Compatibility of poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide)/poly(fluorostyrene-co-chlorostyrene) blends

The compatibility of poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) (PPO) with random copolymers of ortho- and para-fluorostyrene as well as with ortho- and para-chlorostyrene of various copolymer compositions was examined. The compatibility was studied by DSC and visual observation of film clarity. It was found that copolymers of ortho-fluorostyrene with para-chlorostyrene containing 15–74 mol % p-CIS are compatible with PPO in all proportions. Compatibility of the PPO/poly-(ortho-fluorostyrene-co-ortho-chlorostyrene) system was observed for copolymers containing between 15 and 36 mol % ortho-chlorostyrene. Copolymers of para-fluorostyrene with para-chlorostyrene, as well as copolymers of para-fluorostyrene with ortho-chlorostyrene appear to be incompatible with PPO at 210°C.     

Thermally induced phase separation in homogeneous blends of poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) with poly(o-fluorostyrene-co-p-chlorostyrene) and with poly(o-fluorostyrene-co-o-chlorostyrene)

The phase separation behavior of initially compatible blends of poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) (PPO) with poly(o-fluorostyrene-co-p-chlorostyrene) [poly(oFS-co-pCIS)] and with poly(o-fluorostyrene-co-o-chlorostyrene) [poly(oFS-co-oCIS)] was studied by DSC. It was found that copolymers of poly(oFS-co-pCIS) containing between 15 and 62 mol % pCIS have shown no phase separation after annealing at temperatures up to 320°C. It was also observed that blends containing this copolymer with 74 mol % pCIS show phase separation at 250°C, which depended on blend composition. Additionally, all PPO/poly(oFS-co-oCIS) blends exhibit phase separation after annealing to a temperature of 230°C. Thermal degradation of the polymer blends was not observed at the temperatures studied.     

Phase behavior of blends of poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide)/polystyrene/poly(o-chlorostyrene-co-p-chlorostyrene) copolymer

The phase behavior of ternary blends of poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) (PPO), polystyrene (PS) and a 50/50 mole % statistical copolymer of o-chlorostyrene and p-chlorostyrene [p(oClS-pClS)] has been investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and analyzed in terms of a Flory-Huggins mean-field segmental interaction parameter treatment. Both PS/PPO and PPO/p(oClS-pClS) binary blends exhibit single glass transition temperatures over the full composition range whereas the PS/p(oClS-pClS) system displays a substantial immiscibilty window which extends into the ternary phase diagram. In principle, ternary systems provide enhanced opportunities relative to binary systems for evaluating segmental interaction parameters χ_ijs from experimental data because of the high sensitivity of phase boundary locations to these parameters and to component molecular weights. In this system the effect of these parameters on the phase boundary was studied experimentally and compared to calculated values.     

Effect of pressure on phase behavior in polymer blends of poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) and poly(o-fluorostyrene-co-p-fluorostyrene) copolymers

The effect of pressure on miscibility and phase separation in blends of random copolymers of ortho- and para-fluorostyrene, P(o-FS-co-p-FS) and poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide), PPO, has been studied by differential thermal analysis (DTA) at pressures up to 300 MPa. At 200 MPa the copolymers containing from 10 to 38 mol% p-FS are miscible with PPO below 230°C using the customary criterion of a single calorimetric glass transition temperature (T_g). Each blend undergoes phase separation upon annealing at higher temperatures at both atmospheric and elevated pressures indicating the presence of a lower critical solution temperature (LCST). When the phase behaviors of the 50/50 wt% blends are examined as a function of temperature and copolymer composition, a symmetric miscibility “window” can be observed in the resulting temperature-composition diagram with a maximum at about 22 mol% p-FS. In a complementary set of experiments, the pressure dependence of the phase boundary for the blend of PPO and P(o-FS-co-p-FS) in which the copolymer contained 29 mol% p-FS was studied. The temperature minimum of the phase boundary is at about 50 wt% PPO and is independent of pressure. The consolute temperature, T_c, increases at about 0.1₀°C/MPa up to 200 MPa and then becomes independent of pressure to reach an asymptotic value at around 270°C. Similar behavior is also observed for blends in which the copolymer composition contains either 16 or 23 mol% p-FS. In these blends the decrease of dT_c/dP at higher pressures may indicate that the negative volume of mixing approaches zero above 200 MPa. This study shows therefore, that pressure no longer plays a role in increasing the miscibility above 200 MPa.     

