Seroprevalence of hepatitis E virus among United Nations Mission in Haiti (UNMIH) peacekeepers, 1995

In the management of unstable angina and non-Q-wave acute myocardial infarction (AMI), there is considerable debate regarding the use of invasive strategy versus conservative strategy. The Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) III B trial found similar clinical outcomes for the 2 strategies, but the Veterans Administration Non-Q-Wave Infarction Strategies in-Hospital trial found a higher mortality with the invasive strategy. Both these trials were conducted before platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition and coronary stenting, both of which improve clinical outcome. Thus, there is a need to reexamine the question of which management strategy is optimal in the current era of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition and new coronary interventions. The Treat Angina with Aggrastat and determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy (TACTICS-TIMI 18) trial is an international, multicenter, randomized trial that is evaluating the clinical efficacy of early invasive and early conservative treatment strategies in patients with unstable angina or non-Q-wave AMI treated with tirofiban, heparin, and aspirin. Patients are randomized to an invasive strategy, involving cardiac catheterization within 4 to 48 hours and revascularization with angioplasty or bypass surgery if feasible, versus a conservative strategy, where patients are referred for catheterization only for recurrent pain at rest or provokable ischemia. The primary end point is death, MI, or rehospitalization for acute coronary syndromes through a 6-month follow-up. The trial is also testing the "troponin hypothesis," that baseline troponins T and I will be useful in selecting an optimal management strategy.     

Abciximab. An updated review of its use in ischaemic heart disease

Abciximab is a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist that has proven to be of significant clinical value in improving patient outcome after percutaneous coronary revascularisation. Primarily, the drug inhibits platelet aggregation, but it may also have anticoagulant activity and other beneficial effects, such as inhibiting migration and promoting apoptosis of smooth muscle cells. Large well designed studies have found administration of abciximab (as an adjunct to heparin and aspirin) during percutaneous coronary revascularisation to significantly reduce the incidence of ischaemic complications occurring in the 30 days after the procedure. Significant benefit, particularly on the incidence of myocardial infarction, was still evident after 6 months in 2 of 4 major trials. Abciximab provides particular benefit in patients with unstable angina or myocardial infarction who are undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularisation. The benefits of the drug are additive to those achieved with coronary stenting. Very preliminary data suggest that abciximab may improve coronary blood flow after myocardial infarction and allow reperfusion to be achieved with reduced thrombolytic doses. Caution is required to minimise the risk of bleeding complications with the use of abciximab in combination with heparin and aspirin. Careful patient selection, use of an appropriate heparin regimen, early vascular sheath removal and meticulous femoral artery access site care are recommended. Thrombocytopenia can occur with abciximab treatment, but severe cases are uncommon (< 2% of patients) and can be treated with platelet transfusions. The high acquisition cost of abciximab may be partly or fully offset by the costs averted by the reduced incidence of ischaemic complications and need for urgent and/or repeat revascularisation in high risk patients who receive the drug. However, if bleeding complications occur, this adds to treatment costs. Cost effectiveness analyses generally support the use of abciximab in high risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: Abciximab can be recommended for the prevention of acute ischaemic events in most patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularisation, but careful patient selection and strict adherence to the recommended treatment protocol are required to reduce the risk of bleeding complications and thrombocytopenia. Its use in high risk patients is largely supported by pharmacoeconomic data. Further pharmacoeconomic information is needed to establish the drug as a standard of care for all patient groups. The indications for abciximab are likely to expand as more data on its use in acute coronary syndromes become available.     

