Evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of a low-dose combination of isradipine and spirapril in the first-line treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension

To investigate the concept of initiating therapy with low doses of a calcium antagonist and an ACE inhibitor, a fixed combination of isradipine 2.5 mg plus the ACE inhibitor spirapril 3 mg was compared with its components, with the full-dose monotherapies (isradipine 5 mg or spirapril 6 mg), and with placebo. After a 2-week wash out phase in pretreated patients and a subsequent 2-week placebo period, 405 patients with a diastolic blood pressure (DBP) between 100 and 114 mmHg were randomly allocated to 12-week once-daily double-blind treatment in one of the six treatment arms. In patients whose blood pressure was not normalized (defined as DBP< or =90 mmHg) after 6 weeks of treatment, the dosage of either medication was doubled or, in the placebo group, was switched to the fixed combination. After week 6, the mean reductions from baseline in sitting systolic/diastolic blood pressure 24 hours after dosing (trough) for the fixed combination or the monotherapies isradipine 5 mg, isradipine 2.5 mg, spirapril 6 mg, spirapril 3 mg, and placebo were 10.4/8.7, 10.0/9.4, 6.5/6.7, 10.0/8.3, 7.0/5.8, and 2.2/4.7 mmHg, respectively. The blood pressure changes obtained with the low-dose fixed combination were essentially identical to those observed with the full-dose monotherapies, thus showing an additive effect of low-dose isradipine and spirapril. In terms of tolerability, the lowest rate of any adverse events was found in the combination group. In this group, typical adverse events of calcium antagonists, such as headache, flushing, ankle edema, or palpitations, were observed only in 5%, 2%, 1%, and 0%, respectively, dry cough, considered typical for ACE inhibitors, was observed in only 1% of the combination group. In conclusion, the low-dose components isradipine 2.5 mg and spirapril 3 mg were shown to have an additive effect when combined, exerting a blood pressure-lowering effect comparable with the full doses and a trend to a better tolerability profile in comparison with the standard doses. Thus, low-dose combination therapy with these drugs appears to be a rational alternative to conventional monotherapy in the first-line treatment of hypertension.     

厄贝沙坦氢氯噻嗪复方制剂治疗原发性高血压有效性及安全性的Meta分析

目的:利用Meta分析方法探讨厄贝沙坦氢氯噻嗪复方制剂治疗原发性高血压的有效性及安全性,为其临床应用提供依据.方法:计算机检索Cochrane图书馆临床对照试验资料库(2010年第03期)、Ovid-medline全文数据库(1966-2010.09)、PubMed数据库(1948-2010.09)、EMBASE数据库(1966-2010.09)、中国学术文献总库(CNKI)(1979-2010.09)、万方数字化期刊库(1981-2010.09)及维普数据库(VIP) (1989-2010.09),手工检索相关文献,按纳入与排除标准选择试验、评价质量,提取资料,并用RevMan 4.2软件对数据进行Meta分析.结果:共初检出516篇文献,经筛选最终纳入5篇6项关于厄贝沙坦氢氯噻嗪治疗原发性高血压的随机双盲对照研究.有效性:χ2=7.50,df=5,P=0.19,Z=7.23(P<0.00001),合并OR=2.26,95%CI [1.81,2.82];安全性:χ2=7.82,df=5,P=0.17,Z=1.11(P=0.27),合并OR=0.87,95%CI [0.68,1.11].结论:厄贝沙坦氢氯噻嗪复方制剂治疗原发性高血压与对照组比较具有较高的有效性及相似的安全性.     

