Blends of poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene oxide)/polyamide 6 toughened by maleated polystyrene‐based copolymers: Mechanical properties,morphology, and rheology

Poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene oxide)/polyamide 6 (PPO/PA6 30/70) blends were impact modified by addition of three kinds of maleated polystyrene‐based copolymers, i.e., maleated styrene‐ethylene‐butylene‐styrene copolymer (SEBS‐g‐MA), maleated methyl methacrylate‐butadiene‐styrene copolymer (MBS‐g‐MA), and maleated acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene copolymer (ABS‐g‐MA). The mechanical properties, morphology and rheological behavior of the impact modified PPO/PA6 blends were investigated. The selective location of the maleated copolymers in one phase or at interface accounted for the different toughening effects of the maleated copolymer, which is closely related to their molecular structure and composition. SEBS‐g‐MA was uniformly dispersed in PPO phase and greatly toughened PPO/PA6 blends even at low temperature. MBS‐g‐MA particles were mainly dispersed in the PA6 phase and around the PPO phase, resulting in a significant enhancement of the notched Izod impact strength of PPO/PA6 blends from 45 J/m to 281 J/m at the MBS‐g‐MA content of 20 phr. In comparison, the ABS‐g‐MA was mainly dispersed in PA6 phase without much influencing the original mechanical properties of the PPO/PA6 blend. The different molecule structure and selective location of the maleated copolymers in the blends were reflected by the change of rheological behavior as well. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

Toughening of polyamide 6 with a maleic anhydride functionalized acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene copolymer

Maleic anhydride functionalized acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS‐g‐MA) copolymers were prepared via an emulsion polymerization process. The ABS‐g‐MA copolymers were used to toughen polyamide 6 (PA‐6). Fourier transform infrared results show that the maleic anhydride (MA) grafted onto the polybutadiene phase of acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS). Rheological testing identified chemical reactions between PA‐6 and ABS‐g‐MA. Transmission electron microscopy and scanning electron microscopy displayed the compatibilization reactions between MA of ABS‐g‐MA and the amine and/or amide groups of PA‐6 chain ends, which improved the disperse morphology of the ABS‐g‐MA copolymers in the PA‐6 matrix. The blends compatibilized with ABS‐g‐MA exhibited notched impact strengths of more than 900 J/m. A 1 wt % concentration of MA in ABS‐g‐MA appeared sufficient to improve the impact properties and decreased the brittle–ductile transition temperature from 50 to 10°C. Scanning electron microscopy results show that the shear yielding of the PA‐6 matrix was the major toughening mechanism. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Effects of the polybutadiene/poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) ratio in a polybutadiene‐g‐poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) impact modifier on the morphology and mechanical behavior of acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene blends

Polybutadiene‐g‐poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (PB‐g‐SAN) impact modifiers with different polybutadiene (PB)/poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) ratios ranging from 20.5/79.5 to 82.7/17.3 were synthesized by seeded emulsion polymerization. Acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS) blends with a constant rubber concentration of 15 wt % were prepared by the blending of these PB‐g‐SAN copolymers and SAN resin. The influence of the PB/SAN ratio in the PB‐g‐SAN impact modifier on the mechanical behavior and phase morphology of ABS blends was investigated. The mechanical tests showed that the impact strength and yield strength of the ABS blends had their maximum values as the PB/SAN ratio in the PB‐g‐SAN copolymer increased. A dynamic mechanical analysis of the ABS blends showed that the glass‐transition temperature of the rubbery phase shifted to a lower temperature, the maximum loss peak height of the rubbery phase increased and then decreased, and the storage modulus of the ABS blends increased with an increase in the PB/SAN ratio in the PB‐g‐SAN impact modifier. The morphological results of the ABS blends showed that the dispersion of rubber particle in the matrix and its internal structure were influenced by the PB/SAN ratio in the PB‐g‐SAN impact modifiers. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 98: 2165–2171, 2005     

Effects of maleated styrene–(ethylene‐co‐butene)–styrene on the morphology and mechanical and thermal properties of polystyrene/polyamide 1212 blends

