Treatment of clinically localized prostatic cancer--endocrine therapy

We assessed the actuarial survival of 28 patients with localized prostate cancer who were treated with endocrine therapy in comparison with that of 19 patients who had radical prostatectomy between 1972 and 1995. There were no significant differences among the cause-specific curves and clinical disease-free survival of patients treated with endocrine therapy and radical prostatectomy but the all-cause survival curves favored the surgery group. The results of endocrine therapy alone were unsatisfactory for the patients with high grade tumors. In conclusion, the patients with localized prostate cancer at high risk of death from other complications are reasonable candidates for endocrine therapy.     

Predictors of survival for prostate carcinoma patients treated with salvage radical prostatectomy after radiation therapy

BACKGROUND: Salvage radical prostatectomy is a treatment option for patients with recurrent cancer following radiation therapy. This study was conducted to identify predictors of survival for patients treated with salvage radical prostatectomy. METHODS: The authors studied 86 prostate carcinoma patients who underwent salvage radical prostatectomy for locally persistent or recurrent prostate carcinoma at Mayo Clinic between 1967 and 1996. The mean interval from radiation therapy to biopsy-proven recurrence was 3.7 years (range, 6 months to 17 years). Patient age at surgery ranged from 51 to 78 years (median, 66 years). The mean follow-up after surgery was 5.8 years (range, 1.0-15.2 years). Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify clinical and pathologic factors associated with distant metastasis free survival and cancer specific survival. RESULTS: Actuarial distant metastasis free survival, cancer specific survival, and overall survival were 83%, 91%, and 85% at 5 years and 69%, 64%, and 54% at 10 years, respectively. In multivariate analysis, radical prostatectomy Gleason score and DNA ploidy were independent predictors of distant metastasis free survival and cancer specific survival. CONCLUSIONS: Postirradiation Gleason score and DNA ploidy were highly predictive of the clinical outcomes of patients treated by salvage radical prostatectomy after radiation therapy.     

Sensitization of olfactory guanylyl cyclase to a specific imprinted odorant in coho salmon

PURPOSE: Local recurrence is a significant problem following primary surgery for advanced vulva carcinoma. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the impact of adjuvant vulvar radiation on local control in high risk patients and the impact of local recurrence on overall survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1980-1994, 62 patients with invasive vulva carcinoma and either positive or close (less 8 mm) margins of excision were retrospectively studied. Thirty-one patients were treated with adjuvant radiation therapy to the vulva and 31 patients were observed after surgery. Kaplan-Meier estimates and the Cox proportional hazard regression model were used to evaluate the effect of adjuvant radiation therapy on local recurrence and overall survival. Independent prognostic factors for local recurrence and survival were also assessed. RESULTS: Local recurrence occurred in 58% of observed patients and 16% in patients treated with adjuvant radiation therapy. Adjuvant radiation therapy significantly reduced local recurrence rates in both the close margin and positive margin groups (p = 0.036, p = 0.0048). On both univariate and multivariate analysis adjuvant radiation and margins of excision were significant prognostic predictors for local control. Significant determinants of actuarial survival included International Federation of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (FIGO) stage, percentage of pathologically positive inguinal nodes and margins of excision. The positive margin observed group had a significantly poorer actuarial 5 year survival than the other groups (p = 0.0016) and adjuvant radiation significantly improved survival for this group. The 2 year actuarial survival after developing local recurrence was 25%. Local recurrence was a significant predictor for death from vulva carcinoma (risk ratio 3.54). CONCLUSION: Local recurrence is a common occurrence in high risk patients. In this study adjuvant radiation therapy significantly reduced local recurrence rates and may improve overall survival in certain subgroups. As salvage rates after developing local recurrence are poor adjuvant vulvar radiation should be considered for patients at risk after primary surgery.     