ACE (I/D) genotype as a predictor of the magnitude and duration of the response to an ACE inhibitor drug (enalaprilat) in humans

BACKGROUND: We have investigated the possible effects of contrasting ACE (I/D) genotypes on the responses to the ACE inhibitor enalaprilat in normotensive men. METHODS AND RESULTS: Subjects with DD (n=12) and II (n=11) ACE genotypes received an intravenous infusion of enalaprilat or placebo. Pressor responses to stepwise, incremental doses of angiotensin I were measured at 1 and 10 hours after dosing. The dose required to raise mean blood pressure by 20 mm Hg (PD20) was calculated individually, and the ratio of PD20 during enalaprilat to that during placebo (dose ratio, DR) was used for assessment of the extent of ACE inhibition. The pressor response was significantly attenuated at 1 hour after enalaprilat in both groups, but significant attenuation was evident at 10 hours after dose only in the II subjects. The DRs at both 1 hour (median, 5.43 versus 2.82, P=0.0035) and 10 hours (2.06 versus 0.84, P=0.0008) after enalaprilat were significantly higher in II subjects than in DD subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of enalaprilat was significantly greater and lasted longer in normotensive men homozygous for the II ACE genotype. By multivariate analysis, ACE (I/D) genotype and plasma angiotensin II levels were predictive of >50% of the variation in response to ACE inhibition.     

Comparison of the safety and efficacy of a combination analgesic Myprodol and Ponstan in the treatment of dental pain

A comparison of the efficacy of Myprodol, a combination analgesic (Ibuprofen, Paracetamol and Codeine phosphate) and Ponstan (Mefenamic acid) was undertaken in a randomised double blind trial of 52 patients who underwent surgical removal of impacted or unerupted teeth. Pain scores were measured for patients pre- and post operatively by means of a visual analogue scale and data was analysed using the BMPD package on the ISM main frame computer at the Medical Research Council. The results indicated that although Myprodol and Ponstan were equally adequate and well tolerated in the control of post operative dental pain, Myprodol exceeded Ponstan in duration of analgesia and in the degree of pain intensity control experienced by the patient.     

Combination of enalapril and low-dose thiazide reduces normoalbuminuria in essential hypertension

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of the combination of enalapril with a very low dose of hydrochlorothiazide versus atenolol on urinary albumin excretion in normoalbuminuric patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. A secondary objective was to compare the effects of the two regimens in patients with different levels of albuminuria. DESIGN: A 12 weeks, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, comparative study with two parallel groups. SETTING: General practices in Denmark and Finland. PATIENTS: The subjects comprised 174 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension, normal serum creatinine and no proteinuria. INTERVENTIONS: Enalapril/hydrochlorothiazide (20/6 mg) daily or atenolol (50 mg) daily. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Urinary albumin: creatinine ratio and blood pressure. RESULTS: At baseline, normoalbuminuria was found in 74 and 85 patients in the enalapril/hydrochlorothiazide and atenolol groups, respectively. Blood pressure was reduced similarly by both treatments. The ratio of urinary albumin to creatinine in normoalbuminuric patients was significantly reduced during treatment with enalapril/hydrochlorothiazide at 20/6 mg (from geometic mean x/divided by antilog SD of 0.53 x/divided by 1.77 to 0.47 x/divided by 1.58 mg/mmol, P=0.02) but was unchanged during atenolol treatment (0.55 x/divided by 1.74 and 0.58 x/divided by 1.87 mg/mmol). The difference between the two treatments was statistically significant (P=0.03) and was predominantly achieved through a reduction of albuminuria in the upper-normal range during enalapril/hydrochlorothiazide treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Therapy with enalapril/hydrochlorothiazide at 20/6 mg and atenolol at 50 mg once daily reduced blood pressure similarly in patients with essential hypertension. Suppression of urinary albumin excretion within the normoalbuminuric range was observed during treatment with enalapril/hydrochlorothiazide at 20/6 mg.     

Efficacy of low-dose combination of bisoprolol/hydrochlorothiazide compared with amlodipine and enalapril in men and women with essential hypertension

The efficacy of the low-dose combination of bisoprolol/hydrochlorothiazide was compared with amlodipine and enalapril. The low-dose combination was found to be at least as effective as amlodipine and more effective than enalapril in both men and women.     

