Improved adhesion of EVAs with different vinyl acetate contents treated with sulphuric acid

Four ethylene vinyl acetate copolymers (EVAs) containing 9, 12, 18 and 20 wt% vinyl acetate (VA) were treated with concentrated sulphuric acid to improve their adhesion to polychloroprene (PCP) adhesive. The tensile strength and Young's modulus of EVAs decreased as the VA content increased, due to the reduction in crystallinity of the polyethylene blocks in the copolymer. The modifications produced in the EVAs by treatment with sulphuric acid were followed using contact angle measurements (water, 25 °C), ATR-IR spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Adhesive-bond strength was obtained by T-peel tests on treated EVA/polychloroprene adhesive joints. The vinyl acetate content in the EVA affected the extent, but not the nature, of the surface modification produced by treatment with sulphuric acid. The treatment produced both sulfonation and oxidation on the EVA surfaces. The higher the vinyl acetate content in the EVA, the more significant the modifications produced. Increased T-peel strengths of EVA/polychloroprene adhesive + 5 wt% polyisocyanate joints were obtained and a mixed failure (adhesion failure + cohesive failure in the adhesive) was produced. It was found that, to be effective, the treatment of EVAs must be carried out with 96 wt% sulphuric acid.     

Improvement of adhesion and paint ability of EVA copolymers with different vinyl acetate contents by treatment with UV-ozone

The surface modifications produced by UV-ozone treatment of two ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymers containing 12 and 20 wt% vinyl acetate (EVA12 and EVA20 respectively) were studied. The treatment with UV-ozone improved the wettability of both EVAs due to the creation of new carbon–oxygen moieties. The extent of these modifications increased with increasing length of the treatment and the modifications produced in EVA20 were produced for shorter lengths of treatment. The UV-ozone treatment also created roughness and heterogeneities on the EVA surfaces. Whereas roughness formation prevailed on the UV-ozone treated EVA12, important ablation was dominant on the treated EVA20. T-peel strength values in joints made with polychloroprene adhesive increased when the EVAs were treated with UV-ozone. Short length of UV-ozone treatment (1 min) produced higher T-peel strength in joints made with EVA20 whereas higher T-peel strength values in joints made with EVA12 were obtained after treatment for 5–7.5 min in which a cohesive failure into a weak boundary layer on the treated EVA surface was found. Furthermore, the adhesion of UV-ozone treated EVA20 to acrylic paint increased. Finally, the ageing resistance of the treated EVA/polychloroprene adhesive joints was good and the surface modifications on the UV-ozone treated EVAs lasted for 24 h after treatment at least.     

Surface modifications of EVA copolymers induced by low pressure RF plasmas from different gases and their relation to adhesion properties

Two ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymers (12 and 20 wt% of vinyl acetate,VA, content) have been treated with low pressure RF plasmas from non-oxidizing gases (Ar, N₂) and oxidizing gases (air, a mixture of 4N₂: 6O₂ (v/v), O₂ and CO₂). The formation of polar moieties on both EVAs was more noticeable by treatment with plasmas from non-oxidizing gases than from oxidizing ones (the higher the reactivity, the lower the difference with respect to untreated EVA surfaces). The surface etching with the non-oxidizing plasmas, giving rise to a high roughness, depends on the wt% of VA in the composition of the copolymer because of the different resistances of VA (low) and PE (high) to the non-oxidizing plasma particles bombardment. The adhesion properties obtained using a polyurethane adhesive (PU) showed high T-peel strength values and adhesion failure in EVAs treated with plasmas from oxidizing gases, due to roughness produced causing mechanical interlocking of the adhesive. Lower T-peel strength values were obtained with non-oxidizing plasmas: the values for EVA12 being, in general, lower than those obtained for EVA20. The durability of the treated EVAs/PU adhesive joints after ageing in humidity and temperature was quite good.     