A worse prognosis for men with testicular atrophy at therapeutic orchiectomy for prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The significance of testicular atrophy at the time of therapeutic orchiectomy for prostate carcinoma has not been examined even though pretreatment hypogonadism has been associated with poor prognosis during chemical androgen ablation for these tumors. METHODS: Survival after therapeutic orchiectomy was determined for 78 men with prostate carcinoma and related to the histologic severity of testicular atrophy. Included in analysis were the presence or absence of prior radiation therapy, tumor grade and stage at diagnosis, host age, obesity, and smoking habits. RESULTS: Among 35 men who underwent therapeutic orchiectomy for progressive disease after primary radiation therapy to the prostate bed, the 25 men with testicular atrophy had worse 5-year, tumor specific, postorchiectomy survival than the 10 men without testicular atrophy (30% vs. 89%) (P=0.02). These 25 men had tumors of more advanced stage and greater undifferentiation at the time of diagnosis an average of 45 months before orchiectomy, but neither characteristic was related to postorchiectomy survival. Among 25 men with Stage D2 disease (American Urologic Association staging system) with orchiectomy as the primary treatment, the 7 men with testicular atrophy more often had undifferentiated tumors and had lower 2-year tumor specific survival than the 18 men without atrophy (43% vs. 72% ) (P > 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Testicular atrophy at the time of therapeutic orchiectomy for prostate carcinoma is associated with poor postorchiectomy prognosis in men with prior prostate bed radiation therapy and perhaps in men without prior radiation. The association may reflect a high frequency of inherently more aggressive tumors (often relatively nonandrogen-dependent) among those tumors that are progressing in hypogonadal men.     

HpSS: a new silver staining method for Helicobacter pylori

Fifty-seven patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated by radical prostatectomy or external radiation therapy following pelvic lymphadenectomy. Comparing the outcome of radiotherapy with that of prostatectomy in 42 T2 patients without lymph node metastasis, the 5-year cause-specific survival did not differ between the radical prostatectomy group (n = 31) and radiotherapy group (n = 11). The 5-year disease-free survival of the prostatectomy group, however, was superior to that of radiotherapy group (p = 0.01). To cure patients with T2 prostate cancer, therefore, it is supposed that radical prostatectomy should be performed. To improve the treatment outcome after radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery for prostate cancer has been attempted in our institution. Phantom experiments using a linear accelerator demonstrated a round dose distribution, and high reproducibility of prostate positioning was confirmed by CT when a thermoplastic immobilization device was used to fix the pelvis. In one patient with localized prostate cancer treated by radiosurgery, acute complication has not been recognized during the 5 week follow-up. Radiosurgery may be available to treat clinically localized prostate cancer.     

Comparison of radical prostatectomy and iodine 125 interstitial radiotherapy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer: a 7-year biochemical (PSA) progression analysis

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relative efficacy of brachytherapy to radical prostatectomy, we compared biochemical progression rates from a published series of men who underwent iodine 125 (125I) interstitial radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer to a similar group of men who underwent anatomic radical prostatectomy using appropriate end points. METHODS: Seventy-six men who underwent anatomic radical prostatectomy between 1988 and 1990 were carefully matched for Gleason score and clinical stage to a recently reported contemporary series of patients treated at another institution with 125I brachytherapy without adjuvant treatment. The definition of biochemical progression was a serum PSA level greater than 0.2 ng/mL after anatomic radical prostatectomy and greater than 0.5 ng/mL for brachytherapy-treated patients. RESULTS: The 7-year actuarial PSA progression-free survival following anatomic radical prostatectomy was 97.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85.6% to 99.7%) for this group of men selected to match the brachytherapy group, compared to 79% (95% CI not published) for men treated with 125I interstitial radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Using comparative end points for biochemical-free progression, failure rates may be higher following 125I interstitial radiotherapy compared to anatomic radical prostatectomy. These data provide a better comparison of biochemical progression than previously published studies and emphasize the need for caution in interpreting the relative efficacy of brachytherapy in controlling localized prostate cancer.     

