Vasodepressor actions of angiotensin-(1-7) unmasked during combined treatment with lisinopril and losartan

Blockade of angiotensin II (Ang II) function during 8 days of oral therapy with lisinopril (20 mg/kg) and losartan (10 mg/kg) normalized the arterial pressure (112+/-3/70+/-3 mm Hg) and raised the plasma concentrations of the vasodilator peptide angiotensin-(1-7) [Ang-(1-7)] of 21 male spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). Treated animals were then given a 15-minute infusion of either mouse immunoglobulin G1 or a specific monoclonal Ang-(1-7) antibody while their blood pressure and heart rate were recorded continuously in the awake state. The concentrations of Ang II and Ang-(1-7) in arterial blood were determined by radioimmunoassay. Infusion of the Ang-(1-7) antibody caused significant elevations in mean arterial pressure that were sustained for the duration of the infusion and were accompanied by transient bradycardia. Although the hemodynamic effects produced by infusion of the Ang-(1-7) antibody had no effect on plasma levels of Ang II, they caused a twofold rise in the plasma concentrations of Ang-(1-7). A pressor response of similar magnitude and characteristics was obtained in a separate group of SHR treated with the combination of lisinopril and losartan for 8 days during an infusion of [Sar1-Thr8]Ang II. The pressor response induced by the administration of this competitive, non-subtype-selective Ang II receptor blocker was not modified by pretreatment of the rats with an angiotensin type-2 (AT2) receptor blocker (PD123319). Plasma concentrations of Ang II and Ang-(1-7) were not changed by the administration of [Sar1-Thr8]Ang II either in the absence or in the presence of PD123319 pretreatment. These results are the first to indicate an important contribution of Ang-(1-7) in mediating the vasodilator effects caused by combined inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme and AT1 receptors. The comparable results obtained by administration of [Sar1-Thr8]Ang II suggest that the vasodepressor effects of Ang-(1-7) during the combined treatment is modulated by a non-AT1/AT2 angiotensin subtype receptor.     

Effect of selective angiotensin antagonists on the antidiuresis produced by angiotensin-(1-7) in water-loaded rats

In the present study we evaluated the nature of angiotensin receptors involved in the antidiuretic effect of angiotensin-(1-7) (Ang-(1-7)) in water-loaded rats. Water diuresis was induced in male Wistar rats weighing 280 to 320 g by water load (5 ml/100 g body weight by gavage). Immediately after water load the rats were treated subcutaneously with (doses are per 100 g body weight): 1) vehicle (0.05 ml 0.9% NaCl); 2) graded doses of 20, 40 or 80 pmol Ang-(1-7); 3) 200 nmol Losartan; 4) 200 nmol Losartan combined with 40 pmol Ang-(1-7); 5) 1.1 or 4.4 nmol A-779; 6) 1.1 nmol A-779 combined with graded doses of 20, 40 or 80 pmol Ang-(1-7); 7) 4.4 nmol A-779 combined with graded doses of 20, 40 or 80 pmol Ang-(1-7); 8) 95 nmol CGP 42112A, or 9) 95 nmol CGP 42112A combined with 40 pmol Ang-(1-7). The antidiuretic effect of Ang-(1-7) was associated with an increase in urinary Na+ concentration, an increase in urinary osmolality and a reduction in creatinine clearance (CCr: 0.65 +/- 0.04 ml/min vs 1.45 +/- 0.18 ml/min in vehicle-treated rats, P < 0.05). A-779 and Losartan completely blocked the effect of Ang-(1-7) on water diuresis (2.93 +/- 0.34 ml/60 min and 3.39 +/- 0.58 ml/60 min, respectively). CGP 42112A, at the dose used, did not modify the antidiuretic effect of Ang-(1-7). The blockade produced by Losartan was associated with an increase in CCr and with an increase in sodium and water excretion as compared with Ang-(1-7)-treated rats. When Ang-(1-7) was combined with A-779 there was an increase in CCr and natriuresis and a reduction in urine osmolality compared with rats treated with Ang-(1-7) alone. The observation that both A-779, which does not bind to AT1 receptors, and Losartan blocked the effect of Ang-(1-7) suggests that the kidney effects of Ang-(1-7) are mediated by a non-AT1 angiotensin receptor that is recognized by Losartan.     