Effect of copolymer composition on the miscibility of blends of styrene-acrylonitrile copolymers with poly (methyl methacrylate)

The phase behaviour for blends of various polymethacrylates with styrene-acrylonitrile (SAN) copolymers has been examined as a function of the acrylonitrile content of the copolymer. Poly(methyl methacrylate), poly(ethyl methacrylate) and poly(n-propyl methacrylate) were found to be miscible with SANs over a limited window of acrylonitrile contents while no SANs appear to be miscible with poly(isopropyl methacrylate) or poly(n-butyl methacrylate). These conclusions were reached on the basis of lower critical solution temperature (LCST) and glass transition temperature behaviour. All miscible blends exhibited phase separation on heating, LCST behaviour, at temperatures which varied greatly with copolymer composition. An optimum acrylonitrile (AN) level ranging from about 10 to 14% by weight resulted in the highest temperatures for phase separation which has important implications for selection of SANs to produce homogeneous mixtures by melt processing. The basis for miscibility in these systems is evidently repulsion between styrene and acrylonitrile units in the copolymer as explained by recent models. The excess volumes for all blends are zero within experimental accuracy which suggests that the interactions for miscibility are relatively weak even for the optimum AN level. This interaction becomes smaller the larger or more bulky is the alkyl side group of the polymethacrylate.     

Compatibility of poly(p-fluorostyrene-co-o-fluorostyrene) with poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) and polystyrene

The compatibility of blends prepared from random copolymers of p-fluorostyrene and o-fluorostyrene with poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) (PPO) and blends of the copolymers with polystyrene (PS) has been examined using differential scanning calorimetry. It was found that compatibility in these systems depends on copolymer composition: copolymers containing from 10 to 38% of p-fluorostyrene are miscible with PPO in all proportions. The thermally induced phase separation in these systems was also studied and the existence of lower critical solution temperatures (LCST) was established for all compatible blends. The copolymers were found to be incompatible with PS regardless of composition.     

Blends of poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide)/ poly(styrene-co-methacrylic acid)/ poly(ethyl methacrylate-co-4-vinylpyridine)

Summary The miscibility of poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) (PPO) with poly(styrene-co-acrylic acid) (SAA) or poly(styrene-co-methacrylic acid) (SMA) containing respectively up to 22 mol % of acrylic or methacrylic acid was studied by Differential Scanning Calorimetry and viscosimetry. All PPO/SAA or PPO/SMA blends containing 60% or less by weight of PPO were miscible and showed only one glass transition temperature (Tg). Above 60% of PPO, two Tg's were however observed for the blends in which the acid content in the SAA or SMA reaches 20% or 12% by mole respectively; the higher Tg is slightly lower than the one of pure PPO, while the lower one corresponds to a miscible blend of lower content of PPO.A DSC study showed that depending on the blend ratio, two or three glass transition temperatures were observed when a copolymer of ethyl methacrylate containing 8 mol % of 4-vinylpyridine (EM4VP-8) was added to miscible PPO/SMA-12 blends. The PPO dissolution in the SMA-12 copolymer was affected by the specific interactions that occurred between this latter copolymer and the EM4VP-8.     

