Structure and properties of amorphous polyamide/liquid crystalline polyester blends

Amorphous polyamide (AP)/liquid crystalline polyester (VA) blends were obtained by extrusion‐injection molding (EI) throughout the whole composition range. The phase behavior, chemical nature and morphology of the blends were studied, and the mechanical properties discussed and compared with those of the 10 and 30% VA blends obtained by direct injection molding (DI). The blends showed two almost pure slightly reacted amorphous phases. The apparently higher reaction level of the EI blends, although small, led to a more homogeneous, fine and fibrillated morphology, attributed to a lower interfacial tension. Significant synergisms in the modulus of elasticity (up to 25%) and in the tensile strength (up to 40%) were seen in EI blends. The similar values of both specific volume and orientation in the blends and in the pure components suggest that the contribution to the modulus of the dispersed VA rigid particles is greater than that due to the proportion of VA in the blend. The 10% VA DI blend showed a similar behavior in these two properties, indicating that the DI procedure is preferred, provided that only stress‐related properties are sought. At 30% VA content, the moduli of elasticity were similar by the two molding processes, but the clearly lower tensile strength and lower ductility of the easier DI procedure, means that the more complex, but more effective, EI procedure is the one of choice for high performance materials.     

Effects of compatibilizers on the properties of polyamide/polypropylene blends

Compatibilization of polyamide 6/isotactic polypropylene blends was investigated by mechanical, morphological, thermal, and rheometrical methods. The primary objective was to obtain blends combining the desirable properties of the two components. Four compatibilizers including maleic anhydride, fumaric acid, or glycidyl functionalities were applied at two concentrations (5 and 10%). Maleic anhydride grafted styrene-ethylene-butylene-styrene block copolymer (SEBS-g-MAH) was observed to give excellent mechanical properties, especially at high polyamide/polypropylene ratios. The correlation between morphology and mechanical and rheological properties is discussed, and the interesting effect of blending on the kinetics of crystallization is noted.     

Mechanical properties and morphology of liquid crystalline copolyester-amide and amorphous polyamide blends

Blends of an amorphous polyamide (PA) and a liquid crystalline copolyesteramide (LCP), poly(naphthoate-aminophenoterephthalate) were prepared in a twin-screw extruder. Specimens for mechanical testing were prepared by injection molding. Morphological, thermal, mechanical, and rheological properties were investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), X-ray diffractometry, capillary rheometry, and a tensile tester, respectively. The tensile mechanical behavior of the LCP/PA blends was found to be affected by their compositions and specimen thickness. Tensile testing revealed that the tensile mechanical behavior of the LCP/PA blends was very similar to that of polymeric composite and the tensile strength of the LCP/PA (50/50) blend was approximately two times of the value of PA homopolymer and exceeded that of pure LCP. The morphology of the LCP/PA blends was also found to be affected by their compositions. SEM studies revealed that the liquid crystalline polymer (LCP) formed finely dispersed spherical domains in the PA matrix and the inclusions were deformed into fibrils from the spherical droplets with increasing LCP content. It has been found that droplet and fiber formations lead to low and high strength material, respectively. In particular, at specific LCP content (50 wt%), the tensile strength of the LCP/PA blend exceeded that of pure LCP. The improvement in tensile properties is likely due to the reinforcement of the PA matrix by the fibrous LCP phase as observed by SEM. A distinct shell-core morphology was found to develop in the injection molded samples of these blends. This is believed to have a synergistic effect on the tensile properties of the LCP/PA blends. The rheological behavior of the LCP/PA blends was found to be very different from that of the parent polymers and significant viscosity reductions were observed for the LCP/PA (50/50) blend. Based upon DSC, these blends have shown to be incompatible in the entire range of concentrations.     

Oxazoline‐containing compatibilizers for polyamide/SAN and polyamide/ABS blends

Polyamide (PA) and acrylonitrile/butadiene/styrene copolymer (ABS) may appear as a mixture in the recycled plastic stream. The incompatibility of these blends results in a blend with poor mechanical properties. The aim of this work is to partially convert the nitrile groups of the acrylonitrile/styrene copolymer (SAN) into oxazoline groups by reaction with aminoethanol (AE). Such modified SAN (SAN‐m) can react with the amine or carboxylic acid end groups of PA, and therefore used as compatibilizers for blends of PA with ABS. SAN‐m was found to reduce the SAN‐domain size in the PA/SAN‐blends. The initial acrylonitrile content of SAN‐m had a strong influence on the degree of conversion into oxazoline groups and on the compatibilizing effect. Mechanical properties of SAN‐m compatibilized PA/ABS blends were investigated. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 86: 449–455, 2002     