SURFACE MODIFICATIONS ON EVA TREATED WITH SULPHURIC ACID

In this study, treatment with sulphuric acid was used to increase the adhesion of an ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer containing 20 wt% vinyl acetate (EVA20). The treatment with sulphuric acid improved the wettability of EVA20 due to thecreation of different oxygen and sulphonic acid moieties on the surface. The treatment also created cracks and heterogeneities on the EVA20 surface, and enhanced T-peel strength values of EVA20/polychloroprene adhesive+5 wt% isocyanate joints were obtained. The loci of failure of the joints were mixed, i.e. , adhesional and cohesive in the adhesive. Peel strength values of both as-received and sulphuric acid-treated EVA20/polychloroprene adhesive joints increased after ageing at 50°C and 95 wt% relative humidity for 72 because the complete cure of the adhesive was thereby was produced. The durability of the EVA20 treated with sulphuric acid was monitored between 15 min and 5 years. High peel strength values were obtained for times up to 61 days; the joints produced with the treated EVA20 five years after treatment showed lower peel strength value due to the creation of a weak boundary layer produced by reaction of the residual sulphuric acid on the surface with EVA20. On the other hand, different experimental variables in the treatment of EVA20 with sulphuric acid were considered. The optimum treatment conditions for EVA20 were obtained by immersion in highly concentrated sulphuric acid (96 wt%) for one minute followed by neutralisation with ammonium hydroxide.     

Surface modifications on eva treated with sulphuric acid

In this study, treatment with sulphuric acid was used to increase the adhesion of an ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer containing 20 wt% vinyl acetate (EVA20). The treatment with sulphuric acid improved the wettability of EVA20 due to thecreation of different oxygen and sulphonic acid moieties on the surface. The treatment also created cracks and heterogeneities on the EVA20 surface, and enhanced T-peel strength values of EVA20/polychloroprene adhesive+5 wt% isocyanate joints were obtained. The loci of failure of the joints were mixed, i.e. , adhesional and cohesive in the adhesive. Peel strength values of both as-received and sulphuric acid-treated EVA20/polychloroprene adhesive joints increased after ageing at 50°C and 95 wt% relative humidity for 72 because the complete cure of the adhesive was thereby was produced. The durability of the EVA20 treated with sulphuric acid was monitored between 15 min and 5 years. High peel strength values were obtained for times up to 61 days; the joints produced with the treated EVA20 five years after treatment showed lower peel strength value due to the creation of a weak boundary layer produced by reaction of the residual sulphuric acid on the surface with EVA20. On the other hand, different experimental variables in the treatment of EVA20 with sulphuric acid were considered. The optimum treatment conditions for EVA20 were obtained by immersion in highly concentrated sulphuric acid (96 wt%) for one minute followed by neutralisation with ammonium hydroxide.     

Characterization of eva-based adhesives containing different amounts of rosin ester or polyterpene tackifier

Different amounts (50-170 php--parts per hundred parts of EVA, 33-63 wt%) of two tackifiers (hydrogenated rosin ester, polyterpene resin) were added to an ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymer containing 28 wt% vinyl acetate. The EVA and the tackifier were characterized using infrared (IR) spectroscopy, DSC measurements, and stress-controlled plate-plate rheology. The properties and compatibility of the EVA-tackifier mixtures were studied using DSC, DMTA, and stress-controlled plate-plate rheology. Immediate adhesion was measured as a quantification of tack, and the T-peel strength of roughened styrene-butadiene rubber/EVA-tackifier adhesive joints was also obtained. The increase in the amount of tackifier noticeably changed the crystallinity of polyethylene blocks in the EVA, and the temperature at the cross-over between the curves of the storage and loss moduli as a function of the temperature was displaced to a lower value. Whereas the hydrogenated rosin ester was compatible with the amorphous ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer regions of the EVA (Tg value increased) reducing its crystallinity, the polyterpene resin was compatible with the polyethylene blocks of the EVA (T g value was not modified), increasing its crystallinity. Immediate adhesion of the EVA-tackifier mixtures was improved by adding both hydrogenated rosin ester and polyterpene tackifiers. On the other hand, there was an optimum tackifier content at which the maximum T-peel strength value was obtained.     

