Comparison of blood pressure and angiotensin responses to the renin inhibitor Ro 42-5892 and the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril in essential hypertension

OBJECTIVE: To compare the responses of angiotensin II (Ang II) and blood pressure to the renin inhibitor Ro 42-5892 and the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor enalapril. SUBJECTS: Eight non-sodium-restricted patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. DESIGN: A single-blind crossover study. Ro 42-5892 (600 mg orally, once a day) and enalapril (20 mg orally, once a day) were given for 8 days before detailed investigations were carried out. METHODS: Ambulatory blood pressure was measured directly for 24 h by the Oxford technique on three occasions. Off-treatment and on day 8 of treatment with Ro 42-5892 and with enalapril. Ang II was measured by radioimmunoassay after separation by high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Plasma renin activity and Ang II were lowered by 83% [95% confidence interval (CI) 61-105] and 68% (95% CI 49-87), respectively, 0.5-1 h after Ro 42-5892, but after only 3 h values had returned to baseline. Unlike this rapid and short-term suppression of Ang II, the maximal antihypertensive response to Ro 42-5892 (fall in blood pressure 12.9/9.0 mmHg) occurred only after 6 h. Blood pressure returned to baseline after 8 h. In response to enalapril, Ang II was maximally suppressed by 63% (95% CI 32-94) after 2 h and by 83% (95% CI 76-90) after 8 h. Despite early maximal Ang II suppression, the maximal antihypertensive response to enalapril occurred only after 12 h (fall in blood pressure 25.3/16.3 mmHg). With this compound a significant antihypertensive effect was still present 24 h after dosing. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with enalapril at 20 mg once a day, repeated oral administration of a single dose of Ro 42-5892 at 600 mg caused only short-term suppression of Ang II and blood pressure. Suppression of Ang II and reduction in blood pressure were temporally dissociated, both with the ACE inhibitor and the renin inhibitor. This implies that the blood pressure lowering effect of these inhibitors is caused partly by Ang II suppression outside the circulation.     

Serum angiotensin converting enzyme activity in patients with untreated essential arterial hypertension

The serum angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) in 30 patients with untreated essential arterial hypertension, 30 patients with chronic renal failure accompanied with arterial hypertension and 30 healthy individuals was measured. The subjects of both sexes have been old 35-60 years. The serum ACE activity was determined by the spectrophotometric method, using Hip-Gly-Gly as a substrate. The serum ACE activity significantly increased in patients with arterial hypertension (32.48 +/- 2.02; X +/- SEM) and patients with chronical renal failure accompanied with arterial hypertension (37.10 +/- 1.45) when compared to the healthy individuals (20.83 +/- 1.33). Possible mechanisms of increasing ACE activity with the patients suffering of arterial hypertension are discussed.     

Effects of angiotensin II and losartan in the forearm of patients with essential hypertension