Fibrin-film stenting in a porcine coronary injury model: efficacy and safety compared with uncoated stents

Pyogenic liver abscess is an uncommon complication of intra-abdominal or biliary tract infection and is usually a polymicrobial infection associated with high mortality and high rates of relapse. However, over the past 15 years, we have observed a new clinical syndrome in Taiwan: liver abscesses caused by a single microorganism, Klebsiella pneumoniae. We reviewed 182 cases of pyogenic liver abscess during the period September 1990 to June 1996; 160 of these cases were caused by K. pneumoniae alone, and 22 were polymicrobial. When patients with K. pneumoniae liver abscess were compared with those who had polymicrobial liver abscess, we found higher incidences of diabetes or glucose intolerance (75% vs. 4.5%) and metastatic infections (11.9% vs. 0) and lower rates of intra-abdominal abnormalities (0.6% vs. 95.5%), mortality (11.3% vs. 41%), and relapse (4.4% vs. 41%) in the former group. Liver abscess caused by K. pneumoniae is a new clinical syndrome that has emerged as an important infectious complication in diabetic patients in Taiwan.     

Multicentre comparative study of the efficacy and safety of azithromycin compared with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in the treatment of paediatric patients with otitis media

An open multicentre study was conducted in 484 children between the ages of 6 months and 12 years with otitis media to compare the efficacy, the safety and the tolerance of once-daily azithromycin given for three days versus thrice-daily amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (CA) given for ten days. A satisfactory response (cure plus improvement) was noted 10 to 14 days after the start of treatment in 199 of 215 (92.6%) azithromycin-treated children and in 186 of 198 (93.9%) amoxicillin/CA-treated children. The relationship between treatment and clinical response was independent of chronicity of infection and the presence or absence of a perforated eardrum. Improvement in signs and symptoms of otitis media occurred significantly more rapidly in the children treated with azithromycin. Treatment-related or possibly treatment-related adverse events were recorded in 11 of 243 (4.5%) azithromycin-treated patients and in 20 of 240 (8.3%) treated with amoxicillin/CA. No patients in the azithromycin treatment group were withdrawn from treatment, but six amoxicillin/CA patients, including two < 2 years of age, discontinued treatment prematurely because of adverse events; the difference between treatment groups was statistically significant (p = 0.0146). It is concluded that azithromycin given as an oral suspension once daily for three days is as safe and effective as amoxicillin/CA given thrice daily for ten days in the treatment of children with otitis media.     

Ramipril and felodipine: a comparison of the efficacy and safety of monotherapy versus combination therapy

A multinational, double-blind, randomised study was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of a low-dose combination of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, and the calcium antagonist, felodipine ER, in 642 patients with mild to moderate hypertension [supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) = 95-115 mm Hg]. After a 4-week single-blind placebo run-in, patients were randomly allocated to once-daily felodipine extended release (ER; 2.5 mg), ramipril (2.5 mg) or felodipine ER/ramipril (2.5/2.5 mg) for 12 weeks. In the intention-to-treat analysis, mean DBP decreased significantly (p < 0.0001) after felodipine ER, ramipril and the combination (-9.1, -9.8 and -11.4 mm Hg, respectively). The decrease was significantly greater with the combination than with felodipine ER monotherapy (p = 0.02). The number of responding patients (final DBP < or = 90 mm Hg or a decrease of > or = 10 mm Hg) was also higher with the combination than with felodipine ER or ramipril monotherapy (65.1%, 53.1%, 55.7%, respectively). There were no differences between the three groups with respect to the incidence of adverse events overall or those considered treatment-related. There were fewer cases of peripheral oedema with combination therapy than with felodipine ER monotherapy. Thirty-three patients (5.1%) withdrew from the study because of adverse events, but there was no clear pattern with regard to the specific events leading to withdrawal. There were no clinically relevant changes in laboratory or clinical safety variables. Ramipril/felodipine ER 2.5/2.5 mg is an appropriate starting dosage when initiating combination antihypertensive therapy.     

