Glass transition behavior and miscibility in blends of poly(vinyl p-phenol) with two homologous aliphatic polyesters

New miscible blend systems comprised of poly(4-vinyl phenol) (PVPh) and a homologous series of polyesters of different CH₂/CO ratios (from 4.5 to 7) was discovered. Miscibility has been confirmed using differential scanning calorimetry, Fourier-transformed infrared spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. The PVPh/polyesters blends investigated exhibited a single composition-dependent glass transition and homogeneous phase morphology, and they similarly exhibited a cusp in the T_g-composition relationships. This work further extended the range of aliphatic polyesters that are known to be miscible with PVPh. The Flory-Huggins interaction parameter (χ₁₂) or energy density (B) obtained from analysis of melting point depression for PVPh/PEAz and PVPh/PHS blends are of negative values. More interestingly, the specific interactions in the PVPh/polyester blends change with the corresponding different structures in the polyester component. For the PVPh/PHS blend whose polyester constituent possesses a lower carbonyl density in the main chain (average CH₂/CO ratio=7), the energy density B was found to be −1.17 cal cm⁻³. This value is significantly lower than those for either the PVPh/PEAz (CH₂/CO=4.5) blend system (B=−7.72 cal cm⁻³). Miscibility, specific interactions, and peculiar T_g-composition relationships in the blends of PVPh with selected homologous polyesters are discussed.     

The totally miscible in ternary hydrogen‐bonded polymer blend of poly(vinyl phenol)/phenoxy/phenolic

The individual binary polymer blends of phenolic/phenoxy, phenolic/poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh), and phenoxy/PVPh have specific interaction through intermolecular hydrogen bonding of hydroxyl–hydroxyl group to form homogeneous miscible phase. In addition, the miscibility and hydrogen bonding behaviors of ternary hydrogen bond blends of phenolic/phenoxy/PVPh were investigated by using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and optical microscopy. According to the DSC analysis, every composition of the ternary blend shows single glass transition temperature (T_g), indicating that this ternary hydrogen‐bonded blend is totally miscible. The interassociation equilibrium constant between each binary blend was calculated from the appropriate model compounds. The interassociation equilibrium constant (K_A) of each individually binary blend is higher than any self‐association equilibrium constant (K_B), resulting in the hydroxyl group tending to form interassociation hydrogen bond. Photographs of optical microscopy show this ternary blend possess lower critical solution temperature (LCST) phase diagram. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Crystallization kinetics of poly(trimethylene terephthalate)/poly(ether imide) blends

The crystallization kinetics of a melt‐miscible blend, consisting of poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) and poly(ether imide) (PEI) prepared by solution precipitation, has been investigated by means of optical polarized microscopy and differential scanning calorimeter. It was found that both the PTT spherulitic growth rate (G) and overall crystallization rate constant (k_n) were depressed, with increasing PEI composition or crystallization temperature (T_c). The kinetic retardation was attributed to the decrease in PTT molecular mobility, and the dilution of PTT concentration due to the addition of PEI, which has a higher glass transition temperature (T_g). According to the Lauritzen–Hoffman theory of secondary nucleation, the crystallization of PTT in blends was similar to that of neat PTT as regime III, n = 4 and regime II, n = 2 growth processes, while the transition point of regime III to II has been shifted from 194°C for neat PTT to 190°C for blends. POLYM. ENG. SCI. 46:89–96, 2006. © 2005 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Reexamination of the miscibility of stereoregular poly(methyl methacrylate) with poly(vinyl phenol)

Previously, isotactic, atactic, and syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylates) (PMMAs) (designated as iPMMA, aPMMA, and sPMMA) were mixed with poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) separately in tetrahydrofuran (THF) to make three polymer blend systems. According to calorimetry data, iPMMA was found to be miscible with PVPh; however, partial miscibility or immiscibility was found between aPMMA (or sPMMA) and PVPh. According to the article by C. J. T. Landry and D. M. Teegarden, Macromolecules, 1991, 24, 4310, THF is the reason for causing aPMMA and PVPh to phase separate, but 2‐butanone instead produces miscible blends. Therefore, in this article these three polymer systems were investigated again using 2‐butanone as solvent. Films were prepared under specific conditions to minimize the effect of aggregation in PMMA. The formation of hydrogen bonding between PMMA and PVPh and the attendant changes in the aggregation of PMMA segments were determined in the solid states by means of FTIR. Based on the results of calorimetry, iPMMA and aPMMA were found to be miscible with PVPh. For iPMMA/PVPh blends, different degrees of hydrogen bonding were observed based on DSC data and FTIR spectra when compared to previous study. An elevation of the glass transition temperatures (T_gs) of aPMMA/PVPh blends above weight average was detected and the T_g values were fitted well by the Kwei equation. But partial miscibility was still found between sPMMA and PVPh on account of the observation of two T_gs in most compositions. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 83: 1425–1431, 2002     

