Salmeterol xinafoate as maintenance therapy compared with albuterol in patients with asthma

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of inhaled salmeterol xinafoate, a long-acting beta 2-adrenoceptor agonist, with that of albuterol, a short-acting inhaled beta 2-agonist, in the treatment of asthma. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. SETTING: Eleven outpatient clinical centers. SUBJECTS: A total of 322 male and female patients at least 12 years of age with chronic symptomatic asthma requiring daily therapy. INTERVENTION: Patients were treated with salmeterol xinafoate (42 micrograms inhaled twice daily), albuterol (180 micrograms inhaled four times daily), or placebo (four times a day) for 12 weeks; patients in all three groups could use inhaled albuterol as backup medication for breakthrough symptoms. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Serial 12-hour forced expiratory flow in 1 second (FEV1), peak expiratory flow (PEF), asthma symptoms, nocturnal awakenings due to asthma, episodes of asthma exacerbations, and electrocardiography. RESULTS: The mean area under the curve for FEV1 throughout each 12-hour period was consistently greater after a single dose of salmeterol than after two doses of albuterol administered 6 hours apart (P < .001), with the difference ranging from 3.1 to 4.3 L.h. Salmeterol produced an average increase in morning and evening PEF of 26 and 29 L/min, respectively, over pretreatment values compared with decreases of -13 and -3 L/min, respectively, in the albuterol group and -2 L/min both in the morning and evening in the placebo group (P < .001). Patients in the salmeterol group had significantly fewer days and nights with symptoms than did either the albuterol or placebo group (P < .001). Responses to salmeterol were similar at day 1 and at week 12. Adverse events in all treatment groups were equally infrequent, and no clinically significant change in cardiac rhythm was observed with salmeterol treatment. CONCLUSION: Salmeterol inhaled twice daily is more effective than albuterol inhaled four times a day (or as needed) in patients with asthma requiring maintenance therapy. No deterioration of asthma control was observed with the use of salmeterol over a 3-month period.     

Exhaled nitric oxide is higher both at day and night in subjects with nocturnal asthma

Nitric oxide in exhaled air is thought to reflect airway inflammation. No data have been reported so far on circadian changes in NO in subjects with nocturnal asthma. To determine whether exhaled NO shows a circadian rhythm inverse to the circadian rhythm in airway obstruction in subjects with nocturnal asthma, we conducted a study involving six healthy controls, eight individuals without nocturnal asthma (4-h to 16-h variation in peak expiratory flow [PEF] <= 15%), and six individuals with nocturnal asthma (4-h to 16-h PEF variation > 15%). Smoking, use of corticosteroids, and recent respiratory infections were excluded. NO concentrations were measured at 12, 16, 20, and 24 h, and at 4, 8, and 12 h of the next day, using the single-breath method. At the same times, FEV1 and PEF were also measured. Mean NO concentrations were significantly higher in subjects with nocturnal asthma than in subjects without nocturnal asthma, and higher in both groups than in healthy controls at all time points. Mean exhaled NO levels over 24 h correlated with the 4-h to 16-h variation in PEF (r = 0.61, p < 0.01). Exhaled NO did not show a significant circadian variation in any of the three groups as assessed with cosinor analysis, in contrast to the FEV1 in both asthma groups (p < 0.05). At 4 h, mean +/- SD NO levels were higher than at 16 h in subjects with nocturnal asthma; at 50 +/- 20 ppb versus 42 +/- 15 ppb (p < 0.05); other measurements at all time points were similar. Differences in NO and FEV1 from 4 h to 16 h did not correlate with one another. We conclude that subjects with nocturnal asthma exhale NO at higher levels both at night and during the day, which may reflect more severe diurnal airway-wall inflammation. A circadian rhythm in exhaled NO was not observed. NO levels did not correspond to the circadian rhythm in airway obstruction. The small increase in NO at 4 h may indicate an aspect of inflammation, but it is not associated with increased nocturnal airway obstruction.     