Influence of compatibilizers on mechanical properties,crystallization, and morphology of polypropylene/scrap rubber dust blends

Polypropylene blends containing a dispersed phase of scrap rubber dusts obtained from sport shoes manufacture; midsole (M, vulcanized EVA foam) and outsole (O, vulcanized rubber blend of NR, SBR, and BR) were studied. The influence of various compatibilizers on the mechanical properties of these blends were investigated. Significant development of impact strength was attained by using 6 and 10 phr of styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene (SEBS) and maleic anhydride‐grafted styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene (SEBS‐g‐MA) as compatibilizers for both compounds filled with midsole and outsole dusts. The tensile strength of each compound was slightly decreased when the compatibilizer loading increased, whereas the elongation at break was significantly increased. The enhancements of the impact strength and the elongation at break are believed to arise from reduction of interfacial tension between two phases of the rubber and the PP, which results in some reduction of the particle size of the fillers. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) confirmed the evidence of the reduction of scrap rubber dust into small rubber particle sizes in the compound, and also showed the occurrence of some fibrils. Optical microscopy (crossed polars) observations suggested that the addition of the rubber dust resulted in a less regular spherulite texture and less sharp spherulite boundaries. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 86: 148–159, 2002     

相容剂对NBR/PP共混型TPE的影响

研究了4种增容剂,氯化聚乙烯（CPE）,高氯化聚乙烯,马来酸酐接枝聚丙烯（MP）和氯化丙烯（CPP）对丁腈橡胶／聚丙烯（NBR／PP）共混型热塑性弹性体（TPE）物理机械性能的影响,结查表明,CPP是NBR／PP的理想增容剂,当CPP用量为6份时,NBR／PP共混体体系具有优良的热塑性,拉伸强度13．8MPa,扯断伸长度290％,压缩永久变形32％,共混物的相容性与透射电镜的分析结果一致。     

Influence of compatibilizers on NBR/PP blends

研究了4种增容剂氯化聚乙烯（CPE）、高氯化聚乙烯、马来酸酐接枝聚丙烯(MP)和氯化聚丙烯(CPP)对丁腈橡胶/聚丙烯(NBR/PP)共混型热塑性弹性体(TPE)物理机械性能的影响。结果表明,CPP是NBR/PP的理想增容剂,当CPP用量为6份时,NBR/PP共混体系具有优良的热塑性,拉伸强度13.8MPa,扯断伸长率290％,压缩永久变形32％。共混物的相容性与透射电镜的分析结果一致。     

Synthesis and properties of reactively compatibilized polyester and polyamide blends

The functionalization of poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) has been accomplished in a twin screw extruder by grafting maleic anhydride (MA) using a free radical polymerization technique. The resulting PBT‐g‐MA was successfully used as a compatibilizer for the binary blends of polyester (PBT) and polyamide (PA66). Enhanced mechanical properties were achieved for the blend containing a small amount (as low as 2.5 %) of PBT‐g‐MA compared to the binary blend of unmodified PBT with PA66. Loss and storage moduli for blends containing compatibilizer were higher than those of uncompatibilized blends or their respective polymers. The grafting and compatibilization reactions were confirmed using FTIR and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy. The properties of these blends were studied in detail by varying the amount of compatibilizer, and the improved mechanical behaviour was correlated with the morphology with the help of scanning electron microscopy. Morphology studies also revealed the interfacial interaction in the blend containing grafted PBT. The improvement in the properties of these blends can be attributed to the effective interaction of grafted maleic anhydride groups with the amino group in PA66. The results indicate that PBT‐g‐MA acts as an effective compatibilizer for the immiscible blends of PBT and PA66. © 2000 Society of Chemical Industry     

Effects of viscosity ratio and compatibilizers on the morphology and mechanical properties of polycarbonate/acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene blends

A comprehensive experimental study was carried out to investigate the effects of (1) viscosity ratio, (2) temperature on the viscosity ratio, (3) extruder screw location, and (4) compatibilizers on the morphology of bisphenol-A-polycarbonate/acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (PC/ABS). Blends were prepared by utilizing a co-rotating twin screw extruder and in-situ morphology obtained via the screw pullout technique. A plot of the PC/ABS viscosity ratio, η_PC/η_ABS, versus the shear rate showed a gradual rise in the curve up to a critical shear rate and thereafter displayed asymptotic character. Contrary to premise, η_PC/η_ABS decreased with increasing temperature. This was elucidated by the melt viscosity of PC being thermally more sensitive than ABS over the temperature range investigated. As expected, the plot of the average domain size versus the viscosity ratio gave a concave up curve with a minimum when the viscosity ratio was close to unity. The morphology evolution along the screw of a twin screw extruder was examined. When sections of the kneading block were examined, the minor phase domains gradually showed reduction in size toward the extruder die, and the samllest domain was realized at the end of the block, namely, the flow impeding left-handed screw element. Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) exhibited the greatest ABS domain size reduction, and annealed samples showed that it suppressed coalescence.     