Miscibility enhancement on the immiscible poly (vinyl pyrrolidone) and poly (ethyl methacrylate) with poly (vinyl phenol)

The miscibility behavior of ternary blends of poly (vinyl phenol) (PVPh)/poly (vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP)/poly (ethyl methacrylate) (PEMA) was investigated mainly with calorimetry. PVPh is miscible with both PVP and PEMA on the basis of the single T_g observed over the entire composition range. FTIR was used to study the hydrogen bonding interaction between the hydroxyl group of PVPh and the carbonyl group of PVP and PEMA at various compositions. Furthermore, the addition of PVPh is able to enhance the miscibility of the immiscible PVP/PEMA and eventually transforms it into a miscible blend, especially when the ratio between PVP/PEMA is 3:1, probably because of favorable physical interaction. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 1205–1213, 2006     

Miscible blends containing bacterial poly(3‐hydroxyvalerate) and poly(p‐vinyl phenol)

The miscibility of poly(3‐hydroxyvalerate) (PHV)/poly(p‐vinyl phenol) (PVPh) blends has been studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The blends are miscible as shown by the existence of a single glass transition temperature (T_g) and a depression of the equilibrium melting temperature of PHV in each blend. The interaction parameter was found to be −1.2 based on the analysis of melting point depression data using the Nishi–Wang equation. Hydrogen‐bonding interactions exist between the carbonyl groups of PHV and the hydroxyl groups of PVPh as evidenced by FTIR spectra. The crystallization of PHV is significantly hindered by the addition of PVPh. The addition of 50 wt % PVPh can totally prevent PHV from cold crystallization. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 74: 383–388, 1999     

Effect of the tacticity of poly(methyl methacrylate) on the phase diagram of its ternary blends

Previously, isotactic and atactic poly(methyl methacrylates) (PMMAs) were found to be miscible with poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) and poly(hydroxy ether of bisphenol‐A) (phenoxy) because all the prepared films were transparent and showed composition‐dependent glass transition temperatures (T_g's). However, syndiotactic PMMA was immiscible with PVPh because most of the cast films had two T_g's. On the contrary, syndiotactic PMMA was still miscible with phenoxy. According to our preliminary results, PVPh and phenoxy are not miscible. Also to our knowledge, nobody has reported any results concerning the effect of the tacticity of PMMA on its ternary blend containing PVPh and phenoxy. The miscibility of a ternary blend consisting of PVPh, phenoxy, and tactic PMMA was thus investigated and reported in this article. Calorimetry was used as the principal tool to study miscibility. An approximate phase diagram of the ternary blends containing different tactic PMMA was established, probably for the first time, based on differential scanning calorimetry data. Immiscibility was found in most of the studied ternaries but a slight difference due to the effect of tacticity of PMMA was definitely observed. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 86: 2720–2726, 2002     

Miscibility and crystallization kinetics of poly(trimethylene terephthalate)/amorphous poly(ethylene terephthalate) blends

The miscibility and crystallization kinetics of the blends of poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) and amorphous poly(ethylene terephthalate) (aPET) have been investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and polarized optical microscopy (POM). It was found that PTT/aPET blends were miscible in the melt. Thus, the single glass transition temperature (T_g) of the blends within the whole composition range and the retardation of crystallization kinetics of PTT in blends suggested that PTT and aPET were totally miscible. The nucleation density of PTT spherulites, the spherulitic growth, and overall crystallization rates were depressed upon blending with aPET. The depression in nucleation density of PTT spherulites could be attributed to the equilibrium melting point depression, while the depression in the spherulitic growth and overall crystallization rates could be mainly attributed to the reduction of PTT chain mobility and dilution of PTT upon mixing with aPET. The underlying nucleation mechanism and growth geometry of PTT crystals were not affected by blending, from the results of Avrami analysis. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 47:2005–2011, 2007. © 2007 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Binary and ternary polymer blends containing poly(vinylidene chloride‐co‐acrylonitrile)

