Relationship between structure and properties in high‐performance PA6/SEBS‐g‐MA/(PPO/PS) blends: The role of PPO and PS

This work aimed at studying the role of poly(phenylene oxide) (PPO) and polystyrene (PS) in toughening polyamide‐6 (PA6)/styrene‐ethylene‐butadiene‐styrene block copolymer grafted with maleic anhydride (SEBS‐g‐MA) blends. The effects of weight ratio and content of PPO/PS on the morphology and mechanical behaviors of PA6/SEBS‐g‐MA/(PPO/PS) blends were studied by scanning electron microscope and mechanical tests. Driving by the interfacial tension and the spreading coefficient, the “core–shell” particles formed by PPO/PS (core) and SEBS‐g‐MA (shell) played the key role in toughening the PA6 blends. As PS improved the distribution of the “core–shell” particles due to its low viscosity, and PPO guaranteed the entanglement density of the PPO/PS phase, the 3/1 weight ratio of PPO/PS supplied the blends optimal mechanical properties. Within certain range, the increased content of PPO/PS could supply more efficient toughening particles and bring better mechanical properties. Thus, by adjusting the weight ratio and content of PPO and PS, the PA6/SEBS‐g‐MA/(PPO/PS) blends with excellent impact strength, high tensile strength, and good heat deflection temperature were obtained. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017 , 134, 45281.     

The reactive compatibilization effect of copolymer macroactivator for immiscible anionic polyamide 6/polystyrene blends via in situ polymerization

In this article, a novel method has been successfully developed to prepare the anionic polyamide 6/polystyrene (APA6/PS) blends. The macroactivator P(St‐co‐IEM) was synthesized by the free radical polymerization of 2‐isocyanatoethyl methacrylate and styrene (St), then the graft copolymer of PS and APA6 (PS‐g‐APA6) can be obtained by the anionic polymerization of ɛ‐caprolactam activated by the macroactivator P(St‐co‐IEM). The X‐ray diffraction analysis, differential scanning calorimetry, scanning electron microscopy analysis, contact angle measurement, water absorption measurement, molau test, thermogravimetric analysis, and mechanical properties test were performed separately to study the effects of P(St‐co‐IEM) on crystallinity, morphology, water resistance, thermal stability, and mechanical properties. The results indicate the synthesis of macroactivator can promote the formation of the γ‐phase. Moreover, it can improve the interfacial compatibility, water resistance, thermal stability, and toughness. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018 , 135, 46302.     

Compatibilizing efficiency of copolymer precursors for immiscible polymer blends

An anhydride‐terminated polystyrene (PS‐b‐Anh) as a block copolymer precursor and a copolymer (PS‐co‐TMI) of styrene (St) and 3‐isopropenyl‐α,α‐dimethylbenzene isocyanate (TMI) as a graft copolymer precursor are chosen to investigate the effect of the type of the copolymer precursor on its compatibilizing and stabilizing efficiency for polymer blends. Results show that during the melt blending of the PS and PA6, the addition of PS‐b‐Anh dramatically decreases the size of the dispersed phase domains, irrespective of its molecular weight. This indicates that a diblock copolymer PS‐block‐PA6 (PS‐b‐PA6) is formed by a reaction between the terminal anhydride moiety of the PS‐b‐Anh and the terminal amine group of the PA6. When PS/PA6 (30/70) blends are annealed at 230°C for 15 min, their morphologies are much more stable in the presence of the PS‐b‐Anh block copolymer precursor than in the presence of the PS‐co‐TMI graft copolymer precursor. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012     

Blends of poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene oxide)/polyamide 6 toughened by maleated polystyrene‐based copolymers: Mechanical properties,morphology, and rheology

Poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene oxide)/polyamide 6 (PPO/PA6 30/70) blends were impact modified by addition of three kinds of maleated polystyrene‐based copolymers, i.e., maleated styrene‐ethylene‐butylene‐styrene copolymer (SEBS‐g‐MA), maleated methyl methacrylate‐butadiene‐styrene copolymer (MBS‐g‐MA), and maleated acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene copolymer (ABS‐g‐MA). The mechanical properties, morphology and rheological behavior of the impact modified PPO/PA6 blends were investigated. The selective location of the maleated copolymers in one phase or at interface accounted for the different toughening effects of the maleated copolymer, which is closely related to their molecular structure and composition. SEBS‐g‐MA was uniformly dispersed in PPO phase and greatly toughened PPO/PA6 blends even at low temperature. MBS‐g‐MA particles were mainly dispersed in the PA6 phase and around the PPO phase, resulting in a significant enhancement of the notched Izod impact strength of PPO/PA6 blends from 45 J/m to 281 J/m at the MBS‐g‐MA content of 20 phr. In comparison, the ABS‐g‐MA was mainly dispersed in PA6 phase without much influencing the original mechanical properties of the PPO/PA6 blend. The different molecule structure and selective location of the maleated copolymers in the blends were reflected by the change of rheological behavior as well. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

Preparation of PS-g-PA6 copolymers by anionic polymerization of ε-caprolactam using PS precursors with N-carbamated caprolactam pendants as macroactivators

The graft copolymer of polystyrene and polyamide 6 (PS-g-PA6) was investigated by anionic polymerization of ε-caprolactam (CL), using the free radical copolymer of styrene and a kind of allyl monomer containing N-carbamated caprolactam group as macroactivator (PS-CCL). CL monomers were grafted onto PS-CCL backbone via initiating N-carbamated caprolactam (CCL) pendants along its backbone to form the graft copolymer in the presence of catalyst sodium caprolactamate. The macroactivator was characterized by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and nuclear magnetic resonance, and the graft copolymer by the selective solvent extraction technique using methanol and chloroform as solvents. PS-g-PA6 copolymers with different PS content were synthesized to study the effect of PS on morphology, crystallinity, dimensional stability, and thermal properties, using scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, water absorption measurement, thermogravimetric analysis, and differential scanning calorimetry. The results show the percentage crystallinity of graft copolymer decreases with increasing PS content, but the addition of PS scarcely influences the crystalline structure of PA6. The graft copolymer has improved thermal properties and dimensional stability. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Polymer blends of poly(ethylene‐2,6‐naphthalate) with polystyrene compatibilized by styrene‐glycidyl methacrylate copolymers. I. Rheology,morphology, and mechanical properties

The compatibilization of blends of poly(ethylene‐2,6‐naphthalate) (PEN) with polystyrene (PS), through the styrene‐glycidyl methacrylate copolymers (SG) containing various glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) contents, was investigated in this study. SG copolymers are able to react with PEN terminal groups during melt blending, resulting in the formation of desirable SG‐g‐PEN copolymers in the blend. These in situ formed copolymers tend to reside along the interface preferentially as the result of interfacial reaction and thus function as effective compatibilizers in PEN/PS blends. The compatibilized blends exhibit higher viscosity, finer phase domain, and improved mechanical properties. It is found that the degree of grafting of the in situ formed SG‐g‐PEN copolymer has to be considered as well. In blends compatibilized with the SG copolymer containing higher GMA content, heavily grafted copolymers would be produced. The length of the styrene segment in these heavily grafted copolymers would be too short to penetrate deep enough into the PS phase to form effective entanglements, resulting in the lower compatibilization efficiency in PEN/PS blends. Consequently, the in situ formation of SG‐g‐PEN copolymers with an optimal degree of grafting is the key to achieving the best performance for the eventually produced PEN/PS blends through SG copolymers. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 87: 967–975, 2003     

Synergistic effects of silica nanoparticles and reactive compatibilizer on the compatibilization of polystyrene/polyamide 6 blends

