Hydrogen sorption in MgH2-based composites: The role of Ni and LiBH4 additives

In the present work we investigate the hydrogen sorption properties of composites in the MgH₂–Ni, MgH₂–Ni–LiH and MgH₂–Ni–LiBH₄ systems and analyze why Ni addition improve hydrogen sorption rates while LiBH₄ enhance the hydrogen storage capacity. Although all composites with Ni addition showed significantly improved hydrogen storage kinetics compared with the pure MgH₂, the fastest hydrogen sorption kinetics is obtained for Ni-doped MgH₂. The formation of Mg₂Ni/Mg₂NiH₄ in Ni-doped MgH₂ composite and its microstructure allows to uptake 5.0 wt% of hydrogen in 25 s and to release it in 8 min at 275 °C. In the MgH₂–Ni–LiBH₄ composite, decomposition of LiBH₄ occurs during the first dehydriding leading to the formation of diborane, which has a Ni catalyst poison effect via the formation of a passivating boron layer. A combination of FTIR, XRD and volumetric measurements demonstrate that the formation of MgNi₃B₂ in the MgH₂–Ni–LiBH₄ composite happens in the subsequent hydriding cycle from the reaction between Mg₂Ni/Mg₂NiH₄ and B. Activation energy analysis demonstrates that the presence of Ni particles has a catalytic effect in MgH₂–Ni and MgH₂–Ni–LiH systems, but it is practically nullified by the addition of LiBH₄. The beneficial role of LiBH₄ on the hydrogen storage capacity of the MgH₂–Ni–LiBH₄ composite is discussed.     

Mg2FeH6–LiBH4 and Mg2FeH6–LiNH2 composite materials for hydrogen storage

Two composite hydrogen storage materials based on Mg₂FeH₆ were investigated for the first time. The Mg₂FeH₆–LiBH₄ composite of molar ratio 1:5 showed a hydrogen desorption capacity of 5.6 wt.% at 370 °C, and could be rehydrogenated to 3.6 wt.% with the formation of MgH₂, as the material was heated to 445 °C and held at this temperature. The Mg₂FeH₆–LiNH₂ composite of 3:10 molar ratio exhibited a hydrogen desorption capacity of 4.3 wt.% and released hydrogen at 100 °C lower then the Mg₂FeH₆–LiBH₄ composite, but this mixture could not be rehydrogenated. Compared to neat Mg₂FeH₆, both composites show enhanced hydrogen storage properties in terms of desorption kinetics and capacity at these low temperatures. In particular, Mg₂FeH₆–LiNH₂ exhibits a much lower desorption temperature than neat Mg₂FeH₆, but only Mg₂FeH₆–LiBH₄ re-absorbs hydrogen.     

Hydrogen storage performance of 5LiBH4 + Mg2FeH6 composite system

The hydrogen storage properties of 5LiBH₄ + Mg₂FeH₆ reactive hydride composites for reversible hydrogen storage were investigated by comparing with the 2LiBH₄ + MgH₂ composite in the present work. The dehydrogenation pathway and reaction mechanism of 5LiBH₄ + Mg₂FeH₆ composite were also investigated and elucidated. The self-decomposition of Mg₂FeH₆ leads to the in situ formation of Mg and Fe particles on the surface of LiBH₄, resulting in a well dispersion between different reacting phases. The formation of FeB is observed during the dehydrogenation of 5LiBH₄ + Mg₂FeH₆ composite, which might supplies nucleation sites of MgB₂ during the dehydrogenation process, but is not an ascendant catalyst for the self-decomposition of LiBH₄. And FeB can also transform to the LiBH₄ and Fe by reacting with LiH and H₂ during the rehydrogenation process. The dehydrogenation capacity for 5LiBH₄ + Mg₂FeH₆ composite still gets to 6.5 wt% even after four cycles. The X-ray diffraction analyses reveal the phase transitions during the hydriding and dehydriding cycle. The formed FeB in the composite maintains a nanostructure after four hydriding-dehydriding cycles. The loss of hydrogen storage capacity and de-/rehydrogenation kinetics can be attributed to the incomplete generation of Mg₂FeH₆ during the rehydrogenation process.     