A risk-benefit assessment of abciximab in angioplasty

Advances in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have allowed procedures to be performed on a variety of patients with a spectrum of challenging coronary anatomy. Abciximab has permitted further expansion and has made the procedure safer. Abciximab is a chimerised murine monoclonal antibody directed against the platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb-IIIa receptor. Binding to this receptor inhibits platelet aggregation to a wide variety of biological agonists. It also binds to alphavbeta3 and leucocyte MAC-1 receptors; the biological significance of its affinity to these receptors is unclear. Abciximab has an extremely short plasma half-life. Since abciximab binds to the platelet GP IIb-IIIa receptor with great avidity it has an extremely long biological half-life. The use of abciximab is currently confined primarily to PCIs. The first large trial, EPIC, established that abciximab, given with aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) and heparin, reduced the frequency of peri-procedural ischaemic events by 35% in high-risk patients. For this reduction a bolus of 0.25 mg/kg was followed by a 12-hour infusion of abciximab. However, the transfusion rate was doubled. A subsequent trial, EPILOG, indicated that reduction of the dose of heparin along with expeditious removal of arterial access sheaths, reduced the rate of haemorrhagic complications to a level comparable with placebo-treated patients. while also amplifying the reduction in ischaemic events. In a third trial, EPISTENT, this benefit was shown to include patients undergoing elective coronary stent implantation. Additional trials have demonstrated that the same effect is present in patients undergoing primary PCI for acute myocardial infarction and in patients undergoing PCI for refractory unstable angina pectoris. In the latter situation, treatment with abciximab for 18 to 24 hours preceding the intervention reduced the rate of myocardial infarction even before the procedure was begun. The rationale for the use abciximab is thus clearly established. Bleeding complications can be reduced by limiting the heparin dose, avoiding unneeded venous access site punctures, and expeditious removal of arterial sheaths. In emergency coronary artery bypass surgery, platelet transfusion reduces the number of receptors occupied per platelet and is likely to reduce the degree of postoperative bleeding. The cost of abciximab remains an issue; however, this is partially offset by the reduction in ischaemic complications and accompanying resource use. In patients undergoing elective coronary stenting, abciximab use reduced the long term rate of target vessel revascularisation. The degree to which this reduction results in further cost savings will require further analysis.     

Effect of intravenous heparin infusion on thrombin-antithrombin complex and fibrinopeptide A in unstable angina

BACKGROUND: In unstable angina, the clinical efficacy of heparin is limited in time, and recurrence of adverse events has been reported after discontinuation of the anticoagulant. METHODS: In 21 episodes of unstable angina, we used the plasma level of fibrinopeptide A (FPA) and of thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT) to evaluate the pattern of thrombin inhibition by heparin and the effect of stopping heparin and initiating aspirin. RESULTS: At admission, the plasma level of FPA was increased: median value 3.7 ng/mL compared with 5.5 ng/mL in a control group of 20 patients with early myocardial infarction (not significant). The following findings were observed during a 4-day course of intravenous heparin infusion: (1) FPA decreased significantly 6 hours after the start of therapy; (2) FPA was lower when activated partial thromboplastic time (aPTT) was >1.5 times baseline; (3) there was a significant negative correlation between aPTT and FPA. Twenty-four hours after heparin was discontinued and aspirin initiated, a significant increase in TAT and FPA in plasma was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm ongoing fibrin formation in the active phase of unstable angina, indicate incomplete and variable inhibition of thrombin by heparin during continuous infusion, and suggest a risk of re-emergence of thrombosis (in spite of initiating aspirin) 24 hours after withdrawal of heparin. Data demonstrate a better control of thrombin activity when heparin is infused at rates that maintain aPTT at >1.5 times baseline, as currently recommended in unstable angina.     

Current approach in antithrombotic treatment during coronary interventions: specific thrombocyte aggregation inhibitors and direct thrombin antagonists in high-risk patients

Patients undergoing angioplasty (PTCA) for unstable angina, postinfarction angina, or complex coronary lesions represent a high risk group for ischemic complications. High dose heparin and aspirin are used routinely to prevent thrombotic complications. However, new approaches designed to avoid platelet aggregation, including development of specific platelet GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists and specific thrombin inhibitors, demonstrate a significant reduction of thrombotic events following coronary interventions compared to heparin alone. Bleeding complications are not increased if conjunctive heparin administration is weight-adjusted. Pathophysiology of acute coronary closure, mechanisms of action of the new anti-thrombotic drugs, and current and future clinical applications are discussed.     