This study examines the selective dispersion of nano‐SiO₂ in polystyrene (PS) and polyamide 6 (PA6) blends. With the coupling assistance of 3‐methacryloylpropyl trimethoxysilane (MPS), nano‐SiO₂ surfaces are grafted with PS chains of different molecular weights (SiO₂–MPS–PS) or reactive random copolymer of styrene (St) and 3‐isopropenyl‐α,α′‐dimethylbenzene isocyanate (TMI) to produce SiO₂–MPS–P(St–co–TMI). The isocyanate groups of the reactive copolymer can react with the terminal group of the PA6 to form a graft copolymer, which helps in controlling the location of nano‐SiO₂ between the PS and PA6 phases. Field‐emission scanning electron microscopy imaging combined with the rheological method was used to investigate the location and dispersion of nano‐SiO₂, as well as the morphology of the PS/PA6 blends, at low nano‐SiO₂ loading. Compared with pristine SiO₂, the modified SiO₂ with different chain lengths adjusted the PA6 phase with refined size and narrow size distribution because of the strong interaction with both phases. The SiO₂–MPS–PS with appropriate length is the most effective. The use of nano‐SiO₂ along with the reactive compatibilizer provides synergistic effects for improving the compatibilization of PS/PA6 blends. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 57:1301–1310, 2017. © 2017 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Tracer‐compatibilizer: Synthesis and applications in polymer blending processes

This article reports on a route to synthesizing fluorescent labeled graft copolymers, on the one hand; and on a concept of tracer‐compatibilizer for facile build‐up of emulsification curves of polymer blends, on the other hand. For these purposes, blends composed of polystyrene (PS) and polyamide 6 (PA6) are chosen. The synthesis of the corresponding tracer‐compatibilizer consists of three steps: (1) copolymerization of styrene with 3‐isopropenyl‐α,α'‐dimethybenzyl isocyanate (TMI); (2) conversion of a fraction of the isocyanate moieties of the resulting copolymer into anthracene ones upon reacting with 9‐(methylamino‐methyl)anthracene (MAMA); and (3) polymerization of ε‐caprolactam (CL) from the remaining isocyanate moieties. The resulting fluorescent labeled graft copolymer, denoted as PS‐g‐PA6‐Ant, is used to build up emulsification curves of PS/PA6 blends in a twin screw extruder (TSE), showing great usefulness of the concept of tracer‐compatibilizer. POLYM. ENG. SCI. 2012. © 2011 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Tough polyamide 6/core–shell blends prepared via in situ anionic polymerization of ε‐caprolactam by reactive extrusion

In this study, the molten ε‐caprolactam (CL) solution of maleated styrene‐ethylene/butylene‐styrene block copolymer (SEBS‐g‐MA) and polystyrene (PS) containing catalyst and activator were introduced into a twin screw extruder, and polyamide 6 (PA6)/SEBS/PS blends were successfully prepared via anionic polymerization of CL by reactive extrusion. The mechanical properties measurements indicated that both the elongation at break and notched Izod impact strength of PA6/SEBS/PS (85/10/5) blends were improved distinctly with slight loss of tensile and flexural strength as compared to that of pure PA6. The images of transmission electron microscopy showed that a core–shell structure with PS core and poly (ethene‐co‐1‐butene) (PEB) shell was formed within the PA6 matrix. Fourier transform infrared was used to investigate the formation mechanisms of the core–shell structure. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 53:2705–2710, 2013. © 2013 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Polyamide 6/ethylene‐butylene elastomer blends generated via anionic polymerization of ε‐caprolactam: Phase morphology and dynamic mechanical behavior

This paper reports about the polymerization of ε‐caprolactam monomer in the presence of low molecular weight hydroxyl or isocyanate end‐capped ethylene‐butylene elastomer (EB) elastomers as a new concept for the development of a submicron phase morphology in polyamide 6 (PA6)/EB blends. The phase morphology, viscoelastic behavior, and impact strength of the polymerization‐designed blends are compared to those of similar blends prepared via melt‐extrusion of PA6 homopolymer and EB elastomer. Polyamide 6 and EB elastomer were compatibilized using a premade triblock copolymer PA6‐b‐EB‐b‐PA6 or a pure EB‐b‐PA6 diblock reactively generated during melt‐blending (extrusion‐prepared blends) or built‐up via anionic polymerization of ε‐caprolactam on initiating ? NCO groups attached to EB chain ends (polymerization‐prepared blends). Two compatibilization approaches were considered for the polymerization‐prepared blends: (i) the addition of a premade PA6‐b‐EB‐b‐PA6 triblock copolymer to the ε‐caprolactam monomer containing nonreactive EB? OH elastomer and (ii) generation in situ of a PA6‐b‐EB diblock using EB? NCO precursor on which polyamide 6 blocks are built‐up via anionic polymerization of ε‐caprolactam. The noncompatibilized blends exhibit a coarse phase morphology, either in the extruded or the polymerization prepared blends. Addition of premade triblock copolymer (PA6‐b‐EB‐b‐PA6) to a EB? OH /ε‐caprolactam dispersion led to a fine EB phase (0.14 μm) in the PA6 matrix after ε‐caprolactam polymerization. The average particle size of the in situ reactively compatibilized polymerization‐prepared blend is about 1 μm. The notched Izod impact strength of the blend compatibilized with premade triblock copolymer was much higher than that of the neat PA6, the noncompatibilized, and the in situ reactively compatibilized polymerization blends. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 94: 2538–2544, 2004     