7-D-ALA]-angiotensin 1-7 blocks renal actions of angiotensin 1-7 in the anesthetized rat

Exogenous angiotensin (Ang) 1-7 affects renal function, but the receptor(s) involved in this response remain(s) to be determined. In an in vitro preparation of proximal tubules, Ang 1-7 was shown to act on Ang II AT1 receptors (minor component), but also on a non-AT1, non-AT2 Ang receptor (major component) to inhibit reabsorption. In brain, Ang 1-7 also exerts effects mediated by a non-AT1, non-AT2 binding site; these effects are inhibited, however, by the angiotensin analog [7-D-Ala]-Ang 1-7. Therefore we tested the effect of Ang II AT1-receptor antagonist losartan and [7-D-Ala]-Ang 1-7 on the renal response to exogenous Ang 1-7 in standard renal-clearance experiments in the anesthetized rat. We found that Ang 1-7 (100 pmol/kg/min, i.a.) increased glomerular filtration rate (GFR), urinary flow rate (UV), and urinary sodium excretion (UNaV) without affecting mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) or urinary potassium excretion (UKV), confirming previous reports. Losartan (10 mg/kg, i.v.) blocked the pressor effect of exogenous Ang II (100 pmol/kg/min, i.a.), but did not significantly affect the renal response to Ang 1-7. Conversely, pretreatment with [7-D-Ala]-Ang 1-7 (5 nmol/kg/min) did not affect the pressor effect of Ang II, but abolished the renal response to Ang 1-7. Application of [7-D-Ala]-Ang 1-7 in the absence of exogenous Ang 1-7 did not alter MAP or GFR, but increased UNaV (by 52%). Our data indicate that similar to the response in brain, the renal response to exogenous Ang 1-7 may be mediated predominantly by a distinct non-AT1 binding site, which is sensitive to blockade by [7-D-Ala]-Ang 1-7. Furthermore, ambient endogenous Ang 1-7 acting on this distinct binding site may not contribute significantly to control of MAP or GFR, but exerts an antinatriuretic influence in the anesthetized rat.     

Angiotensin III and IV activation of the brain AT1 receptor subtype in cardiovascular function

The present investigation determined that native angiotensins II and III (ANG II and III) were equipotent as pressor agents when ICV infused in alert rats, whereas native angiotensin IV (ANG IV) was less potent. An analogue of each of these angiotensins was prepared with a hydroxyethylamine (HEA) amide bond replacement at the N-terminus, yielding additional resistance to degradation. These three angiotensin analogues, HEA-ANG II, HEA-ANG III, and HEA-ANG IV, were equivalent with respect to maximum elevation in pressor responses when ICV infused; and each evidenced significantly extended durations of effect compared with their respective native angiotensin. Comparing analogues, HEA-ANG II had a significantly longer effect compared with HEA-ANG III, and HEA-ANG IV, whereas the latter were equivalent. Pretreatment with the AT1 receptor subtype antagonist, Losartan (DuP753), blocked subsequent pressor responses to each of these analogues, suggesting that these responses were mediated by the AT1 receptor subtype. Pretreatment with the specific AT4 receptor subtype antagonist, Divalinal (HED 1291), failed to influence pressor responses induced by the subsequent infusion of these analogues. These results suggest an important role for Ang III, and perhaps ANG IV, in brain angiotensin pressor responses mediated by the AT1 receptor subtype.     

