Extended conditions of application of DIN EN 1996‐3/NA for high walls

According to Eurocode 6, unreinforced masonry walls can be designed using different verification methods, whereby the simplified calculation methods are contained in Part 3 of DIN EN 1996 [1]. If the associated application limits and boundary conditions are fulfilled, a large part of the usual problems occurring in masonry construction can be dealt with without great effort. A limiting condition for the application of the simplified calculation methods is a maximum clear wall height of h = 2.75 m or h = 12 ? t. Changes in user requirements for modern buildings with masonry walls nowadays often require greater wall heights, wherefore a verification according to the general rules from DIN EN 1996‐1‐1/NA [2] is necessary. This means a considerably higher effort for the structural engineer. A considerable amount of calculations was done to verify whether the results of the simplified calculation methods are also valid for greater wall heights. The results were transferred into a consistent standardization proposal with regard to extended application limits of DIN EN 1996‐3/NA, which is contained in a new draft Amendment A3 for the National Application Document for Germany.     

Extension of the conditions for application of the simplified calculation methods according to DIN EN 1996‐3/NA for the design of unreinforced masonry walls

Dedicated to University Prof. Dr.‐Ing. Carl‐Alexander Graubner for his 60th birthday The simplified calculation methods for unreinforced masonry structures given in DIN EN 1996‐3/NA are an easily applicable design standard for an efficient and fast verification of the resistance of mainly vertically loaded masonry walls. However, the design rules are not based on mechanical models. Instead, they are empirical approaches for a simplified estimation of the load bearing capacity. For this reason, the range of application of DIN EN 1996‐3/NA is limited by several conditions to ensure a sufficient safety of this design procedure. With regard to extending the conditions for application, extensive comparative calculations were carried out. Thereby, considering clearly defined boundary conditions, the load bearing capacity according to DIN EN 1996‐3/NA was compared to that according to DIN EN 1996‐1‐1/NA. It was the aim of this comparison to identify load bearing reserves of the simplified calculation methods to point out potential for an extension regarding the maximum permissible clear wall height and the slab span. As a result, it can be stated, that an increase of the maximum wall height up to 6.0 m and the maximum slab span of 7.0 m is possible in certain cases.     

The simplified calculation method of DIN EN 1996‐3 in practice / Das vereinfachte Bemessungsverfahren von DIN EN 1996‐3 in der Praxis

The design and detailing of masonry buildings was usually undertaken in the past using the simplified procedure in Section 6 of DIN 1053‐1 (1996‐11). With the changeover to the new European code, a new procedure has been made available with the simplified calculation method of DIN EN 1996‐3, which promises similarly simple and safe handling for the user. The practical implementation of this new code has been underway for some time. The article investigates the standard design cases and explains the innovations and alterations compared to DIN 1053‐1.     

Design tables for the utilisation factor α6,fi for the structural fire design of masonry according to DIN EN 1996‐1‐2/NA in the simplified calculation method

Easy‐to‐use verification equations are available for the verifications in the simplified calculation method. This applies also for the structural fire design of those masonry types for which a verification with the utilisation factor α_fi is given in the National Annex DIN EN 1996‐1‐2/NA. In specific applications, however, a classification can only be made applying the utilisation factor α_6,fi. In these cases, the verification for the structural fire design by calculation is considerably more complex than the mathematical verification of the structural design in the ”cold state“. The present paper shows how the design equation for α_6,fi can be made significantly easier with regard to its application by reference to the design value of the vertical load bearing resistance in the simplified method. Moreover, an upper limit value for the utilisation factor α_6,fi for the simplified method is summarised in tables.     

Design aids for unreinforced masonry under bending compression – Part 2: Application of design aids for structural design according to DIN EN 1996‐1‐1/NA

The semi‐probabilistic safety concept of divided safety factors for action and resistance of DIN EN 1990 [1] in combination with the structural design codes DIN EN 1996‐1‐1 [2] and DIN EN 1996‐1‐1/NA [3] include the requirement that acting normal forces N_Ed may not exceed the normal force resistances N_Rd for the structural design of masonry under bending compression. According to [3], fully plastic material behaviour can be assumed and the stress block used as the material law for masonry. Building on this, design aids and their theoretical basis were presented in Part 1 of this scientific paper [4], which are comparable with the ω tables (called the ? table here) and the general design diagram for massive construction. The application of the design aids is described in this second part of this scientific paper through calculation examples and the connection with the calculation approaches of [3] is made clear. The relation to the reduction factor ?_m, which covers effects of 2^nd order theory, is also obtained. With known values of the load eccentricities according to 1^st and 2^nd order theory, the design task becomes the analysis of the loadbearing capacity of the masonry section at half wall height. Knowing ?_m, the load eccentricity e₂ and the additional moment according to 2^nd order theory can subsequently be determined, which does not ensue from the calculation equations of [3]. With the general design diagram, the values of compression zone height and the assumed load eccentricities of the acting normal forces, which result from the reset rule for masonry sections with high load eccentricities, can be directly read off, greatly improving the clarity of this procedure.     

