The totally miscible in ternary hydrogen‐bonded polymer blend of poly(vinyl phenol)/phenoxy/phenolic

The individual binary polymer blends of phenolic/phenoxy, phenolic/poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh), and phenoxy/PVPh have specific interaction through intermolecular hydrogen bonding of hydroxyl–hydroxyl group to form homogeneous miscible phase. In addition, the miscibility and hydrogen bonding behaviors of ternary hydrogen bond blends of phenolic/phenoxy/PVPh were investigated by using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and optical microscopy. According to the DSC analysis, every composition of the ternary blend shows single glass transition temperature (T_g), indicating that this ternary hydrogen‐bonded blend is totally miscible. The interassociation equilibrium constant between each binary blend was calculated from the appropriate model compounds. The interassociation equilibrium constant (K_A) of each individually binary blend is higher than any self‐association equilibrium constant (K_B), resulting in the hydroxyl group tending to form interassociation hydrogen bond. Photographs of optical microscopy show this ternary blend possess lower critical solution temperature (LCST) phase diagram. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Miscibility and phase behavior of poly(D,L-lactide)/poly(p-vinylphenol) blends

The miscibility of poly(D ,L -lactide) (PDLLA) and poly(p-vinylphenol) (PVPh) blends has been studied by differential scanning calorimetry and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Phase separation was observed in blends over a wide composition range. A PDLLA-rich phase was found to coexist with an almost pure PVPh phase. The quenched blend samples showed two glass transitions (T_gs), except for a blend with a low PVPh content. However, the T_g value of the PDLLA-rich phase showed a gradual increase with increasing PVPh content. No evidence of interassociation (hydrogen bond formation) between PDLLA and PVPh was found by FTIR. The phase behavior of the blends was simulated using an association model. The results suggested that the equilibrium constant of interassociation between PDLLA and PVPh was small. The phase compositions of the two separated phases were calculated using Fox, Gordon-Taylor, and Couchman equations. The amount of PVPh in the PDLLA-rich phase increased with increasing PVPh content in the blend. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 70: 811–816, 1998     

Phase behavior of hydrogen‐bonded ternary polymer blends

Although poly(ethyl methacrylate) (PEMA) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) are only slightly different in structure, they are known to be immiscible. Polystyrene is not miscible with PEMA or PMMA. However, when polystyrene is modified to contain certain vinyl phenol groups to become poly(styrene‐co‐vinyl phenol) (PSVPh), it can be miscible with both PEMA and PMMA. What is the miscibility of a ternary blend consisting of PEMA, PMMA, and PSVPh? For this question to be answered, binary blends of PEMA (or PMMA) were first made with PSVPh. Their miscibility was examined. Then, ternary blends composed of PEMA, PMMA, and PSVPh were prepared and measured calorimetrically. The role of PSVPh between PEMA and PMMA and the effect of different contents of vinyl phenol groups on the miscibility of the ternary blends were investigated. On the basis of experimental results, increasing the vinyl phenol contents of PSVPh seemed to have an adverse effect on the miscibility of the ternary blends. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 89: 2088–2094, 2003     

Miscibility enhancement on the immiscible poly (vinyl pyrrolidone) and poly (ethyl methacrylate) with poly (vinyl phenol)

The miscibility behavior of ternary blends of poly (vinyl phenol) (PVPh)/poly (vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP)/poly (ethyl methacrylate) (PEMA) was investigated mainly with calorimetry. PVPh is miscible with both PVP and PEMA on the basis of the single T_g observed over the entire composition range. FTIR was used to study the hydrogen bonding interaction between the hydroxyl group of PVPh and the carbonyl group of PVP and PEMA at various compositions. Furthermore, the addition of PVPh is able to enhance the miscibility of the immiscible PVP/PEMA and eventually transforms it into a miscible blend, especially when the ratio between PVP/PEMA is 3:1, probably because of favorable physical interaction. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 1205–1213, 2006     

Miscibility enhancement through hydrogen bonding interaction of biodegradable poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate) blending with poly(styrene‐co‐vinyl phenol) copolymer

