Development of a Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction Method for the Determination of α-Tocopherol in Pigmented Wheat by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography

A dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) method coupled to high-performance liquid chromatography was developed for the analysis of α-tocopherol in grain samples. The DLLME parameters including the type and volume of extractants, the volume of disperser and the addition of salt were examined. The optimized DLLME procedure consisted in the formation of a cloudy solution promoted by the fast addition to the sample (5 mL of saponified sample solution diluted with 5 mL of water) of a mixture of carbon tetrachloride (extraction solvent, 80 μL) and ethanol (dispersive solvent, 200 μL) without the addition of salt, followed by shaking for 5 min and centrifuging for 3 min at 5,000 rpm. Intra- and inter-day repeatability expressed as % RSD were 3.5 and 7.6 %, respectively. The limit of detection and the limit of quantification were 1.9 and 6.3 μg?L^?1. The comparison of this method with the national standardized extraction method, supercritical carbon dioxide extraction, accelerated solvent extraction, and conventional heat-reflux extraction indicates that the DLLME was accurate (no significant differences at the 0.05 % probability level), high efficient, low organic solvent-consuming, and low cost. This procedure was successfully applied to 42 samples of 14 types of purple wheat, for which the content of α-tocopherol exhibited a significantly negative correlation with the pigment content measured by a spectrophotometer. The recovery rates ranged from 90.5 to 103.7 %.     

Analysis of Pesticides in Tomato Combining QuEChERS and Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction Followed by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography

A new sample preparation procedure combining QuEChERS and dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) was optimized for the determination at trace levels of 13 pesticides from different chemical families (i.e. 2,4-D, acetamiprid, bentazone, cymoxanil, deltamethrin, dicamba, diuron, foramsulfuron, mesotrione, metalaxyl-M, methomyl, pyraclostrobin and tembotrione) in tomato by high-performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection. Target pesticides from tomato samples were isolated by liquid partitioning with acetonitrile and salts and cleaned up by dispersive solid-phase extraction (d-SPE); the analytes were concentrated in trichloromethane by the DLLME procedure. The disperser solvent from DLLME was used at the same time as carrier of analytes form extraction in QuEChERS method. The main factors affecting sample cleanup by d-SPE in QuEChERS and DLLME yield were optimized by means of an experimental design. Under the optimum conditions, good linearity was obtained, the recoveries of pesticides in tomato samples at spiking levels between 0.01 and 1.00 mg/kg ranged from 86 to 116 % (for foramsulfuron and cymoxanil, respectively). Precision was within 15.0 % (RSD) except at the LQ for tembotrione, which was 17.4 %. Limits of quantification achieved (ranging from 0.0058 to 0.15 mg/kg) were below the maximum residue limits established by the European Union.     

Preparation of Soy Peptides by Liquid Fermentation

Many kinds of microorganism can produce a mount of protease which subsequently hydrolysis the protein of the medium into peptides when they grow in protein containing liquid medium.In the present investigation,the conditions of preparing soybean peptides by liquid fermentation were studied,following results were obtained:(1)SPI is a nice nitrogen source and meanwhile an inducible factor of protease production;its concentration can be as high as 3%-4%.(2)Sucrose is the best carbon source;its concentration is 1%-4%.(3)Under the conditions of 28℃,initial pH6.0,inoculum size 4%,cell age 36hr and fermentation time 24hr-30hr,we can obtain soybean peptides or fermentation liquor with good flavor,its DH reaches 25%-30% and the yield rate can be as high as 75%.(4)Mass spectrograph indicate the MW of the fermentation liquid or the soybean peptides mainly distribute at about 4000Dal,these imply a promising prospect of industrial application of submerged fermentation in producing soybean peptides.     