Prospective use of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockers in the emergency department setting

Platelets play a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and thus are logical therapeutic targets for treatment of this disease process. Platelet glycoprotein (GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists, which interrupt the final common pathway of platelet aggregation, have been proven to reduce the 30-day incidence of death, acute myocardial infarction (MI), and urgent revascularization in both high-risk and low-risk patients undergoing percutaneous intervention procedures. Three-year follow-up has indicated that these benefits appear durable. Recent large-scale randomized trials have demonstrated the value of GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors in reducing the risk of death and MI in unstable angina/non-Q-wave MI patients receiving pharmacologic management. And, emerging evidence suggests a future role for GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors as an adjunct to low-dose fibrinolytic therapy in patients with acute MI. As the list of indications for GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists expands to encompass the full spectrum of ACS, there is increasing interest in the potential use of these agents in the emergency department setting. The integration of GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors into emergency department protocols will ultimately depend largely on whether these drugs prove to be safe and effective regardless of the direction of ST-segment deviation, and irrespective of whether definitive therapy will be invasive or conservative.     

Randomised comparison of subcutaneous heparin, intravenous heparin, and aspirin in unstable angina. Studio Epoorine Sottocutanea nell'Angina Instobile (SESAIR) Refrattorie Group

Intravenous heparin has been used in the control of myocardial ischaemia in patients with unstable angina. We set out to assess the efficacy of subcutaneous heparin in reducing myocardial ischaemia in patients with unstable angina. 343 of 399 patients with unstable angina were monitored for 24 h and 108 were refractory to conventional antianginal treatment and were entered into a randomised multicentre trial. 37 patients were assigned to heparin infusion (partial thromboplastin time 1.5-2 times baseline), 35 to subcutaneous heparin (adjusted dose with partial thromboplastin time 1.5-2 times baseline), and 36 to aspirin (325 mg daily). All had additional conventional antianginal therapy. After the run-in patients were monitored for 3 days. The primary endpoint was reduced myocardial ischaemia assessed by the number of anginal attacks, silent ischaemic episodes, and duration of ischaemia per day. At 1 week and 1 month we accounted for anginal attacks and other clinical events (myocardial infarction, revascularisation procedures, and death). Aspirin did not significantly affect the incidence of myocardial ischaemia. On the first 3 days, infused and subcutaneous heparin significantly decreased the frequency of angina (on average by 91% and 86%, respectively), episodes of silent ischaemia (by 56% and 46%), and the overall duration of ischaemia (66% and 61%) versus run-in day and aspirin (p < 0.001 for all variables). The favourable effects of heparin therapy remained evident during follow-up. Only minor bleeding complications occurred. Subcutaneous heparin is effective in the control of myocardial ischaemia in patients with unstable angina.     

Management of patients with unstable angina in a general cardiology unit

AIMS: To review the clinical management of patients with unstable angina and to relate prospectively initial risk stratification, according to the Braunwald criteria, to subsequent cardiovascular events. METHODS: From February to April 1996 we performed a three month prospective review of all patients with a diagnosis of unstable angina admitted to the coronary care unit at Auckland Hospital. RESULTS: One hundred and four patients (61% male), with a mean age of 64 years, were classified as high (58%), intermediate (41%) or low risk (1%) for an adverse cardiac event. Twelve (12%) patients had a documented myocardial infarction, of whom 11 were in the high-risk group (p = 0.038). During hospitalisation there was one death. Twelve (12%) patients underwent inpatient exercise testing, five of whom proceeded to a coronary angiogram prior to hospital discharge. Twenty-two (21%) unstable patients underwent inpatient angiography without prior exercise testing. Twenty-one (20%) patients required revascularisation on the same admission: percutaneous coronary angioplasty (n = 14) or coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 7). Twelve of these 21 patients were in the high-risk group (p = 0.999, NS). CONCLUSION: Patients admitted with unstable angina had low inpatient mortality but a 12% rate of subsequent myocardial infarction. Braunwald low-risk unstable angina patients were not admitted to the coronary care unit. Braunwald high-risk patients were more likely to develop a subsequent myocardial infarction. Stratification of patients into intermediate or high-risk groups did not relate to initial medical management or subsequent revascularisation. Thus, while this method of risk stratification may predict cardiovascular events, it may be of limited clinical use in the New Zealand environment.     