Molecular and pharmacological characterization of recombinant rat/mice N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subtypes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

PURPOSE: To assess the local control and survival in patients who received pelvic irradiation for locally recurrent rectal carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The records of 519 patients with locally recurrent rectal carcinoma treated principally with external-beam radiation therapy between 1975 to 1985 at a single institute were retrospectively reviewed. These included 326 patients who relapsed locally following previous abdominoperineal resection, 151 after previous low anterior resection, and 42 after previous local excision or electrocoagulation for the primary. No patients had received adjuvant radiation therapy or chemotherapy for the primary disease. Concurrent extrapelvic distant metastases were found in 164 (32%) patients at local recurrence and, in the remaining 355, the relapse was confined to the pelvis. There were 290 men and 229 women whose age ranged from 23 to 91 years (median = 65). Median time from initial surgery to radiation therapy for local recurrence was 18 months (3-138 months). Radiation therapy was given with varying dose-fractionation schedules, total doses ranging from 4.4 to 65.0 Gy (median = 30 Gy) over 1 to 92 days (median = 22 days). For 214 patients who received a total dose > or = 35 Gy, radiation therapy was given in 1.8 to 2.5 Gy daily fractions. RESULTS: The median survival was 14 months and the median time to local disease progression was 5 months from date of pelvic irradiation. The 5-year survival was 5%, and the pelvic disease progression-free rate was 7%. Twelve patients remained alive and free of disease at 5 years after pelvic irradiation. Upon multivariate analysis, overall survival was positively correlated with ECOG performance status (p = 0.0001), absence of extrapelvic metastases (p = 0.0001), long intervals from initial surgery to radiation therapy for local recurrence (p = 0.0001), total radiation dose (p = 0.0001), and absence of obstructive uropathy (p = 0.0013). Pelvic disease progression-free rates were positively correlated with ECOG performance status (p = 0.0001), total radiation dose (p = 0.0001), and previous conservative surgery for the primary (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Survival is poor for patients who develop local recurrence following previous surgery for rectal carcinoma. Pelvic radiation therapy provides only short-term palliation, and future efforts should be directed to the use of effective adjuvant therapy for patients with rectal carcinoma who are at high risk of local recurrence.     

The National Cancer Data Base report on race, age, and region variations in prostate cancer treatment

BACKGROUND: Patterns of care for prostate cancer patients in the United States have changed as early detection has improved. The National Cancer Data Base of the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer provides information about the treatment of patients in all age, race, and regional groups from institutions that represent cancer care at the community level as well as in medical centers. METHODS: Data on 251,416 prostate cancer patients diagnosed between 1992 and 1994 were studied. Patient and disease characteristics, including age, race, the geographic region from which a case was reported, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, and tumor grade were related to the primary pattern of treatment. Stage-standardized comparisons were made among different age groups, race groups, and regional groups. RESULTS: Stage and tumor grade varied little across age, race, and regional classifications. African American patients were more likely than white patients to have Stage IV prostate cancer at the time of diagnosis. Men older than 75 years had greater proportions than younger men of both the earliest and the most advanced stages of cancer. Overall, 24.6% of patients received no cancer-directed therapy, 11.6% were treated with hormones or endocrine surgery, 28.6% received radiation therapy, 28.3% underwent radical prostatectomy, and 6.9% were treated by other modalities or combinations of modalities. Treatment patterns varied markedly by age. The selection of radical prostatectomy relative to no treatment and radiation therapy varied by race and region. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study showed that prostate cancer treatment varies by patient age, race, and geographic region. The reasons for some of these variations are not well understood and deserve further investigation.     

