Blend composition dependence of the compatibilizing efficiency of graft copolymers for immiscible polymer blends

This work is concerned with the dependence of the compatibilizing efficiency of graft copolymers on the composition of immiscible polymer blends. A series of graft copolymers of polystyrene (PS) and polyamide 6 (PA6), denoted as PS‐g‐PA6, with different molecular structures were used as compatibilizers. The PS‐g‐PA6 was more efficient for the PS/PA6 (80/20) blend than for the PS/PA6 (20/80) one, indicating that a graft copolymer whose backbone and grafts match the matrix and the disperse phase polymers, respectively, has higher compatibilizing efficiency. This is in disagreement with the literature. Moreover, whatever the blend composition, for PS‐g‐PA6 graft copolymers with the same backbone and the same number of grafts per backbone, the longer the grafts, the higher their compatibilizing and stabilizing efficiency; for a given backbone/graft mass ratio, the longer the grafts and concomitantly the smaller the number of grafts per backbone, the higher the compatibilizing and stabilizing efficiency of the graft copolymer. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2010. © 2010 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Blends of poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene oxide)/polyamide 6 toughened by maleated polystyrene‐based copolymers: Mechanical properties,morphology, and rheology

Poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene oxide)/polyamide 6 (PPO/PA6 30/70) blends were impact modified by addition of three kinds of maleated polystyrene‐based copolymers, i.e., maleated styrene‐ethylene‐butylene‐styrene copolymer (SEBS‐g‐MA), maleated methyl methacrylate‐butadiene‐styrene copolymer (MBS‐g‐MA), and maleated acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene copolymer (ABS‐g‐MA). The mechanical properties, morphology and rheological behavior of the impact modified PPO/PA6 blends were investigated. The selective location of the maleated copolymers in one phase or at interface accounted for the different toughening effects of the maleated copolymer, which is closely related to their molecular structure and composition. SEBS‐g‐MA was uniformly dispersed in PPO phase and greatly toughened PPO/PA6 blends even at low temperature. MBS‐g‐MA particles were mainly dispersed in the PA6 phase and around the PPO phase, resulting in a significant enhancement of the notched Izod impact strength of PPO/PA6 blends from 45 J/m to 281 J/m at the MBS‐g‐MA content of 20 phr. In comparison, the ABS‐g‐MA was mainly dispersed in PA6 phase without much influencing the original mechanical properties of the PPO/PA6 blend. The different molecule structure and selective location of the maleated copolymers in the blends were reflected by the change of rheological behavior as well. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

Relationship between branch length and the compatibilizing effect of polypropylene‐g‐polystyrene graft copolymer on polypropylene/polystyrene blends

Three polypropylene‐g‐polystyrene (PP‐g‐PS) graft copolymers with the same branch density but different branch lengths were evaluated as compatibilizing agents for PP/PS blends. The morphological and rheological results revealed that the addition of PP‐g‐PS graft copolymers significantly reduced the PS particle size and enhanced the interfacial adhesion between PP and PS phases. Furthermore, it is verified that the branch length of PP‐g‐PS graft copolymer had opposite effects on its compatibilizing effect: on one hand, increasing the branch length could improve the compatibilizing effect of graft copolymer on PP/PS blends, demonstrated by the reduction of PS particle size and the enhancement of interfacial adhesion; on the other hand, increasing the branch length would increase the melt viscosity of PP‐g‐PS graft copolymer, which prevented it from migrating effectively to the interface of blend components. Additionally, the crystallization and melting behaviors of PP and PP/PS blends were compared. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014 , 131, 40126.     