Salmeterol compared with slow-release terbutaline in nocturnal asthma. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, sequential clinical trial. French Multicenter Study Group

The aim of the multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group clinical trial with a 2-week treatment period was to compare the efficacy and safety of salmeterol (50 micrograms twice daily) with slow-release (SR) terbutaline (5 mg orally, twice daily) in nocturnal asthma. A total of 159 asthmatic adults (FEV, 50-90% of predicted value; sex ratio: 0.87) with at least two nocturnal awakenings during a 7-d run-in period was included in the study. Patients were centrally randomized with a national computer network (Minitel). The main variable (number of awakening-free nights during the last week of treatment) was analyzed according to a sequential method with the one-sided triangular test. The number of awakening-free nights (+/- SD) was significantly higher in the salmeterol group: 5.3 +/- 2.4 vs 4.6 +/- 2.3 (P = 0.006). Salmeterol was significantly more effective than SR-terbutaline in the following factors: number of patients without any awakening during the last week of treatment (50% vs 27%, P = 0.003), mean morning PEF (351 +/- 109 l/min-1 vs 332 +/- 105 l/min-1, P = 0.04), PEF diurnal variation 6 +/- 10% vs 11 +/- 12%, P = 0.01), overall assessment of efficacy by the patient and the investigator (P = 0.001 and 0.005, respectively), and daily rescue salbutamol intakes (P = 0.004). In the salmeterol group, significantly fewer patients reported adverse events (16% vs 29%, P = 0.04).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effect of short- and long-acting inhaled beta2-agonists on exhaled nitric oxide in asthmatic patients

Increased concentrations of exhaled nitric oxide (NO) occur in patients with asthma, and exhaled NO may be useful for assessing the effect of drug therapy on airway inflammation. Beta2-agonists have been proposed to have both proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory effects. We therefore assessed exhaled NO after beta2-agonists in asthmatic patients. Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies were conducted. Firstly, exhaled NO was measured in 18 asthmatics (9 taking inhaled glucocorticosteroids (GCS)) before and after nebulized salbutamol (5 mg), or identical placebo (0.9% saline). Exhaled NO and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) were measured at 15 min intervals for 1 h (Study 1). Secondly, the effect of 1 week of treatment with the long-acting beta2-agonist, salmeterol (50 microg b.i.d.), added to either budesonide (800 microg b.i.d.) or placebo, was studied in eight mild asthmatic subjects (Study 2). Exhaled NO was measured by a chemiluminescence analyser, adapted for on-line recording. In Study 1, exhaled NO showed no significant change at any time-point in patients not taking inhaled GCS. In asthmatics on inhaled GCS, exhaled NO increased compared to placebo at 15 and 30 min, but this did not reach statistical significance. In Study 2, treatment with salmeterol increased FEV1, but exhaled NO levels were not significantly changed, either after budesonide treatment (143+/-35 to 179+/-67 ppb), or after placebo (201+/-68 to 211+/-65 ppb). Our results confirm that single high dose salbutamol does not increase exhaled nitric oxide in asthmatics not taking inhaled glucocorticosteroids. Salbutamol may increase exhaled nitric oxide in asthmatics taking inhaled glucocorticosteroids. However, regular use of salmeterol resulted in no change in exhaled nitric oxide, either used alone or in combination with inhaled glucocorticosteroids.     

Tolerance to the protective effects of salmeterol on methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction: influence of inhaled corticosteroids

Long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists such as salmeterol reduce airway responsiveness for at least 12 h, but this effect seems to decrease with regular use. We evaluated the time-course of the protective effects of salmeterol on methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction, its modulation by inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and its influence on asthma control. Thirty two subjects (13 males and 19 females) with mild to moderate stable asthma were divided into two groups according to their medication needs: bronchodilators (BD) alone (n=16) or with ICS (n=16). After a 2 week run-in period, a double-blind crossover study was conducted. Subjects from both groups received salmeterol 50 microg b.i.d. or a placebo for 4 weeks each in random order, separated by a 2 week washout period. The provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (PC20) was measured before and after each treatment period, 1 h prior to inhalation of salmeterol or placebo and 1 and 12 h after. Baseline forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) increased significantly after salmeterol, both after the first dose and at 4 weeks (BD group: 19 and 17%; ICS: 22 and 13%). On the first day of administration, salmeterol provided significant protection in both groups up to 12 h with a PC20 before and 1 and 12 h postdose of 2.2, 21.7 and 12.4, mg x mL(-1), respectively, in the BD group and 2.1, 11.6 and 55 mg x mL(-1), respectively, in the ICS group. After 4 weeks, this effect was significantly attenuated in both groups with a PC20 before, 1 and 12 h postdose of 3.3, 10.9 and 7.1 mg x mL(-1), respectively, in the BD group and 2.1, 5.0 and 2.3 mg x mL(-1), respectively, in the ICS group. This loss of protective effect was of similar magnitude in both groups. Respiratory symptoms, rescue beta2-agonist use and baseline FEV1 did not change significantly throughout the study in both groups. In conclusion, the bronchoprotective effect of salmeterol decreased with regular use both 1 and 12 h postdose; inhaled corticosteroids did not prevent this reduction. However, the development of tolerance was not associated with loss of asthma control.     

