Testing by fourier transform infrared species variation during melamine–urea–formaldehyde resin preparation

The preparation of an industrially used sequential formulation of a melamine–urea–formaldehyde resin was followed with Fourier transform infrared (FTIR). The analysis allowed us to identify the increases and decreases of the main groups in the resin and to compare this system of resin analysis with results previously obtained by ¹³C‐NMR analysis. The FTIR analysis, although considerably more limited than ¹³C‐NMR analysis, allowed us nonetheless to identify and follow the appearance, increase, decrease, and disappearance of several of the main chemical groups during the preparation of the initial urea–formaldehyde (UF) phase of the reaction and the subsequent reaction of melamine with the UF resin that was formed. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 2007     

Synthesis–structure–performance relationship of cocondensed phenol–urea–formaldehyde resins by MALDI‐ToF and 13C NMR

Matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight (MALDI‐ToF) mass spectrometry has consistently confirmed on a number of PUF resins that phenol–urea cocondensates exist in phenol–urea–formaldehyde (PUF) resins. A noticeable proportion of methylene‐linked phenol to urea cocondensates were detected in all the PUF resins tried, alongside methylene bridges connecting phenol to phenol and urea to urea. The PUF, PF, and UF oligomers formed were identified. Variations of the PUF preparation procedure did always yield a certain proportion of the mixed phenol to urea cocondensates. Their relative proportion was determined and related the synthesis procedure used. Comparison of the MALDI‐ToF results with a ¹³C NMR investigation showed that in a real PUF resin in which phenol to urea cocondensates were identified the methylene bridge NMR signal at 44 ppm, characteristic of phenol to urea unsubstituted model compound cocondensates, does not appear at all. This confirmed that this peak cannot be taken as an indication of the existence of phenol and urea condensation under actual resin preparation conditions. The peak indicating cocondensation in PUF resins in which the phenolic nuclei and urea are substituted appears instead at 54.7–55.0 ppm. Thermomechanical analysis has again confirmed that the resin gel times greatly accelerates with increasing urea molar content. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Uron and uron–urea‐formaldehyde resins

The favored pH ranges for the formation of urons in urea‐formaldehyde (UF) resins preparation were determined, these being at pH's higher than 6 and lower than 4 at which the equilibrium urons ↔ N,N′‐dimethylol ureas are shifted in favor of the cyclic uron species. Shifting the pH slowly during the preparation from one favorable range to the other causes shift in the equilibrium and formation of a majority of methylol ureas species, whereas a rapid change in pH does not cause this to any great extent. UF resins in which uron constituted as much as 60% of the resin were prepared and the procedure to maximize the proportion of uron present at the end of the reaction is described. Uron was found to be present in these resins also as linked by methylene bridges to urea and other urons and also as methylol urons, the reactivity of the methylol group of this latter having been shown to be much lower than that of the same group in methylol ureas. Thermomechanical analysis (TMA) tests and tests on wood particleboard prepared with uron resins to which relatively small proportions of urea were added at the end of the reaction were capable of gelling and yielding bonds of considerable strength. Equally, mixing a uron‐rich resin with a low F/U molar ratio UF resin yielded resins of greater strength than a simple UF of corresponding molar ratio indicating that UF resins of lower formaldehyde emission with still acceptable strength could be prepared with these resins. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 72: 277–289, 1999     

Syntheses and properties of low‐level melamine‐modified urea–melamine–formaldehyde resins

Syntheses of urea–melamine–formaldehyde (UMF) resins were studied using 2–12% melamine levels and UF base resins that were preadvanced to various different extents. The melamine reaction was carried out at pH 6.3 with F/(U + M) mole ratio of 2.1 until a target viscosity of V was reached (Gardener–Holdt) and then the second urea added at pH 8.0 to give a final F/(U + M) mole ratio of 1.15. Analyses with ¹³C‐NMR and viscosity measurements showed that MF components react fast and the UF components very slowly in the melamine reaction. Therefore, as the extent of preadvancement of UF base resin was decreased, the reaction time to reach the target viscosity became longer and the MF resin components showed high degrees of polymerization. The overpolymerization of MF components resulted in increasingly more opaque resins, with viscosity remaining stable for more than a month. As the preadvancement of UF base resin was increased, the extent of advancement of MF components decreased, to give clearer resins, with viscosity slowly increasing at room temperature. Overall, preadvancing the UF base resin components to an appropriate extent was found to be a key to synthesizing various low‐level melamine‐modified UMF resins. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 93: 2559–2569, 2004     