Intraoperative radiotherapy combined with external beam radiation for prostate cancer without metastasis

Between 1989 and 1996, 35 patients with prostate cancer without metastasis received intraoperative radiotherapy combined with external beam radiation. 10 of 16 stage B patients and all of 19 stage C patients received additional endocrine therapy for the initial treatment. The radiation therapy included 25-30 Gy of intraoperative radiotherapy for prostate and 30 Gy of external beam radiotherapy for small pelvic region. One patient of stage C was dead for cancer and 4 patient were dead for other causes during 15-99 (mean: 41.6) months follow up period. The overall actuarial survival at 5 years by Kaplan-Meier method were 92.3% for stage B and 87.2% for stage C. Although cystitis, proctitis and anal bleeding were observed as the adverse effects of radiotherapy, both acute and chronic symptoms were not critical. In conclusion, intraoperative radiotherapy combined with external beam radiotherapy was revealed as an effective treatment for prostate cancer without metastasis.     

Prostate cancer in American Indians, New Mexico, 1969 to 1994

PURPOSE: Prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer as well as the leading cause of cancer death among American Indian men. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To describe further the occurrence of prostate cancer among American Indian men, we examined population based incidence, treatment, survival and mortality data for American Indians in New Mexico during the 25-year period 1969 to 1994. RESULTS: Although American Indian men have a lower risk of prostate cancer than nonHispanic white men, the incidence and mortality rates are rising for American Indians, and mortality rates are now equal to those for nonHispanic white men. During the 25-year period age adjusted incidence rates for American Indians increased from 42.2/100,000 (95% confidence interval 27.1 to 57.3) to 64.6/100,000 (95% confidence interval 46.2 to 83.0). The burden of prostate cancer among American Indian men compared with nonHispanic white men was reflected in disproportionately high mortality rates in relation to incidence rates. The mortality rates were high because American Indian cases were more advanced at diagnosis, 23.3% of prostate cancers were diagnosed after distant spread had occurred compared with 11.6% for nonHispanic white men and the 5-year relative survival rate was poorer (57.1% compared with 77.6% for nonHispanic white men). CONCLUSIONS: Effective and culturally sensitive cancer control efforts for prostate cancer in American Indian communities are urgently needed.     

Early results of a prospective study of hormone therapy for patients with locally advanced prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Locally advanced prostate carcinoma is usually not curable with surgery or radiation therapy. Primary hormone therapy is an alternative therapeutic option, but contemporary prospective studies of the outcomes of such therapy are not available. METHODS: The authors conducted a prospective, hospital-based study of gonadal androgen ablation with deferred antiandrogen therapy in 103 men with prostate carcinoma clinically classified as T3-4NXM0. The median potential follow-up was 51 months (range, 36-74 months), and the median period of observation was 43 months (range, 6-74 months). RESULTS: Each patient experienced regression of the primary tumor, and none experienced significant morbidity from the primary tumor during the study period. The projected 5-year cause specific, metastasis free, PSA disease free (no PSA elevation > 1.0 ng/mL after the beginning of antiandrogen therapy), and all-cause survival rates were 84%, 84%, 68%, and 58%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Primary hormone therapy is a reasonable treatment option for locally advanced prostate carcinoma in elderly men or in men with significant comorbid disease who request therapeutic intervention.     

Osteoporosis after orchiectomy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE: The possibility of increased osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures following therapeutic orchiectomy in men with prostate cancer was investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 235 men with nonstage A prostate cancer diagnosed between 1983 and 1990 was analyzed for therapeutic orchiectomy, other osteoporotic risk factors and subsequent hospital treatment for osteoporotic fractures. The 17 castrated men alive in 1995 were interviewed, and femoral neck bone mineral density was compared to that of 23 controls of similar age. RESULTS: Risk factors for osteoporosis, including smoking, slender habitus and atrophic testes, were common among men treated with orchiectomy. Of the men in the study cohort 10 had osteoporotic fractures: 8 of 59 treated with and 2 of 176 without orchiectomy (13.6 versus 1.1%, p < 0.001). First fracture cumulative incidence rates 7 years after castration or diagnosis were 28 and 1%, respectively (p < 0.001). Osteoporotic fractures were much more common than pathological fractures or those due to major trauma (1 each). Bone mineral density averaged 0.91, 0.84, 0.79 and 0.66 gm./cm.2 in 9 controls without prostate cancer, 14 men with prostate cancer before orchiectomy, 9 men at 9 to 60 and 8 men at 60 to 115 months after orchiectomy, respectively. Of the 16 men surviving for longer than 60 months after orchiectomy 6 had osteoporotic fractures, as did 5 of 6 and 5 of 7 with a bone mineral density of less than 0.70 gm./cm.2 and less than 75% of normal for age, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Orchiectomy for prostate cancer is frequently followed by severe osteoporosis, some of which had developed before castration. Appropriate therapy should be identified that does not diminish the antitumorigenic effectiveness of androgen ablation.     

