Omeprazole 10 milligrams once daily, omeprazole 20 milligrams once daily, or ranitidine 150 milligrams twice daily, evaluated as initial therapy for the relief of symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in general practice

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of omeprazole, 20 mg once daily, in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis and the therapeutic advantages over the histamine H2 receptor antagonists are well documented. This study assessed 20 mg omeprazole daily (OM20), 10 mg omeprazole daily (OM10), and 150 mg ranitidine (RAN) twice daily for symptom relief in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). METHODS: Patients (n = 994) presenting with heartburn to their general practitioner underwent endoscopy to exclude peptic ulcer disease and were randomized into a UK, multicentre, parallel-group, double-blind comparison of the three treatments for 4 weeks. Symptoms were assessed at clinic visits after 2 and 4 weeks. RESULTS: Symptom relief after 4 weeks was achieved by 61% (OM20), 49% (OM10), and 40% (RAN) patients (OM20 versus OM10, P < 0.0167; OM20 versus RAN, P < 0.0001; OM10 versus RAN, P < 0.01). Among the patients (32%) with erosive reflux oesophagitis, symptom relief was achieved in 79% (OM20), 48% (OM10), and 33% (RAN) (OM20 versus OM10, P < 0.0001; OM20 versus RAN, P < 0.0001; OM1O versus RAN, NS). CONCLUSION: Omeprazole, 20 mg, is the most effective initial therapy for relief of GORD symptoms.     

Treating the symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a double-blind comparison of omeprazole and cisapride

BACKGROUND: Few studies have specifically addressed the management of the symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, and there are no comparative data in this respect for acid pump inhibitors and prokinetic agents. METHODS: Following endoscopy 424 patients presenting with heartburn as the predominant symptom of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease were randomized to treatment with omeprazole 20 or 10 mg once daily, or cisapride 10 mg four times daily, in a double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group, multicentre study. Symptoms and quality of life were assessed at 4 weeks. Patients still experiencing heartburn continued therapy for a further 4 weeks and the assessments were repeated. RESULTS: At 4 weeks, heartburn was resolved in 65% (95% CI: 57-73%), 56% (48-64%) and 41% (32%-49%) of patients treated, respectively, with omeprazole 20 mg and 10 mg once daily, and cisapride. Both omeprazole doses were significantly more effective than cisapride (P < 0.01). The same order of efficacy was observed regardless of the presence of erosive oesophagitis. Regurgitation and epigastric pain also improved to a greater degree with omeprazole than with cisapride. Quality of life was improved in all treatment groups, and the improvement in the reflux dimension of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) score was significantly different between groups (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Omeprazole 20 or 10 mg once daily is significantly more effective than cisapride in the resolution of heartburn, regardless of the presence of erosive oesophagitis, and this is accompanied by an improvement in patient quality of life.     

Lifetime costs of surgical versus medical treatment of severe gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in Finland

BACKGROUND: Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) can be effectively treated pharmacologically or surgically. As GERD is often a chronic condition, we compared the long-term costs of medical and surgical management. METHODS: The medical regimens were ranitidine (150 or 300 mg/day), omeprazole (20 or 40 mg/day), and lansoprazole (30 mg/day), with costs calculated for total life expectancy after diagnosis and for one-third of that time. Costs for open or laparoscopic surgery (Nissen fundoplication) included pre- and post-operative investigations, sick leave, and calculated financial loss due to fatal outcome. RESULTS: Costs were lowest with ranitidine, 150 mg/day, for one-third of the patient's lifetime and highest with lifelong omeprazole, 40 mg/daily. The cost of open or laparoscopic operation was less than that of lifelong daily treatment with proton pump inhibitors or ranitidine, 300 mg daily. CONCLUSION: In Finland, antireflux surgery for GERD is cheaper than lifetime treatment with proton pump inhibitors.     