Hydrogen storage performance of LiBH4+1/2MgH2 composites improved by Ce-based additives

LiBH₄+1/2MgH₂ is a promising reactive hydride composite for hydrogen storage. In the present study, three Ce-based additives were used as catalysts to enhance the hydrogen storage performance of LiBH₄+1/2MgH₂ composites. The composites with Ce additives demonstrated significantly improved dehydrogenation kinetics and cyclic stability compared with the pure composite. X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy analyses clearly revealed the phase transitions and morphological evolution during the hydriding-dehydriding cycling. The composites with Ce-based additives displayed stable nanostructures, in contrast to the rapid microstructural deterioration in the uncatalyzed composite. The CeB₆ formed in the composites had a particle size of 10 nm after five cycles. It may act as the nucleus for MgB₂ formation during dehydrogenation and thus account for the structural and performance stability of the composites upon cycling.     

Reversible hydrogen storage from 6LiBH4-MCl3 (M = Ce, Gd) composites by in-situ formation of MH2

Different destabilized LiBH₄ systems with several interacting components are being explored for hydrogen storage applications. In this study, hydrogen sorption properties of as-milled 6LiBH₄-MCl₃ composites (M = Ce, Gd) are investigated by X-ray diffraction, differential scanning calorimetry and thermovolumetric measurements. The chemical interaction between metal halides and LiBH₄ decreases the dehydrogenation temperature in comparison with as-milled LiBH₄. Hydrogen release starts at 220 °C from the decomposition of M(BH₄)₃ formed during milling and proceeds through destabilization of LiBH₄ by in-situ formed MH₂. The dehydrogenation products CeB₆-LiH and GdB₄-LiH can be rehydrided under moderate conditions, i.e 400 °C and 6.0 MPa of hydrogen pressure for 2 h without catalyst. A new 6LiBH₄-CeCl₃-3LiH composite shows promissory hydrogen storage properties via the formation by milling of CeH_2+x. Our study is the first work about reversible hydrogen storage in LiBH₄-MCl₃ composites destabilized by in-situ formed MH₂.     

Enhanced dehydrogenation properties of LiBH4 compositing with hydrogenated magnesium-rare earth compounds

LiBH₄ is regarded as a promising hydrogen storage material due to its high hydrogen density. In this study, the dehydrogenation properties of LiBH₄ were remarkably enhanced by doping hydrogenated Mg₃RE compounds (RE denotes La, Ce, Nd rare earth metals), which are composed of nanostructured MgH₂ and REH_2+x (denoted as H − Mg₃RE). For the LiBH₄ + H − Mg₃La mixture, the component LiBH₄ desorbed 6 wt.% hydrogen even at a relatively low temperature of 340 °C, far lower than the desorption temperature of pure LiBH₄ or the 2LiBH₄ + MgH₂ system. This kinetic improvement is attributed to the hydrogen exchange mechanism between the H − Mg₃La and LiBH₄, in the sense that the decomposition of MgH₂ and LaH_2+x catalyzed the dehydrogenation of LiBH₄ through hydrogen exchange effect rather than mutual chemical reaction requiring higher temperature and hydrogen pressure. However, prior to fast hydrogen release, the hydrogen exchange effect suppressed the dehydriding of MgH₂ and elevated its desorption temperature. It is expected to strengthen the hydrogen exchange effect by compositing the LiBH₄ with other nanosized metal hydrides and to obtain better dehydrogenation properties.     

Hydrogen storage behavior of 2LiBH4/MgH2 composites improved by the catalysis of CoNiB nanoparticles

2LiBH₄/MgH₂ system is a representative and promising reactive hydride composite for hydrogen storage. However, the high desorption temperature and sluggish desorption kinetics hamper its practical application. In our present report, we successfully introduce CoNiB nanoparticles as catalysts to improve the dehydrogenation performances of the 2LiBH₄/MgH₂ composite. The sample with CoNiB additives shows a significant desorption property. Temperature programmed desorption (TPD) measurement demonstrates that the peak decomposition temperatures of MgH₂ and LiBH₄ are lowered to be 315 °C and 417 °C for the CoNiB-doped 2LiBH₄/MgH₂. Isothermal dehydrogenation analysis demonstrates that approximately 10.2 wt% hydrogen can be released within 360 min at 400 °C. In addition, this study gives a preliminary evidence for understanding the CoNiB catalytic mechanism of 2LiBH₄/MgH₂     