Renal hemodynamics in the rat before and during inhibition of angiotensin II

Renal blood flow (RBF) was measured with a noncannulating electromagnetic flow transducer in anesthetized rats which had been maintained for 3-5 wk on low, normal, or high salt plus deoxycorticosterone diets. After base-line observations, one of two dissimilar inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system, angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibitor SQ 20881 or the structural analogue [Sar1,Ala8]angiotensin II was administered intravenously. The employed doses of SQ 20881 and [Sar1,Ala8]angiotensin II effectively inhibited the pressor and renal vasoconstrictor responses induced by exogenous angiotensin I and II, respectively, in each dietary group. Both inhibitors vasodilated kidneys in salt-restricted rats; however, neither affected base-line renal hemodynamics in salt-loaded rats. Pressure-flow relationships were evaluated by clamping the aorta to reduce renal perfusion pressure. Renal blood flow was autoregulated between 100 and 140 mmHg with the same efficiency before and during inhibition of angiotensin II in each dietary group. These data indicate that angiotensin II modifies base-line RBF and renal vascular resistance and are consistent with the view that the renin-angiotensin system is not an essential mechanism responsible for autoregulation of RBF in the rat.     

Angiotensin-(1-7): a bioactive fragment of the renin-angiotensin system

Accumulating evidence suggests that angiotensin-(1-7) [Ang-(1-7)] is an important component of the renin-angiotensin system. As the most pleiotropic metabolite of angiotensin I (Ang I) it manifest actions which are most often the opposite of those described for angiotensin II (Ang II). Ang-(1-7) is produced from Ang I bypassing the prerequisite formation of Ang II. The generation of Ang-(1-7) is under the control of at least three enzymes, which include neprilysin, thimet oligopeptidase, and prolyl oligopeptidase depending on the tissue compartment. Both neprilysin and thimet oligopeptidase are also involved in the metabolism of bradykinin and the atrial natriuretic peptide. Moreover, recent studies suggest that in addition to Ang I and bradykinin, Ang-(1-7) is an endogenous substrate for angiotensin converting enzyme. This suggests that there is a complex relationship between the enzymatic pathways forming angiotensin II and other various vasodepressor peptides from either the renin-angiotensin system or other peptide systems. The antihypertensive actions of angiotensin-(1-7) are mediated by an angiotensin receptor that is distinct from the pharmacologically characterized AT1 or AT2 receptor subtypes. Ang-(1-7) mediates it antihypertensive effects by stimulating synthesis and release of vasodilator prostaglandins, and nitric oxide and potentiating the hypotensive effects of bradykinin.     

Chemical lesion of the inferior olive reduces [125I]sarcosine1-angiotensin II binding to AT2 receptors in the cerebellar cortex of young rats

In young rats, AT2 receptors and AT2 receptor mRNA are discretely localized in neurons of the inferior olive, with highest expression in the medial nucleus. We previously detected AT2 receptor binding, but not AT2 receptor mRNA, in the molecular layer of the cerebellar cortex. To determine whether AT2 receptors are expressed in climbing fiber terminals which arise to the molecular layer from the inferior olive and innervate Purkinje cells, we chemically destroyed olivary neurons of 2-week-old rats by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of the neurotoxin 3-acetylpyridine. Lesions of the inferior olive reduced [125I]Sar1-Ang II binding to AT2 receptors and AT2 receptor mRNA levels in this area by 50%, and produced a similar decrease in AT2 receptor binding in the molecular layer of the cerebellar cortex. The extent of binding reduction was similar 3 days and 7 days after the lesion. 3-Acetylpyridine lesions did not change [125I]Sar1-Ang II binding to AT1 receptors in the molecular layer of the cerebellar cortex or AT1 receptor mRNA levels in Purkinje cells. AT2 receptor binding and AT2 receptor mRNA levels in the deep cerebellar nuclei were also not affected by 3-acetylpyridine. Our results support the hypothesis that AT2 receptors are produced by inferior olivary neurons and transported through climbing fibers to the molecular layer of the cerebellar cortex. The high expression of AT2 receptors in the inferior olivary-cerebellar pathway during a crucial time in postnatal development of climbing fiber-Purkinje cell connectivity suggest a role of AT2 receptors in the development of this pathway.     