Effect of omeprazole 40 mg once daily on intraduodenal and intragastric pH in H. pylori-negative healthy subjects

There is a lack of information about the effect of omeprazole or other antisecretory drugs on intraduodenal pH. Aim of the study was to document the variation over time of intraduodenal pH during a 24-hr period and to simultaneously study the effect of omeprazole 40 mg once daily on intragastric and intraduodenal pH in healthy H. pylori-negative subjects. In a randomized, placebo-controlled study, eight subjects (five women, three men, mean age 22.7 years) received oral 40 mg omeprazole or placebo once daily for eight days. On day 7, intragastric and intraduodenal pH was measured continuously for 24 hr, using two miniature glass-membrane electrodes placed in the stomach (fundus) and in the distal third of the duodenum. The 24-hr median intraduodenal pH was 5.95 with placebo and 5.85 with omeprazole. Median intragastric pH was 1.68 without and 4.93 with omeprazole. During omeprazole therapy, intragastric pH fell below 4.0 in five of eight subjects. In the 2- and 3-hr postprandial periods, the percentage of time with pH < 5 was significantly reduced with omeprazole. In healthy subjects, 24-hr median and postprandial pH in the distal part of the duodenum was lower than previously thought. Omeprazole significantly reduced the percentage of time with pH < 5 postprandially. At night, intragastric pH fell below 4.0 with omeprazole 40 mg once daily. Omeprazole does not change 24-hr median intraduodenal pH significantly.     

No effects of high-dose omeprazole in patients with severe airway hyperresponsiveness and (a)symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux

Uptake of inhaled anesthetics may be measured as the amount of anesthetic infused to maintain a constant alveolar concentration of anesthetic. This method assumes that the patient absorbs all of the infused anesthetic, and that none is lost to circuit components. Using a standard anesthetic circuit with a 3-L rebreathing bag simulating the lungs, and simulating metabolism by input of carbon dioxide, we tested this assumption for halothane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane. Our results suggest that after washin of anesthetic sufficient to eliminate a material difference between inspired and end-tidal anesthetic, washin to other parts of the circuit (probably the ventilator) and absorbent (soda lime) continued to remove anesthetic for up to 15 min. From 30 min to 180 min of anesthetic administration, circuit components absorbed trivial amounts of isoflurane (12 +/- 13 mL vapor at 1.5 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration, slightly more sevoflurane (39 +/- 15 mL), and still more halothane (64 +/- 9 mL). During this time, absorbent degraded sevoflurane (321 +/- 31 mL absorbed by circuit components and degraded by soda lime). The amount degraded increased with increasing input of carbon dioxide (e.g., the 321 +/- 31 mL increased to 508 +/- 48 mL when carbon dioxide input increased from 250 mL/min to 500 mL/min). Measurement of anesthetic uptake as a function of the amount of anesthetic infused must account for these findings. Implications: Systems that deliver inhaled anesthetics may also remove the anesthetic. Initially, anesthetics may diffuse into delivery components and the interstices of material used to absorb carbon dioxide. Later, absorbents may degrade some anesthetics (e.g., sevoflurane). Such losses may compromise measurements of anesthetic uptake.     

Ceftriaxone once daily for four weeks compared with ceftriaxone plus gentamicin once daily for two weeks for treatment of endocarditis due to penicillin-susceptible streptococci. Endocarditis Treatment Consortium Group

This randomized, multicenter, open-label study compared the efficacy and safety of monotherapy with 2 g of intravenous ceftriaxone once daily for 4 weeks with those of combination therapy with 2 g of intravenous ceftriaxone and 3 mg of intravenous gentamicin/kg once daily for 2 weeks as therapy for endocarditis due to penicillin-susceptible streptococci. Sixty-one patients were enrolled in the study. Clinical cure was observed for 51 evaluable patients both at termination of therapy and at the 3-month follow-up: 25 (96.2%) of 26 monotherapy recipients and 24 (96%) of 25 combination therapy recipients. Of the 23 patients in each treatment group who were microbiologically evaluable, 22 (95.7%) in each group were considered cured. No patient had evidence of relapse. Fourteen patients (27.5%) required cardiac surgery after initiation of treatment, including five monotherapy recipients and nine combination therapy recipients. Adverse effects were minimal in both treatment groups. We conclude that 2 g of ceftriaxone once daily for 4 weeks and 2 g of ceftriaxone in combination with 3 mg of gentamicin/kg once daily for 2 weeks are both effective and safe for the treatment of streptococcal endocarditis.     

