Management of instrumental perforations of the esophagus occurring during treatment of corrosive strictures

BACKGROUND: The initial symptoms of esophageal perforations (EP) may be subtle, but the progression is very rapid, and the outcome may be disastrous unless the diagnosis is made early and proper treatment is started immediately. METHODS: Between 1976 and 1996, 1,249 patients with caustic esophageal burns were treated at Ege University. The study group is composed of 52 patients with instrumental ER Perforations occured during dilatation attempts of esophageal strictures. Twelve patients were referred from other institutions after the occurrence of EP. RESULTS: In two patients, emergency surgical repair of the perforation was possible. Seventeen patients with unilateral and two patients with bilateral empyema were treated by pleural drainages. Anterior retrosternal mediastinal drainage was needed in one patient, and 11 patients required posterior mediastinal drainages. Three patients were treated by both anterior and posterior mediastinal drainage. Tracheoesophageal fistulas (TEF) developed in eight patients immediately after a dilatation attempt. Seven of these patients required esophageal replacement with colon to bypass the fistulas, and one patient in this group healed spontaneously. EP healed in 42.5 +/- 49.4 days. Twelve (23%) patients died of mediastinitis and sepsis. CONCLUSION: When EP is diagnosed and treated with these methods, the mortality rate should approach zero.     

Esophageal perforation: emphasis on management

BACKGROUND: Perforation of the esophagus is a deadly injury that requires expert management for survival. METHODS: We performed a retrospective clinical review of 66 patients treated at Emory University affiliated hospitals for esophageal perforation between 1973 and 1993. RESULTS: Iatrogenic perforations accounted for 48 injuries (73%), barogenic perforations occurred in 12 patients (17%), trauma was causative in 3 (5%), and 3 patients had esophageal infection and other causes. Lower-third injuries occurred in 43 cases (65%), middle third in 14 (21%), and upper third in 9 (14%). Early contained perforations were managed successfully by limiting oral intake and giving parenteral antibiotics in 12 patients. Cervical perforations were drained without attempt at closure of the leak. Perforations with mediastinal or pleural contamination recognized early were managed by primary closure and drainage in 28 patients. Reinforcement of the primary closure using stomach fundus, pleural, diaphragmatic, or pericardial flap was performed in 16 patients. Those perforations that escaped early recognition required thoughtful management, using generous debridement and drainage and sometimes esophageal resection. The esophageal T tube provided control of leaks in 3 of these patients and was a useful adjunct. Using these management principles, we achieved a 76% survival rate for all patients. Six patients with perforations complicating endoesophageal management of esophageal varices were a high-risk subset with an 83% mortality rate. CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal perforation remains an important thoracic emergency. Aggressive operative therapy remains the mainstay for treatment; however, conservative management may be preferred for contained perforations and the esophageal T tube may be used for late perforations.     

Peripheral nerve changes in thiamine deficiency and starvation. An electron microscopic study

The treatment of iatrogenic esophageal perforation is still today subject of discussion. The present work relates our experience on 16 cases seen between 1955 and 1976, and compares the results with the 1,310 collected by French and English literature. The etiology of perforation is: endoscopy (50.5%), dilatation (19.5%), foreign bodies (14%), surgery and other causes (16%). The mortality rate of cervical perforations is 14.5% (7.3% with medical treatment, 18% with drainage, 12.6% with suture). In the thoracic esophagus it is 32.5% (50% with medical treatment, 40% with drainage, 18% with suture). The data demonstrate that the best results are obtained with surgical treatment, that may be simple drainage when the perforation is cervical, but must be the suture in the thoracic esophagus. We must emphasize that the operation must be performed within 24 hours, because, in the cases operated on after 24 hours, the mortality rate is nearly double.     

CYP2D6 genotype and smoking behaviour in cigarette smokers

BACKGROUND: Esophageal perforation is one of the most dreaded complications in therapeutic gastrointestinal endoscopy. We assessed the frequency of esophageal perforation after endoscopic procedures in a highly specialized endoscopy unit and compared clinical outcomes in patients undergoing either surgical or conservative management. METHODS: From January 1985 to June 1996, 1011 instrumental endoscopic procedures (dilatation and bougienage) were performed in our department. The computerized complication database was searched to identify all patients with esophageal perforation during this same period, and their records were reviewed. RESULTS: Seventeen esophageal perforations (1.7%) occurred in the course of 1011 procedures. Four perforations resulted from balloon dilatation, and 13 were secondary to bougienage. Six patients were managed surgically (35%), all of them recovering uneventfully. Eleven patients were managed conservatively, mainly because they were unfit for surgery. Survival rate in this group was 82%; only two patients died, both of whom had underlying malignant disease. CONCLUSIONS: The current concept in management of esophageal perforations comprises surgical as well as medical treatment. In well-selected cases, non-operative treatment can be considered with favorable results.     