OBJECTIVE: Angiotensin II type 1 receptor-mediated constrictor effects may be modulated by hypertension-related vascular changes, changes in receptor function and in neurohumoral activity. DESIGN: The forearm blood flow (FBF) effects of angiotensin II, methoxamine, and losartan were investigated in essential hypertensive patients. Minimal forearm vascular resistance was measured to determine structural vascular changes. METHODS: Seven hypertensive patients were selected, and seven matched normotensives. Angiotensin II (0.01-10 ng/kg per min) was infused during predilatation by sodium nitroprusside (6.1 +/- 0.6 ng/kg per min) before and during losartan infusion (0.3-3 microg/kg per min). Methoxamine (0.2-2 microg/kg per min) was co-infused with the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor NG-monomethyl-L-arginine. FBF, measured by venous occlusion plethysmography, was expressed as the change in FBF ratio (FBFinfused arm/FBFnon-infused arm). RESULTS: Baseline FBF (infused arm) was increased by sodium nitroprusside from 2.56 +/- 0.80 to 5.46 +/- 0.92 (P<0.05) and from 2.66 +/- 0.25 to 5.42 +/- 0.40 ml/100 ml per min (P<0.05) in the hypertensive and normotensive group, respectively. Baseline forearm vascular resistance (FVR) was higher in the hypertensive than in the normotensive group [51 +/- 8 versus 33 +/- 3 mmHg/ (ml/100 ml per min); P<0.05]. Angiotensin II caused a maximal change in FBF ratio (Emax) by -70 +/- 3 and -72 +/- 6% in the hypertensive and normotensive group, respectively (NS). Tachyphylaxis did not occur. Infusions of losartan at 0.3, 1 and 3 microg/kg per min reduced the Emax values from -70 +/- 3 to -50 +/- 5, -45 +/- 5 and -15 +/- 2%, respectively, in the hypertensive group, and from -72 +/- 6 to -62 +/- 4, -45 +/- 2 and -32 +/- 2%, respectively, in the normotensive group (NS). Infusion of methoxamine significantly reduced the FBF ratio by -58 +/- 6 and -69 +/- 5% in the hypertensive and normotensive groups, respectively (NS). Minimal FVR, after forearm ischemia, was the same in hypertensives and normotensives, namely 3.2 +/- 0.7 and 3.2 +/- 0.4 mmHg/(ml per 100 ml per min), respectively (NS). CONCLUSIONS: Angiotensin II type 1- and alpha1-mediated vascular effects were unchanged by essential hypertension. Baseline FVR was greater in the hypertensives than in the normotensives, while minimal FVR was the same. These results indicate that the forearm vascular bed of the patient group studied does not show important structural and renin-angiotensin system-related functional changes as a result of hypertension.     

Angioedema associated with angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan

Angioedema has not been associated with losartan therapy in hemodialysis patients, as it has been with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. We report the case of a hemodialysis patient who previously had angioedema after therapy with ACE inhibitors and again had angioedema while taking losartan. We suggest caution in using losartan in patients with known sensitivity to ACE inhibitors manifested by angioedema.     

Influence of the angiotensin II antagonist valsartan on left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with essential hypertension

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) represents an independent risk factor in patients with essential hypertension. Because reversal of LVH may be associated with an improvement of prognosis, the influence of new antihypertensive compounds, such as angiotensin II AT1 receptor antagonists, on LVH should be determined. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a randomized, double-blind trial, 69 predominantly previously untreated hypertensive patients with echocardiographically proven LVH, ie, left ventricular mass index (LVMI) >134 g/m2 in men and >110 g/m2 in women and/or end-diastolic septal thickness >12 mm, received either the angiotensin II antagonist valsartan or atenolol for 8 months. Echocardiographic data of 58 patients were available. After 8 months of valsartan treatment (n=29), LVMI decreased from 127+/-23 to 106+/-25 g/m2 (ratio [R]=0.83; 95% CI, 0.79 to 0.87; P<0.0001 versus baseline). Under atenolol (n=29), LVMI decreased to a smaller extent, from 127+/-25 to 117+/-27 g/m2 (R=0.92; 95% CI, 0.86 to 0.98; P=0.0082 versus baseline). The mean reduction of LVMI came to 21 g/m2 under valsartan and only to 10 g/m2 under atenolol (R=0.91; 90% CI, 0.85 to 0.97 versus atenolol). Baseline mean blood pressure values were determined to be 163+/-12/101+/-6 mm Hg before treatment with valsartan and 160+/-14/103+/-6 mm Hg before atenolol treatment. After 8 months of treatment, mean blood pressure decreased to 146+/-13/90+/-7 mm Hg with valsartan and to 147+/-18/90+/-7 mm Hg with atenolol. Nine patients in the valsartan group and 8 patients in the atenolol group required additional medication with hydrochlorothiazide. CONCLUSIONS: Antihypertensive treatment with the angiotensin II antagonist valsartan for 8 months produced a significant regression of LVH in predominantly previously untreated patients with essential hypertension. The drug may be safely administered in this subset of hypertensive patients; however, the long-term benefit in terms of risk reduction has still to be evaluated in further trials.     

