Active trunk stiffness during voluntary isometric flexion and extension exertions

OBJECTIVE: Compare muscle activity and trunk stiffness during isometric trunk flexion and extension exertions. BACKGROUND: Elastic stiffness of the torso musculature is considered the primary stabilizing mechanism of the spine. Therefore, stiffness of the trunk during voluntary exertions provides insight into the stabilizing control of pushing and pulling tasks. METHODS: Twelve participants maintained an upright posture against external flexion and extension loads applied to the trunk. Trunk stiffness, damping, and mass were determined from the dynamic relation between pseudorandom force disturbances and subsequent small-amplitude trunk movements recorded during the voluntary exertions. Muscle activity was recorded from rectus abdominus, external oblique, lumbar paraspinal, and internal oblique muscle groups. RESULTS: Normalized electromyographic activity indicated greater antagonistic muscle recruitment during flexion exertions than during extension. Trunk stiffness was significantly greater during flexion exertions than during extension exertions despite similar levels of applied force. Trunk stiffness increased with exertion effort. CONCLUSION: Theoretical and empirical analyses reveal that greater antagonistic cocontraction is required to maintain spinal stability during trunk flexion exertions than during extension exertions. Measured differences in active trunk stiffness were attributed to antagonistic activity during flexion exertions with possible contributions from spinal kinematics and muscle lines of action. APPLICATION: When compared with trunk extension exertions, trunk flexion exertions such as pushing tasks require unique neuromuscular control that is not simply explained by differences in exertion direction. Biomechanical analyses of flexion tasks must consider the stabilizing muscle recruitment patterns when evaluating spinal compression and shear loads.     

Biomechanical analysis for handle stability during maximum push and pull exertions

This study investigated the effect of handle stability on maximum push/pull force. It was hypothesised that people apply force in directions deviated from the pure push/pull direction to generate a moment that assists producing greater push/pull force when the handle position is fixed (stable) compared to when it is not fixed (unstable). Eight healthy subjects performed maximum push and pull exertions on a stable and an unstable handle in a seated posture, while maximum push/pull force, vertical force and lateral force were recorded. For the unstable handle, vertical and lateral forces were not different from zero during push and pull. For the stable handle, subjects intuitively applied significant downward force during push and significant upward force during pull exertions. As predicted from biomechanical analysis, this downward and upward force was found to be significantly associated with increased push and pull force, respectively, for the stable handle compared to the unstable handle.     

Investigation of the transmission of fore and aft vibration through the human body

Understanding the behavior of human body under the influence of vibration is of great importance for the optimal motor vehicle system design. Therefore, great efforts are being done in order to discover as many information about the influence of vibration on human body as possible. So far the references show that the major scientific attention has been paid to vertical vibration, although intensive research has been performed lately on the other sorts of excitation. In this paper, the results of the investigation of behavior of human body, in seated position, under the influence of random fore and aft vibration are shown. The investigation is performed by the use of an electro-hydraulic simulator, on a group of 30 healthy male occupants.Experiments are performed in order to give results to improve human body modeling in driving conditions. Excitation amplitudes (1.75 and 2.25 m/s² rms) and seat backrest conditions (with and without inclination) were varied. Data results are analyzed by partial coherence and transfer functions. Analyses have been performed and results are given in detail.The results obtained have shown that the human body under the influence of random excitations behaves as a non-linear system and its response depends on spatial position.Obtained results give necessary data to define structure and parameters of human biodynamic model with respect to different excitation and seat backrest position.     

Human strength: measurements of maximum isometric forces in industry

Within the framework of an on-going research project, the maximum isometric forces of staff working in production were measured for nine test conditions representative for manual material handling (n=3600), The technique for the measurement of maximum human forces depending on body posture, the test set-up, and the procedures used for data analysis plus the preliminary group results (n=1245) are described. The results show a marked influence of the initial grip height on the maximum forces achievable for the lifting of a stacking case with both hands. Under comparable grip height and type of grip, small differences between the lifting forces with one or with two hands exist. In comparison to males, females clearly have lower maximum isometric forces than is generally supposed.     

Human strength: measurements of maximum isometric forces in industry

Abstract

Within the framework of an on-going research project, the maximum isometric forces of staff working in production were measured for nine test conditions representative for manual material handling (n = 3600). The technique for the measurement of maximum human forces depending on body posture, the test setup, and the procedures used for data analysis plus the preliminary group results (n = 1245) are described. The results show a marked influence of the initial grip height on the maximum forces achievable for the lifting of a stacking case with both hands. Under comparable grip height and type of grip, small differences between the lifting forces with one or with two hands exist. In comparison to males, females clearly have lower maximum isometric forces than is generally supposed.     

Maximum frequency acceptable to female workers for one-handed lifts in the horizontal plane

Abstract

A laboratory study was conducted to determine the maximum frequencies acceptable to female workers for one-handed lifts in the horizontal plane. A psychophysical method was used to determine maximum acceptable frequency for an 8-hour workday. Ten female college students were required to lift continuously three different loads to two different reach distances (38 and 63 cm) on a 91 cm high work table. The lifting task was paced by a repeating timer which the subject controlled according to her subjective feelings of fatigue. Heart rate and RPE were measured during the last 5min of the experiment to determine the physiological level of functioning and perceived exertion. Psychophysically determined maximum acceptable frequencies were compared with the standards based on methods-time measurement (MTM) analysis.

Statistical analysis showed that both the weight of the load and reach distance had a significant effect on maximum frequency acceptable to the subjects. No single value for percentage of maximum frequency can be used to establish permissible one-handed lift limits in women; rather, this value depends upon the weight of the object and distance of lift. The average maximum acceptable frequency was 51% of the maximum frequency that the subjects could maintain for a period of 4min. The subjects selected workloads which resulted in a mean heart rate of 101 beats/min. The subjects rated the perceived exertion ranging from ‘fairly light’ to ‘somewhat hard’. Performance based on MTM analysis ranged from 11% below to 32% above the maximum workload acceptable to the subjects. The non-significant heart rate differences found among the six load-distance combinations lend strong support for the use of psychophysical methodology in future studies of fatigue criteria. The study also supports the previous findings that separate physiological fatigue criteria are needed for tasks involving arm work and whole body exertion.     

A study of the difference between nominal and actual hand forces in two-handed sagittal plane whole-body exertions

Given a task posture, changes in hand force magnitude and direction with regard to joint locations result in variations in joint loads. Previous work has quantified considerable vertical force components during push/pull exertions. The objective of this work was to quantify and statistically model actual hand forces in two-hand, standing exertions relative to the required nominal horizontal and vertical hand forces for a population of widely varying stature and strength. A total of 19 participants exerted force on a fixed handle while receiving visual feedback on the magnitude of force exerted in the required horizontal or vertical direction. A set of regression equations with adjusted R(2) values ranging from 0.20 to 0.66 were developed to define actual hand force vectors by predicting off-axis forces from the required hand force magnitude. Off-axis forces significantly increase the overall magnitude of force exerted in two-hand push/pull and up/down standing force exertions. STATEMENT OF RELEVANCE: This study quantifies and statistically models actual hand forces in two-hand, standing exertions. Inaccuracies in hand force estimates affect the ability to accurately assess task-oriented strength capability. Knowledge of the relationship between nominal and actual hand forces can be used to improve existing ergonomic analysis tools, including biomechanical simulations of manual tasks.     

The effects of a back belt on posture, strength, and spinal compressive force during static lift exertions

The experiment reported in this paper evaluated changes in lifting posture, static lifting strength and the estimated L3/L4 spinal compressive force resulting from the use of an abdominal support or ‘back' belt. Torso posture and maximum static lift strength were measured for eight male and eight female subjects using symmetric and asymmetric hand positions at calf height and elbow height. Body posture, and hand forces were also used as input to a three-dimensional static biomechanical model of the torso used to estimate L3/L4 spinal compressive force. The results showed axial twist of the torso to be significantly lower for calf height asymmetric exertions when the abdominal support belt was worn. The measured reduction in axial twist was approximately four degrees. No other significant effects on posture due to the support belt were found. Static lift strength was not significantly increased or reduced when the support belt was used. Predicted spinal compressive force was significantly lower when a support belt was worn (2840 N compared to 3125 N when the belt was not worn). Overall, the results of the experiment demonstrate a very limited benefit to the user of abdominal support belts, primarily due to reduced or restricted motion during asymmetric and lower-level lifts.Relevance to industryBack belts are commonly used in industry to mitigate manual materials handling hazards. One assumption often made by those recommending the use of back belts is that they substantially reduce the bending and twisting of the torso. The experiment reported in this paper tests this assumption and provides information on the utility of back belts.     

Normative data on the one-handed static pull strength of a Chinese population and a comparison with American data

We assess the one-handed static pull strength of a Chinese population and compare it to that of an American sample. Fifty men and 50 women in five age groups were asked to exert their maximum one-handed pull strength in three pulling directions (across, front and side) and from four pulling heights (61 cm, 76 cm, waist height and above-shoulder height). The results showed that women had less pull strength than men under all of the conditions tested. The front and side pulling resulted in the greatest pull strength, with a decrease detected when the pulling height was increased. The American sample exhibited greater strength than the Chinese. Body mass and men’s handgrip force were also associated with the pull strength. These variables should be taken into account in the development of tasks related to one-handed pulling.

Practitioner summary:

In this paper, we report a laboratory-based experiment conducted to assess the one-handed static pull strength of a Chinese population and compare the results with those of an American population. The variables associated with pull strength included gender, pulling direction, pulling height, race, body mass and men’s handgrip force.     

The area of glenoid asymmetry identified as important contributor to shoulder strength during pushing and pulling in the coronal plane

The geometrical dimensions of the bones that make up the glenohumeral joint could be a key factor in strength predictability. Understanding the mechanical influence of these dimensions (individually or in combination) on shoulder strength could help explain the mechanism of musculoskeletal disorders. The following study shows how a recently discovered geometric parameter, the area of glenoid asymmetry (AGA), is a good indicator of shoulder strength. A comprehensive study was conducted to test whether glenohumeral geometry, as measured through MRI scans, is correlated with upper arm strength. The isometric shoulder strength of 12 subjects during one-handed arm abduction and adduction in the coronal plane, in a range from 5 to 30 degrees , was correlated with the geometries of their glenoid fossae. All subjects were stronger during adduction than abduction for all arm positions. The results revealed a high correlation in the coronal plane between the AGA and mean maximum force and mean maximum moment when an arm was abducted and adducted in a range from 5 degrees to 30 degrees (0.80, p 相似文献   

Relationships between psychophysically acceptable and maximum voluntary hand force capacity in the context of underlying biomechanical limitations

This research investigated if proportional relationships between psychophysically acceptable and maximum voluntary hand forces are dependent on the underlying biomechanical factor (i.e. whole body balance or joint strength) that limited the maximum voluntary hand force. Eighteen healthy males completed two unilateral maximal exertions followed by a 30 min psychophysical load-adjust protocol in each of nine pre-defined standing scenarios. Center of pressure (whole body balance) and joint moments (joint strength) were calculated to evaluate whether balance or joint strength was most likely limiting maximum voluntary hand force. The ratio of the psychophysically acceptable force to the maximal force was significantly different depending on the underlying biomechanical factor. Psychophysically acceptable hand forces were selected at 86.3 ± 19.7% of the maximum voluntary hand force when limited by balance (pulling exertions), 67.5 ± 15.2% when limited by joint strength (downward pressing) and 78 ± 23% when the limitation was undefined in medial exertions.     

Effects of age and gender on maximum voluntary range of motion of the upper body joints

The maximum voluntary range of motion (ROM) of the major joints of the upper body was studied in a seated position and compared between young and elderly subjects. A total of 41 subjects (22 young male and female subjects aged 25 to 35 years, 19 elderly male and female subjects aged 65 to 80 years) took part in the experiment. In total, 13 maximum voluntary joint motions were performed by each subject. Age was found to have a non-uniform effect on the ROM of the joints investigated in this study. Its effect on ROM was joint specific and motion specific. The highest loss in ROM was observed in the neck and trunk, especially for neck extension, lateral flexion and axial rotation as well as for trunk lateral flexion and axial rotation. No significant age differences were observed in the elbow and wrist joint ROMs. The effect of gender on joint ROM was much weaker than that of age. Only four among the 26 joint ROMs investigated in this study were significantly different between the two gender groups.     

Effects of age and gender on maximum voluntary range of motion of the upper body joints

The maximum voluntary range of motion (ROM) of the major joints of the upper body was studied in a seated position and compared between young and elderly subjects. A total of 41 subjects (22 young male and female subjects aged 25 to 35 years, 19 elderly male and female subjects aged 65 to 80 years) took part in the experiment. In total, 13 maximum voluntary joint motions were performed by each subject. Age was found to have a non-uniform effect on the ROM of the joints investigated in this study. Its effect on ROM was joint specific and motion specific. The highest loss in ROM was observed in the neck and trunk, especially for neck extension, lateral flexion and axial rotation as well as for trunk lateral flexion and axial rotation. No significant age differences were observed in the elbow and wrist joint ROMs. The effect of gender on joint ROM was much weaker than that of age. Only four among the 26 joint ROMs investigated in this study were significantly different between the two gender groups.     

Reproducibility of subjectively graded voluntary isometric muscle strength in unilateral and simultaneous bilateral exertion

Reproduction error of voluntary isometric muscle strength that was graded subjectively by the subject was investigated under unilateral and bilateral conditions. Six kinds of tasks, i.e. elbow flexion, elbow extension, hand grip, second digit abduction, knee extension and leg extension were employed. It was clear that absolute error (AE) increased with increase of exerted muscle strength in both unilateral and bilateral conditions. Mean of AE in each task was 4-5% of maximal muscle strength in the task in unilateral conditions. Algebraic or constant error (CE) decreased with increase of exerted strength. Demands for smaller strength tended to overshoot and larger ones tended to undershoot. In bilateral conditions when the different levels of strength for each limb were required to be exerted, AE on the weaker side tended to be larger than that in unilateral conditions. Thus a possibility that magnitude of AE might be affected by amount of attention was suggested. The subjectively graded criterion strength for a specific required level, when the strength was expressed as relative to the maximal strength, was almost the same in every task within a subject although it was different between subjects. It is suggested that each subject might have an awareness of relative magnitude of exerted strength.     

Identification of the maximum acceptable frequencies of upper‐extremity motions in the sagittal plane

The present study examined the maximum acceptable frequencies (MAFs; motions/min) of upper‐extremity motions in the sagittal plane at different forces. A dumbbell of 9.8 or 39.2 N was rotated by the arm about the shoulder, the forearm about the elbow, and the hand about the wrist; a dynamometer was pressed to 2.45 or 9.8 N by the index finger. Seventeen right‐handed Korean men in their 20s without any history of musculoskeletal disorders received 1 hour of individual training and conducted each upper‐extremity task for 30 minutes a day, assuming they were on an incentive basis. The participants determined their MAFs for 8 hours of work by the self‐adjustment method, and work pulse (change in heart rate; beats per minute [bpm]) and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were measured. For a limited set of conditions, the reproducibility of the MAF experimental protocol was found satisfactory (r = 0.97; interclass correlation coefficient > 0.95). The average MAFs of arm, forearm, hand, and index finger motions were 24, 45, 56, and 128 at their low force level and 9, 20, 30, and 66 at their high force level. The average work pulses of arm, forearm, and hand motions were 3.0, 2.1, and 1.5 times that of index finger motion (4.2 bpm at their low force level and 5.7 bpm at their high force level). The maximum average RPEs at the upper‐extremity regions ranged from 2.1 (weak) to 3.1 (moderate) in Borg's CR‐10 scale. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Computation of the maximum flow rate of a perfect gas through a slit in a plane wall

The steady flow of a perfect gas through a slit in a plane wall is studied. The pressure conditions are such that the flow is near its maximum rate, and the flow is transonic. The flow is assumed to have no shocks near the wall, and the equations are formulated in a potential-stream function-coordinate system. The coordinate system is then transformed, and the equations are solved with a finite-difference method using second order accurate, central differences all over the domain. The resulting nonlinear system is solved using Newton's method. By computing a certain characteristic it is determined when changes in the pressure no longer influences the inflow side. This is used to estimate the maximum flow rate. The numerical computations were performed on the vector computers CYBER 203 and CYBER 205.     

Evaluation of the loading of neck and shoulder musculature in overhead pushing and pulling exertions

Despite substantial epidemiological evidence relating overhead exertions with work‐related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSD) of the neck, effects of such exertions on the loading of neck or cervical spine musculature are not well understood. In this study, the effects of overhead pushing and pulling exertions on the loading of the cervical spine were evaluated using electromyography (EMG) and subjective discomfort ratings. Additionally, the role of gender as well as individual strength on the loading of neck musculature during such exertions was evaluated. Twenty‐four healthy individuals (12 men and 12 women) participated in this study. Each participant performed overhead pushing and pulling exertions, exerting 25%, 50%, and 75% of their respective maximum strengths. Overhead pushing exertions were found to be significantly more strenuous to the neck musculature than were the pulling exertions. Gender had no significant effect on the activities of the neck muscles. Participants with high strength, however, were able to exert more force at comparatively low muscle activation levels. Subjective discomfort ratings were strongly correlated with the EMG data. At various workplaces, avoiding overhead exertions is rather impossible due to material, interface, and site constraints. Based on the results of this study, however, during such exertions, an interchange between directions of force application could prevent sustained loading of the neck muscles, fatigue, and consequently the probability of neck WMSD incidents. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

The natural angle between the hand and handle and the effect of handle orientation on wrist radial/ulnar deviation during maximal push exertions

The purpose of this experiment was to quantify the natural angle between the hand and a handle, and to investigate three design factors: handle rotation, handle tilt and between-handle width on the natural angle as well as resultant wrist radial/ulnar deviation (‘RUD’) for pushing tasks. Photographs taken of the right upper limb of 31 participants (14 women and 17 men) performing maximal seated push exertions on different handles were analysed. Natural hand/handle angle and RUD were assessed. It was found that all of the three design factors significantly affected natural handle angle and wrist RUD, but participant gender did not. The natural angle between the hand and the cylindrical handle was 65 ± 7°. Wrist deviation was reduced for handles that were rotated 0° (horizontal) and at the narrow width (31 cm). Handles that were tilted forward 15° reduced radial deviation consistently (12–13°) across handle conditions.

Practitioner summary: Manual materials handling (MMH) tasks involving pushing have been related to increased risk of musculoskeletal injury. This study shows that handle orientation influences hand and wrist posture during pushing, and suggests that the design of push handles on carts and other MMH aids can be improved by adjusting their orientation to fit the natural interface between the hand and handle.