Acquisition and transfer of conditional discrimination performance.

In 2 experiments I examined the effects of stimulus modality and the intermixing of nonreinforced feature (X–) presentations on rats' acquisition and transfer of performance in appetitive feature positive discriminations. The effects of both manipulations depended on whether the feature (X) and target (A) cues were presented serially (X→A) or simultaneously (XA) on reinforced compound trials. In Exp 1, serial positive patterning (X→A+, A–, X–) discriminations were no more difficult to learn than serial feature positive (X→A+, A–) discriminations, and acquisition of both discriminations was more rapid when X and A were of different stimulus modalities. Furthermore, after X→A+, A–, X– training, there was more transfer of performance to a compound of X with a target cue that had been trained in the same manner as A, but with a different feature. In Exp 2, simultaneous XA+, A–, X– discriminations were more difficult to learn than simultaneous XA+, A– discriminations. Furthermore, XA+, A–, X– discriminations were easier when X and A were of the same modality, but XA+, A– discriminations were unaffected by that variable. Finally, transfer to novel compounds of X was nearly complete after XA+, A– training but nonexistent after XA+, A–, X– training. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Transfer of negative occasion setting and conditioned inhibition across conditioned and unconditioned stimuli.

The transfer of negative occasion setting and conditioned inhibition across conditioned stimuli (CSs) and unconditioned stimuli (USs) was examined in four experiments that used Pavlovian appetitive feature negative discrimination training procedures with rats. After training with simultaneous compounds (A+, XA–), X inhibited conditioned responding (CRs) elicited by other CSs and CRs supported by other appetitive USs that had not been involved in discrimination training. After training with serial compounds (A+, X→A–), X's power to set the occasion for nonresponding transferred across CSs and USs only if those events had also been involved in serial feature negative discrimination training. The results supported the suggestion that the acquisition of negative occasion setting involves the representation of individual events in a higher order memory system, separate from that involved in simple association, and that negative occasion setters act only on events that are represented in that system. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Occasion setting with simultaneous compounds in rats.

Investigated rats' solutions of simultaneous feature positive discriminations (XA+, A–). When X was a visual cue and A was an auditory cue of moderate intensity, the rats solved the discrimination by associating X with the food unconditioned stimulus (UCS) and ignoring A. But when X was a visual cue and A was a loud auditory cue, the rats solved the discrimination by using X to set the occasion for responding that was based on associations between A and the UCS. The use of these two strategies was apparently determined by the perceptual (intensity) characteristics of A during learning of the discrimination: It was not affected by A's conditioning history prior to discrimination training, nor by A's intensity during a posttraining test. The results were discussed in terms of recent theories of occasion setting and generalization. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Perirhinal cortex lesions impair simultaneous but not serial feature-positive discrimination learning.

The role of the perirhinal cortex in discriminative eyeblink conditioning was examined by means of feature-positive discrimination procedures with simultaneous (A-/XA+) and serial (A-/X→A+) stimulus compounds. Lesions of the perirhinal cortex severely impaired acquisition of simultaneous feature-positive discrimination but produced no impairment in serial feature-positive discrimination. The results suggest that the perirhinal cortex plays a role in discriminative eyeblink conditioning by resolving ambiguity in discriminations with overlapping stimulus elements. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Role of within-compound associations in occasion setting: A blocking analysis.

Retracted October 1990. (See record 1991-03475-001.) In two experiments with rat subjects we evaluated the relation between within-compound associations and occasion setting established during feature-positive discriminations. Various treatments preceded serial feature-positive discrimination training in which A and B served as the feature, and X as the element common to reinforced and nonreinforced trials. In Experiment 1, prior serial feature-positive training using A as the feature blocked acquisition of an association between the novel B feature and the unconditioned stimulus (US), an association between the novel B and the common element (X), and the occasion-setting function of B. However, prior simultaneous feature-positive training using A as the feature blocked an association between the novel B and the US and between B and X but did not block acquisition of an occasion-setting function by B. In Experiment 2, serial nondifferential conditioning endowed the A stimulus with the capacity to block acquisition of a B–US association and a within-compound association between B and X but did not prevent acquisition of occasion setting to B. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

The role of similarity in human associative learning.