The significance of converting enzyme inhibitor angiotensin I to angiotensin II in treatment of patients with coronary disease]

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are now established drugs in the treatment of hypertension and heart failure. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system is complex and acts as a circulating hormonal system, a local endogenous tissue system and neuromodular. Current experimental evidence suggests that ACE inhibitors reduce the risk associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The antiatherogenic action of ACE inhibitors is related to complex effects mediated by these agent, including an antiproliferative and antimitotic action, beneficial effects on endothelial function, plaque-stabilizing effects and the action of these agents on the sympathetic nervous system. The role of ACE inhibitors in preventing the clinical sequale of atherosclerotic cardiac disease has been evaluated in various patient populations. Several small trial assess the effects of ACE inhibitors in severity of angina pectoris have reported conflicting results, with benefit is some patients and no benefit or even exacerbation of angina in others, indicating that ACE inhibitors do not have consistent antianginal effects in short-term study. ACE inhibitors have the theoretical potential to prevent restenosis after PTCA but they do not prevent restenosis and has no effect on overall clinical outcome. New data suggest that ACE inhibitors may be effective therapy fir patients following acute myocardial infarction. The renin-angiotensin system, is activated during new myocardial infarction and has an impact on the process of remodeling of the left ventricle which causes ist dysfunction and heart failure. In most of the large mortality trials the rationale for early treatment with ACE inhibitors after myocardial infarction was stated. ACE inhibitors have a positive effect in preventing the ventricular dilatation and they reduce the rate of reinfarctions and the mortality rate.     

Polymorphism of the angiotensin I converting enzyme gene in essential hypertensive patients

In order to study the relationship between plasma and platelet von Willebrand factor (vWF), we used an experimental model of crossed bone marrow transplantation (BMT) between SLA immunocompatible normal and homozygous von Willebrand (vWD) pigs. A normal pig received bone marrow from a vWD pig and a second pig with vWD was engrafted with marrow from a normal pig. Each recipient, after total irradiation of 10 Grays, received by a central catheter 10(10) monocellular bone marrow cells without immunosuppression. The animals were followed for 50 d and no graft rejection or graft-versus-host disease was observed. After aplasia occurring 3 weeks after BMT, white blood cells and platelets returned to normal. Before transplantation, in the vWD pig, vWFAg and vWF activity were not detected in plasma and in platelet and megakaryocyte alpha-granules. After transplantation with normal marrow, platelet vWFAg and platelet vWF activity wer normal and high molecular weight multimers and numerous tubular structures were present in alpha-granules. Before transplantation, the normal pig had normal plasma and platelet vWFAg-vWF activity, normal multimeric pattern, and the platelet and megakaryocyte alpha-granules displayed many tubular structures, eccentrically located in one of their poles, coinciding with immunogold staining vWFAg. After transplantation with homozygous vWD marrow, platelet and megakaryocyte alpha-granules lacked tubular structures. Alpha-granule immunogold staining for vWF was consistently negative, although plasma vWF was at a normal level. In conclusion, this study shows that, unlike other plasma proteins such as fibrinogen. vWF endocytosis does not occur from plasma to the platelet alpha-granules. Platelet and megakaryocyte vWF solely originates from megakaryocyte endogenous synthesis and is independent of plasma vWF.     

Treatment of essential arterial hypertension with hypercholesterolemia. Effects of an alpha-adrenergic blocker and an inhibitor of the angiotensin converting enzyme

BACKGROUND: Hypertension and hypercholesterolemia are frequently associated with this leading to considerable cardiovascular risk. METHODS: An open parallel randomized study was performed in which the effects of doxazosin, an alpha-adrenergic blocker and enalapril, an inhibitor of the angiotensin converting enzyme were compared in 70 patients with essential high blood pressure and plasma cholesterol levels greater than 240 mg/dl. Following 2-4 weeks of placebo administration the patients were randomly treated with one of the two drugs. When required doses were increased and hydrochlorothiazide added until blood pressure lower than 160/95 mmHg was achieved. After this period the patients were observed for a minimum of 8 weeks. The mean length of the study was of 22 weeks. RESULTS: Both drugs significantly reduced blood pressure without modifying cardiac frequency. Doxazosin tended to favorably modify the lipid profile of the plasma while enalapril significantly reduced the levels of cholesterol, lipids and high density lipoproteins (HDL). Upon termination of the study the total HDL/cholesterol index increased 8.6% in those treated with doxazosin and decreased 5.5% in those receiving enalapril (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although doxazosin and enalapril are potent antihypertensive drugs, the effects on plasma lipid obtained with doxazosin indicate that a reduction in cardiovascular risk was achieved with this drug in the patients included in this study.     