Angioscopic predictors of early adverse outcome after coronary angioplasty in patients with unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND: Clinical and angiographic criteria have a limited ability to predict adverse outcome in patients with unstable angina who are undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). We investigated whether the use of angioscopy can improve prediction of early adverse outcome after PTCA. METHODS AND RESULTS: Angioscopic characterization of the culprit lesion was performed before PTCA in 32 patients with unstable angina and 10 with non-Q-wave infarction. Seven patients (17%) had an adverse outcome (myocardial infarction, repeat PTCA, or need for coronary artery bypass graft surgery) within 24 hours after PTCA. Six of 18 patients with a yellow culprit lesion had an adverse outcome compared with 1 of 24 in whom the culprit lesion was white (P = .03). Six of 20 patients with plaque disruption suffered an adverse outcome compared with 1 of 22 with nondisrupted plaques (P = .04). Six of 17 patients with intraluminal thrombus had an adverse outcome, whereas only 1 of 25 patients without thrombus suffered an adverse outcome (P = .01). Yellow color, disruption, and thrombus at the culprit lesion site were associated with an eightfold increase in risk of adverse outcome after PTCA. The prediction of PTCA outcome based on characteristics of the plaque that were identifiable by angioscopy was superior to that estimated by the use of angiographic variables. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with unstable angina and non-Q-wave infarction, angioscopic features of disruption, yellow color, or thrombus at the culprit lesion site can identify patients at high risk of early adverse outcome after PTCA. Angioscopy was superior to angiography for prediction of PTCA outcome.     

Randomised trial of coronary intervention with antibody against platelet IIb/IIIa integrin for reduction of clinical restenosis: results at six months. The EPIC Investigators

Restenosis after coronary angioplasty occurs in at least 30% of patients in the first six months and, as yet, there is no known treatment to decrease this event. We tested a monoclonal antibody Fab fragment (c7E3) directed against the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa integrin, the receptor mediating the final common pathway of platelet aggregation, to see whether it reduced the frequency of clinical restenosis. Patients who had unstable angina, recent or evolving myocardial infarction, or high-risk angiographic morphology, were randomised to receive c7E3 bolus and a 12 hour infusion of c7E3 (708 patients), c7E3 bolus and placebo infusion (695 patients), or placebo bolus and placebo infusion (696 patients). With maintenance of the double-blind state, patients were followed-up for at least 6 months to determine the need for repeat angioplasty or surgical coronary revascularisation and the occurrence of ischaemic events. By 30 days, 12.8% of placebo bolus/placebo infusion patients had had a major ischaemic event (death, myocardial infarction, urgent revascularisation), compared with 8.3% of c7E3 bolus/c7E3 infusion patients, yielding a 4.5% difference (35% reduction, p = 0.008). At 6 months, the absolute difference in patients with major ischaemic event or elective revascularisation was 8.1% between placebo bolus/placebo infusion and c7E3 bolus/c7E3 infusion patients (35.1% vs 27.0%; 23% reduction p = 0.001). The favourable long-term effect was mainly due to less need for bypass surgery or repeat angioplasty in patients with an initial successful procedure, since need for repeat target vessel revascularisation was 26% less for c7E3 bolus/c7E3 infusion than for placebo treatment (16.5% vs 22.3%; p = 0.007). The c7E3 bolus/placebo infusion group had an intermediate outcome which was not significantly better than that of the placebo bolus/placebo infusion group. These results extend the benefit of c7E3 bolus/c7E3 infusion from reducing abrupt closure and acute-phase adverse outcomes to a diminished need for subsequent coronary revascularisation procedures. Because this therapy carries a risk of bleeding complications and has been studied only in high-risk angioplasty patients, further evaluation is needed before it can be applied to other patient groups.     