CHARACTERIZATION OF EVA-BASED ADHESIVES CONTAINING DIFFERENT AMOUNTS OF ROSIN ESTER OR POLYTERPENE TACKIFIER

Different amounts (50-170 php--parts per hundred parts of EVA, 33-63 wt%) of two tackifiers (hydrogenated rosin ester, polyterpene resin) were added to an ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymer containing 28 wt% vinyl acetate. The EVA and the tackifier were characterized using infrared (IR) spectroscopy, DSC measurements, and stress-controlled plate-plate rheology. The properties and compatibility of the EVA-tackifier mixtures were studied using DSC, DMTA, and stress-controlled plate-plate rheology. Immediate adhesion was measured as a quantification of tack, and the T-peel strength of roughened styrene-butadiene rubber/EVA-tackifier adhesive joints was also obtained. The increase in the amount of tackifier noticeably changed the crystallinity of polyethylene blocks in the EVA, and the temperature at the cross-over between the curves of the storage and loss moduli as a function of the temperature was displaced to a lower value. Whereas the hydrogenated rosin ester was compatible with the amorphous ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer regions of the EVA (Tg value increased) reducing its crystallinity, the polyterpene resin was compatible with the polyethylene blocks of the EVA (T g value was not modified), increasing its crystallinity. Immediate adhesion of the EVA-tackifier mixtures was improved by adding both hydrogenated rosin ester and polyterpene tackifiers. On the other hand, there was an optimum tackifier content at which the maximum T-peel strength value was obtained.     

A new water-based chemical treatment based on sodium dichloroisocyanurate (DCI) for rubber soles in the footwear industry

A new water-based chemical treatment based on sodium dichloroisocyanurate (DCI) solutions for rubber soles of different natures is reported in this study. Different concentrations (1-5 wt%) of DCI and two rubber formulations (vulcanized styrene-butadiene rubber, R2; thermoplastic rubber, TR) were considered. The effects produced by treatment of the rubber soles with DCI were compared with the standard halogenation method using trichloroisocyanuric acid (TCI) solutions in an organic solvent (ethyl acetate). The effects of chlorination on the rubber surfaces were studied using contact angle measurements, ATR-IR spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. The adhesion strength was obtained from T-peel strength tests on canvas/PUD adhesive/treated rubber joints. The adhesive used throughout this study was a water-based polyurethane dispersion (PUD). The surface treatment with aqueous DCI solutions modified the surface chemistry of both the TR and R2 rubbers, creating C—Cl moieties on the surface and removing the zinc stearate from the R2 rubber surface. The use of a low DCI concentration in water was less effective in modifying the TR rubber, but was sufficient to obtain good T-peel strength values for the R2 rubber joints. On the other hand, heterogeneities and cracks were created on the rubber surface (mainly on the R2 rubber surface), which may contribute to an increase in the mechanical interlocking with the adhesive. A noticeable increase in the T-peel strength and a cohesive failure in the rubber for the joints produced with TR rubber were obtained when the rubber was treated with aqueous DCI solutions. For the canvas/PUD adhesive/chlorinated R2 rubber joint, the failure was located in a thin surface layer on the canvas. Finally, the surface treatment with TCI in ethyl acetate produced a more significant surface modification on both the TR and the R2 rubber, creating deeper roughness on the R2 rubber surface. Consequently, higher peel strength values were obtained using TCI solutions in ethyl acetate. Furthermore, the T-peel strength values were high in all joints produced with TR rubber treated with either TCI solution in ethyl acetate or aqueous DCI solution.     