Cardioprotective effect of enalapril in renovascular and angiotensin II hypertension

The influence of chronic treatment with enalapril or losartan (10 or 30 mg/kg/24h, respectively) on cardiac mass was evaluated in one-kidney, one clip (1K-1C) hypertensive rats submitted to sodium restriction 3 weeks after clipping and in rats infused for 10 days with angiotensin II (ANGII: 200 ng/kg/min). In 1K-1C hypertension, cardiac mass and arterial pressure were reduced to a similar extent by enalapril and losartan. In ANGII hypertension, enalapril and losartan blunted the increase in cardiac mass whereas losartan but not enalapril prevented the development of hypertension. The cardioprotective effect of enalapril was attenuated by concomitant blockade of bradykinin receptors (Hoe140: 300 micrograms/kg/24h) in both models. The beneficial influence of enalapril on cardiac mass appears to be independent of its effect on blood pressure and ANGII generation and seems partly mediated by endogenous bradykinin in these high ANGII models of hypertension.     

The angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors captopril and enalapril inhibit apomorphine-induced oral stereotypy in the rat

The possible functional interaction between angiotensin and dopamine mechanisms in the rat was investigated by examining the effects of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors captopril and enalapril on apomorphine-induced stereotypy. Apomorphine-induced behaviour was observed, and recorded using a keypad linked to a microcomputer. In agreement with previous findings, low doses of apomorphine induced a syndrome of vacuous mouth movements, penile grooming, yawning and immobility whereas at higher doses the yawning syndrome disappeared to be replaced with sniffing, licking and gnawing. Two antagonism studies were carried out. In the first the effects of captopril on apomorphine-induced behaviour were compared with those of the classical neuroleptic haloperidol, and in the second dose-response curves for the effects of captopril and enalapril on apomorphine-induced behaviour were determined. Captopril had no effect on the apomorphine-induced yawning syndrome whereas this was blocked by haloperidol. In contrast, both captopril and haloperidol blocked oral stereotypy (licking and gnawing) induced by apomorphine but had no effect on sniffing induced by the dopamine agonist. Selective blockade of apomorphine-induced oral stereotypy by angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition was confirmed in the second study in which both captopril and enalapril were observed to antagonize apomorphine-induced gnawing. The inhibition of apomorphine-induced gnawing by enalapril correlated with inhibition of brain angiotensin converting enzyme, but not lung angiotensin converting enzyme, by the drug as assessed by ex vivo penetration studies. These data suggest that angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition modulates the expression of apomorphine-induced oral stereotypy, a response that is thought to be mediated by postsynaptic dopamine receptors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Uricosuric effect of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan in heart transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: The angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan is an effective antihypertensive agent with unique uricosuric properties. This study evaluates the uricosuric effects of losartan in 10 hypertensive heart transplant patients with hyperuricemia. METHODS: The patients were randomized to receive losartan 50 mg once daily and enalapril 20 mg once daily for 4 weeks according to a double-blind crossover design. Office blood pressure, plasma uric acid levels, and urinary uric acid excretion were monitored throughout the study. RESULTS: Plasma uric acid levels decreased significantly after 4 weeks of treatment with losartan (P<0.05) but not with enalapril. On day 1 and after 1 month of treatment, a significant increase in uric acid excretion was observed only with losartan. Significant decreases in office systolic and diastolic blood pressures were obtained with enalapril but not with losartan. CONCLUSIONS: Losartan effectively lowers plasma uric acid levels in hyperuricemic heart transplant patients.     