One-year outcomes of diabetic versus nondiabetic patients with non-Q-wave acute myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

Risk factors and outcomes associated with non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI) in diabetics and nondiabetics were analyzed for 376 consecutive patients, 77 with diabetes (20%) and 299 nondiabetics (80%), who had non-Q-wave MI and had percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) performed before discharge from hospital during the period from January 1992 to February 1996. Diabetics were slightly older (64 +/- 10 years vs 61 +/- 12 years, p <0.053), had more prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery (27% vs 12%, p <0.001), and hypertension (77% vs 49%, p <0.001). There was no significant difference in unstable angina, saphenous vein graft PTCA, single versus multiple vessel disease, or history of MI. PTCA success rates for diabetics versus nondiabetics were similar (96% vs 97%, p = NS). In-hospital complications such CABG, recurrent MI, repeat PTCA, stroke, and death were not statistically significant between the 2 groups. At 1-year follow-up, survival in diabetics (92%) was similar to nondiabetics (94%, p = NS), although event-free survival (PTCA, CABG, MI, death) was worse in diabetics (55% vs 67% for nondiabetics, p <0.05). Although diabetic patients with non-Q-wave MI represent a cohort with more risk factors for poor outcome, aggressive in-hospital revascularization with PTCA results in an excellent short-term outcome as well as 1-year survival similar to the nondiabetic patients. However, total events at 1-year follow-up are more common in the diabetic patients, suggesting that more aggressive screening and therapy in follow-up may be warranted, and that a diabetic with non-Q-wave MI will require increased utilization of cardiovascular resources in the first year after the event.     

Preoperative evaluation of coronary circulation

To define a strategy for coronary circulation assessment is a difficult task as most of the studies have been carried out in vascular surgery, as some of them are controversial, and as no test has a 100% sensitivity and specificity. However patients with high perioperative risk of cardiac events have to be identified, in order to intensify medical treatment or to consider myocardial revascularisation. A first evaluation is based on history, physical examination and simple tests, such as rest electrocardiogram and thorax X-Ray. Additional tests are not required when surgery does not elicit a major activity of the cardiocirculatory system. Postoperative cardiac risk is low when none of the nine risk factors defined by Goldman and/or coronary insufficiency (residual angina elicited by minor physical activity, unstable angina, myocardial infarction) are present. The problem remains in patients with Goldman risk factors and/or at risk of coronary artery disease because of diabetes mellitus, heavy smoking, hypercholesterolaemia, arterial hypertension, undergoing major abdominal, thoracic or vascular surgery. Preoperative electrocardiographic Holter monitoring is still of value, especially in patients with known or supposed ischaemic heart disease and unable to make a physical effort. A poor exercise capacity and changes in electrocardiographic stress testing are factors of poor prognosis. The dobutamine stress echocardiography has a good sensitivity and specificity when an effort test cannot be performed. The value of dipyridamole-thallium 201 scintigraphy could be improved by a quantitative analysis of the number of affected segments and territories. Patients with angina or ischaemic episodes on continuous electrocardiogram, or with dobutamine echocardiography kinetic disturbances and with stress myocardic scintigraphy or stress exercise testing abnormalities could undergo a coronarography, in order to consider myocardic revascularization prior to surgery.     

Bleeding complications with new antithrombotics used in ischaemic heart disease

Despite adjunctive therapy with heparin and aspirin, patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) continue to be at risk of abrupt vessel closure and acute ischaemic events. In an attempt to overcome the limitations of traditional antithrombotics, more potent agents have been developed, including direct thrombin inhibitors (e.g., hirudin and hirulog) and new antiplatelet agents [e.g., the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor c7E3 Fab (ReoProTM)]. Initial phase-III trials of hirudin in patients with acute coronary syndromes identified an excess incidence of major bleeding complications. Some of these trials have been recommenced using lower doses. Reports on phase-III trials of hirulog should be forthcoming soon. Of the new agents, the chimeric monoclonal antibody fragment c7E3 Fab has the most extensive available data. In the phase-III evaluation of 7E3 for the Prevention of Ischemic Complications trial, the administration of a c7E3 Fab bolus plus c7E3 Fab infusion reduced the rate of major ischaemic events by 35% at 30 days (p = 0.008) in patients undergoing high-risk PTCA. Major bleeding episodes occurred more frequently with this regimen than with placebo, although rates of intracranial haemorrhage or surgery for bleeding did not differ between groups. The findings suggest that the risk of bleeding complications might be reduced, without compromising efficacy, by administering heparin on a weight-adjusted basis in patients treated with c7E3 Fab.     