Polystyrene (PS)/polyamide 1212 (PA 1212) blends were compatibilized with a maleated triblock copolymer of styrene–(ethylene‐co‐butene)–styrene (SEBS‐g‐MA). Scanning electron microscopy revealed that the addition of SEBS‐g‐MA was beneficial to the dispersion of PA 1212 in the PS matrix because of the reaction between them. The variation of the fraction of SEBS‐g‐MA in the blends allowed the manipulation of the phase structure, which first formed a sheetlike structure and then formed a cocontinuous phase containing PA 1212/SEBS‐g‐MA core–shell morphologies. As a result, the mechanical properties, especially the Charpy notched impact resistance, were significantly improved with the addition of SEBS‐g‐MA. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) data indicated that the strong interaction between SEBS‐g‐MA and PA 1212 in the blends retarded the crystallization of PA 1212. The heat distortion temperature of the compatibilized blends was improved in comparison with that of the unmodified blend, probably because of the apparent increase in the glass‐transition temperature with an increasing concentration of SEBS‐g‐MA. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 95: 1354–1360, 2005     

Isotactic polypropylene toughened with poly(acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene): Compatibilizing role of maleic anhydride grafted polypropylene

The β‐nucleating activity and toughening effect of acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS) graft copolymer on isotactic polypropylene (iPP) and the compatibilizing role of maleic anhydride grafted polypropylene (PP‐g‐MAH) on the iPP/ABS blends were investigated. The results show that ABS can induce the formation of β‐crystal in iPP, and its β‐nucleating efficiency depends on its concentration and dispersibility. The relative content of β‐crystal form is up to 36.19% with the addition of 2% ABS. The tensile and impact properties of the iPP were dramatically enhanced by introducing ABS. The incorporation of PP‐g‐MAH into the iPP/ABS blends inhibits the formation of β‐crystal. The crystallization peaks of the blends shift toward higher temperature, due to the heterogeneous nucleation effect of PP‐g‐MAH on iPP. The toughness of iPP/ABS blends improved due to favorable interfacial interaction resulting from the compatibilization of PP‐g‐MAH is significantly better than the β‐crystal toughening effect induced by ABS. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 59:E317–E326, 2019. © 2019 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Application of styrene‐acrylonitrile random copolymer–polyarylate block copolymer as reactive compatibilizer for polyamide and acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene blends

Styrene‐acrylonitrile random copolymer (SAN) and polyarylate (PAr) block copolymer were applied as a reactive compatibilizer for polyamide‐6 (PA‐6)/acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene (ABS) copolymer blends. The SAN–PAr block copolymer was found to be effective for compatibilization of PA‐6/ABS blends. With the addition of 3.0–5.0 wt % SAN–PAr block copolymer, the ABS‐rich phase could be reduced to a smaller size than 1.0 μm in the 70/30 and 50/50 PA‐6/ABS blends, although it was several microns in the uncompatibilized blends. As a result, for the blends compatibilized with 3–5 wt % block copolymer the impact energy absorption reached the super toughness region in the 70/30 and 50/50 PA‐6/ABS compositions. The compatibilization mechanism of PA‐6/ABS by the SAN–PAr block copolymer was investigated by tetrahydrofuran extraction of the SAN–PAr block copolymer/PA‐6 blends and the model reactions between the block copolymer and low molecular weight compounds. The results of these experiments indicated that the SAN–PAr block copolymer reacted with the PA‐6 during the melt mixing process via an in situ transreaction between the ester units in the PAr chain and the terminal amine in the PA‐6. As a result, SAN–PAr/PA‐6 block copolymers were generated during the melt mixing process. The SAN–PAr block copolymer was supposed to compatibilize the PA‐6 and ABS blend by anchoring the PAr/PA‐6 and SAN chains to the PA‐6 and ABS phases, respectively. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 83: 2300–2313, 2002     

Effect of compatibilizer in acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene toughened nylon 6 blends: Ductile–brittle transition temperature