Poly(vinylidene chloride‐co‐acrylonitrile) (Saran F), poly(hydroxy ether of bisphenol A) (phenoxy), poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (PSAN), and poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) all have the same characteristic: miscibility with atactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (aPMMA). However, the miscibility of Saran F with the other polymer (phenoxy, PSAN, or PVPh) is not guaranteed and was thus investigated. Saran F was found to be miscible only with PSAN but not miscible with phenoxy and PVPh. Because Saran F and PVPh are not miscible, although they are both miscible with aPMMA, aPMMA can thus be used as a potential cosolvent to homogenize PVPh/Saran F. The second part of this report focused on the miscibility of a ternary blend consisting of Saran F, PVPh, and aPMMA to investigate the cosolvent effect of aPMMA. Factors affecting the miscibility were studied. The established phase diagram indicated that the ternary blends with high PVPh/Saran F weight ratio were found to be mostly immiscible. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 91: 3068–3073, 2004     

Crystallization behavior of PEO in blends of poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(2‐vinyl pyridine)‐b‐(ethylene oxide) block copolymer

The crystallization behavior of two molecular weight poly(ethylene oxide)s (PEO) and their blends with the block copolymer poly(2‐vinyl pyridine)‐b‐poly(ethylene oxide) (P2VP‐b‐PEO) was investigated by polarized optical microscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, differential scanning calorimetry, and atomic force microscopy (AFM). A sharp decreasing of the spherulite growth rate was observed with the increasing of the copolymer content in the blend. The addition of P2VP‐b‐PEO to PEO increases the degradation temperature becoming the thermal stability of the blend very similar to that of the block copolymer P2VP‐b‐PEO. Glass transition temperatures, T_g, for PEO/P2VP‐b‐PEO blends were intermediate between those of the pure components and the value increased as the content of PEO homopolymer decreased in the blend. AFM images showed spherulites with lamellar crystal morphology for the homopolymer PEO. Lamellar crystal morphology with sheaf‐like lamellar arrangement was observed for 80 wt% PEO(200M) and a lamellar crystal morphology with grain aggregation was observed for 50 and 20 wt% blends. The isothermal crystallization kinetics of PEO was progressively retarded as the copolymer content in the blend increased, since the copolymer hinders the molecular mobility in the miscible amorphous phase. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2012. © 2011 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Lamellar morphology of poly(trimethylene terephthalate)/poly(ether imide) blends studied via small‐angle X‐ray scattering

The lamellar morphology of a melt‐miscible blend consisting of poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) and poly(ether imide) (PEI) prepared by solution precipitation has been investigated by means of optical polarized microscopy (POM) and small angle X‐ray scattering (SAXS). From the observation under POM, it was suggested that PEI was predominantly segregated into the interlamellar and/or interfibrillar regions upon PTT crystallization since the PTT spherulitic morphologies of blends were volume‐filling. From results of SAXS data analysis, a larger amorphous layer thickness was identified in the blends, showing that some PEI was incorporated inside the interlamellar regions after crystallization. Despite the swelling of the amorphous layer, the amorphous layer thickness was relatively independent of the blend composition. It was concluded that amorphous PEI was located in the interlamellar regions of PTT as the weight fraction of PEI (w_PEI) [≤] 0.1, while amorphous PEI was predominantly segregated into the interfibrillar regions of PTT as w_PEI > 0.1, and the extent of interfibrillar segregation increased with increasing w_PEI. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2006     

Effect of thermal treatments on the miscibility of poly(vinyl cinnamate) binary blends

Poly(vinyl cinnamate) (PVCN) could undergo thermal or photo crosslinking. PVCN was previously found to be miscible with poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) [also named poly(hydroxystyrene)]. In this article, the miscibility between PVCN with or without thermal crosslinking and poly(styrene‐co‐hydrostyrene) (designated as MPS) was investigated. PVCN was determined to be miscible with MPS with 15% of hydroxystyrene (MPS‐15) at two compositions but partially miscible or immiscible at PVCN/MPS‐15(50/50) composition. For MPS with 5% of hydroxystyrene (MPS‐5), two T_g values were detected indicating mostly immiscibility. However, PVCN after thermal crosslinking was determined to be miscible with both MPS‐5 and MPS‐15. Immiscibility was found between thermally crosslinked PVCN and PVPh different from miscibility in the original PVCN/PVPh blends. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Correlation between interactions, miscibility, and spherulite growth in crystalline/crystalline blends of poly(ethylene oxide) and polyesters

Crystalline/crystalline blend systems of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and a homologous series of polyesters, from poly(ethylene adipate) to poly(hexamethylene sebacate), of different CH₂/CO ratios (from 3.0 to 7.0) were examined. Correlation between interactions, miscibility, and spherulite growth rate was discussed. Owing to proximity of blend constituents' T_g's, the miscibility in the crystalline/crystalline blends was mainly justified by thermodynamic and kinetic evidence extracted from characterization of the PEO crystals grown from mixtures of PEO and polyesters at melt state. By overcoming experimental difficulty in assessing the phase behavior of two crystalline polymers with closely spaced T_g's, this work has further extended the range of polyesters that can be miscible with PEO. The interaction parameters (χ₁₂) for miscible blends of PEO with polyesters [poly(ethylene adipate), poly(propylene adipate), poly(butylene adipate), and poly(ethylene azelate) with CH₂/CO = 3.0-4.5] are all negative but the values vary with the polyester structures, with a maximum for the blend of PEO/poly(propylene adipate) (CH₂/CO = 3.5). The values of interactions are apparently dependent on the structures of the polyester constituent in the blends; interaction strength for the miscible PEO/polyester systems correlate in the same trend with the PEO crystal growth rates in the blends.     

