Miscibility and crystallization behavior of poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyvalerate)/poly(vinyl acetate) blends

The miscibility and crystallization behavior of poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyvalerate) (P(HB‐co‐HV))/poly(vinyl acetate) (PVAc) blends have been investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and polarized optical microscopy (POM). It was found that P(HB‐co‐HV)/PVAc blends were miscible in the melt over the whole compositions. Thus the blend exhibited a single glass transition temperature (T_g), which increased with increasing PVAc composition. The spherulitic morphologies of P(HB‐co‐HV)/PVAc blends indicated that the PVAc was predominantly segregated into P(HB‐co‐HV) interlamellar or interfibrillar regions during P(HB‐co‐HV) crystallization because of the volume‐filled spherulites. As to the crystallization kinetics study, it was found that the overall crystallization and crystal growth rates decreased with the addition of PVAc. The kinetics retardation was primarily attributed to the reduction of chain mobility and dilution of P(HB‐co‐HV) upon mixing with higher T_g PVAc. The overall crystallization rate was predominantly governed by the spherulitic growth rate and promoted by the samples treated with the quenched state because of the higher nucleation density. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 980–988, 2006     

Characterization of biodegradable polymers by inverse gas chromatography. II. Blends of amylopectin and poly(ε‐caprolactone)

Amylopectin (AP), a potato‐starch‐based polymer with a molecular weight of 6,000,000 g/mol, was blended with poly(ε‐caprolactone) (PCL) and characterized with inverse gas chromatography (IGC), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and X‐ray diffraction (XRD). Five different compositions of AP–PCL blends ranging from 0 to 100% AP were studied over a wide range of temperatures (80–260°C). Nineteen solutes (solvents) were injected onto five chromatographic columns containing the AP–PCL blends. These solutes probed the dispersive, dipole–dipole, and hydrogen‐bonding interactions, acid–base characteristics, wettability, and water uptake of the AP–PCL blends. Retention diagrams of these solutes in a temperature range of 80–260°C revealed two zones: crystalline and amorphous. The glass‐transition temperature (T_g) and melting temperature (T_m) of the blends were measured with these zones. The two zones were used to calculate the degree of crystallinity of pure AP and its blends below T_m, which ranged from 85% at 104°C to 0% at T_m. IGC complemented the DSC method for obtaining the T_g and T_m values of the pure AP and AP–PCL blends. These values were unexpectedly elevated for the blends over that of pure AP and ranged from 105 to 152°C for T_g and from 166 to 210°C for T_m. The T_m values agreed well with the XRD analysis data. This elevation in the T_g and T_m values may have been due to the change in the heat capacity at T_g and the dependence of T_g on various variables, including the molecular weight and the blend composition. Polymer blend/solvent interaction parameters were measured with a variety of solutes over a wide range of temperatures and determined the solubility of the blends in the solutes. We were also able to determine the blend compatibility over a wide range of temperatures and weight fractions. The polymer–polymer interaction coefficient and interaction energy parameter agreed well on the partial miscibility of the two polymers. The dispersive component of the surface energy of the AP–PCL blends was measured with alkanes and ranged from 16.09 mJ/m² for pure AP to 38.26 mJ/m² when AP was mixed with PCL in a 50/50% ratio. This revealed an increase in the surface energy of AP when PCL was added. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 101: 3076–3089, 2006     

Crystallization behavior of PEO in blends of poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(2‐vinyl pyridine)‐b‐(ethylene oxide) block copolymer

The crystallization behavior of two molecular weight poly(ethylene oxide)s (PEO) and their blends with the block copolymer poly(2‐vinyl pyridine)‐b‐poly(ethylene oxide) (P2VP‐b‐PEO) was investigated by polarized optical microscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, differential scanning calorimetry, and atomic force microscopy (AFM). A sharp decreasing of the spherulite growth rate was observed with the increasing of the copolymer content in the blend. The addition of P2VP‐b‐PEO to PEO increases the degradation temperature becoming the thermal stability of the blend very similar to that of the block copolymer P2VP‐b‐PEO. Glass transition temperatures, T_g, for PEO/P2VP‐b‐PEO blends were intermediate between those of the pure components and the value increased as the content of PEO homopolymer decreased in the blend. AFM images showed spherulites with lamellar crystal morphology for the homopolymer PEO. Lamellar crystal morphology with sheaf‐like lamellar arrangement was observed for 80 wt% PEO(200M) and a lamellar crystal morphology with grain aggregation was observed for 50 and 20 wt% blends. The isothermal crystallization kinetics of PEO was progressively retarded as the copolymer content in the blend increased, since the copolymer hinders the molecular mobility in the miscible amorphous phase. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2012. © 2011 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Miscibility and crystallization kinetics of poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyvalerate)/ poly(methyl methacrylate) blends