Differential scanning calorimetry, one‐ and two‐dimensional Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), and solid state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy have been used to investigate the miscibility of and specific interactions between poly(styrene‐co‐vinyl phenol) (PSOH) and poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) upon varying the vinyl phenol content of the PSOH copolymer. The FTIR and solid state NMR spectra revealed that the phenol units of PVPh interact with the carbonyl groups of PHB through intermolecular hydrogen bonding. A miscibility window exists when the vinyl phenol fraction in the copolymer is greater than 22 mol % in the PSOH/PHB blend system, as predicted using the Painter–Coleman association model. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Miscible blends containing bacterial poly(3‐hydroxyvalerate) and poly(p‐vinyl phenol)

The miscibility of poly(3‐hydroxyvalerate) (PHV)/poly(p‐vinyl phenol) (PVPh) blends has been studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The blends are miscible as shown by the existence of a single glass transition temperature (T_g) and a depression of the equilibrium melting temperature of PHV in each blend. The interaction parameter was found to be −1.2 based on the analysis of melting point depression data using the Nishi–Wang equation. Hydrogen‐bonding interactions exist between the carbonyl groups of PHV and the hydroxyl groups of PVPh as evidenced by FTIR spectra. The crystallization of PHV is significantly hindered by the addition of PVPh. The addition of 50 wt % PVPh can totally prevent PHV from cold crystallization. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 74: 383–388, 1999     

Binary and ternary polymer blends containing poly(vinylidene chloride‐co‐acrylonitrile)

Poly(vinylidene chloride‐co‐acrylonitrile) (Saran F), poly(hydroxy ether of bisphenol A) (phenoxy), poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (PSAN), and poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) all have the same characteristic: miscibility with atactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (aPMMA). However, the miscibility of Saran F with the other polymer (phenoxy, PSAN, or PVPh) is not guaranteed and was thus investigated. Saran F was found to be miscible only with PSAN but not miscible with phenoxy and PVPh. Because Saran F and PVPh are not miscible, although they are both miscible with aPMMA, aPMMA can thus be used as a potential cosolvent to homogenize PVPh/Saran F. The second part of this report focused on the miscibility of a ternary blend consisting of Saran F, PVPh, and aPMMA to investigate the cosolvent effect of aPMMA. Factors affecting the miscibility were studied. The established phase diagram indicated that the ternary blends with high PVPh/Saran F weight ratio were found to be mostly immiscible. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 91: 3068–3073, 2004     

Miscible blends of poly(4‐vinyl phenol)/poly (trimethylene terephthalate)

A new miscible blend of all compositions comprising poly(4‐vinyl phenol) (PVPh) and poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) was discovered and reported. The blends exhibit a single composition‐dependent glass transition and homogeneous phase morphology, with no lower critical solution temperature (LCST) behavior upon heating to high temperatures. Interactions and spherulite growth kinetics in the blends were also investigated. The Flory–Huggins interaction parameter (χ₁₂) and interaction energy density (B) obtained from analysis of melting point depression are negative (χ₁₂ = ?0.74 and B = ?32.49 J cm^?3), proving that the PVPh/PTT blends are miscible over a wide temperature range from ambient up to high temperatures in the melt state. FTIR studies showed evidence of hydrogen‐bonding interactions between the two polymers. The miscibility of PVPh with PTT also resulted in a reduction in spherulite growth rate of PTT in the miscible blend. The Lauritzen–Hoffman model was used to analyze the spherulite growth kinetics, which showed a lower fold‐surface free energy (σ_e) of the blends than that of the neat PTT. The decrease in the fold‐surface free energy has been attributed to disruption of the PTT lamellae exerted by PVPh in an intimately interacted miscible state. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry     

Miscibility and carbon dioxide transport properties of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (iPHB) and its blends with different copolymers of styrene and vinyl phenol

