends is strongly influenced by the presence of the major component. In addition, the major component suppresses crystallinity of the minor component phase up to a concentration of 30 wt %. PBT as major component in dispersed PES phase increases viscosity of the PET/PBT blend melts and increases the tensile strength of the PP/PES blend fibers. The impact of the compatibilizer on the uniformity of phase dispersion of PP/PES blend fibers was demonstrated. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 102: 4222–4227, 2006     

Reactive compatibilization of poly(butylene terephthalate)/low‐density polyethylene and poly(butylene terephthalate)/ethylene propylene diene rubber blends with a bismaleimide

The reactive compatibilization effect of a small molecule, bismaleimide (BMI), on poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT)/low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) and PBT/ethylene propylene diene (EPDM) rubber blends were investigated. All the blends were prepared by melt blending in the mixing chamber of a Haake Rheocord. The particle size of dispersed phase was reduced by >ten times by adding 1.2 wt % of BMI as observed with scanning electron microscopy. The torque‐time curve recorded during mixing showed that the addition of BMI leads to a significant increase in the viscosity of PBT, LDPE, EPDM, and the blends. This indicates that a chemical reaction has taken place. It was confirmed that free radicals are involved in the reactions because the addition of a stabilizer to the blends has removed all the compatibilizing effect, and the torque‐time curve does not show any increase in viscosity. A possible mechanism of compatibilization is proposed. The shear forces during melt mixing cause the rupture of chemical bond in the polymers, which form macroradicals of PBT, LDPE, or EPDM. These macroradicals react with BMI to form PBT‐BMI‐LDPE or PBT‐BMI‐EPDM copolymers. These in situ‐formed copolymers act as compatibilizers to give a significant refinement of the blend morphology. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 71: 2049–2057, 1999