Accelerated fractionation in esophageal cancers: a multivariate analysis on 88 patients

PURPOSE: Accelerated fractionation was used to shorten overall treatment time to increase locoregional control and cause-specific survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighty-eight patients with cancer of the esophagus ineligible for surgery were entered in the study between 1986 and 1993. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was given to 64% of patients. Accelerated radiotherapy using the concomitant boost technique delivered a median dose of 65 Gy in a median overall treatment time of 32 days. RESULTS: The 3-year actuarial local control rate in patients with T1, T2, and T3 tumors was 71%, 42%, and 33%, respectively. The 3-year cause-specific survival rates were 40%, 22%, and 6%, respectively. Sixteen percent of patients experienced Grade 3 esophagitis. Late toxicity included esophageal stenosis and pulmonary fibrosis in 8% and 9% of the patients, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that T stage and overall treatment time were prognostic factors for cause-specific survival. T stage and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors for locoregional control. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that accelerated fractionation given in an overall treatment time of <35 days might be beneficial for early-stage cancer of the esophagus. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not recommended, as it was a significant adverse prognostic factor in the multivariate analysis for local control. Accelerated fractionation can be carried out with moderate acute and late toxicity.     

Effects of systemic and regional chemotherapy after hepatic resection for colorectal metastases

BACKGROUND: Although the survival benefit of hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis has been established, some controversy remains regarding the significance of adjuvant chemotherapy after hepatic resection. METHODS: One hundred thirty-two consecutive patients who had liver resection for colorectal metastasis at our hospital between 1980 and 1997 were studied. After curative hepatic resection, 37 patients underwent systemic chemotherapy, administered orally or intravenously, and 38 patients underwent regional chemotherapy, given intra-arterially or intraportally. Forty patients had no adjuvant chemotherapy. The chemotherapeutic agents used for oral administration were uracil and Tegafur or Tegafur alone. Mitomycin C (MMC) or 5-FU was used for IV chemotherapy. Combinations of 5-FU/leucovorin or MMC/5-FU (doxorubicin) were used for regional chemotherapy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to test the significance of adjuvant chemotherapy for patient survival or disease-free survival. RESULTS: Overall 5-year survival was 42.2% (95% CL: 31.2%, 53.2%). Among the possible prognostic factors studied, univariate analysis showed a significant difference in survival based on the number of tumors and lymph node metastases in the hepatic hilum. There was a significant difference in disease-free survival based on adjuvant chemotherapy and lymph node metastasis. The multivariate analysis for patient survival selected four prognostic factors (P < .05), including adjuvant chemotherapy, lymph node metastasis, disease-free interval, and tumor size. The multivariate analysis for disease-free survival selected adjuvant chemotherapy, lymph node metastasis, and disease-free interval as significant factors. The most common recurrence site was remnant liver, regardless of adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved survival and disease-free survival after hepatic resection for colorectal metastases. It did not decrease recurrence rate in the remnant liver.     

Differential spatio-temporal expression of the insulin-like growth factor genes in regenerating sciatic nerve

BACKGROUND: Prognosis following locoregional recurrence of breast cancer after mastectomy often is described as fatal. However, certain subgroups with better prognosis are supposed. We analysed established prognostic factors for their influence on post recurrence survival in order to discriminate favourable from unfavourable subgroups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1979 and 1989 163 patients with a local or regional recurrence of breast cancer following mastectomy were treated at the Department of Radiation Oncology of the University of Würzburg. One hundred and forty had an isolated recurrence, without evidence of distant disease at the time of recurrence. Median follow up for patients alive at the time of analysis was 102 months from diagnosis of recurrence. Thirteen prognostic factors were tested. RESULTS: Out of the 140 patients 94 (58%) developed distant metastases within the follow-up period. Metastatic-free rate was 42% at 5 years and 38% at 10 years following recurrence. Recurrences occurred in 50% of patients within the first 2 years from primary surgery, in 83% within 5 years. In univariate analysis statistically significant influence on survival rates was found for pT, pN-status, lymphatic vessel invasion, blood vessel invasion, tumor necrosis, hormonal receptor status, presence or development of distant metastases, time to recurrence and site and extension of recurrence. Two- and 5-year survival rates ranged from 64% to 81% and from 40% to 60%, respectively in the favourable subgroups compared to a survival rate ranging from 15% to 44% at 2 years and 0% to 29% at 5 years in the unfavourable subgroups. In patients with involved axillary lymph nodes, the absolute number of nodes did not prove to have significant influence on overall survival. Histopathological grading did not reach statistical significance levels although an influence on survival was observed. Preceding adjuvant radiotherapy did not influence post-recurrence survival rates. Also preceding adjuvant systemic therapy showed no significant impact on survival. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that primary axillary status correlated most strongly with overall survival (p < 0.001) followed by tumor necrosis (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The mentioned prognostic factors may be useful in determining the adequate (local and systemic) therapy and the best time for it. Our data support previous findings, that certain subgroups with favourable prognostic features exist and they might still have a chance for cure by an adequate local treatment, whereas subgroups of patients with unfavourable prognostic factors have to receive systemic therapy immediately following local therapy because of the forthcoming systemic progression.     