This work summarizes the miscibility and transport properties of different polymer blends obtained by mixing a bacterial, isotactic poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (iPHB) with copolymers of styrene and vinyl phenol (Sty-co-VPh copolymers). Given that iPHB and pure commodity poly(styrene) (PS) form immiscible blends, PS has been modified by copolymerizing it with vinyl phenol (VPh) units, in an attempt to promote blend miscibility. VPh units have appropriate functional groups that interact with iPHB ester moieties. The potential miscibility was investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measuring the glass transition temperatures of blends of different compositions. As an additional test, the interaction parameter between the two components, using the iPHB melting point depression caused by the second component, was also measured. Copolymers containing less than 90% styrene showed miscibility with iPHB.Given the remarkable barrier properties of iPHB to gases and vapours, the study has been completed by measuring transport properties of carbon dioxide through different iPHB/Sty-co-VPh copolymer blends, using gravimetric sorptions in a Cahn electrobalance. A clear difference was observed between the behaviour of rubbery blends and those that exhibit a glassy behaviour at the selected experimental temperature (303 K).     

Effect of thermal treatments on the miscibility of poly(vinyl cinnamate) binary blends

Poly(vinyl cinnamate) (PVCN) could undergo thermal or photo crosslinking. PVCN was previously found to be miscible with poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) [also named poly(hydroxystyrene)]. In this article, the miscibility between PVCN with or without thermal crosslinking and poly(styrene‐co‐hydrostyrene) (designated as MPS) was investigated. PVCN was determined to be miscible with MPS with 15% of hydroxystyrene (MPS‐15) at two compositions but partially miscible or immiscible at PVCN/MPS‐15(50/50) composition. For MPS with 5% of hydroxystyrene (MPS‐5), two T_g values were detected indicating mostly immiscibility. However, PVCN after thermal crosslinking was determined to be miscible with both MPS‐5 and MPS‐15. Immiscibility was found between thermally crosslinked PVCN and PVPh different from miscibility in the original PVCN/PVPh blends. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Decreasing miscibility with greater heterogeneity in ternary polymer blend: poly(cyclohexyl methacrylate), poly(α‐methyl styrene) and poly(4‐methyl styrene)

A ternary blend system comprising poly(cyclohexyl methacrylate) (PCHMA), poly(α‐methyl styrene) (PαMS) and poly(4‐methyl styrene) (P4MS) was investigated by thermal analysis, optical and scanning electron microscopy. Ternary phase behaviour was compared with the behaviour for the three constituent binary pairs. This study showed that the ternary blends of PCHMA/PαMS/P4MS in most compositions were miscible, with an apparent glass transition temperature (T_g) and distinct cloud‐point transitions, which were located at lower temperatures than their binary counterparts. However, in a closed‐loop range of compositions roughly near the centre of the triangular phase diagram, some ternary blends displayed phase separation with heterogeneity domains of about 1 µm. Therefore, it is properly concluded that ternary PCHMA/PαMS/P4M is partially miscible with a small closed‐loop immisciblity range, even though all the constituent binary pairs are fully miscible. Thermodynamic backgrounds leading to decreased miscibility and greater heterogeneity in a ternary polymer system in comparison with the binary counterparts are discussed. © 2003 Society of Chemical Industry     

Reexamination of the miscibility of stereoregular poly(methyl methacrylate) with poly(vinyl phenol)

Previously, isotactic, atactic, and syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylates) (PMMAs) (designated as iPMMA, aPMMA, and sPMMA) were mixed with poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) separately in tetrahydrofuran (THF) to make three polymer blend systems. According to calorimetry data, iPMMA was found to be miscible with PVPh; however, partial miscibility or immiscibility was found between aPMMA (or sPMMA) and PVPh. According to the article by C. J. T. Landry and D. M. Teegarden, Macromolecules, 1991, 24, 4310, THF is the reason for causing aPMMA and PVPh to phase separate, but 2‐butanone instead produces miscible blends. Therefore, in this article these three polymer systems were investigated again using 2‐butanone as solvent. Films were prepared under specific conditions to minimize the effect of aggregation in PMMA. The formation of hydrogen bonding between PMMA and PVPh and the attendant changes in the aggregation of PMMA segments were determined in the solid states by means of FTIR. Based on the results of calorimetry, iPMMA and aPMMA were found to be miscible with PVPh. For iPMMA/PVPh blends, different degrees of hydrogen bonding were observed based on DSC data and FTIR spectra when compared to previous study. An elevation of the glass transition temperatures (T_gs) of aPMMA/PVPh blends above weight average was detected and the T_g values were fitted well by the Kwei equation. But partial miscibility was still found between sPMMA and PVPh on account of the observation of two T_gs in most compositions. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 83: 1425–1431, 2002     