Selective surface modification of ethylene-vinyl acetate and ethylene polymer blend by UV–ozone treatment

Ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymers intended for sport sole manufacturing may contain noticeable amounts of polyethylene (LDPE) for improving abrasion resistance and decrease cost; however, this blend (EVA–PE) had low polarity and showed poor adhesion. In this study an effective environmentally friendly and fast surface treatment based on UV–ozone has been used to increase the wettability, polarity and roughness of EVA–PE material. Both the length of the UV–ozone treatment and the distance between the material surface and the UV-radiation source were tested. The UV–ozone treated EVA–PE material was characterized by ATR-IR spectroscopy using Ge prism, water contact angle measurements, X-Ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Adhesion properties were obtained from T peel tests of as-received and UV–ozone treated EVA–PE/polyurethane adhesive/leather joints.The more extended length of treatment and the shorter UV source–substrate distance increased the wettability of the EVA–PE material. Oxidation of the EVA–PE surface was produced by UV–ozone treatment creating new carbonyl groups mainly, and the amounts of hydroxyl and carboxylic groups were increased. The UV–ozone treatment produced ablation and etching of the EVA–PE material surface, mainly in the vinyl acetate, creating a particular roughness consisting on ruffles with deep crevices; this topography was also produced by heating produced during UV–ozone treatment. For low length of UV treatment or high UV source–material distance, the modifications of the EVA–PE material were mainly produced in the ethylene causing the selective removal of vinyl acetate, whereas more aggressive conditions produced strong oxidation in the EVA–PE material. Finally, adhesive strength was noticeably increased in the UV–ozone treated EVA–PE/polyurethane adhesive joints, and a cohesive failure in the leather was obtained.     

Chlorination of SBS rubbers with different styrene contents using trichloro-isocyanuric acid

In order to improve their adhesion to polyurethane adhesives, three unvulcanized block styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS) rubbers with styrene contents between 33% and 55% were surface-treated with solutions of 2 wt% trichloro-isocyanuric acid (TCI) in ethyl acetate. The joint strength was estimated using T-peel tests and the failed surfaces were analyzed to assess the locus of failure. The failed surfaces were analyzed using ATR-IR spectroscopy, contact angle measurements, XPS, and SEM. An unexpected trend in the joint strength was obtained because the locus of failure depended on both the styrene content and the mechanical properties of each SBS rubber. A mixed mode of failure was obtained in joints produced with S 1 rubber (33 wt% styrene content), whereas failure in the chlorinated layer was observed with S3 rubber (55 wt% styrene content); cohesive failure in the adhesive was found for the joints produced with S2 rubber (44 wt% styrene content).     

Influence of the polarity of ethylene–vinyl acetate copolymers on the morphology and mechanical properties of their uncompatibilised blends with polystyrene

Rubber‐toughened polystyrene has been extensively studied and is a well‐established technology. However, the use of thermoplastic elastomers to toughen polystyrene (PS) is new and has the potential for further investigations. In the present study, three EVAs (ethylene–vinyl acetate copolymers) with identical melt flow indices (MFIs), of ～2.5 dgmin^?1, but different vinyl acetate (VA) contents, of 9.3 wt% (EVA760), 18.0 wt% (EVA460) and 28.0 wt% (EVA265), were melt blended with PS at 180 °C, and various ASTM test pieces were injection moulded at 200 °C. The polarity of the dispersed phase (ie EVA), has a significant effect on the mechanical properties of the blends. Both mechanical and rheological studies reveal that the uncompatibilised PS/EVA265 blends exhibit some degree of compatibility when the amount of EVA265 is lower than 30 wt%. These results indicate that EVA265 with the highest VA content is the most effective impact modifier for PS. The results clearly show that increasing the VA content in EVA increases the polarity of the dispersed phase, approaching that of the matrix (ie PS) and subsequently improving the compatibility between the two phases in terms of interfacial adhesion. © 2002 Society of Chemical Industry     