Survival following breast-conserving surgery and irradiation or modified radical mastectomy in patients with invasive breast cancers with a maximum diameter of 1 cm

The reported relapse-free survival for women with invasive breast cancers measuring no more than 10 mm in dimension ranges from 75% to 95%, with axillary status an important prognostic factor in most series. Further study of prognostic variables in this most favorable subset is notably limited. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 168 women with invasive breast cancers < or = 10 mm treated with either breast conserving surgery+axillary dissection (AXD) and radiation therapy, or mastectomy+AXD. The actuarial survival and survival free of distant metastases (DMFS) at 7 years was 95% and 97%, respectively. Location and size of the primary tumor were most important in predicting outcome, although statistical significance was not achieved. The 5-year distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) was 100% for central and inner quadrant tumors, compared to 97% in those with outer quadrant tumors, p = 0.18. The 5-year DMFS was 100%, 95%, and 98% for patients with cancers 2-5 mm, 6-9 mm, and 10 mm, respectively, p = 0.15. Status of the axillary lymph nodes, type of breast surgery, clinical tumor status (palpable vs. nonpalpable), age, menopausal status, histologic grade, systemic therapy, or histologic type were not found to have a significant impact on prognosis.     

Contemporary hormonal management of advanced prostate cancer

The traditional definition of "advanced" prostate cancer includes only patients with widespread osteoblastic or soft-tissue metastases (clinical or pathologic stage T any N any M1; or stage D2). Current evidence indicates that this definition should be broadened. Because many patients with T3 disease or local lymph node metastases progress to distant metastases, the concept of advanced prostate cancer should also include stages C and D1 (T3, T4, and any T N1). Furthermore, based on pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, many men treated for clinically localized disease will progress rapidly and, depending on their age and general health, should be included in the advanced-disease category. Also, using prognostic marker modeling with PSA, tumor grade, and other factors, recurrences can be predicted even earlier in many cases. This may be particularly significant in light of recent clinical data indicating that early androgen ablation therapy delays disease progression and improves survival in patients with advanced (M0 or M1) disease. The luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists have become the preferred method of androgen ablation in patients with advanced prostate cancer. Use of an LHRH agonist, alone or combined with an antiandrogen, is more acceptable to many patients than orchiectomy and lacks the potential cardiotoxicity associated with estrogens. Combined hormonal therapy remains controversial but may provide a modest survival benefit, especially in men with minimal metastatic disease. Intermittent hormonal therapy has great appeal, particularly because of the potentially deleterious effects of long-term hormonal therapy; however, its efficacy has yet to be proven.     

In vivo tendon forces correlate with activity level and remain bounded: evidence in a rabbit flexor tendon model