Main objectives and new aspects of combination treatment of hypertension

AIM: To review the various pharmacological approaches currently proposed for the treatment of hypertension. RESULTS: With the evolution of pharmacological treatment of hypertension, various classes of agent (diuretics, beta-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, calcium antagonists and alpha 1-blockers) have become available for the initiation of antihypertensive therapy. As monotherapy, each type of agent will normalize blood pressure in about half of all hypertensive patients. Replacing one drug with another that acts through a different mechanism improves the probability of controlling blood pressure. Another way to increase the number of responders is to increase the dose; however, this often results in more side effects. A preferable way of improving efficacy is to combine low doses of drugs that have different impacts on the cardiovascular system, thus opposing the compensatory responses that tend to limit the blood pressure drop. CONCLUSION: Low-dose drug combinations are generally well tolerated and the treatment of hypertension can be simplified by using fixed-dose combinations. These combinations have the potential to become a valuable alternative in the initiation of antihypertensive therapy.     

Cyclical etidronate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: efficacy and safety after seven years of treatment

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of cyclical etidronate for up to 7 years in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis and to examine the effects of discontinuing treatment after 2 or 5 years of therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized at entry into the original study in 1986 to blinded treatment for 2 years with either a calcium (placebo) or an intermittent cyclical etidronate regimen, which most patients continued for a third year. Following this phase of the study, patients were enrolled into an open-label, follow-up study (years 4 and 5), during which all patients received cyclical etidronate treatment. In the present double-blind study (years 6 and 7), patients were rerandomized to receive intermittent cyclical therapy with either etidronate or placebo; all patients received calcium. The treatment regimen consisted of 400 mg/day etidronate or placebo for 14 days, followed by 76 days of elemental calcium (500 mg/day); this cycle was repeated approximately 4 times in each year. Of the 193 patients who continued in years 6 and 7 of the study, 93 were randomized to receive cyclical etidronate and 100 were randomized to receive calcium only. For purposes of efficacy analyses, patients were categorized by their total years of cumulative etidronate treatment (7, 5, 4, or 2 years). There were 51, 46, 42, and 54 patients in the 7-, 5-, 4-, and 2-year groups, respectively. Annual assessments included lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD), as measured by densitometry, and vertebral radiographs. RESULTS: The groups receiving cyclical etidronate during this 2-year study period (7- and 4-year groups) had statistically significant mean percent increases in spinal BMD of 1.8% and 2.2%, respectively (P < 0.05) at the week 104 observation time. The 5- and 2-year groups, which did not receive etidronate during this period, had mean values of 1.4% and 0.2%, respectively (not significant) at week 104. In the 7-, 5-, 4-, and 2-year groups, the increases in spinal BMD at the end of 7 years were 7.6%, 8.6%, 8.1%, and 3.9%, respectively; these values were statistically significant for all groups compared with original baseline (year 0) (P < 0.05). BMD of the femur and wrist was maintained throughout the 7-year period. The incidence and rate of vertebral fractures were lowest in patients with the longest exposure to etidronate. Etidronate was well tolerated during the study, with low incidences of gastrointestinal side effects and nonvertebral fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term cyclical etidronate is a safe, effective, and well-tolerated treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Bone mass is maintained for at least 2 years after treatment with etidronate is stopped; however, further gains in spinal bone mass are seen in patients who continue therapy.     