Spannungs‐Dehnungs‐Linien von Porenbeton bei hohen Temperaturen: ein erster Schritt zur versuchsbasierten Bemessung gemäß EN 1996‐1‐2

Stress‐strain curves of AAC at high temperatures: a first step toward the performance‐based design according to EN 1996‐1‐2 In this paper, the performance‐based approach for the design of autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) masonry walls subjected to fire is presented. The problems associated with the calculation methods in the current version of EN 1996‐1‐2 for the assessment of AAC loadbearing walls are explained. The current version of EN 1996‐1‐2 offers only tabulated data as a reliable method for structural fire assessment. The content of current Annex C and D is generally considered as not being reliable for design because of the absence of an adequate validation by experimental tests. For this reason, a proposal is made for the improvement of the input parameters for mechanical models based on experimental tests on AAC masonry. On this basis, new stress‐strain curves as a function of temperature are proposed here and then compared with the stress‐strain curves currently included in the Annex D of EN 1996‐1‐2. The comparison results point out that the current curves do not correspond to the effective behaviour of AAC masonry under fire conditions. The proposed curves can be used as base to be implemented in the new version of EN 1996‐1‐2.     

Practical application of a non‐linear earthquake analysis according to DIN EN 1998‐1 / Praktische Anwendung einer nichtlinearen Erdbebenanalyse nach DIN EN 1998‐1

Seismic safety verification can be performed by maintaining constructive rules or by calculation. Verification by calculation can be performed with a linear simplified or linear multi‐modal response spectrum analysis. Alternatively, a non‐linear quasi‐static verification is also possible according to DIN EN 1998‐1, which was not available in DIN 4149. In this article, the non‐linear quasi‐static earthquake verification according to DIN EN 1998‐1 is presented in practice, using the example of a building in Mittenwald/Germany. The verification has been checked and accepted by an independent building supervision report.     

Veneer walls of masonry as specified in EC 6 (DIN EN 1996‐2/NA) / Zweischaliges Mauerwerk nach EC 6 (DIN EN 1996‐2/NA)

This article deals with the production of veneer walls as specified in DIN EN 1996‐2/NA [3]. Against this background of the extensive revision of the section for veneer walls an exposition in accordance with the previous requirements as specified in DIN 1053‐1 can hardly be recommended. The necessity for a basic revision of the section for veneer wall construction has already been discussed in detail and justified in several technical articles published in previous years, see [4] to [7]. With many changes and corrections in the section for veneer walls in the National Annex of DIN EN 1996‐2 [8] it is certainly not a question of new rules for this method of building, but an adjustment of the requirements in the previous standard on the basis of the practical experience gained over several years. The new requirements for the execution of cavity facing masonry enable a simple and economic implementation of this external wall construction.     

Load‐bearing capacity of slender unreinforced masonry compression members under biaxial bending

Dedicated to Prof. Dr.‐Ing. Carl‐Alexander Graubner on the occasion of his 60th birthday Masonry members have to resist vertical loads and bending moments about the weak axis due to rotation of adjacent slabs. If the compression member is part of the bracing system, there are also bending moments about the strong axis. This paper deals with the load‐bearing capacity of biaxially eccentrically compressed unreinforced compression members with rectangular cross‐sections. For linear‐elastic material, the principles of an analytical model is presented, which considers geometrical and physical (cracking) non‐linearity. The deflections of the wall can be determined by using moment‐curvature relations, making possible the analytical analysis of compression members considering the effects of 2nd order theory. For a non‐linear stress‐strain relation, the calculation of the load carrying capacity of rectangular compression members under biaxial bending is complex and has to be determined numerically. The good accordance of the results of the analytical model with the numeric calculations is also shown for various eccentricities. In addition, a simplified proposal for the calculation of the load‐bearing capacity of biaxially eccentrically compressed unreinforced compression members is shown. The proposal is based on the load‐bearing capacity of uniaxially eccentrically compressed unreinforced compression members. Therefore it is possible to use the proposal considering existing models, for example according to Eurocode 2 or 6.     

Simplified design concept for slender masonry walls / Vereinfachter Stabilitätsnachweis knickgefährdeter Mauerwerkswände

The verification of safety against buckling of unreinforced masonry walls according to the accurate design procedure of EN 1996‐1‐1 Appendix G is based on semi‐empirical approaches, which do not always realistically describe the load‐bearing behaviour. This statement is also supported by an objection of the country Denmark concerning the load capacity function which is regulated in Appendix G. Using new findings about the effects of non‐linear material behaviour in case of stability failure this article investigates fundamental questions about the buckling behaviour of masonry walls and transfers these into a simple practical structural design proposal. As a result, the load capacity function can be considerably simplified, the influence of creep can be integrated and the number of input parameters can be reduced.     

Simplified verification method for unreinforced masonry shear walls

According to the German National Annex to DIN EN 1996‐3, a calculative verification of the bracing system may be omitted if, besides other requirements, an obviously sufficient number of sufficiently long shear walls is in place. If it is questionable whether a building complies with this requirement, a time‐consuming verification of the bracing system according to DIN EN 1996‐1‐1/NA is unavoidable. This article therefore presents a simplified verification method for the bracing system, which will prospectively be included in the next revision of DIN EN 1996‐3. The simplified bracing verification can already be used as a decision‐making aid to omit the calculative bracing verification according to DIN EN 1996‐1‐1/NA.     

Reinforced masonry beams under shear load – Proposals for future designs / Bewehrte schubbeanspruchte Mauerwerksbalken – Vorschläge für zukünftige Bemessungen

This article is written against the backdrop of the work of the European standardisation committees on the amendment of EN 1996‐1‐1 [N 4] which will also exert an influence on the design of reinforced masonry in Germany. This paper focusses on the design approaches of DIN EN 1996‐1‐1 for untensioned reinforced masonry beams under shear load in the ultimate limit state (ULS). Proposals are made to discuss their revision. The contents of E DIN 1053‐3 [N 3] and of the final draft of the guideline ”Flat Lintels” [7] are taken into account.