Effect of in situ synthesized macroactivator on morphology of PA6/PS blends via successive polymerization

In situ polymerization and in situ compatibilization was adopted for preparation of ternary PA6/PS‐g‐PA6/PS blends by means of successive polymerization of styrene, with TMI and ε‐caprolactam, via free radical copolymerization and anionic ring‐opening polymerization, respectively. Copolymer poly(St‐g‐TMI), the chain of which bears isocyanate (? NCO), acts as a macroactivator to initiate PA6 chain growth from the PS chain and graft copolymer of PS‐g‐PA6 and pure PA6 form, simultaneously. The effect of the macroactivator poly(St‐g‐TMI) on the phase morphology was investigated in detail, using scanning electron microscopy. In case of blends with higher content of PS‐g‐PA6 copolymer, copolymer nanoparticles coexisting with the PS formed the matrix, in which PA6 microspheres were dispersed evenly as minor phase. The content of the compositions (homopolystyrene, homopolyamide 6, and PS‐g‐PA6) of the blends were determined by selective solvent extraction technique. The mechanical properties of PA6/PS‐g‐PA6/PS blends were better than that of PA6/PS blends. Especially for the blends T10 with lower PS‐g‐PA6 copolymer content, both the flexural strength and flexural modulus showed significantly improving because of the improved interfacial adhesion between PS and PA6. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 2007     

Synthesis and characterization of graft copolymers of syndiotactic polystyrene with polybutadiene and 4‐methylstyrene

The basic method for synthesizing syndiotactic polystyrene‐g‐polybutadiene graft copolymers was investigated. First, the syndiotactic polystyrene copolymer, poly(styrene‐co‐4‐methylstyrene), was prepared by the copolymerization of styrene and 4‐methylstyrene monomer with a trichloro(pentamethyl cyclopentadienyl) titanium(IV)/modified methylaluminoxane system as a metallocene catalyst at 50°C. Then, the polymerization proceeded in an argon atmosphere at the ambient pressure, and after purification by extraction, the copolymer structure was confirmed with ¹H‐NMR. Lastly, the copolymer was grafted with polybutadiene (a ready‐made commercialized unsaturated elastomer) by anionic grafting reactions with a metallation reagent. In this step, poly(styrene‐co‐4‐methylstyrene) was deprotonated at the methyl group of 4‐methylstyrene by butyl lithium and further reacted with polybutadiene to graft polybutadiene onto the deprotonated methyl of the poly(styrene‐co‐4‐methylstyrene) backbone. After purification of the graft copolymer by Soxhlet extraction, the grafting reaction copolymer structure was confirmed with ¹H‐NMR. These graft copolymers showed high melting temperatures (240–250°C) and were different from normal anionic styrene–butadiene copolymers because of the presence of crystalline syndiotactic polystyrene segments. Usually, highly syndiotactic polystyrene has a glass‐transition temperature of 100°C and behaves like a glassy polymer (possessing brittle mechanical properties) at room temperature. Thus, the graft copolymer can be used as a compatibilizer in syndiotactic polystyrene blends to modify the mechanical properties to compensate for the glassy properties of pure syndiotactic polystyrene at room temperature. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Phase separation in blends of homopolymer and graft copolymer based on styrene and butadiene

A series of blends of homopolystyrene and styrene-g-butadiene copolymer with different combinations of molecular weights of the copolymer and graft polystyrene segments have been prepared. Phase separation behaviour of the blends has been examined by electron microscopy. The results reveal a regular change of morphology of the blends with the relative molecular weights of the free and graft polystyrene chains. The observed relationships between compatibility of the homopolymer and copolymer and the relative molecular weight are generally in agreement with that observed previously in homopolymer-block copolymer blends. Taking the inherent polydispersity of the molecular weight of the component polymers into account, some peculiarities of the morphologies of the blends have been explained.     

Polymer blends of poly(trimethylene terephthalate) and polystyrene compatibilized by styrene‐glycidyl methacrylate copolymers

The compatibilizing effects of styrene‐glycidyl methacrylate (SG) copolymers with various glycidyl methyacrylate (GMA) contents on immiscible blends of poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) and polystyrene (PS) were investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and ¹³C‐solid‐state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The epoxy functional groups in the SG copolymer were able to react with the PTT end groups (? COOH or ? OH) to form SG‐g‐PTT copolymers during melt processing. These in situ–formed graft copolymers tended to reside along the interface to reduce the interfacial tension and to increase the interfacial adhesion. The compatibilized PTT/PS blend possessed a smaller phase domain, higher viscosity, and better tensile properties than did the corresponding uncompatibilized blend. For all compositions, about 5% GMA in SG copolymer was found to be the optimum content to produce the best compatibilization of the blend. This study demonstrated that SG copolymers can be used efficiently in compatibilizing polymer blends of PTT and PS. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 88: 2247–2252, 2003     