The miscibility and crystallization kinetics of the blends of random poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyvalerate) [P(HB‐co‐HV)] copolymer and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and polarized optical microscopy (POM). It was found that P(HB‐co‐HV)/PMMA blends were miscible in the melt. Thus the single glass‐transition temperature (T_g) of the blends within the whole composition range suggests that P(HB‐co‐HV) and PMMA were totally miscible for the miscible blends. The equilibrium melting point (T°_m) of P(HB‐co‐HV) in the P(HB‐co‐HV)/PMMA blends decreased with increasing PMMA. The T°_m depression supports the miscibility of the blends. With respect to the results of crystallization kinetics, it was found that both the spherulitic growth rate and the overall crystallization rate decreased with the addition of PMMA. The kinetics retardation was attributed to the decrease in P(HB‐co‐HV) molecular mobility and dilution of P(HB‐co‐HV) concentration resulting from the addition of PMMA, which has a higher T_g. According to secondary nucleation theory, the kinetics of spherulitic crystallization of P(HB‐co‐HV) in the blends was analyzed in the studied temperature range. The crystallizations of P(HB‐co‐HV) in P(HB‐co‐HV)/PMMA blends were assigned to n = 4, regime III growth process. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 91: 3595–3603, 2004     

Crystallization,morphology, and mechanical behavior of polylactide/poly(ε‐caprolactone) blends

Optically pure polylactides, poly(L ‐lactide) (PLLA) and poly(D ‐lactide) (PDLA), were blended across the range of compositions with poly(ε‐caprolactone) (PCL) to study their crystallization, morphology, and mechanical behavior. Differential scanning calorimetry and dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) of the PLA/PCL blends showed two T_gs at positions close to the pure components revealing phase separation. However, a shift in the tan δ peak position by DMA from 64 to 57°C suggests a partial solubility of PCL in the PLA‐rich phase. Scanning electron microscopy reveals phase separation and a transition in the phase morphology from spherical to interconnected domains as the equimolar blend approaches from the outermost compositions. The spherulitic growth of both PLA and PCL in the blends was followed by polarized optical microscopy at 140 and 37°C. From tensile tests at speed of 50 mm/min Young's modulus values between 5.2 and 0.4 GPa, strength values between 56 and 12 MPa, and strain at break values between 1 and 400% were obtained varying the blend composition. The viscoelastic properties (E′ and tan δ) obtained at frequency of 1 Hz by DMA are discussed and are found consistent with composition, phase separation, and crystallization behavior of the blends. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 46:1299–1308, 2006. © 2006 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Melting,crystallization behaviors,and nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of PET/PTT/PBT ternary blends

The melting, crystallization behaviors, and nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of the ternary blends composed of poly(ethylene terephthalate), poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) and poly(buthylene terephthalate) (PBT) were studied with differential scanning calorimeter (DSC). PBT content in all ternary blends was settled invariably to be one‐third, which improved the melt‐crystallization temperature of the ternary blends. All of the blend compositions in amorphous state were miscible as evidenced by a single, composition‐dependent glass transition temperature (T_g) observed in DSC curves. DSC melting thermograms of different blends showed different multiple melting and crystallization peaks because of their various polymer contents. During melt‐crystallization process, three components in blends crystallized simultaneously to form mixed crystals or separated crystals depending upon their content ratio. The Avrami equation modified by Jeziorny and the Ozawa theory were employed to describe the nonisothermal crystallization process of two selected ternary blends. The results spoke that the Avrami equation was successful in describing the nonisothermal crystallization process of the ternary blends. The values of the t_1/2 and the parameters Z_c showed that the crystallization rate of the ternary blends with more poly(ethylene terephthalate) content was faster than that with the lesser one at a given cooling rate. The crystal morphology of the five ternary blends investigated by polarized optical microscopy (POM) showed different size and distortional Maltese crosses or light spots when the PTT or poly(ethylene terephthalate) component varied, suggesting that the more the PTT content, the larger crystallites formed in ternary blends. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2007     