The ductile–brittle transition temperatures were determined for compatibilized nylon 6/acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene (PA6/ABS) copolymer blends. The compatibilizers used for those blends were methyl methacrylate‐co‐maleic anhydride (MMA‐MAH) and MMA‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate (MMA‐GMA). The ductile–brittle transition temperatures were found to be lower for blends compatibilized through maleate modified acrylic polymers. At room temperature, the PA6/ABS binary blend was essentially brittle whereas the ternary blends with MMA‐MAH compatibilizer were supertough and showed a ductile–brittle transition temperature at ?10°C. The blends compatibilized with maleated copolymer exhibited impact strengths of up to 800 J/m. However, the blends compatibilized with MMA‐GMA showed poor toughness at room temperature and failed in a brittle manner at subambient temperatures. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 2643–2647, 2003     

Polylactide toughening with epoxy‐functionalized grafted acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene particles

Glycidyl methacrylate functionalized acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS‐g‐GMA) particles were prepared and used to toughen polylactide (PLA). The characteristic absorption at 1728 cm^?1 of the Fourier transform infrared spectra indicated that glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) was grafted onto the polybutadiene phase of acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS). Chemical reactions analysis indicated that compatibilization and crosslinking reactions took place simultaneously between the epoxy groups of ABS‐g‐GMA and the end carboxyl or hydroxyl groups of PLA and that the increase of GMA content improved the reaction degree. Scanning electron microscopy results showed that 1 wt % GMA was sufficient to satisfy the compatibilization and that ABS‐g‐GMA particles with 1 wt % GMA dispersed in PLA uniformly. A further increase of GMA content induced the agglomeration of ABS‐g‐GMA particles because of crosslinking reactions. Dynamic mechanical analysis testing showed that the miscibility between PLA and ABS improved with the introduction of GMA onto ABS particles because of compatibilization reactions. The storage modulus decreased for the PLA blends with increasing GMA content. The decrease in the storage modulus was due to the chemical reactions in the PLA/ABS‐g‐GMA blends, which improved the viscosity and decreased the crystallization of PLA. A notched impact strength of 540 J/m was achieved for the PLA/ABS‐g‐GMA blend with 1 wt % GMA, which was 27 times than the impact strength of pure PLA, and a further increase in the GMA content in the ABS‐g‐GMA particles was not beneficial to the toughness improvement. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Melt‐mixed polypropylene/acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene blends with multiwall carbon nanotubes: Effect of compatibilizer and modifier on morphology and electrical conductivity

Cocontinuous blends of 45/55 polypropylene (PP)/acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene (ABS) with multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWNT) were prepared by melt‐mixing in a conical twin‐screw microcompounder. PP‐grafted‐maleic anhydride (PP‐g‐MA) and styrene MA were used as compatibilizers for PP/ABS blends. Scanning electron microscopic observations showed phase segregation of PP‐g‐MA in the blends. State of dispersion of MWNT in the presence or absence of the compatibilizers was assessed through AC electrical conductivity measurements and crystallization studies of the blends. An improvement in AC electrical conductivity was observed in blends in presence of either styrene MA or dual compatibilizers. The lowest electrical percolation threshold was achieved at 0.1 wt % of MWNT using sodium salt of 6‐amino hexanoic acid‐modified MWNT. Significant increase in crystallization temperature of PP phase of blends with MWNT was observed in the presence of compatibilizers as compared to blends without compatibilizers. An attempt has been made to address the complex issues of phase segregation, compatibilization, and dispersion of MWNT in cocontinuous blends of PP/ABS. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Effect of maleic anhydride grafted polybutadiene on the compatibility of polyamide 66/acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene copolymer blend

The addition of maleic anhydride grafted polybutadiene (PB‐g‐MAH) can greatly improve the compatibility of polyamide 66 (PA66)/acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene copolymer (ABS) blends. Unlike the commonly used compatibilizers in polyamide/ABS blends, PB‐g‐MAH is compatible with the ABS particles' core phase polybutadiene (PB), rather than the shell styrene‐acrylonitrile (SAN). The compatibility and interaction of the components in the blends were characterized by Fourier transform‐infrared spectra (FTIR), Molau tests, melt flow index (MFI), dynamic mechanical analyses (DMA), and scanning electron microscopic (SEM) observations. The results show that PB‐g‐MAH can react with the amino end groups in PA66 while entangle with the PB phase in ABS. In this way, the compatibilizer anchors at the interface of PA66/ABS blend. The morphology study of the fracture sections before and after tensile test reveals that the ABS particles were dispersed uniformly in the PA66 matrix and the interfacial adhesion between PA66 and ABS was increased significantly. The mechanical properties of the blends thus were enhanced with the improving of the compatibility. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2012. © 2011 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Thermal behavior and morphology of polyamide 6 based multicomponent blends