Effect of copolymer compositions on the miscibility behavior and specific interactions of poly(styrene-co-vinyl phenol)/poly(vinyl phenyl ketone) blends

Differential scanning calorimetry and one- and two-dimensional Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopies have been used to investigate the miscibility of and specific interactions between poly(styrene-co-vinyl phenol) (PSOH) and poly(vinyl phenyl ketone) (PVPK) upon varying the vinyl phenol content of the PSOH copolymer. The FTIR spectra revealed that the phenol units of PVPh interact strongly with the CO groups of PVPK through intermolecular hydrogen bonding, and more weakly with the aromatic rings of PVPK through intermolecular π-π interactions. A miscibility window exists when the vinyl phenol fraction in the copolymer is greater than 20 mol% in the PSOH/PVPK blend system, as predicted using the Painter-Coleman association model.     

Poly(butylene succinate)/poly(vinyl phenol) blends. Part 1. Miscibility and crystallization

Miscibility has been investigated in blends of poly(butylene succinate) (PBSU) and poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) by differential scanning calorimetry in this work. PBSU is miscible with PVPh as shown by the existence of single composition dependent glass transition temperature over the entire composition range. In addition, the polymer–polymer interaction parameter, obtained from the melting depression of PBSU using the Nishi–Wang equation, is composition dependent, and its value is always negative. This indicates that PBSU/PVPh blends are thermodynamically miscible in the melt. Preliminary morphology study of PBSU/PVPh blends was also studied by optical microscopy (OM). OM experiments show the spherulites of PBSU become larger with the PVPh content, indicative of a decrease in the nucleation density, and the coarseness of PBSU spherulites increases too with increasing the PVPh content in the blends.     

Influence of tacticity of poly(methyl methacrylate) on the compatibility with poly(vinyl phenol)

Isotactic, atactic, and syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) were mixed with poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) separately in tetrahydrofuran to make three polymer blend systems. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy were used to study the miscibility of these blends. Isotactic PMMA was found to be more miscible with PVPh than atactic or syndiotactic PMMA. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 66: 1773–1780, 1997     

Miscibility and crystallization of biodegradable poly(butylene succinate-co-butylene adipate)/poly(vinyl phenol) blends

Miscibility, crystallization kinetics, crystal structure, and microstructure of biodegradable poly(butylene succinate-co-butylene adipate) (PBSA)/poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) blends were studied by differential scanning calorimetry, optical microscopy, wide angle X-ray diffraction, and small angle X-ray scattering in detail in this work. PBSA and PVPh are miscible as evidenced by the single composition dependent glass transition temperature and the negative polymer-polymer interaction parameter. Isothermal crystallization kinetics of PBSA/PVPh blends was investigated and analyzed by the Avrami equation. The overall crystallization rates of PBSA decrease with increasing crystallization temperature and the PVPh content in the PBSA/PVPh blends; however, the crystallization mechanism of PBSA does not change in the blends. Furthermore, blending with PVPh does not modify the crystal structure of PBSA. The microstructural parameters, including the long period, thickness of crystalline phase and thickness of amorphous phase, all become larger with increasing the PVPh content, indicating that PVPh mainly resides in the interlamellar region of PBSA spherulites in the blends.     