Application and Optimization of Microwave-Assisted Extraction and Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction Followed by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography for the Determination of Oleuropein and Hydroxytyrosol in Olive Pomace

In the present study, a new method based on microwave-assisted extraction and dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (MAE–DLLME) followed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was proposed for the separation and determination of oleuropein (Ole) and hydroxytyrosol (HyT) from olive pomace samples. The effective factors in the MAE–DLLME process such as microwave power, extraction time, the type and volume of extraction, and dispersive solvents were studied and optimized with the aid of response surface methodology (RSM) based on a central composite design (CCD) to obtain the best condition for Ole and HyT extraction. At the optimized conditions, parameter values were 220 W microwave power, 12 min extraction time, 60 μL extracting solvent, and 500 μL dispersive solvent. The calibration graphs of the proposed method were linear in the range of 10–500,000 μg L^?1, with the coefficient of determination (R²) higher than 0.99 for Ole and HyT. Repeatability of the method, described as the relative standard deviation (RSD), was 4.12–5.63% (n?=?6). The limits of detection were 35 and 20 μg L^?1 for Ole and HyT, respectively. The recoveries of these compounds in the spiked olive pomace sample were from 93 to 98%. The proposed method, MAE–DLLME–HPLC–UV, was an accurate, rapid, and reliable method when compared with previous methods.     

Evaluation of Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction–HPLC–UV for Determination of Deoxynivalenol (DON) in Wheat Flour

A fast and simple method for the extraction of deoxynivalenol (DON) from wheat flour using dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) followed by high-performance liquid chromatography–UV detection has been developed and compared with immunoaffinity column cleanup (IAC) process. The influence of several important parameters on the extraction efficacy was studied. Under optimized conditions, a linear calibration curve was obtained in the range of 50–1,000 μg/L. Average recoveries of DON from spiked wheat samples at levels of 500 μg/kg for DLLME and IAC ranged from 72.9?±?1.6 and 85.5?±?3.1, respectively. A good correlation was found for spiked samples between DLLME and IAC methods. The limit of detection was 125 and 50 μg/kg for DLLME and IAC method, respectively. Advantages of DLLME method with respect to the IAC have been pointed out.     

Ion-Pair-Based Air-Assisted Liquid–Liquid Microextraction for the Extraction and Preconcentration of Phthalic Acids from Aqueous Samples

In the present study, a rapid, simple, and highly efficient sample preparation method based on ion-pair air-assisted liquid–liquid microextraction using a low-density extraction solvent followed by high performance liquid chromatography–diode array detection has been developed for the extraction, preconcentration, and determination of three phthalic acids (phthalic acid, iso-phthalic acid, and terephthalic acid) in aqueous samples. In this method, a mixture of tri-butyl amine (as an ion-pair reagent) and toluene (as an extraction solvent) is transferred into an aqueous sample solution. Fine organic solvent droplets are formed by aspirating and dispersing of the mixture via syringe needle. After that, the formed ion-pairs are extracted into toluene, and after centrifuging, the obtained collected phase is transferred into a microtube and is evaporated to dryness under a stream of nitrogen at room temperature. The residue is re-dissolved in mobile phase and injected into the separation system for analysis. Under the optimum extraction conditions, the method showed low limits of detection and quantification between 0.09–0.24 and 0.29–0.78 ng mL^?1, respectively. Extraction recoveries and enrichment factors were from 88 to 98 % and 443 to 491, respectively. Relative standard deviations for the extraction of 5 ng mL^?1 of each analyte were less than 8.4 % for intra-day (n?=?6) and inter-days (n?=?5) precisions. Finally, different aqueous samples were successfully analyzed using the proposed method, and the target analytes were determined in some of them at ng mL^?1 level.     