Inhibition of sympathetic outflow by the angiotensin II receptor antagonist, eprosartan, but not by losartan, valsartan or irbesartan: relationship to differences in prejunctional angiotensin II receptor blockade

It is well established that angiotensin II can enhance sympathetic nervous system function by activating prejunctional angiotensin II type I (AT1) receptors located on sympathetic nerve terminals. Stimulation of these receptors enhances stimulus-evoked norepinephrine release, leading to increased activation of vascular alpha 1-adrenoceptors and consequently to enhanced vasoconstriction. In the present study, the effects of several chemically distinct nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonists were evaluated on pressor responses evoked by activation of sympathetic outflow through spinal cord stimulation in the pithed rat. Stimulation of thoracolumbar sympathetic outflow in pithed rats produced frequency-dependent pressor responses. Infusion of sub-pressor doses of angiotensin II (40 ng/kg/min) shifted leftward the frequency-response curves for increases in blood pressure, indicating augmented sympathetic outflow. Furthermore, pressor responses resulting in spinal cord stimulation were inhibited by the peptide angiotensin II receptor antagonist, Sar1, Ile8 [angiotensin II] (10 micrograms/kg/min). These results confirm the existence of prejunctional angiotensin II receptors at the vascular neuroeffector junction that facilitate release of norepinephrine. The nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonist, eprosartan (0.3 mg/kg i.v.), inhibited the pressor response induced by spinal cord stimulation in a manner similar to that observed with the peptide antagonist, Sar1, Ile8[angiotensin II]. In contrast, equivalent doses (0.3 mg/kg i.v.) of other nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonists, such as losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan, had no effect on spinal cord stimulation of sympathetic outflow in the pithed rat. Although the mechanism by which eprosartan, but not the other nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonists, inhibits sympathetic outflow in the pithed rat is unknown, one possibility is that eprosartan is a more effective antagonist of prejunctional angiotensin II receptors that augment neurotransmitter release. Because eprosartan is more effective in inhibiting sympathetic nervous system activity compared to other chemically distinct nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonists, eprosartan may be more effective in lowering systolic blood pressure and in treating isolated systolic hypertension.     

The role of angiotensin AT1 receptors in the diuretic, natriuretic, kaliuretic and blood pressure responses induced by angiotensin II activation of the median preoptic nucleus in conscious rats

We determined the effects of two classical angiotensin II (ANG II) antagonists, [Sar1, Ala8]-ANG II and [Sar1, Thr8]-ANG II, and losartan (a nonpeptide and selective antagonist for the AT1 angiotensin receptors) on diuresis, natriuresis, kaliuresis and arterial blood pressure induced by ANG II administration into the median preoptic nucleus (MnPO) of male Holtzman rats weighing 250-300 g. Urine was collected in rats submitted to a water load (5% body weight) 1 h later. The volume of the drug solutions injected was 0.5 microliters over 10-15 s. Pre-treatment with [Sar1, Ala8]-ANG II (12 rats) and [Sar1, Thr8]-ANG II (9 rats), at the dose of 60 ng reduced (13.7 +/- 1.0 vs 11.0 +/0 1.0 and 10.7 +/0 1.2, respectively), whereas losartan (14 rats) at the dose of 160 ng totally blocked (13.7 +/- 1.0 vs 7.6 +/- 1.5) the urine excretion induced by injection o 12 ng of ANG II (14 rats). [Sar1, Ala8]-ANG II impaired Na+ excretion (193 +/- 16 vs 120 +/- 19), whereas [Sar1, Thr8]-ANG II and losartan block Na+ excretion (193 +/- 16 vs 77 +/- 15 and 100 +/- 12, respectively) induced by ANG II. Similar effects induced by ANG II on K+ excretion were observed with [Sar1, Ala8]-ANG II, [Sar1, Thr8]- ANG II, and losartan pretreatment (133 +/- 18 vs 108 +/- 11, 80 +/- 12, and 82 +/- 15, respectively). The same doses as above of [Sar1, Ala8]-ANG II (8 rats), [Sar1, Thr8]-ANG II (8 rats), and losartan (9 rats) blocked the increase in the arterial blood pressure induced by 12 ng of ANG II (12 rats) (32 +/- 4 vs 4 +/- 2, 3.5 +/- 1, and 2 +/- 1, respectively. The results indicate that the AT1 receptor subtype participates in the increases of diuresis, natriuresis, kaliuresis and arterial blood pressure induced by the administration of ANG II into the MnPO.     