Motor function of the proximal stomach and visceral perception in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Oxytocin (OT) is present in the mammalian testis and has been shown to play a role in the modulation of seminiferous tubule contractility and steroidogenesis. However, stage-specific effects of the peptide have not been previously investigated. In this study, computer-assisted analysis and time-lapse videomicrography were used to investigate basal contractility and the response to OT of seminiferous tubules at specific stages of the spermatogenic cycle. Adult rat testes were placed in fresh oxygenated DMEM F12 medium, decapsulated, and the tubules gently teased apart. Stages were identified by transillumination and a 10 mm section of tubule at each of stages IV-V, VII-VIII and XIII-I was placed in a microslide chamber and perifused with medium. After a control period of 3 h, OT (2 nM) was given for 1 h, followed by another control period of 1 h. The experiment was repeated using tubules from different rats and data were analysed to give arbitrary units of tubule contractility. Contractility was observed in all the tubules studied and the contractile activity was shown to vary depending on the stage of the spermatogenic cycle. Mean basal contractility at stages VII-VIII, the time when sperm are shed from the epithelium, was significantly lower than that at stages IV-V and XIII-I. The response of the tubules to OT was also stage-dependent, with the peptide producing the largest increases in contractile activity at stages VII-VIII and having no effect at stages IV-V. We postulate that these stage-specific differences in basal and OT-stimulated contractility may be important in co-ordinating the movement of developing germ cells towards the lumen of the seminiferous epithelium and in the process of spermiation.     

The end of antibiotic treatment in adults with acute sinusitis-like complaints in general practice? A placebo-controlled double-blind randomized doxycycline trial

BACKGROUND: Acute sinusitis-like complaints are very common and are usually treated with antibiotics in spite of the lack of evidence for the effectiveness of antibiotic therapy and the increasing number of resistant strains. AIM: To assess the effectiveness of doxycycline in adults with acute sinusitis-like complaints in general practice. METHOD: The effects of doxycycline in a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial were assessed in adults consulting their general practitioner (GP) with complaints after a common cold or influenza, pain in the head when bending forward, purulent nasal discharge, predominantly unilateral maxillary pain, toothache, or pain when chewing. Primary outcome events were the resolution of facial pain and the resumption of daily activities. Treatment differences were assessed by means of Kaplan-Meier curves and hazard ratios. The follow-up period was 42 days. RESULTS: No significant difference was found in time to recover between the doxycycline-treated group and the placebo-treated group. However, the adjusted hazard ratio for the group receiving doxycycline was 1.17 (95% CI = 0.87-1.57) for the resolution of pain and 1.31 (95% CI = 0.96-1.78) for the resumption of daily activities. After 10 days, 85% of all patients reported improvement and 60% were completely cured. Side effects were reported by 17% of the doxycycline-treated group, with two patients withdrawing because of side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Data from this study indicate that doxycycline does not add to the effectiveness of decongestive nose drops and steam inhalation in treating acute sinusitis-like complaints in general practice adults.     

Ranitidine effervescent and famotidine wafer in the relief of episodic symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Radioligands that specifically target dopamine uptake sites can provide a means of determining dopamine fiber loss at intrastriatal mesencephalic grafts in Parkinsonian patients, using Positron Emission Tomography (PET). The BTCP derivative, 1-[1-(2-benzo(b)thiophenyl)cyclohexyl]-4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-piperazine, shows in vitro high affinity and selectivity for the dopamine transporter. To evaluate the potential of such a compound as a potential dopaminergic PET tracer the positron-emitting analogues, 1-[1-(2-benzo(b)thiophenyl)cyclohexyl]-4-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-piperazine and 1-[1-(2-benzo(b)thiophenyl)cyclohexyl]-4-[11C]methylpiperazine, were synthesized. Radiofluorination was carried out by the reaction of 1-[1-(2-benzo(b)thiophenyl)cyclohexyl]-4-(2-chloroethyl)-piperazine with cyclotron-produced n.c.a. 18F-(half life 109.9 min) obtained by the (p,n) reaction on 18O-enriched water. Labelling with carbon-11 (half life 20.4 min) was achieved by 11C methylation of 1-[1-(2-benzo(b)thiophenyl)cyclohexyl]-piperazine with [11C]methyl iodide. After intravenous administration to rats these two compounds enter the brain, but despite their high in vitro affinity they display a high non specific binding in vivo which greatly limits their use as PET radioligands.     