Ionic Liquid-Based Vortex-Assisted Liquid–Liquid Microextraction for Simultaneous Determination of Neonicotinoid Insecticides in Fruit Juice Samples

A simple, rapid, and effective method was developed for preconcentration of neonicotinoid insecticides including clothianidin, imidacloprid, acetamiprid, and thiacloprid in fruit juice samples. Room-temperature ionic liquids [C₄MIM][PF₆] can be used as green extractant phases in vortex-assisted liquid–liquid microextraction (VALLME), being compatible with high-performance liquid chromatographic systems. The effect of extraction parameters, including the addition of salt, volume of (C₄MIM)(PF₆), vortex time, and centrifugation time is identified as the key parameters of the method. Under the selected conditions, the high enrichment factors of 100 could be achieved with the limit of detection in the range of 0.25–0.30 ng mL^?1 and with the relative standard deviations of lower than 2.68 and 5.38 % for retention time and peak area, respectively. The proposed method was applied to the analysis of fruit juice samples, and the recoveries of the analytes ranged from 95 to 108 % and relative standard deviations were lower than 7 %. The developed method proposes advantages in reduction of the exposure danger to toxic organic solvents used in the conventional liquid–liquid extraction, simplicity of the extraction processes, rapidity, and sensitivity improvement.     

Fast Preconcentration of Pesticide Residues in Oilseeds by Combination of QuEChERS with Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction Followed by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry

A fast, efficient, and simple method for determination of pesticide residues in pumpkin seeds has been developed combining QuEChERS and dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) followed by gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Parameters affecting the DLLME performance such as solvent selection and volume of extractive and dispersive solvent, salt effect, and extraction time were studied. Under the selected conditions (50 μL extractive solvent chloroform, 1 mL QuEChERS extract, and 3 mL water), the developed method was validated. Linearity was evaluated at nine concentrations in the broad range of 0.1–500 μg/kg with correlation coefficients from 0.9842 to 0.9972. The relative standard deviations at lowest calibration level varied from 0.3 to 22 %. Under the optimum conditions, an enrichment factor was 6–17-fold and detection limits 0.01–12.17 μg/kg were achieved. Finally, the developed and validated method was successfully applied for the extraction and determination of pesticide residues in 16 real samples with 2 positive findings below maximum residue limits (MRL). Limits of detection (LODs) of the proposed method are below the MRLs established by the European Union.     

Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction Followed by Magnetic Solid-Phase Extraction for Determination of Four Parabens in Beverage Samples by Ultra-performance Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry

In this study, a two-step extraction technique was developed for extraction and preconcentration of parabens from beverage samples using ionic liquid dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (IL-DLLME) and magnetic solid-phase extraction (MSPE). In this IL-DLLME followed by MSPE method, ionic liquid (IL, 1-octyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate) formed hydrophobic microdroplets in beverage samples as an extractant of parabens; after the IL-DLLME process was completed, graphene modified Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles (Fe₃O₄@G) were placed to adsorb and isolate IL from the sample solution. After the supernatant was carefully moved, acetonitrile was added to elute the IL containing parabens from Fe₃O₄@G. The experimental variables affecting the extraction procedure have been systematically studied. Under optimal conditions, the detection limits were less than 1.53 ng/mL and the linear detection ranges were 2–500 ng/mL (R ² ≥ 0.998) for these analytes. The recoveries for spiked samples were 58.8–89.2% and satisfactory precision (RSD ≤ 4.8%) were obtained.     

Preconcentration and Trace Determination of Chromium Using Modified Ionic Liquid Cold-Induced Aggregation Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction: Application to Different Water and Food Samples

An efficient microextraction procedure based on modified ionic liquid cold-induced aggregation dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (M-IL-CIA-DLLME) was developed for trace determination of chromium in water and food samples by flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS), and it was used for speciation of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) in water samples by using Na₂SO₃ as the reducing agent. A mixture of water-immiscible 1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate ([Hmim][PF₆]) ionic liquid (IL) (microextraction solvent) and ethanol (disperser solvent) were directly injected into a heated aqueous solution containing bis(2-methoxy benzaldehyde) ethylene diimine as a Schiff’s base ligand (chelating agent), hexafluorophosphate (NaPF₆; as a common ion) and Cr(III). Afterwards, the solution was placed in an ice-water bath and a cloudy solution was formed due to a considerable decrease of IL solubility. After centrifuging, the sedimented phase containing enriched analyte was determined by FAAS. Under the optimum conditions, the calibration graph was linear over the range of 2–50 μg?L^?1 with limit of detection of 0.7 μg?L^?1. The accuracy of the present methodology was tested by recovery experiments and by analyzing a certified reference material. Relative standard deviation (RSD %) was 2.7 % for Cr(III). The proposed method was successfully applied for trace determination of chromium in water and food samples.     

