An algebraic evaluation method for deduction in incomplete data bases

Strategies used in deductive data bases try as far as possible to replace deduction in Horn clause theories T_S by evaluation of relational algebra formulas in a set of ground atoms. In this paper we extend the relational algebra in order to take into account incomplete databases where incompleteness is represented by Skolem constants. We first define the notion of the extended model EM, similar to the Herbrand model, which is associated to a given theory T_S. Specific satisfiability conditions applied to EM define the link between provability in T_S and satisfiability in EM. Then we define an extended relational algebra to compute every ground instance of a given formula. It is shown that this algebra is always sound, and complete for a particular class of formulas which is not too restrictive.     

Tool Building Requirements for an API to First-Order Solvers

Effective formal verification tools require that robust implementations of automatic procedures for first-order logic and satisfiability modulo theories be integrated into expressive interactive frameworks for logical deduction, such as higher-order logic theorem provers. This paper states some pragmatic requirements for implementations of decision procedures that make them well-suited to integration into such frameworks. The aim is to open a dialogue with the designers of decision procedure software that will lead to greater and easier uptake of their implementations by verification users.     

Theory decision by decomposition

The topic of this article is decision procedures for satisfiability modulo theories (SMT) of arbitrary quantifier-free formulæ. We propose an approach that decomposes the formula in such a way that its definitional part, including the theory, can be compiled by a rewrite-based first-order theorem prover, and the residual problem can be decided by an SMT-solver, based on the Davis–Putnam–Logemann–Loveland procedure. The resulting decision by stages mechanism may unite the complementary strengths of first-order provers and SMT-solvers. We demonstrate its practicality by giving decision procedures for the theories of records, integer offsets and arrays, with or without extensionality, and for combinations including such theories.     

Tree automata with equality constraints modulo equational theories

This paper presents new classes of tree automata combining automata with equality test and automata modulo equational theories. We believe that these classes have a good potential for application in e.g. software verification. These tree automata are obtained by extending the standard Horn clause representations with equational conditions and rewrite systems. We show in particular that a generalized membership problem (extending the emptiness problem) is decidable by proving that the saturation of tree automata presentations with suitable paramodulation strategies terminates. Alternatively our results can be viewed as new decidable classes of first-order formula.     

Combination of convex theories: Modularity,deduction completeness,and explanation

Decision procedures are key components of theorem provers and constraint satisfaction systems. Their modular combination is of prime interest for building efficient systems, but their effective use is often limited by poor interface capabilities, when such procedures only provide a simple “sat/unsat” answer. In this paper, we develop a framework to design cooperation schemas between such procedures while maintaining modularity of their interfaces. First, we use the framework to specify and prove the correctness of classic combination schemas by Nelson–Oppen and Shostak. Second, we introduce the concept of deduction complete satisfiability procedures, we show how to build them for large classes of theories, then we provide a schema to modularly combine them. Third, we consider the problem of modularly constructing explanations for combinations by re-using available proof-producing procedures for the component theories.     

Automated reasoning on UML conceptual schemas with derived information and queries

ContextIt is critical to ensure the quality of a software system in the initial stages of development, and several approaches have been proposed to ensure that a conceptual schema correctly describes the user’s requirements.ObjectiveThe main goal of this paper is to perform automated reasoning on UML schemas containing arbitrary constraints, derived roles, derived attributes and queries, all of which must be specified by OCL expressions.MethodThe UML/OCL schema is encoded in a first order logic formalisation, and an existing reasoning procedure is used to check whether the schema satisfies a set of desirable properties. Due to the undecidability of reasoning in highly expressive schemas, such as those considered here, we also provide a set of conditions that, if satisfied by the schema, ensure that all properties can be checked in a finite period of time.ResultsThis paper extends our previous work on reasoning on UML conceptual schemas with OCL constraints by considering derived attributes and roles that can participate in the definition of other constraints, queries and derivation rules. Queries formalised in OCL can also be validated to check their satisfiability and to detect possible equivalences between them. We also provide a set of conditions that ensure finite reasoning when they are satisfied by the schema under consideration.ConclusionThis approach improves upon previous work by allowing automated reasoning for more expressive UML/OCL conceptual schemas than those considered so far.     

A theory of complete logic programs with equality

Incorporating equality into the unification process has added great power to automated theorem provers. We see a similar trend in logic programming where a number of languages are proposed with specialized or extended unification algorithms. There is a need to give a logical basis to these languages. We present here a general framework for logic programming with definite clauses, equality theories, and generalized unification. The classic results for definite clause logic programs are extended in a simple and natural manner. The extension of the soundness and completeness of the negation-as-failure rule for complete logic programs is conceptually more delicate and represents the main result of this paper.     

Paramodulation with Non-Monotonic Orderings and Simplification

Ordered paramodulation and Knuth-Bendix completion are known to remain complete when using non-monotonic orderings. However, these results do not imply the compatibility of the calculus with essential redundancy elimination techniques such as demodulation, i.e., simplification by rewriting, which constitute the primary mode of computation in most successful automated theorem provers. In this paper we present a complete ordered paramodulation calculus for non-monotonic orderings which is compatible with powerful redundancy notions including demodulation, hence strictly improving the previous results and making the calculus more likely to be used in practice. As a side effect, we obtain a Knuth-Bendix completion procedure compatible with simplification techniques, which can be used for finding, whenever it exists, a convergent term rewrite system for a given set of equations and a (possibly non-totalizable) reduction ordering.     

TSAT++: an Open Platform for Satisfiability Modulo Theories

This paper describes TSAT++, an open platform which realizes the lazy SAT-based approach to Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT). SMT is the problem of determining satisfiability of a propositional combination of T-literals, where T is a first-order theory for which a satisfiability procedure for a set of ground atoms is known. TSAT++ enjoys a modular design in which an enumerator and a theory-specific satisfiability checker cooperate in order to solve SMT. Modularity allows both different enumerators, and satisfiability checkers for different theories (or combinations of theories), to be plugged in, as far as they comply to a simple and well-defined interface. A number of optimization techniques are also implemented in TSAT++, which are independent of the modules used (and of the corresponding theory). Some experimental results are presented, showing that TSAT++, instantiated for Separation Logic, is competitive with, or faster than, state-of-the-art solvers for that very logic.     

Modular instantiation schemes

Instantiation schemes are proof procedures that test the satisfiability of clause sets by instantiating the variables they contain, and testing the satisfiability of the resulting ground set of clauses. Such schemes have been devised for several theories, including fragments of linear arithmetic or theories of data-structures. In this paper we investigate under what conditions instantiation schemes can be combined to solve satisfiability problems in unions of theories.     

一阶子句搜索方法

子句集的可满足性判定是自动证明领域的热点之一.提出了子句搜索方法判定命题子句集Φ的可满足性,该方法查找Φ中子句的一个公共不可扩展子句C,当且仅当找到C时Φ可满足,此时C中各文字的补构成一个模型.结合部分实例化方法将子句搜索方法提升至一阶.一阶子句搜索方法可以判定子句集的M可满足性,具备终止性、正确性和完备性,是一种判定子句集可满足性的有效方法.     

Knuth-Bendix completion of theories of commuting group endomorphisms

Knuth-Bendix completions of the equational theories of k?2 commuting group endomorphisms are obtained, using automated theorem proving and modern termination checking. This improves on modern implementations of completion, where the orderings implemented cannot orient the commutation rules. The result has applications in decision procedures for automated verification.     

基于目标演绎距离的一阶逻辑子句集预处理方法

一阶逻辑定理证明是人工智能的核心基础,研究一阶逻辑自动定理证明器的相关理论和高效的算法实现具有重要的学术意义。当前一阶逻辑自动定理证明器首先通过子句集预处理约简子句集规模,然后通过演绎方法对定理进行判定。现有的应用于证明器中的子句集预处理方法普遍只从与目标子句项符号相关性角度出发,不能很好地从文字的互补对关系中体现子句间的演绎。为了在子句集预处理时从演绎的角度刻画子句间的关系,定义了目标演绎距离的概念并给出了计算方法,提出了一种基于目标演绎距离的一阶逻辑子句集预处理方法。首先对原始子句集进行包含冗余子句约简并应用纯文字删除规则,然后根据目标子句计算剩余子句集中的文字目标演绎距离、子句目标演绎距离,并最终通过设定子句演绎距离阈值来实现对子句集的进一步预处理。将该预处理方法应用于顶尖证明器Vampire,以2017年国际一阶逻辑自动定理证明器标准一阶逻辑问题组竞赛例为测试对象,在标准的300 s内,加入提出的子句集预处理方法的Vampire4.1相比原始的Vampire4.1多证明4个定理,能证明10个Vampire4.1未证明的定理,占其未证明定理总数的13.5%;在证明的定理中,提出的...     

HOL-Boogie—An Interactive Prover-Backend for the Verifying C Compiler

Boogie is a verification condition generator for an imperative core language. It has front-ends for the programming languages C# and C enriched by annotations in first-order logic, i.e. pre- and postconditions, assertions, and loop invariants. Moreover, concepts like ghost fields, ghost variables, ghost code and specification functions have been introduced to support a specific modeling methodology. Boogie’s verification conditions—constructed via a wp calculus from annotated programs—are usually transferred to automated theorem provers such as Simplify or Z3. This also comprises the expansion of language-specific modeling constructs in terms of a theory describing memory and elementary operations on it; this theory is called a machine/memory model. In this paper, we present a proof environment, HOL-Boogie, that combines Boogie with the interactive theorem prover Isabelle/HOL, for a specific C front-end and a machine/memory model. In particular, we present specific techniques combining automated and interactive proof methods for code verification. The main goal of our environment is to help program verification engineers in their task to “debug” annotations and to find combined proofs where purely automatic proof attempts fail.     

Applying SAT Solving in Classification of Finite Algebras

The classification of mathematical structures plays an important role for research in pure mathematics. It is, however, a meticulous task that can be aided by using automated techniques. Many automated methods concentrate on the quantitative side of classification, like counting isomorphism classes for certain structures with given cardinality. In contrast, we have devised a bootstrapping algorithm that performs qualitative classification by producing classification theorems that describe unique distinguishing properties for isomorphism classes. In order to fully verify the classification it is essential to prove a range of problems, which can become quite challenging for classical automated theorem provers even in the case of relatively small algebraic structures. But since the problems are in a finite domain, employing Boolean satisfiability solving is possible. In this paper we present the application of satisfiability solvers to generate fully verified classification theorems in finite algebra. We explore diverse methods to efficiently encode the arising problems both for Boolean SAT solvers as well as for solvers with built-in equational theory. We give experimental evidence for their effectiveness, which leads to an improvement of the overall bootstrapping algorithm.     

Experiments with semantic paramodulation

A semantic restriction is presented for use with paramodulation in automated theorem-proving programs. The method applies to first-order formulas with equality whole clause forms are Horn sets. In this method, an interpretation is given to the program along with the set of clauses to be refuted. The intention is to have the interpretation serve as an example to guide the search for a refutation. The semantic restriction was incorporated into an existing automated theorem-proving program, and a number of experiments were conducted on theorems in abstract algebra. Semantic paramodulation is an extension of set-of-support paramodulation. A comparison of the two strategies was used as the basis for experimentation. The semantic searches performed markedly better than the corresponding set-of-support searches in many of the comparisons. The semantic restriction seems to make the program less sensitive to the choice of rewrite rules and supported clauses.     

Theorem Prover for Intuitionistic Logic Based on the Inverse Method

The first-order intuitionistic logic is a formal theory from the family of constructive logics. In intuitionistic logic, it is possible to extract a particular example x = a and a proof of a formula P(a) from a proof of a formula ?xP(x). Owing to this feature, intuitionistic logic has many applications in mathematics and computer science. Many modern proof assistants include automated tactics for the first-order intuitionistic logic, which simplify the task of solving challenging problems, such as formal verification of software, hardware, and protocols. In this paper, a new theorem prover (called WhaleProver) for full first-order intuitionistic logic is presented. Testing on the ILTP benchmarking library has shown that WhaleProver performance is comparable with the state-of-the-art intuitionistic provers. Our prover has solved more than 800 problems from the ILTP version 1.1.2. Some of them are intractable for other provers. WhaleProver is based on the inverse method proposed by S.Yu. Maslov. We introduce an intuitionistic inverse method calculus which is, in turn, a special kind of sequent calculus. It is also described how to adopt for this calculus several existing proof search strategies proposed for different logical calculi by S.Yu. Maslov, V.P. Orevkov, A.A. Voronkov, and others. In addition, a new proof search strategy is proposed that allows one to avoid redundant inferences. The paper includes results of experiments with WhaleProver on the ILTP library. We believe that Whale- Prover can be used as a test bench for different inference procedures and strategies, as well as for educational purposes.     

命题逻辑提升到一阶逻辑上的子句消去方法

在基于命题逻辑的可满足性问题（SAT）求解器和基于一阶逻辑的定理证明器上，子句集简化一直是必不可少的步骤，而其中子句消去方法在这些子句集简化方法中是非常重要的组成部分。将命题逻辑中的子句消去方法归结隐藏恒真消去方法（RHTE）和归结隐藏包含消去方法（RHSE）提升到一阶逻辑上，并且利用蕴含模归结原则（IMR）证明了这种提升方式在一阶逻辑上具有可靠性（Soundness），即依据这两种子句消去方法删除一阶逻辑公式集中的子句，并不会改变公式集的可满足性或者不可满足性。此外，将这两个方法与一阶逻辑子句消去方法锁子句消去方法（BCE）和归结包含消去方法（RSE）进行组合推广，发展得到一阶逻辑上新型子句消去方法（BC+RHS）E、（RS+RHT）E和（RHS+RHT）E，并且证明了这3种子句消去方法在一阶逻辑上的可靠性。最后，分析比较了这些子句消去方法的有效性，并且证明了这3种新型子句消去方法比组成它们的原始子句消去方法均具有更高的有效性。     

Searching for Shortest Single Axioms for Groups of Exponent 6

In this note, we study shortest (with respect to the number of variable occurrences on the left-hand side) possible single axioms for groups of exponent 6 of the form T = x, where T is a term in product only. These investigations were carried out with the automated theorem provers OTTER and Prover9 and the finite first-order model finder Mace4.     

Extending Sledgehammer with SMT Solvers

Sledgehammer is a component of Isabelle/HOL that employs resolution-based first-order automatic theorem provers (ATPs) to discharge goals arising in interactive proofs. It heuristically selects relevant facts and, if an ATP is successful, produces a snippet that replays the proof in Isabelle. We extended Sledgehammer to invoke satisfiability modulo theories (SMT) solvers as well, exploiting its relevance filter and parallel architecture. The ATPs and SMT solvers nicely complement each other, and Isabelle users are now pleasantly surprised by SMT proofs for problems beyond the ATPs’ reach.