Iatrogenic esophageal injuries and their treatment

In our Department 22 patients were treated due to esophagus perforations in the years 1990-1996. Most of them (16) occurred after endoscopic examinations: diagnostic-3, after strictures dilatation-10, endoscopic intubation-2, sclerotherapy-1, transesophageal cardioversion-1. There were 5 intraoperative perforations: 3-after cardiomyotomy, 2-after intubation. The following treatment was performed: oesophageal suture and drainage-5 patients, subtotal oesophagectomy with oesophagogastrostomy-3 patients, oesophagectomy with salivary fistula and oesophago-gastro or -colostomy in second operation--9 patients, perforation covered with gastric fundus--3, intubation--1 patient, conservative treatment--1 patient. Four (18%) patient died.     

Nonoperative management of esophageal perforations. Is it justified?

OBJECTIVE: Experiences obtained with nonoperative treatment (NOT), i.e. total prohibition of per oral food intake for a minimum of 7 days, administration of combinations of broad-spectrum antibiotics, and parenteral hyperalimentation, are described in the management of esophageal perforations. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The place, value, and indication of NOT in the management of esophageal perforation has not yet been unequivocally defined. As a result, contradictory data have been published regarding the outcome of NOT. METHODS: During the past 15 years (1979 to 1994), 20 of 86 patients (23.3%) with esophageal perforation have been treated nonoperatively from the outset. In this group, perforations were located to the upper, middle, and lower third of the esophagus in 50%, 30%, and 20%, respectively. In the operative management group (OT)--in which conservative (drainage, endeprothesis), reconstructive (suture, reinforced suture), and radical (resection) surgical methods were applied--lesions were preponderantly located in the lower one third of the esophagus (56.1%--37/66). As to the interval between the perforation and the onset of treatment, 14 patients had been diagnosed within 24 hours, whereas in 6 cases treatment had been begun beyond 24 hours. RESULTS: NOT could be successfully carried out in 16 patients; the decision to use NOT had to be revised in 4 other cases (Table 1). Two patients were lost; the mortality rate was 10% (2 of 20). The rate of complications was lower in the NOT group (20%, or 4 of 20) than in the OT group (50%, or 33 of 66). CONCLUSIONS: NOT can be suggested for the treatment of intramural perforations. In the case of transmural perforation, this approach should be taken into consideration if the esophageal lesion is circumscribed, is not in neoplastic tissue, is not in the abdominal cavity, and is not accompanied by simultaneous obstructive esophageal disease; in addition, symptoms and signs of septicemia should be absent.     

Surgical treatment of intraoperative injuries and cicatricial strictures of extrahepatic bile ducts

The analysis of 70 cases of surgical treatment for intraoperative injuries and cicatricial strictures of extrahepatic bile ducts was carried out. In 25 patients surgical procedure was restorative and in 45--reconstructiver. Most common causes of corrective operations were: iatrogenic injuries of extrahepatic bile ducts (14) and cicatricial strictures of hepaticocholedochal duct due to intraoperative trauma (31). The problems of operative technique in performing biliobilio-, hepato-hepatico and hepatico-jejuno-anastomoses are considered. There were three deaths in the early postoperative period: 2 patients died of hepatic failure, pyogenic cholangiogenic intoxication caused by cholangioectasies and intrahepatic abscesses, and 1-due to generalyzed peritonitis caused by acute gastric ulcer perforation. Special attention is paid to the choice of the method of prolonged drainage used in reconstructive as well as in restorative operations.     