Synthesis of polypropylene graft copolymers from a hydroxyl‐groups‐containing polypropylene precursor via atom‐transfer radical polymerization

Isotactic polypropylene graft copolymers, isotactic[polypropylene‐graft‐poly(methyl methacrylate)] (i‐PP‐g‐PMMA) and isotactic[polypropylene‐graft‐polystyrene] (i‐PP‐g‐PS), were prepared by atom‐transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) using a 2‐bromopropionic ester macro‐initiator from functional polypropylene‐containing hydroxyl groups. This kind of functionalized propylene can be obtained by copolymerization of propylene and borane monomer using isospecific MgCl₂‐supported TiCl₄ as catalyst. Both the graft density and the molecular weights of i‐PP‐based graft copolymers were controlled by changing the hydroxyl group contents of functionalized polypropylene and the amount of monomer used in the grafting reaction. The effect of i‐PP‐g‐PS graft copolymer on PP‐PS blends and that of i‐PP‐g‐PMMA graft copolymer on PP‐PMMA blends were studied by scanning electron microscopy. Copyright © 2006 Society of Chemical Industry     

Novel multimonomer‐grafted polypropylene preparation and application in polypropylene/poly(vinyl chloride) blends

A novel grafted polymer was prepared in one step through free‐radical melt grafting in a single‐screw extruder. It was shown that the addition of styrene (St) to the melt‐grafting system as a comonomer could significantly enhance the grafting degree of methyl methacrylate (MMA) onto polypropylene (PP) and reduce the degradation of the PP matrix by means of Fourier transform infrared and melt flow rate testing, respectively. Then, the potential of using multimonomer‐grafted PP, which was designated PP‐g‐(St‐co‐MMA), as the compatibilizer in PP/poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) blends was also examined. In comparison with PP/PVC blends, the average size of the dispersed phase was greatly reduced in grafted polypropylene (gPP)/PVC blends because of the addition of the PP‐g‐(St‐co‐MMA) graft copolymer. The tensile strength of the gPP/PVC blends increased significantly, and the impact strength was unchanged from that of the pure PP/PVC blends. The results of differential scanning calorimetry and scanning electron microscopy suggested that the compatibility of the PP/PVC blends was improved. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Improved compatibility of high‐density polyethylene/poly(ethylene terephthalate) blend by the use of blocked isocyanate group

The blocked isocyanate group (BHI) was synthesized to improve the storage stability of HI (2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate combined with isophorone diisocyanate) and characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). High‐density polyethylene grafted with the blocked isocyanate group (HDPE‐g‐BHI) was used as a reactive compatibilizer for an immiscible high‐density polyethylene/poly(ethylene terephthalate) (HDPE/PET) blend. A possible reactive compatibilization mechanism is that regenerated isocyanate groups of HDPE functionalized by BHI react with the hydroxyl and carboxyl groups of PET during melt blending. The HDPE‐g‐BHI/PET blend showed the smaller size of a dispersed phase compared to the HDPE/PET blend, indicating improved compatibility between HDPE and PET. This increased compatibility was due to the formation of an in situ graft copolymer, which was confirmed by dynamic mechanical analysis. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis represented that there were few changes in the crystallinity for the continuous PET phase of the HDPE‐g‐BHI/PET blends, compared with those of the HDPE/PET blends at the same composition. Tensile strengths and elongations at the break of the HDPE‐g‐BHI/PET blends were greater than those of the HDPE/PET blends. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 78: 1017–1024, 2000     

Melt rheology and morphology of uncompatibilized and in situ compatibilized nylon‐6/ethylene propylene rubber blends