Nonisothermal crystallization kinetics and thermomechanical properties of multiwalled carbon nanotube‐reinforced poly(ε‐caprolactone) composites

BACKGROUND: The technological development of poly(ε‐caprolactone) (PCL) is limited by its short useful lifespan, low modulus and high crystallinity. There are a few papers dealing with the crystallization behavior of carbon nanotube‐reinforced PCL composites. However, little work has been done on the crystallization kinetics of melt‐compounded PCL/multiwalled carbon nanotube (MWNT) nanocomposites. In this study, PCL/MWNT nanocomposites were successfully prepared by a simple melt‐compounding method, and their morphology and mechanical properties as well as their crystallization kinetics were studied. RESULTS: The MWNTs were observed to be homogeneously dispersed throughout the PCL matrix. The incorporation of a very small quantity of MWNTs significantly improved the storage modulus and loss modulus of the PCL/MWNT nanocomposites. The nonisothermal crystallization behavior of the PCL/MWNT nanocomposites exhibits strong dependencies of the degree of crystallinity (X_c), peak crystallization temperature (T_p), half‐time of crystallization (t_1/2) and Avrami exponent (n) on the MWNT content and cooling rate. The MWNTs in the PCL/MWNT nanocomposites exhibit a higher nucleation activity. The crystallization activation energy (E_a) calculated with the Kissinger model is higher when a small amount of MWNTs is added, then gradually decreases; all the E_a values are higher than that of pure PCL. CONCLUSION: This paper reports for the first time the preparation of high‐performance biopolymer PCL/MWNT nanocomposites prepared by a simple melt‐compounding method. The results show that the PCL/MWNT nanocomposites can broaden the applications of PCL. Copyright © 2008 Society of Chemical Industry     

Miscibility and crystallization behavior of biodegradable poly(ε‐caprolactone)/tannic acid blends

Miscibility, isothermal melt crystallization kinetics, spherulitic morphology and growth rates, and crystal structure of completely biodegradable poly(ε‐caprolactone) (PCL)/tannic acid (TA) blends were studied by differential scanning calorimetry, polarized optical microscopy, and wide angle X‐ray diffraction in detail in this work. PCL and TA are miscible as evidenced by the single composition dependent glass transition temperature over the whole compositions range and the depression of equilibrium melting point of PCL in the PCL/TA blends. Isothermal melt crystallization kinetics of neat PCL and an 80/20 PCL/TA blend was investigated and analyzed by the Avrami equation. The overall crystallization rates of PCL decrease with increasing crystallization temperature for both neat PCL and the PCL/TA blend; moreover, the overall crystallization rate of PCL is slower in the PCL/TA blend than in neat PCL at a given crystallization temperature. However, the crystallization mechanism of PCL does not change despite crystallization temperature and the addition of TA. The spherulitic growth rates of PCL also decrease with increasing crystallization temperature for both neat PCL and the PCL/TA blend; moreover, blending with TA reduces the spherulitic growth rate of PCL in the PCL/TA blend. It is also found that the crystal structure of PCL is not modified in the PCL/TA blend. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Development of novel biopolymer blends based on poly(l‐lactic acid), poly((R)‐3‐hydroxybutyrate), and plasticizer

Poly(l ‐lactic acid) (PLLA), a biopolymer that can be derived from renewable resources, is known for its brittleness as a result of slow crystallization rates under supercooling conditions, which is associated with the formation of large spherulites. In addition, the glass transition temperature (T_g) of PLLA is 60°C, such that the polymer chain is immobile at room temperature. These disadvantages make PLLA unsuitable for use in the food packaging sector. In this research, biopolymer blends based on PLLA and poly((R)‐3‐hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), together with tributyl citrate (TBC) as a plasticizer, were developed. TBC was added to increase polymer chain mobility, and to decrease PLLA T_g from 60 to 10°C in blends. Furthermore, the addition of PHB as a nucleating agent to PLLA resulted in an increased proportion of smaller spherulites. Fourier‐transform infrared (FT‐IR) spectroscopy indicated that the carbonyl group and several other characteristic peaks in blends are shifted to lower wavenumber. In addition, polarized optical microscopy experiments confirmed the results of differential scanning calorimetry, FT‐IR, and wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction, showing that PHB enhances the crystallization behavior by acting as a bionucleation. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 54:1394–1402, 2014. © 2013 Society of Plastics Engineers     

The crystallization and transition behavior of poly(vinylidene fluoride)/copoly(chlorotriofluorethylene-vinylidene fluoride) blends