In 2 experiments, humans received sequences of patterns that were similar (AX→BX, AY→BY, AZ→BZ) or dissimilar (CX→DY, CY→DZ, CZ→DX). The patterns were portrayed as bugs that could be eliminated with 2 insecticide sprays (red or blue). Either spray eliminated bugs with Features A and C, and participants learned by trial and error to use one spray (e.g., red) to eliminate bugs with Feature B and the other spray (e.g., blue) to eliminate those with Feature D. In Experiment 1, participants' spray choice for bugs with Feature A came to match that used to eliminate bugs with Feature B, but there was no such associative transfer between Features C and D. That is, similarity promoted associative transfer of responding between paired patterns when the features used to manipulate similarity (i.e., X, Y, and Z) were irrelevant. In Experiment 2, in which X, Y, and Z were relevant to the solution of configural discrimination, similarity hindered such associative transfer. These results complement those found in pigeons (R. A. Rescorla & D. J. Gillan, 1980) and indicate that similarity should not be accorded independent status as a principle of associative learning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Conditions Favoring Superconditioning of Irrelevant Conditioned Stimuli.

Three appetitive conditioning experiments with rats found partial learning of complex XA+ , XB+ , XAB- (+ stands for reinforced; - stands for unreinforced) negative patterning discriminations with intermixed A+ and B+ trials (Experiment 1). AB+ trials (Experiment 2), and A+ , B+ , and AB+ trials (Experiment 3). In all experiments, differential responding emerged more slowly during the learning of the negative patterning discriminations than during learning of the XA+ , XB+ , XC- control discriminations. Additionally, the negative patterning groups responded more to X than to a separately reinforced Y on unreinforced test trials: thus, X derived superexcitatory properties. This pattern was reversed in the control groups. Results are consistent with theories that allow for different activation patterns when elements are combined. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)     

Excitation and inhibition in unblocking.

In four experiments the nature of learning established with unblocking procedures in the appetitive conditioning of rats was examined. Measures of learning included response topography, effects of selective satiation, and summation and retardation tests of conditioned inhibition. One cue (A) was first paired with either a single unconditioned stimulus event, US1, or a sequence of two events, US1→US2. US2 was either qualitatively similar to (US2-Same) or different from (US2-Diff) US1. Then, a compound of A and a novel cue (X) was reinforced with US1 or US1→US2. Conditioning to X was blocked if either the single US1 or the US1→US2 sequence was used in both phases. If X accompanied an upshift in the reinforcer, from US1 to US1→US2, it acquired conditioned responding, especially when US2-Diff was used. Responding in the latter case was the consequence of both X-US1 and X-US2 associations. In Experiments 1–3, if X accompanied a downshift from US1→US2-Same to US1, it acquired conditioned responding that was based on X–US1 associations, but if it accompanied a downshift from US1→US2-Diff to US1, it acquired conditioned inhibition based on X-US2 associations. In Experiment 4, X acquired net inhibition at short US1→US2 intervals and net excitation at longer intervals, with downshifts from either US1→US2-Same or US1→US2-Diff to US1. However, the interval gradient was broader with downshifts from US1→US2-Diff. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Overshadowing and associability change.

Three appetitive Pavlovian conditioning experiments with rats examined the associability of stimuli A and B that had a history of compound conditioning (AB+), relative to stimuli X and Y that had a history of conditioning in isolation (X+, Y+). Following this training, Experiment 1 revealed that conditioned responding was higher to X and Y than to A and B (overshadowing). In a subsequent AY+, AX?, BY? test discrimination, the AY/BY discrimination was solved more readily than the AY/AX discrimination. In Experiment 2, following AB+, X+, Y+ training, A and Y were presented as a compound and signaled the availability of reinforcement upon the performance of an instrumental response. Test trials in which A and Y were presented alone, and in extinction, revealed that A acquired greater control of instrumental responding than Y. Experiment 3 revealed that following AB+, X+, Y+ training, A and B served as more effective discriminative stimuli for instrumental responding than X and Y. Overall, these results imply that the associability of stimuli conditioned in compound is higher than stimuli conditioned in isolation. These results are discussed in terms of attentional theories of associative learning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)     

Contextual control in discrimination reversal learning.

In 3 human predictive learning experiments, the authors examined contextual control of responding in discrimination reversal learning. In Phase 1, a discrimination between 2 stimuli (A+, B-) was trained in Context 1. During Phase 2, participants received discrimination reversal training (A-, B+) in Context 2. Testing occurred in Context 1 and Context 2 (Experiments 1A and 1B) or in Context 1 and Context 3 (Experiment 2). During the test phase, performance in Context 1 and Context 2 reflected the contingencies trained during Phase 1 and Phase 2, respectively. When testing occurred in Context 3, there was no discriminative responding between A and B. In addition, the experiments demonstrated that discriminating stimuli with a consistent reinforcement history were also affected by contextual manipulations. Results indicate that each training context acquires the ability to control performance. Unique-cue and configural approaches account for a major part of the results. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Encoding specific associative memory: Evidence from behavioral and neural manipulations.