Montelukast, a potent leukotriene receptor antagonist, causes dose-related improvements in chronic asthma. Montelukast Asthma Study Group

The leukotrienes are known to be important mediators of bronchial asthma. The ability of montelukast, a potent and selective CysLT1 leukotriene receptor antagonist, to cause a dose-related improvement in chronic asthma was investigated in a placebo-controlled, multicentre, parallel-group study. After a two week placebo run-in period, chronic asthmatic patients with a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 40-80% predicted with > or = 15% increase (absolute value) after beta2-agonist were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups (placebo or montelukast 2, 10, or 50 mg once daily in the evening) for a three week, double-blind treatment period. For patient-reported end-points (daytime symptom score, use of as needed inhaled beta2 agonist, asthma-specific quality of life) and frequency of asthma exacerbations, montelukast 10 and 50 mg caused similar responses, superior to 2 mg and significantly (p<0.05; linear trend test) different from placebo. All three doses caused improvements in FEV1 and morning and evening peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) that were significantly (p<0.05) different from placebo. Differences (least square mean) between the pooled 10 and 50 mg montelukast treatment groups and placebo were: 7.1% change from baseline in FEV1, 19.23 L x min(-1) in morning PEFR, -0.29 in daytime asthma symptom score (absolute value), and -0.82 in beta2-agonist use (puff x day(-1)). The incidence of adverse experiences was neither dose-related nor different between montelukast and placebo treatments. We conclude that montelukast causes a dose-related improvement in patient-reported asthma end-points over the range 2-50 mg. Montelukast causes benefit to chronic asthmatic patients by improving asthma control end-points.     

Potential masking effects of salmeterol on airway inflammation in asthma

We hypothesized that regular use of long-acting beta-agonists could delay recognition of ("mask") increasing airway inflammation. We studied steroid-sparing and "masking" effects of salmeterol versus placebo in 13 asthmatic individuals requiring >= 1,500 microgram inhaled corticosteroid daily. Corticosteroid doses were reduced weekly until criteria were met for an exacerbation or the corticosteroid was fully withdrawn. Subjects were restabilized on their original dose of inhaled corticosteroid for 4 wk before crossover to the alternative treatment. Subjects maintained symptom and peak expiratory flow (PEF) diaries, and underwent weekly spirometric, methacholine challenge, sputum eosinophil, and serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) measurements. Mean corticosteroid dose was reduced by 87% during salmeterol treatment, versus 69% with placebo (p = 0.04). Sputum eosinophils increased before exacerbation despite stable symptoms, FEV1, and PEF. In the week before clinical exacerbation, sputum eosinophil counts were higher in the salmeterol-treatment arm (19.9 +/- 29.8% [mean +/- SD], versus placebo 9.3 +/- 17.6%; p = 0.006). Five subjects showed > 10% sputum eosinophilia before exacerbation during salmeterol treatment, as compared with two receiving placebo. In this model, salmeterol controlled symptoms and lung function until inflammation became significantly more advanced. We conclude that the bronchodilating and symptom-relieving effects of salmeterol can mask increasing inflammation and delay awareness of worsening asthma.     