Thermal analysis of solution precipitated blends of two crystallizable polymers, poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) and copoly(chlorotrifluorethylene-vinylidene fluoride) (copoly(CTFE-VDF)), has been carried out to study the transition temperatures, crystallinity, and crystallization rates. PVDF crystallizes over the whole blend composition either during precipitation from solution or upon cooling from the melt. The high degree of crystallinity attained, higher than in PVDF by itself, suggests the occurrence of partial PVDF-copolymer cocrystallization. The melt crystallization temperature, decreasing with cooling rate, is lower in PVDF-rich blends than for lean blends. However, the heat of crystallization increases with cooling rate, suggesting that the crystal composition depends on crystallization rate. No significant melting temperature depression due to blending was observed. However, the blends glass transition (T_g) changes linearly with composition, but less than expected by any mixing rule applicable to compatible systems. Annealing of the blends above T_g results in an additional crystalline phase consisting mainly of the copolymer. The amount of these crystals increases with PVDF content, due to partial cocrystallization and kinetic effects. The addition of the copolymer to PVDF results in a volume-filling spherulitic structure consisting of spherulites which decrease in size with increasing copolymer content.     

Nonisothermal crystallization and melting behavior of β‐nucleated isotactic polypropylene and polyamide 66 blends

A highly novel nano‐CaCO₃ supported β‐nucleating agent was employed to prepare β‐nucleated isotactic polypropylene (iPP) blend with polyamide (PA) 66, β‐nucleated iPP/PA66 blend, as well as its compatibilized version with maleic anhydride grafted PP (PP‐g‐MA), maleic anhydride grafted polyethylene‐octene (POE‐g‐MA), and polyethylene‐vinyl acetate (EVA‐g‐MA), respectively. Nonisothermal crystallization behavior and melting characteristics of β‐nucleated iPP and its blends were investigated by differential scanning calorimeter and wide angle X‐ray diffraction. Experimental results indicated that the crystallization temperature (T) of PP shifts to high temperature in the non‐nucleated PP/PA66 blends because of the α‐nucleating effect of PA66. T of PP and the β‐crystal content (K_β) in β‐nucleated iPP/PA66 blends not only depended on the PA66 content, but also on the compatibilizer type. Addition of PP‐g‐MA and POE‐g‐MA into β‐nucleated iPP/PA66 blends increased the β‐crystal content; however, EVA‐g‐MA is not benefit for the formation of β‐crystal in the compatibilized β‐nucleated iPP/PA66 blend. It can be relative to the different interfacial interactions between PP and compatibilizers. The nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of PP in the blends was evaluated by Mo's method. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Thermal analysis and miscibility of chitin/polycaprolactone blends

Chitin/polycaprolactone (PCL) blends were prepared by melt-blending of chitin and PCL with varying amounts of chitin. Thermal analysis of DSC, DMTA, and FTIR were used to characterize the blends. Results showed that increases in the amount of chitin did not cause a decrease in either the melting point or the crystallization point of PCL. The loss-modulus curve did not show a change of glass-transition temperature (T_g) from a dynamic temperature ramp test, which revealed that the pure chitin/PCL blend was not miscible at any ratio. When chitin n-butyrate (CB) was partly substituted for chitin in the blend, both the melting point and crystallization point of the PCL component was depressed, which implied an improvement of the miscibility of the blend. Furthermore, FTIR characterization suggested an interaction between the components. However, T_g did not change compared to that of the pure PCL in the loss-modulus curve, that is to say, that the modification of the miscibility by the introduction of CB to the blend lay only in the interfacial region, although not at the molecular level. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 81: 3117–3123, 2001     

Miscibility windows in ternary polymer blends of a polyester,polymethacrylate and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)

Miscibility, phase diagrams and morphology of poly(ε‐caprolactone) (PCL)/poly(benzyl methacrylate) (PBzMA)/poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) ternary blends were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), optical microscopy (OM), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The miscibility window of PCL/PBzMA/SAN ternary blends is influenced by the acrylonitrile (AN) content in the SAN copolymers. At ambient temperature, the ternary polymer blend is completely miscible within a closed‐loop miscibility window. DSC showed only one glass transition temperature (T_g) for PCL/PBzMA/SAN‐17 and PCL/PBzMA/SAN‐25 ternary blends; furthermore, OM and SEM results showed that PCL/PBzMA/SAN‐17 and PCL/PBzMA/SAN‐25 were homogeneous for any composition of the ternary phase diagram. Hence, it demonstrated that miscibility exists for PCL/PBzMA/SAN‐17 and PCL/PBzMA/SAN‐25 ternary blends, but that the ternary system becomes phase‐separated outside these AN contents. Copyright © 2003 Society of Chemical Industry     