Incidence and characteristics of fall-related emergency department visits

BACKGROUND: Patients with acute ischemic syndromes (AIS) suffer high rates of recurrent ischemic events despite aspirin treatment. Long-term therapy with oral anticoagulants in addition to aspirin may reduce this risk. We studied the effects of long-term warfarin at 2 intensities in patients with AIS without ST elevation in 2 consecutive randomized controlled studies. METHODS AND RESULTS: In phase 1, after the cessation of 3 days of intravenous antithrombotic therapy, 309 patients were randomized to receive fixed low-dose (3 mg/d) warfarin for 6 months that produced a mean international normalized ratio (INR) of 1.5+/-0.6 or to standard therapy. Eighty-seven percent of patients received aspirin in both groups. The rates of cardiovascular (CV) death, new myocardial infarction (MI), and refractory angina at 6 months were 6.5% in the warfarin group and 3.9% in the standard therapy group (relative risk [RR], 1. 66; 95% CI, 0.62 to 4.44; P=0.31). The rates of death, new MI, and stroke were 6.5% in the warfarin group and 2.6% in the standard therapy group (RR, 2.48; 95% CI, 0.80 to 7.75; P=0.10). The overall rate of rehospitalization for unstable angina was 21% and did not differ significantly between the groups. Four patients in the warfarin group (2.6%) and none in the control group experienced a major bleed (RR, 2.48; 95% CI, 0.80 to 7.75), and there was a significant excess of minor bleeds in the warfarin group (14.2% versus 2.6%; RR, 5.46; 95% CI, 1.93 to 15.5; P=0.001). In phase 2, the protocol was modified, and 197 patients were randomized <48 hours from the onset of symptoms to receive warfarin at an adjusted dose that produced a mean INR of 2.3+/-0.6 or standard therapy for 3 months. Eighty-five percent received aspirin in both groups. The rates of CV death, new MI, and refractory angina at 3 months were 5. 1% in the warfarin group and 12.1% in the standard group (RR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.15 to 1.15; P=0.08). The rates of all death, new MI, and stroke were 5.1% in the warfarin group and 13.1% in the standard therapy group (RR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.14 to 1.05; P=0.05). Significantly fewer patients were rehospitalized for unstable angina in the warfarin group than in the control group (7.1% and 17.2%, respectively; RR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.96; P=0.03). Two patients in the warfarin group and 1 in the control group experienced a major bleed, and there was a significant excess of minor bleeds in the warfarin group (28.6% versus 12.1%; RR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.37 to 4.36; P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term treatment with moderate-intensity warfarin (INR, 2.0 to 2.5) plus aspirin but not low-intensity warfarin (INR, 1.5) plus aspirin appears to reduce the rate of recurrent ischemic events in patients with AIS without ST elevation.     

Improved risk stratification in unstable angina: identification of patients at low risk for in-hospital cardiac events by admission echocardiography

BACKGROUND: Current protocols for risk stratification of patients with acute chest pain syndromes rely on clinical parameters and are oriented toward identification of patients at high risk for adverse cardiac events; however, this paradigm for risk stratification does not adequately address the observation that adverse cardiac events are relatively uncommon in this population. In an era of cost containment, consideration also should be given to identification of patients at low risk for adverse cardiac events, who may be safely discharged without expensive inpatient hospitalization. HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to develop echocardiographic predictors that identify unstable angina patients at low risk for adverse cardiac events and that discriminate between low- and high-risk patients. METHODS: The predictive accuracy of retrospectively determined echocardiographic predictors were compared in a population-based sample of 66 consecutive unstable angina patients undergoing echocardiography within 24 h of admission. RESULTS: Echocardiographic predictors of adverse events included wall motion score index > or = 0.2, ejection fraction < or = 40%, and mitral regurgitation severity > 2. One or more echocardiographic predictors of adverse events were present in 32 patients (48%). A composite echocardiographic predictor of adverse events was specific, had a high positive predictive value for the identification of high-risk patients, and discriminated between unstable angina patients at high and low risk for adverse cardiac events. CONCLUSION: Echocardiographic predictors of adverse events are specific and discriminate between unstable angina patients at high and low risk for adverse cardiac events.     