Purification and characterization of a cytotoxin from Enterobacter cloacae

OBJECTIVE: To document our evolving surgical management of colonoscopic perforation and examine factors crucial to the improvement of patient care. DESIGN: We conducted a computer-based retrospective analysis of medical records (1980 through 1995). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Among 57,028 colonoscopic procedures performed, 43 patients (0.075%, or 1 perforation in 1,333 procedures) had a colonic perforation. Two additional patients were treated after colonoscopy performed elsewhere. The outcomes analyzed included surgical morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Twenty-six women and 19 men who ranged in age from 28 to 85 years (median, 69) were treated for colonic perforation. More than 80% of perforations occurred during the latter half of the study period because of the increased volume of colonoscopic procedures (8 perforations among 12,581 examinations from 1980 through 1987 versus 35 perforations among 44,447 colonoscopies from 1988 through 1995). Emergency laparotomy was performed in 42 patients (93%). Perforations occurred throughout the colon: right side = 10; transverse = 9; and left side = 23. Three patients without evidence of peritoneal irritation fared well with nonoperative management. Most patients underwent primary repair or limited resection in conjunction with end-to-end anastomosis. In 14 patients (33%), an ostomy was created. One patient underwent laparotomy without further treatment. Intra-abdominal contamination ranged from none (31%) to local soiling (48%) to diffusely feculent (21%). Postoperative complications occurred in 12 patients and were associated with older age (P = 0.01), large perforations (P = 0.03), and prior hospitalization (P = 0.04). No postoperative deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: Despite a consistently low risk of colonic perforation, the increasing use of colonoscopy in our practice has resulted in an increased number of iatrogenic colonic perforations. In order to minimize morbidity and mortality, prompt operative intervention is the best strategy in most patients. Non-operative management is warranted in carefully selected patients without peritoneal irritation.     

Magnetic resonance imaging of proximal aortopulmonary window

Of the 187 cases of infantile choledochal cyst treated at our hospitals, we encountered 13 with spontaneous perforation. All cases were under 4 years old. Eight cases were found to have biliary peritonitis and 5 had a sealed perforation. The shape of the extrahepatic bile duct was cystic in 8 and fusiform in 5. The cyst wall around the perforation was filmy and bile was found to be oozing through the thinned wall. Nine perforations were single while 4 cases had multiple perforations. Four of 17 perforations occurred in the posterior part of the cyst wall. Only 1 case of perforation was associated with protein plugs in a common channel, while 7 of the 10 cases of choledochal cyst requiring percutaneous biliary drainage due to signs of raised intrabiliary pressure were found to have protein plugs. We consider that spontaneous perforation of a choledochal cyst is not rare in infancy. The etiology of a perforation must be epithelial irritation of the biliary tract due to refluxed pancreatic juice caused by pancreatico-biliary malunion associated with mural immaturity due to infancy, rather than an abnormal rise in ductal pressure or congenital mural weakness at a certain point.     

A rational surgical approach for intra-thoracic esophageal perforation

The surgical experiences of intrathoracic esophageal perforation in 17 consecutive cases seen during the last eight years are reviewed. Using a rational approach to this critical condition, the mortality and morbidity rates were lower than before. For acute perforation in a corrosive-injured esophagus, subtotal esophagectomy by eversion stripping was an effective procedure for life saving. For acute perforation of a normal or chronic fibrotic but functional esophagus, early primary repair was usually successful for healing. For chronic esophageal perforation, usually complicated by mediastinal abscess or purulent pleural effusion, an adequate local drainage or supplemented with a newly designed, temporary diversion procedure for drainage of saliva and gastric acid was recommended.     

Nasal septum repair-plasty with pedicled flap technique in 126 patients--an analysis

BACKGROUND: The surgical closure of a nasal septal perforation is considered to be one of the most difficult procedures in nasal surgery with a relatively poor success rate. After a new surgical concept ("bipedicled-flap technique") was developed, a follow-up study was done in order to find out whether surgical results can be improved by means of this new method. PATIENTS AND METHOD: From 1988-1995 the bipedicled-flap technique was applied in 126 patients with nasal septal perforations (82 males, 44 females). In all patients the closure of the septal perforation was performed with an endonasal bilateral bipedicled-flap plasty and reconstruction of the cartilaginous defect with an autogenous cartilage graft from either the rib, the auricle, or from remnants of the septal cartilage. Postoperative results were evaluated in all patients. The follow-up period varied from a minimum of six months to a maximum of over seven years. RESULTS: The age peak was found in the third decade of life (females) and fifth decade (males), respectively. Most frequent preoperative symptoms were difficult nasal breathing, crusting and recurrent epistaxis. 65.8% of septal perforations were of iatrogenic origin. In 32 patients, the aetlology remained unknown. Six patients used silicone obturators preoperatively without getting any relief from complaints. In nine patients, surgical repair of the septal perforation had been attempted previously at another hospital. With the bipedicled-flap technique, primary closure was achieved in 118 patients (= 93.6%); revision surgery (same technique) was successfully performed in 2 patients, increasing the final success rate to 95.2%. Complications were rare and could always be managed easily. CONCLUSIONS: At present, the bipedicled-flap technique appears to be the most successful method for surgical repair of nasal septal perforations. The underlying principles responsible for the good success rate are: (1) the bilateral closure of the mucosal defects; and (2) the additional reconstruction of the cartilaginous septal defect with an autogenous cartilage graft only.     