Salmeterol: a novel, long-acting beta 2-agonist

OBJECTIVE: The clinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and adverse effects of the long-acting beta 2-agonist salmeterol are reviewed. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search was performed to identify English-language publications pertaining to salmeterol. STUDY SELECTION: Open and controlled trials were reviewed in assessing clinical efficacy. Only the results of controlled, randomized trials were considered in the effectiveness evaluation. DATA EXTRACTION: The primary measures of effectiveness in the clinical trials were bronchodilator activity and reduction of hyperresponsiveness that may reflect antiinflammatory activity. Bronchodilator activity was measured as changes in pulmonary function; reduction of hyperresponsiveness was evaluated using respiratory challenge with methacholine, histamine, allergen, or cold air. Secondary measures included symptom scores, need for rescue doses, and patient preference. DATA SYNTHESIS: Salmeterol is a selective, beta 2-agonist that has been studied in the treatment of exercise-induced, nocturnal, and allergen-induced asthma. Salmeterol interacts with the traditional beta-receptor in a similar manner as other beta-agonists, and it exhibits potent in vitro antiinflammatory effects as an inhibitor of inflammatory mediator release. Less evidence exists for its in vivo antiinflammatory activity. Salmeterol demonstrates prolonged receptor occupancy, which is thought to contribute to its long duration of action. The recommended dose is 50 micrograms via metered-dose inhaler or dry-powdered inhalation. In the published clinical trials, salmeterol was more effective than albuterol in treating asthma, including exercise and allergen-induced asthma. Salmeterol's major advantage over other inhaled beta-agonists is its long duration of action (12 hours), making it an excellent choice for treatment of nocturnal asthma. A potential disadvantage is delayed onset of action. Tachyphylaxis to salmeterol's bronchodilator effects has not been shown, but tolerance to its protective effects against methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction has occurred. Adverse effects reported have been mild and have included headache, tremor, and palpitations. CONCLUSIONS: Salmeterol is an effective beta 2-agonist in the treatment of asthma. However, several issues require further investigation regarding its long-term effects on disease control, significance of antiinflammatory activity, and role as a rescue medication.     

An inhaled steroid improves markers of airway inflammation in patients with mild asthma

Airway inflammation can be demonstrated in mildly asthmatic patients who are not treated with inhaled steroids. Current guidelines recommend that inhaled steroids should be introduced in mild asthmatics who use an inhaled beta2-agonist more than once daily. It was postulated that inhaled steroids can have anti-inflammatory effects in patients with even milder disease. The effect of 4 weeks of treatment with budesonide (800 microg twice daily by Turbohaler) was studied in 10 steroid-naive mildly asthmatic patients (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) = 96+/-1.4% predicted) who required an inhaled beta2-agonist less than one puff daily, in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover fashion. Spirometry, exhaled nitric oxide (NO), bronchial responsiveness (provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20)), and sputum induction were performed before and after each treatment period. Following budesonide treatment, there were significant improvements in FEV1, and PC20, in association with a significant reduction in the percentage of eosinophils in induced sputum. Exhaled NO levels tended towards reduction, but the change was nonsignificant. There were also nonsignificant reductions in sputum eosinophil cationic protein and tumour necrosis factor-alpha levels. In conclusion inhaled budesonide can lead to improvements in noninvasive markers of airway inflammation, in association with a small improvement in lung function, even in mildly asthmatic patients who require an inhaled beta2-agonist less than once daily. This suggests a potential benefit of inhaled corticosteroids, even in relatively asymptomatic asthma.     

Overnight protection by inhaled salmeterol on exercise-induced asthma in children

The main aim of the present study was to evaluate whether inhaled salmeterol given in the evening protected against exercise-induced asthma the next morning. Twenty three children (12 males and 11 females) with a mean age of 11 yrs and with exercise-induced asthma participated in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. The children inhaled salmeterol 25 micrograms, salmeterol 50 micrograms and placebo by Diskhaler at 10 p.m. on 3 separate days. Next morning, half of the children ran on a motor-driven treadmill for 6 min at submaximal load at 8 a.m. and the remainder at 10 a.m. Lung function was measured by maximal expiratory flow-volume loops before running, immediately after, and 3, 6, 10 and 15 min after running. The mean maximum reduction in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) after treadmill run was 34% before inclusion in the study. Mean maximum fall in FEV1 was significantly greater after placebo: 30% (23-36) 95% confidence interval) than after salmeterol 25 micrograms: 19% (12-23) or salmeterol 50 micrograms: 18% (12-25). In addition to the reduced postexercise bronchoconstriction, pre-exercise lung function (FEV1) was significantly higher both after salmeterol 25 micrograms: 2.4 L.s-1 (2.1-2.7) and salmeterol 50 micrograms: 2.5 L.s-1 (2.2-2.8) than after placebo: 2.2 L.s-1 (1.9-2.5). No significant differences in pre- and postexercise lung function were found between children tested at 8 or 10 a.m., or in relation to salmeterol dosage. Thus, inhaled salmeterol 25 and 50 micrograms offered similar overnight protection against exercise-induced asthma and improved baseline lung function in the morning as compared to placebo.     

