共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 62 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
影响啤酒风味物质简述 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
影响啤酒风味的物质可分为醇、酯、碳基化合物、酸、含硫化合物、胺(挥发性)和酚基化合物等。产生这种物质主要来源是麦芽、谷物辅料、酒花、酵母的发酵等。主要阐述了由于发酵作用而产生的影响啤酒风味的形成机理。双乙酰也是影响酒风味的重要原因之一。 相似文献
4.
影响啤酒风味的物质可分为:醇、酯、羰基化合物、酸、含硫化合物、胺(挥发性)和酚基化合物等,而来源于产生于这种物质主要是:麦芽、谷物辅料、酒花、酵母的发酵等,这里主要阐述由于发酵作用而产生的影响啤酒风味的形成机理,当然双乙酸也是影响啤酒风味的重要原因之一。 相似文献
5.
6.
7.
浅谈啤酒酿造过程中的风味物质 总被引:7,自引:1,他引:6
麦汁经过发酵,其主要代跚产物是乙醇和二氧化碳,同时还产生了一系列代谢副产物。这些副产物,虽然比例很小,除去少量异味外,却是构成啤酒风味不呵缺少的物质。但是这些微量物质超过一定范围,也会造成啤酒口味上的缺陷。啤酒酿造者要掌握好这些不同风味阈值的微量成分,在其共同作用下,必将呈现使人们乐于接受的良好啤酒风格。 相似文献
8.
9.
10.
11.
挥发性硫化合物对食品中的特征风味或异味的产生具有重要的影响。该文综述了食品中挥发性硫化物的主要结构类型、性质、生成路径、提取方法和分析检测技术及其感官特性,为食品的风味特性、异味的研究及硫化物的深度开发利用提供参考。 相似文献
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
多酚物质对啤酒稳定性的影响主要表现在它的氧化还原性及与蛋白质结合能力上,啤酒的混浊主要为多酚及氧化产物与蛋白质的聚合物;所以多酚是影响啤酒的非生物稳定性的主要物质之一。另一方面多酚物质又是构成啤酒风味的主要物质,它具有氧化还原性直接影响啤酒的风味稳定性。提出了合理控制多酚物质的手段。 相似文献
17.
茅台啤酒风味物质超临界萃取GC-MS分析研究 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
采用超临界萃取,以气相色谱-质谱法对茅台啤酒的风味物质进行定性分析.从茅台啤酒的超临界萃取物中分离了43种成分,鉴定了其中的36种成分,其相对含量占总离子峰的90.51%.结果表明,醇类和含羰基化合物是构成茅台啤酒风味的主要物质,其中醇类物质的相对含量高达56.529%,并以丙三醇的相对含量最高,达24.235%;而含羰基化合物的相对含量达44.219%,其中以有机酸类的相对含量最高,为19.228%. 相似文献
18.
Aroma compounds of the eight Malatya apricot cultivars, six cultivars grown in the same breeding conditions from different locations and one hybrid cultivar were determined using SPME-GC-MS technique. In general, total concentration (sum of identified and unidentified peaks) of aroma compounds in Malatya apricot cultivars were lower than those others. Total concentration of aroma compounds were found to be in the range of 514 and 6232 μg/kg fresh weight. The main volatiles of apricot cultivars were aldehydes, alcohols, acetates, esters, terpenes and acids. Among these compounds; ethanol, hexanal, hexyl acetate, (Z)-3-hexenyl acetate, (E)-2-hexenyl acetate, 1-hexanol, (Z)-3-hexenol and (E)-2-hexen-1-ol, were present in all cultivars studied at certain levels. 相似文献
19.
Rocío Fernández‐Vázquez Carla M. Stinco Dolores Hernanz Francisco J. Heredia Isabel M. Vicario 《International Journal of Food Science & Technology》2013,48(9):1861-1867
This study was aimed to analyse the impact of the debittering process (DP) in the overall sensory properties of orange juice (OJ) (Citrus sinensis L. Var. Salustiana). The fresh industrial squeezed orange juice (FOJ) and the corresponding OJ after the DP (DOJ) were taken. No significant differences were found in acidity, pH and total soluble solids. Colour was evaluated by image analysis (DigiEye System). Hue and lightness were lower (more reddish and darker) after debittering (P < 0.001). Odour profile (limonene, α‐pinene, ethyl butanoate, octanal, linalool, citral and terpineol) decreased significantly (from 16% to 61% on average) as well as total phenolic compounds measured by Folin–Ciocalteu (P < 0.05). The influence of the debittering on the perceived colour, smell and taste was evaluated by paired comparison tests. The naïve panellists found significant differences not only in taste but also in colour and aroma between FOJ and DOJ; however, preference was not clear. 相似文献
20.
Thermal taste status (TTS) describes a phenotype whereby some individuals experience a thermally-induced taste on thermal stimulation of the tongue (thermal tasters; TTs) and some do not (thermal non-tasters; TnTs). TTs experience a range of orosensations elicited by aqueous solutions and some beverages more intensely than TnTs. Whether this extends throughout ingestion duration is unknown, despite the fact that the evolution of flavour on the palate is a key component of consumer acceptance of food/beverages. We sought to use temporal-check-all-that-apply (TCATA) to determine how beer perception varies with TTS. A secondary aim was to investigate the effects of serving temperature and a concurrent auditory cue on TCATA responses and how these may interact with TTS. Forty-one female participants (21 TTs, 20 TnTs) were trained to identify seven dominant sensations elicited by a de-alcoholized beer (astringent, bitter, carbonation, fruity/hops, malty, sour, sweet). Beer samples were served in duplicate at either 6 °C or 21 °C with or without a concurrent auditory cue consisting of a sound clip of effervescence. TTs cited astringent and bitter more frequently than TnTs (p(F) ≤ 0.01), and the area under the curve (AUC) was greater for TTs for several sensations (p(t) < 0.05). Samples served at 6 °C had higher carbonation citation frequencies (p(F) < 0.001) and AUC at 0–30 s (p(t) < 0.001) and 30.1–60 s (p(t) < 0.05) than the warmer samples, with responses for astringent following a same pattern. AUC for carbonation and astringent varied within the sound conditions at 0–30 s (p(t) < 0.05). Overall, these results show that the ‘taste’ advantage of TTs extends to beer, and that temporal methods are needed to more fully describe consumer variation. 相似文献