A Fourier transform infra-red study of the phase behaviour of polymer blends. Ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer blends with poly(vinyl chloride) and chlorinated polyethylene

Fourier transform infra-red studies of ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) blends with poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) and chlorinated polyethylene (CPE) are presented. Previous studies have demonstrated that these blends are compatible at ambient temperature and exhibit lower critical solution temperatures (LCST) in a range that is readily accessible and below the onset of significant polymer degradation. Infra-red spectra of EVA-PVC and EVA-CPE films cast from solution and recorded at room temperature exhibit the familiar frequency shifts and band broadenings of the carbonyl stretching vibration that are consistent with compatible blend systems. Significantly, at temperatures above the LCST, these spectral features are not observed, which implies phase separation. By monitoring the frequency of the EVA carbonyl stretching vibration in samples of the blends, an estimation of the relative strength of the intermolecular interactions has been obtained as a function of temperature. A non-linear relationship is observed and the temperature at which the relative strength of the intermolecular interaction appears very weak correlates with the LCST. The implications of these results are discussed.     

Dielectric relaxation of poly(chlorostyrenes) and their copolymers in the primary transition region

Dielectric relaxation measurements were carried out on a series of bulk poly(chlorostyrene) homopolymers and random copolymers over the frequency range from 50 to 100 kHz and at temperatures in the neighbourhood of the glass transitions of the polymers thus encompassing the α relaxation. Homopolymers examined were polystyrene (PS), poly(2-chlorostyrene) (P2CS), poly(3-chlorostyrene) (P3CS), and poly(4-chlorostyrene) (P4CS). Copolymers were poly(styrene-co-2-chlorostyrene) (PS2CS), poly(styrene-co-4-chlorostyrene) (PS4CS), and poly(2-chlorostyrene-co-4-chlorostyrene) (P2CS4CS). The dielectric data were analysed to yield dipole moments and Kirkwood—Fröhlich correlation parameters. The shapes of the dielectric loss curves were also taken into account. Glass transition temperatures were determined by differential scanning calorimetry (d.s.c.). It was concluded that the phenyl ring rotates freely in the α relaxation regions of PS, P4CS, and P3CS, but not in P2CS. The dipole moments of the copolymers are correlated with dyad distributions calculated from reactivity ratios.     

Glass‐transition and melting behavior of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) blends

The glass‐transition temperatures and melting behaviors of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) (PET/PEN) blends were studied. Two blend systems were used for this work, with PET and PEN of different grades. It was found that T_g increases almost linearly with blend composition. Both the Gibbs–DiMarzio equation and the Fox equation fit experimental data very well, indicating copolymer‐like behavior of the blend systems. Multiple melting peaks were observed for all blend samples as well as for PET and PEN. The equilibrium melting point was obtained using the Hoffman–Weeks method. The melting points of PET and PEN were depressed as a result of the formation of miscible blends and copolymers. The Flory–Huggins theory was used to study the melting‐point depression for the blend system, and the Nishi–Wang equation was used to calculate the interaction parameter (χ₁₂). The calculated χ₁₂ is a small negative number, indicating the formation of thermodynamically stable, miscible blends. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 81: 11–22, 2001     

Poly(para‐dioxanone)/poly(D,L‐lactide) blends compatibilized with poly(D,L‐lactide‐co‐para‐dioxanone)

The effect of poly(D ,L ‐lactide‐co‐para‐dioxanone) (PLADO) as the compatibilizer on the properties of the blend of poly(para‐dioxanone) (PPDO) and poly(D ,L ‐lactide) (PDLLA) has been investigated. The 80/20 PPDO/PDLLA blends containing from 1% to 10% of random copolymer PLADO were prepared by solution coprecipitation. The PLADO component played a very important role in determining morphology, thermal, mechanical, and hydrophilic properties of the blends. Addition of PLADO into the blends could enhance the compatibility between dispersed PDLLA phase and PPDO matrix; the boundary between the two phases became unclear and even the smallest holes were not detected. On the other hand, the position of the T_g was composition dependent; when 5% PLADO was added into blend, the T_g distance between PPDO and PDLLA was shortened. The blends with various contents of compatibilizer had better mechanical properties compared with simple PPDO/PDLLA binary polymer blend, and such characteristics further improved as adding 5% random copolymers. The maximum observed tensile strength was 29.05 MPa for the compatibilized PPDO/PDLLA blend with 5% PLADO, whereas tensile strength of the uncompatibilized PPDO/PDLLA blend was 14.03 MPa, which was the lowest tensile strength. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Synthesis, thermal properties, and specific interactions of high Tg increase in poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide)-block-polystyrene copolymers