Continuous treatment with omeprazole 20 mg daily for up to 6 years in Barrett''s oesophagus

There has been no in vivo validation of the use of transthoracic echocardiography to measure distal left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) diameter. We therefore undertook transthoracic echocardiography on 65 male patients immediately before cardiac catheterization to compare echocardiographic and angiographic findings. The distal LAD was successfully imaged in 41 (63%) patients; 29 of these had an angiographically normal distal LAD as assessed by an independent cardiologist and formed the study group. Transthoracic echocardiographic and quantitative coronary angiographic measurements of distal LAD diameter were made. Echocardiographic measurements ranged from 0.14 to 0.28 cm (mean 0.20 cm). Angiographic results ranged from 0.12 to 0.28 cm (mean 0.195 cm). Correlation between techniques was good (r=.925). The maximum discrepancy between transthoracic echocardiography and quantitative coronary angiography was 0.03 cm. Limits of agreement were +0.032 to -0.024 cm. We conclude that transthoracic echocardiography is a valid technique for measurement of distal LAD diameter.     

Effects of oral rabeprazole on oesophageal and gastric pH in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND: This study examined the dose-response effects of the new proton-pump inhibitor rabeprazole on oesophageal and gastric pH in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. METHODS: This study had a single-centre, double-blind, randomized, two-way crossover design. Twenty patients were treated for two 7-day periods separated by a 7-10-day washout period. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 20 mg of rabeprazole once daily during the first treatment period and 40 mg once daily during the second treatment period, or 40 mg during the first treatment period and 20 mg during the second treatment period. The primary efficacy variable was oesophageal acid exposure determined by 24-hour ambulatory pH monitoring. Acid-reflux time was defined as the percentage of time over 24 h that oesophageal pH was < 4. A dosage was considered effective if reflux time was reduced to < 6%, a number which has been our internal laboratory reference. RESULTS: Both rabeprazole 20 mg and 40 mg, given once daily, normalized reflux time, with decreases of 79% and 92% in acid exposure by day 7. Both dosages also decreased the mean total number of reflux episodes and the number of episodes lasting > 5 min, with no significant differences between dosages for any reflux parameter. Mean gastric pH increased with 20 mg from 1.86 at baseline to 3.71 on day 1 and 4.17 on day 7. Rabeprazole 40 mg once daily increased gastric pH from 2.01 to 4.37 on day 1, and to 4.65 on day 7. Safety analyses revealed no significant acute side-effects for either dosage. CONCLUSIONS: Pathological oesophageal acid exposure was normalized with both 20 mg and 40 mg dosages of rabeprazole, and the effects of these two doses did not differ. Rabeprazole was well-tolerated in this short-term study.     

Comparison of ceftibuten once daily and amoxicillin-clavulanate three times daily in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

In medical practice, antibiotics are generally given empirically for the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). To be effective, antibiotic therapy should be broad in spectrum, and it should also cover the common beta-lactamase-producing pathogens. In this multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked study, 469 patients with AECB were randomized (in a ratio of 2:1) to receive 400-mg oral ceftibuten capsules once daily or 500-mg amoxicillin-clavulanate tablets three times daily for 5 to 15 days. Patients receiving ceftibuten were further divided into those who took the capsule with a meal (fed) and those who took the capsule 1 hour before a meal (fasted). Clinical and microbiologic responses were evaluated after treatment at 0 to 6 days (end of treatment) and 7 to 21 days (follow-up). Overall clinical success was determined by cure/improvement of signs and symptoms of AECB at the end of treatment and at follow-up. Overall microbiologic assessment was graded as eradication, persistence, relapse, reinfection, colonization, superinfection, or unassessable. Tolerability was evaluated by grading observed adverse events. The mean duration of treatment was 10.4 days for patients who received ceftibuten and 10.1 days for patients who received amoxicillin-clavulanate. A total of 252 patients receiving ceftibuten and 117 patients receiving amoxicillin-clavulanate were evaluable for clinical efficacy, and 55 patients were evaluable for microbiologic response. Both treatments improved the signs and symptoms of bronchitis, and overall clinical success rates were equivalent for patients treated with ceftibuten (211 of 252 [84%]) and amoxicillin-clavulanate (93 of 117 [79%]) (95% confidence interval [CI], -4.5% to 13.6%). Overall microbiologic eradication rates were also similar for patients treated with ceftibuten (36 of 37 [97%]) and amoxicillin-clavulanate (12 of 14 [86%]) (95% CI, -5.2% to 21.2%). The most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events were gastrointestinal disturbances, which occurred in 15% (47 of 316) and 24% (36 of 152) of patients treated with ceftibuten and amoxicillin-clavulanate, respectively. No significant difference was observed in the ceftibutenfed and ceftibuten-fasted groups in overall clinical assessments of the clinical efficacy population and safety population. In conclusion, 400 mg oral ceftibuten once daily has a similar clinical success rate to 500 mg amoxicillin-clavulanate three times daily, with a trend toward fewer gastrointestinal side effects, in the treatment of patients with AECB.     