Mitogenic short-term effects on hepatocytes and adrenocortical cells: phenobarbital and reserpine compared to carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic fluorene derivatives

The adrenal cortex has a low physiologic cell renewal and shows only a moderate cell replication even after contralateral adrenalectomy. Although rather unsusceptible to the malignancy-inducing action of carcinogens, a single oral dose of various tumorigenic xenobiotics induced an additive mitotic response of adrenocortical cells studied after 48 h. Presently we report on three different response patterns in rats. First, a selective mitostimulation of the zona glomerulosa occured after reserpine associated with a loss of body weight, thymus and liver weight. These are unspecific stress effects and occur also after exogenous ACTH. Second, hepatomitogenic and liver-enlarging congeners, e.g. fluorene (FEN), fluorenone (FON) and 4-benzoyl-FON, but also the genotoxic 2-acetylaminofluorene (2-AAF) and 2,4,7-trinitro-FON induced a selective mitotic response of the zona fasciculata (ZF). After the lowest effective dose of FEN or FON the afore-mentioned effects occured simultaneously, but were absent in the high dose group (only studied with fluorene). The 2-benzyl and 2-benzoyl-substituted derivatives were ineffective at all. Third, a bizonal response was found only after phenobarbital (PB) or the lowest effective FEN dose. The preventive action of a low PB dose on the 2-AAF-induced ZF response indicates a modified metabolism. We conclude that the rapid mitotic ZF response is an endogenously mediated net effect of interactions between metabolic and various adaptive mechanisms. The latter are reported to be activated in a stressor-dependent manner and converge in the adrenals. In this way the early mitotic ZF response could reflect indirectly 'specific' proliferation-prone properties of xenobiotics.     

A randomised crossover comparison of reserpine and sustained-release nifedipine in hypertension

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of the combination of hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) plus sustained-release nifedipine with the combination of HCT plus reserpine in lowering high blood pressure (BP) unresponsive to HCT monotherapy. DESIGN: An open, randomised crossover drug trial. SETTING: Outpatients' clinic in Parirenyatwa Hospital, Harare, a tertiary referral centre. SUBJECTS: 32 Black patients of both sexes with newly diagnosed or previously treated hypertension aged between 21 and 65 years who had a BP > 140/95 after receiving HCT 25 mg daily for four weeks were studied. INTERVENTION: Patients were kept on HCT 25 mg daily and were randomised to receive either reserpine 0.25 mg daily or nifedipine (Adalat Retard) 20 mg bd for four weeks. This was followed by a two week washout period during which patients received HCT 25 mg daily only. After the washout period patients were crossed over to the alternative treatment for four weeks. Patients were kept on HCT 25 mg daily throughout the trial. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure was the fall in BP which was taken as the difference between the BP at baseline and the BP at the end of each treatment period. Both systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) measurements were taken. RESULTS: Both second line drugs were effective in lowering SBP and DBP and there was no significant difference between them. Nifedipine reduced SBP by 18.9 mmHg (95% CI 12.1 to 25.7) and DBP by 9.6 mmHg (95% CI 7.2 to 12.0). Reserpine reduced SBP by 15.9 mmHg (95% CI 8.4 to 23.4) and DBP by 11.1 mmHg (95% CI 7.5 to 14.6). However, only two patients attained the target DBP of < or = 90 mmHg after each active treatment period. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Since both agents were equally effective in reducing both SBP and DBP and reserpine is much cheaper than nifedipine, it is recommended that for a developing country like Zimbabwe, the combination of HCT and reserpine at the above doses should be used as the first step to treat mild to moderate hypertension without evidence of end organ damage. However, further trials should compare BP lowering effects as well as end organ protection offered by the trial drugs.     

A randomized, controlled trial to study the efficacy and safety of C1 inhibitor concentrate in treating hereditary angioedema