We have synthesized a series of block copolymers of poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) and polystyrene (PPO-b-PS copolymer) by atom transfer radical polymerization. The PS content in these copolymer systems was determined by using infrared spectroscopy, thermal gravimetric analysis, and solution and solid-state NMR spectroscopy; good correlations exist between these characterization methods. DSC analyses indicated that the PPO-b-PS copolymers have higher glass transition temperatures than do their corresponding PPO/PS blends. Our FTIR and solid-state NMR spectroscopic analyses suggest that the PPO-b-PS copolymers possess stronger specific interactions that are responsible for the observed relatively higher values of T_g. We found one single dynamic relaxation from the dynamic mechanical analysis, which implies dynamic homogeneity exists in the PPO-b-PS copolymer; this result is consistent with the one single proton spin-lattice relaxation time observed in the rotating frame [T_1ρ(H)] during solid state NMR spectroscopic analysis. In addition, the 2D FTIR spectroscopy reveals evidence for the stronger interactions between segments of PPO and PS through the formation of π-cation complexes.     

Miscibility of poly (etherimide) and poly (butylene naphthalate) blends

Summary Differential scanning calorimeter (DSC), optical microscopy (OM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were performed to characterize the miscibility of a blend system comprising poly (butylene naphthalate) (PBN) and poly (ether imide) (PEI). DSC scans showed there was only one single Tg for each blend and the glass transitions increase monotonously with the increase of PEI content. The glass transition temperatures of the blends fitted the Fox equation well implying that the blends exhibited fine segmental scale of mixing. No lower critical solution temperature (LCST) was observed by OM for the blends. SEM micrographs showed the fracture surface of quenched sample exhibited a homogeneous structure. No obvious IR peak shift of C=O absorption at 1780 cm⁻¹ was observed suggesting a relatively low level of specific interaction between two molecules. It was concluded that these blends were miscible with non-specific intermolecular interactions. Received: 5 January 2001/Accepted: 27 February 2001     

Miscibility and phase behavior in blends containing random copolymers of poly(ether ether ketone) and phenolphthalein poly(ether ether ketone)

The miscibility and phase behavior of polysulfone (PSF) and poly(hydroxyether of bisphenol A) (phenoxy) with a series of copoly (ether ether ketone) (COPEEK), a random copolymer of poly(ether ether ketone) (PEEK), and phenolphthalein poly(ether ether ketone) (PEK-C) was studied using differential scanning calorimetry. A COPEEK copolymer containing 6 mol % ether ether ketone (EEK) repeat units is miscible with PSF, whereas copolymers containing 12mol % EEK and more are not. COPEEK copolymers containing 6 and 12 mol % EEK are completely miscible with phenoxy, but those containing 24 mol % EEK is partially miscible with phenoxy. Moreover, a copolymer containing 17 mol % EEK is partially miscible with phenoxy; the blends show two transitions in the midcomposition region and single transitions at either extreme. Two T_gs were observed for the 50/50 blend of phenoxy with the coplymer containing 17 mol % EEK, whereas a single composition-dependent T_g appeared for all the other compositions. An FTIR study revealed that there exist hydrogen-bonding interactions between phenoxy and the copolymers. The strengths of the hydrogen-bonding interactions in the blends of the COPEEK copolymers containing 6 and 12 mol % EEK are the same as that in the phenoxy/PEK-C blend. However, for the blends of copolymers containing 17, 24, and 28 mol % EEK, the hydrogen-bonding interactions become increasingly unfavorable and the self-association of the hydroxyl groups of phenoxy is preferable as the content of EEK units in the copolymer increases. The observed miscibility was interpreted qualitatively in terms of the mean-field approach. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Phase behavior of binary and ternary blends of poly(styrene‐co‐methacrylic acid), poly(styrene‐co‐4‐vinylpyridine), and poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene oxide)