The thermal behavior and morphology of multicomponent blends based on PA6, polyamide 6 (PA6)/styrene–acrylonitirle copolymer (SAN), PA6/acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene terpolymer (ABS), and their compatibilized blends with styrene–acrylonitrile–maleic anhydride copolymer (SANMA) were studied using DSC and SEM. The blends were prepared in a twin‐screw extruder under similar processing conditions, keeping the PA6 content fixed at 50 wt %. It was found that, in all the blends, the second component had a nucleating effect and improved the overall degree and rate of crystallization of PA6, whereas addition of a compatibilizer slightly diminished these effects and resulted in significant changes in the blend morphology. The nucleating effect and consequent changes in the crystallization behavior was attributed to the presence of SAN, which is a common component in all the blends. The T_g of PA6 in the blends with a cocontinuous morphology, due to the connectivity between the phases, is higher than in the blends with a disperse‐type morphology. The compatibilized blends have a lower crystallization rate and nucleation ability with a cocontinuous morphology, whereas the uncompatibilized blends have a higher crystallization rate with a higher nucleation ability and a disperse and/or a coarse cocontinuous morphology. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 84: 2753–2759, 2002     

Blends of recycled polycarbonate and acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene: comparing the effect of reactive compatibilizers on mechanical and morphological properties

Blends of recycled polycarbonate (PC) and acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS) were prepared and some mechanical and morphological properties were investigated. To compatibilize these blends, ABS‐g‐(maleic anhydride) (ABS‐g‐MA) and (ethylene–vinyl acetate)‐g‐(maleic anhydride) (EVA‐g‐MA) with similar degree of grafting of 1.5% were used. To compare the effect of the type of compatibilizer on mechanical properties, blends were prepared using 3, 5 and 10 phr of each compatibilizer. A co‐rotating twin‐screw extruder was used for blending. The results showed that ABS‐g‐MA had no significant effect on the tensile strength of the blends while EVA‐g‐MA decreased the tensile strength, the maximum decrease being about 9.6% when using 10 phr of this compatibilizer. The results of notched Charpy impact strength tests showed that EVA‐g‐MA increased the impact strength of blends more than ABS‐g‐MA. The maximum value of this increase occurred when using 5 phr of each compatibilizer, it being about 54% for ABS‐g‐MA and 165% for EVA‐g‐MA. Scanning electron microscopy micrographs showed that the particle size of the dispersed phase was decreased in the continuous phase of PC by using the compatibilizers. Moreover, a blend without compatibilizer showed brittle behaviour while the blends containing compatibilizer showed ductile behaviour in fracture. © 2013 Society of Chemical Industry     

Augmenting the performance of acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene plastics for low‐noise dynamic applications

The main objective of this study was to enhance the performance of acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS) plastics for dynamic structural applications, including those of automobile relevance. First, ABS was modified by blending with maleic anhydride grafted styrene–ethylene–butadiene–styrene block copolymer (MA‐g‐SEBS) in various proportions. Squeaking noise characteristics were evaluated by measurement of the frictional behavior in an in‐house fabricated friction testing apparatus, and the results are explained on the basis of the change in surface energy upon modification. Detailed dynamic mechanical analyses (strain, frequency, and temperature sweep) revealed significant improvements in the damping characteristics of the modified ABS, especially that modified with 10 wt % MA‐g‐SEBS, without much sacrifice in its mechanical strength. The modulus values predicted with Kerner's model of the blends were well correlated with the morphological changes upon modification. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Recycling of blends of acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS) and polyamide