Within-subjects procedures with rats assessed the associative structures acquired during conditioning trials in which the interval between the stimuli and food was either short or long (i.e., A–10 s→food and B–40 s→food). In Experiments 1 and 2, after these conditioning trials, A and B served as second-order reinforcers for 2 further stimuli (i.e., X→A and Y→B); whereas Experiment 3 used a sensory preconditioning procedure in which X→A and Y→B trials occurred before the conditioning trials, and rats were finally tested with X and Y. In each experiment, Y elicited greater responding at test than did X. This finding supports the contention that the long-lived trace of B (associated with food on B–40 s→food trials) is more similar to the memory of B that was associatively provoked by Y, than is the short-lived trace of A (associated with food on A–10 s→food trials) to the memory of A that was associatively provoked by X. These conclusions were reinforced by the effects of a neural manipulation that disrupted discrimination learning involving the short traces of stimuli but not the long traces of the same stimuli. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)     

Transfer across unconditioned stimuli in serial feature discrimination training.

The transfer of conditioned modulation across CS and unconditioned stimulus/stimuli (UCS) was examined in 3 experiments that used Pavlovian appetitive training procedures with rats. In Exp 1, after training in a positive patterning discrimination (X→A+/X-/A-), X increased CR elicited by another trained-then-extinguished CS as long as that CS had been trained with the same UCS as was used in discrimination training. In Exp 2, after training with a feature-negative discrimination (X→A-/A+), X inhibited CR elicited by another trained-then-extinguished CS as long as that CS had been trained with the same UCS. Exps 1 and 2 used a between-groups design, and Exp 3 used a within-groups design. In Exp 3, rats were trained in a feature-positive discrimination (X→A+/A-). In transfer tests, X increased CR elicited by another CS trained then extinguished with the same UCS from training. This increase was greater than the X increased CR elicited by another CS trained then extinguished with a different UCS from training. Results supported the suggestion that features trained in serial discrimination tasks influence behavior indirectly by transiently raising or lowering the threshold for activation of the UCS representations by its target stimuli and by any other stimuli that may be associated with that UCS. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Transfer between contextual conditional discriminations: An examination of how stimulus conjunctions are represented.

In 2 experiments, when rats were placed in 1 pair of contexts, A and B, 2 relationships were in force (X→food and Y→no food), and when they were placed in another pair of contexts, C and D, the complementary relationships were operative (Y→food and X→no food). In Experiment 1, rats then received a 2nd discrimination that was either contextually congruent (in A and B, Y→food and X→no food; in C and D, X→food and Y→no food) or contextually incongruent (in A and D, Y→food and X→no food; in C and B, X→food and Y→no food) with the 1st discrimination. In Experiment 2, the 1st discrimination, involving X and Y, was interleaved with a 2nd discrimination, involving V and W, that was again either congruent (in A and B, V→food and W→no food) or incongruent (in A and D, V→food and W→no food) with the 1st discrimination. The congruent discriminations were acquired more readily than were the incongruent discriminations. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Acquisition of superexcitatory properties by an irrelevant background stimulus.

Six appetitive conditioning experiments with rats demonstrated that an irrelevant X accompanying a negative patterning discrimination (XA+, XB+, XAB-) acquires extraordinarily high levels of conditioned excitation. Responding to X was similar to that evoked by 2 excitors in combination (Experiment 1) and was greater than responding to a separately reinforced Y (Experiments 2-5). Superexcitatory properties were not acquired by X in the nonpatterning discriminations of Experiments 2-4. Experiment 5 found that A and B, if anything, were weakly excitatory. Making them more strongly excitatory after conditioning did not interfere with retention of the original discrimination (Experiment 6). Results support a counterintuitive prediction of associative theories that, under carefully arranged conditions, irrelevant stimuli may acquire superexcitatory properties. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Temporal Coding in Conditioned Inhibition: Analysis of Associative Structure of Inhibition.

Two experiments with rats as subjects were conducted to investigate the associative structure of temporal control of conditioned inhibition through posttraining manipulation of the training excitor-unconditioned stimulus (US) temporal relationship. Experiment 1 found that following simultaneous Pavlovian inhibition training (i.e., A → US/XA-no US) in which a conditioned stimulus (CS A) was established as a delay excitor, maximal inhibition was observed on a summation test when CS X was compounded with a delay transfer CS. Furthermore, posttraining shifts in the A-US temporal relationship from delay to trace resulted in maximal inhibition of a trace transfer CS. Experiment 2 found complementary results to Experiment 1 with an A-US posttraining shift from serial to simultaneous. These results suggest that temporal control of inhibition is mediated by the training excitor-US temporal relationship. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

The influence of associability changes in negative patterning and other discriminations.