Poly(styrene‐co‐methacrylic acid) (PSMA) and poly(styrene‐co‐4‐vinylpyridine) (PS4VP) of different compositions were prepared and characterized. The phase behavior of these copolymers as binary PSMA/PS4VP mixtures or with poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene oxide) (PPO) as PPO/PSMA or PPO/PS4VP and PPO/PSMA/PS4VP ternary blends was investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). This study showed that PPO was miscible with PS4VP containing up to 15 mol % 4‐vinylpyridine (4VP) but immiscible with PS4VP‐30 (where the number following the hyphen refers to the percentage 4VP in the polymer) and PSMA‐20 (where the number following the hyphen refers to the percentage methacrylic acid in the polymer) over the entire composition range. To examine the morphology of the immiscible blends, scanning electron microscopy was used. Because of the hydrogen‐bonding specific interactions that occurred between the carboxylic groups of PSMA and the pyridine groups of PS4VP, chloroform solutions of PSMA‐20 and PS4VP‐15 formed interpolymer complexes. The obtained glass‐transition temperatures (T_g's) of the PSMA‐20/PS4VP‐15 complexes were found to be higher than those calculated from the additivity rule. Although, depending on the content of 4VP, the shape of the T_g of the PPO/PS4VP blends changed from concave to S‐shaped in the case of the miscible blends, two T_g were observed with each PPO/PS4VP‐30 and PPO/PS4VP‐40 blend. The thermal stability of the PSMA‐20/PS4VP‐15 interpolymer complexes was studied by thermogravimetry. On the basis of the obtained results, the phase behavior of the ternary PPO/PSMA‐20/PS4VP‐15 blends was investigated by DSC. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Blends of head-to-head polystyrene with poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide)

Blends of head-to-head polystyrene and poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) were prepared and found to be miscible as judged by a single T_g. The measurements were carried out by d.s.c. and dilatometry. At high concentrations of PPO (> 80%) the mixture is on the threshold of incompatibility as indicated by the increase of the width of the transition step increase by d.s.c. and the increase of the free volume as calculated from dilatometric data. The thermal stability studies of head-to-head polystyrene-(HH-PS)-poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) (PPO) blends by thermal volatilization analysis show two decomposition processes in the temperature range characteristic for both homopolymers. The temperature of the maximum rate of decomposition for PPO in the blend is slightly shifted towards lower temperatures as compared with pure PPO. This can be explained by assuming that the PPO degradation is induced by radicals formed during the decomposition of HH-PS.     

Miscibility in poly(vinyl chloride)/chlorinated poly(vinyl chloride) blends,and blends of different chlorinated poly(vinyl chlorides)

Blends of poly(vinyl chloride) with chlorinated poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC), and blends of different chlorinated poly(vinyl chlorides) (CPVC) provide an opportunity to examine systematically the effect that small changes in chemical structure have on polymer-polymer miscibility. Phase diagrams of PVC/CPVC blends have been determined for CPVC's containing 62 to 38 percent chlorine. The characteristics of binary blends of CPVC's of different chlorine contents have also been examined using differential calorimetry (DSC) and transmission electron microscopy. Their mutual solubility has been found to be very sensitive to their differences in mole percent CCl₂ groups and degree of chlorination. In metastable binary blends of CPVC's possessing single glass transition temperatures (T_g) the rate of phase separation, as followed by DSC, was found to be relatively slow at temperatures 45 to 65° above the T_g of the blend.     