The aim of this work is to evaluate routes to upgrade recycled engineering plastics, especially mixed plastics with acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene copolymers (ABS) as the major component. A core‐shell impact modifier was successfully used to improve the impact strength of blends of ABS and ABS/polycarbonate (PC) blends recycled from the automotive industry. However, the presence of other immiscible components like polyamide (PA), even in small amounts, can lead to a deterioration in the overall properties of the blends. A styrene–maleic anhydride (SMA) copolymer and other commercial polymer blends were used to promote the compatibilization of ABS and PA. The core‐shell impact modifier was again found to be an efficient additive with regard to the impact strength of the compatibilized ABS/PA blends. The results obtained with fresh material blends were quite promising. However, in blends of recycled ABS and glass‐fiber‐reinforced PA, the impact strength did not exhibit the desired behavior. The presence of poorly bonded glass fibers in the blend matrix was the probable reason for the poor impact strength compared with that of a blend of recycled ABS and mineral‐filled PA. Although functionalized triblock rubbers (SEBS–MA) can substantially enhance the impact strength of PA, they did not improve the impact strength of ABS/PA blends because the miscibility with ABS is poor. The possibilities of using commercial polymer blends to compatibilize otherwise incompatible polymer mixtures were also explored giving promising results. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 86: 2535–2543, 2002     

Melting and crystallization behaviors of compatibilized poly(trimethylene terephthalate)/acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene blends

The melting and crystallization behaviors of poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT)/acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS) blends were investigated with and without epoxy or styrene–butadiene–maleic anhydride copolymer (SBM) as a reactive compatibilizer. The existence of two separate composition-dependent glass-transition temperatures (T_g's) indicated that PTT was partially miscible with ABS over the entire composition range. The melting temperature of the PTT phase in the blends was also composition dependent and shifted to lower temperatures with increasing ABS content. Both the cold crystallization temperature and T_g of the PTT phase moved to higher temperatures in the presence of compatibilizers, which indicated their compatibilization effects on the blends. A crystallization exotherm of the PTT phase was noticed for all of the PTT/ABS blends. The crystallization behaviors were completely different at low and high ABS contents. When ABS was 0–50 wt %, the crystallization process of PTT shifted slightly to higher temperatures as the ABS content was increased. When ABS was 60 wt % or greater, PTT showed fractionated crystallization. The effects of both the epoxy and SBM compatibilizers on the crystallization of PTT were content dependent. At a lower contents of 1–3 wt % epoxy or 1 wt % SBM, the crystallization was retarded, whereas at a higher content of 5 wt %, the crystallization was accelerated. The crystallization kinetics were analyzed with a modified Avrami equation. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Mechanical,thermal, and morphological behavior of the polyamide 6/acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene blends irradiated with gamma rays

Polymeric materials with improved properties can be obtained through polymer blends. As a polymer mixture is generally immiscible and incompatible, it is necessary to use compatibilizers to improve the interfacial adhesion. Polyamide 6 (PA‐6) is an attractive polymer to engineering applications; however, it reveals processing instability and relatively low‐notched impact strength. This behavior can be modified by blending with acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS) copolymer. In this study, blends of PA‐6 with ABS were prepared using gamma irradiation, and the effects of ABS and ionizing radiation on the properties of PA‐6/ABS blends were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), X‐ray diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) techniques. The data showed that the presence of ABS (30 wt%) in the blend decreased the tensile strength and elongation at break with respect to pure PA‐6. The decrease in the mechanical property was observed at doses 30 and 50 kGy. ABS showed strong effect on the crystallization of PA‐6 in the PA‐6/ABS binary blends. All irradiated blends are thermally more stable than those non‐irradiated. Chemical changes can be clearly seen in FTIR spectra through two bands assigned for N? H and OH? groups. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2008. © 2007 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Preparation and performance characteristics of short‐glass‐fiber/maleated styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene/polypropylene hybrid composites