Comparison of the effect of lansoprazole and omeprazole on intragastric acidity and gastroesophageal reflux in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

A prospective study of the pharmacokinetics of itraconazole solution was performed in 11 patients who underwent allogeneic BMT (day of BMT = day 0) after a conditioning regimen including total body irradiation (TBI). Itraconazole solution (400 mg once a day) was given 7 days before BMT and continued up to the end of neutropenia unless another antifungal treatment was necessary. Blood samples were collected before itraconazole intake (Cmin) and 4 h later (Cmax) every other day for assays of itraconazole (ITRA) and its active metabolite hydroxy-itraconazole (OH-ITRA). The mean values of Cmin ITRA and OH-ITRA, respectively, were 287 +/- 109 ng/ml and 629 +/- 227 ng/ml at day -1 and 378 +/- 147 ng/ml and 725 +/- 242 ng/ml at day +1. The maximum Cmin values were observed at day +3. Six patients at day -1 (54%) and 8 at day +1 (72%) had satisfactory residual plasma concentrations of at least 250 ng/ml of unchanged ITRA. From day +1 to day +9, eight patients discontinued the itraconazole treatment, five of them had satisfactory plasma residual concentrations at this time. This work shows a good bioavailability of itraconazole oral solution during the early phase after allogeneic BMT, but more data are needed for the late phases.     

Omeprazole. A review of its use in Helicobacter pylori infection, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and peptic ulcers induced by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Omeprazole is a well studied proton pump inhibitor that reduces gastric acid secretion. This review examines its use in Helicobacter pylori infection, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) with or without oesophagitis and gastrointestinal damage caused by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Optimal omeprazole regimens for anti-H. pylori therapy are those that administer the drug at a dosage of 40 mg/day (in 1 or 2 divided doses) for 7, 10 or 14 days in combination with 2 antibacterial agents. As a component of 3-drug regimens in direct comparative studies, omeprazole was at least as effective as lansoprazole, pantoprazole, bismuth compounds and ranitidine. However, a meta-analysis suggests that triple therapies with omeprazole are more effective than comparable regimens containing ranitidine, lansoprazole or bismuth. Omeprazole also appears to be successful in triple therapy regimens used in children with H. pylori infection. In patients with acute GORD with oesophagitis, omeprazole is at least as effective as lansoprazole or pantoprazole in promoting healing, and superior to ranitidine, cimetidine or cisapride in oesophagitis healing and symptom relief. Omeprazole was similar to lansoprazole and superior to ranitidine in preventing oesophagitis relapse in patients with all grades of oesophagitis, but may be superior to lansoprazole or pantoprazole in patients with more severe disease. More patients with symptomatic GORD without oesophagitis experienced symptom relief after short term treatment with omeprazole than with ranitidine, cisapride or placebo, and symptoms were more readily prevented by omeprazole than by cimetidine or placebo. Omeprazole was effective in healing and relieving symptoms of reflux oesophagitis in children with oesophagitis refractory to histamine H2 receptor antagonists. Omeprazole is superior to placebo in preventing NSAID-induced gastrointestinal damage in patients who must continue to take NSAIDs. It is also similar to misoprostol and superior to ranitidine in its ability to heal NSAID-induced peptic ulcers and erosions, and superior to misoprostol, ranitidine or placebo in its ability to prevent relapse. In long and short term studies, omeprazole was well tolerated, with diarrhoea, headache, dizziness, flatulence, abdominal pain and constipation being the most commonly reported adverse events. Usual omeprazole dosages, alone or combined with other agents, are 10 to 40 mg/day for adults and 10 to 20 mg/day for children. CONCLUSIONS: Omeprazole is a well studied and well tolerated agent effective in adults or children as a component in regimens aimed at eradicating H. pylori infections or as monotherapy in the treatment and prophylaxis of GORD with or without oesophagitis or NSAID-induced gastrointestinal damage.