Melamine‐bridged alkyl resorcinol modified urea–formaldehyde resin for bonding hardwood plywood

A powdery product was obtained by the reaction of methylolated melamine with alkyl resorcinols to form melamine‐bridged alkyl resorcinols (MARs). The effects of the addition of this powder on the bonding strength and formaldehyde emission of urea–formaldehyde (UF) resins were investigated. Three types of UF resins with a formaldehyde/urea molar ratio of 1.3 synthesized by condensation at pH 1.0 (UF‐1.0), pH 4.5 (UF‐4.5), and pH 5.0 (UF‐5.0) were fabricated. The addition of MAR to UF‐4.5 and UF‐5.0 for bonding hardwood plywood enhanced the bonding strength and reduced formaldehyde emission. For UF‐1.0, the addition of MAR adversely affected the bonding strength. However, the UF‐1.0 resin yielded the lowest formaldehyde emission of all of the UF resins in the study. The effects of the MAR addition were related to the molecular structures of the UF resins. UF‐1.0 contained a large amount of free urea, a considerable number of urons, and a highly methylene‐linked, ring‐structured higher molecular weight fraction and had a smaller number of methylol groups. Therefore, the addition of MAR was considered to cause a shortage of the methylol groups, which in turn, led to incomplete resin curing. In contrast to UF‐1.0, UF‐5.0 contained a smaller amount of free urea and a linearly structured higher molecular weight fraction and had a larger number of methylol groups. In this case, MAR was considered to effectively react with the methylol groups to develop a three‐dimensional crosslinked polymer network to enhance the bonding strength and suppress the generation of free formaldehyde to reduce formaldehyde emission. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

Examination of selected synthesis parameters for typical wood adhesive‐type urea–formaldehyde resins by 13C‐NMR spectroscopy. II

A particleboard adhesive‐type urea–formaldehyde (UF) resin was made at a formaldehyde ratio of 2.10 and added with a second urea at low temperature to the typical final formaldehyde/urea ratio of 1.15. Time samples taken during heat treatments of the resin sample up to 70°C over a period of 250 min showed decreases in Type II/IIi hydroxymethyl group content, accompanied with decreases in resin sample viscosity and increases in formaldehyde emission of bonded particleboards. The results indicate that various hydroxymethyl groups of polymeric UF resin components migrate to the second urea to form Type I hydroxymethyl groups. Time samples taken during the room‐temperature storage of the resin sample over a period of 1 month behaved similarly initially, but in the later stage, some polymerization progressed, shown by increases in viscosity and methylene and methylene–ether group contents. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 75: 1243–1254, 2000     

Examination of selected synthesis and room‐temperature storage parameters for wood adhesive‐type urea–formaldehyde resins by 13C‐NMR spectroscopy. V

The effects of posttreatments of particleboard adhesive‐type urea–formaldehyde resins were studied. The resins were synthesized with formaldehyde/first urea (F/U₁) mol ratios of 1.40, 1.60, 1.80, 2.10, and 2.40 and then the second urea was added to give a final formaldehyde/urea ratio of 1.15 in alkaline pH. The resins were posttreated at 60°C for up to 13.5 h and the 2.5‐h heat‐treated resin samples were stored at room temperature for up to 27 days. Resins sampled during the posttreatments were examined by ¹³C‐NMR and evaluated by bonding particleboards. In the posttreatments, hydroxymethyl groups on the polymeric resin components dissociated to formaldehyde and reacted with the second urea, and methylene and methylene–ether groups were formed from reactions involving the second urea. Methylene–diurea and urea groups bonded to UF polymers were identified. As a result, the viscosity of the resins initially decreased but later increased along with the cloudiness of the resins. Bond‐strength and formaldehyde‐emission values of particleboard varied with posttreatment variables as well as with the F/U₁ mol ratios used in the resin syntheses. The results would be useful in optimizing resin synthesis and handling parameters. Various reaction mechanisms were considered. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 89: 1896–1917, 2003     

Evaluation of melamine‐modified urea‐formaldehyde resins as particleboard binders

Particleboards bonded with 6 and 12% melamine‐modified urea‐formaldehyde (UMF) resins were manufactured using two different press temperatures and press times and the mechanical properties, water resistance, and formaldehyde emission (FE) values of boards were measured in comparison to a typical urea‐formaldehyde (UF) resin as control. The formaldehyde/(urea + melamine) (F/(U + M)) mole ratio of UMF resins and F/U mole ratio of UF resins were 1.05, 1.15, and 1.25 that encompass the current industrial values near 1.15. UMF resins exhibited better physical properties, higher water resistance, and lower FE values of boards than UF resin control for all F/(U + M) mole ratios tested. Therefore, addition of melamine at these levels can provide lower FE and maintain the physical properties of boards. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 2007     