Eighty/twenty polypropylene (PP)/styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene (SEBS) and 80/20 PP/maleated styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene (SEBS‐g‐MA) blends reinforced with 30 wt % short glass fibers (SGFs) were prepared by extrusion and subsequent injection molding. The influence of the maleic anhydride (MA) functional group grafted to SEBS on the properties of SGF/SEBS/PP hybrid composites was studied. Tensile and impact tests showed that the SEBS‐g‐MA copolymer improved the yield strength and impact toughness of the hybrid composites. Extensive plastic deformation occurred at the matrix interface layer next to the fibers of the SGF/SEBS‐g‐MA/PP composites during impact testing. This was attributed to the MA functional group, which enhanced the adhesion between SEBS and SGF. Differential scanning calorimetry measurements indicated that SEBS promoted the crystallization of PP spherulites by acting as active nucleation sites. However, the MA functional group grafted to SEBS retarded the crystallization of PP. Finally, polarized optical microscopy observations confirmed the absence of transcrystallinity at the glass‐fiber surfaces of both SGF/SEBS/PP and SGF/SEBS‐g‐MA/PP hybrid composites. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 86: 1303–1311, 2002     

Characterization and Properties of Reactive Poly(lactic acid)/Polyamide 610 Biomass Blends

A low molecular weight bisphenol‐A type epoxy resin was used as a reactive compatibilizer for poly(lactic acid) (PLA)/polyamide 610 (PA 610) biomass blends. To the best of our knowledge, this blend is the first biomass PA 610 blend in the literature. The epoxy functional groups could react with the terminal groups of both PLA and PA 610. An ester–amide interchange reaction led to a polyester–polyamide copolymer formation, and improved the compatibility of PLA and PA 610. The blends with epoxy resin showed an enhancement in the phase dispersion and interfacial adhesion compared with the blend without epoxy resin. The differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis showed that the crystallization peak temperatures decreased with increasing epoxy content. The melting temperature of PA 610 decreased with the addition of PLA, but remained unchanged with increased compatibilizer dosages. The dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) showed that the glass transition temperature (T_g) of the blend, with the addition of 0.5 phr epoxy resin, slightly increased compared with that of neat PLA. However, the T_g of the blends remained unchanged with increasing epoxy resin content, and the higher content of epoxy resin in the blends resulted in improved mechanical properties and higher melt viscosity. The unnotched impact test showed that PA 610 could toughen PLA with the addition of epoxy resin. Moreover, the no‐break unnotched impact behavior was observed with the medium content of the compatibilizer, improving the notch sensitivity of PLA. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 130: 2563–2571, 2013     

Effects of maleated styrene–(ethylene‐co‐butene)–styrene on compatibilization and properties of nylon‐12,12/nylon‐6 blends

Effects of a maleated triblock copolymer of styrene–(ethylene‐co‐butene)–styrene (SEBS‐g‐MA) on compatibilization and mechanical properties of nylon‐12,12/nylon‐6 blends were investigated. The results showed that addition of SEBS‐g‐MA could improve the compatibility between nylon‐12,12 and nylon‐6. Nylon‐12,12 could disperse very well in nylon‐6 matrix, although the dispersion of nylon‐6 was poor when nylon‐6 was the dispersed phase. At a fixed nylon‐12,12/nylon‐6 ratio of 30/70, supertoughness was achieved with addition of 15% SEBS‐g‐MA in weight. Scanning electron microscopy of the impact‐fractured surface indicated that cavitation and matrix shear yielding were the predominant mechanisms of impact energy dissipation. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 93: 1446–1453, 2004     

Polymer blends with modified coupling agent. II. Effects of LICA 44 grafted styrene–maleic anhydride copolymer on properties of flame retardant acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene blends

Flame retardant acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (FR‐ABS) blends were prepared by blending tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBA) and antimony trioxide (Sb₂O₃) into the ABS resin. LICA 44 grafted styrene–maleic anhydride (SMA‐g‐L44) copolymers were used as high molecular weight (MW) coupling agents to modify the properties of the FR‐ABS blends, and the copolymers with different LICA 44 grafting ratios were produced via the in vivo and the in situ reactions, respectively. The LICA 44 percentage and the MW of the SMA‐g‐L44 copolymers are important factors influencing the effects of the high MW coupling agent. The impact strength and the tensile yield stress of SMA‐g‐L44 modified FR‐ABS blends increased obviously. The elongation at break and the limiting oxygen index of which also showed an increasing trend after the modification. The coupling effect of SMA‐g‐L44 became weaker at a higher grafting ratio. SEM observation showed that the interfacial boundary in the FR‐ABS became fuzzy after using the SMA‐g‐L44 copolymers. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 71: 865–874, 1999