Synergistic catalytic effect of SrTiO3 and Ni on the hydrogen storage properties of MgH2

Study on the synergistic catalytic effect of the SrTiO₃ and Ni on the improvement of the hydrogen storage properties of the MgH₂ system has been carried out. The composites have been prepared using ball milling method and comparisons on the hydrogen storage properties of the MgH₂ – Ni and MgH₂ – SrTiO₃ composites have been presented. The MgH₂ – 10 wt% SrTiO₃ – 5 wt% Ni composite is found to has a decomposition temperature of 260 °C with a total decomposition capacity of 6 wt% of hydrogen. The composite is able to absorb 6.1 wt% of hydrogen in 1.3 min (320 °C, 27 atm of hydrogen). At 150 °C, the composite is able to absorb 2.9 wt% of hydrogen in 10 min under the pressure of 27 atm of hydrogen. The composite has successfully released 6.1 wt% of hydrogen in 13.1 min with a total dehydrogenation of 6.6 wt% of hydrogen (320 °C). The apparent activation energy, E_a, for decomposition of SrTiO₃-doped MgH₂ reduced from 109.0 kJ/mol to 98.6 kJ/mol after the addition of 5 wt% Ni. The formation of Mg₂Ni and Mg₂NiH₄ as the active species help to boost the performance of the hydrogen storage properties of the MgH₂ system. Observation of the scanning electron microscopy images suggested the catalytic role of the SrTiO₃ additive is based on the modification of composite microstructure.     

The hydrogen storage properties and reaction mechanism of the MgH2-NaAlH4 composite system

In this study, we report the hydrogen absorption/desorption properties and reaction mechanism of the MgH₂-NaAlH₄ (4:1) composite system. This composite system showed improved dehydrogenation performance compared with that of as-milled NaAlH₄ and MgH₂ alone. The dehydrogenation process in the MgH₂-NaAlH₄ composite can be divided into four stages: NaAlH₄ is first reacted with MgH₂ to form a perovskite-type hydride, NaMgH₃ and Al. In the second dehydrogenation stage, the Al phase reacts with MgH₂ to form Mg₁₇Al₁₂ phase accompanied with the self-decomposition of the excessive MgH₂. NaMgH₃ goes on to decompose to NaH during the third dehydrogenation stage, and the last stage is the decomposition of NaH. Kissinger analysis indicated that the apparent activation energy, E_A, for the MgH₂-relevent decomposition in MgH₂-NaAlH₄ composite was 148 kJ/mol, which is 20 kJ/mol less than for as-milled MgH₂ (168 kJ/mol). X-ray diffraction patterns indicate that the second, third, and fourth stages are fully reversible. It is believed that the formation of Al₁₂Mg₁₇ phase during the dehydrogenation process alters the reaction pathway of the MgH₂-NaAlH₄ (4:1) composite system and improves its thermodynamic properties.     

Improved reversible dehydrogenation of LiBH4–MgH2 composite by the synergistic effects of Al and MgO

In this paper, we report a novel method of improving the reversible dehydrogenation properties of the 2LiBH₄–MgH₂ composite. Our study found that mechanically milling with small amount of Al powder can markedly shorten or even eliminate the problematic incubation period that interrupts the dehydrogenation steps of the 2LiBH₄–MgH₂ composite. But the resulting composite showed serious kinetics degradation upon cycling. In an effort to solve this problem, we found that combined usage of small amounts of Al and MgO enabled the 2LiBH₄–MgH₂ composite to rapidly and reversibly deliver around 9 wt% hydrogen at 400 °C under 0.3 MPa H₂, which compares favorably with the dehydrogenation performance of the composites with transition-metal additives. A combination of phase/microstructural analyses and series of control experiments has been conducted to gain insight into the promoting effects of Al and MgO. It was found that Al and MgO additives act as precursor and promoter for the formation of AlB₂ heterogeneous nucleation sites, respectively.     