Colloidal aggregation of aminoplastic polycondensation resins: Urea–formaldehyde versus melamine–formaldehyde and melamine–urea–formaldehyde resins

Colloidal particles formation followed by their clustering have been shown to be the normal way of ageing of aminoplastic resins, namely urea–formaldehyde (UF) resins, melamine–formaldehyde (MF) resins, and melamine–urea–formaldehyde (MUF) resins. Ageing or further advancement of the resin by other means such as longer condensation times causes whitening of the resin. This is a macroscopic indication of both the formation of colloidal particles and of their clustering. It eventually progresses to resins, which are mostly in colloidal, clustered state, followed much later on by a supercluster formation starting to involve the whole resin. The initial, filament‐like colloidal aggregates formed by UF resins have different appearance than the globular ones formed by MF resins. MUF resins present a short rod‐like appearance hybrid between the two. GPC has been shown to detect the existence of colloidal superaggregates in a UF resin, while smaller aggregates might not be detected at all. The star‐like structures visible in the colloidal globules of MF resins are likely to be light interference patterns of the early colloidal structures in the resins. These star‐like interference patterns become more complex with resin ageing or advancement due to the advancement of the resin to more complex aggregates, to eventually reach the stage in which filament‐like and rod‐like structures start to appear. The next step is formation of globular masses that are representative of the true start of physical gelation. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 1406–1412, 2006     

The reaction in water of UF resins with isocyanates at short curing times: A 13C NMR investigation

CP MAS ¹³C NMR spectra of hardened resins have shown that urethane bridges derived from the reaction of the isocyanate group with the hydroxymethyl group of urea do form even at fast curing times comparable to what was used in the wood panels industry, in lower proportions than what was shown earlier. Polyureas and biurets obtained from the reaction of isocyanate with water are the predominant crosslinking reactions of pMDI alone and in UF/pMDI resin systems under fast curing conditions. Residual, unreacted isocyanate groups in the hardened network are consistently observed. Their proportion markedly decreases when the original proportion of urea–formaldehyde (UF) resin is high and that of pMDI is low. Under these fast curing conditions, the UF resin appears to self‐condense through an unusually high proportion of methylene ether links rather than methylene bridges alone. A marked proportion of residual, unreacted hydroxymethyl groups is also noticeable, initially, in the UF self‐condensation network. Direct NMR tests on thin hardboard bonded under fast pressing conditions with different proportions of UF/pMDI confirmed that crosslinking due to polyureas and biurets formation are predominant in the crosslinking of pMDI when alone and in UF/pMDI resin systems. They confirmed that residual, unreacted isocyanate groups are present in the finished panel. Their proportion is higher when the proportion of pMDI in the system is high. The presence or absence of urethanes could not be confirmed directly on the panels as the relevant peaks are masked by the wood carbohydrates signals of wood cellulose and hemicelluloses. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 1624–1632, 2006     

13C‐NMR, 13C‐13C gCOSY,and ESI‐MS characterization of ether‐bridged condensation products in N,N′‐dimethylurea‐formaldehyde systems

The reaction of urea with formaldehyde is the basis for the production of urea‐formaldehyde (UF) resins which are widely applied in the wood industry. The presence of ether‐bridged condensation products in the UF resin reaction system is an open question in the literature. It is addressed in the present work. The N,N′‐dimethylurea‐formaldehyde model system was studied since it is chemically similar to the UF resin reaction system but allows for a simple elucidation of all reaction products. It was analyzed by ¹³C‐NMR spectroscopy and ESI‐MS. In corresponding NMR and MS spectra, peaks due to methoxymethylenebis(dimethyl)urea and its hemiformal were observed. ¹³C‐¹³C gCOSY analysis was conducted using labeled ¹³C‐formaldehyde. The correlation spectra showed evidence for an ether‐bridged compound and mass spectra exhibited peaks agreeing with labeled methoxymethylenebis(dimethyl)urea and its hemiformal. Methoxymethylenebis(dimethyl)urea was characterized in N,N′‐dimethylurea‐formaldehyde systems in acidic and slightly basic media. As urea is very similar to N,N′‐dimethylurea, the results of this work strengthen the assumption that ether‐bridged condensation products are likely to form in UF resins. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2013     