Miscibility and melting behavior of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(trimethylene terephthalate) blends

The miscibility and melting behavior of binary crystalline blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)/poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) have been investigated with differential scanning calorimetry and scanning electron microscope. The blends exhibit a single composition‐dependent glass transition temperature (T_g) and the measured T_g fit well with the predicted T_g value by the Fox equation and Gordon‐Taylor equation. In addition to that, a single composition‐dependent cold crystallization temperature (T_cc) value can be observed and it decreases nearly linearly with the low T_g component, PTT, which can also be taken as a valid supportive evidence for miscibility. The SEM graphs showed complete homogeneity in the fractured surfaces of the quenched PET/PTT blends, which provided morphology evidence of a total miscibility of PET/PTT blend in amorphous state at all compositions. The polymer–polymer interaction parameter, χ₁₂, calculated from equilibrium melting temperature depression of the PET component was ?0.1634, revealing miscibility of PET/PTT blends in the melting state. The melting crystallization temperature (T_mc) of the blends decreased with an increase of the minor component and the 50/50 sample showed the lowest T_mc value, which is also related to its miscible nature in the melting state. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Miscibility and phase behavior of poly(D,L-lactide)/poly(p-vinylphenol) blends

The miscibility of poly(D ,L -lactide) (PDLLA) and poly(p-vinylphenol) (PVPh) blends has been studied by differential scanning calorimetry and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Phase separation was observed in blends over a wide composition range. A PDLLA-rich phase was found to coexist with an almost pure PVPh phase. The quenched blend samples showed two glass transitions (T_gs), except for a blend with a low PVPh content. However, the T_g value of the PDLLA-rich phase showed a gradual increase with increasing PVPh content. No evidence of interassociation (hydrogen bond formation) between PDLLA and PVPh was found by FTIR. The phase behavior of the blends was simulated using an association model. The results suggested that the equilibrium constant of interassociation between PDLLA and PVPh was small. The phase compositions of the two separated phases were calculated using Fox, Gordon-Taylor, and Couchman equations. The amount of PVPh in the PDLLA-rich phase increased with increasing PVPh content in the blend. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 70: 811–816, 1998     

Glass‐transition and melting behavior of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) blends

The glass‐transition temperatures and melting behaviors of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) (PET/PEN) blends were studied. Two blend systems were used for this work, with PET and PEN of different grades. It was found that T_g increases almost linearly with blend composition. Both the Gibbs–DiMarzio equation and the Fox equation fit experimental data very well, indicating copolymer‐like behavior of the blend systems. Multiple melting peaks were observed for all blend samples as well as for PET and PEN. The equilibrium melting point was obtained using the Hoffman–Weeks method. The melting points of PET and PEN were depressed as a result of the formation of miscible blends and copolymers. The Flory–Huggins theory was used to study the melting‐point depression for the blend system, and the Nishi–Wang equation was used to calculate the interaction parameter (χ₁₂). The calculated χ₁₂ is a small negative number, indicating the formation of thermodynamically stable, miscible blends. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 81: 11–22, 2001     

Thermal properties and non‐isothermal crystallization behavior of poly(trimethylene terephthalate)/poly(lactic acid) blends

Thermal properties and non‐isothermal melt‐crystallization behavior of poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT)/poly(lactic acid) (PLA) blends were investigated using differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetric analysis. The blends exhibit single and composition‐dependent glass transition temperature, cold crystallization temperature (T_cc) and melt crystallization peak temperature (T_mc) over the entire composition range, implying miscibility between the PLA and PTT components. The T_cc values of PTT/PLA blends increase, while the T_mc values decrease with increasing PLA content, suggesting that the cold crystallization and melt crystallization of PTT are retarded by the addition of PLA. The modified Avrami model is satisfactory in describing the non‐isothermal melt crystallization of the blends, whereas the Ozawa method is not applicable to the blends. The estimated Avrami exponent of the PTT/PLA blends ranges from 3.25 to 4.11, implying that the non‐isothermal crystallization follows a spherulitic‐like crystal growth combined with a complicated growth form. The PTT/PLA blends generally exhibit inferior crystallization rate and superior activation energy compared to pure PTT at the same cooling rate. The greater the PLA content in the PTT/PLA blends, the lower the crystallization rate and the higher the activation energy. Moreover, the introduction of PTT into PLA leads to an increase in the thermal stability behavior of the resulting PTT/PLA blends. Copyright © 2011 Society of Chemical Industry     