Dose equivalence and bronchoprotective effects of salmeterol and salbutamol in asthma

BACKGROUND: Salbutamol is the most widely prescribed short acting beta 2 agonist and salmeterol is the first long acting inhaled beta 2 agonist. The dose equivalence of salmeterol and salbutamol is disputed. Estimates of weight-for-weight dose ratio have ranged from 1:2 to 1:16. A study was undertaken to clarify the true dose ratio. METHODS: The bronchoprotection afforded against repeated methacholine challenge by inhaled salmeterol 25 micrograms and 100 micrograms and salbutamol 100 micrograms and 400 micrograms was compared in a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, crossover trial. Subjects were 16 stable asthmatics with a baseline forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of > or = 65% predicted, screening concentration provoking a fall in FEV1 of 20% (PC20FEV1) of < or = 8mg/ml, and a shift in PC20FEV1 of more than two doubling concentration steps following inhalation of salbutamol 400 micrograms. On five separate occasions subjects underwent methacholine challenge before and 30 and 120 minutes after drug administration. PD20FEV1 was calculated for each challenge. FEV1 at 90 minutes after drug administration was also recorded. RESULTS: Bronchoprotection afforded by salmeterol was increased at 120 minutes compared with 30 minutes and protection by salbutamol was decreased. Protection by both doses of salmeterol was similar to salbutamol 100 micrograms at 30 minutes but significantly greater at 120 minutes. FEV1 at 90 minutes was significantly greater after salmeterol 100 micrograms than after placebo, but there were no other significant differences between treatments. Maximal observed protection was equivalent for salmeterol 100 micrograms and salbutamol 400 micrograms. CONCLUSIONS: The data are compatible with a weight-for-weight dose ratio for salmeterol:salbutamol of < or = 1:4.     

Respiratory symptoms, lung function tests, airway responsiveness, and bronchoalveolar lymphocyte subsets in B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia

A respiratory questionnaire was completed and spirometry, tests for lung volumes, diffusion capacity for CO, and methacholine bronchial challenge were performed in 24 outpatients with B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL), aged 44-79, presenting in different stages of their disease. In 10 patients, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid was also obtained. Ten of twenty-four patients had symptoms consistent with chronic bronchitis, unrelated both to smoking history and to the clinical stage. Abnormal values (< 2 SD) were found in 4 patients for total lung capacity (TLC), in 9 for vital capacity (VC), 8 for forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1), 11 for MEF50, 15 for MEF25 and in 7 for diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide. Seven of nineteen patients had PD20FEV1 at less than 1,600 micrograms of methacholine chloride. There was a significantly negative correlation between white blood cell count and VC (r = 0.41, P < 0.05). A positive correlation was found between PD20FEV1 and FEV1/VC (r = 0.61, P < 0.01). The mean and SEM for BAL cells/ml was 463 (71.8) x 10(3). No leukemic cells but a marked increase in T lymphocytes (32.5 +/- 7.8%) were found in BAL fluid. There were significantly negative correlations between the number of BAL CD3+ T lymphocytes and PD20FEV1 (r = 0.61, P < 0.05), and between the number of BAL CD8+ T lymphocytes and PD20FEV1 (r = 0.84, P < 0.01). In conclusion, patients with B-CLL have a high prevalence of respiratory symptoms, small airway dysfunction and CD8 "alveolitis" related to airway responsiveness; despite the well-known lung interstitial lymphocyte infiltration in B-CLL, leukemic cells are not found in BAL fluid.     

