Encoding and selective activation of "metabolic memories" in the rat.

Experiment 1 used Pavlovian conditioning procedures to show that rats formed distinct memorial representations of 2 (peanut oil and sucrose pellets) unconditioned stimuli (USs) that could be activated by 2 different conditioned stimuli (CSs). After training in Experiment 2, rats injected with the lipid antimetabolite Na-2-mercaptoacetate (MA) responded more to the CS for oil than to the CS for sucrose. This pattern was not shown by rats that received isotonic saline or systemic 2-deoxy-d-glucose (a glucose antimetabolite). By contrast, intracerebroventricular infusion of the glucose antimetabolite 5-thioglucose selectively promoted responding to the CS for sucrose (Experiment 4). Thus, lipoprivic and glucoprivic treatments selectively promoted the activation of the memories of fat and carbohydrate USs, respectively. In Experiment 3, the capacity of MA to augment responding to a CS for oil was abolished for rats that received subdiaphragmatic vagal deafferentation. This indicates that the capacity of lipoprivic signals to selectively activate the representations of fat USs may depend on vagal afferent fibers. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Transfer of negative occasion setting and conditioned inhibition across conditioned and unconditioned stimuli.

The transfer of negative occasion setting and conditioned inhibition across conditioned stimuli (CSs) and unconditioned stimuli (USs) was examined in four experiments that used Pavlovian appetitive feature negative discrimination training procedures with rats. After training with simultaneous compounds (A+, XA–), X inhibited conditioned responding (CRs) elicited by other CSs and CRs supported by other appetitive USs that had not been involved in discrimination training. After training with serial compounds (A+, X→A–), X's power to set the occasion for nonresponding transferred across CSs and USs only if those events had also been involved in serial feature negative discrimination training. The results supported the suggestion that the acquisition of negative occasion setting involves the representation of individual events in a higher order memory system, separate from that involved in simple association, and that negative occasion setters act only on events that are represented in that system. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Temporal Learning in Random Control Procedures.

Experiments 1 and 2 delivered conditioned stimuli (CSs) at random times and unconditioned stimuli (USs) at either fixed (Experiment 1) or random (Experiment 2) intervals. In Experiment 3, CS duration was manipulated, and US deliveries occurred at random during the background. In all 3 experiments, the mean rate of responding (head entries into the food cup) in the background was determined by the mean US-US interval, and the mean rate during the CS was a linear combination of responding controlled by the mean US-US and mean CS onset-US intervals; the pattern of responding in time was determined by the interval distribution form (fixed or random). An event-based timing account, Packet theory, provided an explanation of the results. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Combining CSs associated with the same or different USs

In three experiments, hungry rats received appetitive training with four stimuli, A, B, X, and Y. In each Experiment, A and B were paired with one unconditioned stimulus (US; e.g. food pellets) whereas X and Y were paired with a second US (e.g. sucrose). Subsequently, rats responded more vigorously to combinations of stimuli associated with different USs (A-Y & X-B) than to combinations of stimuli associated with the same US (A-B & X-Y; Experiments 1, 2, & 3). This effect was observed when the stimuli were presented simultaneously and during the second elements of serial compounds (Experiments 2 & 3). Moreover, combining CSs associated with different USs resulted in a more marked CR than combining CSs that had each been paired with both US1 and US2 (Experiment 3). These results suggest that the sensory properties of appetitive reinforcers have an important influence on performance.     

Pavlovian contingencies and temporal information.

The effects of altering the contingency between the conditioned stimulus (CS) and the unconditioned stimulus (US) on the acquisition of autoshaped responding was investigated by changing the frequency of unsignaled USs during the intertrial interval. The addition of the unsignaled USs had an effect on acquisition speed comparable with that of massing trials. The effects of these manipulations can be understood in terms of their effect on the amount of information (number of bits) that the average CS conveys to the subject about the timing of the next US. The number of reinforced CSs prior to acquisition is inversely related to the information content of the CS. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Intertrial unconditioned stimuli preferentially interfere with delay conditioning.