Current aspects of thrombolytic therapy in unstable angina pectoris

In the last years, several studies addressed the role of the different antithrombotic therapeutics in unstable angina pectoris. Acetylsalicylic acid still is the standard treatment reducing the rate of death and myocardial infarction by 50% in the first six months. Ticlopidin has no clinical effect in the first six days and therefore is not suited for treatment in the acute phase. Unfractionated heparin has an additional favourable effect when added to aspirin. Low molecular weight-heparin is at least as effective as UF-heparin. Direct thrombin-inhibitors (hirudin, hirudin-analoga) seem to be comparable to UF-heparin. Plasminogen-activators should not be given in unstable angina, as they show a tendency to worsen the clinical outcome. GP IIb/IIIa-antagonists (antibodies, synthetic antagonists) significantly improve the clinical effects of aspirin. When combined with a reduced dose of heparin, their favourable effect remains unchanged, while bleeding complications are reduced to a minimum.     

Variations between countries in invasive cardiac procedures and outcomes in patients with suspected unstable angina or myocardial infarction without initial ST elevation. OASIS (Organisation to Assess Strategies for Ischaemic Syndromes) Registry Investigators

BACKGROUND: There are wide variations between countries in the use of invasive cardiac catheterisation and revascularisation procedures for patients with acute ischaemic syndromes. We studied the relation between rates of such procedures and rates of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, refractory angina, and major bleeding in a prospective, registry-based study in six countries with widely varying intervention rates. METHODS: 7987 consecutive patients presenting with unstable angina or suspected myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation were recruited prospectively from 95 hospitals in six countries and followed up for 6 months. FINDINGS: The rates of all procedures were highest in patients in Brazil and the USA, intermediate in Canada and Australia, and lowest in Hungary and Poland. There were no significant differences in rates of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction among these countries (4.7% overall [range 3.7-5.6] at 7 days; 11% overall [9-12] at 6 months). For the countries with the highest rates of invasive procedures (59%) versus the rest (21%) there was no difference in rate of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction (adjusted odds ratio 0.88 at 7 days and 1.0 at 6 months). Rates of stroke were higher in Brazil and the USA than in the countries with lower intervention rates (adjusted odds ratio at 7 days 3.0, p=0.012; at 6 months 1.8, p=0.004) but rates of refractory angina at 7 days (0.7, p<0.001) and readmission for unstable angina at 6 months were lower (0.70, 0.63; both p<0.001). Comparison of results for hospitals without cardiac-catheterisation facilities and for those with such facilities gave adjusted odds ratios for cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke at 6 months of 0.83 (10.6% vs 12.5%, p=0.05) and for refractory angina of 1.25 (19.3% vs 16.1%, p=0.09). INTERPRETATION: Higher rates of invasive and revascularisation procedures were associated with lower rates of refractory angina or readmission for unstable angina, no apparent reduction in cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction, but with higher rates of stroke. Randomised trials should assess the relative impact of conservative and more aggressive approaches to invasive cardiac procedures and revascularisations in patients with unstable angina.     