Inhibition of angiotensin converting enzyme from sheep tissues by captopril, lisinopril and enalapril

Inhibition of angiotensin converting enzyme(EC 3.4,15.1, ACE) in presence of captopril, lisinopril and enalapril were investigated in kidney, lung and serum of sheep using Hip-His-Leu(HHL) as substrate. The activity in kidney, lung and serum was inhibited at HHL concentration above 5 mM. The inhibitory constants (IC50) ranged between 5.6 nM for serum ACE with lisinopril and 70000 nM for renal ACE with enalapril while Ki ranged from 1.0 nM for serum ACE with lisinopril to 12000 nM for kidney ACE with enalapril. Differences in inhibition observed in different tissues suggest that the inhibitors may block function(s) of ACE to varying degrees in each tissue.     

Dietary protein restriction in combination with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor improves insulin resistance in patients with chronic renal disease

Insulin resistance (IR) and secondary hyperinsulinaemia are major risk factors of atherosclerosis and probably also of related glomerulosclerosis. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), while improving IR in essential hypertension, do not improve it in patients with chronic renal disease. Thus, the combination of ACEI and low protein diet was evaluated. Thirty-eight patients with various kidney diseases and mild to moderate impairment of kidney function were included in the study. Thirteen of them suffered from IR. Their dietary protein intake was decreased from > or = 1.0 g/kg/d to 0.6-0.7 g/kg/d. Moreover, they were treated by ACEI enalapril at dosages of 2-10 mg/d depending on the absence/presence and severity of hypertension. The patients were followed for 8 months. No clinically relevant kidney disease progression (KDP) was found. IR patients improved remarkably. IR was examined by the oral glucose tolerance test and glucose, insulin and C-peptide determinations. Their increased plasma triglyceride, VLDL concentrations and proteinuria decreased, HDL concentration increased. Acid-base balance and anaemia did not change. It is concluded that protein restriction in combination with ACEI treatment improve IR and the associated dyslipoproteinaemia and proteinuria.     

The mechanisms of the improvement of insulin sensitivity by angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor

To investigate the role of kinins in augmentation of insulin sensitivity by angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), the effects of ACEI (delapril) on the insulin resistance in fructose-fed rats (FFR) were evaluated with or without the administration of bradykinin receptor antagonist (Hoe 140). Male Sprague-Dawley rats were fed on fructose rich chow (FFR) or standard chow (control) for 4 weeks and treated with 10 mg/kg/day of delapril with or without Hoe 140 (0.5 mg/kg/day) for an additional 2 weeks. Steady state plasma glucose (SSPG) and steady state plasma insulin (SSPI) were determined while the rats were conscious. Insulin (2.5 mU/kg/min) and glucose (8 mg/kg/min) were simultaneously infused to determine insulin sensitivity in each group. Mean blood pressure (MBP), SSPG and SSPI were significantly higher in FFR than in control, and were significantly lower in the FFR+delapril than in FFR+vehicle. There were no difference in MBP, SSPG and SSPI between FFR+delapril+vehicle and FFR+delapril+Hoe 140. We concluded that the main mechanisms of improving the insulin sensitivity by ACEI may not be the enhancement of kinins but the suppression of angiotensin II in FFR.     

The effects of a converting enzyme inhibitor (captopril) and angiotensin II on fetal renal function

1. Renal function was studied in chronically catheterized fetal sheep (119-128 days gestation), before and during treatment of the ewe with the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, captopril, which crosses the placenta and blocks the fetal renin angiotensin system. 2. An i.v. dose of 15 mg (about 319 micrograms kg-1) of captopril to salt-replete ewes followed by an infusion to the ewe of 6 mg h-1 (about 128 micrograms kg-1 h-1) caused a fall in fetal arterial pressure (P < 0.01), and a rise in fetal renal blood flow (RBF) from 67.9 +/- 5.6 to 84.9 +/- 8.3 ml min-1 (mean +/- s.e. mean) (P < 0.05). Renal vascular resistance and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) fell (P < 0.01); fetal urine flow (P < 0.01); fetal urine flow (P < 0.01) and sodium excretion declined (P < 0.05). 3. Ewes were treated for the next 2 days with 15 mg captopril twice daily. On the 4th day, 15 mg was given to the ewe and fetal renal function studied for 2 h during the infusion of captopril (6 mg h-1) to the ewe. Of the 9 surviving fetuses, 3 were anuric and 3 had low urine flow rates. When 6 micrograms kg-1 h-1 of angiotensin II was infused directly into the fetus RBF fell from 69 +/- 10.1 ml min-1 to 31 +/- 13.9 ml min-1, GFR rose (P < 0.05) and urine flow (P < 0.01) and sodium excretion increased in all fetuses. 4. It is concluded that the small fall in fetal arterial pressure partly contributed to the fall in fetal GFR but in addition, efferent arteriolar tone fell so that the filtration pressure fell further. Thus maintenance of fetal renal function depends on the integrity of the fetal renin angiotensin system. These findings explain why use of ACE inhibitors in human pregnancy is associated with neonatal anuria.     