The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility, clinical tolerance, local control, and survival rates using a combined-modality treatment program of intraoperative radiation, chemotherapy, and external beam radiation for the management of patients with pancreatic cancer. One hundred eighty patients with biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma of the pancreas have been treated by a single surgical practice between 1979 and 1992. Of these, 105 had locally advanced but unresectable primary tumors (stages 2 and 3). All patients were treated with a program of multimodality therapy, including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. Three groups were identified. Group I (33 patients) received intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) as part of their treatment. Group II (43 patients) received intraoperative radiation in the form of iodine-125 (I-125) implantation. Group III (29 patients) received no intraoperative radiation. All three groups were comparably similar with respect to age at presentation, amount of preoperative weight loss, preoperative symptoms, and tumor location. Overall perioperative mortality was 4.8 per cent (five patients), with no difference between groups noted. Perioperative complications occurred in 32 (30.4%) of the 105 patients. Complications occurred in only 18.1 per cent of patients in Group I (IORT), compared with 39.5 per cent of Group II (I-125) patients (P < 0.01). Group III patients (no intraoperative radiation) experienced complications in 31.0 per cent of cases (P = 0.09 vs Group I). Actuarial survival was 18 months for Group I (IORT) versus 15 months for Group II (I-125). One- and 2-year actuarial survival rates were 60 and 17 per cent for patients in Group I (IORT) and 56 and 19 per cent for Group II (I-125). Actuarial local control rates for patients receiving IORT (Group I) was 70 per cent at 2 years. Patients with pancreatic cancer historically have poor survival and local control rates despite aggressive chemotherapy and radiation. The addition of intraoperative radiation to the combined modality management of pancreatic cancer offers markedly improved survival rates and local control with minimal morbidity for patients with unresectable disease. Intraoperative radiation in the form of IORT can be delivered with a significantly fewer complications than I-125 seed implantation.     

Acucise endopyelotomy: a successful therapeutic intervention in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Microvessel density is a promising prognostic factor in management of patients with prostate cancer. Unlike cancer cell-based factors, microvessel density is a host stromal factor that has apparently limited heterogeneity within a cancer. Its predictive value for pathological stage has been demonstrated in most but not all reports. Further, recent studies reveal that microvessel density may be predictive of cancer recurrence and perhaps survival in some patients. Inhibition of angiogenesis may be an effective chemopreventive approach, particularly for men at high risk of prostate cancer. The patient described in the case study may benefit from microvessel density determination. Manual or computer-assisted counting of microvessels in the diagnostic needle biopsy specimen would provide a value that could be compared with published findings to predict pathological stage and outcome, particularly in combination with Gleason score and serum prostate-specific antigen concentration. The probability of extraprostatic extension may be sufficiently high that a urologist may choose not to operate on the patient. Similarly, the probability of recurrence after surgery or radiation may be sufficiently high to warrant adjuvant therapy.     

-Inguinal irradiation versus no lymph node therapy in small vulvar carcinoma with clinically negative lymph nodes (T1, NO-1)-

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this retrospective study was to determine if groin radiation was superior to no therapy in patients with small vulvar cancer with not palpable or not suspicious inguinal lymph nodes (T1, N0-N1). METHODS: From 1974 to 1990, 135 patients with invasive T1, NO-1 vulvar cancer underwent radical vulvectomy with hot knife, groin nodes were left in situ. In 65 patients vulvectomy was followed by inguinofemoral irradiation: 70 patients had none. There were more cases with clitoris carcinoma (p < 0.04) in the group with groin irradiation but no other significant difference in prognostic factors was found. RESULTS: The actuarial 5-year survival was 93.7% with groin irradiation versus 92.4% without lymph node therapy. Inguinal relapses occurred in only 4.6% of cases with groin irradiation versus 10% without lymph node treatment (n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: Radiation therapy to the groin seems to reduce groin relapses in early vulvar cancer.     

Adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for elimination of residual microscopic non-small cell lung cancer

This study determined if patients with residual microscopic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following lung resection treated with combination chemotherapy and radiation realize prolonged survival. Ten men with microscopic NSCLC following resection were given chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Four (40%) of the ten patients were disease-free at 45 months and fully functional. Only two (20%) of the patients died of recurrent lung cancer. Of patients who died of lung cancer, recurrence occurred within five months of treatment and death occurred within one year. The findings suggest combination chemotherapy and radiation therapy delay or prevent recurrence from residual microscopic NSCLC following lung resection.     