Preparation and characterization of ethylene‐vinyl acetate nanocomposites: enhanced flame retardant

Ethylene‐vinyl acetate (EVA) nanocomposites with enhanced flame retardance were prepared by the sol–gel process in the melt. Two EVAs with different vinyl acetate (VA) contents and aluminium isopropoxide were used as organic and inorganic phases. The nanocomposites were prepared in a batch mixer under constant processing conditions and were analysed by several characterization techniques. Aluminium isopropoxide presented low activation energy, which allows the synthesis of the nanoparticles without a post step treatment. The reaction mechanism is proposed. Nanocomposites with smaller and well dispersed metal nanoparticles were produced with an EVA with higher VA content. EVA nanocomposites achieve the requirements for 94 V‐0 classification. © 2013 Society of Chemical Industry     

Vinyl acetate content and electron beam irradiation directed alteration of structure,morphology, and associated properties of EVA/EPDM blends

A series of ethylene vinyl acetate/ethylene–propylene diene elastomer (EVA/EPDM) blends with four types of EVAs with various vinyl acetate (VA) content, are prepared without and with crosslinker, trimethylol propane triacrylate (TMPTA). These are irradiated by electron beam (EB). As the VA content increases, the gel content, i.e., degree of crosslinking of EVA/EPDM blends, is increased. With increase in VA content, the modulus and tensile strength are decreased but elongation at break is increased due to increase in amorphousness. On EB irradiation, modulus and tensile strengths are increased but at the cost of elongation at break. Crystallinities of all blends are decreased with increase in VA and EB crosslinking. The thermal stability of EVA/EPDM blend is decreased with increase in VA content but increased after EB irradiation. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) show that with increase in VA content the miscibility of two polymers keeps on increasing, which even become more after EB irradiation. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016 , 133, 43468.     

Surface Analysis of Debonded Chlorinated Vulcanized Styrene-Butadiene Rubber Joints

A synthetic vulcanized styrene-butadiene rubber (R) was treated with a halogenation agent (TCI = trichloroisocyanuric acid) to produce improved adhesion (i.e. high T-peel strength) in joints prepared with a one-component, solvent-based polyester urethane adhesive. Several amounts (0.5 to 7 wt%) of TCI solutions in ethyl acetate were applied to the rubber surface and, after T-peel tests were carried out, the surfaces of the debonded chlorinated rubber pieces were analyzed with XPS, ATR-infra-red (ATR-IR) spectroscopy, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) coupled with EDX analysis, and contact angle measurements. The T-peel strength of unchlorinated rubber (0 wt% TCl) joints was small due to the migration of low molecular species (mainly microcrystalline wax) to the rubber surface during the cure of the adhesive, creating a weak layer in which the failure was produced. Chlorination with amounts of TCI up to 2 wt% produced a noticeable increase in T-peel strength, but treatment with higher amounts of TCI resulted in a decrease in joint strength. Although chlorination with TCI created chlorinated hydrocarbon groups and C-O moieties on the rubber surface, the surface in contact with the adhesive was additionally degraded and, consequently, the locus of failure of the joints varied in a manner which depended on the amount of TCI applied to the surface. Treatment with amounts of TCI up to 2 wt% did not greatly degrade the rubber surface and the mode of failure of the joint was mainly interfacial. Chlorination at higher TCI concentration produced a weak chlorinated surface layer which was was mechanically weak, facilitating the failure in this layer during the T-peel test. The thickness of the chlorinated layer created on the treated rubber is about 5 Fm, and the thickness seemed to be independent of the amount of TCI applied to the rubber surface.     