Curing of low level melamine‐modified urea‐formaldehyde particleboard binder resins studied with dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA)

Effects of resin formulation, catalyst, and curing temperature were studied for particleboard binder‐type urea‐formaldehyde (UF) and 6 ～ 12% melamine‐modified urea‐melamine‐formaldehyde (UMF) resins using the dynamic mechanical analysis method at 125 ～ 160°C. In general, the UF and UMF resins gelled and, after a relatively long low modulus period, rapidly vitrified. The gel times shortened as the catalyst level and resin mix time increased. The cure slope of the vitrification stage decreased as the catalyst mix time increased, perhaps because of the deleterious effects of polymer advancements incurred before curing. For UMF resins, the higher extent of polymerization effected for UF base resin in resin synthesis increased the cure slope of vitrification. The cure times taken to reach the vitrification were longer for UMF resins than UF resins and increased with increased melamine levels. The thermal stability and rigidity of cured UMF resins were higher than those of UF resins and also higher for resins with higher melamine levels, to indicate the possibility of bonding particleboard with improved bond strength and lower formaldehyde emission. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 97: 377–389, 2005     

Low‐volatility acetals to upgrade the performance of melamine–urea–formaldehyde wood adhesive resins

1,1,2,2‐Tetramethoxyethane (TME), a high boiling point acetal derived from glyoxol, lhas been shown to upgrade the performance of melamine‐urea‐formaldehyde (MUF) and some UF resins used for wood adhesives. This affords the possibility of decreasing the percentage of resin used in the preparation of wood panels without volatilizing the TME acetal used.     

Examination of selected synthesis and room‐temperature storage parameters for wood adhesive‐type urea–formaldehyde resins by 13C‐NMR spectroscopy. IV

Typical particleboard wood‐adhesive urea–formaldehyde (UF) resins, synthesized with formaldehyde/first urea (F/U₁) mol ratios of 1.80, 2.10, and 2.40 and the second urea added to an overall F/U ratio of 1.15, in weak alkaline pH, were allowed to stand at room temperature over a period of 50 days. ¹³C‐NMR of time samples taken over the storage period showed gradual migration of hydroxymethyl groups from the polymeric first‐urea components to the monomeric second‐urea components and also an advancing degree of polymerization of resins by forming methylene and methylene ether groups involving the second urea. These phenomena that varied with the F/U₁ mol ratios used in the resin syntheses due to the varying polymer branching structures resulted in the first step of resin synthesis. Varying viscosity decreases and increases of the resins also occurred. Due to these chemical and physical changes, the particleboards that bonded with the sampled resins showed varying bond strength and formaldehyde‐emission values, indicating process optimizations possible to improve bonding and formaldehyde‐emission performances. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 82: 1155–1169, 2001     

13C NMR investigation of the reaction in water of UF resins with blocked emulsifiable isocyanates

A solid state ¹³C NMR study of hardened networks obtained by the reaction of blocked and nonblocked isocyanates (pMDI) with urea‐formaldehyde (UF) resins in water showed different results according to the temperature of the reaction. At high temperature, in water, both a nonblocked or an emulsifiable, blocked isocyanate, appear to crosslink with UF resins through the formation both of traditional methylene bridges connecting urea to urea and of urethane bridges. The latter have been confirmed by ¹³C NMR to form in water by reaction of the isocyanate ? N?C?O group with the hydroxymethyl groups of the UF resin. At ambient temperature, UF/pMDI resins where the pMDI is a emulsifiable blocked isocyanate, do not appear to form urethanes to any great extent but rather to crosslink through the usual UF resin urea to urea methylene bridges. Even in this case, when urethane bridges appear to be absent, evidence of crosslinking in water through reaction of the isocyanate with the ? NH₂ and ? NH? amide of the UF resin has not been observed. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 99: 589–596, 2006     

Influence of acrylamide copolymerization of urea–formaldehyde resin adhesives to their chemical structure and performance

To lower the formaldehyde emission of wood‐based composite panels bonded with urea–formaldehyde (UF) resin adhesive, this study investigated the influence of acrylamide copolymerization of UF resin adhesives to their chemical structure and performance such as formaldehyde emission, adhesion strength, and mechanical properties of plywood. The acrylamide‐copolymerized UF resin adhesives dramatically reduced the formaldehyde emission of plywood. The ¹³C‐NMR spectra indicated that the acrylamide has been copolymerized by reacting with either methylene glycol remained or methylol group of UF resin, which subsequently contributed in lowering the formaldehyde emission. In addition, an optimum level for the acrylamide for the copolymerization of UF resin adhesives was determined as 1%, when the formaldehyde emission and adhesion strength of plywood were taken into consideration. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