Carcinoma of the tonsillar fossa: prognostic factors and long-term therapy outcome

PURPOSE: To identify prognostic parameters and evaluate the therapeutic outcomes for patients with carcinoma of the tonsillar fossa treated with three treatment modalities. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The results of therapy are reported in 384 patients with histologically proven epidermoid carcinoma of the tonsillar fossa; 154 were treated with irradiation alone (55-70 Gy), 144 with preoperative radiation therapy (20-40 Gy), and 86 with postoperative irradiation (50-60 Gy). The operation in all but four patients in the last two groups consisted of an en bloc radical tonsillectomy with ipsilateral lymph node dissection. RESULTS: Treatment modality and total irradiation doses had no impact on survival. Actuarial 10-year disease-free survival rates were 65% for patients with T1 tumors, 60% for T2, 60% for T3, and 30% for T4 disease. Patients with no cervical lymphadenopathy or with a small metastatic lymph node (N1) had better disease-free survival (60% and 70%, respectively) at 5 years than those with large or fixed lymph nodes (30%). Primary tumor recurrence (local, marginal) rates in the T1, T2, and T3 groups were 20-25% in patients treated with irradiation and surgery and 31% for those treated with irradiation alone (difference not statistically significant). In patients with T4 disease treated with surgery and postoperative irradiation, the local failure rate was 32% compared with 86% with low-dose preoperative irradiation and 47% with irradiation alone (p = 0.03). The overall recurrence rates in the neck were 10% for N0 patients, 25% for N1 and N2, and 35-40% for patients with N3 cervical lymph nodes, without significant differences among the various treatment groups. The incidence of contralateral neck recurrences was 8% with the various treatment modalities. On multivariate analysis the only significant factors for local tumor control and disease-free survival were T and N stage (p = 0.04-0.001). Fatal complications were noted in 7 of 144 (5%) patients treated with preoperative irradiation and surgery, 2 of 86 (2%) of those receiving postoperative irradiation, and 2 of 154 (1.3%) patients treated with radiation therapy alone. Other moderate or severe nonfatal sequelae were noted in 30% of the patients treated with preoperative irradiation and surgery, in 53% treated with postoperative irradiation, and in 19% receiving radiation therapy alone. CONCLUSION: Primary tumor and neck node stage are the only significant prognostic factors influencing locoregional tumor control and disease-free survival. Treatment modality had no significant impact on outcome. Radiation therapy remains the treatment of choice for patients with stage T1-T2 carcinoma of the tonsillar fossa. In patients with T3-T4 tumors and good general condition, combination surgery and postoperative irradiation offers better tumor control than single-modality and preoperative irradiation procedures, but with greater morbidity.     

The predictive value of race as a clinical prognostic factor among patients with clinically localized prostate cancer: a multivariate analysis of positive surgical margins

OBJECTIVES: Several investigators have reported that African-American men with clinically localized prostate cancer have poorer survival than do white men. In addition, prostate cancer in African-American men is commonly diagnosed at a more advanced stage of disease. Is race or ethnicity predictive of outcome of clinically localized prostate cancer? It has been reported that the presence of positive surgical margins significantly influences time to progression independently of other prognostic factors. Therefore, we have elected to conduct a multivariate analysis of clinical factors including race as potential predictors of positive surgical margin outcome. METHODS: We studied 369 consecutive men (120 African-American and 249 white) who had radical prostatectomies at a single institution. Comparisons by race of Gleason score, stage, presence of positive surgical margins, and mean preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level were carried out. RESULTS: Our data demonstrate that African-American men have more pathologically locally advanced prostate cancer than do white American men: 69% among blacks compared with 57% among whites. However, the difference in rate of positive surgical margins between blacks and whites is statistically significant: 58% among blacks versus 40% among whites (P = 0.002). Four factors were predictive of positive surgical margins: preoperative PSA level, race, clinical stage, and Gleason score. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that race is an independent predictor of positive surgical margins among patients with clinically localized prostate cancer and should be included in treatment decisions. In addition, the risk of positive surgical margins increases noticeably when PSA is greater than 10 ng/mL.