Cardiology. II. Coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction

Within the last 30 years pharmacotherapy has significantly contributed to an improvement of the prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease. With regard to antianginal drugs beta-blocker therapy has in particular enabled a risk reduction in patients with unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction and following acute myocardial infarction. Antithrombotic therapy has largely been influenced by platelet inhibitors. Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) has convincingly shown to enable a risk reduction in patients with stable angina, unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction and in the secondary prevention following myocardial infarction. The introduction of thienopyridines has led to a further improvement of antiplatelet therapy. Thus, the combination of ticlopidine + ASA was combined with a significant risk reduction of subacute stent thrombosis and has enabled stent implantation to become a breakthrough technology. Clopidogrel, another thienopyridine has been shown to be superior in comparison to a monotherapy with ASA in patients with atherothrombotic diseases. The introduction of glycoproteine-IIb-IIIa-receptor antagonists has led to a significant risk reduction of periinterventional complications in patients with unstable angina. The combination of heparin + ASA was clearly superior to a monotherapy with ASA in patients with unstable angina. Recently, a further improvement of prognosis with low molecular weight heparin has been reported. Due to somewhat conflicting results, the definite role of direct thrombin inhibitors like hirudin still has to be defined. A possible risk reduction in patients with unstable coronary syndromes has been reported. Reperfusion therapy with fibrinolytic agents has revolutionised the therapy of patients with acute myocardial infarction throughout the last decades. In numerous trials successful fibrinolysis has convincingly shown to improve the prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction and thus is still considered to be the gold standard of treatment in acute myocardial infarction.     

Modeling the electrophoresis of lysozyme. II. Inclusion of ion relaxation

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the prognostic value of the admission electrocardiogram (ECG) in patients with unstable angina and non-Q wave myocardial infarction (MI). BACKGROUND: Although the ECG is the most widely used test for evaluating patients with unstable angina and non-Q wave MI, little prospective information is available on its value in predicting outcome in the current era of aggressive medical and interventional therapy. METHODS: ECGs with the qualifying episode of pain were analyzed in patients enrolled in the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Ischemia (TIMI) III Registry, a prospective study of patients admitted to the hospital with unstable angina or non-Q wave MI. RESULTS: New ST segment deviation > or = 1 mm was present in 14.3% of 1,416 enrolled patients, isolated T wave inversion in 21.9% and left bundle branch block (LBBB) in 9.0%. By 1-year follow-up, death or MI occurred in 11% of patients with > or = 1 mm ST segment deviation compared with 6.8% of patients with new, isolated T wave inversion and 8.2% of those with no ECG changes (p < 0.001 when comparing ST with no ST segment deviation). Two other high risk groups were identified: those with only 0.5-mm ST segment deviation and those with LBBB, whose rates of death or MI by 1 year were 16.3% and 22.9%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, ST segment deviation of either > or = 1 mm or > or = 0.5 mm remained independent predictors of death or MI by 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: The admission ECG is very useful in risk stratifying patients with non-Q wave MI. The new criteria of not only > or = 1-mm ST segment deviation but also > or = 0.5-mm ST segment deviation or LBBB identify high risk patients, whereas T wave inversion does not add to the clinical history in predicting outcome.     

Prognostic influence of increased fibrinogen and C-reactive protein levels in unstable coronary artery disease. FRISC Study Group. Fragmin during Instability in Coronary Artery Disease

BACKGROUND: The prognostic influences of fibrinogen and C-reactive protein levels and their relations to myocardial damage in unstable coronary artery syndromes have not been well described. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fibrinogen and C-reactive protein were determined at inclusion and related to outcome after 5 months in 965 patients with unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction randomized to 5 weeks with low-molecular-weight heparin or placebo. The probabilities of death were 1.6%, 4.6%, and 6.9% (P=.005) and the probabilities of death and/or myocardial infarction were 9.3%, 14.2%, and 19.1% (P=.002), respectively, in patients stratified by tertiles of fibrinogen (< 3.38, 3.38 to 3.99, and > or = 4.0 g/L). The probabilities of death were 2.2%, 3.6%, and 7.5% (P=.003) after stratification of patient data by tertiles of C-reactive protein level (< 2, 2 to 10, and > 10 mg/L). In logistic multiple regression analysis, increased fibrinogen levels were independently associated with the incidence of death and/or myocardial infarction (P=.013), and elevated C-reactive protein level was associated with the incidence of death (P=.012). The increased relative risk of subsequent death or myocardial infarction in individuals with an elevated fibrinogen level was consistent in most subgroups evaluated; although significantly so only in patients with signs of myocardial damage. CONCLUSIONS: Increased levels of both fibrinogen and C-reactive protein are associated with a worse outcome in patients with unstable coronary artery disease. The increased risk associated with elevated fibrinogen levels is independent of, and additive to, the prognostic influence of myocardial damage.