Renal vascular responses to angiotensin II in conscious spontaneously hypertensive and normotensive rats

It has been postulated that exaggerated renal sensitivity to angiotensin II may be involved in the development and maintenance of hypertension in the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR). The purpose of this study was to compare the renal vascular responses to short-term angiotensin II infusions (50 ng/kg/min, i.v.) in conscious SHRs and Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats. Renal cortical blood flow was measured in conscious rats by using quantitative renal perfusion imaging by magnetic resonance, and blood pressure was measured by an indwelling carotid catheter attached to a digital blood pressure analyzer. Renal vascular responses to angiotensin II were similar in control SHRs and WKY rats. Pretreatment with captopril to block endogenous production of angiotensin II significantly augmented the renal vascular response to exogenous angiotensin II in the SHRs but not in the WKY rats. The renal vascular responses to angiotensin II were significantly greater in captopril-pretreated SHRs than in WKY rats (cortical blood flow decreased by 1.66 +/- 0.13 ml/min/g cortex in WKY rats compared with 2.15 +/- 0.14 ml/min/g cortex in SHR; cortical vascular resistance increased by 10.5 +/- 1.4 mm Hg/ml/min/g cortex in WKY rats compared with 15.6 +/- 1.7 mm Hg/ml/min/g cortex in SHRs). Responses to angiotensin II were completely blocked in both strains by pretreatment with the angiotensin II AT1-receptor antagonist losartan. Results from this study in conscious rats confirm previous findings in anesthetized rats that (a) the short-term pressor and renal vascular responses to angiotensin II are mediated by the AT1 receptor in both SHRs and WKY rats, and (b) the renal vascular responses to angiotensin II are enhanced in SHRs compared with WKY rats when endogenous production of angiotensin II is inhibited by captopril pretreatment.     

Increased pressor function of central vasopressinergic system in hypertensive renin transgenic rats

OBJECTIVE: Renin transgenic hypertensive rats [TGR(mRen2)27] have increased contents of angiotensin II and arginine vasopressin (AVP) in the cardiovascular brain regions. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of centrally released AVP on the regulation of baseline blood pressure in TGR(mRen2)27 rats and to determine the interaction between AVP and angiotensin II in the central control of blood pressure in this model of hypertension. DESIGN: Three basic series of experiments were performed on 20 TGR(mRen2)27 and 20 Hannover Sprague-Dawley conscious rats, chronically instrumented with lateral cerebral ventricle (LCV) cannulae and femoral artery catheters. In series 1, blood pressure and heart rate were recorded during an LCV infusion of artificial cerebrospinal fluid before and after LCV administration of angiotensin II. In series 2, the effects of an LCV administration of angiotensin 11 (100 ng) on mean arterial pressure and the heart rate were determined during LCV infusion of a selective AVP receptor (V1) antagonist [1-(1-mercapto-4-methylcyclohexaneacetic acid)-8-arginine vasopressin (MeCAAVP) and d(CH2)5[Tyr(Me)2,Ala-NH2(9)]AVP] or a selective angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist (losartan) or both. In series 3, mean arterial pressure and the heart rate were determined after an LCV injection of either AVP (10 ng) or AVP together with angiotensin II. RESULTS: The LCV infusions of antagonists to V1 and AT1 receptors caused significant comparable decreases in baseline MAP in TGR(mRen2)27 but not in Sprague-Dawley rats. Angiotensin II elicited significant pressor responses, both in TGR(mRen2)27 and in Sprague-Dawley rats. Blockade of V1 receptors significantly reduced the duration and the maximum amplitude of the central pressor response to angiotensin II in TGR(mRen2)27 rats, whereas in Sprague-Dawley rats the maximum pressor effect was not significantly altered. In both strains, the pressor response to angiotensin II was abolished by blockade of AT1 receptors. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the elevated blood pressure in TGR(mRen2)27 rats is partly caused by increased function of the brain angiotensinergic AT1 and vasopressinergic V1 systems. Centrally released AVP is involved in mediation of the pressor effect exerted by centrally applied angiotensin II in TGR(mRen2)27 rats.     