Carcinoma of the tonsillar fossa: prognostic factors and long-term therapy outcome

PURPOSE: To identify prognostic parameters and evaluate the therapeutic outcomes for patients with carcinoma of the tonsillar fossa treated with three treatment modalities. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The results of therapy are reported in 384 patients with histologically proven epidermoid carcinoma of the tonsillar fossa; 154 were treated with irradiation alone (55-70 Gy), 144 with preoperative radiation therapy (20-40 Gy), and 86 with postoperative irradiation (50-60 Gy). The operation in all but four patients in the last two groups consisted of an en bloc radical tonsillectomy with ipsilateral lymph node dissection. RESULTS: Treatment modality and total irradiation doses had no impact on survival. Actuarial 10-year disease-free survival rates were 65% for patients with T1 tumors, 60% for T2, 60% for T3, and 30% for T4 disease. Patients with no cervical lymphadenopathy or with a small metastatic lymph node (N1) had better disease-free survival (60% and 70%, respectively) at 5 years than those with large or fixed lymph nodes (30%). Primary tumor recurrence (local, marginal) rates in the T1, T2, and T3 groups were 20-25% in patients treated with irradiation and surgery and 31% for those treated with irradiation alone (difference not statistically significant). In patients with T4 disease treated with surgery and postoperative irradiation, the local failure rate was 32% compared with 86% with low-dose preoperative irradiation and 47% with irradiation alone (p = 0.03). The overall recurrence rates in the neck were 10% for N0 patients, 25% for N1 and N2, and 35-40% for patients with N3 cervical lymph nodes, without significant differences among the various treatment groups. The incidence of contralateral neck recurrences was 8% with the various treatment modalities. On multivariate analysis the only significant factors for local tumor control and disease-free survival were T and N stage (p = 0.04-0.001). Fatal complications were noted in 7 of 144 (5%) patients treated with preoperative irradiation and surgery, 2 of 86 (2%) of those receiving postoperative irradiation, and 2 of 154 (1.3%) patients treated with radiation therapy alone. Other moderate or severe nonfatal sequelae were noted in 30% of the patients treated with preoperative irradiation and surgery, in 53% treated with postoperative irradiation, and in 19% receiving radiation therapy alone. CONCLUSION: Primary tumor and neck node stage are the only significant prognostic factors influencing locoregional tumor control and disease-free survival. Treatment modality had no significant impact on outcome. Radiation therapy remains the treatment of choice for patients with stage T1-T2 carcinoma of the tonsillar fossa. In patients with T3-T4 tumors and good general condition, combination surgery and postoperative irradiation offers better tumor control than single-modality and preoperative irradiation procedures, but with greater morbidity.     

Sensitization of olfactory guanylyl cyclase to a specific imprinted odorant in coho salmon

PURPOSE: Local recurrence is a significant problem following primary surgery for advanced vulva carcinoma. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the impact of adjuvant vulvar radiation on local control in high risk patients and the impact of local recurrence on overall survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1980-1994, 62 patients with invasive vulva carcinoma and either positive or close (less 8 mm) margins of excision were retrospectively studied. Thirty-one patients were treated with adjuvant radiation therapy to the vulva and 31 patients were observed after surgery. Kaplan-Meier estimates and the Cox proportional hazard regression model were used to evaluate the effect of adjuvant radiation therapy on local recurrence and overall survival. Independent prognostic factors for local recurrence and survival were also assessed. RESULTS: Local recurrence occurred in 58% of observed patients and 16% in patients treated with adjuvant radiation therapy. Adjuvant radiation therapy significantly reduced local recurrence rates in both the close margin and positive margin groups (p = 0.036, p = 0.0048). On both univariate and multivariate analysis adjuvant radiation and margins of excision were significant prognostic predictors for local control. Significant determinants of actuarial survival included International Federation of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (FIGO) stage, percentage of pathologically positive inguinal nodes and margins of excision. The positive margin observed group had a significantly poorer actuarial 5 year survival than the other groups (p = 0.0016) and adjuvant radiation significantly improved survival for this group. The 2 year actuarial survival after developing local recurrence was 25%. Local recurrence was a significant predictor for death from vulva carcinoma (risk ratio 3.54). CONCLUSION: Local recurrence is a common occurrence in high risk patients. In this study adjuvant radiation therapy significantly reduced local recurrence rates and may improve overall survival in certain subgroups. As salvage rates after developing local recurrence are poor adjuvant vulvar radiation should be considered for patients at risk after primary surgery.     

Chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone for localized esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND: We performed a multi-institutional randomized trial comparing preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery with surgery alone for patients with local and operable esophageal cancer. METHODS: Preoperative chemotherapy for patients randomly assigned to the chemotherapy group included three cycles of cisplatin and fluorouracil. Surgery was performed two to four weeks after the completion of the third cycle; patients also received two additional cycles of chemotherapy after the operation. Patients randomly assigned to the immediate-surgery group underwent the same surgical procedure. The main end point was overall survival. RESULTS: Of the 440 eligible patients with adequate data , 213 were assigned to receive preoperative chemotherapy and 227 to undergo immediate surgery. After a median possible study time of 55.4 months, there were no significant differences between the two groups in median survival: 14.9 months for the patients who received preoperative chemotherapy and 16.1 months for those who underwent immediate surgery (P=0.53). At one year, the survival rate was 59 percent for those who received chemotherapy and 60 percent for those who had surgery alone; at two years, survival was 35 percent and 37 percent, respectively. The toxic effects of chemotherapy were tolerable, and the addition of chemotherapy did not appear to increase the morbidity or mortality associated with surgery. There were no differences in survival between patients with squamous-cell carcinoma and those with adenocarcinoma. Weight loss was a significant predictor of poor outcome (P=0.03). With the addition of chemotherapy, there was no change in the rate of recurrence at locoregional or distant sites. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative chemotherapy with a combination of cisplatin and fluorouracil did not improve overall survival among patients with epidermoid cancer or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.     

Combined-modality therapy for squamous carcinoma of the buccal mucosa: treatment results and prognostic factors

BACKGROUND: Reports on locoregional control and survival of squamous cell carcinoma of buccal mucosa are scarce in literature. In this study, a single institutions's experience of combined surgery and postoperative radiotherapy (RT) for buccal mucosal malignancy with favorable results was analyzed and presented. The prognostic factors on locoregional control were also discussed. METHODS: From January 1988 to July 1994, 57 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of buccal mucosa treated by surgery and RT were reviewed. The distributions according to American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging were: stage II, 6; stage III, 21; and stage IV, 30 patients. Total dose of RT at the buccal area ranged from 45 Gy to 68.4 Gy, median 61.2 Gy. Tumor-related factors (AJCC stage, T stage, histologic grading, pathologic tumor invasion to skin of cheek, adjacent bony structures, and regional lymph nodes) and treatment-related factors (surgical margin, radiation dose, and the time interval between operation and RT) were analyzed to determine their influence on locoregional control. RESULTS: Three-year actuarial locoregional control rate, overall survival rate, and disease-specific survival rates were 64%, 55%, and 62%, respectively. Ten of these 22 patients (45%) with recurrent tumors were reoperated, but only 2 patients were successfully salvaged. Positive surgical margin and tumor invasion to skin of cheek were significantly poor prognostic factors on locoregional control by univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, tumor invasion to skin of cheek was the only prognostic factor (p = .0014). CONCLUSIONS: Locoregional failure was the major cause of death for squamous buccal mucosa cancers managed with surgery and RT. Few recurrences could be detected early and successfully salvaged. Skin of cheek involvement is an important prognostic factor for buccal mucosa cancers.     

Malignant mesothelioma of the tunica vaginalis testis: review of the literature and assessment of prognostic parameters

BACKGROUND: Only 73 cases of malignant mesothelioma of the tunica vaginalis testis have been reported in the last 30 years. Although these tumors were most often seen in patients between ages 55 and 75 years, 10% of the patients were younger than 25 years. Because prognostic parameters have not yet been reported, the authors present another case of a male age 14 years and a review of the available literature, which they conducted to determine prognostic parameters. METHODS: The medical literature about malignant mesothelioma of the tunica vaginalis testis was reviewed. For the determination of prognostic parameters, a univariate and multivariate Cox regression model was used to assess the relevance of the patient's age, history of asbestos exposure, tumor histology, primary therapeutic approach, and presence of metastatic disease to survival. RESULTS: Previous exposure to asbestos or asbestos-containing materials must be considered a risk factor for the development of malignant mesothelioma. The major difficulty in managing patients with malignant mesothelioma of the tunica vaginalis testis was determining an accurate preoperative diagnosis, which was reported in only two cases. Due to the lack of characteristic symptoms, 97.3% of the cases were diagnosed intraoperatively. Of patients who underwent local resection of the hydrocele wall, 35.7% experienced local tumor recurrence, as compared with 10.5% after scrotal orchiectomy and 11.5% after inguinal orchiectomy. Therefore, radical orchiectomy should be the first-line therapy. The median survival of the patients was 23 months, which decreased to 14 months in cases of recurrence. The overall recurrence rate (local and disseminated) was 52.5%. More than 60% of recurrences developed within the first 2 years of the follow-up. In some cases of disseminated mesothelioma, adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy was given. Although reports on adjuvant treatments were limited, radiotherapy appeared to be more effective than chemotherapy. However, 37.9% died of disease progression. Assessment of prognostic parameters revealed a significant correlation of patient's age with survival (P < 0.01), with a better outcome for younger patients and a worse disease course for patients with primary disseminated disease (P < 0.05) in univariate analysis. A multivariate Cox regression model of prognostic parameters concerning survival did not yield statistically significant results. CONCLUSIONS: Malignant mesotheliomas of the tunica vaginalis testis rarely occur, but the possibility should be considered for all age groups. Univariate analysis determined that a patient's age and the presence of primary disseminated disease were prognostic parameters related to survival. Due to the invasive potential of this disease and the risk of tumor recurrence, radical orchiectomy and close follow-up are strongly recommended.     

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy of rectal carcinoma. The current status

BACKGROUND: The Consensus Conference of the German Cancer Society (CAO/AIO/ARO, 1.7.1998) has recently updated recommendations for patients with rectal cancer. Instead of a former reservation regarding the indication of adjuvant therapy for rectal cancer the actual version of the consensus particularly emphasizes the role of postoperative radiochemotherapy for stage-II/III tumors. This article reviews the most recent and ongoing trials of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy of rectal cancer. RESULTS: To avoid local recurrence is the most important aspect in the primary treatment of rectal cancer. In some series, e.g. the results of the Surgical Department of the University of Erlangen, a significant correlation between local control and survival was noted. The final results of the Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial with 1168 randomized patients not only confirmed the potential of radiotherapy to reduce local recurrence rate, but also demonstrated a significant survival advantage for patients receiving short-course preoperative radiation therapy. Postoperative combination therapy is usual in the United States and in most European countries since the publication of two randomized trials of the Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group (GITSG) and the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG). The survival advantage resulting from an adjuvant radiotherapy with conventional doses and concurrent fluorouracil-based chemotherapy as compared to surgery alone was recently confirmed in a Norwegian trial. Protracted venous 5-fluorouracil infusion should further improve treatment results. Numerous phase-II studies have demonstrated the efficacy of preoperative radiochemotherapy with high rates of pathological response. Thus, neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy is recommended for patients with locally advanced tumor primarily not amenable to curative surgery. Prospective randomized trials are ongoing to clarify the role of preoperative versus postoperative combined treatment for patients with resectable rectal cancer. CONCLUSION: Radiochemotherapy for rectal cancer is recommended as standard treatment outside clinical trials for stage II/III patients after curative treatment and for patients with T4-tumor prior to surgery. The optimal use of chemotherapy and the sequence of treatment modalities remains to be elucidated.     

Immunocytochemical markers in stage I lung cancer: relevance to prognosis

PURPOSE: This study investigated the frequency of the expression and prognostic significance of a panel of immunocytochemical markers in resected non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 515 cases of pathologic stage I NSCLC were analyzed. The median follow-up time of surviving patients was 102 months. The following immunocytochemical markers were tested: blood group A and precursors of blood antigens; laminin receptor; c-erbB1/epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and c-erbB2/Neu; BCl2; p53; and angiogenesis. Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival and time to recurrence were calculated for clinical variables and biologic markers using the Cox model for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The pathologic tumor extension (pT) represented the most powerful prognostic factor for survival (P = .0008) and time to recurrence (P = .0007). None of the immunocytochemical markers emerged as an independent predictive factor for survival. Bcl2-positive tumors showed a better time to recurrence (P = .03), but the difference lost statistical significance in the multivariate analysis. Of interest, in the group of 137 patients classified as pT1N0, both EGFR expression and nonangiogenic type of vascular pattern were associated with a poorer survival (P = .02). However, data derived from subset analysis must be interpreted cautiously. CONCLUSION: Our findings do not support a relevant prognostic role of immunocytochemical markers in NSCLC. The evidence is not sufficient to alter clinical practice or even to restrict clinical trials of adjuvant treatments to predefined biologic subsets of patients.     

Adjuvant therapies in extended pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The poor prognosis after pancreatic cancer resection is attributed to a high incidence of locoregional recurrence and hepatic metastasis. The present study was carried out in order to determine whether adjuvant therapies improve patient survival. METHODOLOGY: Preoperative irradiation and postoperative liver perfusion chemotherapy have been added to the extended pancreatectomy procedure, and a retrospective analysis of 111 patients was performed. RESULTS: Preoperative irradiation (n = 17) significantly decreased the incidence of locoregional recurrence but increased the incidence of hepatic metastasis, with no improvement in the 5-year survival rate (from 27% to 23%). In contrast, postoperative liver perfusion chemotherapy (n = 27) succeeded in improving the 5-year survival rate to 39% by significantly decreasing the incidence of hepatic metastasis. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that the patients' survival rate may be increased when these two types of adjuvant therapy are combined with extended pancreatectomy.     

Induction chemotherapy is associated with an increase in the incidence of locoregional recurrence in patients with carcinoma of the oral cavity: results from a single institution

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to determine long term survival rates and the pattern of failure in patients with carcinoma of the oral cavity treated with induction chemotherapy or preoperative radiotherapy followed by surgery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of 141 eligible patients with Stage II-IV International Union Against Cancer (UICC) staging system squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity at the study department between 1985 and 1994. These patients received one of three treatments: surgery with or without peplomycin chemotherapy (Group A; n = 49); preoperative radiotherapy with or without concomitant peplomycin chemotherapy followed by surgery (Group B; n = 59); and induction chemotherapy followed by surgery (Group C; n = 33). Induction chemotherapy was comprised of two cycles of cisplatin, vincristine, peplomycin, with or without mitomycin C. RESULTS: When all 141 patients were analyzed, there was no significant difference in overall survival or disease free survival. However, a statistically significant increase in the incidence of neck recurrence in Group C was observed compared with Group A (P = 0.002). Within 79 patients with N0 disease, a statistically significant disadvantage was detected for Group C in terms of disease free survival compared with Group A (P = 0.038). In patients with Stage II disease (50 patients), there was a significant difference in disease free survival, with Group C inferior to both Group A (P = 0.04) and Group B (P = 0.066). CONCLUSIONS: Induction chemotherapy was associated with a significant increase in regional failure for patients with carcinoma of the oral cavity with N0 disease and those with Stage II disease.     

Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy and hormonal therapy. Effect on local recurrence in the conservatively treated breast cancer patient

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy and adjuvant hormonal therapy on local relapse in the conservatively treated breast. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Before December 1989, 548 patients underwent lumpectomy with axillary dissection followed by radiation therapy to the intact breast. Adjuvant systemic therapy was administered as clinically indicated. The majority of patients with pathologically involved lymph nodes received adjuvant systemic therapy, whereas those with pathologically negative lymph nodes received no adjuvant systemic therapy. The majority of patients received a course of radiation therapy either concomitant with or before systemic therapy. In only nine cases was radiation therapy delayed more than 16 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: As of June 1992, the 548 patients had a median follow-up of 6.4 years. In univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis, patient age and adjuvant systemic chemotherapy were statistically significant independent prognostic factors relating to breast relapse. Those patients who received adjuvant systemic chemotherapy had a lower breast relapse than those who did not. Among patients who received tamoxifen, there was a statistically insignificant trend toward a lower relapse rate compared with those who did not receive tamoxifen. CONCLUSIONS: It appears from this retrospective analysis that patients who received adjuvant systemic therapy, either concomitantly or after their course of radiation therapy, had a lower relapse rate in the conservatively treated breast than those patients who received no adjuvant systemic therapy.     

Na+/H+ exchanger (NHE) in the basolateral membrane is encoded by NHE-1 mRNA in LLC-PK1 clone 4 cells

Clinical follow-up data of 276 colorectal adenocarcinoma patients treated in Kuopio University Hospital between 1976 and 1986 and followed up for a mean of 14 years were analysed. The clinical findings were correlated with tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and with histological and quantitative factors including nuclear parameters and volume-corrected mitotic index. In univariate survival analysis, TNM classification, Dukes' stage, histological grade, and TILs were significant predictors of survival. TNM classification, Dukes' stage, and TILs also predicted recurrence-free survival. In multivariate analysis, TILs were an independent prognostic factor of survival in all cases, as well as in patients with T1-4N0-3M0 and T1-4N1-3M1. TILs also independently predicted recurrence-free survival. TILs can provide important prognostic information in colorectal cancer to be used in evaluating for adjuvant therapy in different tumour stages.     

The importance of the lumpectomy surgical margin status in long-term results of breast conservation

BACKGROUND: The impact of the surgical margin status on long-term local control rates for breast cancer in women treated with lumpectomy and radiation therapy is unclear. METHODS: The records of 289 women with 303 invasive breast cancers who were treated with lumpectomy and radiation therapy from 1972 to 1992 were reviewed. The surgical margin was classified as positive (transecting the inked margin), close (less than or equal to 2 mm from the margin), negative, or indeterminate, based on the initial biopsy findings and reexcision specimens, as appropriate. Various clinical and pathologic factors were analyzed as potential prognostic factors for local recurrence in addition to the margin status, including T classification, N classification, age, histologic features, and use of adjuvant therapy. The mean follow-up was 6.25 years. RESULTS: The actuarial probability of freedom from local recurrence for the entire group of patients at 5 and 10 years was 94% and 87%, respectively. The actuarial probability of local control at 10 years was 98% for those patients with negative surgical margins versus 82% for all others (P = 0.007). The local control rate at 10 years was 97% for patients who underwent reexcision and 84% for those who did not. Reexcision appears to convey a local control benefit for those patients with close, indeterminate, or positive initial margins, when negative final margins are attained (P = 0.0001). Final margin status was the most significant determinant of local recurrence rates in univariate analysis. By multivariate analysis, the final margin status and use of adjuvant chemotherapy were significant prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: The attainment of negative surgical margins, initially or at the time of reexcision, is the most significant predictor of local control after breast-conserving treatment with lumpectomy and radiation therapy.     

Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy for stage II or IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer after complete resection. Provincial Lung Cancer Disease Site Group

GUIDELINE QUESTIONS: 1) Does the use of postoperative, adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy, alone or in combination, improve survival rates among patients with completely resected, pathologically confirmed stage II or IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)? 2) Does the use of radiotherapy reduce the risk of local recurrence among patients with completely resected stage II or IIIA NSCLC? OBJECTIVE: To make recommendations about the use of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with completely resected stage II or IIIA NSCLC. OUTCOMES: Overall survival and disease-free survival are the primary outcomes of interest. A secondary outcome of interest is local disease control. PERSPECTIVES (VALUES): Evidence was collected and reviewed by 4 members of the Lung Cancer Disease Site Group (Lung Cancer DSG) of the Cancer Care Ontario Practice Guidelines Initiative. The evidence-based recommendation resulting from this review was approved by the Lung Cancer DSG, which comprises medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, pathologists, surgeons and a medical sociologist. A community representative was present at 1 meeting during which the recommendation was discussed. QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: One meta-analysis and 22 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were published between 1962 and 1996. The RCTs compared surgery plus radiotherapy with surgery alone; surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy with surgery alone; surgery plus radiotherapy with surgery plus both chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Many studies included patients with stage IIIB NSCLC; some included patients with incompletely resected stage I NSCLC or with small cell lung cancer (maximum 10%). Older studies used chemotherapy or radiation that would now be considered inferior according to current standards of practice. BENEFITS: There was no survival benefit with adjuvant radiotherapy alone, although 3 RCTs reported a reduction in the rate of local recurrence among patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy. The meta-analysis showed that postoperative, cisplatin-based chemotherapy alone reduced the relative risk of death by 13% (hazard ratio [HR] 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74 to 1.02); in combination with radiotherapy it resulted in a 6% reduction in the relative risk of death (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.11). HARMS: Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with alkylating agents was found in the meta-analysis to increase the relative risk of death by 15%. A study involving prolonged adjuvant chemotherapy (busulfan or cytoxan daily for 2 years) reported that 4 of 726 patients had hematologic malignancies. In 1 study, only 53% of patients received all 4 cycles of chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-cisplatin (CAP); in another, 22% of patients refused therapy with CAP because of nausea and vomiting. PRACTICE GUIDELINE: There is evidence from RCTs that postoperative radiotherapy reduces rates of local recurrence by 11% to 18% (or 1.6 to 19-fold) among patients with completely resected, pathologically confirmed stage II or IIIA NSCLC. Therefore, if the outcome of interest is a reduction in the frequency of local tumour recurrence, radiotherapy is recommended. However, there is no evidence of a survival benefit from postoperative radiotherapy alone. In a meta-analysis, postoperative chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy resulted in a slightly reduced (statistically nonsignificant) risk of death among patients with surgically resected stage II or IIIA NSCLC. The survival benefit was small and achieved only with chemotherapy regimens that produced substantial toxic effects and that are no longer used. Newer chemotherapy regimens are currently being evaluated as adjuvant therapy, but there is insufficient evidence of benefit at this time to recommend them. Therefore, if the outcome of interest is survival, there is insufficient evidence to recommend current chemotherapy regimens with or without radiotherapy as postoperative, adjuvant the     

Adjuvant medical therapy for colorectal cancer

In the mid-1980s, trials of adjuvant therapy for colon cancer in the United States had a "no treatment" arm, which reflected the belief that effective adjuvant chemotherapy did not exist for patients with surgically resected disease at high risk for recurrence. However, with the observation in the early 1990s that postsurgical adjuvant 5-FU plus levamisole reduced tumor recurrence and ultimately increased overall survival in stage III colon cancer, the potential of effective adjuvant chemotherapy was realized. Questions about the duration of adjuvant chemotherapy, the specifics of chemotherapy schedule/drug selection, and its use in stage II colon cancer are beginning to be clarified in large, randomized adjuvant therapy trials. In rectal carcinomas, combined modality postoperative pelvic irradiation plus chemotherapy for stage II and III disease has been shown to reduce both local and systemic recurrences and to prolong survival compared with that in patients treated with local surgery and radiation. Again, large randomized trials are attempting to clarify both the optimal chemotherapeutic agents and schedules to be used and also whether preoperative combined modality therapy can improve the resectability rate, rate of sphincter preservation, and survival. Future trials will examine new agents shown to be effective in advanced disease as well as monoclonal antibodies, such as MoAb 17-1A, that may have selective activity in minimal disease. Improvement in overall survival remains the ultimate endpoint of future adjuvant therapy trials; however, trials will also critically examine toxicity, quality of life, pharmacoeconomics, and genetic and biologic correlates that may help select more appropriate candidates for adjuvant therapies.     

Extracapsular axillary node extension in patients receiving adjuvant systemic therapy: an indication for radiotherapy?

PURPOSE: This is a retrospective review into the patterns of failure of 82 patients with Stage II or III breast cancer who had extracapsular extension (ECE) of axillary nodal metastases and who received systemic chemotherapy or hormonal therapy without loco-regional radiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The clinical records of patients with axillary node positive (T1-T3, N1, 2) Stage II or III breast cancer seen at the London Regional Cancer Centre between 1980-1989 were reviewed. Patients were identified who underwent segmental mastectomy with axillary node dissection or modified radical mastectomy and received adjuvant chemotherapy or tamoxifen but did not undergo loco-regional radiation. Eighty-two patients within this group had pathologic evidence of extracapsular axillary node extension (ECE). For 45 of these patients the extension was extensive, and for the remaining 37 it was microscopic. This ECE-positive group was compared to a subgroup of 172 patients who did not have pathologic evidence of extracapsular axillary node extension but had metastatic carcinoma confined within the nodal capsule. RESULTS: Median age of the 82 ECE-positive patients was 56 years. Twenty-five patients had had a segmental mastectomy, the remainder a modified radical mastectomy. Median actuarial survival was 60 months, with a median disease-free and loco-regional failure-free survival of 38 months. Seventy-eight percent of these patients developed a recurrence, which was loco-regional in 60% (21% local, 21% regional, 2% local and regional, and 16% loco-regional and metastatic). There was a 36% recurrence rate in intact breast, 14% the chest wall following modified radical mastectomy, 7% relapsed in the axilla, 12% in supraclavicular nodes, and 1% in the internal mammary nodes. A comparison of the 82 ECE-positive patients with a group of 172 ECE-negative patients determined that there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of survival (overall and disease-free) and loco-regional recurrence. Univariate analysis of the entire 254 node-positive patient group revealed extracapsular nodal extension (ECE) to be a prognostically significant factor for actuarial and disease-free survival as well as for loco-regional failure, but ECE did not remain an independently prognostic factor after multivariate analysis. Segmental mastectomy, positive resection margins, and ER negative status increased the risk of loco-regional recurrence within the ECE-positive group. CONCLUSIONS: Extracapsular axillary node extension is a prognostically significant factor for actuarial survival, disease-free survival, and loco-regional failure but not independent of other adverse prognostic factors. It is a marker for increased loco-regional recurrence associated with doubling of breast, chest wall, and supraclavicular recurrence rates. The risk of axillary relapse in patients who have had an adequate level I and II axillary dissection but demonstrate extracapsular extension is low (7%). We recommend breast/chest wall and supraclavicular radiation for all patients with pathologic evidence of such extranodal extension who have had a level I and II axillary dissection regardless of the number of positive axillary nodes. Axillary irradiation should be considered for patients who have had only an axillary sampling or level I axillary dissection.     

pⅢA/N2期非小细胞肺癌患者外科治疗的预后分析

Objective: The aim of the study was to identify prognostic factors in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with N2nodal involvement. Methods: A retrospective analysis of disease free survival and 5-year survival for NSCLC patients who underwent primary surgical resection without neoadjuvant chemotherapy were performed. Between January 1998 and May 2004, 133 patients were enrolled. Several factors such as age, sex, skip metastasis, number of N2 lymph node stations, type of resection, histology, adjuvant therapy etc., were recorded and analyzed. SPSS 16.0 software was used. Results: Overall 5-year survival for 133 patients was 32.33%, 5-year survival for single N2 station and multiple N2 stations sub-groups were 39.62% and 27.50% respectively, and 5-year survival for cN0-1 and cN2 sub-groups were 37.78% and 20.93% respectively.COX regression analysis revealed that number of N2 station (P= 0.013, OR: 0.490, 95% Cl: 0.427-0.781) and cN status (P =0.009, OR: 0.607, 95% Cl: 0.372-0.992) were two favorable prognostic factors of survival. Conclusion: Number of N2 station and cN status were two favorable prognostic factors of survival. In restrict enrolled circumstances, after combined therapy made up of surgery and postoperative adjuvant therapy have been performed, satisfied survival could be achieved.     

Survival and functional status after resection of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme

OBJECTIVE: To determine the selection factors for and results of second resections performed to treat recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GM), we studied 301 patients with GM who were treated from the time of diagnosis using two prospective clinical protocols. METHODS: The patients were prospectively followed from the time of diagnosis, using clinical and radiographic criteria after maximal surgical resection and external beam radiotherapy with or without adjuvant chemotherapy. Resection of recurrent GM was performed at the recommendation of the treating clinicians. The results of the second resections were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed using multivariate logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier-Turnbull survival analysis, Cox regression, and propensity score stratification. RESULTS: Forty-six patients underwent second resections during the study period. The actuarial rate of the second resections was 15% of the patients 1 year after diagnosis and 31% 2 years after diagnosis. Younger age (P = 0.01) and more extensive initial resection (P = 0.02), but not Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score at the time of diagnosis or recurrence, predicted a higher chance of selection for reoperation after initial tumor recurrence. Twenty-eight percent of the patients had improved KPS scores after undergoing reoperation, 49% were stable, and 23% had declines in KPS scores of 10 to 30 points. There was no operative mortality. After reoperation, 85% of the patients received chemotherapy, 11% received brachytherapy or underwent stereotactic radiosurgery, and 17% underwent third resections. The median survival period after reoperation was 36 weeks. Higher preoperative KPS scores predicted longer survival periods after reoperation (P = 0.03). Age and interval since diagnosis were not significant prognostic factors. The median high-quality survival period (KPS score, > or =70) was 18 weeks. The median survival period after first tumor progression was 23 weeks for 130 patients treated using the same protocols who did not undergo reoperations. Patients who did undergo reoperations experienced clinically and statistically significantly longer survival periods. However, this was determined to be partially because of selection bias. CONCLUSION: Survival after resection of recurrent GM remains poor despite advances in imaging, operative technique, and adjuvant therapies. High-quality survival after resection of recurrence to treat GM seems to have increased significantly since an earlier report from our institution.