One way to minimize excitation acquired by the conditioned stimulus (CS) is to introduce intertrial presentations of the unconditioned stimulus (US). However, even in the presence of frequent intertrial USs, Experiments 1a and 1b found that rats anticipated the customary arrival time of a food pellet US when it occurred before (embedded)—versus coincident with (delay)—the termination of a white noise CS. Delay conditioning emerged in Experiment 2 in the absence of intertrial USs; hence, the detrimental effects of intertrial USs depended on the CS-US relationship, delay versus embedded, and not the duration of CS-US interval. Experiments 3a, 3b, and 4 found that random USs located in the early portion of the intertrial interval increased the control acquired by contextual stimuli at the expense of temporal stimuli occasioned near CS termination. Our results suggest that delay relationships leave the CS especially vulnerable to the deleterious effects of intertrial USs. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Control of fluid palatability by exteroceptive Pavlovian signals.

Two experiments, with 15 male albino rats, investigated whether discrete auditory conditioned stimulus/stimuli (CS) that signal the availability or onset of taste unconditioned stimulus/stimuli (UCS) (sucrose, quinine) can control orofacial responses in the absence of those UCSs. In Exp I, one auditory stimulus (CS+) was paired with the delivery of a sucrose solution to the magazine floor, and another auditory stimulus (CS–) was never followed by sucrose. Following conditioning, oral infusions of water that were preceded by the CS+ were found to elicit more ingestive (sucrose-typical) orofacial responses than did water alone or water preceded by the CS–. In Exp II, the conditioned ingestive reactions to a signal for sucrose observed in Exp I again occurred, and conditioned aversive (quinine-typical) orofacial responses occurred in response to water infusions preceded by a former signal for quinine. Data suggest that perceived palatability may be influenced by Pavlovian associations involving exteroceptive CSs and illustrate the importance of supporting stimuli in modulating the effects of Pavlovian associations on behavior. (41 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

I like it because I said that I like it: Evaluative conditioning effects can be based on stimulus-response learning.

Evaluative conditioning (EC) effects are often assumed to be based on a learned mental link between the CS (conditioned stimulus) and the US (unconditioned stimulus). We demonstrate that this link is not the only one that can underlie EC effects, but that if evaluative responses are actually given during the learning phase also a direct link between the CS and an evaluative response—a CS-ER link—can be learned and lead to EC effects. In Experiment 1, CSs were paired with USs and participants were asked to evaluate the pairs during the conditioning phase. Resulting EC effects were unaffected by a later revaluation of the USs, suggesting that these EC effects can be attributed to CS-ER learning rather than to CS-US learning. Experiment 2 replicated Experiment 1 with the difference that no evaluative responses were given during the learning phase. EC effects in this study were influenced by US revaluation, suggesting that these EC effects are mainly based on CS-US learning. In Experiment 3, it was shown that EC effects can be found even if the USs are entirely removed from the procedure and the CSs are only paired with enforced evaluative responses. Together the experiments show that the valence of a stimulus can change because of a contingency with an evaluative response. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)     

Associative structure of fear memory after basolateral amygdala lesions in rats.

The authors have recently demonstrated that rats with basolateral amygdala (BLA) lesions acquire Pavlovian fear conditioning after overtraining. However, it is not known whether the associative basis of Pavlovian fear memory acquired by rats with BLA lesions is similar to that of intact rats. Associations are typically formed between the conditional (CS) and unconditional (US) stimuli (stimulus-stimulus; S-S), although it is possible for stimuli to enter into association with the responses they produce (stimulus-response; S-R). Indeed, the central nucleus of the amygdala, which is essential for fear conditioning in rats with BLA lesions, may mediate S-R associations in some Pavlovian tasks. The authors therefore used a postconditioning US inflation procedure (i.e., exposure to intense footshock USs) to assess the contribution of S-S associations to fear conditioning after overtraining in rats with BLA lesions. In Experiment 1, intact rats that were overtrained and later inflated displayed elevated freezing levels when tested, indicating that S-S associations contribute to overtrained fear memories. Interestingly, neither neurotoxic BLA lesions nor temporary inactivation of the BLA during overtraining prevented the inflation effect (Experiment 2 and 3, respectively). These results reveal that S-S associations support Pavlovian fear memories after overtraining in both intact rats and rats with BLA lesions, and imply that the central nucleus of the amygdala encodes CS-US associations during fear conditioning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Second-order conditioning with and without unconditioned stimulus presentation

The effects of presenting various episodes after serial presentation of two conditioned stimuli (CS2-CS1 sequences) on second-order conditioning to CS2 were examined in three experiments using rat subjects in an appetitive conditioning situation. In Experiment 1, presentation of food unconditioned stimuli (USs) immediately after CS2-CS1 sequences interfered with second-order conditioning of CS2. In Experiment 2, postsequence presentation of a "surprising" US interfered with second-order conditioning more than did presentation of an "expected" US; similarly, less second-order conditioning of CS2 was observed when postsequence nonpresentation of a US was surprising than when US omission was expected. In Experiment 3, the interfering effect of US presentation on second-order conditioning was smaller when a brief delay was introduced between presentation of the CS2-CS-1 sequence and the US. The results are discussed in terms of an information-processing theory recently proposed by Wagner and his colleagues.     