Melt rheology and morphology of nylon‐6/ethylene propylene rubber (EPR) blends were studied as a function of composition, temperature, and compatibilizer loading. Uncompatibilized blends with higher nylon‐6 content (N90 and N95) and rubber content (N5 and N10) had viscosities approximately intermediate between those of the component polymers. A very clear negative deviation was observed in the viscosity–composition curve over the entire shear rate range studied for blends having composition N30, N50, and N70. This was associated with the interlayer slip resulting from the high‐level incompatibility between the component polymers. The lack of compatibility was confirmed by fracture surface morphology, given that the dispersed domains showed no sign of adhesion to the matrix. The phase morphology studies indicated that EPR was dispersed as spherical inclusions in the nylon matrix up to 30 wt % of its concentration. A cocontinuous morphology was observed between 30 and 50 wt % nylon and a phase inversion beyond 70 wt % nylon. Various models based on viscosity ratios were used to predict the region of phase inversion. Experiments were also carried out on in situ compatibilization using maleic anhydride–modified EPR (EPR‐g‐MA). In this reactive compatibilization strategy, the maleic anhydride groups of modified EPR reacted with the amino end groups of nylon. This reaction produced a graft copolymer at the blend interface, which in fact acted as the compatibilizer. The viscosity of the blend was found to increase when a few percent of modified EPR was added; at higher concentrations the viscosity leveled off, indicating a high level of interaction at the interface. Morphological investigations indicated that the size of the dispersed phase initially decreased when a few percent of the graft copolymer was added followed by a clear leveling off at higher concentration. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 92: 252–264, 2004     

Polymer blends of poly(ethylene‐2,6‐naphthalate) with polystyrene compatibilized by styrene‐glycidyl methacrylate copolymers. I. Rheology,morphology, and mechanical properties

The compatibilization of blends of poly(ethylene‐2,6‐naphthalate) (PEN) with polystyrene (PS), through the styrene‐glycidyl methacrylate copolymers (SG) containing various glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) contents, was investigated in this study. SG copolymers are able to react with PEN terminal groups during melt blending, resulting in the formation of desirable SG‐g‐PEN copolymers in the blend. These in situ formed copolymers tend to reside along the interface preferentially as the result of interfacial reaction and thus function as effective compatibilizers in PEN/PS blends. The compatibilized blends exhibit higher viscosity, finer phase domain, and improved mechanical properties. It is found that the degree of grafting of the in situ formed SG‐g‐PEN copolymer has to be considered as well. In blends compatibilized with the SG copolymer containing higher GMA content, heavily grafted copolymers would be produced. The length of the styrene segment in these heavily grafted copolymers would be too short to penetrate deep enough into the PS phase to form effective entanglements, resulting in the lower compatibilization efficiency in PEN/PS blends. Consequently, the in situ formation of SG‐g‐PEN copolymers with an optimal degree of grafting is the key to achieving the best performance for the eventually produced PEN/PS blends through SG copolymers. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 87: 967–975, 2003     

Thermal properties and morphology of recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate)/maleic anhydride grafted linear low‐density polyethylene blends

Properties of recycled Poly(ethylene terephthalate) were greatly improved. Recycled PET was blended with LLDPE‐g‐MA by low‐temperature solid‐state extrusion. Mechanical properties of the blends were affected obviously by the added LLDPE‐g‐MA. Elongation at break reaches 352.8% when the blend contains 10 wt % LLDPE‐g‐MA. Crystallization behavior of PET phase was affected by LLDPE‐g‐MA content. Crystallinity of PET decreased with the increase of LLDPE‐g‐MA content. FTIR testified that maleic anhydride group in LLDPE‐g‐MA reacted with the end hydroxyl groups of PET and PET‐co‐LLDPE‐g‐MA copolymers were in situ synthesized. SEM micrographs display that LLDPE‐g‐MA phase and PET phase are incompatible and the compatibility of the blends can be improved by the forming of PET‐co‐LLDPE‐g‐MA copolymer. LLDPE‐g‐MA content was less, the LLDPE‐g‐MA phase dispersed in PET matrix fine. With the increase of LLDPE‐g‐MA content, the morphology of dispersed LLDPE‐g‐MA phase changed from spherule to cigar bar, then to irregular spherule. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Reactively formed ENPT copolymers as compatibilizers in ternary blends of poly(ethylene naphthalate)/poly(pentamethylene terephthalate)/poly(ether imide)