Influence of the vinyl acetate content and the tackifier nature on the rheological,thermal, and adhesion properties of EVA adhesives

Three ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymers with different vinyl acetate (VA) contents (28-40 wt%) were mixed with rosin ester and polyterpene resin tackifiers in a 1 : 1 (weight/weight) ratio. The rheological and thermal properties of the tackifiers were determined and the use of rheological measurements as a precise way to measure the softening point of the tackifiers is proposed. The glass transition temperature of the tackifiers was obtained from the second heating run, after the thermal history of the tackifiers was removed. The addition of the rosin ester to EVA produced a compatible mixture, whereas for the terpene resin a less compatible mixture was obtained. The increase in the VAamount decreased the crystallinity of EVAand both the storage and the loss moduli also decreased, but the peel strength and the immediate adhesion were increased. The immediate adhesion of EVA/tackifier blends was affected by both the compatibility and the rheological properties of the blends. In fact, a relationship between the mechanical storage modulus (E^t′) - obtained from DMTA experiments - of the adhesives and the immediate adhesion to thin rubber substrates was obtained. The adhesives containing the T tackifier showed higher moduli than those containing the G tackifier, and therefore higher peel strength values were obtained. An increase in the VA content increased the flexibility of the adhesives and thus a decrease in peel strength was obtained.     

The effect of corona discharge treatment of ethylene copolymers on their adhesion to aluminum

The efficiency of different techniques of obtain improved adhesion in polyethylene-aluminum laminates have been studied. Both surface treatments, such as thermal oxidation and corona discharge, and the use of copolymers with polar comonomers, i.e., vinyl acetate (EVA) and butyl acrylate (EBA), have been included. Thermal oxidation performed by high temperature extrusion including an ozone shower seems to be more effective than corona discharge. In a model experiment thermal oxidation was studied in more detail. The adhesion, as measured by a T-peel test, increased with the content of carbonyl measured by reflexion IR, except for relatively long thermal treatments. In the latter case molecular scission gave a large fraction of low molecular weight material with low cohesive strength. For EBA and EVA the peel strength increased linearly with the bulk concentration of comonomer from about 100 N/m for untreated polyethylene to 450 and 300 N/m, respectively, at 5 mol % comonomer. Corona discharge treatment of these copolymers had, however, a most remarkable effect on the adhesion properties. The increases, relative to untreated EBA and EVA, were much more dramatic compared to polyethylene, e.g., three to four and less than two times, respectively. The higher values obtained with EBA are suggested to be due to the conversion of acrylate groups into carboxylic acid. In the case of EVA, loss of acetic acid might instead decrease the content of polar groups.     

Viscoelastic and adhesion properties of hot-melts made with blends of ethylene-co-n-butyl acrylate (EBA) and ethylene-co-vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymers

Several hot-melts (HMAs) were prepared by using blends of ethylene-co-n-butyl acrylate (EBA) and ethylene-co-vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymers - EBA/EVA. HMAs were prepared with mixtures of EVA copolymers with 18 (EVA18) and 27 (EVA27) wt% vinyl acetate contents and EBA copolymer with 27 wt% n-butyl acrylate, polyterpene resin and mixture of microcrystalline and Fischer-Tropsch waxes. HMAs made with EBA/EVA blends showed lower viscosities and reduced shear thinning than the ones made with EBA or EVA due to differences in compatibility, but both the set time and the open time were not affected as they depended mainly on the wax nature and amount. The increase of the vinyl acetate (VA) content in EVA copolymer reduced the crystallinity of the EBA/EVA blends. Even EBA copolymer was more compatible with EVA27 than with EVA18 (the α- and β-transitions shown in DMTA plots were closer) and the compatibility did not vary with the EBA content in the blends. The addition of polyterpene resin and the mixture of waxes decreased the compatibility of the EBA/EVA blends, the higher compatibility was observed for the HMAs made with only one copolymer. The tack of the HMAs depended on their EBA/EVA contents, EBA/EVA27 HMAs showed broader temperature interval with higher tack, while the tack of EBA/EVA18 HMAs blend decreased and the temperature interval with tack was shortened and shifted to lower temperatures. Adhesion to polypropylene film was improved in HMAs made with 75 wt% EBA/25 wt% EVA18 and 50–75 wt% EBA/50-25 wt% EVA27. The adhesion to aluminum film of EBA or EVA hot melts was improved only in the joints made with EBA/EVA 27 HMAs, more noticeably when they contained higher EBA content.     