Slow reacquisition following extinction: Context, encoding, and retrieval mechanisms.

Investigated the slow reacquisition (RAQ) of responding in rats that occurs when the conditioned stimulus/stimuli (CS) and unconditioned stimulus/stimuli (UCS) are paired again after prolonged extinction training. In Exp 1, an extinguished CS acquired less suppression than a novel CS during a final conditioning phase, but more suppression than CSs that had received comparable nonreinforcement without initial conditioning. In Exp 2, CS–UCS pairings resumed in the context of extinction caused the least RAQ of suppression: Pairings in a neutral context produced better RAQ, while return of the CS to the conditioning context caused an immediate renewal of responding to the CS. In Exp 3, a return of the CS to the extinction context after RAQ training caused renewed extinction performance and interfered with performance appropriate to RAQ. This effect was not due to demonstrable inhibitory conditioning of the extinction context. Results suggest that representations of conditioning and extinction (or CS–UCS and CS–no UCS relations) are both retained through extinction and that performance appropriate to either phase can be cued by the corresponding context. RAQ may thus be slow when the context retrieves an extinction memory. Similar mechanisms may also play a role in other Pavlovian interference paradigms. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Hippocampectomy disrupts auditory trace fear conditioning and contextual fear conditioning in the rat

The hippocampus is believed to be an important structure for learning tasks that require temporal processing of information. The trace classical conditioning paradigm requires temporal processing because the conditioned stimulus (CS) and the unconditioned stimulus (US) are temporally separated by an empty trace interval. The present study sought to determine whether the hippocampus was necessary for rats to perform a classical trace fear conditioning task in which each of 10 trials consisted of an auditory tone CS (1 5-s duration) followed by an empty 30-s trace interval and then a fear-producing floor-shock US (0.5-s duration). Several weeks prior to training, animals were anesthetized and given aspiration lesions of the neocortex (NEO; n = 6), hippocampus and overlying neocortex (HIPP; n = 7), or no lesions at all (control; n = 6). Approximately 24 h after trace conditioning, NEO and control animals showed a significant decrease in movement to a CS-alone presentation that was indicative of a conditioned fear response. Animals in the HIPP group did not show conditioned fear responses to the CS alone, nor did a pseudoconditioning group (n = 7) that was trained with unpaired CSs and USs. Furthermore, all groups except the HIPP group showed conditioned fear responses to the original context in which they received shock USs. One week later, HIPP, NEO, and control animals received delay fear-conditioning trials with no trace interval separating the CS and US. Six of seven HIPP animals could perform the delay version, but none could perform the trace version. This result suggests that the trace fear task is a reliable and useful model for examining the neural mechanisms of hippocampally dependent learning.     

Extending conditioned stimuli before versus after unconditioned stimuli: Implications for real-time models of conditioning.

In four experiments using the conditioned suppression procedure with rats, we compared the effects of extending conditioned stimuli (CSs) before versus after reinforcement (called B vs. A extensions). In Experiments 1 and 2, Group 0 (no extension) received 2-min noise CS trials (3 per day in Experiment 1, 1 per day in Experiment 2) that terminated with a 1-s grid shock unconditioned stimulus (US). For Group B, the CS began 12 min before the US; for Group A, the CS began 2 min before the US but persisted for 10 min past US termination. In Experiments 3 and 4, similar trials (3 per day in Experiment 3, 1 per day in Experiment 4) included a 2-min light CS that always terminated with the US; thus the noise CS became a systematically manipulated context cue in which light-shock pairings were embedded. In Experiments 1 and 2 we found asymmetrical effects of CS extensions: B extensions weakened conditioning more than did A extensions. In Experiments 3 and 4 we found symmetrical effects: A and B extensions weakened context conditioning equally. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Discriminated lateralized eyeblink conditioning in the rabbit: An experimental context for separating specific and general associative influences.