The compatibility of ternary blends of poly(ethylene naphthalate)/poly(pentamethylene terephthalate)/poly(ether imide) (PEN/PPT/PEI) was studied by examining the transesterification of PEN and PPT. ENPT copolymers were formed in situ as compatibilizers between PPT and PEI components in ternary blends. Differential scanning calorimetric (DSC) results for ternary blends showed the immiscibility of PEN/PPT/PEI, but ternary blends of all compositions were phase‐homogeneous after heat treatment at 300°C for more than 60 min. Annealing samples at 300°C yielded amorphous blends with a clear, single glass transition temperature (T_g), as the final state. Additionally, ENPT copolymer improved the compatibility of ENPT/PPT/PEI blends, yielding a homogeneous phase in the ENPT‐rich compositions. The morphology of the ENPT/PPT/PEI blends was altered from heterogeneous to homogeneous by controlling the concentration of PPT in the ENPT copolymers as well as the concentration of the ENPT copolymers. Moreover, a homogeneous phase with a clear T_g was observed when the concentration of PPT in the ENPT copolymer fell to 70 wt% in the ENPT/PEI = 50/50 blends. Experimental results indicate how the concentration of PPT in the ENPT copolymer affects miscibility in the ENPT/PEI blends. POLYM. ENG. SCI. 46:337–343, 2006. © 2006 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Linear viscoelastic behavior of compatibilized PMMA/PP blends

In this work, the morphology and linear viscoelastic behavior of PMMA/PP blends to which a graft copolymer PP‐g‐PMMA has been added was studied. The copolymer concentration varied from 1 to 10 wt % relative to the dispersed phase concentration. The rheological data were used to infer the interfacial tension between the blended components. It was observed that PP‐g‐PMMA was effective as a compatibilizer for PMMA/PP blends. For PP‐g‐PMMA concentration added below the critical concentration of interface saturation, two rheological behaviors were observed depending on the blend concentration: for 70/30 blend, the storage modulus, at low frequencies, increased as compared to the one of the unmodified blend; for 90/10 blend, it decreased. For 90/10 blend, the relaxation spectrum presented an interfacial relaxation time related to the presence of the compatibilizer (τ_β). For PP‐g‐PMMA concentrations added above the critical concentration of interface saturation, the storage modulus of all blends increased as compared with the one of the unmodified blend. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2013     

On the mechanism of compatibilization of polyolefin/liquid crystalline polymer blends with graft copolymers

The compatibilization mechanism of some compatibilizers for blends of polyolefins with a liquid crystalline polymer (LCP) was studied. Polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP) were blended with a semirigid LCP (SBH) in a batch mixer, either with and without compatibilizers. The latter were two commercially available samples of functionalized polyolefins, that is, a PE‐g‐MA (HDM) and a PP‐g‐AA (Polybond 1001) copolymer and some purposely synthesized PE‐g‐LCP and PP‐g‐LCP copolymers. Microtomed films of the binary and the ternary blends were annealed at 240°C on the hot stage of a polarizing microscope and the changes undergone by their morphology were recorded as a function of time. The results indicate that the compatibilizers lower the interfacial tension, thereby providing an improvement of the minor phase dispersion. In addition to this, the rate of the coalescence caused by the high‐temperature treatment is appreciably reduced in the systems compatibilized with the PE–SBH and PP–SBH graft copolymers. Among the commercial compatibilizers, only Polybond 1001 displayed an effect comparable to that of the above copolymers. HDM improved the morphology of the as‐prepared PE blends, but failed to grant sufficient morphological stabilization against annealing‐induced coarsening. The results are discussed with reference to the chemical structure of the different compatibilizers. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 77: 3027–3034, 2000     

Preparation of the HIPS/MA graft copolymer and its compatibilization in HIPS/PA1010 blends