Morphology,thermal behavior,and mechanical properties of PA6/UHMWPE blends with HDPE‐g‐MAH as a compatibilizing agent

A functionalized high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) with maleic anhydride (MAH) was prepared using a reactive extruding method. This copolymer was used as a compatibilizer of blends of polyamide 6 (PA6) and ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE). Morphologies were examined by a scanning electron microscope. It was found that the dimension of UHMWPE and HDPE domains in the PA6 matrix decreased dramatically, compared with that of the uncompatibilized blending system. The size of the UHMWPE domains was reduced from 35 μm (PA6/UHMWPE, 80/20) to less than 4 μm (PA6/UHMWPE/HDPE‐g‐MAH, 80/20/20). The tensile strength and Izod impact strength of PA6/UHMWPE/HDPE‐g‐MAH (80/20/20) were 1.5 and 1.6 times as high as those of PA6/UHMWPE (80/20), respectively. This behavior could be attributed to chemical reactions between the anhydride groups of HDPE‐g‐MAH and the terminal amino groups of PA6 in PA6/UHMWPE/HDPE‐g‐MAH blends. Thermal analysis was performed to confirm that the above chemical reactions took place during the blending process. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 75: 232–238, 2000     

A Novel Approach to the Preparation of Nano-Blends of PPO/PS/PA6

Summary A novel approach of in situ polymerization and in situ compatibilization was adopted to prepare the nano-blend of poly (2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) (PPO), polystyrene (PS) and polyamide 6 (PA6). Anionic ring-opening polymerization of -caprolactam was carried out in the presence of PPO and PS. And PS, the chain of which bore methylmethacrylate (MMA) groups, acted as macroactivator to initiate PA6 chain growth from the PS chain and formed a graft copolymer of PS and PA6 and pure PA6 simultaneously. Thus the nano-structured PA6 dispersed phase in the PPO matrix could be achieved.     

Studies on mechanical and morphological behavior of hybrid nanoclay‐reinforced EPDM‐g‐TMEVS/PS blends

A new copolymer of tris(2‐methoxyethoxy) vinylsilane (TMEVS)‐grafted ethylene–propylene–diene elastomer (EPDM‐g‐TMEVS) has been developed by grafting of TMEVS onto EPDM by using dicumylperoxide (DCP) initiator. The linear polystyrene blends (EPDM‐g‐TMEVS/PS) based on EPDM‐g‐TMEVS have been synthesized with varying weight percentages of polystyrene in a twin‐screw extruder. In a similar manner, the dynamically vulcanized and nanoclay‐reinforced polystyrene blends have also been developed using DCP and organically modified montmorillonite clay separately by means of a twin‐screw extruder. The grafting of TMEVS onto EPDM at allylic position present in the third monomer of EPDM has been confirmed by Fourier Transform infrared spectroscopy. The effect of silane‐grafted EPDM and concentration of nanoclay on mechanical properties of polystyrene blends has been studied as per ASTM standards. The morphological behavior of these blends has been investigated using scanning electron microscope. It was observed that the incorporation of silane‐grafted EPDM enhanced the impact strength and the percentage elongation of linear‐ and dynamically vulcanized blends. However, the values of tensile strength, flexural strength, flexural modulus, and hardness of the blends were found to be decreasing with the increase of silane‐grafted EPDM. In the case of nanoclay‐reinforced polystyrene blends, the values of impact strength, tensile strength, flexural strength, flexural modulus, and hardness were increased with an increase in the concentration of nanoclay. XRD studies have been carried out to confirm the formation of nanoclay‐reinforced EPDM‐g‐TMEVS/PS blends. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