Four experiments demonstrated discriminated lateralized eyeblink conditioning in 38 male rabbits and showed how the phenomenon may be used to differentiate between the reflexive and emotive consequences of Pavlovian conditioning. Exps 1, 2, and 3 characterized how 2 conditioned stimuli (CSs), contemporaneously trained with left vs right paraorbital unconditioned stimuli (UCSs), can produce different CRs, each involving predominant closure of the eye ipsilateral to its UCS. Exp 4 showed how the associative tendencies controlled by additional stimuli could be evaluated by presentations in compound with such discriminanda: A 30-sec stimulus, presumed to acquire a conditioned emotional response but no eyeblink CR, equally potentiated the eyelid CRs elicited by both CSs. A 1,050-msec CS that evoked an eyeblink CR in isolation also increased the responding to both CSs but biased it toward its own lateralized CR. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Pavlovian inhibitory conditioning and tolerance to pentobarbital-induced hypothermia in rats.

One group of rats (discrimination group) from an S pool of 96 male Sprague-Dawley rats received training in which, on alternate days, 1 conditioned stimulus (CS+) was associated with administration of 30 mg/kg pentobarbital (PBB), and a different CS (CS–) with saline. Controls received either exposure to both CSs but not the drug or to the drug but no CSs or to neither the CSs nor the drug. Subsequently, half the Ss in each group received injections of PBB in the presence of one of the CSs and the remaining half in the presence of the other CS. Results show that the discrimination group injected with PBB in the presence of CS+ displayed the most tolerance, whereas the discrimination group injected with PBB in the presence of CS– displayed the least tolerance. The attenuation of tolerance in the discrimination group injected in the presence of CS– provides evidence of inhibitory Pavlovian conditioning. Additional evidence of inhibitory conditioning was provided by the fact that CS? enhanced the hypothermic effects of PBB in the discrimination group, whereas CS? attenuated these effects. (30 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Modulation by the stimulus properties of excitation

Three experiments with pigeons investigated the role of excitation in a Pavlovian modulatory paradigm where the reinforcement contingencies of a conditioned stimulus (CS) were signaled by modulatory stimuli. In Experiment 1, excitatory training of the modulator that signaled reinforcement, the positive modulator, had a greater facilitative impact on discrimination learning than did excitatory training of both modulators. Although this could have resulted from simple excitatory summation, Experiment 2 revealed that excitatory training of the negative modulator also enhanced learning more than did excitatory training of both modulators. In Experiment 3, responding to CSs that had come under the control of differentially excitatory modulators was similarly controlled by new stimuli that had received simple differential excitatory training. Results suggest that excitation can play a modulatory role in Pavlovian conditioning.     

Blocking, Unblocking, and Overexpectation of Fear: A Role for Opioid Receptors in the Regulation of Pavlovian Association Formation.

Injection of the opioid receptor antagonist naloxone facilitated acquisition of fear to contextual and auditory conditioned stimuli (CSs) in Experiments 1A and 1B. Experiment 2 showed that prior conditioning to a distinctive context blocked conditioning to an auditory CS. Blocking of CS fear was prevented by administrations of naloxone or increases in footshock intensity. Blocking of CS fear was facilitated by decreases in footshock intensity in a naloxone-reversible manner. Experiment 3 showed that compound conditioning of two CSs, each previously and separately paired with shock, produced overexpectation of fear that was reversed by naloxone. These results are consistent with a role for opioid receptors controlling Pavlovian association formation by regulating the discrepancy (A--ΣV) described by R. A. Rescorla and A. R. Wagner (1972). (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Local time horizons in Pavlovian learning.

Responding to a CS is impaired if the CS is trained in the presence of excitatory local context cues. Four lick suppression experiments with rats explored whether this local context effect arises from the influence of excitatory cues that precede or that follow a reinforced target CS. Pretrained nontarget stimuli served as local context cues that occurred (1) immediately before and after the target CS trial, (2) immediately before or after the target CS trial, or (3) only before or after the target CS trial with varying intervals between the nontarget stimulus and target CS. Results indicated similar control over responding to the target CS by the preceding and following nontarget cues. This outcome implies a symmetrical window of memory integration (local time horizon) for a Pavlovian CS. Possible mechanisms underlying the detrimental effect of embedding a CS in an excitatory local context are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)