Effect of LiBH4 on hydrogen storage property of MgH2

The effect of lithium borohydride (LiBH₄) on the hydriding/dehydriding kinetics and thermodynamics of magnesium hydride (MgH₂) was investigated. It was found that LiBH₄ played both positive and negative effects on the hydrogen sorption of MgH₂. With 10 mol.% LiBH₄ content, MgH₂–10 mol.% LiBH₄ had superior hydrogen absorption/desorption properties, which could absorb 6.8 wt.% H within 1300 s at 200 °C under 3 MPa H₂ and completed desorption within 740 s at 350 °C. However, with the increasing amount of LiBH₄, the hydrogenation/dehydrogenation kinetics deteriorated, and the starting desorption temperature increased and the hysteresis of the pressure-composition isotherm (PCI) became larger. Our results showed that the positive effect of LiBH₄ was mainly attributed to the more uniform powder mixture with smaller particle size, while the negative effect of LiBH₄ might be caused by the H–H exchange between LiBH₄ and MgH₂.     

Dehydriding and re-hydriding properties of high-energy ball milled LiBH4 + MgH2 mixtures

Here we report the first investigation of the dehydriding and re-hydriding properties of 2LiBH₄ + MgH₂ mixtures in the solid state. Such a study is made possible by high-energy ball milling of 2LiBH₄ + MgH₂ mixtures at liquid nitrogen temperature with the addition of graphite. The 2LiBH₄ + MgH₂ mixture ball milled under this condition exhibits a 5-fold increase in the released hydrogen at 265 °C when compared with ineffectively ball milled counterparts. Furthermore, both LiBH₄ and MgH₂ contribute to hydrogen release in the solid state. The isothermal dehydriding/re-hydriding cycles at 265 °C reveal that re-hydriding is dominated by re-hydriding of Mg. These unusual phenomena are explained based on the formation of nanocrystalline and amorphous phases, the increased defect concentration in crystalline compounds, and possible catalytic effects of Mg, MgH₂ and LiBH₄ on their dehydriding and re-hydriding properties.     

Destabilization of LiBH4 by MH2 (M = Ce, La) for hydrogen storage: Nanostructural effects on the hydrogen sorption kinetics

Destabilization of LiBH₄ by addition of metal hydrides or borohydrides is a powerful strategy to develop new promising hydrogen storage systems. In this study, we compare the destabilization behavior of the LiBH₄ by addition of MH₂ (M = La, Ce). A notable improvement in the hydrogen desorption temperature, the rate and the weight percentage of hydrogen released is observed for LiBH₄-MH₂ with respect to LiBH₄. Formation of LaB₆ and CeB₆ after dehydriding of the composites is proved by PXRD. Remarkable hydrogen storage reversibility of LiBH₄-MH₂ composites is confirmed under moderate conditions: 400 °C and 6.0 MPa of hydrogen pressure for 4 h without catalyst. The LiBH₄-LaH₂ composite exhibits improved hydrogen desorption performance compared with LiBH₄-CeH₂ composite, but the hydrogen storage reversibility is inferior. Notably, the LiBH₄-CeH₂ nanocomposite produced by in situ formation of CeH₂ from Ce(BH₄)₃-LiH displays excellent hydrogen storage properties. The addition of ZrCl₄ as a catalyst improves dehydriding kinetics. The mechanism underlying the enhancement in the LiBH₄-MH₂ composites is also discussed. Our study is the first work about reversible hydrogen storage in LiBH₄-LaH₂.     

Improved hydrogen storage reversibility of LiBH4 destabilized by Y(BH4)3 and YH3

In the present study, the synthesis of two different LiBH₄–Y(BH₄)₃ and LiBH₄–YH₃ composites was performed by mechanochemical processing of the 4LiBH₄–YCl₃ mixture and as-milled 4LiBH₄–YCl₃ plus 3LiH. It was found that Y(BH₄)₃ and YH₃ formed in situ during milling are effective to promote LiBH₄ destabilization but differ substantially from each other in terms of the dehydrogenation pathway. During LiBH₄–Y(BH₄)₃ dehydriding, Y(BH₄)₃ decomposes first generating in situ freshly YH₃ and subsequently, it destabilizes LiBH₄ with the formation of minor amounts of YB₄. About 20% of the theoretical hydrogen storage was obtained via the rehydriding of YB₄–4LiH–3LiCl at 400 °C and 6.5 MPa. As a novel result, a compound containing (B₁₂H₁₂)²⁻ group was identified during dehydriding of Y(BH₄)₃. In the case of 4LiBH₄–YH₃ dehydrogenation, the increase of the hydrogen back pressure favors the formation of crystalline YB_4, whereas a reduction to ≤0.1 MPa induces the formation of minor amounts of Li₂B₁₂H₁₂. Although for hydrogen pressures ≤0.1 MPa direct LiBH₄ decomposition can occur, the main dehydriding pathway of 4LiBH₄–YH₃ composite yields YB₄ and LiH. The nanostructured composite obtained by mechanochemical processing gives good hydrogen storage reversibility (about 80%) regardless of the hydrogen back pressure.     