Miscibility with positive deviation in Tg-composition relationship in blends of poly(2-vinyl pyridine)-block-poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(p-vinyl phenol)

Phase behavior and miscibility with positive deviation from linear T_g-composition relationship in a copolymer/homopolymer blend system, poly(2-vinyl pyridine)-block-poly(ethylene oxide) (P2VP-b-PEO)/poly(p-vinyl phenol) (PVPh), were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and solid-state ¹³C nuclear magnetic resonance (¹³C NMR), optical microscopy (OM), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Optical and electron microscopy results as well as NMR proton spin-lattice relaxation times in laboratory frame () all confirmed the miscibility as judged by the T_g criterion using DSC. In comparison to the literature result on a homopolymer/homopolymer blend of P2VP/PVPh, fitting with the Kwei equation on the T_g-composition relationship for the block-copolymer/homopolymer blend of P2VP-b-PEO/PVPh blend system yielded a smaller q value (q = 120) for P2VP-b-PEO/PVPh than that for P2VP/PVPh blend (q = 160). The FT-IR and ¹³C NMR results revealed hydrogen-bonding interactions between the pendant pyridine group of P2VP-b-PEO and phenol unit in PVPh, which is responsible for the noted positive deviation of the T_g-composition relationship. Comparison of the shifts of hydroxyl IR absorbance band, reflecting the average strength of H-bonding, indicates a decreasing order of P2VP/PVPh > P2VP-b-PEO/PVPh > PEO/PVPh blends. The PEO block in the copolymer segment tends to defray the interaction strength in the P2VP-b-PEO/PVPh blends because of relative weaker interaction between PEO and PVPh than that between P2VP and PVPh pairs. A comparative ternary (P2VP/PEO)/PVPh blend was also studied as the controlling experiments for comparison to the P2VP-b-PEO/PVPh blend. The thermal behavior and interaction strength in (P2VP/PEO)/PVPh ternary blends are discussed with those in the P2VP-b-PEO/PVPh copolymer/homopolymer blend.     

Miscibility and crystallization of biodegradable poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyhexanoate)/poly(vinyl phenol) blends

Miscibility and crystallization of biodegradable poly (3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyhexanoate) (PHBHHx)/poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) blends were investigated in this work. PHBHHx is miscible with PVPh over the whole composition range as evidenced by the single composition dependent glass transition temperature and the depression of equilibrium melting point of PHBHHx in the blends. The overall crystallization rates decrease with increasing crystallization temperature for both neat PHBHHx and its blends with PVPh; moreover, the overall crystallization rates are slower in the PHBHHx/PVPh blends than in neat PHBHHx at the same crystallization temperature. Blending with PVPh may change the crystallization mechanism of PHBHHx in the blends compared with that of neat PHBHHx. Both neat PHBHHx and the PHBHHx/PVPh blends exhibit a crystallization regime II to III transition. The crystal structure of PHBHHx is not modified in the PHBHHx/PVPh blends; however, the values of crystal layer thickness, amorphous layer thickness, and long period all become larger with increasing PVPh content in the blends. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2012. © 2011 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Towards the simulation of poly(vinyl phenol)/poly(vinyl methyl ether) blends by atomistic molecular modelling

Molecular simulations of poly(vinyl phenol)/poly(vinyl methyl ether) (PVPh/PVME) blends were performed and their degree of miscibility evaluated as a preliminary step before orientation simulations. A minimum of three periodic boundary condition amorphous models was constructed and analysed in terms of solubility parameter, X-ray pattern, pair correlation function, hydrogen bond fraction and backbone conformation. The values obtained are consistent with miscibility of the systems, although it is suggested that the degree of mixing is not uniform for the different models.     

Molecular dynamics modelling for the analysis and prediction of miscibility in polylactide/polyvinilphenol blends

This paper analyzes the miscibility state of Poly(L-Lactide) (PLLA) and Poly(DL-Lactide) (PDLLA) with Poly(styrene) (PS) and Poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) by means of Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations performed using the COMPASS force-field. Immiscibility was found in polylactide/PS blends while miscibility was the result in polylactide/PVPh blends, both previsions agreeing with the experimental behaviour. The values calculated for the Flory-Huggins interaction parameter, χ, have been compared with the experimental results and with estimations based on existing miscibility models. Even though the dependence of χ with composition and the prediction of miscibility is correct, both the solubility parameters and the interaction parameters obtained prove that molecular modelling tends to underestimate the strength of the interactions. The observed differences are explained in terms of the absence of cooperativity effects for oligomeric chains used in molecular modelling of high molecular weight polymer blends.