Improved adhesion of low-density polyethylene/EVA foams using different surface treatments

The adhesion between a polyurethane (PU) adhesive and four foams containing different low-density polyethylene (LDPE)/ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) blends was improved by using different surface treatments. UV-ozone, corona discharge, and low-pressure oxygen plasma treatments for different times were used to increase the surface energy of the foams. The low-pressure oxygen plasma was the most successful surface treatment to promote the adhesion of the foams. A reduced length of treatment was needed to improve the adhesion of the foams containing higher EVA content. The surface treatments produced a noticeable decrease in contact angle values due mainly to the creation of different carbon–oxygen moieties and to the formation of cracks/heterogeneities on the foams surfaces. After oxygen plasma, removal of non-polar material from EVA surfaces allowed to expose acetate groups which are likely to be important for increasing the adhesion of the foams.     

Gamma radiation aging of EVA/EPDM blends: Effect of vinyl acetate (VA) content and radiation dose on the alteration in mechanical,thermal, and morphological behavior

A series of ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA)/ethylene‐propylene diene elastomer (EPDM) blends (50/50 ratio) with four types of EVAs were prepared using brabender type batch mixer followed by compression molding. All compression‐molded samples were exposed to gamma radiation at 500, 1000, and 1500 kGy doses and were subjected to mechanical, compression set, thermal and morphological test. The % retention in tensile strength, elongation, and hardness were found higher for higher vinyl acetate (VA) containing radiation aged EVA/EPDM blends. The compression set value was decreased with increase of VA content. The thermal degradation kinetics of high VA containing irradiated blend (EVA40/EPDM) (EVA40 is 40%VA containing EVA) was found slower than those of lower VA containing blend (EVA18/EPDM). The surface morphology for EVA18/EPDM sample was transformed into more irregular one with more cracks and fragmented segments by aging at 1500 kGy dose while surface for EVA40/EPDM sample was found comparatively smooth, fine, and continuous with very few cracks and fragmented parts at similar dose. Thus, from the measured properties and morphology, it was revealed that the degree of degradation of blends kept on decreasing with increase in VA content. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018 , 135, 46216.     

UV treatment of synthetic styrene-butadiene-styrene rubber

The effectiveness of the treatment with ultraviolet light (UV) on several polymeric surfaces has previously been established. In this study, a low pressure mercury vapour lamp was used as a source of UV radiation for the surface treatment of a difficult-to-bond block styrenebutadiene-styrene rubber (S6), the treatment time ranging from 10 s to 30 min. The UV-treated S6 rubber surfaces were characterized by contact angle measurements (ethylene glycol, 25°C), ATR-IR spectroscopy, XPS, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), and Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM). T-peel tests on UV-treated S6 rubber/polyurethane (PU) adhesive/ leather joints (before and after ageing) were carried out to quantify adhesion strengths. The UV treatment of S6 rubber produced improved wettability, the formation of C—O, C=O and COO^- moieties, and ablation (removal of a thin rubber layer from the surface). The extent of these modifications increased with increasing treatment time. The extended UV treatment produced greater surface modifications, as well as the incorporation of nitrogen moieties at the surface. Furthermore, noticeable ablation of S6 rubber surface occurred. Peel strength values increased with increased treatment time of UV treatment of S6 rubber. Also, with increasing treatment time, the adhesive joints showed different loci of failure: adhesional failure for the as-received and 2 min-UV treated S6 rubber/polyurethane adhesive/leather joints changed to mixed failure (cohesive in the treated S6 rubber + adhesional failure) for the 30 min-UV treated S6 rubber/polyurethane adhesive/leather joint.