Hydrogen sorption,kinetics, reversibility,and reaction mechanisms of MgH2-xLiBH4 doped with activated carbon nanofibers for reversible hydrogen storage based laboratory powder and tank scales

De/rehydrogenation kinetics and reversibility of MgH₂ are improved by doping with activated carbon nanofibers (ACNF) and compositing with LiBH₄. Via doping with 5 wt % ACNF, hydrogen absorption of Mg to MgH₂ (T = 320 °C and p(H₂) = 50 bar) increases from 0.3 to 4.5 wt % H₂. Significant reduction of onset dehydrogenation temperature of MgH₂ to 340 °C (ΔT = 70 °C as compared with pristine MgH₂) together with 6.8–8.2 wt % H₂ can be obtained by compositing Mg-5 wt. % ACNF with LiBH₄ (LiBH₄:Mg mole ratios of 0.5:1, 1:1, and 2:1). During dehydrogenation of Mg-rich composites (0.5:1 and 1:1 mol ratios), the formation of MgB₂ and Mg_0.816Li_0.184 implying the reaction between LiBH₄ and MgH₂ favors kinetic properties and reversibility, while the composite with 2:1 mol ratio shows individual dehydrogenation of LiBH₄ and MgH₂. For up-scaling to hydrogen storage tank (～120 times greater sample weight than laboratory scale) of the most suitable composite (1:1 mol ratio), de/rehydrogenation kinetics and hydrogen content released at all positions of the tank are comparable and approach to those from laboratory scale. Due to high purity (100%) and temperature of hydrogen gas from hydride tank, the performance of single proton exchange membrane fuel cell enhances up to 30% with respect to the results from compressed gas tank.     

Combined effects of hydrogen back-pressure and NbF5 addition on the dehydrogenation and rehydrogenation kinetics of the LiBH4–MgH2 composite system

It is well known that the dehydrogenation pathway of the LiBH₄–MgH₂ composite system is highly reliant on whether decomposition is performed under vacuum or a hydrogen back-pressure. In this work, the effects of hydrogen back-pressure and NbF₅ addition on the dehydrogenation kinetics of the LiBH₄–MgH₂ system are studied under either vacuum or hydrogen back-pressure, as well as the subsequent rehydrogenation and cycling. For the pristine sample, faster desorption kinetics was obtained under vacuum, but the performance is compromised by slow absorption kinetics. In contrast, hydrogen back-pressure remarkably promotes the absorption kinetics and increases the reversible hydrogen storage capacity, but with the penalty of much slower desorption kinetics. These drawbacks were overcome after doping with NbF₅, with which the dehydrogenation and rehydrogenation kinetics was significantly improved. In particular, the enhanced kinetics was observed to persist well, even after 9 cycles, in the case of the NbF₅ doped sample under hydrogen back-pressure, as well as the suppression of forming Li₂B₁₂H₁₂. Furthermore, the mechanism that is behind these effects of NbF₅ additive on the reversible dehydrogenation reaction of the LiBH₄–MgH₂ system is discussed.     