Polymorphic and miscibility behavior in crystalline/crystalline blends of poly(pentamethylene terephthalate) with poly(heptamethylene terephthalate)

BACKGROUND: The phase behavior of blends of semicrystalline aryl polyesters with long methylene segments (? (CH₂)_n? with n = 5 or 7) in the repeat units has not been much studied. Thus, crystalline/crystalline blends comprising monomorphic poly(pentamethylene terephthalate) (PPT) and polymorphic poly(heptamethylene terephthalate) (PHepT) were prepared and the crystal growth kinetics, polymorphism behavior and miscibility in this blend system were probed using polarized‐light optical microscopy, differential scanning calorimetry and wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction. RESULTS: The PPT/PHepT blends of all compositions were first proven to be miscible in the melt state or quenched amorphous phase, whose interaction strength was determined (χ₁₂ = ? 0.35), showing favorable interactions and phase homogeneity. Although the spherulites of neat PPT and PHepT could exhibit ring bands at different crystallization temperature (T_c) ranges (100–110 and 50–65 °C, respectively), the spherulites of PPT/PHepT (50/50) blend became ringless in the range 50–110 °C. Growth analysis and polymorphic behavior in the crystalline phases of the blends provided extra evidence for the miscibility between these two crystalline polymers. Spherulitic growth rates of PPT in the PPT/PHepT blends were significantly reduced in comparison with those of neat PPT. In addition, miscible blending of a small fraction of monomorphic PPT (20 wt%) with polymorphic PHepT altered the crystal stability and led to the originally polymorphic PHepT exhibiting only the β‐crystal form when melt‐crystallized at all values of T_c. CONCLUSION: The highly intimate mixing in polymer chains of crystalline PPT and PHepT causes significant disruption in ring‐band patterns and reduction in crystallization rates of PPT as well as alteration in the polymorphic behavior of PHepT. Copyright © 2009 Society of Chemical Industry     

Crystallization, hydrolytic degradation, and mechanical properties of poly (trimethylene terephthalate)/poly(lactic acid) blends

Crystallization, melting, hydrolytic degradation, and mechanical properties of poly(trimentylene terephthalate)/poly(lactic acid) (PTT/PLA) blends have been investigated. The blends show a single and composition-dependent glass-transition temperature (T _g) over the entire composition range, implying that these blends are fully miscible in the amorphous state. The observed T _g is found to increase with increasing PLA content and fitted well with the Gordon–Taylor equation, with the fitting parameter k being 0.91. The cold-crystallization peak temperature increases, while the melt-crystallization peak decreases with increasing the PLA content. Both the pure PTT and PTT/PLA blends cannot accomplish the crystallization during the cooling procedure and the recrystallization occurs again on the second heating. Therefore, on the thermogram recorded, there is exothermal peak followed by endothermal peak with a shoulder. However, to pure PLA, no crystallization takes place during cooling from the melt, therefore, no melting endothermic peak is found on the second heating curve. WAXD analysis indicates PLA and PTT components do not co-crystallize and the crystalline phase of the blends is that of their enriched pure component. With increasing PLA content, the hydrolytic degradation of the blend films increases, while both the tensile strength and the elongation at break of the blend films decrease. That is to say, the hydrolytic degradation of the PTT/PLA blends increases with the introduction of PLA at the cost of the decrease of the flexibility of PTT.     

Morphology and spherulitic growth kinetics in poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(n‐butyl methacrylate) blends

Results of a study concerning the morphology and the spherulite growth rates of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) in binary blends with poly(n‐butyl methacrylate) (PnBMA) are reported. Microscopic observations show that blending causes the spherulite structure to become coarser and less birefringent and confirms that the spherulitic growth rates of PEO were reduced by the addition of PnBMA. X‐ray diffraction studies show no change in the unit cell dimensions and a decrease in the degree of crystallinity upon blending. Analysis of the spherulite radial growth rate data by using Lauritzen–Hoffman theory indicates that crystallization in the range of 300 to 330 K occurs solely within regime III. The calculated surface free energy of folding, σ_e, for pure PEO is 57 erg cm^?2 and decreases with increasing the content of PnBMA in the blend. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry