超高效液相色谱串联质谱同时测定酒类产品中多种人工合成甜味剂

建立超高效液相色谱-电喷雾电离串联质谱（ultra performance liquid chromatography-electro spray ionizationtandem mass spectrometry,UPLC-ESI-MS-MS）同时测定酒类产品中安赛蜜、糖精钠、甜蜜素、三氯蔗糖、阿斯巴甜、阿力甜和纽甜人工合成甜味剂的分析方法。方法采用ZORBAX Eclipse XDB-C18柱（100 mm×4.6 mm,1.8 μm）色谱柱,柱温50 ℃。流动相由A（甲醇）和B（体积分数0.1%甲酸和20 mmol/L甲酸铵溶液,pH 4.0）组成,流速为0.5 mL/min,梯度洗脱。在ESI负离子模式下,采用多反应监测模式进行测定,可以在12.5 min内完成7 种人工合成甜味剂的检测。安赛蜜、糖精钠、甜蜜素、三氯蔗糖、阿斯巴甜、阿力甜和纽甜在10～5 000 μg/L范围内有良好的线性关系,相关系数大于0.999。安赛蜜、糖精钠、甜蜜素、三氯蔗糖、阿斯巴甜、阿力甜和纽甜检出限分别为4、6、4、8、4、4、2 μg/L,回收率在88.3%～98.3%之间,相对标准偏差为2.1%～6.7%。该方法快速、准确,灵敏度高,适用于酒类产品中低含量人工合成甜味剂的测定。     

液相色谱串联质谱法同时测定白酒中4种甜味剂方法研究

用液相色谱串联质谱法同时测定白酒中甜蜜素、阿斯巴甜、糖精钠、安赛蜜4种人工合成甜味剂,排除了液相色谱、气相色谱等仪器测定时存在的假阳性的可能.样品只需简单前处理即可直接导入测定.采用多反应监测模式进行测定,4种人工合成甜味剂的回收率在86%～106%之间,定量检出限为5μg/L～12.5μg/L,在获得较高灵敏度的同时,大大缩短了样品检测周期,具有广阔的应用前景.     

超高效液相色谱串联质谱法同时测定白酒中6种人工合成甜味剂的方法研究

建立了超高效液相色谱串联质谱仪同时测定白酒中6种甜味剂(安赛蜜、糖精钠、甜蜜素、三氯蔗糖、阿斯巴甜和纽甜)的分析方法。白酒样品经80℃水浴加热处理后,用超纯水定容,经0.2μm滤膜过滤后上机分析。采用C_(18)柱分离,以乙腈-1‰甲酸水溶液为流动相,梯度洗脱,以质量数和保留时间定性、峰面积定量。结果表明,6种甜味剂的浓度与其峰面积在0~5 mg/L范围内呈良好线性关系,平均回收率97.4%~108.7%,RSD值1.9%~3.5%,安赛蜜、甜蜜素、阿斯巴甜的检出限为0.01 mg/L,糖精钠、纽甜、三氯蔗糖的检出限为0.02 mg/L。     

超高压液相色谱—质谱同时测定白酒中6种微量甜味剂的方法研究

为了检测白酒中6种甜味剂(安赛蜜、糖精钠、甜蜜素、三氯蔗糖、阿斯巴甜、纽甜),建立了一种超高压液相色谱质谱联用的新方法。样品预处理后,通过BEH C-18色谱柱分离,以甲醇-20 mmol/L乙酸铵水溶液为流动相进行梯度洗脱,在ESI负离子模式下检测,一次进样分析仅需10 min。以优化后的条件进行测定,6种甜味剂线性范围均在0.05~5.0 mg/L内,线性相关系数均大于0.994 5。得到安赛蜜检出限为0.05 mg/L、糖精钠、甜蜜素、纽甜检出限为0.01 mg/L、三氯蔗糖、阿斯巴甜检出限为0.1 mg/L。加标水平为0.5 mg/L和1.0 mg/L时,回收率在86.48%~116.90%之间,相对标准偏差为0.22%-3.90%。方法准确可靠、简便快速、可达到同时检测6种甜味剂的目的。     

高效液相色谱法测定无糖乳制品中4种高倍甜味剂的含量

为建立高效液相色谱法同时分离测定无糖乳制品中多种高倍甜味剂的含量,样品提取净化后,AtlantisT3C18色谱柱分离,甲醇:0.02mmol/L的硫酸铵溶液(v:v)=45:55等梯度洗脱,流速0.8mL/min,柱温30℃,二极管检测器205nm检测,进样量20μL。结果表明:糖精钠、安赛蜜、阿斯巴甜、甜蜜素4种甜味剂均能很好分离,糖精钠、安赛蜜、阿斯巴甜在浓度为1.00～20.0μg/mL,甜蜜素在浓度为0.05～0.5μg/mL范围内呈良好线性关系,RSD为1.7%～5.83%,平均加标回收率为85%～108%。该方法可同时对食品中的4种高倍甜味剂进行分离与检测,该方法灵敏度高,重复性好,为快速检测无糖乳制品中的高倍甜味剂提供技术支持。     

超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定白酒中9种甜味剂

目的建立准确、快速检测白酒中安赛蜜、糖精钠、甜蜜素、阿斯巴甜、三氯蔗糖、纽甜、阿力甜、甜菊糖苷和甜菊双糖苷9种甜味剂的超高效液相色谱-串联质谱分析方法。方法样品经沸水浴加热除去乙醇,采用超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法进行检测。以水(含10 mmol/L乙酸铵)和甲醇为流动相, HSS T3色谱柱(2.1 mm×100 mm,1.7μm)进行分离,电喷雾离子化多反应监测模式检测。结果 9种甜味剂在相应线性范围内关系良好,相关系数均≥0.999;方法回收率为85.2%～102.8%,相对标准偏差(RSD)为3.8%～7.3%;检出限为0.3～1.5μg/kg。结论该方法操作简单快速、重现性好,可用于白酒中9种甜味剂的检测。     

超高压液相色谱-质谱法测定水果中添加的3种人工合成甜味剂

目的 建立水果中3 种人工合成甜味剂(甜蜜素、糖精钠、安赛蜜)的超高压液相色谱-串联质谱 (UPLC-MS/MS)检测方法。方法 以反相C18 柱为色谱柱, 乙腈?0.02 mol/L 乙酸铵溶液为流动相, 样品经纯水 提取后用色谱柱进行分离, 串联质谱负离子多反应监测(MRM)模式测定。结果 3 种人工合成甜味剂在10~600 μg/L 范围内响应峰面积和样品质量浓度之间有良好的线性关系(相关系数r≥0.995); 甜蜜素、糖精钠和安赛蜜 的最低检出限分别为0.8、5.0、1.0 μg/kg; 在2 种添加水平下, 样品平均回收率为74.9%~111.2%, 相对标准偏 差<8%。结论 该方法前处理简单, 分析时间短, 具有良好的灵敏度和准确性, 可用于水果中甜蜜素、糖精钠、 安赛蜜的同时检测。     

LC-ESI-MS/MS测定白酒中7种甜味剂的方法研究

建立使用液相色谱-质谱联用仪测定白酒中7种甜味剂含量的分析方法。分析条件:分析柱为Agilent ZORBAX RX-C18,流动相为0.02 mol/L乙酸铵水溶液+0.1%乙酸溶液和甲醇溶液采用梯度洗脱。结果表明,该方法在14 min内完成,安赛蜜、糖精钠、甜蜜素和阿力甜在10～200μg/L的范围内线性关系良好(相关系数r=0.999),检出限是10μg/L、定量限是20μg/L;阿斯巴甜、纽甜在50～1000μg/L的范围内线性关系良好(相关系数r=0.999),检出限是50μg/L、定量限是100μg/L;三氯蔗糖在40～800μg/L的范围内线性关系良好(相关系数r=0.999),检出限是40μg/L、定量限是80μg/L。样品中添加不同浓度的甜味剂时,回收率均在85%～105%范围内,相对偏差小于2%(n=12)。该方法样品处理简单,其线性范围内、相关性、灵敏度和精密度均符合白酒中甜味剂检测方法的要求。     

超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法直接测定白酒中8种甜味剂

建立了超高效液相色谱-串联质谱仪(UPLC-MS/MS)测定白酒中8种甜味剂(安赛蜜、糖精钠、甜蜜素、阿斯巴甜、三氯蔗糖、纽甜、阿力甜和甜菊糖苷)含量的分析方法。样品经蒸馏水稀释一定倍数后,过0.22μm微孔滤膜,直接进入UPLC-MS/MS中分析检测。Waters HSS T3色谱柱为分析柱,甲醇-0.1%乙酸水溶液为流动相进行梯度洗脱,在电喷雾电离源负离子模式下,采用多反应监测模式进行检测。结果表明,8种甜味剂在10~500μg/L的范围内线性关系良好(相关系数r0.996),方法检出限在1~3μg/L之间,基质加标回收率在89%~106%之间,相对标准偏差≤9%,均可达到白酒中痕量甜味剂的检测要求。该方法前处理简单,测定快速、准确、灵敏度高,非常适合白酒中多种甜味剂的快速筛查和定量分析。     

白酒中爱德万甜及其他甜味剂的检测方法研究

该研究建立了同时检测白酒中新型甜味剂爱德万甜和安赛蜜、糖精钠、阿斯巴甜、阿力甜、纽甜的高效液相色谱多通道法。结 果表明,试样经70 ℃水浴蒸干、2 mL纯水复溶,水相滤膜过滤进样,以20 mmol/L乙酸铵和乙腈为流动相,梯度洗脱,C18柱分离,二极 管阵列检测器（DAD）检测,采用外标法定量。 阿斯巴甜、阿力甜在1.0～50 μg/mL范围内线性关系良好（相关系数R2均＞0.999 5）;爱 德万甜、安赛蜜、糖精钠和纽甜在0.1～50 μg/mL范围内线性关系良好（相关系数R2均＞0.999 9）。 爱德万甜、纽甜、安赛蜜、糖精钠检 出限为0.02 mg/kg,阿斯巴甜、阿力甜检出限为0.2 mg/kg。 相对标准偏差（RSD）＜0.5%;加标回收率为98.35%～105.25%;表明该方法 准确度、精密度良好。     

Dietary intake of artificial sweeteners by the Belgian population

This study investigated whether the Belgian population older than 15 years is at risk of exceeding ADI levels for acesulfame-K, saccharin, cyclamate, aspartame and sucralose through an assessment of usual dietary intake of artificial sweeteners and specific consumption of table-top sweeteners. A conservative Tier 2 approach, for which an extensive label survey was performed, showed that mean usual intake was significantly lower than the respective ADIs for all sweeteners. Even consumers with high intakes were not exposed to excessive levels, as relative intakes at the 95th percentile (p95) were 31% for acesulfame-K, 13% for aspartame, 30% for cyclamate, 17% for saccharin, and 16% for sucralose of the respective ADIs. Assessment of intake using a Tier 3 approach was preceded by optimisation and validation of an analytical method based on liquid chromatography with mass spectrometric detection. Concentrations of sweeteners in various food matrices and table-top sweeteners were determined and mean positive concentration values were included in the Tier 3 approach, leading to relative intakes at p95 of 17% for acesulfame-K, 5% for aspartame, 25% for cyclamate, 11% for saccharin, and 7% for sucralose of the corresponding ADIs. The contribution of table-top sweeteners to the total usual intake (<1% of ADI) was negligible. A comparison of observed intake for the total population with intake for diabetics (acesulfame-K: 3.55 versus 3.75; aspartame: 6.77 versus 6.53; cyclamate: 1.97 versus 2.06; saccharine: 1.14 versus 0.97; sucralose: 3.08 versus 3.03, expressed as mg kg(-1) bodyweight day(-1) at p95) showed that the latter group was not exposed to higher levels. It was concluded that the Belgian population is not at risk of exceeding the established ADIs for sweeteners.     

Different sweeteners in peach nectar: Ideal and equivalent sweetness

Many articles have been published with negative visions related to sugar, because people believe that its intake is related to obesity. For this reason, artificial sweeteners have received special attention. In order to substitute sucrose successfully, it is necessary to know previously sweetener concentrations that would be used and their sweetness equivalency related to sucrose. Hence, the objectives of this study were to determine the ideal sweetness in a peach nectar sweetened with sucrose, using a just-about-right scale, and the equivalent sweetness of samples sweetened with aspartame; cyclamate/saccharin blend 2:1; stevia; sucralose and acesulfame-K, using Magnitude Estimation. The concentration of sucrose considered as ideal by the consumers was 10%, with sweeteners’ equivalent concentrations of 0.054% for aspartame; 0.036% for cyclamate/saccharin blend 2:1; 0.10% for stevia; 0.016% for sucralose and 0.053% for acesulfame-K.     

Estimated intake of intense sweeteners from non-alcoholic beverages in Denmark

In 1999, 116 samples of non-alcoholic beverages were analysed for the intense sweeteners cyclamate, acesulfame-K, aspartame and saccharin. High contents of cyclamate close to the maximum permitted level in 1999 of 400 mg l^-1 were found in many soft drinks. The estimated intake of the sweeteners was calculated using the Danish Dietary Survey based on 3098 persons aged 1-80 years. The estimated intake with 90th percentiles of 0.7, 4.0 and 0.2 mg kg^-1 body weight (bw) day^-1 for acesulfame-K, aspartame and saccharin, respectively, was much lower than the acceptable daily intake (ADI) values of 15, 40 and 2.5 mg kg^-1 bw day^-1 for acesulfame-K, aspartame and saccharin, respectively. However, the 90th percentile of the estimated cyclamate intake in 1-3 year olds was close to the ADI value of 7 mg kg^-1 bw day^-1; and the 99th percentile in the 1-10 year olds far exceeded the ADI value. Boys aged 7-10 years had a significantly higher estimated intake of cyclamate than girls. The 90th percentile for the whole population was 1.8 mg kg^-1 bw day^-1. After the reduction in the maximum permitted level in the European Union in 2004 from 400 to 250 mg cyclamate l^-1, the exposure in Denmark can also be expected to be reduced. A new investigation in 2007 should demonstrate whether the problem with high cyclamate intake is now solved.     

Low-calorie sweeteners in food and food supplements on the Italian market

This study determines the occurrence and concentration levels of artificial low-calorie sweeteners (LCSs) in food and food supplements on the Italian market. The analysed sample set (290 samples) was representative of the Italian market and comprised of beverages, jams, ketchups, confectionery, dairy products, table-top sweeteners and food supplements. All samples were analysed via UPLC-MS/MS. The method was in-house validated for the analysis of seven LCSs (aspartame, acesulfame-K, saccharin, sucralose, cyclamate, neotame and neohesperidin dihydrochalcone) in food and for five LCSs (aspartame, acesulfame-K, saccharin, cyclamate and sucralose) in food supplements. Except for cyclamate in one beverage which exceeded the maximum level (ML) with 13%, all concentrations measured in food were around or below the ML. In food supplements, 40 of the 52 samples (77%) were found to be above the ML, with exceedances of up to 200% of the ML.     

Time-Intensity Parameters of Selected Carbohydrate and High Potency Sweeteners

Time-intensity (TI) sweetness curves were generated and ten TI parameters were determined for selected carbohydrate and high potency sweeteners. Samples were evalutated by trained panelists at 5% sucrose equivalency (SEV) in water for sucralose, sucrose, fructose, aspartame, cyclamate, acesulfame-K and saccharin and at 9% SEV in water and a buffered model beverage system for sucralose, sucrose, fructose, aspartame and cyclamate. When compared within each system, differences in temporal properties appeared to be concentration and media dependent. No differences in onset characteristics were observed among equisweet groups. Aftertaste characteristics differed among sweeteners only .at 9% SEV in water where high potency sweeteners tended to have somewhat longer aftertaste than nutritive sweeteners.     

超高效液相色谱-质谱联用法(UPLC-MS/MS)同时测定白酒中的微量甜味剂

以超纯水为提取溶剂,采用甲醇-0.02 mol/L乙酸铵溶液的流动相体系和负离子电离模式,用超高效液相色谱-三重四极杆质谱联用仪测定白酒中的安赛蜜、糖精钠、甜蜜素和三氯蔗糖。结果表明,安赛蜜、糖精钠、甜蜜素和三氯蔗糖线性范围在10～1000 ng/mL内R2大于0.9983,检出限分别为0.024 mg/kg、0.06 mg/kg、0.03 mg/kg、0.1 mg/kg,加标回收率大于82%,RSD小于2.01%。该方法简便灵敏,准确快速,可用于白酒中微量甜味剂的快速测定。     

非营养型甜味剂安全性研究进展

甜味剂是能使食物具有甜味非糖类物质,目前世界上广泛使用甜味剂有20余种,我国已批准使用的约15种。非营养型甜味剂是指与蔗糖甜度相等时含量其热值低于蔗糖热值2%物质,该文介绍食品工业常用几种非营养型甜味剂:糖精钠、安赛蜜、阿斯巴甜、甜蜜素,对其安全性的研究进展进行论述,以便为选择合适甜味剂提供参考。     

液相色谱-四极杆-飞行时间质谱法筛查食品中6 种人工合成甜味剂

应用高效液相色谱-四极杆-飞行时间质谱建立固体样品中甜味剂的筛查。样品经前处理后采用Eclispe XDB-C18色谱柱,以0.1%甲酸-10 mmol/L甲酸铵溶液-甲醇为流动相,梯度洗脱,电喷雾负离子模式分析检测。在 全扫描采集模式下,以准分子离子峰的峰面积定量,以化合物精确分子质量定性。各化合物在0.02～2.0 mg/L范围 内均呈现良好的线性关系,相关系数均大于0.998。样品平均添加回收率为74.5%～120.1%,相对标准偏差均小于 10.4%。本方法可满足现行法规的限量要求。     

Estimated intake of intense sweeteners from non-alcoholic beverages in Denmark, 2005

In 2005, 76 out of 177 analysed samples of non-alcoholic beverages were found to contain the intense sweeteners cyclamate, acesulfame-K, aspartame, and saccharin. The content of cyclamate did not exceed the now permitted maximum level in the European Union of 250 mg l(-1) in soft drinks. The estimated intake of the sweeteners was calculated using the Danish Dietary Survey based on 3098 persons aged 1-80 years. The estimated intake with 90th percentiles of 0.7, 0.8 and 0.2 mg kg(-1) body weight day(-1) for acesulfame-K, aspartame, and saccharin, respectively, was much lower than the acceptable daily intake values of 15, 40, 7, and 2.5 mg kg(-1) body weight day(-1) for acesulfame-K, aspartame, and saccharin, respectively, and on the same level as in the similar investigation from 1999. In contrast to the 1999 investigation, the 90th percentile of the estimated cyclamate intake in 1-3 year olds with 3.7 mg kg(-1) body weight day(-1) was in 2005 lower than the acceptable daily intake of 7 mg kg(-1) body weight day(-1). However, the 99th percentile for 1-3 year olds with 7.4 mg kg(-1) body weight day(-1) still exceeded the acceptable daily intake slightly. The 90th percentile for the whole population with 0.9 mg kg(-1) body weight day(-1) was halved compared with 1999. The reduction in the European Union of the maximum permitted level for cyclamate from 400 to 250 mg l(-1) has brought the intake of cyclamate in small children down to well below the acceptable daily intake value.