In vivo pharmacology of an angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonist with balanced affinity for AT2 receptors

L-163,017 (6-[benzoylamino]-7-methyl-2-propyl-3-[[2'-(N-(3-methyl-1-butoxy) carbonylaminosulfonyl)[1,1']-biphenyl-4-yl]methyl]-3H-imidazo[4,5- b]pyridine) is a potent, orally active, nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonist. Conscious rats and dogs were dosed p.o. and i.v.; in both species the plasma bioequivalents are similar at the angiotensin AT1 and AT2 receptor sites indicating balanced activity is maintained in vivo. L-163,017 prevents the pressor response to intravenous (i.v.) angiotensin II in the conscious rat, dog, and rhesus monkey. L-163,017 also significantly reduces blood pressure in a renin-dependent model of hypertension, similar to an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (Enalapril) and an angiotensin AT1 receptor-selective antagonist (L-159,282). These studies indicate that neither the angiotensin AT2 receptor nor bradykinin is important in the acute antihypertensive activity of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor antagonists.     

Localization of AT2 angiotensin II receptor gene expression in rat brain by in situ hybridization histochemistry

To localize the gene expression of AT2 angiotensin II receptors in rat brain we performed in situ hybridization histochemistry using 35S-labeled antisense riboprobes. The AT2 receptor mRNA expression pattern was compared in consecutive brain sections, from 2 week old rats, with the receptor expression by means of [125I]Sar1-ANG II binding and displacement with AT2 selective ligands followed by autoradiography. Expression of AT2 receptor mRNA was found in several thalamic nuclei (ventral posterolateral, mediodorsal, central medial, paracentral, and paraventricular), the medial geniculate nuclei, the nucleus of the optic tract, the subthalamic nucleus, the interposed nucleus of the cerebellum, and in the inferior olive. In these areas the AT2 receptor gene expression corresponds well with [125I]Sar1-ANG II binding. In addition, AT2 receptor mRNA expression was found in the red nucleus where no [125I]Sar1-ANG II binding was present. No significant hybridization of the AT2 receptor antisense probe was found in septal nuclei, the locus coeruleus, the dorsolateral geniculate nucleus, or the cerebellar cortex, areas rich in [125I]Sar1-ANG II binding. Our results indicate that some brain regions may be involved in AT2 receptor formation, transporting the receptor protein to other brain areas. However, in most structures, both the formation and expression of receptors occur, suggesting the existence of local AT2 receptor circuits, or that of AT2 autoreceptors. Other structures express only the receptor protein, indicating that these AT2 receptors are produced elsewhere. Our present data are the basis for further studies on the clarification of AT2 receptor pathways in the brain.     

An inhibitor of lymphocyte proliferation produced by a human colonic adenocarcinoma cell line in culture

1. The relative ability of the renal and femoral vascular beds to remove infused angiotensin II and noradrenaline was examined in anaesthetized greyhounds. 2. The degree of extraction of infused drug by each vascular bed was expressed as a percentage, calculated by comparing the pressor response to intra-arterial infusion with that obtained when the same dose was administered by the intravenous route. 3. When compared with the same dose given intravenously, the pressor responses after renal artery administration of angiotensin II were reduced by a mean of 77.8 +/- 4.1% (mean +/- SEM, n = 12), whereas those after femoral artery infusions at the same dose were reduced by a mean of only 27.2 +/- 4.9% (n = 12). 4. The pattern of extraction seen with noradrenaline infusions administered in a similar manner was the reverse of that with angiotensin II. There was a 28.9 +/- 6.8% (n = 7) reduction in pressor responses to renal artery infusions; in contrast, femoral artery infusions of the same dose exhibited a 99.0 +/- 1.0% (n = 7) reduction in the pressor responses. 5. Local arterial administration of the angiotensin II competitive antagonist, [Sar1,Ile8]angiotensin II, potentiated the systemic pressor responses to renal artery infusions of angiotensin II, but not those to femoral artery infusions. 6. It is suggested that the marked ability of the renal vascular bed to remove circulating angiotensin II may, in part, involve receptor-binding, although this seems not to be the case in the femoral vascular bed.     