The graft copolymer of high‐impact polystyrene (HIPS) grafted with maleic anhydride (MA) (HIPS‐g‐MA) was prepared with melt mixing in the presence of a free‐radical initiator. The grafting reaction was confirmed by infrared analyses, and the amount of MA grafted on HIPS was evaluated by a titration method. 1–5% of MA can be grafted on HIPS. HIPS‐g‐MA is miscible with HIPS. Its anhydride group can react with polyamide 1010 (PA1010) during melt mixing of the two components. The compatibility of HIPS‐g‐MA in the HIPS/PA1010 blends was evident. Evidence of reactions in the blends was confirmed in the morphology and mechanical behavior of the blends. A significant reduction in domain size was observed because of the compatibilization of HIPS‐g‐MA in the blends of HIPS and PA1010. The tensile mechanical properties of the prepared blends were investigated, and the fracture surfaces of the blends were examined by means of the scanning electron microscope. The improved adhesion in a 15% HIPS/75% PA1010 blend with 10% HIPS‐g‐MA copolymer was detected. The morphology of fibrillar ligaments formed by PA1010 connecting HIPS particles was observed. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 71: 2017–2025, 1999     

Effect of maleic anhydride grafted polybutadiene on the compatibility of polyamide 66/acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene copolymer blend

The addition of maleic anhydride grafted polybutadiene (PB‐g‐MAH) can greatly improve the compatibility of polyamide 66 (PA66)/acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene copolymer (ABS) blends. Unlike the commonly used compatibilizers in polyamide/ABS blends, PB‐g‐MAH is compatible with the ABS particles' core phase polybutadiene (PB), rather than the shell styrene‐acrylonitrile (SAN). The compatibility and interaction of the components in the blends were characterized by Fourier transform‐infrared spectra (FTIR), Molau tests, melt flow index (MFI), dynamic mechanical analyses (DMA), and scanning electron microscopic (SEM) observations. The results show that PB‐g‐MAH can react with the amino end groups in PA66 while entangle with the PB phase in ABS. In this way, the compatibilizer anchors at the interface of PA66/ABS blend. The morphology study of the fracture sections before and after tensile test reveals that the ABS particles were dispersed uniformly in the PA66 matrix and the interfacial adhesion between PA66 and ABS was increased significantly. The mechanical properties of the blends thus were enhanced with the improving of the compatibility. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2012. © 2011 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Mechanical characterization of toughened polyamide‐6 blends with metallocene copolymers

The effectiveness as impact modifier of two in situ maleated metallocene copolymers, a metallocene polyethylene, (mPE1) and a metallocene ethylene‐propylene (mEPDM) and three commercial maleated copolymers (mPE2‐g‐MA, EPDM‐g‐MA, and mEPR‐g‐MA) were studied in binary and ternary blends carried out in an intermeshing corotating twin‐screw extruder with polyamide‐6 (PA) as matrix (80 wt %). Also, the effects of the grafting degree, viscosity ratio, and crystallinity of the dispersed phases on the morphological and mechanical properties of the blends were investigated. A significant improvement of the compatibility of these grafted copolymers with PA6 was shown by FTIR spectroscopy, capillary rheometry, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in all reactive blends. The tensile strength values of the mEPR‐g‐MA/PA2 binary blend showed the highest strain hardening. The results obtained in this work indicated that the effectiveness of the grafted copolymers as impact modifier depends on the morphology of the blends and a combination of tensile properties of the blend components such as Young's modulus, Poisson ratio, and break stress. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Thermal analyses of graft copolymers of poly (methyl methacrylate) main chain with poly (propylene oxide-b-ethylene oxide) graft chain

Poly(methyl methacrylate-g-(propylene oxide-b-ethylene oxide)) and poly (methyl methacrylate-g-(ethylene oxide-b-propylene oxide)), comprising chemically dissimilar sequences, exhibit intramolecular phase separation. These compositions have applications in coatings and as surface-tension modifiers. This paper presents the thermal behavior of these graft copolymers: separate samples of the homopolymer and of the grafts were also analyzed to provide comparisons. The phase behavior has been analyzed by differential scanning calorimetry and by dynamic-mechanical thermal measurements. Two glass transitions (T_g) are observed, caused by the partial incompatibility within the copolymers. The activation energy of the T_g relaxation process of the main chain is decreased by the graft chain. The influence of poly(propylene oxide-b-ethylene oxide) grafts on the thermal degradation of the poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) main chain was studied by using thermogravimetric analysis. Prolysis of the graft copolymers occurs in three stages and begins on the graft chain and at a lower temperature than the pyrolysis of pure PMMA. Both the phase behavior and the thermal stability are found to depend sensitively on the composition of the copolymer. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.