Dielectric investigation of the molecular dynamics in blends: polymers with similar molecular architecture (TMPC/PC blend)

Broad band dielectric spectroscopy was used in the investigation of the molecular dynamics and compatibility of tetramethyl polycarbonate/polycarbonate (TMPC/PC) blends. Frequency scan measurements in the range 10^?2?10^?5 Hz were carried out in the temperature range 50–220°C for several blends with different compositions, namely, 0, 12.5, 25, 50, 75, 87.5 and 100 wt% of TMPC. The results obtained show that these two polymers are ideally compatible over the entire composition range. The blends reveal only one common glass process. The dielectric relaxation strength and the common glass transition temperature, T_g, were found to vary linearly with composition. Moreover, it was found, surprisingly, that blending has no effect on the distribution of relaxation times of the common glass process of the blends. Furthermore, neither the kinetics (relaxation frequency at a certain temperature) nor the distribution of relaxation times of the local process were influenced by blending. It is concluded that the polymeric chains of the different components are not miscible on a segmental level although the blend exhibits only one glass transition temperature.     

Melt rheology of poly(ϵ‐caprolactone)/poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) blends

Dynamic viscoelastic properties for miscible blends of poly(?‐caprolactone) (PCL) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) were measured. It was found that the time–temperature superposition principle is applicable over the entire temperature range studied for the blends. The temperature dependency of the shift factors a_T can be expressed by the Williams–Landel–Ferry equation: log a_T = ?8.86(T ? T_s)/(101.6 + T ? T_s). The compositional dependency of T_s represents the Gordon–Taylor equation. The zero‐shear viscosities are found to increase concavely upward with an increase in weight fraction of SAN at constant temperature, but concavely downward at constant free volume fraction. It is concluded that the relaxation behavior of the PCL/SAN blends is similar to that of a blend consisting of homologous polymers. It is emphasized that the viscoelastic functions of the miscible blends should be compared in the iso‐free volume state. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 82: 2037–2041, 2001     

Compatibility of poly(butadiene‐co‐acrylonitrile) with poly(L‐lactide) and poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyvalerate)

Poly(L ‐lactide) (PLLA) and poly(3‐hydrobutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) were blended with poly(butadiene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (NBR). Both PLLA/NBR and PHBV/NBR blends exhibited higher tensile properties as the content of acrylonitrile unit (AN) of NBR increased from 22 to 50 wt %. However, two separate glass transition temperatures (T_g) appeared in PLLA/NBR blends irrespective of the content of NBR, revealing that PLLA was incompatible with NBR. In contrast, a single T_g, which shifted along with the blend composition, was observed for PHBV/NBR50 blends. Moreover NBR50 suppressed the crystallization of PHBV, indicating that PHBV was compatible with NBR50. Decrease of both elongation modulus and stress at maximum load was less significant and increase of elongation at break was more pronounced in PHBV/NBR50 blends than in PLLA/NBR50 blends. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 92: 3508–3513, 2004     

Enhanced crystallization rate and mechanical properties of poly(l‐lactic acid) by stereocomplexation with four‐armed poly(ϵ‐caprolactone)‐block‐poly(d‐lactic acid) diblock copolymer

Poly(l ‐lactic acid) (PLLA) was blended with a series of four‐armed poly(? ‐caprolactone)‐block ‐poly(d ‐lactic acid) (4a‐PCL‐b ‐PDLA) copolymers in order to improve its crystallization rate and mechanical properties. It is found that a higher content of 4a‐PCL‐b ‐PDLA copolymer or longer PDLA block in the copolymer lead to faster crystallization of the blend, which is attributed to the formation of stereocomplex crystallites between PLLA matrix and PDLA blocks of the 4a‐PCL‐b ‐PDLA copolymers. Meanwhile, the PDLA block can improve the miscibility between flexible PCL phase and PLLA phase, which is beneficial for improving mechanical properties. The tensile results indicate that the 10% 4a‐PCL_5k‐b ‐PDLA_5k/PLLA blend has the largest elongation at break of about 72% because of the synergistic effects of stereocomplexation between enantiomeric PLAs, multi‐arm structure and plasticization of PCL blocks. It is concluded that well‐controlled composition and content of 4a‐PCL‐b ‐PDLA copolymer in PLLA blends can significantly improve the crystallization rate and mechanical properties of the PLLA matrix. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry     