Normal rats showed faster learning of a serial negative patterning (NP) discrimination (X+, A+, X→ A–) than of a comparable feature negative (FN) discrimination (A+, X→ A–). This advantage was absent in rats with lesions of the amygdala central nucleus. Earlier data indicated that this brain lesion interferes with surprise-induced increases in attention specified by the Pearce-Hall model (J. M. Pearce & G. Hall, 1980). In the NP task, but not the IN task, omission of the reinforcer after X on X→ A– trials was surprising. A variation of the NP task (NPX), in which X was reinforced on both X+ and X→ A–trials, was learned more rapidly than the NP task. Lesioned rats were unimpaired in learning the NPX task. Evaluation of the lesion effects and the results of postraining transfer tests suggested that the NP advantage involved attentional processes, whereas the NPX advantage was based on the acquisition of inhibitory control by aspects of excitation conditioned to X. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Analysis of the content of configural representations: The role of associatively evoked and trace memories.

Two experiments examined the content of configural learning in rats. In Experiment 1, after simple pre-exposure to two hybrid contexts (AB and CD), rats acquired a configural discrimination involving two of the contexts (A and C) and two auditory stimuli (X and Y; AX→food, AY→no food, CX→no food, and CY→food). When rats were then placed in context B, they were more likely to respond to X than Y, and when they were placed in context D the reverse was the case. Experiment 2 demonstrated that rats can acquire a configural discrimination involving the presence of context (A) and its memory trace (a; AX→food, AY→no food, aX→no food, and aY→food). These results show that associatively provoked memories (Experiment 1) and memory traces (Experiment 2) can participate in configural discriminations. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Value transfer in a simultaneous discrimination appears to result from within-event Pavlovian conditioning.

When pigeons acquire a simple simultaneous discrimination, some of the value acquired by the S+ transfers to the S–. The mechanism underlying this transfer of value was examined in three experiments. In Experiment 1, pigeons trained on two simultaneous discriminations (A?+?B– and C?+?D–) showed a preference for B over D. This preference was reduced, however, following the devaluation of A. In Experiment 2, when after the same original training, value was given to D, the pigeons' preference for C did not significantly increase. In Experiment 3, when both discriminations involved partial reinforcement (S±), A?+?C– training resulted in a preference for B over D, whereas B?+?D– training resulted in a preference for A over C. Thus, simultaneous discrimination training appears to result in bidirectional within-event conditioning involving the S+ and S–. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Memory for, and salience of, the unique features of similar stimuli in perceptual learning.

In two experiments, participants received exposure to complex checkerboards (e.g., AX and BX) that consisted of small distinctive features (A and B) superimposed on a larger common background (X). Subsequent discrimination between AX and BX, assessed by a same-different task, was facilitated when the stimuli were presented on alternate trials in preexposure—a perceptual learning effect (Experiment 1). The hypothesis that this form of exposure results in more accurate representations of the unique features was supported in Experiment 1, which showed that participants were well able to match the color of the feature with its shape. Experiment 2 showed that exposure to A and B in isolation, intermixed with presentations of AX and BX, enhanced the perceptual learning effect, which confirmed that the better encoding of the unique features during intermixed preexposure is a direct cause of the enhanced discrimination observed following preexposure on this schedule. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)     

"Marking effects in Pavlovian trace conditioning": Correction to Thomas, Robertson, and Lieberman.

Reports an error in "Marking effects in Pavlovian trace conditioning" by Glyn V. Thomas, Derek Robertson and David A. Lieberman (Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1987[Apr], Vol 13[2], 126-135). The last sentence in the second paragraph of the Discussion on page 128 should read as follows: "A second possibility is that in the marked ITI group, the marking of irrelevant events in the middle of the intertrial interval promoted associations between those events and food, which then interfered with the learning of an association between SI and food." (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 1987-24113-001.) In four experiments we investigated pigeons' acquisition of a successive discrimination with a trace autoshaping procedure. The conditioned stimuli were 5-s presentations of colored key lights, one of which was followed by food after a 5-s delay. In Experiment 1, which used spatially defined cues, we found that acquisition of differential responding to the reinforced cue was facilitated when a brief flash of light immediately followed both reinforced and nonreinforced cues. Experiment 2 found a similar enhancement by the added light flash in a purely visual discrimination. Experiment 3 found that the flash facilitated learning only when presented immediately after the discriminative cues, and not when it occurred immediately before the cues or at the time of reinforcement. A fourth experiment found this facilitation effect only when the flash and reinforcement occurred on the same trial. These results are interpreted in terms of marking: The flash enhanced learning because it triggered a backward scan through recent memory to search for possible predictors. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)