In situ control of co‐continuous phase morphology for PS/PS‐co‐TMI/PA6 blend

The emulsification efficiency of PS‐co‐TMI, a copolymer polymerized by styrene and 3‐isopropenyl‐α,α‐dimethylbenzene isocyanate (TMI), for polystyrene (PS)/polyamide 6 (PA6) blend was studied. During the mixing process, an effective emulsifier PS‐g‐PA6 was generated, which was demonstrated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. PS‐g‐PA6 generated by PS‐co‐TMI with high TMI content was found to contain some unreacted isocyanate active groups which reduced using efficiency of PS‐co‐TMI. Irrespective of TMI content in PS‐co‐TMI, the dosage of PS‐co‐TMI reached 20 wt %, unreacted PS‐co‐TMI was detected. These results indicated that reactive emulsification limits for both active groups' content and reactive precursors' dosage. After the rational addition of PS‐co‐TMI into PS/PA6 system, phase sizes of co‐continuous structure were reduced conspicuously. However, co‐continuous structure was evolved into matrix‐dispersed structure while the dosage of PS‐co‐TMI reached 20 wt %. Emulsification efficiencies of PS‐co‐TMI with different TMI contents, 2.2, 4.1, and 7.5 wt %, were compared. The results revealed PS‐co‐TMI with 2.2 wt % TMI content had the highest reactive emulsification efficiency because of the block‐copolymer‐inclined emulsifier generated in the mixing process. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2014 , 131, 39972.     

In situ compatibilization of polypropylene/polystyrene blend by controlled degradation and reactive extrusion

In situ compatibilization of polypropylene (PP) and polystyrene (PS) was achieved by combinative application of tetraethyl thiuram disulfide (TETD) as degradation inhibitor and di‐tert‐butyl peroxide as degradation initiator in the process of reactive extrusion. The PP/PS blends obtained were systematically investigated by rheological measurement, scanning electron microscopy, and differential scanning calorimetry. The results indicate that peroxide‐induced degradation of PP can be effectively depressed by adding TETD, which may favor the formation of PP‐g‐PS copolymer during melt processing. The PP‐g‐PS copolymer formed may act as an in situ compatibilizer for PP/PS blends, and subsequently decreases the size of dispersed PS phase and changes both rheological and thermal properties of the blends. Based on the present experimental results, the mechanisms for the controlled degradation of PP and in situ formation of PP‐g‐PS copolymer in the PP/PS blends have been proposed. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

A novel approach to the preparation of thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer and polyamide 6 blends by in situ anionic ring‐opening polymerization of ε‐caprolactam

Blends of thermoplastic polyether‐based urethane elastomer (TPEU) and monomer casting polyamide 6 (MCPA6) were prepared using ε‐caprolactam as reactive solvent, with caprolactam sodium as a catalyst in the presence of TPEU, with TPEU content varying from 2.5% to 10% by weight. In situ anionic ring‐opening polymerization and in situ compatibilization to prepare TPEU/MCPA6 blends were carried out in one step. The TPEU chains, which underwent thermal dissociation in amine solvents to bear isocyanate groups, acted as macroactivator to initiate MCPA6 chain growth from the TPEU chains and form graft copolymers of TPEU‐co‐MCPA6 to improve compatibility between TPEU and MCPA6. The structure and thermal properties were characterized by means of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, ¹H‐NMR spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetry and scanning electron microscopy. Copyright © 2006 Society of Chemical Industry     

Blends of poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC)/natural rubber‐g‐(styrene‐co‐methyl methacrylate) for improved impact resistance of PVC