The role of esophagectomy in the management of esophageal perforations

BACKGROUND: Despite the many advancements made in thoracic surgery, the management of patients with esophageal perforation remains problematic and controversial. METHODS: Between 1985 and 1995, 27 esophagectomies were performed for perforation of the thoracic esophagus. A retrospective review of the records of these patients was carried out, and a scoring scale developed by Elebute and Stoner to grade the severity of sepsis was applied. RESULTS: Among the 27 patients undergoing esophagectomy for a perforation, the interval between rupture and esophagectomy was less than 24 hours in only 11 patients (40.7%). Postoperative surgical complications occurred in 4 patients (14.8%) and nonsurgical complications, in 7 (25.9%). The hospital mortality rate was 3.7% (1/27). In 14 patients, primary reconstruction was performed in the bed of the excised esophagus. There were no anastomotic leaks in this subgroup. This suggests that an anastomosis between viable, well-vascularized tissues is more important for successful healing than avoidance of some degree of contamination of the adjacent mediastinum. On follow-up, which averages 41 months, 73% of patients (16/22) have neither symptoms nor complaints. CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal resection definitively eliminates the source of intrathoracic sepsis, the perforation, and the affected esophagus. Reconstruction carried out in one stage does not increase operative morbidity. Esophageal resection and reconstruction is a valid approach even in cases of spontaneous perforation in which the diagnosis is markedly delayed.     

The surgical management of toxic dilatation of the colon: a report of 28 cases and review of the literature

Experience with 28 patients with toxic dilatation of the colon is reviewed. The operative mortality in this series was 32% (9/28). Eight of the 9 patients who died were found to have colonic perforations at operation; in contrast, the group of patients with no perforations had a mortality rate of only 6%. Colonic perforation and sepsis were the most significant factors contributing to mortality and morbidity in this series. A review of the literature showed an overall operative mortality rate of 19.5% for patients with toxic megacolon; the mortality rate was 41% for patients with perforations and 8.8% for patients without perforations. It appears that the keystone to successful management is the avoidance of colonic perforation and sepsis; protracted medical management of toxic megacolon seems to have been at least partly responsible for these complications. Sixteen of the 18 survivors following subtotal colectomy required removal of the rectum within 9 months because of continued symptoms and disease in the rectal stump.     

Intrathoracic lymphadenopathy in patients with empyema

PURPOSE: Our goal was to determine the prevalence of intrathoracic lymphadenopathy on chest CT in patients with empyema. METHOD: We retrospectively identified 27 patients (14 men, 13 women, mean age 43 years) with nontuberculous empyema examined with chest CT. All scans were reviewed by two of three board-certified radiologists for the presence of intrathoracic lymphadenopathy (> or = 1 cm, short axis) in an American Thoracic Society (ATS) nodal station or the internal mammary region. Differences were resolved by consensus. RESULTS: Thirteen (48%) patients with empyema had lymphadenopathy on chest CT. The mean number of enlarged lymph nodes for the patients with lymphadenopathy was 3.2 (SD +/-2.3, range 1-8). The mean size of the largest lymph node was 1.4 cm (range 1.0-2.5 cm). The lymphadenopathy was unilateral and ipsilateral to the empyema in seven (54%), bilateral in five (38%), and unilateral contralateral to the empyema in one. The distribution of lymphadenopathy according to ATS nodal stations was 4R (n = 8), 7 (n = 6), 10R (n = 5); n = 2 each 2R, 10L, 11L; and n = 1 each 11R, 2L, 4L, and 6. Four patients had internal mammary lymphadenopathy. Pleural fluid and smooth pleural thickening were present in each case. Four patients had follow-up CT after treatment. There was a decrease or resolution of the lymphadenopathy in each case. CONCLUSION: Intrathoracic lymphadenopathy is a common CT finding in patients with empyema and occurred in 48% of this series. In patients with smooth pleural thickening and pleural effusion, intrathoracic lymphadenopathy should not be used as a criterion to differentiate empyema from malignant or tuberculous pleural effusion.     