Proteins in uterine secretions of fertile and sterile patients using SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE)

The long-acting beta 2-agonist salmeterol has been shown in several in vitro studies to produce non-beta-mediated relaxant effects. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether these effects have any relevance in humans in vivo. Thirteen healthy individuals were studied in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study on five separate days. The subjects were pre-treated orally with either propranolol 400 mg in order to block beta-adrenoceptor mediated effects or placebo. Two hours after drug intake, three increasing doses of salmeterol (25 + 50 + 100 micrograms), salbutamol (100 + 200 + 400 micrograms) or placebo were given from matched meter dose inhalers at 1-h intervals between doses. Specific airway conductance (sGAW) was measured in a body plethysmograph at the beginning of the experiment and 30 and 60 min after each inhaled dose of the beta-agonists. Salmeterol and salbutamol produced the same maximal increase in sGAW and had the same area under the dose-response curves. Pre-treatment with propranolol totally inhibited the effect of both drugs. In conclusion, salmeterol at clinically used doses did not produce any non-beta-mediated bronchodilating effect in normal individuals, measured as sGAW. Salmeterol and salbutamol showed the same efficacy but salmeterol was four times more potent than salbutamol.     

An evaluative study of the short-term effects of once-daily, sustained-release theophylline on sleep in nocturnal asthmatics

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of once-daily, sustained-release theophylline on sleep patterns in nocturnal asthmatics. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomised, cross-over, placebocontrolled trial over 22 days. Seven-day period to establish therapeutic levels of theophylline (11.8 +/- 3 mg/l); 8-day cross-over period of 4 days' placebo or theophylline; 7-day baseline period. Electrophysiological sleep patterns, overnight bronchoconstriction and arterial O2 saturation monitored on nights 7, 11 and 15. SETTING: Sleep Laboratory, Medical School, University of the Witwatersrand. PATIENTS: Twelve volunteers who met the criteria for asthma, had previously used theophylline, were clinically stable and had a history of nocturnal awakenings caused by asthma were enrolled. OUTCOME MEASURES: Sleep-onset latency (SOL), within-sleep wakefulness (WSW), rapid eye movement sleep (REM), slow-wave sleep (SWS), peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and arterial oxygen saturation. RESULTS: SOL increased on theophylline--12 minutes (range 7-9 minutes) compared with placebo--6 minutes (range 3-11 minutes); WSW increased from 33 minutes (range 17-66 minutes) on placebo to 72 minutes (range 35-150 minutes) on theophylline. REM sleep was unaltered. SWS decreased in 10-12 patients, but this difference was not significant. Early morning PEFR was significantly better on theophylline in all study limbs. CONCLUSION: Our findings show that while once-daily, sustained-release theophylline improves bronchodilation in nocturnal asthmatics, it increases nocturnal wakefulness and decreases sleep efficiency during short-term treatment. This may, however, not be a long-term effect.     

Lymphocyte and eosinophil influx into alveolar tissue in nocturnal asthma

We have shown in nocturnal asthma that alveolar tissue eosinophils are increased at night as compared with the proximal airway, and that they correlate with the overnight decrement in lung function. As the CD4+ cell is thought to be the principal orchestrating cell in eosinophil recruitment, we evaluated its presence in the proximal and distal airways in nocturnal asthma. Eleven patients with nocturnal asthma (NA) and 10 patients with non-nocturnal asthma (NNA) underwent two bronchoscopies with proximal airway endobronchial and distal alveolar tissue transbronchial biopsy in a random order at 4:00 P.M. and at 4:00 A.M. separated by 1 wk. Immunohistochemical staining and morphometric analysis were used to determine the number of CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ cells and EG2+ eosinophils per mm2 in the epithelium, lamina propria, and alveolar tissue. At 4:00 A.M., the NA group had a significantly greater number of CD4+ cells in the alveolar tissue than the NNA group (9.8 cells/ mm2 [5.6-30.8, interquartile (IQ)] versus 1.5 cells/mm2 [0-6. 3, IQ], p = 0.04). Within the NA group, there were significantly greater numbers of CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, and EG2+ cells in the proximal airway lamina propria than in the distal airway at both 4:00 P.M. and 4:00 A.M. There were no differences within the epithelium between the groups at either time point. Only alveolar tissue, not airway tissue, CD4+ cells correlated inversely with the percentage predicted FEV1 at 4:00 A.M. (r = -0.68, p = 0.0018) and positively with the number of alveolar tissue EG2+ cells (r = 0.66, p = 0.01). These findings suggest that the CD4+ lymphocyte is increased in the alveolar tissue at night in nocturnal asthma as compared with non-nocturnal asthma.     

