Development of Live-Load Distribution Factors for Glued-Laminated Timber Girder Bridges

This paper presents simple relationships for calculating live-load distribution factors for glued-laminated timber girder bridges with glued-laminated timber deck panels. Analytical models were developed using the Ansys 113 finite-element program, and the results were validated using recorded data from four in-service timber bridges. The effects of the bridge span length, the spacing between girders, and the bridge width on the distribution of the live load were investigated by using the validated models. The live-load distribution factors obtained from the field test and the analytical models were compared with those obtained using the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications2 live-load distribution relations. The comparison showed that the live-load distribution factors obtained by using the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications2 were conservative. For this reason, statistical methods were used to develop accurate relationships that can be used to calculate the live-load distribution factors in the design of glued-laminated girder bridges.     

Evaluation of Load Distribution Factor by Series Solution for Orthotropic Bridge Decks

In bridge engineering, the three-dimensional behavior of a bridge system is usually reduced to the analysis of a T-beam section, loaded by an equivalent fraction of the applied live load, which is called the live load distribution factor (LDF). The LDF is defined in the both the AASHTO Standard Specifications and the LRFD Specifications primarily for concrete slabs and has inherent applicable limitations. This paper provides explicit formulas using series solutions for LDF of orthotropic bridge decks, applicable to various materials but intended for fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) decks. The present formulation considers important parameters that represent the response characteristics of the structure that are often omitted or limited in the AASHTO Specifications. A one-term series solution is proposed based on the macroflexibility approach, in which the bridge system is simplified into two major components, deck and stringers. The governing equations for the two components are obtained separately, and the deflections and interaction forces are solved by ensuring displacement compatibility at stringer lines. The LDF is calculated as the ratio of the single stringer interaction force to the summation of total stringer interaction forces. To verify this solution, a finite-element (FE) parametric study is conducted on 66 simply supported concrete slab-on-steel girder bridges. The results from the series solution correlates well with the FE results. It is also illustrated that the series solution can be applied to predict LDF for FRP deck-on-steel girder bridges, by favorable comparisons among the analytical, FE, and testing results for a one-third-scale bridge model. The scale test specimen consists of an FRP sandwich deck attached to steel stringers by a mechanical connector. The series solution is further used to obtain multiple regression functions for the LDF in terms of nondimensional variables, which can be used for simplified design purposes.     

Live Load Distribution Formulas for Single-Span Prestressed Concrete Integral Abutment Bridge Girders

In this study, live load distribution formulas for the girders of single-span integral abutment bridges (IABs) are developed. For this purpose, two and three dimensional finite-element models (FEMs) of several IABs are built and analyzed. In the analyses, the effects of various superstructure properties such as span length, number of design lanes, prestressed concrete girder size, and spacing as well as slab thickness are considered. The results from the analyses of two and three dimensional FEMs are then used to calculate the live load distribution factors (LLDFs) for the girders of IABs as a function of the above mentioned parameters. The LLDFs for the girders are also calculated using the AASHTO formulas developed for simply supported bridges (SSBs). The comparison of the analyses results revealed that LLDFs for girder moments and exterior girder shear of IABs are generally smaller than those calculated for SSBs using AASHTO formulas especially for short spans. However, AASHTO LLDFs for interior girder shear are found to be in good agreement with those obtained for IABs. Consequently, direct live load distribution formulas and correction factors to the current AASHTO live load distribution equations are developed to estimate the girder live load moments and exterior girder live load shear for IABs with prestressed concrete girders. It is observed that the developed formulas yield a reasonably good estimate of live load effects in prestressed concrete IAB girders.     

Design for Shear in Curved Composite Multiple Steel Box Girder Bridges

Modern highway bridges are often subject to tight geometric restrictions and, in many cases, must be built in curved alignment. These bridges may have a cross section in the form of a multiple steel box girder composite with a concrete deck slab. This type of cross section is one of the most suitable for resisting the torsional, distortional, and warping effects induced by the bridge’s curvature. Current design practice in North America does not specifically deal with shear distribution in horizontally curved composite multiple steel box girder bridges. In this paper an extensive parametric study, using an experimentally calibrated finite-element model, is presented, in which simply supported straight and curved prototype bridges are analyzed to determine their shear distribution characteristics under dead load and under AASHTO live loadings. The parameters considered in this study are span length, number of steel boxes, number of traffic lanes, bridge aspect ratio, degree of curvature, and number and stiffness of cross bracings and of top-chord systems. Results from tests on five box girder bridge models verify the finite-element model. Based on the results from the parametric study simple empirical formulas for maximum shears (reactions) are developed that are suitable for the design office. A comparison is made with AASHTO and CHBDC formulas for straight bridges. An illustrative example of the design is presented.     

Development and Implementation of a Continuous Strain Monitoring System on a Multi-Girder Composite Steel Bridge

This paper describes the implementation and evaluation of a long-term strain monitoring system on a three-span, multisteel girder composite bridge located on the interstate system. The bridge is part of a network of bridges that are currently being monitored in Connecticut. The three steel girders are simply supported, whereas the concrete slab is continuous over the interior supports. The bridge has been analyzed using the standard AASHTO Specifications and the analytical predictions have been compared with the field monitoring results. The study has included determination of the location of the neutral axes and the evaluation of the load distributions to the different girders when large trucks cross the bridge. A finite-element analysis of the bridge has been carried out to further study the distribution of live load stresses in the steel girders and to study how continuity of the slabs at the interior joints would influence the overall behavior. The results of the continuous data collection are being used to evaluate the influence of truck traffic on the bridge and to establish a baseline for long-term monitoring.     

Influence of Skew Angle on Reinforced Concrete Slab Bridges

The effect of a skew angle on simple-span reinforced concrete bridges is presented in this paper using the finite-element method. The parameters investigated in this analytical study were the span length, slab width, and skew angle. The finite-element analysis (FEA) results for skewed bridges were compared to the reference straight bridges as well as the American Association for State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Standard Specifications and LRFD procedures. A total of 96 case study bridges were analyzed and subjected to AASHTO HS-20 design trucks positioned close to one edge on each bridge to produce maximum bending in the slab. The AASHTO Standard Specifications procedure gave similar results to the FEA maximum longitudinal bending moment for a skew angle less than or equal to 20°. As the skew angle increased, AASHTO Standard Specifications overestimated the maximum moment by 20% for 30°, 50% for 40°, and 100% for 50°. The AASHTO LRFD Design Specifications procedure overestimated the FEA maximum longitudinal bending moment. This overestimate increased with the increase in the skew angle, and decreased when the number of lanes increased; AASHTO LRFD overestimated the longitudinal bending moment by up to 40% for skew angles less than 30° and reaching 50% for 50°. The ratio between the three-dimensional FEA longitudinal moments for skewed and straight bridges was almost one for bridges with skew angle less than 20°. This ratio decreased to 0.75 for bridges with skew angles between 30 and 40°, and further decreased to 0.5 as the skew angle of the bridge increased to 50°. This decrease in the longitudinal moment ratio is offset by an increase of up to 75% in the maximum transverse moment ratio as the skew angle increases from 0 to 50°. The ratio between the FEA maximum live-load deflection for skewed bridges and straight bridges decreases in a pattern consistent with that of the longitudinal moment. This ratio decreased from one for skew angles less than 10° to 0.6 for skew angles between 40 and 50°.     

Influence of Secondary Elements and Deck Cracking on the Lateral Load Distribution of Steel Girder Bridges

The AASHTO LRFD load distribution factor equation was developed based on elastic finite element analysis considering only primary members, i.e., the effects of secondary elements such as lateral bracing and parapets were not considered. Meanwhile, many bridges have been identified as having significant cracking in the concrete deck. Even though deck cracking is a well-known phenomenon, the significance of pre-existing cracks on the live load distribution has not yet been assessed. The purpose of this research is to investigate the effect of secondary elements and deck cracking on the lateral load distribution of girder bridges. First, secondary elements such as diaphragms and parapets were modeled using the finite element method, and the calculated load distribution factors were compared with the code-specified values. Second, the effects of typical deck cracking and crack types that have a major effect on load distribution were identified through a number of nonlinear finite element analyses. It was established that the presence of secondary elements may produce load distribution factors up to 40% lower than the AASHTO LRFD values. Longitudinal cracking was found to increase the load distribution factor by up to 17% when compared to the LRFD value while the transverse cracking was found to not significantly influence the transverse distribution of moment.     

Distribution Factors for Curved Continuous Composite Box-Girder Bridges

The use of horizontally curved composite box-girder bridges in modern highway systems has become increasingly popular for economic as well as for aesthetic considerations. Based on a recent literature review on the design of box-girder bridges, it was observed that a simple design method for curved bridges, based on load distribution factors for stresses and shears, is as yet unavailable. This paper presents the results of an extensive parametric study, using a finite element method, in which the structural responses of 240 two-equal-span continuous curved box-girder bridges of various geometries were investigated. The parameters considered in this study included span-to-radius of curvature ratio, span length, number of lanes, number of boxes, web slope, number of bracings, and truck loading type. Based on the data generated from this study, empirical formulas for load distribution factors for maximum longitudinal flexural stresses and maximum deflection due to dead load as well as AASHTO live loading were deduced. An illustrative design example is presented.     

Shear Live-Load Distribution Factors for I-Girder Bridges

A full scale, single lane test bridge was used to evaluate a typical slab-on-girder bridge’s response to shear. The results of the shear load test provided the means to evaluate the level of detail for a finite element model that is required to accurately replicate the behavior of bridges subject to shear loads. This finite element modeling scheme was then used to evaluate more than 200 finite element bridge models. The bridge models investigated the effects of girder spacing, span length, overhang distance and skew angle on the shear live-load distribution factor. The finite element shear distribution factors were compared with those calculated according to the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials load and resistance factor design (AASHTO LRFD) specifications. It was found that the AASHTO LRFD procedure accurately predicted the shear distribution factor for changes in girder spacing and span length. However, the LRFD shear distribution factor for the exterior girder was found to be unconservative for certain overhang distances and overly conservative for the interior girder for higher skew angles. Alternative equations are provided for the single and multilane exterior girder correction factor.     

Predicted and Measured Performance of Prestressed Concrete Bridges

Testing results of six existing prestressed concrete bridges are used to evaluate analytical methodologies. These bridges cover different span lengths, number of lanes, and skew angles. Strains, load distribution factors, and ratings predicted by finite-element analyses and AASHTO code specifications are compared with those from measurements. The comparison reveals a significant difference between the analytical and test results due to the effects of many field factors. Factors that exist in reality but whose effects on bridge performance cannot easily be quantified are defined as field factors. Due to these field factors, existing bridges are different from idealized calculation models and are thus defined as field bridges. To examine this difference and to quantify their effects, some field factors are modeled in a more refined finite-element analysis. It is found that the field factors have a larger effect on the maximum strain than on the load distribution factor. Parametric studies of the effects of diaphragms, bearing stiffness, and skew angles on the load distribution and maximum strain are conducted.     

Assessment of Bridge Remaining Fatigue Life through Field Strain Measurement

With the aging of existing steel bridges and the accumulated stress cycles under traffic loads, assessment of remaining fatigue life for continuing service has become more important than ever, especially for decisions on structure replacement, deck replacement, or other major retrofits. Experience from engineering practice indicates that fatigue analysis based on specification loads and distribution factors usually underestimates the remaining fatigue life of existing bridges by overestimating the live load stress ranges. Fatigue evaluation based on field-measured stress range histograms under actual traffic load proves to be a more accurate and efficient method for existing bridges. This paper describes the application of such a method in assessing the remaining fatigue life of bridge structures. Current AASHTO specifications for fatigue evaluation of existing bridges are reviewed and compared. Case studies of three major highway bridges are discussed. Finally, a procedure is proposed for evaluating fatigue life of existing bridges through field strain measurement.     

Full-Scale Test of Continuity Diaphragms in Skewed Concrete Bridge Girders

Continuity diaphragms used in prestressed girder bridges on skewed bents have caused difficulties in detailing and construction. The results of the field verification for the effectiveness of continuity diaphragms for skewed, continuous, and prestressed concrete girder bridges are presented. The current design concept and bridge parameters that were considered include skew angle and the ratio of beam spacing to span (aspect ratio). A prestressed concrete bridge with continuity diaphragms and a skewed angle of 48° was selected for full-scale test by a team of engineers from Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development and the Federal Highway Administration. The live load tests performed with a comprehensive instrumentation plan provided a fundamental understanding of the load transfer mechanism through these diaphragms. The findings indicated that the effects of the continuity diaphragms were negligible and they can be eliminated. The superstructure of the bridge could be designed with link slab. Thus, the bridge deck would provide the continuity over the support, improve the riding quality, enhance the structural redundancy, and reduce the expansion joint installation and maintenance costs.     

Lateral Load Distribution in Curved Steel I-Girder Bridges

The purpose of this paper is to develop new formulas for live load distribution in horizontally curved steel I-girder bridges. The formulas are developed by utilizing computer model results for a number of different horizontally curved steel I-girder bridges. The bridges used in this study are modeled as generalized grillage beam systems composed of horizontally curved beam elements for steel girders and substructure elements for lateral wind bracing and cross frames which consist of truss elements. Warping torsion is taken into consideration in the analysis. The effect of numerous parameters, including radius of curvature, girder spacing, overhang, etc., on the load distribution are studied. Key parameters affecting live load distribution are identified and simplified formulas are developed to predict positive moment, negative moment, and shear distribution for one-lane and multiple-lane loading. Comparisons of the formulas with finite element method and grillage analysis show that the proposed formulas have more accurate results than the various available American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials specifications. The formulas developed in this study will assist bridge engineers and researchers in predicting the actual live load distribution in horizontally curved steel I-girder bridges.     

Simplified Method of Lateral Distribution of Live Load Moment

This paper introduces a simplified method, known as Henry’s method, for the calculation of distribution factors of the live load moment. Using the simplified method, the live load effects are equally distributed in all beams, including interior and exterior beams. This method has been used in Tennessee for nearly four decades. It offers advantages in simplicity of calculation and flexibility in application. To carefully examine the simplified method, 24 actual bridges of six different types of superstructures were selected for the study. The distribution factors of actual bridges using Henry’s method were compared with the ones from the AASHTO LRFD, the AASHTO standard, and finite-element analysis. In the comparison study, the effects of bridge superstructure types and key parameters that significantly affected the calculation of distribution factors are discussed. Based on the results of the comparison and evaluation, a modified Henry’s method was proposed by introducing modification factors to Henry’s method. With proper modification, the simplified method can be used to determine reasonable and reliable distribution factors of the live load moment.     

Influence of Parapets and Aspect Ratio on Live-Load Distribution

Significant discrepancies in girder distribution factors have been observed between actual bridge field-testing results and AASHTO code predictions. One of the reasons for the discrepancies is that code methods fail to account for the existence of secondary members such as parapets in bridges. This research investigates the effects of parapets and bridge aspect ratio on live-load moment distribution for bridge girders. The influence on distribution factors of parapets with varying overhang lengths and of aspect ratio with varying roadway width is investigated. To study the effects of parapets and aspect ratios, 34 two-span continuous bridges with a 0° or a 45° skew angle and with varied structure parameters are analyzed using the finite element method. The distribution factors obtained from these analyses are compared with those from the AASHTO methods. The presence of parapets is shown to reduce distribution factors by as much as 36 and 13% for exterior and interior girders, respectively. The effect of parapets is slightly less for skewed bridges. Aspect ratio is shown to have very little effect on distribution factors until the ratio exceeds 1.8.     

Experimental Verification of Horizontally Curved I-Girder Bridge Behavior

Past research has been conducted on the behavior of horizontally curved girders by testing scaled models and full-scale laboratory bridges and by analyzing numerical models. Current design specifications are based on this past research; however, little field data of in-service bridges exist to support the findings of the past research on which the current design criteria are based. The purpose of the present study was to gather field response data from three in-service, curved, steel I-girder bridges to determine behavior when subjected to a test truck and normal truck traffic. Transverse bending distribution factors and dynamic load allowance were calculated from the data collected. Numerical grillage models of the three bridges were developed to determine if a simple numerical model will accurately predict actual field measured transverse bending distribution, deflections, and cross-frame and diaphragm shear forces. The present study found that AASHTO specifications are conservative for both dynamic load allowance and transverse bending moment distribution. The grillage models were found to predict with reasonable accuracy the behavior of a curved I-girder bridge.     

Field Testing and Analysis of CRC Deck Girder Bridges

This paper presents findings of field tests and analysis of two conventionally reinforced concrete (CRC) deck girder bridges designed in the 1950s. The bridges are in-service and exhibit diagonal cracks. Stirrup strains in the bridge girders at high shear regions were used to estimate distribution factors for shear. Impact factors based on the field tests are reported. Comparison of field measured responses with AASHTO factors was performed. Three-dimensional elastic finite-element analysis was employed to model the tested bridges and determine distribution factors specifically for shear. Eight-node shell elements were used to model the decks, diaphragms, bent caps, and girders. Beam elements were used to model columns under the bent caps. The analytically predicted distribution factors were compared with the field test data. Finally, the bridge finite-element models were employed to compare load distribution factors for shear computed using procedures in the AASHTO LRFD and Standard Specifications.     

Load Configuration and Lateral Distribution of NATO Wheeled Military Trucks for Steel I-Girder Bridges

This paper presents the lateral load distribution of various North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) wheeled military trucks on a simple-span steel I-girder bridge (L = 36?m). The military trucks are classified into the military load classification (MLC) system. The MLC trucks demonstrate different load configurations when compared to the standard HS20 truck in terms of wheel-line spacing, number of axles, and weight. A calibrated three-dimensional finite-element analysis is conducted to examine the MLC load effects. The applicability of the AASHTO LRFD provisions is evaluated using 72 different load models. The wheel-line spacing and weight of the MLC trucks cause different flexural behavior and load distributions of the bridge when compared to those of HS20. The current AASHTO LRFD approach to determine live load distribution factors may be reasonably applicable to the MLC trucks, including approximately 20% of conservative predictions.     

Effect of Skewness on the Distribution of Live Load Reaction at Piers of Skewed Continuous Bridges

This paper presents a study of the skewness effect on live load reactions at the piers of continuous bridges. Two prestressed concrete I-beam bridges and one steel I-girder bridge were selected for the study. To evaluate the skew effect, the skew angle of the bridges was varied from 0 to 60°. Live load reaction at support and shear at the beam ends of the selected bridges were determined using finite-element analysis. The comparison of the distribution factors of live load reactions and shear revealed that the distribution factor of reaction at piers was higher than that of shear at beam ends near the same support. The increase in the reaction distribution factor was more significant than that in the shear distribution factor in the interior beam line when the skew angle was greater than 30°. The LRFD shear equations and the Lever rule method could conservatively predict live load reaction distribution for piers in exterior beam lines but underestimate live load reaction distribution in interior beam lines. It is recommended that more research be performed for the distribution factor of live load reaction to quantify the responses.     

Ultimate Capacity Destructive Testing and Finite-Element Analysis of Steel I-Girder Bridges

Current bridge design and rating techniques are based at the component level and thus cannot predict the ultimate capacity of bridges, which is a function of system-level interactions. While advances in computer technology have made it possible to conduct accurate system-level analyses, which can be used to design more efficient bridges and produce more accurate ratings of existing structures, the knowledge base surrounding system-level bridge behavior is still too small for these methods to be widely considered reliable. Thus, to advance system-level design and rating, a 1/5-scale slab-on-steel girder bridge was tested to ultimate capacity and then analytically modeled. The test demonstrated the significant reserve capacity of the steel girders, and the response of the specimen was governed by the degradation of the reinforced-concrete deck. To accurately capture the response of the specimen in an analytical model, the degradation of the deck and other key features of the specimen were modeled by using a dynamic analysis algorithm in a commercially available finite-element analysis program ABAQUS.