Hydrogen desorption properties of MgH2/LiAlH4 composites

The hydrogen desorption properties of MgH₂–LiAlH₄ composites obtained by mechanical milling for different milling times have been investigated by Thermal Desorption Spectroscopy (TDS) and correlated to the sample microstructure and morphology analysed by X-ray Diffraction (XRD) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). The MgH₂–LiAlH₄ composites show improved hydrogen desorption properties in comparison with both as-received and ball-milled MgH₂. Mixing of MgH₂ with small amount of LiAlH₄ (5 wt.%) using short mechanical milling (15 min) shifts, in fact, the hydrogen desorption peak to lower temperature than those observed with both as-received and milled MgH₂ samples. Longer mixing times of the MgH₂–LiAlH₄ composites (30 and 60 min) reduce the catalytic activity of the LiAlH₄ additive as revealed by the shift of the hydrogen desorption peak to higher temperatures.     

A comparative study of LiBH4-based composites with metal hydrides and fluorides for hydrogen storage

A comparative study was performed on four LiBH₄-based hydrogen storage composites 2LiBH₄ + MgX₂ and 6LiBH₄ + CaX₂ (X = H and F). The composites with fluorides and those with corresponding hydrides exhibited similar hydrogen storage properties. The dehydrogenation of 2LiBH₄ + MgF₂ demonstrated a strong dependence on the hydrogen back pressure, similar to that of 2LiBH₄ + MgH₂. The reversible hydrogen storage of 2LiBH₄ + MgF₂ was achieved under a back pressure of 5 bar at 450 °C. Dehydrogenation under lower H₂ pressures resulted in the production of Mg and thus a partial reversibility. In contrast, both 6LiBH₄ + CaH₂ and 6LiBH₄ + CaF₂ revealed reversible hydrogen storage properties regardless of the hydrogen back pressure. The structural difference between MgB₂ and CaB₆ may account for the observed differences in hydrogen storage properties of the Mg- and Ca-containing LiBH₄ reactive composites.     

Mechanistic investigations on significantly improved hydrogen storage performance of the Ca(BH4)2-added 2LiNH2/MgH2 system

The hydrogen storage properties and mechanisms of the Ca(BH₄)₂-added 2LiNH₂–MgH₂ system were systematically investigated. The results showed that the addition of Ca(BH₄)₂ pronouncedly improved hydrogen storage properties of the 2LiNH₂–MgH₂ system. The onset temperature for dehydrogenation of the 2LiNH₂–MgH₂–0.3Ca(BH₄)₂ sample is only 80 °C, a ca. 40 °C decline with respect to the pristine sample. Further hydrogenation examination indicated that the dehydrogenated 2LiNH₂–MgH₂–0.1Ca(BH₄)₂ sample could absorb ca. 4.7 wt% of hydrogen at 160 °C and 100 atm while only 0.8 wt% of hydrogen was recharged into the dehydrogenated pristine sample under the same conditions. Structural analyses revealed that during ball milling, a metathesis reaction between Ca(BH₄)₂ and LiNH₂ firstly occurred to convert to Ca(NH₂)₂ and LiBH₄, and then, the newly developed LiBH₄ reacted with LiNH₂ to form Li₄(BH₄)(NH₂)₃. Upon heating, the in situ formed Ca(NH₂)₂ and Li₄(BH₄)(NH₂)₃ work together to significantly decrease the operating temperatures for hydrogen storage in the Ca(BH₄)₂-added 2LiNH₂–MgH₂ system.     

Effect of LiH on hydrogen storage property of MgH2

Recent works showed that the addition of LiBH₄ significantly improves the sorption kinetics of MgH₂, and LiH decomposed from LiBH₄ was supposed to play the catalytic effect on MgH₂. In order to clarify this mechanism, the effect of LiH on the hydriding/dehydriding kinetics and thermodynamics of MgH₂ was systematically investigated. The hydrogenation kinetics of LiH-doped samples, as well as the morphology after several cycles, was similar to those of pure MgH₂, which indicate that Li⁺ had no catalytic effect on the hydrogenation of Mg. Moreover, the addition of LiH strongly retarded the hydrogen desorption of MgH₂ doped with/without Nb₂O₅, and resulted in higher starting temperature of desorption, larger activation energy and larger pressure hysteresis of PCI curves of MgH₂. H₂, HD and D₂ were observed in the desorption products of MgH₂-2LiD, which confirms that H–H exchange indeed occurs between MgH₂ and LiH, hence deteriorate desorption kinetics/thermodynamics of MgH_2. The results implied that the additives containing H⁻ could retard the hydrogen desorption of MgH₂ by H–H exchange effect.