The effect of zardaverine, an inhibitor of phosphodiesterase isoenzymes III and IV, on endotoxin-induced airway changes in rats

Zardaverine is a novel phosphodiesterase III/IV inhibitor, developed as a potential therapeutic agent for asthma. In this study we evaluated the effect of zardaverine in an in vivo animal model of airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness. Endotoxin exposure in rats causes a transient increase in airway responsiveness and a neutrophilic inflammation of the bronchi, which are both at least partly mediated through the secondary release of tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha). Groups of 10 animals each were pretreated with placebo or zardaverine (1, 10, 30 mumol/kg) i.p., 30 min prior to exposure to aerosolized endotoxin (LPS) or saline. Ninety minutes later, airway responsiveness to 5-HT was assessed and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) performed. Zardaverine did not influence baseline lung resistance (RL), but inhibited dose dependently the 5-HT induced increase in RL in control animals. In placebo pretreated animals LPS exposure caused a significant decrease in PC50RL5-HT (provocative concentration of 5-HT causing a 50% increase in RL), compared to the saline exposed control group (1.1 +/- 0.1 vs 2.7 +/- 0.4 micrograms/kg) (P < 0.01). This decrease in PC50RL5-HT was significantly inhibited by zardaverine 30 mumol/kg (5.4 +/- 1.8 vs 1.1 +/- 0.1 micrograms/kg) (P < 0.05). Compared to placebo pre-treated, LPS exposed animals, zardaverine 30 mumol/kg also significantly inhibited to LPS induced neutrophil increase (193.0 +/- 50.0 vs 915.6 +/- 181.3 x 10(3)) (P < 0.01), increase in elastase activity (23 +/- 11 vs 54 +/- 9 nmol substrate/h/ml) (P < 0.05) and TNF alpha release in BAL fluid (93.1 +/- 19.5 vs 229.5 +/- 24.8 U/ml BAL fluid) (P < 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Treatment of nocturnal asthma with nedocromil sodium

BACKGROUND: The association of nocturnal asthma symptoms with a diurnal increase in inflammatory activity suggests a role for anti-inflammatory therapy in nocturnal asthma. METHODS: Fifty patients with asthma with nocturnal symptoms entered a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, crossover study. After a two week baseline period patients received nedocromil sodium (4 mg) or placebo four times daily. After eight weeks of treatment patients crossed to the alternative treatment for a further eight weeks. Symptom severity was recorded on a scale of 0-4 and inhaled bronchodilator use and peak flow (PEFR) were also recorded daily by the patients. Asthma severity, pulmonary function (FEV1, PEFR, FVC), and adverse events were recorded at clinic visits (baseline and after four and eight weeks of treatment). Global effectiveness was rated by clinician and patient, and treatment preference was recorded. RESULTS: Efficacy was assessed from data from 28 patients. Night-time asthma (mean (SE) difference between nedocromil sodium and placebo: -0.52 (0.13)), total nocturnal symptom severity defined as night-time asthma plus morning tightness (-0.72 (0.20)), and night-time bronchodilator use (-0.62 (0.23)) were reduced with nedocromil sodium compared with placebo treatment during the primary efficacy period (weeks 5-8) and during weeks 1-4 (-0.36 (0.12), -0.63 (0.20), and -0.55 (0.28), respectively). Morning and evening PEFR values improved slightly--but not significantly--compared with placebo. Patient and clinician opinions favoured nedocromil sodium treatment. Daytime asthma, daytime cough, and clinic assessment of asthma severity (secondary efficacy variables) were improved with nedocromil sodium treatment; day-time bronchodilator use and clinic pulmonary function were not. CONCLUSIONS: Nedocromil sodium was more effective than placebo in reducing nocturnal symptoms of asthma and bronchodilator use in this group of patients.     