To improve the mechanical properties of poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC), the possibility of combining PVC with elastomers was considered. Modification of natural rubber (NR) by graft copolymerization with methyl methacrylate (MMA) and styrene (St) was carried out by emulsion polymerization by using redox initiator to provide an impact modifier for PVC. The impact resistance, dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of St and MMA grafted NR [NR‐g‐(St‐co‐MMA)]/PVC (graft copolymer product contents of 5, 10, and 15%) blends were investigated as a function of the amount of graft copolymer product. It was found that the impact strength of blends was increased with an increase of the graft copolymer product content. DMA studies showed that NR‐g‐(St‐co‐MMA) has partial compatibility with PVC. SEM confirmed a shift from brittle failure to ductility with an increase graft copolymer content in the blends. The mechanical properties showed that NR‐g‐(St‐co‐MMA) interacts well with PVC and can also be used as an impact modifier for PVC. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 93: 1666–1672, 2004     

Reactive extrusion for the synthesis of nylon 12 and maleated low‐density polyethylene blends via the anionic ring‐opening polymerization of lauryllactam

Nylon 12 was successfully synthesized in a twin‐screw extruder via the anionic ring‐opening polymerization of lauryllactam (LL). Maleated low‐density polyethylene (LDPE–MAH) was added to improve the mechanical properties of nylon 12. The in situ blends of nylon 12 and LDPE–MAH were characterized by mechanical testing and scanning electron microscopy. With increasing LDPE–MAH content, the tensile strength and flexural strength decreased, whereas the blend had improved impact strength and achieved supertoughness when the content of LDPE–MAH was 30 wt %. In the in situ formed low‐density polyethylene‐g‐PA12 copolymer, the domain of the LDPE–MAH phase was finely dispersed in the nylon 12 matrix. The good interface between the two phases demonstrated that LDPE–MAH could be used as a macromolecular activator to induce the polymerization of LL. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Formation of bead‐free and core–shell superfine electrospinning fibers under the assistance of another polymer and an interfacial compatibilizer

This work presents a new way of preparing bead‐free and core–shell superfine polymer electrospinning fibers under the assistance of another polymer and an interfacial compatibilizer. For the electrospinning of polystyrene (PS)/CHCl₃ solution, the bead‐free fiber cannot be obtained until the PS concentration is above 0.25 g/mL but its average diameter is above 10 μm. Using polyamide 6 (PA6) as an additive, the critical concentration capable of forming bead‐free fiber greatly decreased and core–shell fibers with PA6 as the core and PS as the shell were obtained due to the driving effect of high spinability of PA6. The introduction of a copolymer (PS‐co‐TMI) of styrene (St) and 3‐isopropenyl‐α,α‐dimethylbenzene isocyanate (TMI) can react with amine of PA6 to form the copolymer of PS and PA6 as an interfacial compatibilizer. As a result, it can further enhance the dispersion and deformation of minor component PA6 into uniform microfiber core, and drive PS to uniformly cover the surface of PA6 fibers, and finally form bead‐free and core–shell superfine fibers. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 59:1437–1444 2019. © 2019 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Morphology and mechanical properties of polyamide‐6/K resin blends

Mechanical properties and morphological studies of compatibilized blends of polyamide‐6 (PA‐6)/K resin grafted with maleic anhydride (K‐g‐MAH) and PA‐6/K resin/K‐g‐MAH were investigated as functions of K resin/K‐g‐MAH and dispersed phase K resin concentrations, and all the blends were prepared using twin screw extruder followed by injection molding. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were used to assess the fracture surface morphology and the dispersion of the K resin in PA‐6 continuous phase, the results showing extensive deformation in presence of K‐g‐MAH, whereas, uncompatibilized PA‐6/K resin blends show dislodging of K resin domains from the PA‐6 matrix. Dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA) test reveals the partially miscibility of PA‐6 with K‐g‐MAH, and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) results further identified that the introduction of K‐g‐MAH greatly improved the miscibility between PA‐6 and K resin. The mechanical properties of PA‐6/K resin blends and K‐g‐MAH were studied through bending, tensile, and impact properties. The Izod notch impact strength of PA‐6/K‐g‐MAH blends increase with the addition of K‐g‐MAH, when the K‐g‐MAH content adds up to 20 wt %, the impact strength is as more than 6.2 times as pure PA‐6, and accompanied with small decrease in the tensile and bending strength less than 12.9% and 17.5%, respectively. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008