NMR study of the stabilities of urea–formaldehyde resin components toward hydrolytic treatments

The solid residues of nine urea–formaldehyde (UF) resins after hydrolytic treatment at pH4 and 86°C for 20 h and the solid residues of one UF resin after eight different hydrolytic treatments were examined by ¹³C-CP–MAS NMR. The relative stability toward hydrolysis of each structural component in each UF resin was established for various hydrolytic conditions. In general, UF resins prepared from starting mixtures with a formal F/U molar ratio of 1.00 show a high degree of stability toward hydrolysis. Cross-linking methylene linkages in the UF resins show a higher susceptibility to hydrolytic treatments at pH 4 and 86°C than do linear methylene linkages. UF resins prepared with an F/U molar ratio of 2.00 are susceptible to hydrolysis at pH 4 and 86°C. Dimethylene ether linkages, methylols attached to tertiary amides, and poly(oxymethylene glycol) moieties are probably the main formaldehyde emitters in UF resin products. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Variation of MUF and PMUF resins mass fractions during preparation

The variation of molecular mass distribution with the progress of the reaction was studied for the following: (i) sequential‐type melamine–urea–formaldehyde (MUF) resin formulations in which the sequence of addition of chemicals follows well‐defined species reactivity principles; (ii) a nonsequential MUF formulation in which simultaneous melamine and urea competition for formaldehyde yields a MF resin cocondensed with small amounts of urea. This resin became soaked with reacted and unreacted monomeric urea species. (iii) A PMUF resin, namely a MUF resin with a small proportion of phenol (7.8% by weight on melamine and urea) cocondensed with the main MUF fraction. All the formulations used were industrial resins formulations in current use. Development and variation of molecular mass fractions, from which performance and other useful resin parameters depend, have been found to depend on the type of resin formulation used for these type of aminoplastic resins. The two very different MUF resin formulations yielded different variations in molecular mass fractions during the progress of the reaction and during the so‐called ambient temperature “maturing” of the resin. The PMUF resin also showed both similar and different fractions present during manufacturing and during short term ageing at ambient temperature. While similarities in recurrent fractions and in trends are common to all the three different formulations, differences between them are also clearly observed. A major proportion of the reaction of some of the aminoplastic resins examined also occurs on ageing (i.e.“maturing” of the resin at ambient temperature), this appearing to be an essential phase of the resin preparation process. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 4842–4855, 2006     

Urea–formaldehyde‐resin gel time as affected by the pH value,solid content,and catalyst

An experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of the resin solid content, catalyst content, and pH value obtained by the addition of two kinds of catalysts on the gel time of a urea–formaldehyde (UF) resin. Upon the addition of ammonium chloride, the pH value of the resin mixture decreased to 7 but not significantly further because of the limited free formaldehyde in the system. The pH values of the critical points, at which the resin‐curing rate dramatically increased and the gel time was reduced, were above 7 for both catalysts. To achieve the same gel time, the required pH value of the UF resin adjusted with ammonium chloride was higher than that of the resin modified by hydrochloric acid. This indicated that the main effects of ammonium chloride on the UF‐resin cure included both the release of hydrochloric acid and the catalysis of the reactants in the UF‐resin system. The gel time of the UF resin obviously decreased with increasing catalyst and resin solid contents and with decreasing pH. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 103: 1566–1569, 2007     

Production of melamine fortified urea‐formaldehyde resins with low formaldehyde emission

Melamine can be incorporated in the synthesis of urea‐formaldehyde (UF) resins to improve performance in particleboards (PB), mostly in terms of hydrolysis resistance and formaldehyde emission. In this work, melamine‐fortified UF resins were synthesized using a strong acid process. The best step for melamine addition and the effect of the reaction pH on the resin characteristics and performance were evaluated. Results showed that melamine incorporation is more effective when added on the initial acidic stage. The condensation reaction pH has a significant effect on the synthesis process. A pH below 3.0 results on a very fast reaction that is difficult to control. On the other hand, with pH values above 5.0, the condensation reaction becomes excessively slow. PBs panels produced with resins synthesized with a condensation pH between 4.5 and 4.7 showed good overall performance, both in terms of internal bond strength and formaldehyde emissions. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012