The effect of nedocromil sodium on the clinical course, ventilatory parameters and nonspecific bronchial hyperreactivity in patients with nonatopic bronchial asthma treated with beclomethasone dipropionate

The efficacy of nedocromil sodium (NED) (8mg twice daily) in controlling the clinical symptoms of asthma (score symptoms), the pulmonary parameters (FEV1, FVC) and bronchial hyperreactivity to histamine was assessed. The study was performed in double-blind, cross-over and placebo-controlled way in 16 patients suffering from nonatopic, stable, moderate asthma treated with beclomethasone dipropionate (from 400 micrograms to 800 micrograms). NED and placebo were administered in a randomized way with 8-week wash-out period. Bronchial reactivity to histamine, was measured as the amount of histamine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20H in mg/ml). Treatment with NED did not change asthma symptom scores, FVC and FEV1. Decreased usage of beta 2-agonist was observed. NED did not influence bronchial hyperreactivity to histamine (xg PC20H was respectively 0.09 and 0.11 mg/ml after placebo and 0.06 and 0.08 after NED). The authors conclude that studies with NED in nonatopic asthmatics should be continued, but the dosage of the drug ought to be bigger and the time of treatment ought to be longer.     

Effect of long-term treatment with salmeterol on asthma control: a double blind, randomised crossover study

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of adding salmeterol 50 micrograms twice daily for six months to current treatment in subjects with asthma who control their inhaled corticosteroid dose according to a management plan. DESIGN: A double blind, randomised crossover study. SETTING: Nottingham. SUBJECTS: 101 subjects with mild or moderate asthma taking at least 200 micrograms twice daily of beclomethasone dipropionate or budesonide. INTERVENTIONS: Salmeterol 50 micrograms twice daily and placebo for six months each, with a one month washout. Subjects adjusted inhaled steroid dose according to guidelines. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Reduction in inhaled steroid use, exacerbations of asthma, and use of oral steroids. RESULTS: Data were available for 87 subjects. When compared with placebo salmeterol treatment was associated with a 17% reduction in inhaled steroid use (95% confidence interval 12% to 22%) with no significant difference in the number of subjects who had an exacerbation (placebo 25%, salmeterol 16%) or use of oral steroids. For secondary end points salmeterol treatment was associated with higher morning and evening peak expiratory flow and forced expiratory volume in one second; a reduction in symptoms, bronchodilator use and airway responsiveness to methacholine; and no effect on serum potassium concentration, 24 hour heart rate, or the final forced expiratory volume in one second achieved during a salbutamol dose-response study. CONCLUSIONS: In subjects who adjusted their inhaled steroid treatment according to guidelines the addition of salmeterol 50 micrograms twice daily was associated with a reduction in inhaled steroid use and improved lung function and symptom control.     

Relaxin activates the L-arginine-nitric oxide pathway in vascular smooth muscle cells in culture

The effects of usual or low doses of inhaled corticosteroids on airway mucosal inflammation have not yet been examined. We therefore, compared the effects of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 336 microg x day(-1) on asthma control outcomes and markers of airway inflammation. Twenty-four adult subjects with mild and moderate asthma were randomized to receive either BDP or placebo for four weeks; then subjects entered a single blind four week placebo run-in period. We found that the BDP group had significantly greater improvements in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), morning peak flow, and rescue salbutamol use than the placebo-treated group. The improvement in FEV1 largely reversed one week after treatment was stopped. The decrease in the median percentage of eosinophils in induced sputum in the BDP group from 3.8% to 3.4% was not significant, but because eosinophils increased from 8.4% to 12.7% in the placebo group, there was a significant difference between treatment groups (p=0.03). There was no significant difference between groups during treatment in the levels of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), tryptase mucin-like glycoprotein, or fibrinogen in induced sputum. The change in FEV1 in the BDP group did not correlate significantly with the change in eosinophil percentage or ECP levels. We concluded that four weeks of treatment with inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate 336 microg x day(-1) was associated with significant improvements in peak flow, forced expiratory volume in one second, and rescue salbutamol use in asthmatic subjects but was not associated with large reductions in markers of eosinophilic inflammation, bronchovascular permeability, or mucus hypersecretion.