Combined Use of Liquid–Liquid Microextraction and Carbon Nanotube Reinforced Hollow Fiber Microporous Membrane Solid-Phase Microextraction for the Determination of Triazine Herbicides in Water and Milk Samples by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography

A simple, efficient and environmentally friendly method for the extraction and determination of five triazine herbicides in water and milk samples was developed by simultaneous liquid–liquid microextraction and carbon nanotube reinforced hollow fiber microporous membrane solid-phase microextraction coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography–diode array detection. The parameters that affect the extraction efficiencies, including the type and concentration of multi-walled carbon nanotube, type of membrane solvent and desorption solvent, the type and volume of the extraction solvent in sample solution, extraction time and temperature, the pH of sample solution, stirring rate, and ionic strength were investigated and optimized. Under the optimum conditions, the method shows a good linearity within a range of 0.5–200 ng mL⁻¹ for water samples and 1–200 ng mL⁻¹ for milk samples, with the correlation coefficients (r) varying from 0.9991 to 0.9998 and from 0.9989 to 0.9994, respectively. The limits of detection were in the range between 0.08 and 0.15 ng mL⁻¹ for water samples and 0.3 and 0.5 ng mL⁻¹ for milk samples, while the relative standard deviations varied from 4.6% to 6.9% and from 5.3% to 7.7%, respectively. The recoveries of the target analytes at spiking levels of 5.0 and 50.0 ng mL⁻¹ were in the range from 86.6% to 106.8% for water samples and from 81.3% to 97.4% for milk samples. The results demonstrated that the developed method was an efficient pretreatment and enrichment procedure for the determination of triazine pesticides in real water and milk samples.     

Liquid�CLiquid Extraction of Lipase Using Aqueous Two-Phase System

The application of aqueous two-phase extraction for the downstream processing of lipase has been exploited. The influence of system parameters such as phase forming salts, molecular weight of the phase forming polymer, system pH, tie line length, and phase volume ratio on the partitioning behavior of lipase was evaluated. The aqueous two-phase system consisting of PEG6000 and disodium phosphate (Na₂HPO₄) resulted in one-sided partitioning of lipase with partition coefficient 0.11, activity recovery 116%, and purification factor of 2.25. Further, the purity of lipase was increased to 3.59-fold using multi-stage extractions.     

Determination of Triazoles in Tea Samples Using Dispersive Solid Phase Extraction Combined with Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction Followed by Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry

In this study, dispersive solid phase extraction (DSPE) combined with dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) method was developed for the determination of triazole fungicide residues in tea samples. DSPE with ODS C₁₈, primary secondary amine, and florisil as sorbents was applied to clean up and minimize matrix interference from tea samples; it was followed with the enrichment of target compounds in the DLLME procedure and detection with liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The effects of various experimental parameters on the DSPE and DLLME procedures were studied systematically, such as the kinds and volume of sorbents, extraction and dispersive solvents, and extraction time. Under optimum conditions, the method was validated in a tea matrix. The matrix-matched calibration curves of three triazoles had good linearity in the range of 0.0125–50 μg kg^?1, and the linear regression coefficients (r) ranged from 0.9998 to 0.9999. The limits of quantification (S/N?=?10) for penconazole, tebuconazole, and triadimenfon were 4.0, 7.8, and 31.6 ng kg^?1, respectively. The intra-day and inter-day relative standard deviations varied from 3.6 to 18.6 %. Recoveries in three concentration levels were between 91 and 118 %. The obtained results show that the proposed DSPE-DLLME-LC-MS method has the potential to analyze trace fungicides in a complex sample matrix.     

Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction Combined With Micellar Electrokinetic Chromatography for the Determination of Some Photoinitiators in Fruit Juice

A fast and simple technique composed of dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) and micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC) with diode array detector (DAD) was developed for the determination of multi-photoinitiators in fruit juice. Seven photoinitiators were separated in MEKC using a 25 mM borate buffer of pH 8.0, containing 24 mM sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 10 mM β-cyclodextrin (β-CD), and 12.5 % acetonitrile (v/v). A CD-modified MEKC made this method more suitable for the determination of isopropylthioxanthone (ITX) isomers including 2-IXT and 4-ITX than the recently prescribed methods. A DLLME procedure was used as an offline preconcentration strategy. The satisfactory recoveries obtained by DLLME spiked at two spiked levels ranged from 85.6 to 124.7 % with relative standard deviations (RSDs) below 14 %. The limits of quantification (LOQs) ranged from 2.1 to 6.0 μg kg^?1.     

Vortex-Assisted Liquid–Liquid Microextraction Combined with HPLC for the Simultaneous Determination of Five Phthalate Esters in Liquor Samples

A vortex-assisted liquid–liquid microextraction (VALLME) method using hexanoic acid as extractant followed by high-performance liquid chromatography–diode array detection was developed for the extraction and determination of five phthalate esters (PAEs) including bis-methylglycol ester (DMEP), benzyl butyl phthalate (BBP), dicyclohexyl phthalate (DCHP), di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP), and di-n-octyl phthalate (DNOP) from liquor samples. In this method, hexanoic acid was employed as extraction solvent, because its density is lower than water. And vortex mixing was utilized as a mild emulsification procedure to reduce emulsification time and improve the effect of extraction. Under the studied conditions, five phthalate esters were successfully separated within 20 min and the limits of detection were 2.3 ng mL^?1 for DMEP, 1.1 ng mL^?1 for BBP, 1.9 ng mL^?1 for DCHP, 1.2 ng mL^?1 for DBP, and 1.5 ng mL^?1 for DNOP, respectively. Recoveries of the PAEs spiked into liquor samples were ranged from 89 to 93 %. The precisions of the proposed method were varied from 1.6 to 2.6 % (RSD). The VALLME method has been proved to have the potential to be applied to the preconcentration of the target analytes. Moreover, the method is simple, high sensitivity, consumes much less solvent than traditional methods and environmental friendly.     

Detection of Adulterants and Contaminants in Liquid Foods—A Review

Milk and fruit juices have paramount importance in human diet. Increasing demand of these liquid foods has made them vulnerable to economic adulteration during processing and in supply chain. Adulterants are difficult to detect by consumers and thus necessitating the requirement of rapid, accurate and sensitive detection. The potential adulterants in milk and fruit juices and their limits set by different regulatory bodies have been briefly described in this review. Potential advantages and limitations of various techniques such as physicochemical methods, chromatography, immunoassays, molecular, electrical, spectroscopy with chemometrics, electronic nose, and biosensors have been described. Spectroscopy in combination with chemometrics has shown potential for rapid, precise, and sensitive detection of potential adulterants in these liquid foods.     

A Miniaturized Preconcentration Method Based on Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction for the Spectrophotometric Determination of Aziridine in Food Simulants

In this work a simple, rapid and sensitive method using dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) combined with UV–Vis spectrophotometry has been developed for the preconcentration and determination of trace amounts of aziridine in food simulants. The method is based on derivatization of aziridine with Folin's reagent (1,2-naphthoquione-4-sulphonic acid) and extraction of color product using DLLME technique. Some important parameters, such as reaction conditions, and type and volume of extraction solvent and disperser solvent were studied and optimized. Under optimum conditions, a linear calibration curve in the range of 2.0–350 ng mL^?1 of aziridine was obtained. Detection limit based on 3S_b was 1.0 ng mL^?1, and the relative standard deviation for 50 ng mL^?1 of aziridine was 2.49c (n?=?7). The proposed method was applied for the determination of aziridine in food simulants.     

Optimized Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction and Determination of Sorbic Acid and Benzoic Acid in Beverage Samples by Gas Chromatography

A new rapid method for direct determination of trace levels of sorbic and benzoic acids was developed by dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and gas chromatography with flame ionization detection. In the proposed approach, the separation procedure of sorbic and benzoic acids was performed on a general chromatographic column without any prior derivatization processes. Some effective parameters on the microextraction recovery were studied and optimized utilizing multilevel factorial and central composite experimental designs. The best concurrent extraction efficiency acquired using ethanol and chloroform as dispersive and extraction solvents. Central composite design (CCD) resulted in the optimized values of microextraction parameters as follows: 1.0 mL of dispersive and 0.1 mL of extraction solvents, ionic salt concentration of 50 g?L^?1 at pH 4. Under optimum conditions, the calibration curve was linear over the range 0.5–20 mg L^?1. Relative standard deviation was 11% and 13% for five repeated determinations for sorbic and benzoic acids, respectively. Limits of detection were acquired as 0.2 mg L^?1 for sorbic acid and 0.5 mg L^?1 for benzoic acid. The average recoveries were 31% and 39% for sorbic and benzoic acids, respectively. The method was successfully applied to the determination of sorbic and benzoic acids as preservatives in beverage samples.     

Determination of HMF in Vinegar and Soy Sauce Using Two-Step Ultrasonic Assisted Liquid–Liquid Micro-Extraction Coupled with Capillary Electrophoresis-Ultraviolet Detection

A new, rapid, and inexpensive method using two-step ultrasonic assisted liquid–liquid micro-extraction (UALLME) coupled with capillary electrophoresis-ultraviolet (CE-UV) was developed for 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) analysis in high ion strength samples (like vinegar and soy sauce). The factors affecting the extraction efficiency were optimized such as the extraction volume, the ultrasonic time, and the power density of ultrasonic. Under the optimum conditions, the limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantification (LOQ) for HMF were 0.03 and 0.10 mg/L, respectively. The relative standard deviations (RSD %) for HMF were ranging from 0.53 to 3.17%, and the recoveries of HMF were ranging from 91.24 to 109.39%. The results turned out that two-step UALLME-CE-UV was applicable to analyze HMF in vinegar and soy sauce. Eleven brands of vinegar and soy sauce were tested by two-step UALLME-CE-UV, and the results showed that the method had a potential application in analysis of foodstuffs. The two step UALLME method was effective to improve the selectivity and sensitivity of CE-UV method for HMF analysis in vinegar and soy sauce.     

Determination of Benzalkonium Homologues and Didecyldimethylammonium in Powdered and Liquid Milk for Infants by Hydrophilic Interaction Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry

In this study, a hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (HILIC-MS/MS) method for the determination of benzalkonium (BAC) homologues and didecyldimethylammonium (DDAC) was developed. A satisfactory chromatographic separation of BAC homologues and DDAC was achieved using, as mobile phase, acetonitrile–aqueous 50 mM ammonium formate (pH 3.2) (93?+?7 v/v) at 0.3 mL min^?1. The elution order of BAC homologues was from benzyldimethylhexadecylammonium chloride (C₁₆-BAC) to benzyldimethyldecylammonium chloride (C₁₀-BAC), the exact opposite with respect to separation using reversed liquid chromatography. The instrumental method was successfully applied to powdered and liquid milk for infants (about 50 samples). From powdered milk samples, BAC and DDAC were extracted using 5 % formic acid in methanol for 60 min at 60 °C in an ultrasonic bath; after dilution with water and 5 % NH₄OH solution, a purification step using a weak cationic exchange column was performed. Satisfactory limit of detections (LODs) were achieved, below 1.0 μg kg^?1 and 0.05 μg L^?1 for powdered and liquid milk for infants, respectively. No sample was free of BAC homologues and DDAC, and in one powdered milk sample, the contamination level exceeded 500 μg kg^?1, the maximum level recommended by the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health for food and feed.