Novel blends of alternating propene-carbon monoxide copolymers and styrenic copolymers

Summary Alternating propene-carbon monoxide copolymers (P-CO) were melt-blended with polystyrene, poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) (SAN), and with poly(styrene-co-maleic anhydride) (SMA). P-CO forms homogeneously miscible blends with SAN containing 25 wt% AN at the investigated blend compositions. The transparent blends have single, intermediate glass transition temperatures that fit the Fox equation. The elastic properties of P-CO at room temperature disappear upon blending with SAN because the T _g is driven above RT. Polystyrene and SMA are not miscible with P-CO and form heterogeneous blends with two glass transitions. This demonstrates that both the polarity of the styrenic copolymer and the nature of the comonomer govern its phase behavior. Received: 14 January 1999/Revised version: 19 April 1999/Accepted: 19 April 1999     

Phase behavior for blends of styrene containing triblock copolymers with poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide)

The extent to which the styrene end-blocks of three commercially available triblock copolymers can mix with a particular poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) (M_n = 22,600 and M_w = 34,000) or PPO has been examined by investigation of the glass transition behavior of the PPO and polystyrene (PS) portions of the blends using differential scanning calorimetry. Each block copolymer has a butadiene-based mid-block which was hydrogenated for two of these materials, but not the third. The three copolymers differ substantially in overall molecular weight and in molecula weight of the blocks. However, in analogy with the literature on blends of homopolymer polystyrene with styrene-based block copolymers, the molecular weight of the PS block should be the principal factor affecting the phase behavior in the present blends. Mixtures of the PPO with the block copolymers having PS blocks with M = 14,500 (nonhydrogenated midblock) and with M = 29,000 (hydrogenated mid-block) exhibited single composition-dependent T_gs for the hard phase, indicating complete mixing of PS segments with the PPO, for all proportions. On the other hand, the block copolymer having a PS block with M = 7,500 and a hydrogenated mid-block exhibited two separate hard phase T_gs corresponding to an essentially pure PPO phase and a PS-rich phase. For blends of homopolymer PS with styrene-based block copolymers, the similar two-phase behavior of the glassy portion can be readily explained by entropic considerations. For the present case, the favorable enthalpic contribution for mixing PPO and PS is an additional factor which seems to influence the restrictions on molecular weight for complete mixing; however, additional work is needed to develop a more quantitative assessment of this new issue.     

Conformational motions in immiscible blends of polycarbonate and styrene-acrylonitrile copolymers

Blends of commercial bisphenol-A -polycarbonate and styrene-acrylonitrile copolymers were prepared by precipitation in ethanol from the solution in methylene chloride in order to eliminate the low molecular weight substances contained in the commercial polymers, specially the oligomers contained in commercial SAN copolymers. Two glass transitions appear in the DSC thermograms of the blend at the same temperatures as in the pure components which, in principle, indicates that the blend consists of two phases formed by pure PC and pure SAN. In order to detect small changes in the glass transition process that could be indicative of different mobility of the polymer chains in the blend with respect to the pure polymers, blends of different compositions were subjected to different thermal treatments that included annealing at temperatures below both glass transitions, and then the DSC thermograms were recorded. A broadening in the peaks shown by the c_p(T) curves measured on annealed samples in the zone of the PC transition is detected while no significant differences are shown by the glass transition of the San phase of the blend with respect to pure SAN copolymer. Dielectric relaxation experiments in the frequency domain (from 100 to 3·10⁶Hz) were carried out on the blends. The dielectric relaxation spectrum in the zone of the SAN main relaxation process was fitted with the stretched exponential equation showing no significant difference between the blends and the pure SAN copolymer. The region of the main relaxation process of PC was not analyzed due to the small polar activity of PC and the overlapping with the relaxation of the SAN phase.