BACKGROUND: No effective treatment exists in the United States for acute attacks of hereditary angioedema (HAE). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of C1 inhibitor concentrate in treating HAE, a large primary care and referral center hospital conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial with intent-to-treat analysis. Of the 36 patients enrolled in the study, 23 received treatment, and 22 completed the trial. C1 inhibitor concentrate or albumin (placebo) infusions were administered in a blind fashion to HAE patients who came to the hospital for treatment no later than 5 hours after an attack began. RESULTS: Relief was almost twice as fast in persons receiving C1 inhibitor concentrate than in the controls: 7.62 hours (mean; SD 7.08) versus 15.35 hours (mean; SD 8.31), respectively. The difference for time-to-relief was highly significant (p = 0.007, Mann-Whitney U test). The median time-to-relief was 6.17 hours (interquartile range 0.33-15.35) in the treatment group and 15.35 hours (interquartile range 14.00-22.83) in the control group. Resolution of symptoms was one-third faster in the C1 inhibitor concentrate group than in the placebo group: 23.98 hours (mean; SD 14.81) and 34.58 hours (mean; SD 13.56), respectively (p = 0.09, Mann-Whitney U test). Recovery of functional C1 inhibitor was 119.65 percent (mean; SD 50.80), and half-life was 37.87 hours (mean; SD 19.75). Recovery of antigenic C1 inhibitor was 147.75 percent (mean; SD 97.68), and half-life was 24.01 hours (mean; SD 9.70). There were no viral infections or serious adverse effects from the drug after 70 attacks in the treatment group and 96 attacks in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: C1 inhibitor concentrate is a safe, effective treatment for acute attacks of HAE.     

Efficacy and safety of azelaic acid and glycolic acid combination therapy compared with tretinoin therapy for acne

We conducted a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, parallel-group study of the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of azelaic acid 20% cream and glycolic acid lotion compared with tretinoin 0.025% cream and a vehicle lotion to treat mild-to-moderate facial acne vulgaris. Patients treated with azelaic/glycolic acid experienced a significantly greater reduction in the number of papules, as well as a greater reduction in the number of inflammatory lesions, than those treated with tretinoin. Overall global improvement was approximately 25% in both groups. In the physician evaluations, treatment with azelaic/glycolic acid was found to cause significantly less dryness, scaling, and erythema than tretinoin. Patients also reported significantly less dryness, redness, and peeling with azelaic/glycolic acid. Significantly more patients in the azelaic/glycolic acid group than the tretinoin group reported that they felt attractive. The combination of azelaic acid and glycolic acid is a useful alternative to tretinoin, being at least as efficacious as the latter, while offering a superior tolerability and patient approval profile.     

Bradykinin suppresses alcohol intake and plays a role in the suppression produced by an ACE inhibitor

The possible role of the endogenous kinins in the control of alcohol intake was assessed in two experiments. In Experiment 1, naive rats, maintained on ad lib food and water, were given daily 40-min access to a 6% (w/v) alcohol solution and water. Daily intraperitoneal (IP) injections of captopril (20 mg/kg) significantly reduced alcohol intake, while pretreatment with subcutaneous (SC) injections of the bradykinin antagonist [D-Phe7]-bradykinin (100-300 micrograms/kg) attenuated the suppressive effect of captopril on alcohol intake. The saline vehicle or the bradykinin antagonist alone did not alter alcohol intake. In Experiment 2, bradykinin was administered daily at 100, 200, and 400 micrograms/kg doses SC either alone or in combination with captopril 10 mg/kg IP. Neither bradykinin nor captopril by themselves changed alcohol or water intake. Bradykinin combined with captopril stimulated water intake and reduced alcohol intake by up to 70%. This effect was not due to drug-induced changes in the pharmacokinetics of alcohol. The angiotensin II receptor antagonist [Sar1,Thr8]-angiotensin II at 250 and 500 micrograms/kg SC attenuated the stimulation of water intake but not the reduction in alcohol intake. It is suggested that by inhibiting kininase II, ACE inhibitors extend the duration of action of bradykinin and thereby unmask a potent inhibition of alcohol intake mediated by kinins--an effect that is dissociable from the accompanying stimulation of water intake. Taken together, these results point to an involvement of the kinin system in the regulation of alcohol intake and in particular to a role of bradykinin in the suppressive effect of ACE inhibitors on alcohol intake.