Biochemical effects of losartan, a nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonist, on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in hypertensive patients

We investigated the effects of angiotensin II (Ang II) type 1 receptor blockade with losartan on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in hypertensive patients (supine diastolic blood pressure, 95 to 110 mm Hg). Qualifying patients (n = 51) were allocated to placebo, 25 or 100 mg losartan, or 20 mg enalapril. Blood pressure, plasma drug concentrations, and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system mediators were measured on 4 inpatient days: end of placebo run-in, after first dose, and 2 and 6 weeks of treatment. Plasma drug concentrations were similar after the first and last doses of losartan. At 6 weeks, 100 mg losartan and 20 mg enalapril showed comparable antihypertensive activity. Four hours after dosing, compared with the run-in day, 100 mg losartan increased plasma renin activity 1.7-fold and Ang II 2.5-fold, whereas enalapril increased plasma renin activity 2.8-fold and decreased Ang II 77%. Both drugs decreased plasma aldosterone concentration. For losartan, plasma renin activity and Ang II increases were greater at 2 than at 6 weeks. Effects of losartan were dose related. After the last dose of losartan, plasma renin activity and Ang II changes were similar to placebo changes by 36 hours. These results indicate that long-term blockade of the feedback Ang II receptor in hypertensive patients produces modest increases of plasma renin activity and Ang II that do not appear to affect the antihypertensive response to the antagonist.     

Renal protection and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition in microalbuminuric type I and type II diabetic patients

BACKGROUND: Many studies have emphasized the role of antihypertensive drugs and in particular angiotension converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in the retardation of diabetic nephropathy. Although these studies have focused predominantly on patients with overt proteinuria, more recently a number of investigators have explored the role of ACE inhibitors in both type I and type II diabetic patients with an earlier phase of diabetic renal disease known as microalbuminuria. These agents are now being considered as renoprotective agents not only in hypertensive patients but also in those with 'normal' blood pressure. Initially, studies in type I diabetic patients showed that ACE inhibition was effective in retarding the increase in albuminuria which was observed in placebo treated groups. More recently, several multi-centre placebo controlled studies have been performed suggesting that prolonged treatment not only reduced albuminuria but also preserved renal function. The role of ACE inhibition in microalbuminuric type II diabetic patients is less well characterised although several studies have recently described beneficial effects of ACE inhibition on albuminuria and possibly on renal function. REVIEW: Although ACE inhibitors have been clearly shown to reduce urinary albumin excretion in diabetic patients, the issue as to whether they confer a specific benefit over other classes of antihypertensive agents remains controversial. Several meta-analyses have suggested that ACE inhibitors are more potent at decreasing albuminuria or proteinuria than other antihypertensive agents, for a given reduction in blood pressure. The Melbourne Diabetic Nephropathy Study Group has instituted a study which is placebo-controlled and is confined to normotensive type I and type II diabetic patients. The ACE inhibitor perindopril has been compared not only with placebo but also with the dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, nifedipine. Preliminary analysis reveals that after 12 and 24 months of treatment, perindopril is more effective in reducing albuminuria than placebo or nifedipine. CONCLUSION: ACE inhibitors are a promising class of antihypertensive agents in diabetic patients with microalbuminuria. These drugs should be considered as first line agents in such patients, even in the absence of systemic hypertension.     