The accuracy of mothers'' reports of child vaccination: evidence from rural Egypt

Accumulating evidence suggests that angiotensin-(1-7)(Ang-(1-7)) is an important component of the renin-angiotensin system and that the actions of the peptide may either contribute to or oppose those of Ang II. Ang-(1-7) can be converted directly from Ang I bypassing prerequisite formation of Ang II. Formation of Ang-(1-7) is under the control of at least three endopeptidases depending on the tissue compartment and include neprilysin, thimet oligopeptidase and prolyl oligopeptidase. Both neprilysin and thimet oligopeptidase are also involved in the metabolism of bradykinin and the atrial natriuretic peptide. Moreover, recent studies suggest that in addition to Ang I and bradykinin, Ang-(1-7) is an endogenous substrate for angiotensin converting enzyme. These enzymatic pathways may contribute to a complex relationship between the hypertensive actions of Ang II and various vasodepressor peptides from either the renin-angiotensin system or other peptide systems. Ang-(1-7) is devoid of the vasoconstrictor, central pressor, or thirst-stimulating actions associated with Ang II. In fact, new findings reveal depressor, vasodilator, and antihypertensive actions that may be more apparent in hypertensive animals or humans. Thus, Ang-(1-7) may oppose the actions of Ang II directly or as a result of increasing prostaglandins or nitric oxide. In this review, we examine the mechanisms by which Ang-(1-7) may contribute to cardiovascular regulation.     

Angiotensin III-induced dipsogenic and pressor responses in rodents.

Three experiments examined responses to angiotensins in 64 male Sprague-Dawley rats, 64 male Mongolian gerbils, and 40 Octodon degus—a South American rodent. In Exp I, injections of [des-Asp–1]-angiotensin I ([des-Asp–1]-AI), angiotensin II (AII), and angiotensin III (AIII), at doses of .001–2 mg/kg (sc), induced drinking in the rat and degus, but not in the gerbil. In Exp II, pretreatment with captopril (50 mg/kg), an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, prevented the endogenous conversion of sc injected [des-Asp–1]-AI to AIII and prevented drinking in rats and degus. The pharmacological artifact of hypovolemia caused by angiotensin-induced increases in vascular permeability was not observed in members of these species. In Exp III, blood pressure changes resulting from injections of AII and AIII in rats and gerbils were measured. Significant pressor elevations were seen following the administration of both analogs, although AII was more potent. Results demonstrate that AIII is dipsogenic in rats and degus and serves as a pressor agent in rats and gerbils. No explanation was found for the gerbil's relative lack of dipsogenicity to the presently tested angiotensins. (54 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Signal transduction mechanisms involved in angiotensin-(1-7)-stimulated arachidonic acid release and prostanoid synthesis in rabbit aortic smooth muscle cells