Evidence of peripheral axonal neuropathy in primary restless legs syndrome

The aim of this study was to assess the risk and prognostic factors of gut perforation after orthotopic liver transplantation in children with biliary, atresia using univariate and stepwise regression analysis. Among 51 pediatric recipients who underwent transplantation because of biliary atresia after failure of portoenterostomy, 10 patients (20%) had 19 episodes of gut perforations after 14 transplantations. The median delay between transplantation and perforation was 13 days. These perforations were treated either by suture (n = 21) or ostomy (n = 11). The study of preoperative and perioperative variables showed that children with gut perforation were in surgery for a significantly longer period of time including a longer period of receiving hepatectomy and undergoing portal venous clamp. These children also needed large amounts of blood transfused during hepatectomy. After transplantation there was no difference regarding total steroid doses and early occurrence of cytomegalovirus disease between the two groups. Stepwise regression analysis identified three factors associated with the occurrence of gut perforation: duration of transplant operation, posttransplant intra-abdominal bleeding requiring reoperation, and early portal vein thrombosis. During the postoperative course, severe fungal infections were significantly more frequent in the gut perforation group. The 3-year patient survival rate was 70% in the group with gut perforation and was not different from the group without perforation (80%). This study shows that children with previous portoenterostomy carry a high risk of developing gut perforation after liver transplantation. This is especially true for those patients with the most difficult hepatectomies, which are responsible for the iatrogenic injury of the bowel. Other risk factors pointed out in this study were splanchnic congestion in case of prolonged portal venous clamp time or early portal vein thrombosis and repeated trauma of the bowel caused by reoperations. On the other hand, other well known risk factors, such as steroid therapy and viral diseases, were not involved in the occurrence of gut perforations in this study. Besides emergent surgical treatment, this type of complication requires aggressive therapy against fungal infections.     

Dynamic phenotypic restructuring of the CD4 and CD8 T-cell subsets with age in healthy humans: a compartmental model analysis

The incidence of ulcer perforation in 1480 patients treated in the Bergen area of Norway between 1935 and 1990 was analyzed for daily (circadian), weekly (circaseptan), and yearly (circannual) time effects. A circadian rhythm was found overall that was reproducible and fairly stable across seasons, decades, and days of the week. After subgrouping, a circadian rhythm was found in younger patients, males, and duodenal perforations, while a 12 h (circasemidian) rhythm characterized ulcer perforation for women and for gastric ulcers. Duodenal perforations showed highest incidence in the afternoon, while gastric perforations showed a major peak around noon and a secondary peak near midnight. For duodenal ulcer perforation, the circannual pattern was characterized by a 6-month rhythm, with significantly higher incidence in May-June-July and in November-December in most subgroups. A circaseptan rhythm was not found, but there was a significantly higher incidence on Thursday-Friday as compared to Sunday-Monday. The pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the perforation of an ulcer thus seemed to show pronounced circadian and 6-month rhythmic variations, much less so circaseptan or circannual rhythms. While it is likely that exogenous environmental and/or societal factors play a significant role, variations in ulcer perforation may be related to endogenous biological rhythms in pathophysiological factors since the circadian pattern of duodenal perforation follows that for gastric acidity. Knowledge of the temporal patterns in peptic ulcer perforation and associated pathophysiologic factors should prove useful in optimizing the chronotherapeutic management of ulcer disease.     

Conservative management of colonoscopic perforation can be misleading

The management of colonoscopic perforations is still evolving. Many now agree to the selective management strategy: Perforations during diagnostic colonoscopy being treated surgically and therapeutic ones treated conservatively. However, patients with diagnostic perforation, if they have clean bowel and no signs of peritonitis, are still treated conservatively. We report here the case of a woman who had a perforation during diagnostic colonoscopy who was treated medically with good progress and no signs of peritonitis during her hospital stay for five days, but collapsed and died at home two days later.     

Spontaneous gastroduodenal perforation in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Spontaneous gastroduodenal perforation is a rare and lethal complication in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. METHODOLOGY: Data of 9 patients with spontaneous gastroduodenal perforation occurring during chemotherapy were reviewed. RESULTS: All 9 patients were male with an average age of 54.4+/-2.5 years. The primary malignancies included 5 head and neck cancers, 2 esophageal cancers, 1 malignant lymphoma, and 1 hepatocellular carcinoma. Abdominal pain was the most common symptom. The average interval between the onset of symptoms and surgery was 2.9+/-0.7 days (range: 16 hours to 7 days). Perforation was located on the duodenum (6 patients) and on the lower part of the body of the stomach (3 patients). Simple closure of the perforation was performed on 8 patients, and subtotal gastrectomy on 1 patient. Culture of the ascitic fluid of 8 patients revealed E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, streptococcus viridans, and enterococcus. Four patients (44.4%) had post-operative complications. The 30-day post-operative mortality was 44.4% (4/9). Three patients died of sepsis with multiple organ failure, and 1 died of hepatic failure. Age, anaemia, leukopenia, serum albumin levels, impaired renal or liver functions are not significant operative risk factors. Pre-operative shock is a significant factor in predicting operative mortality and complications. CONCLUSIONS: High index with suspicion of the disease with early treatment may improve survival of cancer patients with spontaneous gastroduodenal perforation.