Effects of compatibilizer precursors on the barrier properties and morphology of polyethylene/polyamide blends

Summary A systematic investigation on the effects of type of compatibilizer precursors (CP) upon the barrier properties and morphology of PE/PA blends was reported. Three alkyl carboxyl-substituted polyolefins were selected to modify PA in a twin screw extruder by reactive extrusion process. The barrier property of the modified PA (MPA) was better than pure PA, and the amount of barrier improvement of the blend of PE and MPA dependended significantly on the barrier property of the MPA prepared. The extent of mixing PE and MPA before blow-molding has a significant effect on its corresponding barrier properties. Further analysis of the fracture surfaces indicated that a more demarcated laminar structure of MPA dispersed in PE matrix is essential for better barrier properties of PE/MPA blends. It is not completely clear how the type of CP added affects the barrier properties of MPAs. However, it is suggested that long PA sequence with shorter grafted CP chain and high normalized grafting efficiency of MPA are essential for preparing a clear laminar structure of MPA, and a good barrier properties of PE/MPA blends.     

Novel nanostructured polyamide 6/fluoroelastomer thermoplastic elastomeric blends: Influence of interaction and morphology on physical properties

Novel polyamide 6 (PA6)/fluoroelastomer nanostructured thermoplastic elastomeric blends were developed in the present work. The influence of interaction between the components and morphology on physical properties of the blends was analyzed. Scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy studies, solubility and theoretical analysis of complex modulus clearly indicated that PA6 was the continuous matrix in which fluorocarbon elastomer was present in nanoscale. Low torque ratio (0.34) of rubber/plastic, high mixing speed and long mixing time had an important role in developing the nanostructured morphology of the blend. Tensile strength of the thermoplastic elastomer was about 39.0 MPa which was much higher than that reported earlier and showed significant improvement with increasing PA6 content. Large shifting of the glass transition temperature of the rubber and the plastic phases towards the lower temperature compared to those pristine polymers was also observed. The above properties were explained with the help of interaction between the components and morphology.     

Characterization and properties of polyphthalamide/polyamide blends and polyphthalamide/polyamide/polyolefin blends

Polyphthalamide(PPA)/polyamide(PA) blends were analyzed to determine the effect of PA addition to PPA on melting point, glass transition temperature, dynamic modulus, and heat distortion temperature. Results indicate that the choice of PPA and the choice of PA for the blend systems affects not only the above properties but also the miscibility of the blend systems. In general, PA addition to PPA lowers the melting point and glass transition, which potentially makes these blend materials easier to process. Also, the PPA/PA blends were observed to have dynamic modulus curves with transitions shifted to lower temperatures and crystalline plateaus shifted to lower modulus. PPA/PA/polyolefin(PP) systems were investigated to determine if a useful balance of properties could be obtained, even though the blend components would have to be processed at unusually high processing temperatures (in excess of 320°C). Morphological characterization indicates that small dispersed domains of PP are obtained. The modifiers utilized in these systems were either found at the interface of the PP domain or dispersed within the PP domain. The properties of PPA/PA/PP blends indicates that these systems are ductile and have a good balance of strength, stiffness, impact, and thermal performance.     

Effects of addition of acrylic compatibilizer on the morphology and mechanical behavior of amorphous polyamide/SAN blends

Amorphous polyamide (aPA)/acrylonitrile‐styrene copolymer (SAN) blends were prepared using methyl methacrylate‐maleic anhydride copolymer MMA‐MA as compatibilizer. The aPA/SAN blends can be considered as a less complex version of the aPA/ABS (acrylonitrilebutadiene‐styrene) blends, due to the absence of the ABS rubber phase in the SAN material. It is known that acrylic copolymer might be miscible with SAN, whereas the maleic anhydride groups from MMA‐MA can react in situ with the amine end groups of aPA during melt blending. As a result, it is possible the in situ formation of aPA‐g‐MMA‐MA grafted copolymers at the aPA/SAN interface during the melt processing of the blends. In this study, the MA content in the MMA‐MA copolymer and its molecular weight was varied independently and their effects on the blend morphology and stress–strain behavior were evaluated. The morphology of the blends aPA/SAN showed a minimum in the SAN particle size at low amounts of MA in the compatibilizer, however, as the MA content in the MMA‐MA copolymer was increased larger SAN particle sizes were observed in the systems. In addition, higher MA content in the compatibilizer lead to less ductile aPA/SAN blends under tensile testing. The results shown the viscosity ratio also plays a very important role in the morphology formation and consequently on the properties of the aPA/SAN blends studied. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