This study investigated the signal transduction mechanisms of angiotensin-(1-7) [Ang-(1-7)]- and Ang II-stimulated arachidonic acid (AA) release for prostaglandin (PG) production in rabbit aortic vascular smooth muscle cells. Ang II and Ang-(1-7) enhanced AA release in cells prelabeled with [3H]AA. However, 6-keto-PGF1 alpha synthesis produced by Ang II was much less than that caused by Ang-(1-7). In the presence of the lipoxygenase inhibitor baicalein, Ang II enhanced production of 6-keto-PGF1 alpha to a greater degree than Ang-(1-7). Angiotensin type (AT)1 receptor antagonist DUP-753 inhibited only Ang II-induced [3H]AA release, whereas the AT2 receptor antagonist PD-123319 inhibited both Ang II- and Ang-(1-7)-induced [3H]AA release. Ang-(1-7), receptor antagonist D-Ala7-Ang-(1-7) inhibited the effect of Ang-(1-7), but not of Ang II. In cells transiently transfected with cytosolic phospholipase A2 (cPLA2), mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase or Ca(++)-/cal-modulin-dependent protein (CAM) kinase II antisense oligonucleotides, Ang-(1-7)- and Ang II-induced [3H]AA release was attenuated. The CaM kinase II inhibitor KN-93 and the MAP kinase kinase inhibitor PD-98059 attenuated both Ang-(1-7)- and Ang II-induced cPLA2 activity and [3H]AA release. Ang-(1-7) and Ang II also increased CaM kinase II and MAP kinase activities. Although KN-93 attenuated MAP kinase activity, PD-98059 did not affect CaM kinase II activity. Both Ang II and Ang-(1-7) caused translocation of cytosolic PLA2 to the nuclear envelope. These data show that Ang-(1-7) and Ang II stimulate AA release and prostacyclin synthesis via activation of distinct types of AT receptors. Both peptides appear to stimulate CaM kinase II, which in turn, via MAP kinase activation, enhances cPLA2 activity and release of AA for PG synthesis.     

Angiotensin-(1-7) and the rat aorta: modulation by the endothelium

Peptide metabolites of angiotensin I and II are active components of the renin-angiotensin system. One such peptide is angiotensin-(1-7), which has been shown to be present in various tissues and has properties distinct from those of angiotensin II. We examined the effects of angiotensin-(1-7) on endothelium-intact and denuded rat aorta. Second, we evaluated whether an interaction occurred between angiotensin-(1-7) and angiotensin peptides, as well as noradrenaline. Finally, we addressed whether the responses to angiotensin-(1-7) were mediated by an AT1 receptor. Angiotensin-(1-7) produced concentration-dependent relaxations of the rat aorta that were significantly greater in endothelium-intact preparations (81.1 +/- 18.9% and 29.6 +/- 2.9% for intact and denuded, respectively). Angiotensin-(1-7) inhibited responses generated to angiotensin I, II, III, and noradrenaline. In endothelium-denuded preparations, angiotensin-(1-7) produced a rightward shift of the concentration-effect curves to angiotensin II and noradrenaline. In addition, the inhibition against angiotensin I and II was significantly greater in endothelium-intact preparations [mean median inhibitory concentration (IC50) values for endothelium-intact preparations, 1.25 x 10(-9) M and 1.57 x 10(-9) M for angiotensin I and II, respectively; and for endothelium-denuded preparations, 1.77 x 10(-8) M and 1.17 x 10(-8) M for angiotensin I and II, respectively). Losartan did not affect relaxations in endothelium-intact preparations but caused a significant potentiation of the relaxation by angiotensin-(1-7) in denuded preparations. We conclude that angiotensin-(1-7) is a component of the renin-angiotensin system that acts to modulate the pressor effects of angiotensin II and noradrenaline.     

AT1 receptor-mediated stimulation by angiotensin II of rat aortic fibronectin gene expression in vivo

Fibronectin plays an important role in various vascular diseases. A subpressor (200 ng kg-1 min-1) or pressor (1000 ng kg-1 min-1) dose of angiotensin II was continuously infused into rats by osmotic minipump for various times, to investigate the effects on aortic fibronectin gene expression. In rats infused with a subpressor dose of angiotensin II in which blood pressure was normal for 3 days, aortic fibronectin mRNA levels started to increase by 1.4 fold at 12 h and reached the maximal levels (increased by 3.1 fold) at 3 days. Treatment with TCV-116 (3 mg kg-1 day-1), a non-peptide selective AT1 receptor antagonist, completely inhibited the angiotensin II-induced increase in aortic fibronectin mRNA, while hydralazine (10 mg kg-1 day-1) did not block this effect. Similar results were also obtained for a pressor dose of angiotensin II. Thus, angiotensin II directly stimulates aortic fibronectin gene expression in vivo, which is mediated by the AT1 receptor but not by blood pressure.