Renal and depressor activities of inhibitors of neutral endopeptidase and angiotensin converting enzyme in monkeys infused with angiotensin II

In a previous study, the depressor activity of combined selective inhibitors of neutral endopeptidase EC 3.4.24.11 (NEP) and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) depended on the level of ACE inhibition, whereas the renal responses were determined by NEP inhibition. Our study confirmed that a mixed NEP/ACE inhibitor BMS-182657 ([S-(R*,R*)]-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-3-[(2-mercapto-1-oxo-3- phenylpropyl)amino]-2-oxo-1H-benzazepine-1-acetic acid) reduced mean arterial pressure (MAP) when renin release was reduced by a sodium load, suggesting that the depressor response did not require suppression of endogenous angiotensin II generation. Furthermore, a pressor dose of 30 ng/min of angiotensin II was required to block the depressor response to BMS-182657 in the presence or absence of exogenous human atrial natriuretic peptide (hANP 99-126). Thirty ng/min of angiotensin II also significantly enhanced the natriuresis induced by hANP 99-126 after BMS-182657 administration. In contrast, a nonpressor dose of angiotensin II (3 ng/min) reduced basal sodium excretion and the natriuretic responses to exogenous hANP 99-126 in the presence or absence of BMS-182657. The potentiation of the urinary ANP and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) responses to hANP 99-126 by BMS-182657 was similar for all doses of angiotensin II; therefore angiotensin did not alter the effects of BMS-182657 on ANP metabolism or cGMP accumulation in the kidney. In summary, the renal responses to mixed metalloprotease inhibitors were apparently mediated by ANP potentiation and were modulated by angiotensin II. The depressor activity depended on ACE inhibition but was not mediated solely by reductions in endogenous angiotensin II levels.     

Induction of angiotensin converting enzyme and angiotensin II receptors in the atherosclerotic aorta of high-cholesterol fed Cynomolgus monkeys

Psychometric characteristics of the Social Introversion (Si) scale, the Social Discomfort (SOD) scale, and the Si subscales of the MMPI-2 were examined in clinical samples of 122 psychiatric patients and 399 patients with substance-use disorders. The combined Si1 (Shyness/Self-Consciousness) and Si2 (Social Avoidance) subscales correlated highly with SOD and are apparent measures of the social introversion construct. Si3 (Self/Other Alienation) was found to be a measure of the general maladjustment factor of the MMPI-2. Content not included on the Si subscales was divided into a group of items that measures general maladjustment and 2 other item groups that may assess minor constructs related to social introversion. As in previous research, the 3 Si subscales accounted well for variance in Si scores.     

Effect of losartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, on portal pressure in cirrhosis

Administration of angiotensin II causes an increase in portal pressure, and plasma concentration of angiotensin II is elevated in patients with cirrhosis, suggesting that angiotensin II may be involved in the pathogenesis of portal hypertension in cirrhosis. We evaluated the effect of the orally active angiotensin II receptor antagonist, losartan, on portal pressure in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Thirty patients with severe (hepatic venous pressure gradient [HVPG] >/= 20 mm Hg) and 15 patients with moderate (HVPG < 20 mm Hg) portal hypertension at baseline measurement were treated with an oral dose of 25 mg losartan once daily for 1 week and compared with 15 (HVPG >/= 20 mm Hg) and 10 (HVPG < 20 mm Hg), respectively, cirrhotic controls. On the seventh day, HVPG was determined again, and blood pressure, heart rate, body weight, and parameters of liver and kidney function were recorded. Losartan induced a significant (P <.001) decrease of HVPG in the patients with severe (-46.8% +/- 15.5%) and moderate (-44.1% +/- 14.7%) portal hypertension, while no significant change was seen in the controls. Losartan caused a slight but significant (P <.01) fall in mean arterial blood pressure (-3.1 +/- 5.0 and -3.5 +/- 4.3 mm Hg, respectively). One patient treated with losartan had a short symptomatic hypotensive reaction after the first dose of losartan that did not recur despite continued treatment. No deterioration of liver or kidney function was observed. The present study indicates that angiotensin II blockade with orally administered losartan is safe and highly effective in the treatment of portal hypertension.