Structure and mechanical properties of blends of an amorphous polyamide and an amorphous copolyester

This article deals with the structure and mechanical properties of blends of an amorphous copolyester (PCTG) and an amorphous polyamide (aPA) which were directly prepared during the plasticization step of an injection molding process. The blends were composed by an almost pure aPA phase, and a PCTG‐rich phase where some aPA subparticles are present. The morphology of the blends showed both rather fine dispersed particles and occasionally large particles with occluded subparticles. This complex morphology indicated a low interface tension attributed to the presence of some aPA in the PCTG‐rich phase of the blends. The almost linear behavior of the modulus of elasticity was attributed to the constancy of the main structural characteristics upon blending and the equally linear ductility to the good adhesion level and the presence of thin and elongated morphologies. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014 , 131, 40785.     

Reactively compatibilised polyamide6/ethylene-co-vinyl acetate blends: mechanical properties and morphology

Mechanical properties and morphological studies of compatibilised blends of PA6/EVA-g-MA and PA6/EVA/EVA-g-MA were studied as functions of maleic anhydride content (MA) and dispersed phase (EVA-g-MA) concentrations, respectively at blending composition of 20 wt% dispersed phase (EVA-g-MA or combination of EVA and EVA-g-MA). The maleic anhydride (MA) was varied from 1 to 6 wt% in the PA6/EVA-g-MA blend, whereas MA concentration was fixed at 2 wt% in the ternary compositions with varying level of EVA-g-MA. ATR-IR spectroscopy revealed the formation of in situ copolymer during reactive compatibilisation of PA6 and EVA-g-MA. It was found that notched Izod impact strength of PA6/EVA-g-MA blends increased significantly with MA content in EVA-g-MA. The brittle to tough transition temperature of reactively compatibilised blends was found to be at 23 °C. The impact fractured surface topology reveals extensive deformation in presence of EVA-g-MA whereas; uncompatibilised PA6/EVA blend shows dislodging of EVA domains from the matrix. Tensile strength of the PA6/EVA-g-MA blends increased significantly as compared to PA6/EVA blends. Analysis of the tensile data using predictive theories showed an enhanced interaction of the dispersed phase and the matrix. It is observed from the phase morphological analysis that the average domain size of the PA6/EVA-g-MA blends is found to decrease gradually with increase in MA content of EVA-g-MA. A similar decrease is also found to observe in PA6/EVA/EVA-g-MA blends with increase in EVA-g-MA content, which suggest the coalescence process is slower in presence of EVA-g-MA. An attempt has been made to correlate between impact strength and morphological parameters with regard to the compatibilised system over the uncompatibilised system.     

Reactively formed block and graft copolymers as compatibilizers for polyamide 66/PS blends

Phthalic anhydride terminated polystyrene (PS-An) and styrene-maleic anhydride copolymer (SMA) were compared as a compatibilizer at low loadings (<10 wt%) in 70/30 polyamide 66 (PA66)/polystyrene (PS) blends. Compatibilization efficiency was judged by morphology of the blends and the extent of interfacial coupling to copolymer. Fluorescent labels of functional PS's (anthracene and pyrene for PS-An and SMA, respectively) allowed the detection of small amounts of reactively formed block (PA66-b-PS) or graft copolymer (SMA-g-PA66) in the blends via gel permeation chromatography with a fluorescence detector. Extremely fast reactions giving >60% conversion in 0.5 min mixing were observed regardless of the molecular weight, the structure, and the amount of the functional PS's. Interfacial stability of the reactively formed copolymers was estimated by micelle formation in the bulk phases and the interfacial coverage, Σ. PS-An with higher molecular weight (37 kg/mol) was most effective as a compatibilizer at the interface, showing less tendency to form microemulsions by suppressing interfacial roughening. However, a large portion of PA66-b-PS from low molecular weight PS-An (10 kg/mol) and SMA-g-PA66 from random functional SMA (16 kg/mol) migrated to the bulk phase to form micelles even at <2 wt% loadings. Blends of PA66 with syndiotactic PS compatibilized with PS-An gave very similar morphology to the PA66/PS blends indicating that these conclusions apply also to PA66/sPS blends.     