Part 7. Effects of poly(L‐lactide‐co‐ϵ‐caprolactone) on morphology,structure, crystallization,and physical properties of blends of poly(L‐lactide) and poly(ϵ‐caprolactone)

Blended films of poly(L ‐lactide) [ie poly(L ‐lactic acid)] (PLLA) and poly(?‐caprolactone) (PCL) without or mixed with 10 wt% poly(L ‐lactide‐co‐?‐caprolactone) (PLLA‐CL) were prepared by solution‐casting. The effects of PLLA‐CL on the morphology, phase structure, crystallization, and mechanical properties of films have been investigated using polarization optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, differential scanning calorimetry and tensile testing. Addition of PLLA‐CL decreased number densities of spherulites in PLLA and PCL films, and improved the observability of spherulites and the smoothness of cross‐section of the PLLA/PCL blend film. The melting temperatures (T_m) of PLLA and PCL in the films remained unchanged upon addition of PLLA‐CL, while the crystallinities of PLLA and PCL increased at PLLA contents [X_PLLA = weight of PLLA/(weight of PLLA and PCL)] of 0.4–0.7 and at most of the X_PLLA values, respectively. The addition of PLLA‐CL improved the tensile strength and the Young modulus of the films at X_PLLA of 0.5–0.8 and of 0–0.1 and 0.5–0.8, respectively, and the elongation at break of the films at all the X_PLLA values. These findings strongly suggest that PLLA‐CL was miscible with PLLA and PCL, and that the dissolved PLLA‐CL in PLLA‐rich and PCL‐rich phases increased the compatibility between these two phases. © 2003 Society of Chemical Industry     

Morphology and nonisothermal crystallization of a polyacetal/poly(ε‐caprolactone) reactive blend prepared via a chain‐transfer reaction

A polyacetal (POM)/poly(ε‐caprolactone) (PCL) reactive blend prepared via a chain‐transfer reaction was investigated with respect to its morphology and nonisothermal crystallization, and the results were compared with those of a simple POM/PCL blend. The reactive blend had a microscopically phase‐separated morphology in which the diameter of the PCL microphase was below 100 nm, and it clearly yielded ring‐banded spherulites, whereas between the two blends, there were no significant differences in the diameters and polygonal edges of the spherulites and in the long period of the POM phases. The PCL part of the reactive blend crystallized within the confined microspace with about 10% lower crystallinity than that of the corresponding simple blend. A lower Avrami exponent and crystallization rate parameter of the PCL part were observed in the primary crystallization process of the reactive blend. In contrast, the crystallinity of the POM component and the nonisothermal crystallization kinetic parameters of the POM part showed no noticeable differences between the two blends at any given cooling rate. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Sequence analysis and fiber properties of a blend of poly(ethylene terephthalate) and poly(ethylene terephthalate‐co‐4,4′‐bibenzoate)

Blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and poly(ethylene terephthalate‐co‐4,4′‐ bibenzoate) (PETBB) are prepared by coextrusion. Analysis by ¹³C‐NMR spectroscopy shows that little transesterification occurs during the blending process. Additional heat treatment of the blend leads to more transesterification and a corresponding increase in the degree of randomness, R. Analysis by differential scanning calorimetry shows that the as‐extruded blend is semicrystalline, unlike PETBB15, a random copolymer with the same composition as the non‐ random blend. Additional heat treatment of the blend leads to a decrease in the melting point, T_m, and an increase in glass transition temperature, T_g. The T_m and T_g of the blend reach minimum and maximum values, respectively, after 15 min at 270°C, at which point the blend has not been fully randomized. The blend has a lower crystallization rate than PET and PETBB55 (a copolymer containing 55 mol % bibenzoate). The PET/PETBB55 (70/30 w/w) blend shows a secondary endothermic peak at 15°C above an isothermal crystallization temperature. The secondary peak was confirmed to be the melting of small and/or imperfect crystals resulting from secondary crystallization. The blend exhibits the crystal structure of PET. Tensile properties of the fibers prepared from the blend are comparable to those of PET fiber, whereas PETBB55 fibers display higher performance. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 93: 1793–1803, 2004