Influence of properties and morphology of elastomeric phase on the behavior of ternary reactive blends of polyamide 6/rigid polymer/elastomer

A ternary blend of the PA6 matrix with a finely dispersed rigid polymer and elastomer is a system with well‐balanced mechanical properties. Its micromechanical behavior, especially that of the elastomer phase, apparently differs from corresponding binary mixtures. This study shows the influence of the elastomer type, modulus, and reactivity on the behavior of ternary blends in comparison with analogous binary PA6/elastomer combinations. The presence of rigid reactive poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride) (SMA) enhanced the properties of all the systems studied. For nonreactive elastomers, the dominant effect was refinement of their size due to enhanced viscosity, whereas for functionalized low‐modulus elastomers, the very good balance of properties was due to synergistic influences of both finely dispersed phases. Of interest is the enhanced toughness of ternary blends also for more rigid elastomers having a low toughening efficiency in binary blends. An appropriate addition of rigid SMA together with an elastomer enhances the energy absorption of the matrix, probably without cavitation of very small elastomer particles. Of importance also is the simultaneous strain‐hardening effect of deformed rigid particles. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 89: 3647–3651, 2003     

Gelatinized starch/biodegradable polyester blends: Processing,morphology, and properties

Blends of polycaprolactone (PCL)/gelatinized starch and polybutylene succinate adipate/gelatinized starch have been prepared in various ratios and their phase morphology and thermal/mechanical properties have been analyzed. For both the PCL/plasticized starch and polybutylene succinate adipate/plasticized starch blends the resistance to impact increased with increasing polyester content, and the tensile modulus reached a maximum at around 80 wt % polyester content. In blends containing up to 70 wt % polyester (as observed by scanning electron microscopy) a hierarchical dispersion of the gelatinized starch phase was observed (distinct domain sizes of those less than 5 μm and those greater than 15 μm) and in the blends containing 70–90 wt % polyester a more singular dispersed phase of gelatinized starch was observed within the polyester matrix. Dynamical mechanical analysis results showed some phase mixing was present in the PCL/gelatinized starch blends noted by the appearance of an additional tan δ peak located between the glass transition temperatures of the respective components and broadening of the low temperature transition corresponding to the T_g of the polyester (possibly the result of a starch‐rich polyester phase) with some overlap with the low temperature β transition of the gelatinized starch itself. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 103: 802–811, 2007     

Influence of different compatibilizers on the morphology and properties of PA6/PET/glass fiber composites

Three kinds of compatibilizers, ethylene–ethyl acrylate copolymer (EEA), ethylene–ethyl acrylate–glycidyl methacrylate copolymer (EAG), and ethene–maleic anhydride–glycidyl methacrylate copolymer (EMG), were introduced to PA6/PET/GF blends for the first time to study the effect of different compatibilizers on composite. EEA, EAG, and EMG showed different effect on the properties of PA6/PET/GF blends. An observation of the GF–resin interface by scanning electronic microscope indicated EAG and EMG enhanced the adhesion of resin to GF, while EEA exhibited no improvement. Differential scanning calorimetry analysis showed that both EMG and EAG increased the degree of crystallinity of the PA6/PET/GF blends, whereas EEA declined. According to dynamic mechanical analysis, EAG, and EMG remarkably increased the storage modulus of composites. For the composites at a given GF content of 30 wt %, EMG increased the tensile strength from 140.6 to 156.3 MPa. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018 , 135, 46429.     

Rheology and morphology of polyester/thermoplastic flour blends

Two maize flours (standard and waxy grades) were plasticized in an internal mixer with a constant amount of water and two glycerol contents. The resulting thermoplastic flours (TPFs) were characterized in dynamic oscillatory shear and creep/recovery rheometry. They displayed two different behaviors: the viscoelastic behavior of a high‐molecular‐weight polymer for the first one and a gel‐like behavior for the second one. The TPFs were then mixed with a copolyester [poly(butylene adipate–terephtalate)]. All of the blends contained the same volume fractions and were prepared with the same mixing conditions. The morphology and rheological behavior of each blend were characterized. Different morphologies, ranging from cocontinuous to nodular, were observed. In fixed mixing conditions, the blend morphology was shown to be governed by the rheological behavior of the starchy phase and the plasticizer content. The gel‐like behavior of the second TPF seemed to prevent droplet coalescence; this led to a very fine dispersion. The rheological behavior of each blend appeared to be linked to both the morphology and the rheological behavior of the two phases. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014 , 131, 40222.